Atualização na terapêutica da calcinose em dermatomiosite

Calcinosis in Juvenile Dermatomyositis-Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We performed a systematic review of the literature on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory characterization, and treatment of calcinosis in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). A qualitative systematic review was conducted from January 1975 to April 2023 according to the PRISMA protocol using three electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were analyzed based on the following eligibility criteria: at least one combination of the terms described in the search strategy appeared in the title, written in English, Portuguese, or Spanish, and addressed the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis. Systematic or scoping reviews, letters, clinical images, book chapters, abstracts, inflammatory myopathy in other connective tissue diseases, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in adults, and purely qualitative studies were excluded.

RECENT FINDINGS

Seventy-five studies were included. According to the literature, calcinosis is common in women, around five years old, with three years of disease in association with osteoarticular, cutaneous, pulmonary manifestations, and fever. The pathogenesis is still unknown, but the participation of interleukin 1 and 6, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and innate immunity dysregulation seem to be involved. Common autoantibodies are anti-NXP-2, anti-MDA-5, and anti-Mi-2, and their treatment remains controversial. Prospective, randomized, controlled studies are needed to evaluate treatment protocols and map the natural history of this serious complication. Calcinosis seems to be more common in White female children with muscle weakness, fever, arthritis, severe pulmonary, and skin involvement with anti-NXP-2, anti-MDA-5, and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies. The multitargets and aggressive treatment is recommended.

Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease Secondary to Autoimmune Diseases: How to Recognize Them?

The diagnostic assessment of patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) can be challenging due to the large number of possible causes. Moreover, the diagnostic approach can be limited by the severity of the disease, which may not allow invasive exams. To overcome this issue, the referral centers for ILD organized Multidisciplinary Teams (MDTs), including physicians and experts in complementary discipline, to discuss the management of doubtful cases of ILD. MDT is currently considered the gold standard for ILD diagnosis, but it is not often simple to organize and, furthermore, rheumatologists are still not always included. In fact, even if rheumatologic conditions represent a common cause of ILD, they are sometimes difficult to recognize, considering the variegated clinical features and their association with all possible radiographic patterns of ILD. The first objective of this review is to describe the clinical, laboratory, and instrumental tests that can drive a diagnosis toward a possible rheumatic disease. The secondary objective is to propose a set of first-line tests to perform in all patients in order to recognize any possible rheumatic conditions underlying ILD.