Beta-adrenergic-blocking agents in bronchospastic diseases: a therapeutic dilemma

Antihypertensive agents: a long way to safe drug prescribing in children

Recently updated clinical guidelines have highlighted the gaps in our understanding and management of pediatric hypertension. With increased recognition and diagnosis of pediatric hypertension, the use of antihypertensive agents is also likely to increase. Drug selection to treat hypertension in the pediatric patient population remains challenging. This is primarily due to a lack of large, well-designed pediatric safety and efficacy trials, limited understanding of pharmacokinetics in children, and unknown risk of prolonged exposure to antihypertensive therapies. With newer legislation providing financial incentives for conducting clinical trials in children, along with publication of pediatric-focused guidelines, literature available for antihypertensive agents in pediatrics has increased over the last 20 years. The objective of this article is to review the literature for safety and efficacy of commonly prescribed antihypertensive agents in pediatrics. Thus far, the most data to support use in children was found for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), and calcium channel blockers (CCB). Several gaps were noted in the literature, particularly for beta blockers, vasodilators, and the long-term safety profile of antihypertensive agents in children. Further clinical trials are needed to guide safe and effective prescribing in the pediatric population.

Takotsubo cardiomyopathy: A known unknown foe of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Patients with uncontrolled asthma are at a greater risk of asthma attacks requiring emergency room visits or hospital admissions. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy is potentially a significant complication in a course of status asthmaticus.

CASE STUDY

We describe a 43-year-old female patient who presented with status asthmaticus that was further complicated with takotsubo cardiomyopathy.

RESULTS

Recognizing apical ballooning syndrome is challenging in patients with a history of respiratory disease because the symptoms of the last entity may complicate the diagnostic approach. It is difficult to distinguish clinically apical ballooning syndrome from the acute airway exacerbation itself. Both asthma and takotsubo cardiomyopathy share the same clinical presentation with dyspnea and chest tightness. In our patient, the electrocardiographic abnormalities, the rapidly reversible distinctive characteristics of echocardiography, and the modest elevation of serum cardiac biomarkers levels, in combination with the presence of a stress trigger (severe asthma attack), strongly supported the diagnosis of broken heart syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should re-evaluate asthma management and be aware of the complications associated with asthma attacks such as stress-induced cardiomyopathy.

Asthma in the elderly: Current understanding and future research needs--a report of a National Institute on Aging (NIA) workshop

Asthma in the elderly is underdiagnosed and undertreated, and there is a paucity of knowledge on the subject. The National Institute on Aging convened this workshop to identify what is known and what gaps in knowledge remain and suggest research directions needed to improve the understanding and care of asthma in the elderly. Asthma presenting at an advanced age often has similar clinical and physiologic consequences as seen with younger patients, but comorbid illnesses and the psychosocial effects of aging might affect the diagnosis, clinical presentation, and care of asthma in this population. At least 2 phenotypes exist among elderly patients with asthma; those with longstanding asthma have more severe airflow limitation and less complete reversibility than those with late-onset asthma. Many challenges exist in the recognition and treatment of asthma in the elderly. Furthermore, the pathophysiologic mechanisms of asthma in the elderly are likely to be different from those seen in young asthmatic patients, and these differences might influence the clinical course and outcomes of asthma in this population.

[Use of beta blockers in various clinical states]

INTRODUCTION

According to the convincing evidence, a decline in mortality rate has been achieved with beta-blockers in patients with an acute myocardial infarction and in post-infarction follow-up. In fact, there has been a clear reduction of sudden coronary death. The necessary condition for the efficiency of beta-blockers is an early use. They are also a medication of choice for angina after an infarction. The objective of this work was to evaluate the use of beta-blockers after a myocardial infarction in various clinical states and to eliminate doubts concerning their prescription.

BETA BLOCKERS

Even in conditions considered contraindications for administration of beta blockers such as old age, diabetes, non-Q-wave myocardial infarction, peripheral vascular disease, arterial disease, heart insufficiency; ventricular arrhythmias, renal disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and depression, patients benefit from beta blockers when they are given along with a right choice of the medication and a regular followup of the patient. Preference is given to cardioselective beta blockers in patients with diabetes or lung disease. Beta-blockers do not cause long-term lipid alterations. Therefore, the matter of clinically significant alterations of lipids or blood glucose levels should not need further consideration as a problem of the treatment of diabetics.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Investigations have proved that the use of beta-blockers reduces the development of cerebrovascular accidents, heart insufficiency and hypertension. Despite strong arguments and numerous recommendations, beta-blockers have not been accepted to a sufficient extent as an integral part of treatment of acute coronary syndrome and related diseases, to the detriment of many lost lives and in spite of favourable pharmaco-economic aspect.

Pulmonary effects of nebivolol

The pharmacological control of arterial hypertension is a very frequent issue in clinical practice and some critical aspects can arise in particular circumstances and with particular molecules. In the case of hypertensive subjects with respiratory comorbidities, when first introduced, these beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists were described as affecting airway patency as a result of their antagonism against beta(2)-adrenergic receptors within airway muscles. New molecules with a better respiratory tolerability were subsequently designed in order to overcome the narrow therapeutic window of first-generation beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists. Nebivolol is a third-generation beta-adrenergic receptor antagonist with high beta(1)-selective adrenergic receptor antagonism and vasodilating properties that induces a substantial decrease of arterial pressure in hypertensive subjects while preserving their left ventricular function. Respiratory effects of nebivolol have been investigated in animal models, in healthy volunteers and in clinical trials carried out on patients suffering from bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In contrast to older compounds, nebivolol, which modulates the endogenous production of nitric oxide and affects oxidative cascade, proved clinically well tolerated in terms of respiratory outcomes in this type of subject. Moreover, due to the substantial dissociation between its cardiac and pulmonary activity, nebivolol confirmed a very good safety profile when regularly administered to hypertensive subjects with obstructive respiratory comorbidities.

Ivabradine: beyond heart rate control

Chronic stable angina pectoris (CSAP) usually occurs in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) that affects one or more large epicardial arteries. It results when myocardial perfusion is insufficient to meet cardiac metabolic demand. Elevated heart rate (HR) is an important factor in the development of myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris. The pharmacologic agents most commonly administered in the treatment of CSAP are beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers (CCBs). However, the use of beta-blockers is limited by poor compliance related to contraindications and comorbidities, especially in elderly patients. Ivabradine is a new selective HR-lowering agent that selectively inhibits the pacemaker current I (f) in the sinus atrial node. In several randomized controlled trials, ivabradine 5-10 mg twice daily has demonstrated equivalent anti-ischemic and anti-anginal activity to beta-blockers and CCBs, with a good safety and tolerability profile. Although ivabradine has been shown not to improve cardiac outcomes in patients with stable CAD and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, it may be used to reduce the incidence of CAD outcomes in a subgroup of patients with HR > or =70 bpm. The aim of this short review is to summarize the use of ivabradine in the treatment of CSAP, and its potential utility in atherosclerosis, primitive and dilatative cardiomyopathy, and arrhythmias, such as postural tachycardia syndrome and inappropriate sinus tachycardia, where exclusive lowering of elevated HR may prove beneficial.

Effects of ivabradine on allograft function and exercise performance in heart transplant recipients with permanent sinus tachycardia

Aim of this retrospective analysis was to evaluate the effects of ivabradine given primarily as a heart rate-lowering agent on allograft function and cardiopulmonary performance in heart transplant recipients with permanent sinus tachycardia. Starting May 2006, 26 heart transplant recipients with permanent sinus tachycardia received ivabradine (5 mg bid). It was discontinued early in 3 patients (11.5%) due to adverse events. In the remaining 23 patients, resting heart rate (HR) was significantly lowered from 106.3 +/- 9.1 to 82.2 +/- 6.3 bpm after 3 weeks of treatment. The effect remained constant during the remaining treatment period, whereas resting blood pressure was not affected. After 12 weeks of ivabradine treatment, the corrected QT interval was significantly reduced into the range seen in normal individuals. Left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic posterior wall thickness, LV mass and LV mass index were also found to have decreased significantly. There was a trend to improvement of cardiopulmonary performance and LV ejection fraction, both of which did not reach statistical significance, however. It may be concluded that ivabradine successfully reduced the resting HR of heart transplant recipients with sinus tachycardia without negatively influencing the blood pressure. The definitive impact of ivabradine on LV mass regression and cardiopulmonary performance require further prospective, randomized and controlled trials.

Ivabradine: the evidence of its therapeutic impact in angina

INTRODUCTION

Stable angina pectoris (SAP) is a widely prevalent disease affecting 30 000 to 40 000 per million people in Europe and the US. SAP is associated with reductions in quality of life and ability to work, and increased use of healthcare resources. Ivabradine is a drug with a unique therapeutic target, the I(f) current of the sinus node, developed for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases including SAP. It has an exclusive heart rate reducing effect, without any negative effect on left ventricular function or coronary vasodilatation.

AIMS

The aim of this paper is to review the evidence concerning the use of ivabradine in the treatment of SAP.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Ivabradine is an effective antianginal and antiischemic drug, not inferior to the beta blocker atenolol and the calcium channel antagonist (CCA) amlodipine. It decreases the frequency of angina attacks and increases the time to anginal symptoms during exercise. Because of its exclusive chronotropic effect, ivabradine is not associated with the typical adverse reactions associated with beta blockers or other antianginal drugs.

CLINICAL VALUE

Clinical evidence shows that ivabradine is a very good antiischemic and antianginal agent, being as effective as beta blockade and CCA therapy in controlling myocardial ischemia and symptoms of stable angina. Ongoing studies will determine the potential of ivabradine to improve morbidity and mortality in coronary artery disease and heart failure.

Absence of respiratory effects with ivabradine in patients with asthma

AIM

beta-Blockers are commonly prescribed for stable angina and are recommended as initial therapy. However, beta-blockers are contraindicated in patients with obstructive airway disease because of a risk of bronchoconstriction. Ivabradine is a specific heart rate-lowering agent that acts via I(f) pacemaker channels in the sinoatrial node with no beta-adrenoreceptor activity. Ivabradine has been recently approved for the treatment of stable angina. This study assessed the effects of repeated administration of ivabradine on lung function in patients with asthma.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study, 20 subjects with asthma received either oral ivabradine 10 mg b.i.d. or placebo for 4.5 days. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were designated as the main outcome variable. Diary cards were used to monitor asthma symptoms on a five-point scale, rescue medication usage, and adverse events.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean variation of FEV(1) (ivabradine P = 0.664; placebo P = 0.652) or PEFR (ivabradine P = 0.153; placebo P = 0.356) from baseline following administration of ivabradine. There was also no significant difference in maximum percent variation in FEV(1) or PEF between treatment groups (P = 0.994; FEV(1) and P = 0.704; PEF). On a similar note, there was no significant difference in asthma symptoms or rescue medication usage reported between the two groups. Adverse events were generally mild-to-moderate in intensity and no cardiovascular or serious adverse events were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that ivabradine does not affect respiratory function or symptoms in patients with asthma and therefore represents a valuable therapeutic alternative to beta-blockers for treating patients with stable angina and asthma.

Asthma in older adults

Asthma is underdiagnosed and undertreated in older adults. The classic symptoms, including episodic wheezing, shortness of breath, and chest tightness, are nonspecific in this age group. Older patients may underrate symptoms, and other diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and angina, may have similar presentations. Objective measurements of lung function always should complement the history taking and physical examination. Management of asthma in older adults should include careful monitoring, controlling triggers, optimizing and monitoring pharmacotherapy, and providing appropriate asthma education. Adverse effects to commonly used asthma medications are more common in older adults, and careful monitoring of their use and adverse effects is important.

Underutilization of Evidence-Based Therapies in Heart Failure: The Pharmacist's Role

Utilization of evidence-based therapy in the heart failure population includes implementation of heart failure treatment guidelines, interventions to improve prescribing, and inclusion of pharmacists on the multidisciplinary team. Use of treatment guidelines eases the challenge of selecting the appropriate drug and dosage; quality interventions by pharmacists can ensure optimal prescribing of therapy; and provision of care by a multidisciplinary team can improve outcomes in patients with heart failure. Evidence-based therapy, however, remains underutilized in the heart failure population. Barriers to utilization include misperceptions that various heart failure subpopulations do not need certain medical therapies, a fear of polypharmacy, inappropriate assumptions about adverse effects and contraindications, and cost. In fact, optimal prescribing of evidence-based therapy can actually reduce costs. Clearly documented processes and systems are needed to ensure that evidence-based therapy and education are available to every patient.

Pulmonary edema after electroconvulsive therapy in a patient treated for long-standing asthma with a beta2 stimulant

A 68-year-old man was scheduled to receive 8 treatments of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for severe depression. He was being treated for long-standing asthma with a beta2 stimulant, clenbuterol hydrochloride, and had experienced no asthma attack for 9 years. Although he experienced no adverse consequence in his 7 treatments, pulmonary edema ensued from his eighth treatment despite no change in anesthesia and in the technical parameters of ECT. He was treated with oxygen and intravenous hydrocortisone, after which he quickly recovered. Transient eosinophilia was observed, but clinical symptoms of asthma did not appear. Although the association between pulmonary edema and well-controlled asthma was unclear, thiopental as induction of anesthesia or esmolol as poststimulus delivery might have played a role in the event. There may be a possibility of pulmonary edema even after several uneventful ECT treatments in a patient with asthma.

Efficacy of ivabradine, a new selective If inhibitor, compared with atenolol in patients with chronic stable angina

AIMS

Ivabradine, a new I(f) inhibitor which acts specifically on the pacemaker activity of the sinoatrial node, is a pure heart rate lowering agent. Ivabradine has shown anti-ischaemic and anti-anginal activity in a placebo-controlled trial. The objective of this study was to compare the anti-anginal and anti-ischaemic effects of ivabradine and the beta-blocker atenolol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a double-blinded trial, 939 patients with stable angina were randomized to receive ivabradine 5 mg bid for 4 weeks and then either 7.5 or 10 mg bid for 12 weeks or atenolol 50 mg od for 4 weeks and then 100 mg od for 12 weeks. Patients underwent treadmill exercise tests at randomization (M(0)) and after 4 (M(1)) and 16 (M(4)) weeks of therapy. Increases in total exercise duration (TED) at trough at M(4) were 86.8+/-129.0 and 91.7+/-118.8 s with ivabradine 7.5 and 10 mg, respectively and 78.8+/-133.4 s with atenolol 100 mg. Mean differences (SE) when compared with atenolol 100 mg were 10.3 (9.4) and 15.7 (9.5) s in favour of ivabradine 7.5 and 10 mg (P<0.001 for non-inferiority). TED at M(1) improved by 64.2+/-104.0 s with ivabradine 5 mg and by 60.0+/-114.4 s with atenolol 50 mg (P<0.001 for non-inferiority). Non-inferiority of ivabradine was shown at all doses and for all criteria. The number of angina attacks was decreased by two-thirds with both ivabradine and atenolol.

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine is as effective as atenolol in patients with stable angina.

Synthesis of 4-(1-oxo-isoindoline) and 4-(5,6-dimethoxy-1-oxo-isoindoline)-substituted phenoxypropanolamines and their β1-, β2-adrenergic receptor binding studies

Phenoxypropanolamines with 1-oxo-isoindoline and 5,6-dimethoxy-1-oxo-isoindoline groups at the para position were synthesized. beta1, beta2-Adrenergic receptor binding affinities for the synthesized compounds were tested and compared with propranolol and atenolol. It was found that the incorporation of para-amidic functionality within the 1-oxo-isoindoline ring and 5,6-dimethoxy-1-oxo-isoindoline ring system led to a high degree of cardioselectivity in the phenoxypropanolamines. Two of the compounds and possessed beta1-adrenergic receptor affinity comparable with that of atenolol and both showed a better cardioselectivity than atenolol. Both and are undergoing further pharmacological evaluation.

Medications as asthma triggers

Certain medications can generate asthma symptoms, with the potential to cause considerable morbidity. This article focuses on the common drugs that have the potential to cause distinct respiratory reactions in asthmatics: aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, beta-blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The means by which these medications can trigger asthma vary in terms of acuity of onset, severity, and the mechanisms involved. The general and most practical approach is avoidance and cautious use of these drugs in asthmatics. However, these classes of medications can exert a major role in the management of common and serious diseases. Fortunately, controller therapy for asthma and alternative or more selective medications for the treatment of these conditions are now available.

Perioperative use of beta-blocker in noncardiac surgery: a multicenter educational intervention to achieve best practice guidelines

Perioperative cardiac ischemia and infarction are important causes of morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. There is now significant evidence that the use of prophylactic beta-adrenergic antagonists among selected patients at risk for perioperative cardiovascular complications is associated with a reduction in myocardial ischemia and cardiac events. Furthermore, consensus guidelines have incorporated the findings of recent studies and provide recommendations for the appropriate utilization of beta-adrenergic antagonists among selected patients. Despite these guidelines, it is unknown to what extent these recommendations have become translated into clinical practice. After measuring perioperative beta-blocker use among participating hospitals within the New York Presbyterian Health Network, we developed a multicenter educational intervention to improve the overall utilization of beta-adrenergic prophylactic therapy in accordance with best practice guidelines. The literature supporting the development of this intervention is presented in this paper, along with the tools that are currently being used for decision support across an academic healthcare network.

Asthma in the elderly

Asthma is common in the elderly population and the differences between younger and older asthmatics should be appreciated (Table 2). Asthma is frequently overlooked in the geriatric population. Objective measures of pulmonary function can aid in a prompt diagnosis and lead to effective treatment and improved quality of life. Because smoking is an important risk factor for asthma-like symptoms of wheezing, cough, and sputum production, asthma is frequently confused with COPD. When airflow obstruction is found, attempts to demonstrate reversibility can uncover an asthmatic component to the disease. In patients who have asthma symptoms and no airflow obstruction, methacholine testing is helpful. When a normal methacholine challenge is present, a diagnosis of asthma can be excluded and the physician can pursue other diagnostic considerations such as heart failure, chronic aspiration syndrome, pulmonary embolic disease, and carcinoma of the lung. The onset of wheezing, shortness of breath, and cough in an elderly patient is likely to cause concern. Although the adage "all that wheezes is not asthma" is true at any age, it is especially true in the elderly. Diagnosis based on objective measures is essential.

Beta 1-adrenoceptor selectivity of nebivolol and bisoprolol. A comparison of [3H]CGP 12.177 and [125I]iodocyanopindolol binding studies

There is an ongoing discussion on whether or not high beta(1)-adrenoceptor selectivity of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists may be favorable in the treatment of patients with heart failure. The present study compared the beta(1)-adrenoceptor selectivity of nebivolol and bisoprolol with that of carvedilol in the human myocardium, using a binding assay in conjunction with either the hydrophilic ligand (+/-)-[3H]4-(3-tertiarybutylamino-2-hydroxypropoxy)-benzimidazole-2-on HCl ([3H]CGP 12.177) or the lipophilic ligand [125I]iodocyanopindolol as radiolabeled compound. Measurements were made using membrane preparations obtained from identical nonfailing donor hearts. beta-adrenoceptor density was found to be slightly higher when [125I]iodocyanopindolol was used compared to [3H]CGP 12.177 (256+/-15 and 213+/-18 fmol/mg protein, respectively). When the highly beta(1)-adrenoceptor-selective compound 2-hydroxy-5-(2-(hydroxy-3-(4((1-methyl-4-trifluoromethyl)-1-H-imidazol-2-yl)-phenoxy)-propyl)-aminoethoxyl)-benzamide (CGP 20.712A) and the highly beta(2)-adrenoceptor-selective compound erythro-(+/-)-1-(7-methylindan-4-yloyl)-3-isopropylaminobutan-2-ol HCl (ICI 118.551) were used in competition experiments, a similar proportion of beta(1)-adrenoceptors was seen for [3H]CGP 12.177 (69.3+/-1.6%) and for [125I]iodocyanopindolol (67.0+/-2.1%). K(i)(beta(1)) and K(i)(beta(2)) were obtained in the presence of 50 nM ICI 118.551 and 300 nM CGP 20.712A. The rank order of beta(1)-adrenoceptor selectivity (K(i)(beta(2))/K(i)(beta(1)) ratio) was nebivolol (for [3H]CGP 12.177 46.1 and for [125I]iodocyanopindolol 22.5)>bisoprolol (13.1 and 6.4)>carvedilol (0.65 and 0.41). To investigate whether in vivo metabolized nebivolol retains high beta(1)-adrenoceptor selectivity, serum specimens were collected before and 2 h after oral administration of 5 mg nebivolol. The samples were used for [125I]iodocyanopindolol binding studies with the myocardial membrane preparations. In these samples, the binding of [125I]iodocyanopindolol to beta(1)-adrenoceptors was inhibited by 46.4+/-5.3%, whereas the binding to beta(2)-adrenoceptors was inhibited by 20.5+/-1.1% compared to that of control samples. It is concluded that nebivolol is approximately 3.5 times more beta(1)-adrenoceptor-selective than bisoprolol in the human myocardium. Furthermore, in vivo metabolized nebivolol retains beta(1)-adrenoceptor selectivity.

Preoperative stress testing: new guidelines

To date, there are no well controlled trials in the literature that demonstrate an outcome benefit using stress testing as a screening procedure before noncardiac surgery. Perioperative beta-blockade significantly decreases morbidity and mortality, and thus reduces any potential benefit stress testing may have in identifying patients who may advance to more invasive treatment. Preoperative percutaneous coronary intervention has unproven perioperative benefit, and coronary artery bypass graft carries risks that often offset the risk of noncardiac surgery. Unless an outcome benefit from cardiac testing and procedures can be demonstrated in a properly designed trial, their use should generally be restricted to situations in which symptoms or other cardiac findings warrant cardiac evaluation and treatment, regardless of upcoming surgery.

The pharmacologic treatment of uncomplicated arterial hypertension in patients with airway dysfunction

Because many antihypertensive drugs can affect airway function, the treatment of hypertension in patients with airway dysfunction is complex. For example, the worsening or precipitation of asthma by beta-adrenoceptor antagonists is well-recognized, but beta(1)-adrenoceptor blockers that exert mild beta(2)-agonist effects, and those that modulate the endogenous production of nitric oxide, affect airway function to a lesser extent. Therapy with selective alpha(1)-blockers is not contraindicated in cases of chronic airway obstruction. Conversely, alpha(2)-agonists must not be given to asthmatic subjects because they can adversely affect the bronchi. Calcium channel blockers do not exert severe side effects on the airways. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may cause cough and exacerbate or even induce asthma; however, angiotensin II type I (AT(1)) antagonists do not cause cough. 5-Hydroxytryptamine modifiers such as urapidil are a treatment option for patients with chronic airway obstruction. In patients with airway dysfunction, we suggest treatment with thiazide diuretics as the initial drug choice, and calcium channel blockers if the response is poor. In the case of no response, calcium channel blockers alone must be used. However, there is no strict rule because individual patients may respond differently to individual drugs and drug combinations. Consequently, it is important to adopt a flexible approach. For patients who are unresponsive to the aforementioned drugs, AT(1) receptor antagonists, newer beta(1)-adrenoceptor-blocking agents with ancillary properties (eg, celiprolol or nebivolol), and/or vasodilators can be considered.

Effectiveness of beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the use and effectiveness of beta-blocker therapy after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) for elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma.

BACKGROUND

Because patients with COPD and asthma have largely been excluded from clinical trials of beta-blocker therapy for AMI, the extent to which these patients would benefit from beta-blocker therapy after AMI is not well defined.

METHODS

Using data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project, we examined the relationship between discharge use of beta-blockers and one-year mortality in patients with COPD or asthma who were not using beta-agonists, patients with COPD or asthma who were concurrently using beta-agonists and patients with evidence of severe disease (use of prednisone or previous hospitalization for COPD or asthma) compared with patients without COPD or asthma.

RESULTS

Of 54,962 patients without contraindications to beta-blockers, patients with COPD or asthma (20%) were significantly less likely to be prescribed beta-blockers at discharge after AMI. After adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, we found that beta-blockers were associated with lower one-year mortality in patients with COPD or asthma who were not on beta-agonist therapy (relative risk [RR] = 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73 to 1.00), similar to patients without COPD or asthma (RR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.92). A survival benefit for beta-blockers was not found among patients concurrently using beta-agonists or with severe COPD or asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Beta-blocker therapy after AMI may be beneficial for COPD or asthma patients with mild disease. A survival benefit was not found for elderly AMI patients with more severe pulmonary disease.

Metoprolol CR/XL in the Treatment of Chronic Heart Failure

Metoprolol CR/XL (metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets) is a beta1-selective agent that improved survival and reduced hospitalization among patients with New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure in a randomized trial. Metoprolol CR/XL differs from conventional metoprolol tartrate with respect to pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that may be clinically important in patients with heart failure. A thorough patient evaluation should be performed to determine optimal dosage and titration of this drug, as with any beta-blocker, and to assess the potential for drug-drug or drug-disease interactions. By applying knowledge of drug-specific characteristics and designing therapy for each individual patient, improvement in patient outcomes can be realized with metoprolol CR/XL.

Comparison of the effects of single oral doses of nebivolol and celiprolol on airways in patients with mild asthma

OBJECTIVE

The respiratory effects of nebivolol, a new selective ss(1)-adrenergic blocking agent, and celiprolol, a ss-blocker possessing strong ss(1)-adrenoceptor antagonist and mild ss(2)-agonist properties, were investigated in 12 patients with mild asthma.

DESIGN

Changes in several spirometric indexes (FVC, FEV(1), and forced expiratory flow rate at 50% of FVC) were measured. The interaction with the bronchodilator effect of the ss(2)-adrenoceptor-selective agonist albuterol also was investigated.

RESULTS

The effect of both nebivolol and celiprolol on FEV(1) was considered to be significant (p < 0.05). The administration of nebivolol and celiprolol, but not of placebo, elicited a decrease in FEV(1): mean maximum difference for nebivolol, -0.272 L (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.402 to -0.142); mean maximum difference for celiprolol, -0.193 L (95% CI, -0.316 to -0.071); mean maximum difference for placebo, -0.0001 L (95% CI, -0.087 to 0.085). The inhalation of albuterol, up to a dose of 800 microg, significantly (p < 0.05) improved FEV(1), but the values after nebivolol and celiprolol administration were lower than the initial values. Both ss-blockers caused equal changes in heart rate, systolic BP, and diastolic BP.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences between the respiratory actions of the two active drugs.