Increasing Rates of Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Escherichia coli Isolated From the Blood and Urine of Patients with Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Global impact of antibacterial resistance in patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Patients with hematologic malignancies and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at high risk of developing bacterial infections. These patients may suffer severe consequences from these infections if they do not receive immediate effective therapies, and thus are uniquely threatened by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Here, we outline how the emergence of specific resistant bacteria threatens the effectiveness of established approaches to prevent and treat infections in this population. The emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance among Enterobacterales and viridans group streptococci may decrease the effectiveness of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during neutropenia. The emergence of Enterobacterales that produce extended-spectrum β-lactamases or carbapenemases and of increasingly resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa may result in neutropenic patients experiencing delayed time to active antibacterial therapy, and consequently worse clinical outcomes. The ability to select targeted antibacterial therapies after the availability of susceptibility data may be limited in patients infected with metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa. Vancomycin-resistant enterococci and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia can cause breakthrough infections in patients already being treated with broad-spectrum β-lactam antibiotics. Resistance can also limit the ability to provide oral stepdown antibacterial therapy for patients who could otherwise be discharged from hospitalization. We also outline strategies that have the potential to mitigate the negative impact of antimicrobial resistance, including interventions based on active screening for colonization with resistant bacteria and the use of novel rapid diagnostic assays. Additional research is needed to better understand how these strategies can be leveraged to combat the emerging crisis of antimicrobial resistance in patients with hematologic malignancies and HCT recipients.

Nanopore-Targeted Sequencing Improves the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Serious Infections

Serious infections are characterized by rapid progression, poor prognosis, and difficulty in diagnosis. Recently, a new technique known as nanopore-targeted sequencing (NTS) was developed that facilitates the rapid and accurate detection of pathogenic microorganisms and is extremely suitable for patients with serious infections. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical application of NTS in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with serious infections. We developed an NTS technology that could detect microorganisms within a 6-h window based on the amplification of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria, the internal transcribed spacer region of fungi, and the rpoB gene of Mycobacterium. The NTS detection results were compared with those of blood cultures and anal swabs from 50 patients with blood diseases suffering serious infections. The patient's condition before and after NTS was compared. The response rate and the infection-related mortality after the adjustment of antibiotics based on NTS were calculated. The positivity rate of pathogens was highest in NTS (90%), followed by blood culture (32.6%) and anal swabs (14.6%). After adjusting antibiotics for bacteria and fungi detected by NTS, the patients' condition improved significantly. Moreover, the response rate of anti-infective treatment based on NTS was 93.02% (40/43), and infection-related mortality was reduced to 0. NTS is an effective method to identify pathogens in the blood specimens of patients with serious infections and can guide anti-infection treatment and reduce infection-related mortality. IMPORTANCE We introduce the application of NTS in blood samples of patients with serious infections and expound the efficiency and accuracy of NTS in detecting pathogenic microorganisms. Our work builds on the considerable interest of the scientific community in the management of serious infection. This issue is becoming more pressing, especially since the incidence of blood diseases is increasing year by year and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has been widely used in benign and malignant blood diseases in recent years. The infection progression of these patients is faster, and the study further demonstrates the effectiveness of NTS in guiding the diagnosis and treatment of patients with severe infections. We firmly believe that this method will guide clinicians to adjust anti-infection strategies and bring significant benefits to patients, and our study will have implications for the future clinical application of NTS in all kinds of patients with serious infections.

Bone marrow transplantation for acquired aplastic anemia: What's new

Bone marrow transplantation is a major therapeutic option for patients with acquired severe aplastic anaemia: improved survival has been achieved in younger patients, thanks to better donor selection, conditioning regimens and graft versus host disease prophylaxis, together with improved supportive care, including diagnosis and treatment of opportunistic infections. This has not been the case for older patients over the age of 40 years. We will discuss transplantation platforms as used for different donor types and we will analyse major breakthroughs of the last years: the combination of Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide as a conditioning regimen, the use of alternative donors including HLA haploidentical related donors and new strategies to prevent acute and chronic graft versus host disease, including post transplantation Cyclophosphamide. These changes extend the option of a bone marrow transplantation for patients who lack an HLA matched donor and appear to improve engraftment and reduce graft versus host disease: whether this will be true for all age groups is currently being investigated.

Update in clinical and mouse microbiota research in allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The intestinal microbiota plays a critical role in intestinal homeostasis and immune regulation and has been recognized as a predictor of clinical outcome in patients undergoing allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) and specifically a determinant of the severity of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in mouse models. As GVHD is the most important cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allo-HCT, understanding the mechanisms by which modifying the microbiota may prevent or decrease the severity of GVHD would represent an important advance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Microbiota injury was observed globally and higher diversity at peri-engraftment was associated with lower mortality. Lactose is a dietary factor that promotes post-allo-HCT Enterococcus expansion, which is itself associated with mortality from GVHD in patients and exacerbates GVHD in mice. Bacterial and fungal bloodstream infections are preceded by intestinal colonization with a corresponding organism, supporting the gut as a source for many bloodstream infections. Metabolomic profiling studies showed that GVHD is associated with changes in faecal and plasma microbiota-derived molecules.

SUMMARY

In this review, we highlight some of the most recent and important findings in clinical and mouse microbiota research, as it relates to allo-HCT. Many of these are already being translated into clinical trials that have the potential to change future practice in the care of patients.

Antibiotic-Resistant Infections and Treatment Challenges in the Immunocompromised Host: An Update

This article reviews antibiotic resistance and treatment of bacterial infections in the growing number of patients who are immunocompromised: solid organ transplant recipients, the neutropenic host, and persons with human immunodeficiency virus and AIDS. Specific mechanisms of resistance in both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, as well as newer treatment options are addressed elsewhere and are only briefly discussed in the context of the immunocompromised host.

Is it time to reconsider prophylactic antimicrobial use for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? a narrative review of antimicrobials in stem cell transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) is a life-saving procedure for multiple types of hematological cancer, autoimmune diseases, and genetic-linked metabolic diseases in humans. Recipients of HSCT transplant are at high risk of microbial infections that significantly correlate with the presence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and the degree of immunosuppression. Infection in HSCT patients is a leading cause of life-threatening complications and mortality.

AREAS COVERED

This review covers issues pertinent to infection in the HSCT patient, including bacterial and viral infection; strategies to reduce GVHD; infection patterns; resistance and treatment options; adverse drug reactions to antimicrobials, problems of antimicrobial resistance; perturbation of the microbiome; the role of prebiotics, probiotics, and antimicrobial peptides. We highlight potential strategies to minimize the use of antimicrobials.

EXPERT OPINION

Measures to control infection and its transmission remain significant HSCT management policy and planning issues. Transplant centers need to consider carefully prophylactic use of antimicrobials for neutropenic patients. The judicious use of appropriate antimicrobials remains a crucial part of the treatment protocol. However, antimicrobials' adverse effects cause microbiome diversity and dysbiosis and have been shown to increase morbidity and mortality.

Reducing infectious complications after allogeneic stem cell transplant

INTRODUCTION

Infections remain a significant problem, in patients undergoing an allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) and efforts have been made over the years, to reduce the incidence, morbidity and mortality of infectious complications.

AREAS COVERED

This manuscript is focused on the epidemiology, risk factors and prevention of infections after allogeneic HSCT. A systematic literature review was performed using the PubMed database, between November 2019 and January 2020, with the following MeSH terms: stem-cell transplantation, infection, fungal, bacterial, viral, prophylaxis, vaccines, prevention. The authors reviewed all the publications, and following a common revision, a summary report was made and results were divided in three sections: bacterial, fungal and viral infections.

EXPERT OPINION

Different infections occur in the early, intermediate and late post-transplant period, due to distinct risk factors. Improved diagnostic techniques, pre-emtive therapy and better prophylaxis of immunologic complications, have reduced the morbidity and mortality of infections. The role of the gut microbiota is under careful scrutiny and may further help us to identify high-risk patients.

Prevalence, Risk Factors And Treatment Of The Most Common Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections In Liver Transplant Recipients: A Review

Advances in surgical techniques and immunosuppressive agents have made solid organ transplant (Tx) an important strategy for treatment of end-stage organ failures. However, the incidence of infections following Tx due to Gram-negative pathogens is on the rise. These infections are associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients following transplantation, including liver Tx. Thus, managing infections in liver Tx recipients is a big challenge, requiring prompt medical attention. Considering the important effect of Gram-negative bacterial infections on the outcomes of liver Tx recipients, the most prevalent Gram-negative pathogens including Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli will be discussed in this review.

Rethinking Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in the Transplant Patient in the World of Emerging Resistant Organisms-Where Are We Today?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of prophylactic antibiotics during the neutropenic period in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been the standard of care at most institutions for the past 20 years. We sought to review the benefits and risks of this practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Emerging data has highlighted the potential costs of antibacterial prophylaxis, from selecting for antibiotic resistance to perturbing the microbiome and contributing to increase risk for Clostridium difficile and perhaps graft-versus-host-disease, conditions which may lead to poorer outcomes. Though in many studies prophylactic antibiotics improved morbidity and mortality outcomes, the potential harms including antibiotic resistance, Clostridium difficile infection, and alterations of the gut microbiome should be considered. Future studies aimed to better risk-stratify patients and limit the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics are warranted.

Fluoroquinolone Prophylaxis Is Highly Effective for the Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in Autologous Stem Cell Transplant Patients

Patients undergoing stem cell transplant (SCT) for the treatment of hematologic malignancy are at increased risk for central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). The use of prophylactic antibiotics to prevent CLABSIs in the setting of autologous SCT is of unclear benefit. We aimed to evaluate the impact of levofloxacin prophylaxis on reducing CLABSIs in this high-risk population. Patients undergoing autologous SCT at a tertiary care hospital received levofloxacin prophylaxis from January 13, 2016 to January 12, 2017. Levofloxacin was administered from autologous SCT (day 0) until day 13, absolute neutrophil count > 500/mm³, or neutropenic fever, whichever occurred first. Clinical outcomes were compared with a baseline group who underwent autologous SCT but did not receive antibacterial prophylaxis during the previous year. The primary endpoint was incidence of CLABSIs assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression. A total of 324 patients underwent autologous SCT during the entire study period, with 150 receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis during the intervention period. The rate of CLABSIs was reduced from 18.4% during the baseline period to 6.0% during the intervention period. On multivariable analysis levofloxacin prophylaxis significantly reduced CLABSI incidence (hazard ratio, .33; 95% confidence interval [CI], .16 to .69; P = .003). There was also a reduction in the risk of neutropenic fever (odds ratio [OR], .23; 95% CI, .14 to .39; P < .001) and a trend toward a reduction in intensive care unit transfer for sepsis (OR, .33; 95% CI, .09 to 1.24; P = .10) in patients receiving levofloxacin prophylaxis. Notably, there was no increase in Clostridium difficile infection in the levofloxacin group (OR, .66; 95% CI, .29 to 1.49; P = .32). Levofloxacin prophylaxis was effective in reducing CLABSIs and neutropenic fever in patients undergoing autologous SCT. Further studies are needed to identify specific patient groups who will benefit most from antibiotic prophylaxis.

Impact of fluoroquinolone prophylaxis during neutropenia on bloodstream infection: Data from a surveillance program in 8755 patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy for haematologic malignancies between 2009 and 2014

OBJECTIVES

Antibacterial chemoprophylaxis with fluoroquinolones (FQPx) has been commonly used in cancer patients with neutropenia, but its efficacy has been challenged by the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance.

METHODS

The impact of FQPx on bloodstream infections (BSI) during neutropenia after high-dose chemotherapy for haematologic malignancies was evaluated through a multicenter hospital infection surveillance system for the period 2009-2014.

RESULTS

Among 8755 patients (4223 allogeneic [allo-] HSCT, 3602 autologous [auto-] HSCT, 930 high-dose chemotherapy for acute leukemia [HDC]), 5302 (61%) had received FQPx. Administration of FQPx was associated with fewer Gram-negative BSI in the overall study cohort patients (4.6% vs. 7.7%, adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 0.59, 95%CI 0.50-0.70), in patients with HDC (3.7% vs. 9.2%, adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio [aSHR] 0.40, 95%CI 0.22-0.70) and auto-HSCT patients (4% vs. 9%, aSHR 0.43, 95%CI 0.33-0.56). In HDC patients, FQPx was associated with a marked reduction in all-cause mortality during neutropenia (2.3% vs. 7.8%, aSHR 0.30, 95%CI 0.15-0.58). Patients receiving FQPx had significantly more BSIs due to ESBL-positive Enterobacteriacea (0.8 vs. 0.3%, RR 2.2, 95%CI 1.17-4.26). BSIs by MRSA (n = 5) and VRE (n = 11) were rare in our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

As used in the participating centers, FQPx was associated with reduced Gram-negative BSI and improved survival among HDC patients. Among HSCT patients, the benefits were less clear. If adapted to local resistance patterns and patient characteristics, FQPx still may be useful in the management of patients with haematologic malignancies.

Complications of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Bacterial infections

Bacterial infections remain a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), especially in the pre-engraftment phase. The risk of bacterial infections is mainly related to neutropenia, mucositis, and the presence of vascular lines. Most parts of the world have witnessed a shift in epidemiology toward Gram-negative bacteria; a large proportion of which are resistant to fluoroquinolones, extended-spectrum beta-lactams, carbapenems, and in some units even colistin. Meticulous infection control practices are essential for prevention of bacterial infections in HSCT. The role of routine prophylactic antibiotics is limited in settings with high rates of bacterial resistance. If used, prophylactic antibiotics should be limited to high-risk patients, and the agents are selected based on local resistance profiles. Neutropenic fever is a medical emergency in most HSCT recipients. Prompt clinical evaluation is paramount, along with the intravenous administration of appropriate empiric antimicrobials, typically an antipseudomonal beta-lactam agent. Glycopeptides should only be considered if the patient is hemodynamically unstable or Gram-positive infection is suspected. Additional Gram-negative agents, such as colistin or aminoglycosides, may be added if extensive Gram-negative resistance is expected. To mitigate increasing bacterial resistance, empiric antibiotic regimens should be rationalized or discontinued as soon as possible.

Low rates of antibiotic resistance and infectious mortality in a cohort of high-risk hematology patients: A single center, retrospective analysis of blood stream infection

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a medical emergency and can represent a life-threatening complication for hematology patients treated with intensive chemotherapy regimens. In clinical practice, the diagnostic yield of blood cultures and other investigations which aim to identify a causative organism or site of infection is low. We have retrospectively examined all blood cultures collected in a “real world” cohort of patients receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia and patients with aggressive lymphoma treated with Hyper-CVAD/MTX-cytarabine, at a single tertiary center over a five-year period. In this cohort, the 30-day mortality following confirmed blood stream infection (BSI) was 5.9%, which is lower than most reports in the recent literature. We compared the blood culture results of inpatients undergoing induction chemotherapy and outpatients presenting with fevers and found a significantly higher rate of proven BSI in the outpatient group. In all settings, gram-negative organisms were most common. The rate of resistance to first-line empiric antibiotics among pathogenic isolates was 11.6% in the whole cohort, independent of blood culture circumstances. There was a trend to higher resistance rates among inpatients undergoing induction chemotherapy compared to patients presenting to the emergency department (17.4% vs 7.5%) but this did not reach statistical significance. We also report low rates of ciprofloxacin resistance (5% of isolates), in a center where universal fluoroquinolone prophylaxis is not employed. Our low resistance and mortality rates support our current therapeutic strategies, however presence of resistant organisms across the spectrum of indications for BC collection highlights the importance of surveilling local patterns, escalating antimicrobial therapy in the deteriorating patient, and considering advanced techniques for the rapid identification of resistance in this patient population.