The role of lenvatinib in the era of immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

Bidirectional regulation of the cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase-stimulator of interferon gene pathway and its impact on hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks as the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in China, and the treatment options are limited. The cyclic guanosine monophosphate-adenosine monophosphate synthase (cGAS) activates the stimulator of interferon gene (STING) signaling pathway as a crucial immune response pathway in the cytoplasm, which detects cytoplasmic DNA to regulate innate and adaptive immune responses. As a potential therapeutic target, cGAS-STING pathway markedly inhibits tumor cell proliferation and metastasis, with its activation being particularly relevant in HCC. However, prolonged pathway activation may lead to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, which fostering the invasion or metastasis of liver tumor cells.

AIM

To investigate the dual-regulation mechanism of cGAS-STING in HCC.

METHODS

This review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The study conducted a comprehensive search for articles related to HCC on PubMed and Web of Science databases. Through rigorous screening and meticulous analysis of the retrieved literature, the research aimed to summarize and elucidate the impact of the cGAS-STING pathway on HCC tumors.

RESULTS

All authors collaboratively selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and the initial search of online databases yielded 1445 studies. After removing duplicates, the remaining 964 records were screened. Ultimately, 55 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review.

CONCLUSION

Acute inflammation can have a few inhibitory effects on cancer, while chronic inflammation generally promotes its progression. Extended cGAS-STING pathway activation will result in a suppressive tumor microenvironment.

The anti-PD-L1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody KN046 plus lenvatinib in advanced unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase II trial

This open-label phase II trial (NCT04542837) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KN046 combined with lenvatinib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and explore the potential response biomarkers. Participants received KN046 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks and lenvatinib 12 or 8 mg once daily. The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1. A total of fifty-five participants were enrolled. The results meet the pre-specified primary endpoints. No DLT was observed in the safety run-in period. The incidence of serious adverse events and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was 30.9% and 47.3%, respectively. Grade ≥3 immunotherapy-related adverse events occurred in 3 (5.5%) participants. Five (9.1%) participants discontinued treatment due to TRAEs, all of which were grade 1-2. The ORR was 45.5% (95% CI, 31.97-59.45). The median progression-free survival was 11.0 (95% CI, 8.21-15.24) months. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.4 (95% CI, 11.20-not estimable) months, and 12-month OS rate was 60.0% (95% CI, 45.87-71.55). Circulating tumor DNA status before the third cycle of treatment was associated with prognosis. In conclusion, First-line KN046 plus lenvatinib shows promising efficacy for advanced unresectable or metastatic HCC.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Family and the Immune System: Activators or Inhibitors?

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family includes key mediators of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. VEGFs are secreted by various cells of epithelial and mesenchymal origin and by some immune cells in response to physiological and pathological stimuli. In addition, immune cells express VEGF receptors and/or co-receptors and can respond to VEGFs in an autocrine or paracrine manner. This immunological role of VEGFs has opened the possibility of using the VEGF inhibitors already developed to inhibit tumor angiogenesis also in combination approaches with different immunotherapies to enhance the action of effector T lymphocytes against tumor cells. This review pursues to examine the current understanding of the interplay between VEGFs and the immune system, while identifying key areas that require further evaluation.

A Potential Pneumothorax Induced by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Case Report and Literature Review

Background and Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which target immune checkpoints in cancer cells, are increasingly used as a mainstay in anticancer treatment. The combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is also a first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, ICIs can cause immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) which range from mild to severe, potentially leading to the need for discontinuing immunotherapy. We report a case of a pneumothorax, a rare side effect caused by IrAEs. Materials and Methods: This paper reports a case of a 78-year-old male HCC patient who developed a recurrent pneumothorax, suspected to be an adverse effect of ICIs. Results: The patient was a current smoker with a 30 pack-year smoking history. Prior to initiating ICIs, a chest CT scan showed mild emphysema and fibrosis attributable to smoking. Following ICI treatment, the patient developed a recurrent pneumothorax. Further tests revealed no underlying cause for the pneumothorax other than the ICIs and smoking, and there were no signs of intrapulmonary metastasis or pneumonitis. Conclusions: When a pneumothorax occurs in a patient undergoing immunotherapy, it is important to consider it as a potential adverse effect of the treatment. Special attention should be given to the possibility that immunotherapy may exacerbate underlying lung conditions. Patients should be advised on the importance of smoking cessation. As there are currently no guidelines for resuming immunotherapy after a pneumothorax, it is crucial to weigh the risks and benefits and consider dose reduction or discontinuation of the medication.

Dual effects of targeting neuropilin-1 in lenvatinib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma: inhibition of tumor growth and angiogenesis

In the era of immunotherapy, lenvatinib (LEN) still holds an important position in the sequential treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the sustained therapeutic effect of LEN is not sufficient, and there is a need to address the development of resistance. Neuropilin-1 (NRP1) is known to act as a coreceptor for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), Met, and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2), which have been reported to be involved in LEN resistance. In this study, we used cell culture and in vivo xenograft models to evaluate the contribution of NRP1 in the acquisition of LEN resistance in HCC as well as the potential of NRP1 as a therapeutic target. LEN resistance increased EGF/EGFR and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/Met signaling in liver cancer cells and VEGFA/VEGFR2 and HGF/Met signaling in vascular endothelial cells, thereby promoting cell proliferation, cell migration, and angiogenesis. We found that activation of NRP1 is essential for the enhancement of these signaling. In addition, NRP1 inhibition combined with LEN therapy synergistically improved the antitumor effects against LEN-resistant HCC, indicating that NRP1 is an attractive therapeutic target.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrated that neuropilin-1 (NRP1) was an essential coreceptor mediating the activation of multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of resistance to lenvatinib (LEN) in HCC. The addition of NRP1 inhibition to LEN had a synergistic antitumor effect on LEN-resistant HCC in culture and in vivo xenograft models.

Role of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with extrahepatic metastases in the era of advancing systemic therapy

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS

Systemic therapy is the current standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with extrahepatic metastasis (EHM). However, some patients with HCC and EHM undergo transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to manage intrahepatic tumors. Herein, we aimed to explore the appropriateness of TACE in patients with HCC and EHM in an era of advanced systemic therapy.

METHODS

This study analyzed 248 consecutive patients with HCC and EHM (median age, 58.5 years; male, 83.5%; Child-Pugh A, 88.7%) who received TACE or systemic therapy (83 sorafenib, 49 lenvatinib, 28 immunotherapy-based) between January 2018 and January 2021.

RESULTS

Among the patients, 196 deaths were recorded during a median follow-up of 8.9 months. Patients who received systemic therapy had a higher albumin-bilirubin grade, elevated tumor markers, an increased number of intrahepatic tumors, larger-sized tumors, and more frequent portal vein invasion than those who underwent TACE. TACE was associated with longer median overall survival (OS) than sorafenib (15.1 vs. 4.7 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.1-22.2 vs. 3.7-7.3; hazard ratio [HR], 1.97; P<0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, TACE was associated with statistically similar survival outcomes to those of lenvatinib (median OS, 8.0 months; 95% CI, 6.5-11.0; HR, 1.21; P=0.411) and immunotherapies (median OS, 14.3 months; 95% CI, 9.5-27.0; HR, 1.01; P=0.973), demonstrating survival benefits equivalent to these treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HCC and EHM, TACE can provide a survival benefit comparable to that of newer systemic therapies. Accordingly, TACE remains a valuable option in this era of new systemic therapies.

Fatal intratumoral hemorrhage in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma following successful treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab: A case report

BACKGROUND

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab is emerging as the new standard for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with ongoing real-world implementation to study its effectiveness. As the use of atezolizumab/bevacizumab increases, various side effects have been reported in clinical practice, most notably increased bleeding caused by bevacizumab.

CASE SUMMARY

In this case report, we present a rare and fatal case of intratumoral hemorrhage in a patient with advanced HCC following successful treatment with atezolizumab/bevacizumab. A 63-year-old male diagnosed with HCC initially underwent four cycles of intra-arterial chemotherapy. However, follow-up abdominal computed tomography (CT) revealed disease progression. Subsequently, the treatment plan was modified to atezolizumab/bevacizumab. After the fifth cycle of atezolizumab/bevacizumab, CT showed partial regression of HCC. One week later, he visited the emergency room due to severe abrupt abdominal pain. Abdominal CT revealed focal rupture of HCC in the medial segment inferior portion with active bleeding and a large amount of hemoperitoneum. Angiography was performed on the same day, and embolization of A4 and A8 branches using lipiodol and gelfoam was implemented. Despite successful hemostasis, the patient subsequently developed liver failure and died.

CONCLUSION

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab for advanced HCC suggests that intratumoral hemorrhage may be crucial despite good tumor response after immunotherapy, emphasizing the continuous monitoring of this side effect.

Consistent efficacy of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy irrespective of PD‑L1 positivity in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab is the first line of treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining immune checkpoint inhibitor and anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is administered when the above-described combination fails to confer sufficient clinical benefit. The present study aimed to explore the association between tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity and HAIC response. A total of 40 patients with HCC who had undergone HAIC with available biopsy samples obtained between January 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. PD-L1 expression in tumor samples was assessed using a combined positivity score. The response rates of HAIC-treated patients with advanced HCC after failure of atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination therapy were recorded. OS (P=0.9717) and PFS (P=0.4194) did not differ between patients with and without PD-L1 positivity. The objective response rate (P=0.7830) and DCR (P=0.7020) also did not differ based on PD-L1 status. In conclusion, the current findings highlight the consistent efficacy of HAIC, regardless of PD-L1 positivity.

The Role of the MiR-181 Family in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth-leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Due to the high mortality rate in HCC patients, discovering and developing novel systemic treatment options for HCC is a vital unmet medical need. Among the numerous molecular alterations in HCCs, microRNAs (miRNAs) have been increasingly recognised to play critical roles in hepatocarcinogenesis. We and others have recently revealed that members of the microRNA-181 (miR-181) family were up-regulated in some, though not all, human cirrhotic and HCC tissues-this up-regulation induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in hepatocytes and tumour cells, promoting HCC progression. MiR-181s play crucial roles in governing the fate and function of various cells, such as endothelial cells, immune cells, and tumour cells. Previous reviews have extensively covered these aspects in detail. This review aims to give some insights into miR-181s, their targets and roles in modulating signal transduction pathways, factors regulating miR-181 expression and function, and their roles in HCC.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and future perspectives

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer. More than half of the HCC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and often require systemic therapy. Dysregulation of the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is involved in the development and progress of HCC, RTKs are therefore the potential targets for systemic therapy of advanced HCC (aHCC). Currently, a total of six small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for aHCC, including first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donafenib, and second-line regorafenib, cabozantinib, and apatinib. These TKIs improved patients survival, which are associated with disease stage, etiology, liver function, tumor burden, baseline levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and treatment history. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of these TKIs in key clinical trials, retrospective and real-world studies and discusses the future perspectives of TKIs for aHCC, with an aim to provide up-to-date evidence for decision-making in the treatment of aHCC.

Case report: Precision guided reactive cancer management: molecular complete response in heavily pretreated metastatic CRC by dual immunotherapy and sorafenib

Background

Metastatic colon adenocarcinoma presents significant challenges in treatment, particularly when resistant to standard therapies. Precision oncology, guided by multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs), offers a promising way for individualized therapeutic approaches. Integration of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and minimal residual disease (MRD) testing strengthens treatment decision-making, yet challenges persist in identifying and overcoming resistance mechanisms. FLT3 amplification can be one of those resistance/escape mechanisms that needs to be targeted.

Case presentation

This case report presents a 58-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic colon adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis, resistant to conventional treatments. Utilizing CGP and MRD testing, our multidisciplinary MTB identified a complex mutational profile, including APC, DAXX, TP53 mutations, and CDK8 and FLT3 amplifications. With a tumor mutational burden of 10 muts/mb and TPS, CPS scores of 0, immunotherapy was considered, employing dual immune checkpoint inhibitors alongside mebendazole and Lenvatinib targeting the WNT and VEGF/angiogenesis pathways. MRD testing revealed early treatment failure. Re-evaluation identified high copied FLT3 amplification (62 copies) as a resistance mechanism, prompting modification to incorporate sorafenib and dual immunotherapy with mebendazole. Subsequent MRD assessments and radiological scans demonstrated a remarkable therapeutic response, with sustained efficacy and absence of detectable residual disease.

Conclusion

This case highlights the successful application of precision oncology principles, facilitated by dynamic MTB-guided treatment strategies. Integration of MRD testing provided early detection of treatment inefficacy, allowing for timely intervention and adaptation of the treatment plan. Additionally, the case highlights the educational value of rare molecular alterations, emphasizing continual learning and refinement of treatment approaches in precision oncology.

Reduced-Dose or Discontinuation of Bevacizumab Might Be Considered after Variceal Bleeding in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab/Bevacizumab: Case Reports

Background and Objectives: Variceal bleeding (VB) is the most concerning condition that is difficult to treat after atezolizumab/bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods: We would like to introduce the cases of two patients who underwent bevacizumab reduction or discontinuation when VB occurred after atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Results: VB occurred in two patients who showed good tumor response after atezolizumab/bevacizumab treatment, and all VBs were successfully treated with endoscopic variceal ligations. In the first patient, VB did not occur as the tumor response decreased after a 50% reduction in bevacizumab. In the second patient, VB occurred again after a 50% bevacizumab reduction, so bevacizumab was discontinued and treatment with atezolizumab alone has been successfully maintained. Conclusions: Accordingly, we would like to suggest that considering bevacizumab dose reduction instead of changing to tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be a good clinical choice in atezolizumab/bevacizumab patients who develop VB.