Blood-brain barrier permeability of gefitinib in patients with brain metastases from non-small-cell lung cancer before and during whole brain radiation therapy

Pharmacological and therapeutic innovation to mitigate radiation-induced cognitive decline (RICD) in brain tumor patients

Radiation therapy is a key treatment modality in both primary and metastatic brain tumors. However, despite its efficacy, it often results in cognitive decline, particularly after whole brain RT (WBRT). Radiation-induced cognitive impairment, which affects memory, attention, and executive function, significantly affects Quality Of Life (QOL) and functional independence. Although white matter necrosis, a hallmark of conventional radiation techniques, has become less common with modern methods, cognitive deficits remain a persistent issue. Neuroinflammation is a key driver of this decline, along with disruptions in hippocampal neurogenesis and damage to regions of the brain. Radiation affects neural stem cells, mature neurons, and glial cells, particularly within the hippocampus, affecting cognition. Recent studies suggest that targeting neuroinflammation and other key Signaling pathways (NMDAR, RAAS, PARP, PPAR, etc.) can reduce cognitive impairment. This review examines the theme of radiation-induced cognitive decline and explores possible interventions to prevent or mitigate these outcomes.

Application of EGFR-TKIs in brain tumors, a breakthrough in future?

Brain tumors, both primary and secondary, represent a significant clinical challenge due to their high mortality and limited treatment options. Primary brain tumors, such as gliomas and meningiomas, and brain metastases from cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer require innovative therapeutic strategies. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR -TKIs) have emerged as a promising treatment option, particularly for tumors harboring EGFR mutations. This review examines the use of EGFR-TKIs in brain tumors, highlighting both laboratory and clinical research findings. In primary brain tumors and brain metastases, EGFR-TKIs have shown potential in controlling tumor growth and improving patient outcomes. Advanced applications, such as nano-formulated EGFR-TKIs and combination therapies with other pathway inhibitors, are being investigated to improve efficacy and overcome resistance. Challenges such as treatment-related events, resistance mechanisms and blood-brain barrier penetration remain significant hurdles. Addressing tumor heterogeneity through personalized medicine approaches is critical to optimizing EGFR-TKI therapies. This review highlights the need for continued research to refine these therapies and improve survival for patients with brain tumors.

Phenotypic heterogeneity and tumor immune microenvironment directed therapeutic strategies in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive tumor with high metastatic potential which leads to decreased survival rate and resistance to chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Nearly 90% of pancreatic cancer comprises pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). About 80% of diagnoses takes place at the advanced metastatic stage when it is unresectable, which renders chemotherapy regimens ineffective. There is also a dearth of specific biomarkers for early-stage detection. Advances in next generation sequencing and single cell profiling have identified molecular alterations and signatures that play a role in PDAC progression and subtype plasticity. Most chemotherapy regimens have shown only modest survival benefits, and therefore, translational approaches for immunotherapies and combination therapies are urgently required. In this review, we have examined the immunosuppressive and dense stromal network of tumor immune microenvironment with various metabolic and transcriptional changes that underlie the pro-tumorigenic properties in PDAC in terms of phenotypic heterogeneity, plasticity and subtype co-existence. Moreover, the stromal heterogeneity as well as genetic and epigenetic changes that impact PDAC development is discussed. We also review the PDAC interaction with sequestered cellular and humoral components present in the tumor immune microenvironment that modify the outcome of chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Finally, we discuss different therapeutic interventions targeting the tumor immune microenvironment aimed at better prognosis and improved survival in PDAC.

Pemigatinib combined with immunotherapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for FGFR2 fusion-positive advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with brain metastasis: a Case Report

BACKGROUND

FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements occur in 13%-20% of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Pemigatinib, a representative FGFR inhibitor, is commonly used for targeted therapy in such patients. Additionally, brain metastasis (BM) is extremely rare in advanced iCCA, and there is currently no standard treatment strategy for advanced iCCA patients with BM. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) may exhibit synergistic antitumor effects, presenting a promising approach for advanced iCCA.

CASE PRESENTATION

The patient, a 58-year-old male, experienced a recurrence of iCCA following surgery and chemotherapy, with multiple metastases in the liver, lungs, and brain. Genetic testing revealed FGFR2-TXLNG-fusion, and the patient was treated with pemigatinib in combination with tislelizumab and SBRT for the BM, resulting in significant tumor shrinkage. Adverse events (AEs) such as liver dysfunction, nail loss, and dry mouth were observed during treatment, which were considered to be related to pemigatinib. These AEs were significantly alleviated after dose reduction and symptomatic treatment.

CONCLUSION

This case presented a rare occurrence of FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA with BM, with extremely limited data on treatment options and survival outcomes in such patients. Our study was the first to report the application of the treatment strategy combining pemigatinib with ICI and SBRT in this specific case. The combined therapy proved effective and well-tolerated, providing new insights for future treatment considerations.

Tumor-derived extracellular vesicles disrupt the blood-brain barrier endothelium following high-frequency irreversible electroporation

High-frequency irreversible electroporation (H-FIRE), a nonthermal brain tumor ablation therapeutic, generates a central tumor ablation zone while transiently disrupting the peritumoral blood-brain barrier (BBB). We hypothesized that bystander effects of H-FIRE tumor cell ablation, mediated by small tumor-derived extracellular vesicles (sTDEV), disrupt the BBB endothelium. Monolayers of bEnd.3 cerebral endothelial cells were exposed to supernatants of H-FIRE or radiation (RT)-treated LL/2 and F98 cancer cells. Endothelial cell response was evaluated microscopically and via flow cytometry for apoptosis. sTDEV were isolated following H-FIRE and RT, characterized via nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) and transmission electron microscopy, and applied to a Transwell BBB endothelium model to quantify permeability changes. Supernatants of H-FIRE-treated tumor cells, but not supernatants of sham- or RT-treated cells, disrupted endothelial cell monolayer integrity while maintaining viability. sTDEV released by glioma cells treated with 3000 V/cm H-FIRE increased permeability of the BBB endothelium model compared to sTDEV released after lower H-FIRE doses and RT. NTA revealed significantly decreased sTDEV release after the 3000 V/cm H-FIRE dose. Our results demonstrate that sTDEV increase permeability of the BBB endothelium after H-FIRE ablation in vitro. sTDEV-mediated mechanisms of BBB disruption may be exploited for drug delivery to infiltrative margins following H-FIRE ablation.

Combined use of radiotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the management of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A literature review

The approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line agents has revolutionised treatment of patients diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring targetable mutations, adding substantial overall survival (OS) benefit, compared to chemotherapy. However, the efficacy of these agents is inevitably diminished at a point in the disease course, either because of cellular resistance-mechanisms or due to affected pharmacokinetics, like low-central nervous system penetration. The aim of this article is to review existing evidence on the combined use of EGFR (epidermal growth factor)- or ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase)-specific TKIs and radiotherapy (RT) in advanced NSCLC setting, as an attempt to delay or overcome TKI-resistance and thus, to expand the time period during which patients derive benefit from a given line of targeted therapy. At present, combining RT with EGFR- or ALK-TKIs in the management of advanced, oncodriver-mutated NSCLC has shown quite promising results, with regards to PFS and OS, rendering prolongation of the TKI-derived benefit feasible, with generally tolerable toxicity. Future studies to confirm the observed efficacy and clarify possible safety issues as well as the appropriate treatment sequence and target volumes are needed, especially in the rapidly-evolving era of newer-generation TKIs.

Preclinical evaluation of targeted therapies for central nervous system metastases

The central nervous system (CNS) represents a site of sanctuary for many metastatic tumors when systemic therapies that control the primary tumor cannot effectively penetrate intracranial lesions. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) are the most likely of all neoplasms to metastasize to the brain, with up to 60% of patients developing CNS metastases during the disease process. Targeted therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have helped reduce lung cancer mortality but vary considerably in their capacity to control CNS metastases. The ability of these therapies to effectively target lesions in the CNS depends on several of their pharmacokinetic properties, including blood-brain barrier permeability, affinity for efflux transporters, and binding affinity for both plasma and brain tissue. Despite the existence of numerous preclinical models with which to characterize these properties, many targeted therapies have not been rigorously tested for CNS penetration during the discovery process, whereas some made it through preclinical testing despite poor brain penetration kinetics. Several TKIs have now been engineered with the characteristics of CNS-penetrant drugs, with clinical trials proving these efforts fruitful. This Review outlines the extent and variability of preclinical evidence for the efficacy of NSCLC-targeted therapies, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or are in development, for treating CNS metastases, and how these data correlate with clinical outcomes.

Optimal sequence of LT for symptomatic BM in EGFR-mutant NSCLC: a comparative study of first-line EGFR-TKIs with/without upfront LT

BACKGROUND

The third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) can penetrate blood-brain barrier and are effective for brain metastases (BMs). There is no consensus on the optimal sequence of local therapy (LT) and EGFR-TKIs for symptomatic BM patients because patients suffering neurological symptoms were not enrolled in most clinical trials.

METHODS

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutation (EGFRm) and symptomatic BM receiving first-line osimertinib and aumolertinib from two medical centers were collected. All participants were allocated into the third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs) group and the upfront LT (uLT) plus third-generation EGFR-TKIs (TKIs + uLT) group. Demographic data, survival outcomes, treatment failure patterns, and adverse events were evaluated between the two groups. We also conducted subgroup analyses to explore the impact of BM number on survival outcomes.

RESULTS

86 patients were enrolled, 44 in the TKIs group and 42 in the TKIs + uLT group. There were no significant differences in the short-term response between the groups. TKIs + uLT was associated with significantly longer overall survival (OS) (43 vs. 28 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.77; p = .011). No differences in progression-free survival (PFS), intracranial PFS (iPFS), failure patterns, or safety were observed. In subgroup analyses of oligo-BM patients, TKIs + uLT could prolong OS (43 vs. 31 months; HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.92; p = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

EGFRm NSCLC patients with symptomatic BM might benefit from uLT, particularly oligo-BM patients. However, larger prospective cohort studies should be carried out to confirm the responses of the TKIs + uLT scheme.

The efficacy of upfront craniocerebral radiotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-positive non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

The present study aims to investigate the therapeutic value of third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) combined with cranial radiotherapy (RT) in patients with EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases (BMs).

Methodology

This is a retrospective study that involved 213 patients with EGFR-NSCLC and BMs, with the patients divided into two groups: the upfront cranial RT (ucRT) group (n = 96) and the non-ucRT group (n = 117). All patients were administered with osimertinib, and those in the ucRT group also underwent RT. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and intracranial PFS (IPFS) of the two groups were compared.

Results

The ucRT group manifested a markedly higher IPFS than the non-ucRT group (29.65 months vs 21.8 months; P < 0.0001). The subgroup analysis revealed that patients with oligometastases (OLOGO-BMs; 1-3 BMs) demonstrated a notably longer OS (44.5 months vs 37.3 months; P < 0.0001), PFS (32.3 months vs 20.8 months; P = 0.6884) and IPFS (37.8 months vs 22.1 months; P < 0.0001) in the ucRT group than in the non-ucRT group. However, for patients with multiple BMs, there was no significant difference in OS (27.3 months vs 34.4 months; P = 0.0710) and PFS (13.7 months vs 13.2 months; P = 0.0516) between the ucRT group and the non-ucRT group; the ucRT group exhibited a higher IPFS (26.4 months vs 21.35 months; P = 0.0028). Cox's multivariate analysis of patients with OLOGO-BM indicated that the use of ucRT was linked to a better OS (heart rate [HR] = 0.392; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.178-0.863; P = 0.020) and PFS (HR = 0.558; 95% CI: 0.316-0.986; P = 0.044).

Conclusion

Upfront cerebral cranial stereotactic radiosurgery can improve outcomes in EGFR-positive patients with NSCLC and OLOGO-BM. However, for patients with multiple BMs, the preferable strategy may be pre-treatment with EGFR-TKIs.

Breaking Barriers in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Literature Review on Invasive and Non-Invasive Techniques for Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) poses a significant challenge to drug delivery for brain tumors, with most chemotherapeutics having limited permeability into non-malignant brain tissue and only restricted access to primary and metastatic brain cancers. Consequently, due to the drug's inability to effectively penetrate the BBB, outcomes following brain chemotherapy continue to be suboptimal. Several methods to open the BBB and obtain higher drug concentrations in tumors have been proposed, with the selection of the optimal method depending on the size of the targeted tumor volume, the chosen therapeutic agent, and individual patient characteristics. Herein, we aim to comprehensively describe osmotic disruption with intra-arterial drug administration, intrathecal/intraventricular administration, laser interstitial thermal therapy, convection-enhanced delivery, and ultrasound methods, including high-intensity focused and low-intensity ultrasound as well as tumor-treating fields. We explain the scientific concept behind each method, preclinical/clinical research, advantages and disadvantages, indications, and potential avenues for improvement. Given that each method has its limitations, it is unlikely that the future of BBB disruption will rely on a single method but rather on a synergistic effect of a combined approach. Disruption of the BBB with osmotic infusion or high-intensity focused ultrasound, followed by the intra-arterial delivery of drugs, is a promising approach. Real-time monitoring of drug delivery will be necessary for optimal results.

Radiotherapy in Preclinical Models of Brain Metastases: A Review and Recommendations for Future Studies

Brain metastases (BMs) frequently occur in primary tumors such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma, and are associated with notably short natural survival. In addition to surgical interventions, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial treatment for BM and encompasses whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Validating the efficacy and safety of treatment regimens through preclinical models is imperative for successful translation to clinical application. This not only advances fundamental research but also forms the theoretical foundation for clinical study. This review, grounded in animal models of brain metastases (AM-BM), explores the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and emerging technologies such as nanomaterials and oxygen-containing microbubbles. Initially, we provided a concise overview of the establishment of AM-BMs. Subsequently, we summarize key RT parameters (RT mode, dose, fraction, dose rate) and their corresponding effects in AM-BMs. Finally, we present a comprehensive analysis of the current research status and future directions for combination therapy based on RT. In summary, there is presently no standardized regimen for AM-BM treatment involving RT. Further research is essential to deepen our understanding of the relationships between various parameters and their respective effects.

Central Nervous System Outcomes of Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib in EGFR-Mutated Advanced NSCLC: A LASER301 Subset Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib, a third-generation mutant-selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, improved progression-free survival compared with gefitinib in the phase 3 LASER301 study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04248829). Here, we report the efficacy of lazertinib and gefitinib in patients with baseline central nervous system (CNS) metastases.

METHODS

Treatment-naive patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC were randomized one-to-one to lazertinib (240 mg/d) or gefitinib (250 mg/d). Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included if any planned radiation, surgery, or steroids were completed more than 2 weeks before randomization. For patients with CNS metastases confirmed at screening or subsequently suspected, CNS imaging was performed every 6 weeks for 18 months, then every 12 weeks. End points assessed by blinded independent central review and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 included intracranial progression-free survival, intracranial objective response rate, and intracranial duration of response.

RESULTS

Of the 393 patients enrolled in LASER301, 86 (lazertinib, n = 45; gefitinib, n = 41) had measurable and or non-measurable baseline CNS metastases. The median intracranial progression-free survival in the lazertinib group was 28.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.8-28.2) versus 8.4 months (95% CI: 6.7-not reached [NR]) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.20-0.89, p = 0.02). Among patients with measurable CNS lesions, the intracranial objective response rate was numerically higher with lazertinib (94%; n = 17) versus gefitinib (73%; n = 11, p = 0.124). The median intracranial duration of response with lazertinib was NR (8.3-NR) versus 6.3 months (2.8-NR) with gefitinib. Tolerability was similar to the overall LASER301 population.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CNS metastases, lazertinib significantly improved intracranial progression-free survival compared with gefitinib, with more durable responses.

New Generations of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Treating NSCLC with Oncogene Addiction: Strengths and Limitations

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring most driver gene alterations. Starting from the first generation, research rapidly moved to the development of newer, more selective generations of TKIs, obtaining improved results in terms of disease control and survival. However, the use of novel generations of TKIs is not without limitations. We reviewed the main results obtained, as well as the ongoing clinical trials with TKIs in oncogene-addicted NSCLC, together with the biology underlying their potential strengths and limitations. Across driver gene alterations, novel generations of TKIs allowed delayed resistance, prolonged survival, and improved brain penetration compared to previous generations, although with different toxicity profiles, that generally moved their use from further lines to the front-line treatment. However, the anticipated positioning of novel generation TKIs leads to abolishing the possibility of TKI treatment sequencing and any role of previous generations. In addition, under the selective pressure of such more potent drugs, resistant clones emerge harboring more complex and hard-to-target resistance mechanisms. Deeper knowledge of tumor biology and drug properties will help identify new strategies, including combinatorial treatments, to continue improving results in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Understanding the activity of antibody-drug conjugates in primary and secondary brain tumours

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), a class of targeted cancer therapeutics combining monoclonal antibodies with a cytotoxic payload via a chemical linker, have already been approved for the treatment of several cancer types, with extensive clinical development of novel constructs ongoing. Primary and secondary brain tumours are associated with high mortality and morbidity, necessitating novel treatment approaches. Pharmacotherapy of brain tumours can be limited by restricted drug delivery across the blood-brain or blood-tumour barrier, although data from phase II studies of the HER2-targeted ADC trastuzumab deruxtecan indicate clinically relevant intracranial activity in patients with brain metastases from HER2⁺ breast cancer. However, depatuxizumab mafodotin, an ADC targeting wild-type EGFR and EGFR variant III, did not provide a definitive overall survival benefit in patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent EGFR-amplified glioblastoma in phase II and III trials, despite objective radiological responses in some patients. In this Review, we summarize the available data on the central nervous system activity of ADCs from trials involving patients with primary and secondary brain tumours and discuss their clinical implications. Furthermore, we explore pharmacological determinants of intracranial activity and discuss the optimal design of clinical trials to facilitate development of ADCs for the treatment of gliomas and brain metastases.

First- versus Third-Generation EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases

Introduction: Up to 50% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor EGFR alterations, the most common etiology behind brain metastases (BMs). First-generation EGFR-directed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) are limited by blood-brain barrier penetration and T790M tumor mutations, wherein third-generation EGFR-TKIs, like Osimertinib, have shown greater activity. However, their efficacy has not been well-studied in later therapy lines in NSCLC patients with BMs (NSCLC-BM). We sought to compare outcomes of NSCLC-BM treated with either first- or third-generation EGFR-TKIs in first-line and 2nd-to-5th-line settings. Methods: A retrospective review of NSCLC-BM patients diagnosed during 2010-2019 at Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, US, a quaternary-care center, was performed and reported following 'strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology' (STROBE) guidelines. Data regarding socio-demographic, histopathological, molecular characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. Primary outcomes were median overall survival (mOS) and progression-free survival (mPFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score matching were utilized to adjust for confounders. Results: 239 NSCLC-BM patients with EGFR alterations were identified, of which 107 received EGFR-TKIs after diagnosis of BMs. 77.6% (83/107) received it as first-line treatment, and 30.8% (33/107) received it in later (2nd-5th) lines of therapy, with nine patients receiving it in both settings. 64 of 107 patients received first-generation (erlotinib/gefitinib) TKIs, with 53 receiving them in the first line setting and 13 receiving it in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. 50 patients received Osimertinib as third-generation EGFR-TKI, 30 in first-line, and 20 in the 2nd-5th lines of therapy. Univariable analysis in first-line therapy demonstrated mOS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs as 18.2 and 19.4 months, respectively (p = 0.57), while unadjusted mPFS of first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs was 9.3 and 13.8 months, respectively (p = 0.14). In 2nd-5th line therapy, for first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs, mOS was 17.3 and 11.9 months, (p = 0.19), while mPFS was 10.4 and 6.08 months, respectively (p = 0.41). After adjusting for age, performance status, presence of extracranial metastases, whole-brain radiotherapy, and presence of leptomeningeal metastases, hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 1.25 (95% CI 0.63-2.49, p = 0.52) for first-line therapy. Adjusted HR for mOS in 2nd-to-5th line therapy was 1.60 (95% CI 0.55-4.69, p = 0.39). Conclusions: No difference in survival was detected between first- and third-generation EGFR-TKIs in either first or 2nd-to-5th lines of therapy. Larger prospective studies are warranted reporting intracranial lesion size, EGFR alteration and expression levels in primary tumor and brain metastases, and response rates.

Experimental study of EGFR-TKI aumolertinib combined with ionizing radiation in EGFR mutated NSCLC brain metastases tumor

Aumolertinib is an irreversible third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), although it has been administered for the treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, it is unclear whether aumolertinib combined with ionizing radiation (IR) has potential therapeutic effects in treating brain metastases (BM) tumors from NSCLC. This study explored the anti-tumor effects of aumolertinib combined with IR in epidermal growth factor receptor mutated (EGFRm) NSCLC BM tumors. First, we established a xenograft model of NSCLC BM tumors in BALB/c nude mice and assessed the anti-tumor effects of this combination. Furthermore, we examined the concentrations of aumolertinib in brain tissue and blood using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS); after that, we used CCK-8, colony formation, flow cytometry assay, and immunofluorescence staining to detect the effects of aumolertinib combined with IR upon PC-9 and NCI-H1975 cells, such as cell proliferation, survival, apoptosis, cycle distribution, the situation of DNA damage, and the expression levels of relevant proteins which were detected via western blotting; finally, we chose a clinical case with which to explore the clinical benefits to the EGFRm NSCLC BM patient after the treatment of the aforementioned combination. The experiments of NSCLC BM tumor animal models demonstrated that the combination enhanced the therapeutic effects and increased the intracranial accumulation of aumolertinib; the combination can inhibit cell proliferation and survival, delay the repair of DNA damage, and increase the rates of cell apoptosis and aumolertinib abrogated G2/M phase arrest, which the IR induced; the clinical study verified that the combination demonstrated better patient benefits. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that combining aumolertinib and IR has promising anti-tumor effects in EGFR-mutant NSCLC and that this combined treatment modality may be employed as a potential therapeutic strategy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC BM patients clinically.

Therapeutic Monitoring of Orally Administered, Small-Molecule Anticancer Medications with Tumor-Specific Cellular Protein Targets in Peripheral Fluid Spaces-A Review

Orally administered, small-molecule anticancer drugs with tumor-specific cellular protein targets (OACD) have revolutionized oncological pharmacotherapy. Nevertheless, the differences in exposure to these drugs in the systemic circulation and extravascular fluid compartments have led to several cases of therapeutic failure, in addition to posing unknown risks of toxicity. The therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of OACDs in therapeutically relevant peripheral fluid compartments is therefore essential. In this work, the available knowledge regarding exposure to OACD concentrations in these fluid spaces is summarized. A review of the literature was conducted by searching Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science for clinical research articles and case reports published between 10 May 2001 and 31 August 2022. Results show that, to date, penetration into cerebrospinal fluid has been studied especially intensively, in addition to breast milk, leukocytes, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, peritoneal fluid, pleural fluid, saliva and semen. The typical clinical indications of peripheral fluid TDM of OACDs were (1) primary malignancy, (2) secondary malignancy, (3) mental disorder, and (4) the assessment of toxicity. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was most commonly applied for analysis. The TDM of OACDs in therapeutically relevant peripheral fluid spaces is often indispensable for efficient and safe treatments.

Prognosticators of osimertinib treatment outcomes in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer and leptomeningeal metastasis

PURPOSE

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is a serious complication of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly in patients with EGFR mutations. In this study, we investigated the survival outcomes of patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who have developed LM and explored the factors associated with their survival.

METHODS

From April 2018 to November 2021, patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who underwent cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sampling under the clinical suspicion of LM were enrolled. The patients' clinicodemographic characteristics, treatment history including whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), overall survival (OS), and intracranial progression-free survival (icPFS) were measured. EGFR mutations in cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) of CSF, including T790M mutation, were analyzed.

RESULTS

We enrolled 62 patients with NSCLC. The median time form diagnosis to LM was 23.1 months and 16 (25.8%) patients had history of prior third-generation EGFR-TKI use. EGFR mutation in CSF ctDNA was detected in 53 patients (85.5%); of them, 10 (16.1%) had T790M mutation. The patients' icPFS and OS after osimertinib were 6.43 and 9.37 months, respectively, and were comparable among patients with different sensitive EGFR mutations, indicating that EGFR mutation status did not affect osimertinib efficacy. Patients who received WBRT after LM had numerically higher icPFS and OS compared to those without. Multivariate analysis revealed that lack of prior exposure to third-generation EGFR-TKI was associated with better OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Osimertinib is effective in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC who developed LM and prior third-generation EGFR-TKI use was associated with poor survival in these patients. The role of WBRT warrants further investigation.

WSD-0922, a novel brain-penetrant inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor, promotes survival in glioblastoma mouse models

Background

Although the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a frequent oncogenic driver in glioblastoma (GBM), efforts to therapeutically target this protein have been largely unsuccessful. The present preclinical study evaluated the novel EGFR inhibitor WSD-0922.

Methods

We employed flank and orthotopic patient-derived xenograft models to characterize WSD-0922 and compare its efficacy to erlotinib, a potent EGFR inhibitor that failed to provide benefit for GBM patients. We performed long-term survival studies and collected short-term tumor, plasma, and whole-brain samples from mice treated with each drug. We utilized mass spectrometry to measure drug concentrations and spatial distribution and to assess the impact of each drug on receptor activity and cellular signaling networks.

Results

WSD-0922 inhibited EGFR signaling as effectively as erlotinib in in vitro and in vivo models. While WSD-0922 was more CNS penetrant than erlotinib in terms of total concentration, comparable concentrations of both drugs were measured at the tumor site in orthotopic models, and the concentration of free WSD-0922 in the brain was significantly less than the concentration of free erlotinib. WSD-0922 treatment provided a clear survival advantage compared to erlotinib in the GBM39 model, with marked suppression of tumor growth and most mice surviving until the end of the study. WSD-0922 treatment preferentially inhibited phosphorylation of several proteins, including those associated with EGFR inhibitor resistance and cell metabolism.

Conclusions

WSD-0922 is a highly potent inhibitor of EGFR in GBM, and warrants further evaluation in clinical studies.

Implicative role of epidermal growth factor receptor and its associated signaling partners in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a pivotal role in early brain development, although its expression pattern declines in accordance with the maturation of the active nervous system. However, recurrence of EGFR expression in brain cells takes place during neural functioning decline and brain atrophy in order to maintain the homeostatic neuronal pool. As a consequence, neurotoxic lesions such as amyloid beta fragment (Aβ_1-42) formed during the alternative splicing of amyloid precursor protein in Alzheimer's disease (AD) elevate the expression of EGFR. This inappropriate peptide deposition on EGFR results in the sustained phosphorylation of the downstream signaling axis, leading to extensive Aβ_1-42 production and tau phosphorylation as subsequent pathogenesis. Recent reports convey that the pathophysiology of AD is correlated with EGFR and its associated membrane receptor complex molecules. One such family of molecules is the annexin superfamily, which has synergistic relationships with EGFR and is known for membrane-bound signaling that contributes to a variety of inflammatory responses. Besides, Galectin-3, tissue-type activated plasminogen activator, and many more, which lineate the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-18) result in severe neuronal loss. Altogether, we emphasized the perspectives of cellular senescence up-regulated by EGFR and its associated membrane receptor molecules in the pathogenesis of AD as a target for a therapeutical alternative to intervene in AD.

Efficacy and Safety of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Combined with Cranial Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases from Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction. Brain metastases (BMs) are common in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which leads to a poor prognosis. As the two most effective strategies available, the use of combination of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and radiotherapy (RT) is still controversial. This protocol proposes a methodology for carrying out a systematic review and meta-analysis that is aimed at (1) focusing on the efficacy and safety role of EGFR-TKIs combined with RT for BMs from NSCLC and (2) displaying the difference in efficacy of EGFR-TKIs owing to the sites and number of BMs, different types of RT, EGFR mutation status, and the subtypes of EGFR mutations by subgroup analysis. Methods and Analysis. Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, Wanfang database, and VIP database will be searched from their inception until May 2022. Only randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs combined with RT on BMs of NSCLC will be included. Two reviewers will select the articles, assess the risk of bias, and extract data independently and in duplicate. The RoB 2 tool will be used to assess the quality of included studies. The meta-analysis of data synthesis will be performed with Stata 16. Publication bias will be assessed with the funnel plot method and the Egger test. Quality of the evidence will be evaluated by the GRADE system. Discussion. The approval of an ethical committee is not required. All the included trials will comply with the current ethical standards and the Declaration of Helsinki. Given the ongoing controversies regarding the optimal sequencing of the available and expanding treatment options for EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC with BMs, a synthesis of available, high-quality clinical research evidence is essential to advance our understanding in the treatment of this complex and common disease. This systematic review will evaluate available evidence, will try to provide optimized advice in the applications of EGFR-TKIs, and will be published in a high-quality journal. This study is registered with PROSPERO registration number CRD42021291509.

Rational application of gefitinib in NSCLC patients with sensitive EGFR mutations based on pharmacokinetics and metabolomics

Gefitinib has been available in the market for 20 years, but its pharmacokinetic mechanism of response is little known. In this study, we examined the pharmacokinetic and metabolomic profiles in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with sensitive EGFR mutations. A total of 216 advanced NSCLC patients were enrolled, and administered gefitinib at the standard dosage of 250 mg/day, which was established in heterogeneous subjects with non-sensitive mutations. We identified and quantified three main metabolites (named as M1, M2 and M3) in the plasma of patients, the correlations between the concentration of gefitinib/metabolites and efficacy were analyzed. In exploratory and validation set, gefitinib concentration was not correlated with clinical effects. Considering the result that the therapeutic effects of 250 mg/2-day was better than that of 250 mg/day in a multiple center clinical trial, the standard dose might be higher than that for maximal efficacy according to the hypothetical dose-response curve. Among the three metabolites, the IC₅₀ of M2 in HCC827 and PC9 cell lines was significantly lower, and Conc._brain/Conc._plasma of M2 in mice was significantly higher than those of gefitinib, suggesting its higher potential to penetrate blood-brain barrier and might be more effective in the treatment of brain metastatic tumor than gefitinib. Consistently and attractively, higher M2 plasma concentration was found to be correlated with better clinical outcome in patients with brain metastases (the median PFS of C_M2 < 12 ng/mL and C_M2 ≥ 12 ng/mL were 17.0 and 27.1 months, respectively, P = 0.038). The plasma concentration of M2 ≥ 12 ng/mL was a strong predictor of the PFS of NSCLC patients. In conclusion, for NSCLC patients with EGFR sensitive mutations, the standard dose is suspectable and could be decreased reasonably. M2 plays an important role in efficacy and may be more effective in the treatment of metastatic tumor than gefitinib.

The Cognitive Effects of Radiotherapy for Brain Metastases

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial neoplasm and are seen in upwards of 10-30% of patients with cancer. For decades, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) was the mainstay of treatment in these patients. While WBRT is associated with excellent rates of intracranial tumor control, studies have demonstrated a lack of survival benefit, and WBRT is associated with higher rates of cognitive deterioration and detrimental effects on quality of life. In recent years, strategies to mitigate this risk, such as the incorporation of memantine and hippocampal avoidance have been employed with improved results. Furthermore, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an appealing treatment option over the last decade in the management of brain metastases and is associated with superior cognitive preservation and quality of life when compared to WBRT. This review article evaluates the pathogenesis and impact of cranial irradiation on cognition in patients with brain metastases, as well as current and future risk mitigation techniques.

Blood-brain barrier: emerging trends on transport models and new-age strategies for therapeutics intervention against neurological disorders

The integrity of the blood–brain barrier (BBB) is essential for normal central nervous system (CNS) functioning. Considering the significance of BBB in maintaining homeostasis and the neural environment, we aim to provide an overview of significant aspects of BBB. Worldwide, the treatment of neurological diseases caused by BBB disruption has been a major challenge. BBB also restricts entry of neuro-therapeutic drugs and hinders treatment modalities. Hence, currently nanotechnology-based approaches are being explored on large scale as alternatives to conventional methodologies. It is necessary to investigate the in-depth characteristic features of BBB to facilitate the discovery of novel drugs that can successfully cross the barrier and target the disease effectively. It is imperative to discover novel strategies to treat life-threatening CNS diseases in humans. Therefore, insights regarding building blocks of BBB, activation of immune response on breach of this barrier, and various autoimmune neurological disorders caused due to BBB dysfunction are discussed. Further, special emphasis is given on delineating BBB disruption leading to CNS disorders. Moreover, various mechanisms of transport pathways across BBB, several novel strategies, and alternative routes by which drugs can be properly delivered into CNS are also discussed.

Low-level whole-brain radiation enhances theranostic potential of single-domain antibody fragments for human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive brain metastases

Background

Single-domain antibody fragments (aka V_HH, ~ 13 kDa) are promising delivery systems for brain tumor theranostics; however, achieving efficient delivery of V_HH to intracranial lesions remains challenging due to the tumor–brain barrier. Here, we evaluate low-dose whole-brain irradiation as a strategy to increase the delivery of an anti- human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) V_HH to breast cancer-derived intracranial tumors in mice.

Methods

Mice with intracranial HER2-positive BT474BrM3 tumors received 10-Gy fractionated cranial irradiation and were evaluated by noninvasive imaging. Anti-HER2 V_HH 5F7 was labeled with ¹⁸F, administered intravenously to irradiated mice and controls, and PET/CT imaging was conducted periodically after irradiation. Tumor uptake of ¹⁸F-labeled 5F7 in irradiated and control mice was compared by PET/CT image analysis and correlated with tumor volumes. In addition, longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) was conducted to visualize and quantify the potential effects of radiation on tumor perfusion and permeability.

Results

Increased ¹⁸F-labeled 5F7 intracranial tumor uptake was observed with PET in mice receiving cranial irradiation, with maximum tumor accumulation seen approximately 12 days post initial radiation treatment. No radiation-induced changes in HER2 expression were detected by Western blot, flow cytometry, or on tissue sections. DCE-MRI imaging demonstrated transiently increased tumor perfusion and permeability after irradiation, consistent with the higher tumor uptake of ¹⁸F-labeled anti-HER2 5F7 in irradiated mice.

Conclusion

Low-level brain irradiation induces dynamic changes in tumor vasculature that increase the intracranial tumor delivery of an anti-HER2 V_HH, which could facilitate the use of radiolabeled V_HH to detect, monitor, and treat HER2-expressing brain metastases.

Therapeutic effect of osimertinib plus cranial radiotherapy compared to osimertinib alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR-activating mutations and brain metastases: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The study aimed to compare the efficacy of osimertinib plus cranial radiotherapy (RT) with osimertinib alone in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and brain metastases (BMs).

METHODS

The clinical data of advanced NSCLC patients with BMs who received osimertinib were retrospectively collected. The patients were assigned to one of the two groups according to the therapeutic modality used: the osimertinib monotherapy group or the osimertinib plus RT group.

RESULTS

This was a retrospective study and 61 patients were included from December 2015 to August 2020. Forty patients received osimertinib monotherapy, and twenty-one patients received osimertinib plus RT. Radiotherapy included whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT, n = 14), WBRT with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT-SIB, n = 5) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS, n = 2). The median number of prior systemic therapies in the two groups was one. Intracranial and systemic ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the two groups. No difference in iPFS was observed between the two groups (median iPFS: 16.67 vs. 13.50 months, P = 0.836). The median OS was 29.20 months in the osimertinib plus RT group compared with 26.13 months in the osimertinib group (HR = 0.895, P = 0.826). In the L858R mutational subgroup of 31 patients, the osimertinib plus RT group had a longer OS (P = 0.046). In the exon 19 deletion mutational subgroup of 30 patients, OS in the osimertinib alone group was longer than that in the osimertinib plus RT group (P = 0.011). The incidence of any-grade adverse events was not significantly different between the osimertinib plus RT group and the osimertinib alone group (47.6% vs. 32.5%, P = 0.762). However, six patients (28.5%) experienced leukoencephalopathy in the osimertinib plus RT group, and 50% (3/6) of the leukoencephalopathy was greater than or equal to grade 3.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic effect of osimertinib with RT was similar to that of osimertinib alone in EGFR-positive NSCLC patients with BM. However, for patients with the L858R mutation, osimertinib plus RT could provide more benefit than osimertinib alone.

Modulation of the Blood-Brain Barrier for Drug Delivery to Brain

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) precisely controls brain microenvironment and neural activity by regulating substance transport into and out of the brain. However, it severely hinders drug entry into the brain, and the efficiency of various systemic therapies against brain diseases. Modulation of the BBB via opening tight junctions, inhibiting active efflux and/or enhancing transcytosis, possesses the potential to increase BBB permeability and improve intracranial drug concentrations and systemic therapeutic efficiency. Various strategies of BBB modulation have been reported and investigated preclinically and/or clinically. This review describes conventional and emerging BBB modulation strategies and related mechanisms, and safety issues according to BBB structures and functions, to try to give more promising directions for designing more reasonable preclinical and clinical studies.

Systemic Therapy for Lung Cancer Brain Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Systemic therapy for brain metastases (BM) is quickly moving from conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy toward targeted therapies, that allow a disruption of driver molecular pathways. The discovery of actionable driver mutations has led to the development of an impressive number of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, anaplastic-lymphoma-kinase (ALK) rearrangements, and other rare molecular alterations in patients bearing metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the brain, with remarkable results in terms of intracranial disease control and overall survival. Moreover, these drugs may delay the use of local therapies, such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). New drugs with higher molecular specificity and ability to cross the CNS barriers (BBB, BTB and blood-CSF) are being developed. Two major issues are related to targeted therapies. First, the emergence of a resistance is a common event, and a deeper understanding of molecular pathways that are involved is critical for the successful development of effective new targeted agents. Second, an early detection of tumor progression is of utmost importance to avoid the prolongation of an ineffective therapy while changing to another drug. In order to monitor over time the treatment to targeted therapies, liquid biopsy, that allows the detection in biofluids of either circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) or exosomes, is increasingly employed in clinical trials: with respect to BM the monitoring of both blood and CSF is necessary. Also, radiomics is being developed to predict the mutational status of the BM on MRI.For patients without druggable mutations or who do not respond to targeted agents, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is increasingly employed, alone or in combination with radiotherapy. Pseudoprogression after immunotherapy alone maybe a challenge for several months after the start of treatment, and the same is true for radionecrosis after the combination of immunotherapy and SRS. In this regard, the value of advanced MRI techniques and PET imaging for a better distinction of pseudoprogression/radionecrosis and true tumor progression is promising, but needs validation in large prospective datasets. Last, a new frontier in the near future will be chemoprevention (primary and secondary), but we need to identify among solid tumors those subgroups of patients with a higher risk of relapsing into the brain and novel drugs, active on either neoplastic or normal cells of the microenvironment, that are cooperating in the invasion of brain tissue.

Hype or hope - Can combination therapies with third-generation EGFR-TKIs help overcome acquired resistance and improve outcomes in EGFR-mutant advanced/metastatic NSCLC?

Three generations of epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) have been developed for treating advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR-activating mutations, while a fourth generation is undergoing preclinical assessment. Although initially effective, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs usually arises within a year due to the emergence of clones harboring multiple resistance mechanisms. Therefore, the combination of EGFR-TKIs with other therapeutic agents has emerged as a potential strategy to overcome resistance and improve clinical outcomes. However, results obtained so far are ambiguous and ideal therapies for patients who experience disease progression during treatment with EGFR-TKIs remain elusive. This review provides an updated landscape of EGFR-TKIs, along with a description of the mechanisms causing resistance to these drugs. Moreover, it discusses the current knowledge, limitations, and future perspective regarding the use of EGFR-TKIs in combination with other anticancer agents, supporting the need for bench-to-bedside approaches in selected populations.

Brain Metastasis Treatment: The Place of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and How to Facilitate Their Diffusion across the Blood-Brain Barrier

The incidence of brain metastases has been increasing constantly for the last 20 years, because of better control of metastases outside the brain, and the failure of most drugs to cross the blood–brain barrier at relevant pharmacological concentrations. Recent advances in the molecular biology of cancer have led to the identification of numerous molecular alterations, some of them targetable with the development of specific targeted therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors. In this narrative review, we set out to describe the state-of-the-art in the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma, lung cancer, and breast cancer brain metastases. We also report preclinical and clinical pharmacological data on brain exposure to tyrosine kinase inhibitors after oral administration and describe the most recent advances liable to facilitate their penetration of the blood–brain barrier at relevant concentrations and limit their physiological efflux.

Tumor habitat analysis by magnetic resonance imaging distinguishes tumor progression from radiation necrosis in brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery

OBJECTIVES

The identification of viable tumor after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is important for future targeted therapy. This study aimed to determine whether tumor habitat on structural and physiologic MRI can distinguish viable tumor from radiation necrosis of brain metastases after SRS.

METHOD

Multiparametric contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and cerebral blood volume (CBV) were obtained from 52 patients with 69 metastases, showing enlarging enhancing masses after SRS. Voxel-wise clustering identified three structural MRI habitats (enhancing, solid low-enhancing, and nonviable) and three physiologic MRI habitats (hypervascular cellular, hypovascular cellular, and nonviable). Habitat-based predictors for viable tumor or radiation necrosis were identified by logistic regression. Performance was validated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristics curve in an independent dataset with 24 patients.

RESULTS

None of the physiologic MRI habitats was indicative of viable tumor. Viable tumor was predicted by a high-volume fraction of solid low-enhancing habitat (low T2-weighted and low CE-T1-weighted values; odds ratio [OR] 1.74, p <.001) and a low-volume fraction of nonviable tissue habitat (high T2-weighted and low CE-T1-weighted values; OR 0.55, p <.001). Combined structural MRI habitats yielded good discriminatory ability in both development (AUC 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77-0.94) and validation sets (AUC 0.86, 95% CI:0.70-0.99), outperforming single ADC (AUC 0.64) and CBV (AUC 0.58) values. The site of progression matched with the solid low-enhancing habitat (72%, 8/11).

CONCLUSION

Solid low-enhancing and nonviable tissue habitats on structural MRI can help to localize viable tumor in patients with brain metastases after SRS.

KEY POINTS

• Structural MRI habitats helped to differentiate viable tumor from radiation necrosis. • Solid low-enhancing habitat was most helpful to find viable tumor. • Providing spatial information, the site of progression matched with solid low-enhancing habitat.

Nanomedicine Applications in Treatment of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma: Current State of the Art

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare but highly aggressive subtype of extra nodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), which is confined in the central nervous system (CNS). Despite recent advancements in treatment options, the overall prognosis of PCNSL remains poor. Among many unfavorable factors affecting efficacy, inadequate drug delivery into the CNS is still the thorniest challenge. Blood-brain barrier (BBB) constitutes a significant impediment, restricting entry of most therapeutics to the brain. Nanotechnology has offered great promise for brain diseases, as various nano-based drug delivery systems (NDDSs) have been developed for delivery of theranostic agents in to the CNS. These drug delivery systems possess significant advantages, including good feasibility, reliable safety profile, excellent BBB penetration and potent antitumor effects. As for treatment of PCNSL, numerous well-developed BBB-crossing nano-based strategies can be applied with proper modifications and improvements. Some exquisitely designed NDDSs specific for PCNSL have shown great potential. In this review, we provide a summary on current status of diagnosis and treatment of PCNSL, followed by an overview of BBB-crossing strategies applied in management of PCNSL, both novel and wellestablished. Finally, challenges and future perspectives in this field are also discussed.

Analyses of CNS Response to Osimertinib in Patients with T790M-Positive Advanced NSCLC from ASTRIS Korean Subset, Open-Label Real-World Study

Simple Summary

Patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer can have central nervous system (CNS) metastases during their disease course. A high unmet medical need exists especially for patients with T790M-positive NSCLC whose disease progressed after first-line EGFR-TKI. Osimertinib is a third-generation EGFR-TKI with selective activity for both sensitizing and EGFR T790M mutations and has improved CNS activity over first- and second-generation EGFR TKIs and chemotherapies. This study confirmed the clinical activity and CNS efficacy of osimertinib in an unselected real-world population.

Abstract

Up to 40% of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may develop central nervous system (CNS) metastases throughout their disease. Moreover, the first- and second-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors have limited efficacy because of their poor blood–brain barrier permeability. Therefore, we conducted preplanned analyses of ASTRIS, a clinical study of the third-generation EGFR-TKI osimertinib to demonstrate its potential role in intracranial response efficacies. We retrospectively examined 89 NSCLC patients with brain evaluation who were not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy and received osimertinib upon confirmation of the presence of the T790M mutation. We collected the information regarding patients’ baseline characteristics, baseline intracranial status, including leptomeningeal metastases (LM), and intracranial responses measured by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, using independent central review. The median age was 60 years, and 69.7% of the patients were female. Sixty-five patients (73.0%) had brain metastases (BM) at baseline and nineteen patients (23.5%) had additional LM. Among patients with brain metastases, 24 (36.9%) had ≥1 measurable brain metastases and 16 were evaluated for the objective response. In the CNS evaluable for response set, the intracranial objective response rate (cORR) and disease control rate (cDCR) were 62.5% (95% confidence interval (CI), 38.3–82.6%) and 93.8% (95% CI, 74.3–99.3%), respectively. The median intracranial progression-free survival (cPFS) was 13.0 (95% CI, 7.21–18.8) months, including patients with measurable and non-measurable BM or LM. Our cORR, cDCR, and cPFS were comparable to those observed in previous clinical trials. The outcome of this study helps to demonstrate the potential role of intracranial efficacies of osimertinib 80 mg administration in T790M-positive advanced NSCLC with/without BM or LM.

Whole-brain radiotherapy with and without concurrent erlotinib in NSCLC with brain metastases: a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled phase III trial

BACKGROUND

Erlotinib combined with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) demonstrated a favorable objective response rate in a phase II single-arm trial of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. We assessed whether concurrent erlotinib with WBRT is safe and benefits patients in a phase III, randomized trial.

METHODS

NSCLC patients with two or more brain metastases were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to WBRT (n = 115) or WBRT combined with erlotinib arms (n = 109). The primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) and cognitive function (CF) was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

RESULTS

A total of 224 patients from 10 centers across China were randomized to treatments. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. Median iPFS for WBRT concurrent erlotinib was 11.2 months vs 9.2 months for WBRT-alone (P = .601). Median PFS and overall survival (OS) of combination group were 5.3 vs 4.0 months (P = .825) and 12.9 vs 10.0 months (P = .545), respectively, compared with WBRT-alone. In EGFR-mutant patients, iPFS (14.6 vs 12.8 months; P = .164), PFS (8.8 vs 6.4 months; P = .702), and OS (17.5 vs 16.9 months; P = .221) were not significantly improved in combination group over WBRT-alone. Moreover, there were no significant differences in patients experiencing MMSE score change between the treatments.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent erlotinib with WBRT didn't improve iPFS and excessive CF detriment either in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population or in EGFR-mutant patients compared with WBRT-alone, suggesting that while safe for patients already taking the drug, there is no justification for adding concurrent EGFR-TKI with WBRT for the treatment of brain metastases. Trial registration: Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT01887795.

Emerging principles of brain immunology and immune checkpoint blockade in brain metastases

Brain metastases are the most common type of brain tumours, harbouring an immune microenvironment that can in principle be targeted via immunotherapy. Elucidating some of the immunological intricacies of brain metastases has opened a therapeutic window to explore the potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this globally lethal disease. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that tumour cells hijack the immune regulatory mechanisms in the brain for the benefit of their own survival and progression. Nonetheless, the role of the immune checkpoint in the complex interplays between cancers cells and T cells and in conferring resistance to therapy remains under investigation. Meanwhile, early phase trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors have reported clinical benefit in patients with brain metastases from melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. In this review, we explore the workings of the immune system in the brain, the immunology of brain metastases, and the current status of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of brain metastases.

The Pharmacology of Xenobiotics after Intracerebro Spinal Fluid Administration: Implications for the Treatment of Brain Tumors

The incidence of brain metastasis has been increasing for 10 years, with poor prognosis, unlike the improvement in survival for extracranial tumor localizations. Since recent advances in molecular biology and the development of specific molecular targets, knowledge of the brain distribution of drugs has become a pharmaceutical challenge. Most anticancer drugs fail to cross the blood-brain barrier. In order to get around this problem and penetrate the brain parenchyma, the use of intrathecal administration has been developed, but the mechanisms governing drug distribution from the cerebrospinal fluid to the brain parenchyma are poorly understood. Thus, in this review we discuss the pharmacokinetics of drugs after intrathecal administration, their penetration of the brain parenchyma and the different systems causing their efflux from the brain to the blood.

[Research Progress in the Treatment of Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The most common pathological type of lung cancer is non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The incidence of brain metastases caused by NSCLC has been on the rise. Brain metastasis seriously affects the patient's cognitive function, survival time and quality of life, and the prognosis is extremely poor. The natural course of the disease is about 1 mon-3 mon. After treatment, the median survival time is only 3 mon-6 mon, the one year survival rate is 14%, and the two years survival rate is only 7.6%. The location, number, and size of brain metastases are related to their symptoms and survival. Patients with central nervous system symptoms have a worse prognosis. The goal of brain metastasis treatment is to optimize overall survival and quality of life, and to prioritize the preservation of neurocognitive functions. At present, the main treatments for brain metastases in NSCLC include radiotherapy, surgery, chemotherapy, molecular targeting, and immunotherapy. Clinically, it is necessary to conduct a multidisciplinary assessment of the best treatment methods for patients according to the heterogeneity of patients (clinical characteristics, pathological types, tissue types, etc). This article aims to review the research progress of current treatment methods.
.

Radiotherapy in combination with systemic therapies for brain metastases: current status and progress

Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common cause of intracranial neoplasms in adults with poor prognosis. Most BMs originate from lung cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma. Radiotherapy (RT), including whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiation surgery (SRS), has been widely explored and is considered a mainstay anticancer treatment for BMs. Over the past decade, the advent of novel systemic therapies has revolutionized the treatment of BMs. In this context, there is a strong rationale for using a combination of treatments based on RT, with the aim of achieving both local disease control and extracranial disease control. This review focuses on describing the latest progress in RT as well as the synergistic effects of the optimal combinations of RT and systemic treatment modalities for BMs, to provide perspectives on current treatments.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Can Improve the Survival of Patients with Multiple Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

Objective

To observe whether whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) can bring survival benefits to patients with multiple brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and determine the best time for WBRT intervention.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 148 patients diagnosed with EGFR gene-mutated NSCLC. All patients had multiple BM and received EGFR-TKI targeted therapy, which was performed to observe whether WBRT can bring survival benefits, and whether the choice of WBRT timing affects the survival of patients.

Results

Among the 148 patients with NSCLC treated with EGFR-TKI, 76 received WBRT; 72 were without WBRT. WBRT can reduce the intracranial progression rate in the patients (19.7% vs 33.3%, P=0.040), thus improving the intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) (median iPFS: 11.9 months versus 10.2 months, P=0.039) and overall survival (OS) (median OS: 21.0 months versus 16.7 months, P=0.043). Multivariate analysis showed that WBRT (HR=0.606; 95% CI: 0.403-0.912, P=0.016) and the low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR=1.884; 95% CI: 1.120-3.170, P=0.017) are independent prognostic factors in all patients. Further subgroup analysis showed that the choice of WBRT time had no effect on patient survival.

Conclusion

WBRT can improve the survival of patients with multiple BM from NSCLC receiving EGFR-TKI targeted therapy and is an independent prognostic factor. The choice of RT time has no effect on patient survival.

Tumor Primary Site and Histology Subtypes Role in Radiotherapeutic Management of Brain Metastases

Randomized controlled trials have failed to report any survival advantage for WBRT combined with SRS in the management of brain metastases, despite the enhanced local and distant control in comparison to each treatment alone. Literature review have revealed important role of primary histology of the tumor when dealing with brain metastases. NSCLC responds better to combined approach even when there was only single brain metastasis present while breast cancer has registered better survival with SRS alone probably due to better response of primary tumor to advancement in surgical and chemotherapeutic agents. Furthermore, mutation status (EGFR/ALK) in lung cancer and receptor status (ER/PR/HER2) in breast cancer also exhibit diversity in their response to radiotherapy. Radioresistant tumors like renal cell carcinoma and melanoma brain metastases have achieved better results when treated with SRS alone. Secondly, single brain metastasis may benefit from local and distant brain control achieved with combined treatment. These diverse outcomes suggest a primary histology-based analysis of the radiotherapy regimens (WBRT, SRS, or their combination) would more ideally establish the role of radiotherapy in the management of brain metastases. Molecularly targeted therapeutic and immunotherapeutic agents have revealed synergism with radiation therapy particularly SRS in treating cancer patients with brain metastases. Clinical updates in this regard have also been reviewed.

A phase II, multicenter, two cohort study of 160 mg osimertinib in EGFR T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease who progressed on prior EGFR TKI therapy

BACKGROUND

Up to 40% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) present with disease progression in the central nervous system (CNS), either as brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal metastases (LM). Osimertinib (80 mg), a third-generation, irreversible, oral EGFR TKI, has shown efficacy in active CNS metastases. However, efficacy of osimertinib 160 mg in BM or LM is unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective, single-arm, two cohort study evaluated the efficacy of osimertinib 160 mg in T790M-positive BM or LM NSCLC patients who progressed on prior EGFR TKI (NCT03257124) treatment. The primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) (H₁ = 30%) for the BM cohort and overall survival (OS) (H₁ = 5 months) for the LM cohort.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 10.1 months and 9.6 months for the BM and LM cohorts, respectively. In the BM cohort, intracranial ORR and disease control rate were 55.0% and 77.5%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-16.6]; the median OS was 16.9 months [95% CI 7.9-not reached (NR)]. In the LM cohort, intracranial disease control rate was 92.5% and complete response rate was 12.5%. The median OS was 13.3 months (95% CI 9.1-NR); the median PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI 7.2-NR). Subgroup analyses based on previous exposure to T790M-targeting agents, including osimertinib 80 mg or other third-generation EGFR TKIs, showed no difference in PFS in both the BM (n = 18, P = 0.39) and LM (n = 17, P = 0.85) cohorts. Previous radiotherapy favored PFS in the BM cohort (hazard ratio 0.42, P = 0.04). The most common adverse events were decreased appetite, diarrhea, and skin rash; however, most were grade 1-2.

CONCLUSION

Thus, osimertinib 160 mg demonstrated promising ORR and survival benefit with a tolerable safety profile in EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients with CNS metastasis who progressed on prior EGFR TKIs.

Safety and CSF distribution of high-dose erlotinib and gefitinib in patients of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases

PURPOSE

Patients of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases have limited treatment options. High-dose erlotinib (HDE) and gefitinib (HDG) have been tried in the past. This study investigates the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) disposition and safety of both, high-dose erlotinib and gefitinib regimens.

METHODS

Eleven and nine patients were treated with erlotinib and gefitinib, respectively. All patients received 1 week of standard dose of erlotinib (150 mg OD) or gefitinib (250 mg OD), followed by the high dose (1500 mg weekly for erlotinib and 1250 mg OD for gefitinib) from day 8. Blood and CSF samples were collected on days 7 and 15, 4 h after the morning dose and drug levels determined using LC-MS/MS. Adverse events were documented as per CTCAE 4.03 till day 15.

RESULTS

Pulsatile HDE and daily HDG resulted in 1.4- and 1.9-fold increase in CSF levels, respectively. A constant 2% CSF penetration rate was observed across both doses of erlotinib, while for gefitinib the penetration rate for high dose was half that of the standard dose suggesting a nonlinear disposition. Three patients on HDE treatment discontinued treatment after the first dose due to intolerable toxicities, whereas HDG was better tolerated with no treatment discontinuations. Since CSF disposition of gefitinib followed saturable kinetics, a lower dose of 750 mg was found to achieve CSF concentrations comparable to that of the 1250 mg dose.

CONCLUSIONS

HDG was better tolerated than HDE. CSF disposition of gefitinib was found to be saturable at a higher dose. Based on these findings, the dose of 750 mg OD should be considered for further evaluation in this setting.

Icotinib is as efficacious as gefitinib for brain metastasis of EGFR mutated non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases is very poor. Currently, therapeutic methods for this patient population include whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), surgery, radiosurgery and systemic treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) could be effective on cerebral metastases of mutated NSCLC. However, which EGFR-TKIs is more appropriate is still unknown.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of advanced NSCLC patients with brain metastases for EGFR targeted therapy from November 2013 to April 2018 at Dongguan People's Hospital, Southern Medical University, China. A total of 43 patients were recruit in this study. Among them, 21 cases received icotinib (125 mg, thrice a day) and 22 cases received gefitinib (250 mg, once a day) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point of this study was intracranial PFS (iPFS). The relationships between therapeutic arms and patients characteristics were performed using Pearson's chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. The differences in PFS among the two arms were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log rank tests.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference of intracranial ORR (66.6% versus 59.1%, P = 0.62) and DCR (85.7% versus 81.8%, P = 0.73) between the two arms. The median intracranial PFS (iPFS) for icotinib and gefitinib arms were 8.4 months (95% CI, 5.4 to 11.3 months) and 10.6 months (95% CI, 6.3 to 14.8 months), respectively (P = 0.17). Adverse events of the two study arms were generally mild. None of the patients experienced dose reduction of EGFR-TKIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that icotinib and gefitinib had similar efficacy for brain metastasis of EGFR mutated NSCLC. Large randomized studies are suggested to further illuminate the effect of these two EGFR-TKIs on cerebral lesions of NSCLC.

The blood-brain barrier and blood-tumour barrier in brain tumours and metastases

For a blood-borne cancer therapeutic agent to be effective, it must cross the blood vessel wall to reach cancer cells in adequate quantities, and it must overcome the resistance conferred by the local microenvironment around cancer cells. The brain microenvironment can thwart the effectiveness of drugs against primary brain tumours as well as brain metastases. In this Review, we highlight the cellular and molecular components of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a specialized neurovascular unit evolved to maintain brain homeostasis. Tumours are known to compromise the integrity of the BBB, resulting in a vasculature known as the blood-tumour barrier (BTB), which is highly heterogeneous and characterized by numerous distinct features, including non-uniform permeability and active efflux of molecules. We discuss the challenges posed by the BBB and BTB for drug delivery, how multiple cell types dictate BBB function and the role of the BTB in disease progression and treatment. Finally, we highlight emerging molecular, cellular and physical strategies to improve drug delivery across the BBB and BTB and discuss their impact on improving conventional as well as emerging treatments, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and engineered T cells. A deeper understanding of the BBB and BTB through the application of single-cell sequencing and imaging techniques, and the development of biomarkers of BBB integrity along with systems biology approaches, should enable new personalized treatment strategies for primary brain malignancies and brain metastases.

Therapeutic effect of whole brain radiotherapy on advanced NSCLC between EGFR TKI-naïve and TKI-resistant

Background

The development of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has dramatically improved the prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical outcome with or without EGFR-TKI resistance before WBRT and the sequence between EGFT-TKIs and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who developed multiple brain metastases (BMs).

Patients and methods

Three hundred forty-four EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients with multiple BMs were reviewed. Enrolled patients were divided into TKI-naïve group and TKI-resistant group. The intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed via the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

For patients with multiple BMs treated by WBRT, the median intracranial PFS and OS were longer in the TKI-naïve group than those in the TKI-resistant group, but there were no statistically significant between two groups (Intracranial PFS: 7.7 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.052; OS: 11.2 vs. 9.2 months, p = 0.106). For patients with Lung-molGPA 0–2, no significant differences in median intracranial PFS (6.2 vs. 5.2 months, p = 0.123) and OS (7.8 vs. 6.7 months, p = 0.514) between TKI-naïve and TKI-resistant groups. For patients with Lung-molGPA 2.5–4, intracranial PFS: 12.8 vs. 10.1 months; OS: 23.3 vs. 15.3 months.

Conclusions

Our study found that there were no difference in intracranial PFS and OS in all patients between the two groups of TKI-naïve and TKI-resistant. But for patients in subgroup of Lung-molGPA 2.5–4, there were a better intracranial PFS and OS in TKI-naïve group.

The optional approach of oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases in the new generation targeted therapies era

In recent years, the study of the molecular characteristics of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has highlighted a specific role of some genes that represent important therapeutic targets, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS-1) and v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF). Patients with oncogene-addicted cancer benefit more from therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) than from chemotherapy. The brain is a preferred site for tumor spread in these patients. In addition, given greater control of extracranial disease and prolonged survival, the brain is often the first site of progression. Therefore, there is great interest in therapeutic approaches that optimize the control of intracranial disease associated with systemic drugs that, by penetrating the blood-brain barrier (BBB), may improve local control. On the latter, radiotherapy provides excellent efficacy but following the results of clinical trials with new brain penetrant drugs, the question of how and especially when to perform brain radiotherapy in patients with oncogene-addicted NSCLC remains open. Prospective studies may indicate which patients are most likely to benefit from combined use or in what sequence they will undergo systemic and radiotherapy treatment. Due to the heterogeneity of patients and the introduction of new generation TKIs, a multidisciplinary assessment for the best management of therapies in NSCLC patients with molecular driver alterations and brain metastases (BM) is required.

Improving CNS Delivery to Brain Metastases by Blood-Tumor Barrier Disruption

Brain metastases encompass nearly 80% of all intracranial tumors. A late stage diagnosis confers a poor prognosis, with patients typically surviving less than 2 years. Poor survival can be equated to limited effective treatment modalities. One reason for the failure rates is the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-tumor barrier (BTB) that limit the access of potentially effective chemotherapeutics to metastatic lesions. Strategies to overcome these barriers include new small molecule entities capable of crossing into the brain parenchyma, novel formulations of existing chemotherapies, and disruptive techniques. Here, we review BBB physiology and BTB pathophysiology. Additionally, we review the limitations of routinely practiced therapies and three current methods being explored for BBB/BTB disruption for improved delivery of chemotherapy to brain tumors.

Brain MRI imaging characteristics predict treatment response and outcome in patients with de novo brain metastasis of EGFR-mutated NSCLC

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and de novo brain metastasis (BM) have poor prognosis. We aim to investigate the characteristic of brain magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and the association with the treatment response of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) for lung cancer with BM.EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with BM from October 2013 to December 2017 in a tertiary referral center were retrospectively analyzed. Patient's age, sex, cell type, EGFR mutation status, treatment, and characteristics of BM were collected. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. The efficacy of different EGFR-TKIs were also analyzed.Among the 257 eligible patients, 144 patients with Exon 19 deletion or Exon 21 L858R were included for analysis. The erlotinib group had the best progression free survival (PFS) (median PFS 13 months, P = .04). The overall survival (OS) revealed no significant difference between three EGFR-TKI groups. Brain MR imaging features including tumor necrosis, rim enhancement and specific tumor locations (frontal lobe, putamen or cerebellum) were factors associated with poor prognosis. Patients with poor prognostic imaging features, the high-risk group, who received erlotinib had the best PFS (median PFS 12 months, P < .001). However, the OS revealed no significant difference between 3 EGFR-TKI groups. The low risk group patients had similar PFS and OS treated with three different EGFR-TKIs.In NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutation and de novo BM, those with poor prognostic brain MR characteristics, erlotinib provided better PFS than afatinib or gefitinib.