A population-based cohort study of oral health in South Brazil: The Porto Alegre Study

Occurrence of periodontal diseases according to the ACES 2018 Classification Framework and the CDC/AAP definition: A cross-sectional study in a major Brazilian city

AIM

The occurrence of periodontal diseases is still to be determined in large samples of major Brazilian cities. This study aimed to assess the periodontal status of adults from Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil, using periodontitis definitions by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Periodontology (CDC/AAP) and the recently published ACES 2018 Classification Framework.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A multi-stage probability sampling technique was applied to draw individuals aged 18 or older. A total of 566 individuals underwent a full-mouth periodontal examination. Periodontitis cases were defined according to the CDC/AAP and the ACES 2018 Classification Framework. Non-periodontitis cases were classified as healthy or gingivitis. The agreement between the two definitions was calculated.

RESULTS

Periodontal health was present in 33.6% and 13.8% of individuals, and gingivitis was found in 11.7% and 7.5%, according to CDC/AAP and ACES, respectively. Mild, moderate and severe periodontitis (CDC/AAP) were present in 2.1%, 33.4% and 19.1% of individuals, respectively. Using ACES, 34.3% had Stages I/II and 43.3% had Stages III/IV. The occurrence of periodontitis was higher when a subgroup of individuals aged 30+ were analysed, ranging from 69.6% (CDC/AAP) to 90.1% (ACES). CDC/AAP and ACES agreement for health, gingivitis and periodontitis accounted for 68.8% of the observations.

CONCLUSIONS

Periodontal diseases affect more than 66% of the population aged 18+ years. Classic definition by the CDC/AAP and the recently published ACES Framework yielded moderate agreement.

Effect of glutamine ingestion on the progression of induced periodontitis: experimental study in rats

Abstract Introduction With glutamine supplementation there is better performance in the body’s defense system. Objective The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of glutamine supplementation on ligand-induced periodontal disease in rats. Material and method 48 selected male Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups (N = 12): control group (CG) including healthy animals receiving daily saline solution via gavage; glutamine group (GG) including healthy animals receiving oral glutamine supplementation by gavage at a dose of 1.5 g / kg / day; periodontitis group (PG) including animals with induced periodontal disease on both upper sides receiving daily saline solution via gavage; experimental group (EG) including animals with induced periodontal disease on both upper sides receiving daily glutamine via gavage at a dose of 1.5 g / kg / day. On the 30th day, all animals were euthanized by excess anesthetic. Result In the various analyses, the EG (116.63 ± 22.50 mm2) compared to the CG (82.32 ± 7.48 mm2) obtained a p<0.05. The PG (143.15 ± 35.24 mm2) compared to the EG group (116.63 ± 22.50 mm2 ) presented a p<0.05. The PG (143.15 ± 35.24 mm2) compared to the CG (82.32 ± 7.48 mm2) presented a p<0.05. The GG (118.09 ± 10.4 mm2) compared to the CG (82.32 ± 7.48 mm2) presented a p>0.05. Conclusion Glutamine supplementation associated with induced periodontal disease demonstrated a smaller amount of bone loss compared to the periodontitis group.

Partial-mouth periodontal examination protocol for estimating periodontitis extent and severity in a US population

We have previously demonstrated that half-mouth four-site periodontal examination protocol performed well in estimating periodontitis prevalence. This study aimed to assess biases associated with this same protocol in estimating periodontitis extent and severity in a United States population. Periodontitis extent as determined by percentage of sites with clinical attachment loss (CAL) ≥3, and ≥5 mm and severity as determined by mean CAL were calculated for full-mouth examination and half-mouth four-site protocol based on 3734 adults sampled from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2010. Probing depth was excluded because of low data reliability. The comparison between full-mouth and half-mouth assessments was based on bias, relative bias, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). For full-mouth examination, periodontitis extent was 21.2% for CAL ≥3 mm and 6.9% for CAL ≥5 mm; periodontitis severity (mean CAL) was 1.73 mm. Half-mouth four-site protocol provided bias -1.2% and relative bias -5.7% for extent (CAL ≥3 mm). Corresponding numbers were -0.3% and 4.3% for extent (CAL ≥5 mm), -0.05 mm and -2.9% for severity. Although the difference between full-mouth and half-mouth assessments was statistically significant, ICCs between them were ≥0.96 for extent (CAL ≥3, 5 mm), and severity (mean CAL). Half-mouth four-site protocol performed well in estimating periodontitis extent and severity based on CAL. Therefore, this protocol should be considered for periodontitis surveillance.