Early prediction of poor outcome in patients with acute asthma in the emergency room

Prevalence of obesity in asthma and its relations with asthma severity and control

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of obesity in asthmatic patients attending at an outpatient clinic, and to investigate its relationships with asthma severity and level of asthma control. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study we recruited patients aged 11 years and older with confirmed asthma diagnosis from the outpatient asthma clinic of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. They underwent an evaluation by a general questionnaire, an asthma control questionnaire and by pulmonary function tests. Nutritional status was classified by body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: 272 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 51.1 ± 16.5 years and there were 206 (74.9%) female patients. Mean BMI was 27.5 ± 5.3 kg/m², and 96 (35.3%) patients were classified as normal weight, 97 (35.7%) as overweight and 79 (29%) as obesity. There was a significant higher proportion of female than male patients (34.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.002) in the obesity group. There were no significant differences with respect to asthma control (p = 0.741) and severity classification (p = 0.506). The FEV1% predicted was significantly higher in the obese than in the non-obese group (73.7% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.037). Logistic regression analysis identified sex (OR = 3.84, p = 0.002) as an independent factor associated with obesity. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed a high prevalence of obesity in asthmatic patients. Obese and non-obese subjects were similar in regard to asthma severity and level of asthma control. Female sex was associated with obesity in this asthma population.

Prevalence of obesity in asthma and its relations with asthma severity and control

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of obesity in asthmatic patients attending at an outpatient clinic, and to investigate its relationships with asthma severity and level of asthma control.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional study we recruited patients aged 11 years and older with confirmed asthma diagnosis from the outpatient asthma clinic of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. They underwent an evaluation by a general questionnaire, an asthma control questionnaire and by pulmonary function tests. Nutritional status was classified by body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

272 patients were included in the study. Mean age was 51.1 ± 16.5 years and there were 206 (74.9%) female patients. Mean BMI was 27.5 ± 5.3kg/m(2), and 96 (35.3%) patients were classified as normal weight, 97 (35.7%) as overweight and 79 (29%) as obesity. There was a significant higher proportion of female than male patients (34.3% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.002) in the obesity group. There were no significant differences with respect to asthma control (p = 0.741) and severity classification (p = 0.506). The FEV1% predicted was significantly higher in the obese than in the non-obese group (73.7% vs. 67.2%, p = 0.037). Logistic regression analysis identified sex (OR = 3.84, p = 0.002) as an independent factor associated with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed a high prevalence of obesity in asthmatic patients. Obese and non-obese subjects were similar in regard to asthma severity and level of asthma control. Female sex was associated with obesity in this asthma population.

Prediction of unsuccessful treatment in patients with severe acute asthma

BACKGROUND

Clinical assessment can be used to identify which patients with acute asthma are at risk of unsuccessful initial treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To determine which elements of clinical assessment predict unsuccessful treatment, defined as needing critical care or any unplanned additional treatment.

METHODS

We analysed data from a large multicentre trial (the 3Mg trial). Adults with severe acute asthma underwent standardised clinical assessment, including peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), up to 2 h after initiation of treatment. Standard care was provided other than blinded random allocation to trial treatment or placebo. Patients were followed up by record review up to 30 days. Unsuccessful treatment was defined as needing (1) critical care or (2) critical care or any unplanned additional treatment within 7 days of presentation. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors and derive a prediction model for each outcome.

RESULTS

Out of 1084 patients analysed, 81 (7%) received critical care and 157 (14%) received critical care or unplanned additional treatment. Baseline PEFR (p=0.017), baseline heart rate (p<0.001), other serious illness (p=0.019), PEFR change (p=0.015) and heart rate change (p<0.001) predicted need for critical care. Baseline PEFR (p=0.010), baseline heart rate (p<0.001), baseline respiratory rate (p=0.017), other serious illness (p=0.023), PEFR change (p=0.003) and heart rate change (p=0.001) predicted critical care or additional treatment. Models based on these characteristics had c-statistics of 0.77 and 0.69, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PEFR, heart rate and other serious illnesses are the best predictors of unsuccessful treatment, but models based on these variables provide modest predictive value.

The patient with asthma in the emergency department

Asthma is a highly prevalent disease that presents commonly to the emergency department (ED) in acute exacerbation. Recent asthma treatment guidelines have added content dedicated to the management of acute exacerbations. Effective management of an exacerbation requires rapid assessment of severity through physical examination, measurement of peak expiratory flow rate, and response to initial treatment. Most therapies are directed at alleviating bronchospasm and decreasing airway inflammation. While inhaled short-acting beta-agonists, systemic corticosteroids, and supplemental oxygen are the initial and often only therapies required for patients with mild moderate exacerbations, high-dose beta agonists and inhaled anti-cholinergics should also be given to patients with severe exacerbations. Adjunctive therapy with intravenous magnesium and Heliox-driven nebulization of bronchodilators should be considered for patients presenting with severe and very severe exacerbations. Early recognition and appropriate management of respiratory failure are required to mitigate the risk of complications including death. Disposition should be determined based on serial assessments of the response to therapy over the first 4 h in the ED. Patients stable for discharge should receive medications, asthma education including a written asthma action plan, and should have follow-up scheduled for them by ED staff. Rapid implementation of evidence-based, multi-disciplinary care is required to ensure the best possible outcomes for this potentially treatable disease.

Predicting response to therapy in acute asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To analyze the prediction of response of therapy into the context of acute adult asthma assessment in the emergency department (ED) setting.

RECENT FINDINGS

Close monitoring of the patient's condition at presentation (static assessment) and response to treatment (dynamic assessment), including serial measurements of lung function, is an essential part of the acute asthma care in the ED. The severity of airflow obstruction cannot be accurately judged by patient's symptoms and physical examination alone. Accordingly, it is very important to use an objective measure of airway obstruction (spirometry or peak flow meter). Although spirometry can be performed in acutely ill ED asthmatics, measurement of peak expiratory flow, with values expressed as predicted normal values, represents an alternative if spirometry is not available.

SUMMARY

Failure of initial therapy to improve expiratory flow predicts a more severe course and need for hospitalization. Although several score systems have been developed, different factors limit their applicability in the ED setting. Thus, peak expiratory flow rate measures at 15-60 min of treatment, joined with continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation may be the best ways to assess patients with acute asthma.

Effect of clinical pathways on the management of acute asthma in the emergency department: five years of evaluation

There is a wide variability in clinical practice for treating acute asthma (AA) in the emergency department (ED), interfering in the quality of care. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of a clinical pathway on the management of AA in the ED. We conducted a prospective before-after study of patients presenting with AA to the adult ED, during five separate periods (from January to March): in 2001 (pre-protocol group), 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 (6 months without educational reinforcement). We evaluated the effects of the recommendations on objective assessment of severity, diagnostic resource utilization, use of recommended and non-recommended therapy, and outcomes. The 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 groups comprised, respectively: 108, 96, 97, 98, and 101 patients. There was a significant increase in the use of pulse oximetry (8.3%, 77.1%, 88.7%, 95.9%, and 97.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). There was an increase in the use of peak expiratory flow rate from 2001 to 2004 (4.6%, 20.8%, 28.9%, and 48.0%) and a decrease after a period without educational efforts (29.7%, p < 0.001). Although the overall use of systemic corticosteroids was not changed, there was a significant increase in the use of oral steroids (p < 0.001). There was a decrease in aminophylline utilization (p = 0.005). Length of stay in the ED was significantly reduced (p = 0.04). There was no effect on hospital admission or emergency discharge (p = 0.193). The AA clinical pathway applied in the ED was associated with a positive effect on improving the quality of care.

Early prognosis of acute asthma in the emergency room

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical and pulmonary function measurements taken in the first fifteen minutes of the assessment of acute asthma in the emergency room and used for prognostic purposes.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study involving consecutive patients with acute asthma. Only patients who were between the ages of 12 and 55 and presented peak expiratory flow rates < or = 50% of predicted were included. Evaluations were performed upon admission, then again at 15 minutes and 4 hours after the initiation of treatment. Treatment included albuterol and ipratropium delivered by metered-dose inhaler with a spacer, together with 100 mg of intravenous hydrocortisone. Favorable outcomes were defined as peak expiratory flow > or = 50% of predicted after 4 hours of treatment, and unfavorable outcomes were defined as peak expiratory flow < 50% after 4 hours of treatment.

RESULTS

Favorable outcomes were seen in 27 patients, and unfavorable outcomes were seen in 24 patients. In the multivariate analysis, peak expiratory flow as percentage of predicted was identified as the variable with the highest predictive value. A peak expiratory flow > or = 40% after 15 minutes of treatment showed significant power in predicting a favorable outcome (sensitivity = 0.74, specificity = 1.00, and positive predictive value = 1.00). A peak expiratory flow < 30% after 15 minutes of treatment was predictive of a poor outcome (sensitivity = 0.54, specificity = 0.93, and positive predictive value = 0.87).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that measuring peak expiratory flow after 15 minutes of management in the emergency room is a useful tool for predicting outcomes in cases of acute asthma.

Fatores preditivos da evolução da asma aguda em crianças

OBJETIVO: Identificar fatores preditivos da evolução da asma aguda, a partir de características clínicas e funcionais observadas no momento da admissão de crianças em unidade de emergência. MÉTODOS: Este estudo avaliou prospectivamente 130 crianças com asma aguda, na faixa etária de um a treze anos, no momento da admissão e durante a evolução em unidade de emergência, através de escore clínico e medidas de saturação arterial de oxigênio por oximetria de pulso e do pico de fluxo expiratório. RESULTADOS: Os valores iniciais de escore clínico, saturação arterial de oxigênio medida por oximetria de pulso e pico de fluxo expiratório apresentaram correlação com o número de inalações realizadas e a necessidade do uso de corticosteróide. As médias dos valores iniciais de escore clínico e da saturação arterial de oxigênio dos pacientes que foram internados foram estatisticamente diferentes das dos que não foram internados. Os valores iniciais de escore clínico e de saturação arterial de O2 e a existência de atendimento anterior pela mesma exacerbação foram preditivos da necessidade de hospitalização das crianças. CONCLUSÕES: A medida da saturação arterial de O2 e o escore clínico foram úteis para predizer a evolução da asma aguda em crianças. A medida do pico de fluxo expiratório é de difícil obtenção e interpretação nessa condição e demonstrou ter pouca aplicação prática.

Is severity assessment after one hour of treatment better for predicting the need for admission in acute asthma?

AIM

To determine if severity assessment after 1 h of treatment is better than assessment at presentation for predicting the requirement for hospital admission for emergency department (ED) patients with acute asthma.

METHODS

Prospective, observational study conducted in 36 Australian ED for a 2-week period in 2001 involving patients aged 1-55 years presenting with asthma. Data collected included severity assessment according to the National Asthma Guidelines (Australia) at presentation and 1 h, and disposition. Descriptive analysis was applied.

RESULTS

720 cases were analysed. Patients with 'mild' asthma at either assessment time had a greater than 80% chance of discharge home. Patients assessed as 'severe' at either assessment had a greater than 85% chance of requiring hospital admission, but the 1 h assessment was better at predicting the need for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission. For the 'moderate' group, the initial assessment was a poor predictor of the need for admission however those who met the criteria for 'moderate' severity at 1 h had an 84% chance of requiring admission.

CONCLUSION

Assessment of asthma severity after 1 h of treatment is better than initial severity assessment for determining the need for hospital admission for patients initially assessed as having 'moderate' asthma and for predicting the need for ICU in patients initially assessed as 'severe'.

Factors associated with emergency department visits due to acute asthma

It is important to identify characteristics related to poor disease control and frequent visits to the emergency department (ED). The objective of the present study was to compare the characteristics of patients attending the adult ED for treatment of asthma exacerbation with those attending an asthma specialist clinic (AC) in the same hospital, and to determine the factors associated with frequent visits to the ED. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients (12 years and older) attending the ED (N = 86) and the AC (N = 86). Significantly more ED patients than AC patients reported ED visits in the past year (95.3 vs 48.8%; P < 0.001) and had difficulty performing work (81.4 vs 49.4%; P < 0.001. Significantly more AC than ED patents had been treated with inhaled corticosteroids (75.6 vs 18.6%; P < 0.001) used to increase or start steroid therapy when an attack was perceived (46.5 vs 20.9%; P < 0.001) and correctly used a metered-dose inhaler (50.0 vs 11.6%; P < 0.001). The history of hospital admissions (odds ratio, OR, 4.00) and use of inhaled corticosteroids (OR, 0.27) were associated with frequent visits to the ED. In conclusion, ED patients were more likely than AC patients to be dependent on the acute use of the ED, were significantly less knowledgeable about asthma management and were more likely to suffer more severe disease. ED patients should be considered an important target for asthma education. Facilitating the access to ambulatory care facilities might serve to reduce asthma morbidity.