The different hypoglycemic effects between East Asian and non-Asian type 2 diabetes patients when treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors as an add-on treatment for metformin: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide in Asians and Non-Asians Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

More than half of diabetes patients are Asians, and their tolerance to antidiabetic drugs may differ from that of non-Asians. Oral semaglutide has recently gained attention for its advantages in glycemic and body weight control. However, its effects across different ethnic groups remain unknown.

METHODS

All available databases of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on oral semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. These databases provided detailed patient information, including HbA1c levels, body weight, and adverse events (AEs and serious adverse events [SAEs]).

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials involving 7817 patients were included: six conducted in European and American populations and four in East Asian populations. In both the Asian and non-Asian patients' subgroups, oral semaglutide 3, 7, and 14 mg was more effective in reducing HbA1c than placebo, and between-subgroups analysis showed that semaglutide 3, 7, and 14 mg was more effective in reducing HbA1c in the Asian patients' subgroup than in the non-Asian patients' subgroup. There were no significant differences between subgroups in the number of patients achieving HbA1c < 5%. Non-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes showed significant weight reduction with 7 mg and 14 mg oral semaglutide, and Asian patients reduced body weight only with 14 mg oral semaglutide. Between-subgroups analysis showed that 7 mg oral semaglutide was more effective for weight reduction in non-Asian patients than in Asian patients. In the analysis of the efficacy of oral semaglutide at weeks 26 and 52 in Asian and non-Asian patients, in Asian patients, the hypoglycemic efficacy of oral semaglutide at 3-, 7-, and 14-mg doses at week 52 was significantly lower than that at week 26. In non-Asian patients, there was no significant difference in the reducing HbA1c efficacy of these doses of oral semaglutide at weeks 26 and 52. The weight-reduction efficacy of all doses of oral semaglutide did not change significantly with treatment duration in either Asian or non-Asian patients. Compared with sitagliptin, oral semaglutide was more effective in HbA1c reduction and weight reduction in both Asian and non-Asian patients. Subgroup analysis showed that compared with sitagliptin, Asian patients received oral semaglutide to achieve greater efficacy (HbA1c and weight reduction) than non-Asian patients. In the analysis of adverse events, oral semaglutide, as compared with placebo, was not associated with serious adverse events in either subgroup. The incidence of other (not including series) adverse events was significantly higher in non-Asian patients receiving 7 mg and 14 mg oral semaglutide.

CONCLUSIONS

Oral semaglutide demonstrates superior efficacy in reducing HbA1c levels and a rapid onset of action in Asian patients. However, its efficacy appears to diminish with prolonged treatment in this population. Medium (7 mg)-dose oral semaglutide was associated with greater weight reduction in non-Asian patients than in Asian patients, but this difference was eliminated with higher doses. Additionally, doses of 7 mg or more of oral semaglutide are associated with a higher incidence of side effects in non-Asian patients.

The impact of metformin on kidney disease progression and mortality in diabetic patients using SGLT2 inhibitors: a real-world cohort study

BACKGROUND

Selecting the optimal first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes is essential for achieving glycemic control and providing cardio-renal protection, though the combined benefits of metformin with SGLT2 inhibitors, remain uncertain.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from Clalit Health Services (2016-2021), to compare outcome in adults with type 2 diabetes treated with SGLT2 inhibitors alone versus in combination with metformin. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics between groups. Primary outcomes were a composite kidney outcome (40% decline in eGFR, or progression to ESRD), and all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included hospitalizations, acute kidney injury and metabolic acidosis.

RESULTS

The study included 45,545 patients, with 6774 patients in each group following propensity score matching. The median follow-up time was 1166 days. Combination therapy with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality (aHR 0.74, 95% CI 0.64-0.84), and composite kidney outcomes (aHR 0.65 95% CI 0.48-0.87) even after accounting for mortality as a competing risk (aHR 0.67; 95% CI 0.5-0.9). Furthermore, combination therapy was associated with reduced risks of hospitalization (aHR 0.93 95% CI 0.87-0.99), severe acute kidney injury events (aHR 0.72 95% CI 0.54-0.96) and metabolic acidosis events (aHR 0.58 95% CI 0.4-0.83), compared with SGLT2 inhibitors alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving combination therapy with metformin and SGLT2 inhibitors showed significantly reduced risks of kidney disease progression and mortality compared to those treated with SGLT2 inhibitors alone. These findings support the use of metformin with SGLT2 inhibitors as a first-line treatment strategy for type 2 diabetes irrespective of glycemic control or cardio-renal risk factors.

Long-term comparison of renal and metabolic outcomes after sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist therapy in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes following treatment with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) have not been directly compared. This study compared the impact of SGLT2i and GLP1RA therapy on renal function and metabolic parameters.

METHODS

Patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated SGLT2i or GLP1RA therapy in a tertiary hospital between January 2009 and August 2023 were included to assess composite renal outcomes, such as a 40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), onset of end-stage renal disease, renal death, or new-onset macroalbuminuria. Alterations in blood pressure, glucose regulation parameters, lipid profile, and anthropometric parameters, including body fat and muscle masses, were examined over 4-years.

RESULTS

A total of 2,112 patients were enrolled using a one-to-three propensity-score matching approach (528 patients for GLP1RAs, 1,584 patients for SGLT2i). SGLT2i treatment was favoured over GLP1RA treatment, though not significantly, for composite renal outcomes (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; p = 0.097). SGLT2i therapy preserved renal function effectively than GLP1RAs (decrease in eGFR, ≥ 40%; HR, 0.46; p = 0.023), with improving albuminuria regression (HR, 1.72; p = 0.036). SGLT2i therapy decreased blood pressure and body weight to a greater extent. However, more patients attained HbA1c levels < 7.0% with GLP1RAs than with SGLT2is (40.6% vs 31.4%; p < 0.001). GLP1RA therapy enhanced β-cell function and decreased LDL-cholesterol levels below baseline values.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2is were superior for preserving renal function and reducing body weight, whereas GLP1RAs were better for managing glucose dysregulation and dyslipidaemia.

Ethnic disparities in cardiovascular and renal responses to canagliflozin between Asian and White patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A post hoc analysis of the CANVAS Program

AIM

To assess the potential heterogeneity in cardiovascular (CV), renal and safety outcomes of canagliflozin between Whites and Asians, as well as these outcomes in each subgroup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CANVAS Program enrolled 10 142 patients with type 2 diabetes, comprising 78.34% Whites and 12.66% Asians. CV, renal and safety outcomes were comprehensively analysed using Cox regression models, while intermediate markers were assessed using time-varying mixed-effects models. Racial heterogeneity was evaluated by adding a treatment-race interacion term.

RESULTS

Canagliflozin showed no significant racial disparities in the majority of the CV, renal and safety outcomes. The heterogeneity (p = .04) was observed on all-cause mortality, with reduced risk in Whites (hazard ratio 0.84; 95% confidence interval 0.71-0.99) and a statistically non-significant increased risk in Asians (hazard ratio 1.64; 95% confidence interval 0.94-2.90). There was a significant racial difference in acute kidney injury (p = .04) and a marginally significant racial heterogeneity for the composite of hospitalization for heart failure and CV death (p = .06) and serious renal-related adverse events (p = .07).

CONCLUSION

Canagliflozin reduced CV and renal risks similarly in Whites and Asians; however, there was a significant racial discrepancy in all-cause mortality. This distinction may be attributed to the fact that Asian patients exhibited diminished CV protection effects and more renal adverse events with canagliflozin, potentially resulting from the smaller reductions in weight and uric acid. These findings highlight the importance of investigating the impact of race on treatment response to sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and provide more precise treatment strategies.

Empagliflozin-A Sodium Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitor: Overview ofits Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Toxicology

BACKGROUND

Empagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor that has gained significant attention in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Understanding its chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology is crucial for the safe and effective use of this medication.

OBJECTIVE

This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of empagliflozin, synthesizing the available literature to present a concise summary of its properties and implications for clinical practice.

METHODS

A systematic search of relevant databases was conducted to identify studies and articles related to the chemistry, pharmacology, and toxicology of empagliflozin. Data from preclinical and clinical studies, as well as post-marketing surveillance reports, were reviewed to provide a comprehensive understanding of the topic.

RESULTS

Empagliflozin is a selective SGLT2 inhibitor that works by constraining glucose reabsorption in the kidneys, causing increased urinary glucose elimination. Its unique mechanism of action provides glycemic control, weight reduction, and blood pressure reduction. The drug's chemistry is characterized by its chemical structure, solubility, and stability. Pharmacologically, empagliflozin exhibits favorable pharmacokinetic properties with rapid absorption, extensive protein binding, and renal elimination. Clinical studies have demonstrated its efficacy in improving glycemic control, reducing cardiovascular risks, and preserving renal function. However, adverse effects, for instance, urinary tract infections, genital infections, and diabetic ketoacidosis have been reported. Toxicological studies indicate low potential for organ toxicity, mutagenicity, or carcinogenicity.

CONCLUSION

Empagliflozin is a promising SGLT2 inhibitor that offers an innovative approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Its unique action mechanism and favorable pharmacokinetic profile contribute to its efficacy in improving glycemic control and reducing cardiovascular risks. While the drug's safety profile is generally favorable, clinicians should be aware of potential adverse effects and monitor patients closely. More study is required to determine the longterm safety and explore potential benefits in other patient populations. Overall, empagliflozin represents a valuable addition to the armamentarium of antidiabetic medications, offering significant benefits to patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus. This study covers all aspects of empagliflozin, including its history, chemistry, pharmacology, and various clinical studies, case reports, and case series.

Efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin in Caucasian patients with type 2 diabetes: results from a phase III, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Most data demonstrating the efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin (luseo) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) originate from the Japanese population. This study evaluated luseo versus placebo (PCB) as add-on to metformin in a Caucasian population with inadequately controlled T2DM.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PCB-controlled, parallel-group study. Patients aged 18-75 years with inadequately controlled T2DM (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7% to ≤10% (≥53 to ≤86 mmol/mol)) despite a diet and exercise program and on a stable metformin regimen were eligible. Patients were randomized to one of three luseo groups (2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mg) or PCB for 12 weeks (W12). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c expressed as least-square means from baseline (W0) to W12.

RESULTS

A total of 328 patients were randomized: PCB (n=83) and luseo 2.5 mg (n=80), 5.0 mg (n=86), and 10.0 mg (n=79). Mean age (±SD) was 58.5±8.8 years; 64.6% were women; body mass index was 31.5±3.4 kg/m2; and HbA1c was 8.54±0.70. At W12, mean reductions in HbA1c from W0 were -0.98%, -1.09%, -1.18%, and -0.73% in the luseo 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 mg, and PCB groups, respectively, all of which were statistically significant. Compared with PCB, HbA1c levels were significantly decreased by 0.25% (p=0.045), 0.36% (p=0.006), and 0.45% (p=0.001) in the luseo 2.5, 5.0, and 10.0 mg groups, respectively. In all luseo dose groups, reductions in body weight were statistically significant compared with PCB. Data from the safety analysis were consistent with the known luseo safety profile.

CONCLUSIONS

All doses of luseo as add-on to metformin in Caucasian patients with uncontrolled T2DM demonstrated significant efficacy in decreasing HbA1c after W12 of treatment.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN39549850.

Annual trends in glycemic control and prescribing patterns in diabetic treatment according to age in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes between 2012 and 2019 (JDDM 71)

AIMS

This study aimed to evaluate changes in glycemic control and diabetes treatment by age group in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

The study included the results of approximately 40,000 patients/year using cross-sectional and retrospective analyses from 2012 to 2019.

RESULTS

There was little change in the glycemic control status in all age groups during the study period. However, by age group, patients aged ≤ 44 years continued to have the highest glycated hemoglobinA1c (HbA1c) values during the study period (7.4 % ± 1.7 % in 2012 and 7.4 % ± 1.5 % in 2019), especially in insulin-treated patients (8.3 % ± 1.9 % in 2012 and 8.4 % ± 1.8 % in 2019). Biguanides and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors were widely prescribed. Sulfonylurea and insulin use showed a decreasing trend, but older patients had a higher percentage of prescriptions. Sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors were prescribed rapidly, especially in younger patients.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no obvious changes in glycemic control over time in the study period. The mean HbA1c level was higher in younger patients, which suggested that improvement is required. In older patients, there was a trend toward greater emphasis on management to avoid hypoglycemia. Different treatment strategies based on age showed different drug choices.

Modeling Chronic Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Literature Review of Models, Data Sources, and Derivation Cohorts

INTRODUCTION

As novel therapies for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) become available, their long-term benefits should be evaluated using CKD progression models. Existing models offer different modeling approaches that could be reused, but it may be challenging for modelers to assess commonalities and differences between the many available models. Additionally, the data and underlying population characteristics informing model parameters may not always be evident. Therefore, this study reviewed and summarized existing modeling approaches and data sources for CKD in T2DM, as a reference for future model development.

METHODS

This systematic literature review included computer simulation models of CKD in T2DM populations. Searches were implemented in PubMed (including MEDLINE), Embase, and the Cochrane Library, up to October 2021. Models were classified as cohort state-transition models (cSTM) or individual patient simulation (IPS) models. Information was extracted on modeled kidney disease states, risk equations for CKD, data sources, and baseline characteristics of derivation cohorts in primary data sources.

RESULTS

The review identified 49 models (21 IPS, 28 cSTM). A five-state structure was standard among state-transition models, comprising one kidney disease-free state, three kidney disease states [frequently including albuminuria and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)], and one death state. Five models captured CKD regression and three included cardiovascular disease (CVD). Risk equations most commonly predicted albuminuria and ESKD incidence, while the most predicted CKD sequelae were mortality and CVD. Most data sources were well-established registries, cohort studies, and clinical trials often initiated decades ago in predominantly White populations in high-income countries. Some recent models were developed from country-specific data, particularly for Asian countries, or from clinical outcomes trials.

CONCLUSION

Modeling CKD in T2DM is an active research area, with a trend towards IPS models developed from non-Western data and single data sources, primarily recent outcomes trials of novel renoprotective treatments.

Efficacy and safety of imeglimin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Imeglimin is a novel tetrahydrotriazine-containing drug suggested as a safe drug for glycemic management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to 1) evaluate the efficacy of imeglimin on glycemic control and insulin resistance improvement measured by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). 2) assess whether the novel drug improves lipid parameters in diabetic patients. 3) compare between different doses regarding safety.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Wiley through April 25, 2021, for relevant randomized controlled trials comparing different doses of imeglimin supplied as a monotherapy or as add-on therapy versus placebo for adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Data on glycemic and lipid parameters and adverse events were extracted and pooled in random-effect models using Review Manager version 5.3.

RESULTS

Eight studies comprising 1555 patients with T2DM were included in this study. The overall effect estimate of the meta-analysis showed that the imeglimin group was superior to the control group concerning glycated hemoglobin and fasting plasma glucose (P < 0.00001). However, it did not affect HOMA-IR or lipid parameters, including triglyceride, LDL-C, and HDL-C (all p > 0.05). Regarding safety profile, imeglimin was safe and tolerable with no treatment-emergent or serious adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Imeglimin safely improved glycemic control by reducing HbA1c and FPG. However, no beneficial effects regarding insulin resistance measured by HOMA-IR or lipid parameters were observed. Further high-quality RCTs with high dose imeglimin are encouraged to ensure HOMA-IR and lipid parameters results.