1
|
Capon TR, Garner MG, Tapsuwan S, Roche S, Breed AC, Liu S, Miller C, Bradhurst R, Hamilton S. A Simulation Study of the Use of Vaccination to Control Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreaks Across Australia. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:648003. [PMID: 34458348 PMCID: PMC8385296 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.648003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examines the potential for foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) control strategies that incorporate vaccination to manage FMD spread for a range of incursion scenarios across Australia. Stakeholder consultation was used to formulate control strategies and incursion scenarios to ensure relevance to the diverse range of Australian livestock production regions and management systems. The Australian Animal Disease Spread model (AADIS) was used to compare nine control strategies for 13 incursion scenarios, including seven control strategies incorporating vaccination. The control strategies with vaccination differed in terms of their approaches for targeting areas and species. These strategies are compared with two benchmark strategies based on stamping out only. Outbreak size and duration were compared in terms of the total number of infected premises, the duration of the control stage of an FMD outbreak, and the number of vaccinated animals. The three key findings from this analysis are as follows: (1) smaller outbreaks can be effectively managed by stamping out without vaccination, (2) the size and duration of larger outbreaks can be significantly reduced when vaccination is used, and (3) different vaccination strategies produced similar reductions in the size and duration of an outbreak, but the number of animals vaccinated varied. Under current international standards for regaining FMD-free status, vaccinated animals need to be removed from the population at the end of the outbreak to minimize trade impacts. We have shown that selective, targeted vaccination strategies could achieve effective FMD control while significantly reducing the number of animals vaccinated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sharon Roche
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Andrew C Breed
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Shuang Liu
- CSIRO Land & Water, Acton, ACT, Australia
| | - Corissa Miller
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Richard Bradhurst
- Centre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sam Hamilton
- Epidemiology and One Health Section, Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hasahya E, Thakur KK, Dione MM, Wieland B, Oba P, Kungu J, Lee HS. Modeling the Spread of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Among Pig Farms in Lira District of Northern Uganda. Front Vet Sci 2021; 8:727895. [PMID: 34527717 PMCID: PMC8435599 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.727895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS) is a viral swine disease that causes reproductive failure in breeding sows and respiratory distress in growing pigs. The main objectives were to simulate the transmission patterns of PRRS in Uganda using North American Animal Disease Spread Model (NAADSM) and to evaluate the potential effect of prevention and control options such as vaccination and movement control. The median number of infectious farms at the end of 52 weeks for the baseline scenario was 735 (36.75% of the 2,000 farms). The best effects of vaccination were observed in scenarios 60% farm coverage and 80% farm coverage, which resulted in 82 and 98.2% reduction in the median number of infectious farms at the end of the simulation, respectively. Vaccination of all medium and large farms only (33% of the farms) resulted in a 71.2% decrease in the median number of infectious farms at the end of 52 weeks. Movement control (MC) results showed that the median number of infectious farms at the end of 52 weeks decreased by 21.6, 52.3, 79.4, and 92.4% for scenarios MC 20, MC 40, MC 60, and MC 80%, respectively. This study provides new insights to the government of Uganda on how PRRS can be controlled. The large and medium farms need to be prioritized for vaccination, which would be a feasible and effective way to limit the spread of PRRS in Uganda. Scavenging pigs should be confined at all times, whether in the presence or absence of any disease outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanuel Hasahya
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Kampala, Uganda
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Krishna K. Thakur
- Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, Canada
| | - Michel M. Dione
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Dakar, Senegal
| | - Barbara Wieland
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Peter Oba
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Joseph Kungu
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity (COVAB), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Hu Suk Lee
- International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Hanoi, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colomer MA, Margalida A, Fraile L. Vaccination Is a Suitable Tool in the Control of Aujeszky's Disease Outbreaks in Pigs Using a Population Dynamics P Systems Model. Animals (Basel) 2020; 10:ani10050909. [PMID: 32456342 PMCID: PMC7278389 DOI: 10.3390/ani10050909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Maximizing the efficiency of pork production in line with sustainability and environmental restrictions presents a challenge for the pig industry in the coming years. It is necessary to develop practices based on cost/benefit analyses of the effects of disease on animal performance. Diseases can be controlled in various ways, such as vaccination programs and management protocols, among others, to control pathogens. We have developed a model to disentangle the effects of management and vaccination strategies to control one of the most important pig viral diseases, Aujeszky disease. Our results suggest that after confirming the diagnosis, early vaccination of most of the population is critical to decrease the spread of the virus and minimize its impact on pig productivity. However, the effect of management is negligible for the control of this virus. Thus, this model can be used to evaluate preventive medicine programs in the control of known diseases and for new ones that could appear in the future. Abstract Aujeszky’s disease is one of the main pig viral diseases and results in considerable economic losses in the pork production industry. The disease can be controlled using preventive measures such as improved stock management and vaccination throughout the pig-rearing period. We developed a stochastic model based on Population Dynamics P systems (PDP) models for a standard pig production system to differentiate between the effects of pig farm management regimes and vaccination strategies on the control of Aujeszky’s disease under several different epidemiological scenarios. Our results suggest that after confirming the diagnosis, early vaccination of most of the population (>75%) is critical to decrease the spread of the virus and minimize its impact on pig productivity. The direct economic cost of an outbreak of Aujeszky’s disease can be extremely high on a previously uninfected farm (from 352–792 Euros/sow/year) and highlights the positive benefits of investing in vaccination measures to control infections. We demonstrate the usefulness of computational models as tools in the evaluation of preventive medicine programs aimed at limiting the impact of disease on animal production.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antoni Margalida
- Institute for Game and Wildlife Research, IREC. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad de Castilla la Mancha-Junta de Comunidad de Castilla la Mancha (CSIC-UCLM-JCCM), 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain;
| | - Lorenzo Fraile
- Department of Animal Science, ETSEA, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
- Agrotecnio, University of Lleida, 25198 Lleida, Spain
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-973-70-28-14
| |
Collapse
|