Health care resource utilization and costs of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection in the elderly: a real-world claims analysis

Characteristics and Real-World Outcomes of Patients Treated with Fecal Microbiota, Live-jslm (RBL) for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) is common, with symptoms ranging from diarrhea to life-threatening sepsis. This study aimed to assess the real-world outcomes of patients with rCDI in the United States (US) who received fecal microbiota, live-jslm (RBL), the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved microbiota-based therapy for the prevention of rCDI after antibiotic treatment.

METHODS

Adults with rCDI who received RBL between July 2023 and August 2024 at home or in a clinic and had ≥ 8 weeks of follow-up or experienced CDI recurrence at any time after RBL administration were included. Treatment success, defined as no CDI recurrence within 8 weeks of RBL, was assessed overall and in subgroups stratified by age, number of prior CDI recurrences, duration of the antibiotic washout period, prior bezlotoxumab use, and RBL administration setting.

RESULTS

Among 196 patients who received RBL, 176 had either ≥ 8 weeks of follow-up or had < 8 weeks of follow-up but experienced CDI recurrence during that period. The treatment success rate at 8 weeks was 83.0%. No significant differences were observed in treatment success rates among subgroups based on age (< 65 years old vs. ≥ 65 years old: 85.9% vs. 80.2%, p = 0.20), duration of the antibiotic washout period (24 h: 80.0%, 48 h: 84.5%, 72 h: 85.0%, p = 0.68), number of prior CDI recurrences (< 3 vs. ≥ 3: 82.5% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.60), or prior bezlotoxumab use (86.4% vs. 83.7%, p = 1.00). Patients receiving RBL at home had a higher treatment success rate compared to those receiving RBL in a clinic (87.3% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

RBL was highly effective in preventing rCDI in a real-world setting, including at-home administration. The effectiveness was also observed among high-risk subgroups, such as patients ≥ 65 years old and those with ≥ 3 prior CDI recurrences.

Impact of an Intervention Program on Clostridioides difficile Infections: Comparison of 2 Hospital Cohorts

Background

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurs in various contexts and care settings and is managed by multiple specialists who are not experts in its management. While there are many initiatives to improve the diagnosis and avoid overdiagnosis, there is less focus on the overall management of the infection.

Methods

We studied a cohort of patients with a positive test result for toxigenic C difficile in 2 hospitals. Hospital A has a program that provides advice from an infectious disease specialist (IDS) and promotes continuity of care by providing a phone number to contact the IDS. Hospital B does not have any specific CDI program. The evaluation assessed the proportion of patients not treated (carriers or self-limited disease), adherence to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, access to novel therapies, recurrence and mortality rates, and readmission and emergency department visits due to CDI. We assessed the program's effectiveness through a logistic regression model adjusted for covariates chosen by clinical criteria.

Results

Hospital A avoided more unnecessary treatments (19.3% vs 11.5%), provided access to novel therapies more frequently (35.3% vs 13%), and adhered more closely to current guidelines (95.8% vs 71.3%). Although the mortality and recurrence rates did not differ, the absence of an intervention program was associated with greater odds of admission due to recurrence (odds ratio, 4.19; P = .037) and more visits to the emergency department due to CDI (odds ratio, 8.74; P = .001).

Conclusions

Implementation of a CDI intervention program based on recommendations from IDSs and improved access to specialized care during the follow-up is associated with enhanced quality of CDI management and potential reductions in hospital resource utilization.

Medical expenses and its determinants in female patients with urological disorder

BACKGROUND

The rising older adult population has led to an increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases and medical expenses. Women tend to have a longer healthy life expectancy than men and are more likely to be exposed to urological disorders around the age of 50, resulting in substantial healthcare expenses throughout their lifetime. Urological disorders often require continuous treatment owing to their high risk of recurrence, contributing to an increased financial burden from medical costs. This study aimed to identify factors influencing medical expense in female patients with urological disorders and propose strategies to alleviate the associated financial burden.

METHODS

We used data from the Korea Health Panel Survey conducted from 2011 to 2016. The final sample comprised 2,932 patients who visited hospitals for urological disorders. To identify the factors influencing medical expense among female patients with urological disorders, we employed a generalized estimating equation model.

RESULTS

The results indicated that younger people and patients with middle-income levels tended to incur higher medical expenses. Furthermore, patients receiving treatment at tertiary hospitals and those enrolled in National Health Insurance also incurred higher health expenses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that effective management of medical expenses related to urological disorders in women requires improvements in healthcare accessibility to facilitate early detection and continuous disease management. In addition, the findings highlight the potential benefits of digital health and non-face-to-face treatments in addressing these needs.

Clostridioides difficile infection, recurrence and the associated healthcare consumption in Sweden between 2006 and 2019: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) causes a major burden to individuals and society, yet the impact may vary depending on age, sex, underlying comorbidities and where CDI was acquired (hospital or community).

METHODS

This Swedish nationwide population-based cohort study (2006-2019) compared all 43,150 individuals with CDI to their 355,172 matched controls (first year and entire follow-up). Negative binomial regression models compared the cumulated length of stay, number of in-hospital admissions, outpatient visits and prescriptions after the first CDI episode expressed as incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals for the entire follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 91.6% of CDI cases were hospital acquired, and 16.8% presented with recurrence(s); 74.8%of cases were ≥ 65 years and 54.2% were women. Compared to individuals without CDI, in-hospital stay rates were 18.01 times higher after CDI (95% CI 17.40-18.63, first-year: 27.4 versus 1.6 days), 9.45 times higher in-hospital admission (95% CI 9.16-9.76, first-year: 2.6 versus 1.3 hospitalisations), 3.94 times higher outpatient visit (95% CI 3.84-4.05, first-year: 4.0 versus 1.9 visits) and 3.39 times higher dispensed prescriptions rates (95% CI 3.31-3.48, first-year: 25.5 versus 13.7 prescriptions). For all outcomes, relative risks were higher among the younger (< 65 years) than the older (≥ 65 years), and in those with fewer comorbidities, but similar between sexes. Compared to those without recurrence, individuals with recurrence particularly showed a higher rate of hospital admissions (IRR = 1.18, 95% 1.12-1.24). Compared to community-acquired CDI, those with hospital-acquired CDI presented with a higher rate of hospital admissions (IRR = 7.29, 95% CI 6.68-7.96) and a longer length of stay (IRR = 7.64, 95% CI 7.07-8.26).

CONCLUSION

CDI was associated with increased health consumption in all affected patient groups. The majority of the CDI burden could be contributed to hospital-acquired CDI (~ 9/10), older patients (~ 3/4) and those with multiple comorbidities (~ 6/10 Charlson score ≥ 3), with 1/5 of the total CDI burden contributed to individuals with recurrence. Yet, relatively speaking the burden was higher among the younger and those with fewer comorbidities, compared to their peers without CDI.

Bile acids impact the microbiota, host, and C. difficile dynamics providing insight into mechanisms of efficacy of FMTs and microbiota-focused therapeutics

Clostridioides difficile is a major nosocomial pathogen, causing significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Antibiotic usage, a major risk factor for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), disrupts the gut microbiota, allowing C. difficile to proliferate and cause infection, and can often lead to recurrent CDI (rCDI). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and live biotherapeutic products (LBPs) have emerged as effective treatments for rCDI and aim to restore colonization resistance provided by a healthy gut microbiota. However, much is still unknown about the mechanisms mediating their success. Bile acids, extensively modified by gut microbes, affect C. difficile's germination, growth, and toxin production while also shaping the gut microbiota and influencing host immune responses. Additionally, microbial interactions, such as nutrient competition and cross-feeding, contribute to colonization resistance against C. difficile and may contribute to the success of microbiota-focused therapeutics. Bile acids as well as other microbial mediated interactions could have implications for other diseases being treated with microbiota-focused therapeutics. This review focuses on the intricate interplay between bile acid modifications, microbial ecology, and host responses with a focus on C. difficile, hoping to shed light on how to move forward with the development of new microbiota mediated therapeutic strategies to combat rCDI and other intestinal diseases.

A profile of the live biotherapeutic product RBX2660 and its role in preventing recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection

INTRODUCTION

Clostridiodes difficile infection (CDI) is a life-threatening illness that has been labelled as an urgent threat by the Centers for Disease prevention (CDC).

AREAS COVERED

RBX2660, a live biotherapeutic product offers a very promising treatment option for patients with recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection(rCDI). RBX2660 restores the healthy gut microbiome and shows clinically meaningful benefits for patients suffering from rCDI. Safety, efficacy, and tolerability of RBX2660 have been thoroughly assessed .

EXPERT OPINION

An FDA-approved, standardized, and accessible microbiota restoration product like RBX2660 would provide a new option for patients in need of treatment for rCDI by breaking the cycle of disease recurrence.

Heterogeneity of Randomized Controlled Trials of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of FMT for reduction in CDI recurrences (rCDI), but this treatment and its reporting in the literature has significant heterogeneity. Recent publications (e.g., Ramai et al. in Dig Dis Sci 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06185-7 ) present the clinical outcomes for different FMT methodologies. However, to understand, compare, and contextualize outcomes, this heterogeneity in methods and reporting must be understood.

METHODS

We performed a literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of FMT for rCDI to evaluate heterogeneity among trials. A methodical search between January 2010 and May 2019 of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane was conducted for studies investigating FMT in adults with rCDI. RCTs were evaluated for a variety of methodological and reporting criteria.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs were identified, wherein 14 different FMT preparations were considered (each with distinct protocols for processing, storage, administration, and dosing). Sample sizes were generally small, with only two studies performing FMT in more than 100 patients. Three studies used non-FMT controls (vancomycin), while the remaining compared FMT with differing routes of administration or formulations. Across the identified studies, there was no standardized manner for reporting the timing of the FMT procedure. All studies tracked adverse events; however, follow-up periods were limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Considerable variability exists among RCTs, with marked differences in study design, control groups, and outcome assessment. Lack of a standard-of-care control in many trials may impact reproducibility of FMT trial outcomes in patients with rCDI. Widespread use of FMT for rCDI is still investigational; therefore, these foundational studies provide opportunities to optimize future trials.

Potential Cost Savings Associated with Targeted Substitution of Current Guideline-Concordant Inpatient Agents with Omadacycline for the Treatment of Adult Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia at High Risk for Clostridioides difficile Infections: Results of Healthcare-Decision Analytic Model from the United States Hospital Perspective

Introduction: Approximately 3% of hospitalized patients with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) develop healthcare-associated Clostridioides difficile infection (HCA-CDI). The validated Davis risk score (DRS) indicates that patients with a DRS ≥ 6 are at an increased risk of 30-day HCA-CDI. In the phase 3 OPTIC CABP study, 14% of CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 who received moxifloxacin developed CDI vs. 0% for omadacycline. This study assessed the potential economic impact of substituting current guideline-concordant CABP inpatient treatments with omadacycline in hospitalized CABP patients with a DRS ≥ 6 across US hospitals. Methods: A deterministic healthcare-decision analytic model was developed. The model population was hospitalized adult CABP patients with a DRS ≥ 6 across US hospitals (100,000 patients). In the guideline-concordant arm, 14% of CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 were assumed to develop an HCA-CDI, each costing USD 20,100. In the omadacycline arm, 5 days of therapy was calculated for the entire model population. Results: The use of omadacycline in place of guideline-concordant CABP inpatient treatments for CABP patients with DRS ≥ 6 was estimated to result in cost savings of USD 55.4 million annually across US hospitals. Conclusion: The findings of this simulated model suggest that prioritizing the use of omadacycline over current CABP treatments in hospitalized CABP with a DRS ≥ 6 may potentially reduce attributable HCA-CDI costs. The findings are not unique to omadacycline and could be applied to any antibiotic that confers a lower risk of HCA-CDI relative to current CABP inpatient treatments.