1
|
Nemzow L, Phillippi MA, Kanagaraj K, Shuryak I, Taveras M, Wu X, Turner HC. Validation of a blood biomarker panel for machine learning-based radiation biodosimetry in juvenile and adult C57BL/6 mice. Sci Rep 2024; 14:23872. [PMID: 39396080 PMCID: PMC11470949 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74953-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Following a large-scale radiological event, timely collection of samples from all potentially exposed individuals may be precluded, and high-throughput bioassays capable of rapid and individualized dose assessment several days post-exposure will be essential for population triage and efficient implementation of medical treatment. The objective of this work was to validate the performance of a biomarker panel of radiosensitive intracellular leukocyte proteins (ACTN1, DDB2, and FDXR) and blood cell counts (CD19+ B-cells and CD3+ T-cells) for retrospective classification of exposure and dose estimation up to 7 days post-exposure in an in-vivo C57BL/6 mouse model. Juvenile and adult C57BL/6 mice of both sexes were total body irradiated with 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 Gy, peripheral blood was collected 1, 4, and 7-days post-exposure, and individual blood biomarkers were quantified by imaging flow cytometry. An ensemble machine learning platform was used to identify the strongest predictor variables and combine them for biodosimetry outputs. This approach generated successful exposure classification (ROC AUC = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.97) and quantitative dose reconstruction (R2 = 0.79, RMSE = 0.68 Gy, MAE = 0.53 Gy), supporting the potential utility of the proposed biomarker assay for determining exposure and received dose in an individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Nemzow
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Michelle A Phillippi
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karthik Kanagaraj
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Maria Taveras
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xuefeng Wu
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Helen C Turner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kanagaraj K, Phillippi MA, Ober EH, Shuryak I, Kleiman NJ, Olson J, Schaaf G, Cline JM, Turner HC. BAX and DDB2 as biomarkers for acute radiation exposure in the human blood ex vivo and non-human primate models. Sci Rep 2024; 14:19345. [PMID: 39164366 PMCID: PMC11336173 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-69852-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024] Open
Abstract
There are currently no available FDA-cleared biodosimetry tools for rapid and accurate assessment of absorbed radiation dose following a radiation/nuclear incident. Previously we developed a protein biomarker-based FAST-DOSE bioassay system for biodosimetry. The aim of this study was to integrate an ELISA platform with two high-performing FAST-DOSE biomarkers, BAX and DDB2, and to construct machine learning models that employ a multiparametric biomarker strategy for enhancing the accuracy of exposure classification and radiation dose prediction. The bioassay showed 97.92% and 96% accuracy in classifying samples in human and non-human primate (NHP) blood samples exposed ex vivo to 0-5 Gy X-rays, respectively up to 48 h after exposure, and an adequate correlation between reconstructed and actual dose in the human samples (R2 = 0.79, RMSE = 0.80 Gy, and MAE = 0.63 Gy) and NHP (R2 = 0.80, RMSE = 0.78 Gy, and MAE = 0.61 Gy). Biomarker measurements in vivo from four NHPs exposed to a single 2.5 Gy total body dose showed a persistent upregulation in blood samples collected on days 2 and 5 after irradiation. The data indicates that using a combined approach of targeted proteins can increase bioassay sensitivity and provide a more accurate dose prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karthik Kanagaraj
- Center for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Michelle A Phillippi
- Center for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Elizabeth H Ober
- Center for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Norman J Kleiman
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - John Olson
- Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - George Schaaf
- Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - J Mark Cline
- Department of Pathology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Helen C Turner
- Center for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blakely WF, Port M, Ostheim P, Abend M. Radiation Research Society Journal-based Historical Review of the Use of Biomarkers for Radiation Dose and Injury Assessment: Acute Health Effects Predictions. Radiat Res 2024; 202:185-204. [PMID: 38936821 DOI: 10.1667/rade-24-00121.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
A multiple-parameter based approach using radiation-induced clinical signs and symptoms, hematology changes, cytogenetic chromosomal aberrations, and molecular biomarkers changes after radiation exposure is used for biodosimetry-based dose assessment. In the current article, relevant milestones from Radiation Research are documented that forms the basis of the current consensus approach for diagnostics after radiation exposure. For example, in 1962 the use of cytogenetic chromosomal aberration using the lymphocyte metaphase spread dicentric assay for biodosimetry applications was first published in Radiation Research. This assay is now complimented using other cytogenetic chromosomal aberration assays (i.e., chromosomal translocations, cytokinesis-blocked micronuclei, premature chromosome condensation, γ-H2AX foci, etc.). Changes in blood cell counts represent an early-phase biomarker for radiation exposures. Molecular biomarker changes have evolved to include panels of organ-specific plasma proteomic and blood-based gene expression biomarkers for radiation dose assessment. Maturation of these assays are shown by efforts for automated processing and scoring, development of point-of-care diagnostics devices, service laboratories inter-comparison exercises, and applications for dose and injury assessments in radiation accidents. An alternative and complementary approach has been advocated with the focus to de-emphasize "dose" and instead focus on predicting acute or delayed health effects. The same biomarkers used for dose estimation (e.g., lymphocyte counts) can be used to directly predict the later developing severity degree of acute health effects without performing dose estimation as an additional or intermediate step. This review illustrates contributing steps toward these developments published in Radiation Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William F Blakely
- Scientific Research Department, Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Matthias Port
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Michael Abend
- Bundeswehr Institute of Radiobiology, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fenech M, Holland N, Zeiger E, Chang PW, Kirsch-Volders M, Bolognesi C, Stopper H, Knudsen LE, Knasmueller S, Nersesyan A, Thomas P, Dhillon V, Deo P, Franzke B, Andreassi MG, Laffon B, Wagner KH, Norppa H, da Silva J, Volpi EV, Wilkins R, Bonassi S. Objectives and achievements of the HUMN project on its 26th anniversary. MUTATION RESEARCH. REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH 2024; 794:108511. [PMID: 39233049 DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2024.108511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 08/22/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/06/2024]
Abstract
Micronuclei (MN) are a nuclear abnormality that occurs when chromosome fragments or whole chromosomes are not properly segregated during mitosis and consequently are excluded from the main nuclei and wrapped within nuclear membrane to form small nuclei. This maldistribution of genetic material leads to abnormal cellular genomes which may increase risk of developmental defects, cancers, and accelerated aging. Despite the potential importance of MN as biomarkers of genotoxicity, very little was known about the optimal way to measure MN in humans, the normal ranges of values of MN in healthy humans and the prospective association of MN with developmental and degenerative diseases prior to the 1980's. In the early 1980's two important methods to measure MN in humans were developed namely, the cytokinesis-block MN (CBMN) assay using peripheral blood lymphocytes and the Buccal MN assay that measures MN in epithelial cells from the oral mucosa. These discoveries greatly increased interest to use MN assays in human studies. In 1997 the Human Micronucleus (HUMN) project was founded to initiate an international collaboration to (i) harmonise and standardise the techniques used to perform the lymphocyte CBMN assay and the Buccal MN assay; (ii) establish and collate databases of MN frequency in human populations world-wide which also captured demographic, lifestyle and environmental genotoxin exposure data and (iii) use these data to identify the most important variables affecting MN frequency and to also determine whether MN predict disease risk. In this paper we briefly describe the achievements of the HUMN project during the period from the date of its foundation on 9th September 1997 until its 26th Anniversary in 2023, which included more than 200 publications and 23 workshops world-wide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fenech
- Health and Biomedical Innovation, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia; Genome Health Foundation, North Brighton, SA 5048, Australia.
| | - Nina Holland
- Center for Environmental Research and Community Health (CERCH), University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
| | | | - Peter Wushou Chang
- Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhwa, Taiwan; TUFTS University Medical School, Boston, USA.
| | - Micheline Kirsch-Volders
- Laboratory for Cell Genetics, Department Biology, Faculty of Sciences and Bio-engineering Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, Brussels 1050, Belgium.
| | - Claudia Bolognesi
- Environmental Carcinogenesis Unit, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Helga Stopper
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg 97080, Germany.
| | - Lisbeth E Knudsen
- Department of Public Health, Section of Environmental Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Siegfried Knasmueller
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Armen Nersesyan
- Institute of Cancer Research, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Philip Thomas
- CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
| | - Varinderpal Dhillon
- Health and Biomedical Innovation, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
| | - Permal Deo
- Health and Biomedical Innovation, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, Australia.
| | - Bernhard Franzke
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Austria.
| | | | - Blanca Laffon
- Universidade da Coruña, Grupo DICOMOSA, CICA-Centro Interdisciplinar de Química e Bioloxía, Departamento de Psicología, Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación, and Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de A Coruña (INIBIC), Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña (CHUAC), Sergas, A Coruña, Spain.
| | - Karl-Heinz Wagner
- Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Vienna, Austria; Research Platform Active Ageing, University of Vienna, Austria.
| | - Hannu Norppa
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki 00250, Finland.
| | - Juliana da Silva
- Laboratory of Genetic Toxicology, La Salle University (UniLaSalle), Canoas, RS 92010-000, Brazil; PPGBM, Federal University of Brazil (UFRGS), Porto Alegre 91501-970, Brazil.
| | - Emanuela V Volpi
- School of Life Sciences, University of Westminster, 115 New Cavendish Street, London W1W6UW, UK.
| | - Ruth Wilkins
- Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Health Canada 775 Brookfield Rd, Ottawa K1A 1C1, Canada.
| | - Stefano Bonassi
- Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome 00166, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schunck C, Lörch T, Kowalski R, Porter M, Mahnke R, Capaccio C, Perrier J, Damer K. A standardized and automated CBMN assay for biological dosimetry: the CytoRADx™ system. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2023; 199:1516-1519. [PMID: 37721072 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Major nuclear accidents can result in many casualties, and it is important to assess the absorbed radiation dose to support treatment decisions. Biological dosimetry (BD) allows retrospective determination of dose using biological markers. To achieve consistent cytogenetic assay results across labs, the current practice requires each lab to generate periodic, unique calibration curves using in vitro dose-effect experiments. Here, we present CytoRADx™, a standardized biodosimetry system that integrates automated dose calculation in a high-throughput platform without the need for lab-specific calibration curves. CytoRADx consists of an improved, standardized Cytokinesis Block Micronucleus assay combined with automated analysis utilizing an established slide scanning device. We tested CytoRADx for accuracy and reproducibility across different instruments, sites, days and operators. Our results demonstrate that CytoRADx eliminates the time-consuming, lab-specific calibration curves, allowing multiple laboratories to obtain consistent results and to distribute the testing burden in the event of a large-scale accident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Lörch
- MetaSystems Hard & Software GmbH, Altlussheim, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghandhi SA, Morton SR, Shuryak I, Lee Y, Soni RK, Perrier JR, Bakke J, Gahagan J, Bujold K, Authier S, Amundson SA, Brenner DJ, Nishita D, Chang P, Turner HC. Longitudinal multi-omic changes in the transcriptome and proteome of peripheral blood cells after a 4 Gy total body radiation dose to Rhesus macaques. BMC Genomics 2023; 24:139. [PMID: 36944971 PMCID: PMC10031949 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09230-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-human primates, such as Rhesus macaques, are a powerful model for studies of the cellular and physiological effects of radiation, development of radiation biodosimetry, and for understanding the impact of radiation on human health. Here, we study the effects of 4 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) at the molecular level out to 28 days and at the cytogenetic level out to 56 days after exposure. We combine the global transcriptomic and proteomic responses in peripheral whole blood to assess the impact of acute TBI exposure at extended times post irradiation. RESULTS The overall mRNA response in the first week reflects a strong inflammatory reaction, infection response with neutrophil and platelet activation. At 1 week, cell cycle arrest and re-entry processes were enriched among mRNA changes, oncogene-induced senescence and MAPK signaling among the proteome changes. Influenza life cycle and infection pathways initiated earlier in mRNA and are reflected among the proteomic changes during the first week. Transcription factor proteins SRC, TGFβ and NFATC2 were immediately induced at 1 day after irradiation with increased transcriptional activity as predicted by mRNA changes persisting up to 1 week. Cell counts revealed a mild / moderate hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) reaction to irradiation with expected lymphopenia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia that resolved within 30 days. Measurements of micronuclei per binucleated cell levels in cytokinesis-blocked T-lymphocytes remained high in the range 0.27-0.33 up to 28 days and declined to 0.1 by day 56. CONCLUSIONS Overall, we show that the TBI 4 Gy dose in NHPs induces many cellular changes that persist up to 1 month after exposure, consistent with damage, death, and repopulation of blood cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shanaz A. Ghandhi
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Shad R. Morton
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Younghyun Lee
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Rajesh K. Soni
- Proteomics and Macromolecular Crystallography Shared Resource, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, NY New York, 10032 USA
| | - Jay R. Perrier
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - James Bakke
- Biosciences Division, SRI, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Janet Gahagan
- Biosciences Division, SRI, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Kim Bujold
- Charles River Laboratory, 445 Armand-Grappier Blvd, (QC) H7V 4B3 Laval, Canada
| | - Simon Authier
- Charles River Laboratory, 445 Armand-Grappier Blvd, (QC) H7V 4B3 Laval, Canada
| | - Sally A. Amundson
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - David J. Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| | - Denise Nishita
- Biosciences Division, SRI, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Polly Chang
- Biosciences Division, SRI, 333 Ravenswood Avenue, Menlo Park, CA 94025 USA
| | - Helen C. Turner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630, W 168th street, VC11-237, New York, NY 10032 USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
M’Kacher R, Colicchio B, Junker S, El Maalouf E, Heidingsfelder L, Plesch A, Dieterlen A, Jeandidier E, Carde P, Voisin P. High Resolution and Automatable Cytogenetic Biodosimetry Using In Situ Telomere and Centromere Hybridization for the Accurate Detection of DNA Damage: An Overview. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24065699. [PMID: 36982772 PMCID: PMC10054499 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In the event of a radiological or nuclear accident, or when physical dosimetry is not available, the scoring of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes constitutes an essential tool for the estimation of the absorbed dose of the exposed individual and for effective triage. Cytogenetic biodosimetry employs different cytogenetic assays including the scoring of dicentrics, micronuclei, and translocations as well as analyses of induced premature chromosome condensation to define the frequency of chromosome aberrations. However, inherent challenges using these techniques include the considerable time span from sampling to result, the sensitivity and specificity of the various techniques, and the requirement of highly skilled personnel. Thus, techniques that obviate these challenges are needed. The introduction of telomere and centromere (TC) staining have successfully met these challenges and, in addition, greatly improved the efficiency of cytogenetic biodosimetry through the development of automated approaches, thus reducing the need for specialized personnel. Here, we review the role of the various cytogenetic dosimeters and their recent improvements in the management of populations exposed to genotoxic agents such as ionizing radiation. Finally, we discuss the emerging potentials to exploit these techniques in a wider spectrum of medical and biological applications, e.g., in cancer biology to identify prognostic biomarkers for the optimal triage and treatment of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhia M’Kacher
- Cell Environment DNA Damage R&D, Genopole, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-160878918
| | - Bruno Colicchio
- IRIMAS, Institut de Recherche en Informatique, Mathématiques, Automatique et Signal, Université de Haute-Alsace, 69093 Mulhouse, France
| | - Steffen Junker
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Elie El Maalouf
- Cell Environment DNA Damage R&D, Genopole, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France
| | | | - Andreas Plesch
- MetaSystems GmbH, Robert-Bosch-Str. 6, D-68804 Altlussheim, Germany
| | - Alain Dieterlen
- IRIMAS, Institut de Recherche en Informatique, Mathématiques, Automatique et Signal, Université de Haute-Alsace, 69093 Mulhouse, France
| | - Eric Jeandidier
- Laboratoire de Génétique, Groupe Hospitalier de la Région de Mulhouse Sud-Alsace, 69093 Mulhouse, France
| | - Patrice Carde
- Department of Hematology, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94804 Villejuif, France
| | - Philippe Voisin
- Cell Environment DNA Damage R&D, Genopole, 91000 Evry-Courcouronnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shuryak I, Nemzow L, Bacon BA, Taveras M, Wu X, Deoli N, Ponnaiya B, Garty G, Brenner DJ, Turner HC. Machine learning approach for quantitative biodosimetry of partial-body or total-body radiation exposures by combining radiation-responsive biomarkers. Sci Rep 2023; 13:949. [PMID: 36653416 PMCID: PMC9849198 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-28130-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
During a large-scale radiological event such as an improvised nuclear device detonation, many survivors will be shielded from radiation by environmental objects, and experience only partial-body irradiation (PBI), which has different consequences, compared with total-body irradiation (TBI). In this study, we tested the hypothesis that applying machine learning to a combination of radiation-responsive biomarkers (ACTN1, DDB2, FDXR) and B and T cell counts will quantify and distinguish between PBI and TBI exposures. Adult C57BL/6 mice of both sexes were exposed to 0, 2.0-2.5 or 5.0 Gy of half-body PBI or TBI. The random forest (RF) algorithm trained on ½ of the data reconstructed the radiation dose on the remaining testing portion of the data with mean absolute error of 0.749 Gy and reconstructed the product of dose and exposure status (defined as 1.0 × Dose for TBI and 0.5 × Dose for PBI) with MAE of 0.472 Gy. Among irradiated samples, PBI could be distinguished from TBI: ROC curve AUC = 0.944 (95% CI: 0.844-1.0). Mouse sex did not significantly affect dose reconstruction. These results support the hypothesis that combinations of protein biomarkers and blood cell counts can complement existing methods for biodosimetry of PBI and TBI exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Leah Nemzow
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Bezalel A Bacon
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Maria Taveras
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Xuefeng Wu
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Naresh Deoli
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, NY, USA
| | - Brian Ponnaiya
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, NY, USA
| | - Guy Garty
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, NY, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Helen C Turner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shuryak I, Royba E, Repin M, Turner HC, Garty G, Deoli N, Brenner DJ. A machine learning method for improving the accuracy of radiation biodosimetry by combining data from the dicentric chromosomes and micronucleus assays. Sci Rep 2022; 12:21077. [PMID: 36473912 PMCID: PMC9726929 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-25453-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A large-scale malicious or accidental radiological event can expose vast numbers of people to ionizing radiation. The dicentric chromosome (DCA) and cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) assays are well-established biodosimetry methods for estimating individual absorbed doses after radiation exposure. Here we used machine learning (ML) to test the hypothesis that combining automated DCA and CBMN assays will improve dose reconstruction accuracy, compared with using either cytogenetic assay alone. We analyzed 1349 blood sample aliquots from 155 donors of different ages (3-69 years) and sexes (49.1% males), ex vivo irradiated with 0-8 Gy at dose rates from 0.08 Gy/day to ≥ 600 Gy/s. We compared the performances of several state-of-the-art ensemble ML methods and found that random forest generated the best results, with R2 for actual vs. reconstructed doses on a testing data subset = 0.845, and mean absolute error = 0.628 Gy. The most important predictor variables were CBMN and DCA frequencies, and age. Removing CBMN or DCA data from the model significantly increased squared errors on testing data (p-values 3.4 × 10-8 and 1.1 × 10-6, respectively). These findings demonstrate the promising potential of combining CBMN and DCA assay data to reconstruct radiation doses in realistic scenarios of heterogeneous populations exposed to a mass-casualty radiological event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Shuryak
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Ekaterina Royba
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Mikhail Repin
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Helen C Turner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Guy Garty
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, NY, USA
| | - Naresh Deoli
- Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Irvington, NY, USA
| | - David J Brenner
- Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, VC-11-234/5, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bucher M, Weiss T, Endesfelder D, Trompier F, Ristic Y, Kunert P, Schlattl H, Giussani A, Oestreicher U. Dose Variations Using an X-Ray Cabinet to Establish in vitro Dose-Response Curves for Biological Dosimetry Assays. Front Public Health 2022; 10:903509. [PMID: 35655448 PMCID: PMC9152255 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.903509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In biological dosimetry, dose-response curves are essential for reliable retrospective dose estimation of individual exposure in case of a radiation accident. Therefore, blood samples are irradiated in vitro and evaluated based on the applied assay. Accurate physical dosimetry of the irradiation performance is a critical part of the experimental procedure and is influenced by the experimental setup, especially when X-ray cabinets are used. The aim of this study was to investigate variations and pitfalls associated with the experimental setups used to establish calibration curves in biological dosimetry with X-ray cabinets. In this study, irradiation was performed with an X-ray source (195 kV, 10 mA, 0.5 mm Cu filter, dose rate 0.52 Gy/min, 1st and 2nd half-value layer = 1.01 and 1.76 mm Cu, respectively, average energy 86.9 keV). Blood collection tubes were irradiated with a dose of 1 Gy in vertical or horizontal orientation in the center of the beam area with or without usage of an additional fan heater. To evaluate the influence of the setups, physical dose measurements using thermoluminescence dosimeters, electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry and ionization chamber as well as biological effects, quantified by dicentric chromosomes and micronuclei, were compared. This study revealed that the orientation of the sample tubes (vertical vs. horizontal) had a significant effect on the radiation dose with a variation of -41% up to +49% and contributed to a dose gradient of up to 870 mGy inside the vertical tubes due to the size of the sample tubes and the associated differences in the distance to the focal point of the tube. The number of dicentric chromosomes and micronuclei differed by ~30% between both orientations. An additional fan heater had no consistent impact. Therefore, dosimetric monitoring of experimental irradiation setups is mandatory prior to the establishment of calibration curves in biological dosimetry. Careful consideration of the experimental setup in collaboration with physicists is required to ensure traceability and reproducibility of irradiation conditions, to correlate the radiation dose and the number of aberrations correctly and to avoid systematical bias influencing the dose estimation in the frame of biological dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Bucher
- Department of Effects and Risks of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Tina Weiss
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - David Endesfelder
- Department of Effects and Risks of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Francois Trompier
- Department of External Dosimetry, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Yoann Ristic
- Department of External Dosimetry, Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - Patrizia Kunert
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Helmut Schlattl
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Augusto Giussani
- Department of Medical and Occupational Radiation Protection, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Ursula Oestreicher
- Department of Effects and Risks of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation, Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|