Cost-Effectiveness of Brexanolone Versus Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression in the United States

Evaluating cognitive behavioral therapy as a solution for postnatal depression in economically disadvantaged regions

PURPOSE

Postnatal depression (PND) impacts numerous women after childbirth, leading to various impairments in their lives. Mental health interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), need further evaluation in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where resources may be scarce. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of CBT in treating PND in women from LMICs, comparing it to standard care.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following the PRISMA Statement 2020 guidelines. Databases such as PubMed, CINAHL Plus, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO were searched until September 2022. A modified Delphi process was employed to identify relevant studies. The primary outcome was mean depression scores, measured by the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale at baseline and post-intervention.

RESULTS

Out of 487 studies identified, five trials were included, totaling 1056 participants (520 in the intervention group and 536 in the comparator group). At baseline, a minor, insignificant positive effect size was found (Cohen's d = 0.1, 95% CI =  - 0.15, 0.35). Post-CBT, the intervention group showed significant improvements in depression scores (Cohen's d =  - 1.9, 95% CI =  - 3.8, 0). When accounting for the influence of one study, (Ngai et al., Psychother Psychosom 84:294-303, 2015), which held substantial weight in the initial analysis, the effect size was adjusted to d = 0.5, highlighting a lesser but still significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

CBT appears to be effective in improving PND symptoms among women in LMICs and may be considered a first-line treatment for at-risk mothers, including those who are displaced. However, the significant impact of one study on the results emphasizes the need for more rigorous research. The study also highlights the challenges and limitations of providing psychotherapies across LMICs, emphasizing the need for culturally adapted and contextually appropriate interventions to ensure successful implementation and sustainability of mental health care for postnatal women in these settings.

Postmarketing safety profile of brexanolone: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

OBJECTIVE

Brexanolone (Zulresso®) that was approved for the USA in March 2019 is indicated for the treatment of postpartum depression (PPD), but information on adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with its use is limited. The main aim of this study was to explore the postmarketing safety profile of brexanolone.

METHODS

In our case/non-case pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), the reporting odds ratio and information component with 95% confidence intervals were estimated as measures of disproportionate reporting. Primary disproportionality analyses were performed by comparing brexanolone with all other drugs or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Sensitivity analyses were performed on a subset of perinatal depression.

RESULTS

We identified 267 cases using brexanolone. Brexanolone was reported as a primary or secondary suspect drug in most cases (n = 260, 97.38%). Of the total brexanolone cases, positive dechallenge and discontinuation accounted for 12.36% (n = 33) and 26.22% (n = 70), respectively. Serious outcomes were reported in 11.61% (n = 31) patients. Compared to all the other drugs or SSRIs within the same time window, the reporting risks of brexanolone were mainly from psychiatric and nervous systems. Sensitivity analyses indicated that these significant disproportionalities were mostly retained.

CONCLUSION

Our pharmacovigilance analysis showed a high reporting frequency of psychiatric and nervous system ADRs associated with the use of brexanolone. In additional prospective research, these signals urgently need to be clarified.

The cost-effectiveness of zuranolone versus selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for the treatment of postpartum depression in the United States

AIMS

The objective of this research is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of zuranolone, the first oral treatment indicated for postpartum depression (PPD) in adults approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.

METHODS

Zuranolone and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) trial-based efficacy was derived from an indirect treatment comparison. Long-term efficacy outcomes were based on a large longitudinal cohort study. Maternal health utility values were derived from trial-based, short-form 6-D responses. Other inputs were derived from literature and economic data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. We estimated costs (2023 US dollars) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for patients with PPD treated with zuranolone (14-day dosing) or SSRIs (chronic dosing). The indirect costs and QALYs of the children and partners were also estimated.

RESULTS

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for zuranolone versus SSRIs was $94,741 per QALY gained over an 11-year time horizon. Maternal total direct medical costs averaged $84,318 in the zuranolone arm, compared to $86,365 in the SSRI arm. Zuranolone-treated adults averaged 6.178 QALYs compared to 6.116 QALYs for the SSRI arm. Costs and utilities for the child and partner were also included in the base case. Drug and administration costs for zuranolone averaged $15,902, compared to $30 for SSRIs over the studied time horizon. Results were sensitive to the model time horizon.

LIMITATIONS

As head-to-head trials were not available to permit direct comparison, efficacy inputs were derived from an indirect treatment comparison which can be confounded by cross-trial differences. The data used are reflective of a general PPD population rather than marginalized individuals who may be at a greater risk for adverse PPD outcomes. The model likely excludes unmeasured effects for patient, child, and partner.

CONCLUSIONS

This economic model's results suggest that zuranolone is a more cost-effective therapy compared to SSRIs for treating adults with PPD.

Preclinical and clinical pharmacology of brexanolone (allopregnanolone) for postpartum depression: a landmark journey from concept to clinic in neurosteroid replacement therapy

This article describes the critical role of neurosteroids in postpartum depression (PPD) and outlines the landmark pharmacological journey of brexanolone as a first-in-class neurosteroid antidepressant with significant advantages over traditional antidepressants. PPD is a neuroendocrine disorder that affects about 20% of mothers after childbirth and is characterized by symptoms including persistent sadness, fatigue, dysphoria, as well as disturbances in cognition, emotion, appetite, and sleep. The main pathology behind PPD is the postpartum reduction of neurosteroids, referred to as neurosteroid withdrawal, a concept pioneered by our preclinical studies. We developed neurosteroid replacement therapy (NRT) as a rational approach for treating PPD and other conditions related to neurosteroid deficiency, unveiling the power of neurosteroids as novel anxiolytic-antidepressants. The neurosteroid, brexanolone (BX), is a progesterone-derived allopregnanolone that rapidly relieves anxiety and mood deficits by activating GABA-A receptors, making it a transformational treatment for PPD. In 2019, the FDA approved BX, an intravenous formulation of allopregnanolone, as an NRT to treat PPD. In clinical studies, BX significantly improved PPD symptoms within hours of administration, with tolerable side effects including headache, dizziness, and somnolence. We identified the molecular mechanism of BX in a neuronal PPD-like milieu. The mechanism of BX involves activation of both synaptic and extrasynaptic GABA-A receptors, which promote tonic inhibition and serve as a key target for PPD and related conditions. Neurosteroids offer several advantages over traditional antidepressants, including rapid onset, unique mechanism, and lack of tolerance upon repeated use. Some limitations of BX therapy include lack of aqueous solubility, limited accessibility, hospitalization for treatment, lack of oral product, and serious adverse events at high doses. However, the unmet need for synthetic neurosteroids to address this critical condition supersedes these limitations. Recently, we developed novel hydrophilic neurosteroids with a superior profile and improved drug delivery. Overall, approval of BX is a major milestone in the field of neurotherapeutics, paving the way for the development of novel synthetic neurosteroids to treat depression, epilepsy, and status epilepticus.

Therapeutic Implications of microRNAs in Depressive Disorders: A Review

MicroRNAs are hidden players in complex psychophysical phenomena such as depression and anxiety related disorders though the activation and deactivation of multiple proteins in signaling cascades. Depression is classified as a mood disorder and described as feelings of sadness, loss, or anger that interfere with a person’s everyday activities. In this review, we have focused on exploration of the significant role of miRNAs in depression by affecting associated target proteins (cellular and synaptic) and their signaling pathways which can be controlled by the attachment of miRNAs at transcriptional and translational levels. Moreover, miRNAs have potential role as biomarkers and may help to cure depression through involvement and interactions with multiple pharmacological and physiological therapies. Taken together, miRNAs might be considered as promising novel therapy targets themselves and may interfere with currently available antidepressant treatments.

Cost-effectiveness of mental health interventions during and after pregnancy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Mental health problems during and after pregnancy such as depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or addiction are common and can have lifelong implications for both parents and offspring. This review investigates the cost-effectiveness of interventions tackling these problems, assesses the methodological quality of included studies, and indicates suggestions for further research.

METHODS

Thirteen databases were searched for economic evaluations of interventions related to antenatal, perinatal, and postnatal mental health conditions, published between 2000 and September 2021, in high-income countries.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies met all inclusion criteria. Interventions considered were screening programs, pharmacological treatments, and various forms of psychosocial and psychological support. Six studies reported that the intervention was cost-saving. Eighteen were cost-effective and seven likely to be cost-effective. Only six studies included health outcomes for the child; one study considered paternal health. The time horizon for which costs and consequences were considered was for most evaluations limited to 1 year (n = 18) or 2 years (n = 11) postpartum.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the importance of the subject, a relatively low number of studies have investigated the cost-effectiveness of interventions tackling mental health problems during and after pregnancy. The scant evidence available suggests good overall value for money. Likely, cost-effectiveness is underestimated as costly long-term consequences on offspring are systematically excluded. No evidence was found for several frequently occurring conditions. Further research is required to obtain reliable, long-term effectiveness data and to address the methodological challenges related to measuring all relevant health outcomes for all parties affected.

Effectiveness of Internet-based psychological interventions for treating perinatal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Perinatal depression can result in short- and long-term adverse effects for women and their children if untreated. Psychological interventions, the preferred treatment for most women with perinatal depression, can also be provided online.

AIMS

This study aimed to provide a comprehensive and systematic review of Internet-based psychological interventions and to evaluate their effectiveness in the treatment of perinatal depression.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted of six databases, including CINAHL, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO. Depression and anxiety, which were the primary and secondary results of this search, were presented as standardised mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). This review was conducted according to the PRISMA checklist.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies involving 2158 perinatal women were included. Content, method, duration and frequency of Internet-based psychological interventions were varied. Participants indicated a high rate of satisfaction with these interventions; participants' dropout rates ranged from 2.6% to 60.8%. Meta-analysis demonstrated that Internet-based psychological interventions improved perinatal depression (SMD = -0.72, CI = [-1.02, -0.42], p < .01) and anxiety symptoms (SMD = -0.52, CI = [-0.73, -0.30], p < .01), with heterogeneity of 86% and 59%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Internet-based psychological interventions are considered as convenient and effective alternative treatment for perinatal depression and anxiety. In the future, additional studies are needed to investigate the long-term effects of these interventions on the mental health of perinatal women and the effects on the growth and development of infants while controlling for the dropout rate.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Internet-based psychological interventions are innovative approaches to improving perinatal depressive symptoms that can leverage mental health resources and improve accessibility while promoting multidisciplinary integration. The approach, content, frequency and duration of intervention should be considered comprehensively to achieve the objectives of the intervention while maintaining compliance of women with perinatal depression.

Comparison of Estimated Incentives for Preventing Postpartum Depression in Value-Based Payment Models Using the Net Present Value of Care vs Total Cost of Care

Importance

Strong financial incentives are critical to promoting widespread implementation of interventions that prevent postpartum depression. Value-based payment (VBP) approaches could be adapted to capture longer-term value and offer stronger incentives for postpartum depression prevention by sharing the expected future health care savings estimated by reduced postpartum depression incidence with clinicians.

Objective

To evaluate whether sharing 5-year expected savings estimated by reduced postpartum depression incidence offers stronger incentives for prevention than traditional VBP under a variety of circumstances.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This decision analytic model used a simulated cohort of 1000 Medicaid-enrolled pregnant individuals. Health care costs for individuals receiving postpartum depression preventive intervention or not, over 1 or 5 years post partum, in a variety of scenarios, including varying rates of Medicaid churn (ie, transitions to a new Medicaid managed care plan, commercial insurance plan, or loss of coverage) were estimated for the period 2020 to 2025. The model was developed between March 5 and July 30, 2021.

Exposure

Sharing 100% of 1-year actual health care cost saving vs 50% of 5-year estimated health care cost savings associated with reduced postpartum depression incidence.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The main outcome was the amount of clinician incentive shared in a VBP model from providing preventive interventions. The likelihood of the health care payer realizing a positive return on investment if it shared 50% of 5-year expected savings with a clinician up front was also measured.

Results

The simulated cohort was designed to be reflective of the demographics characteristics of pregnant individuals receiving Medicaid; however, no specific demographic features were simulated. Providing preventive interventions for postpartum depression resulted in an estimated 5-year savings of $734.12 (95% credible interval [CrI], $217.21-$1235.67) per person. Without health insurance churn, sharing 50% of 5-year expected savings could offer more than double the financial incentives for clinicians to prevent postpartum depression compared with traditional VBP ($367.06 [95% CrI, $108.61-$617.83] vs $177.74 [95% CrI, $52.66-$296.60], respectively), with a high likelihood of positive return for the health care payer (91%). As health insurance churn increased, clinician incentives from sharing estimated savings decreased (73% reduction with 50% annual churn).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this decision analytic model of VBP approaches to incentivizing postpartum depression prevention, VBP based on 5-year expected savings offered stronger incentives when churn was low. Policy should support health care payers and clinicians to share estimated savings and overcome health insurance churn issues to promote wide-scale implementation of interventions to prevent perinatal mental health conditions.

A Novel Treatment of Postpartum Depression and Review of Literature

Early-onset postpartum depression has been shown to have a unique neurobiological basis compared to major depressive disorder, implying a need for targeted treatments such as the recent Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved brexanolone. In this case report, a woman with a past medical history of major depressive disorder was diagnosed with postpartum depression due to worsening mood with suicidal and homicidal ideations. She was treated with vilazodone and aripiprazole with good effect after consideration of her past medication trials. Her regimen is unique in clinical practice and not reported in current literature for the treatment of postpartum depression. It may represent a safe and effective medication choice, especially in the context of current first-line treatments that have a high treatment failure rate. More research is needed to find treatments that address the unique challenges of postpartum women.

Treating Postpartum Depression: What Do We Know about Brexanolone?

Postpartum depression (PPD) is defined as the onset of major depressive disorder in mothers, occurring during pregnancy or within 4 weeks post-delivery. With 7% of pregnancy-related death in the United States owing to mental health conditions, including PPD, and a global prevalence of 12%, PPD is a growing public health concern. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved brexanolone, an exogenous analog of allopregnanolone, as the first ever drug to be specifically indicated for treating patients with PPD. This approval was preceded by an open-label study and three randomized placebo-controlled trials, each assessing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of brexanolone, using mean Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) score reduction as the primary outcome. In each randomized controlled trial, the drug was administered as an intravenous infusion given over 60 h. Enrolled participants were followed up on days 7 and 30 to evaluate the sustained effect. A statistically significant reduction in mean HAM-D score compared to placebo was observed in all three studies, supporting brexanolone's use in treating moderate-to-severe PPD. Therefore, this article attempts to briefly review the pharmacology of brexanolone, evaluate the latest available clinical data and outcomes concerning its use, reevaluate its position as a 'breakthrough' in managing PPD, and review the cost-related barriers to its worldwide standardized use.

Achieving clinical response in postpartum depression leads to improvement in health-related quality of life

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden associated with postpartum depression (PPD), determine the extent to which clinical response impacts HRQoL, and estimate the impact of PPD and clinical response on healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and productivity.

METHODS

Patient data (n = 127) from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of brexanolone injection in adults with PPD were employed for these posthoc analyses. HRQoL and health utility was assessed with the SF-36-v2 Health Survey (SF-36v2) acute version. The 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) total score was used to identify clinical response (≥50% reduction in HAMD-17 total score). Baseline HRQoL burden was assessed by comparison to age- and gender-adjusted population normative data from the 2009 QualityMetric PRO Norming study. The impact of clinical response was evaluated by comparing day 7 and day 30 SF-36v2 scores between clinical responders and non-responders. Interpretations of the meaningfulness of clinical response were indirectly estimated via 2017 National Health and Wellness Survey data linking SF-36v2 mental component summary (MCS) scores to (HRU) and productivity.

RESULTS

Baseline HRQoL of patients with PPD was significantly below normative values. Day 7 and day 30 clinical response were associated with large and statistically significant improvements in HRQoL, greater likelihood of meeting SF-36v2 responder definitions, and reduced impairment. MCS levels corresponding to those observed in clinical responders were linked to lower HRU and productivity loss relative to non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

PPD places a substantial burden on HRQoL. Achievement of rapid clinical response (at day 7) and clinical response sustained several weeks following the end of treatment (day 30) led to significant improvement in HRQoL, suggesting the importance of identifying women with PPD and providing effective treatment options.

Brexanolone in Postpartum Depression: Post Hoc Analyses to Help Inform Clinical Decision-Making

Background: Brexanolone (BRX) injection was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2019 for the treatment of adults with postpartum depression (PPD) based on two Phase 3 clinical trials. Materials and Methods: Data from the three trials were combined. PPD-specific 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD-17) group-level minimal important difference (MID) and patient-level meaningful change (meaningful change threshold [MCT]) were estimated and applied to differences in BRX versus placebo (PBO) at hour 60 (primary endpoint) and day 30 (end of trial follow-up). Likelihood of HAMD-17 response and remission and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) response for BRX versus PBO were assessed at hour 60 and as sustained through day 30 using relative risk. Associated number needed to treat (NNT) and number needed to harm (NNH) values were also estimated. Results: Two-hundred nine patients were included. The average HAMD-17 MID estimate was -2.1; the least-squared mean difference between BRX and PBO exceeded this at hour 60 and day 30. Minimal, moderate, and large MCTs were estimated to be -9, -15, and -20 points, respectively. Significantly more BRX-treated than PBO-treated patients achieved minimal, moderate, and large change (all ps < 0.05) at hour 60 and large meaningful response at day 30 (p < 0.05). BRX-treated patients were more likely to sustain HAMD-17 remission and CGI-I response through day 30 versus PBO. NNTs ranged from 4 to 8, with NNH of 97. Conclusions: BRX provided meaningful changes relative to PBO, rapid (hour 60), and sustained improvements (day 30) in PPD symptoms, low NNT, and large NNH. These results may help inform treatment decision-making. Clinicaltrials.gov registration numbers: NCT02614547, NCT02942004, and NCT02942017.