1
|
De B, Dogra P, Zaid M, Elganainy D, Sun K, Amer AM, Wang C, Rooney MK, Chang E, Kang HC, Wang Z, Bhosale P, Odisio BC, Newhook TE, Tzeng CWD, Cao HST, Chun YS, Vauthey JN, Lee SS, Kaseb A, Raghav K, Javle M, Minsky BD, Noticewala SS, Holliday EB, Smith GL, Koong AC, Das P, Cristini V, Ludmir EB, Koay EJ. Measurable imaging-based changes in enhancement of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after radiotherapy reflect physical mechanisms of response. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2024:2024.09.11.24313334. [PMID: 39314943 PMCID: PMC11419200 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.11.24313334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Background Although escalated doses of radiation therapy (RT) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are associated with durable local control (LC) and prolonged survival, uncertainties persist regarding personalized RT based on biological factors. Compounding this knowledge gap, the assessment of RT response using traditional size-based criteria via computed tomography (CT) imaging correlates poorly with outcomes. We hypothesized that quantitative measures of enhancement would more accurately predict clinical outcomes than size-based assessment alone and developed a model to optimize RT. Methods Pre-RT and post-RT CT scans of 154 patients with iCCA were analyzed retrospectively for measurements of tumor dimensions (for RECIST) and viable tumor volume using quantitative European Association for Study of Liver (qEASL) measurements. Binary classification and survival analyses were performed to evaluate the ability of qEASL to predict treatment outcomes, and mathematical modeling was performed to identify the mechanistic determinants of treatment outcomes and to predict optimal RT protocols. Results Multivariable analysis accounting for traditional prognostic covariates revealed that percentage change in viable volume following RT was significantly associated with OS, outperforming stratification by RECIST. Binary classification identified ≥33% decrease in viable volume to optimally correspond to response to RT. The model-derived, patient-specific tumor enhancement growth rate emerged as the dominant mechanistic determinant of treatment outcome and yielded high accuracy of patient stratification (80.5%), strongly correlating with the qEASL-based classifier. Conclusion Following RT for iCCA, changes in viable volume outperformed radiographic size-based assessment using RECIST for OS prediction. CT-derived tumor-specific mathematical parameters may help optimize RT for resistant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prashant Dogra
- Mathematics in Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mohamed Zaid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Dalia Elganainy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kevin Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed M. Amer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K. Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Enoch Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hyunseon C. Kang
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zhihui Wang
- Mathematics in Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Neal Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruno C. Odisio
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E. Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S. Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun S. Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicholas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sunyoung S. Lee
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed Kaseb
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sonal S. Noticewala
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma B. Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vittorio Cristini
- Mathematics in Medicine Program, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Neal Cancer Center, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B. Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li L, Tian S, Han X, Tian J, Zhang C. Computed tomography-guided radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for liver malignancies in challenging locations. J Cancer Res Ther 2024; 20:1165-1172. [PMID: 39206978 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2638_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
AIMS This study aimed to retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of radioactive iodine-125 (I-125) seed implantation for liver malignancies in challenging locations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between December 2015 and December 2021, 49 patients with 60 liver malignancies in challenging locations who underwent computed tomography (CT)-guided I-125 seed implantation were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints included technical success rate and overall survival (OS), whereas the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and liver recurrence. Potential factors associated with liver recurrence were also evaluated. RESULTS The technical success rate was 100%. The median follow-up duration was 12 months (range, 2-68 months). The mean OS and PFS were 17.58 months (95% CI: 13.64-21.52 months) and 13.14 months (95% CI: 10.36-15.92 months), respectively. The 2-month, 6-month, and 1-year DCR and ORR were 97.96% and 93.88%, 93.75% and 77.08%, and 93.48% and 60.87%, respectively. The 6- and 12-month tumor recurrence rates were 20.41% and 28.26%, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the time of liver recurrence, with our results showing that patients with primary intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma had an increased likelihood of having earlier liver recurrence. No major complications developed during follow-up. CONCLUSION CT-guided radioactive I-125 implantation could be a safe and effective alternative with promising survival benefits and high local control rates for liver malignancies in challenging locations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Li
- Department of Operating Room, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
- Interventional Oncology Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Shuhui Tian
- Department of Interventional and Minimally Invasive Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xujian Han
- Interventional Oncology Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Jing Tian
- Department of Interventional and Minimally Invasive Oncology, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Cunjing Zhang
- Interventional Oncology Institute, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- Dean Office, Jinan Vocational College of Nursing, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yankey H, Ruth KJ, Dotan E, Reddy S, Meyer JE. Survival and Toxicity in Patients With Unresectable or Inoperable Biliary Tract Cancers With Ablative Radiation Therapy Versus Nonablative Chemoradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101412. [PMID: 38778829 PMCID: PMC11110027 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Conventional chemoradiation (CCRT) is inadequately effective for the treatment of unresectable or inoperable biliary tract cancers (UIBC). Ablative radiation therapy (AR), typically defined as a biologically effective dose (BED) ≥80.5 Gy, has shown some promise in terms of local control and survival in these patients. We compare the efficacy and toxicity of AR to non-AR in UIBC patients. Methods and Materials Patients with UIBC treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT; n = 18) or CCRT (n = 28) between 2006 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The associations of treatment, BED groups, selected characteristics with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control were estimated separately using Cox proportional hazards regression. Toxicity was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Results Median dose fractionation was 60 Gy in 5 fractions (median BED, 127 Gy) for SBRT and 50 Gy in 25 fractions (median BED, 64 Gy) for CCRT. The median follow-up of the entire cohort was 11.5 months. The 1-year OS rate was 62% for BED <80.5 versus 66% for BED ≥80.5 (P = .069). The 1-year PFS rate was 24% for BED <80.5 and 29% for BED ≥80.5 (P = .050). The 1-year local control rate was 20% for BED <80.5 and 41% for BED ≥80.5 (P = .097). BED as a continuous variable (P = .013), BED ≥100 Gy (P = .044), and race (white versus nonwhite) (P = .037) were associated with improved overall mortality. BED ≥80.5 Gy (P = .046), smaller tumor size (<5 cm; P = .038) and N0 disease (P <.0001) were associated with improved disease progression rates. Local control was improved in patients with N0 disease compared with N1 disease (P <.0001). Both treatments were well tolerated; there was no difference in acute and late toxicity between AR and non-AR. Conclusions In this review, there was improved PFS with BED ≥80.5 Gy with a trend toward OS benefit. BED ≥80.5 Gy was achieved mostly through SBRT and was well tolerated. AR could be considered a more effective treatment modality than CCRT in patients with UIBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilario Yankey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Karen J. Ruth
- Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sanjay Reddy
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua E. Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Masoud SJ, Rhodin KE, Kanu E, Bao J, Eckhoff AM, Bartholomew AJ, Howell TC, Aykut B, Kosovec JE, Palta M, Befera NT, Kim CY, Herbert G, Shah KN, Nussbaum DP, Blazer DG, Zani S, Allen PJ, Lidsky ME. Comparing Survival After Resection, Ablation, and Radiation in Small Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6639-6646. [PMID: 37436606 PMCID: PMC10529950 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13872-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatectomy is the cornerstone of curative-intent treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, in patients unable to be resected, data comparing efficacy of alternatives including thermal ablation and radiation therapy (RT) remain limited. Herein, we compared survival between resection and other liver-directed therapies for small ICC within a national cancer registry. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with clinical stage I-III ICC < 3 cm diagnosed 2010-2018 who underwent resection, ablation, or RT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods. RESULTS Of 545 patients, 297 (54.5%) underwent resection, 114 (20.9%) ablation, and 134 (24.6%) RT. Median OS was similar between resection and ablation [50.5 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 37.5-73.9; 39.5 months, 95% CI 28.7-58.4, p = 0.14], both exceeding that of RT (20.9 months, 95% CI 14.1-28.3). RT patients had high rates of stage III disease (10.4% RT vs. 1.8% ablation vs. 11.8% resection, p < 0.001), but the lowest rates of chemotherapy utilization (9.0% RT vs. 15.8% ablation vs. 38.7% resection, p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, resection and ablation were associated with reduced mortality compared with RT [hazard ratio (HR) 0.44, 95% CI 0.33-0.58 and HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.38-0.75, p < 0.001, respectively]. CONCLUSION Resection and ablation were associated with improved survival in patients with ICC < 3 cm compared with RT. Acknowledging confounders, anatomic constraints of ablation, limitations of available data, and need for prospective study, these results favor ablation in small ICC where resection is not feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabran J Masoud
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Kristen E Rhodin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elishama Kanu
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Austin M Eckhoff
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Thomas C Howell
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Berk Aykut
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Juliann E Kosovec
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Charles Y Kim
- Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Garth Herbert
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kevin N Shah
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel P Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Dan G Blazer
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Sabino Zani
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Peter J Allen
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael E Lidsky
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
De B, Upadhyay R, Liao K, Kumala T, Shi C, Dodoo G, Abi Jaoude J, Corrigan KL, Manzar GS, Marqueen KE, Bernard V, Lee SS, Raghav KPS, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD, Tran Cao HS, Lee G, Wo JY, Hong TS, Crane CH, Minsky BD, Smith GL, Holliday EB, Taniguchi CM, Koong AC, Das P, Javle M, Ludmir EB, Koay EJ. Definitive Liver Radiotherapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma with Extrahepatic Metastases. Liver Cancer 2023; 12:198-208. [PMID: 37593365 PMCID: PMC10427952 DOI: 10.1159/000530134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Tumor-related liver failure (TRLF) is the most common cause of death in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Though we previously showed that liver radiotherapy (L-RT) for locally advanced ICC is associated with less frequent TRLF and longer overall survival (OS), the role of L-RT for patients with extrahepatic metastatic disease (M1) remains undefined. We sought to compare outcomes for M1 ICC patients treated with and without L-RT. Methods We reviewed ICC patients that found to have M1 disease at initial diagnosis at a single institution between 2010 and 2021 who received L-RT, matching them with an institutional cohort by propensity score and a National Cancer Database (NCDB) cohort by frequency technique. The median biologically effective dose was 97.5 Gy (interquartile range 80.5-97.9 Gy) for L-RT. Patients treated with other local therapies or supportive care alone were excluded. We analyzed survival with Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results We identified 61 patients who received L-RT and 220 who received chemotherapy alone. At median follow-up of 11 months after diagnosis, median OS was 9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 8-11) and 21 months (CI: 17-26) for patients receiving chemotherapy alone and L-RT, respectively. TRLF was the cause of death more often in the patients who received chemotherapy alone compared to those who received L-RT (82% vs. 47%; p = 0.001). On multivariable propensity score-matched analysis, associations with lower risk of death included duration of upfront chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82; p = 0.005) and receipt of L-RT (HR: 0.40; p = 0.002). The median OS from diagnosis for NCDB chemotherapy alone cohort was shorter than that of the institutional L-RT cohort (9 vs. 22 months; p < 0.001). Conclusion For M1 ICC, L-RT associated with a lower rate of death due to TRLF and longer OS versus those treated with chemotherapy alone. Prospective studies of L-RT in this setting are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kaiping Liao
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tiffany Kumala
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher Shi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace Dodoo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Joseph Abi Jaoude
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kelsey L Corrigan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gohar S Manzar
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kathryn E Marqueen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vincent Bernard
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sunyoung S Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kanwal P S Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer Y Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan B Ludmir
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iezzi R, Gangi A, Posa A, Pua U, Liang P, Santos E, Kurup AN, Tanzilli A, Tenore L, De Leoni D, Filippiadis D, Giuliante F, Valentini V, Gasbarrini A, Goldberg SN, Meijerink M, Manfredi R, Kelekis A, Colosimo C, Madoff DC. Emerging Indications for Interventional Oncology: Expert Discussion on New Locoregional Treatments. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:308. [PMID: 36612304 PMCID: PMC9818393 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2022] [Revised: 12/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Interventional oncology (IO) employs image-guided techniques to perform minimally invasive procedures, providing lower-risk alternatives to many traditional medical and surgical therapies for cancer patients. Since its advent, due to rapidly evolving research development, its role has expanded to encompass the diagnosis and treatment of diseases across multiple body systems. In detail, interventional oncology is expanding its role across a wide spectrum of disease sites, offering a potential cure, control, or palliative care for many types of cancer patients. Due to its widespread use, a comprehensive review of the new indications for locoregional procedures is mandatory. This article summarizes the expert discussion and report from the "MIOLive Meet SIO" (Society of Interventional Oncology) session during the last MIOLive 2022 (Mediterranean Interventional Oncology Live) congress held in Rome, Italy, integrating evidence-reported literature and experience-based perceptions. The aim of this paper is to provide an updated review of the new techniques and devices available for innovative indications not only to residents and fellows but also to colleagues approaching locoregional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Iezzi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Afshin Gangi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, 67091 Strasbourg, France
| | - Alessandro Posa
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Uei Pua
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| | - Ping Liang
- Department of Interventional Ultrasound, PLA Medical College & Fifth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Ernesto Santos
- Department of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Anil N. Kurup
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Alessandro Tanzilli
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tenore
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Davide De Leoni
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Dimitrios Filippiadis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON” Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Str., 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Shraga N. Goldberg
- Division of Image-Guided Therapy, Department of Radiology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem 12000, Israel
| | - Martijn Meijerink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Riccardo Manfredi
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - Alexis Kelekis
- 2nd Department of Radiology, University General Hospital “ATTIKON” Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini Str., 12462 Athens, Greece
| | - Cesare Colosimo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncologic Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Roma, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy
| | - David C. Madoff
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, 330 Cedar St., TE-2, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Transarterial Infusion Chemotherapy with FOLFOX Could be an Effective and Safe Treatment for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:2724476. [PMID: 35342396 PMCID: PMC8941539 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2724476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Background Transarterial infusion (TAI) chemotherapy with the FOLFOX regimen has shown good efficacy and safety in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it has not been reported in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods The data of consecutive patients with unresectable ICC who underwent TAI with the FOLFOX regimen from November 2016 to September 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment effectiveness and safety were evaluated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier method, log-rank test, Cox regression models, and χ2 test. Results Twenty-nine patients were included in the study. The median overall survival (OS) was 16.2 months (95% CI, 13.0–19.4). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.7 months (95% CI, 6.2–11.1). Twenty-seven patients were included in the efficacy analysis. There were 0, 10, 13, and 4 patients with CR, PR, SD, and PD, respectively, based on mRECIST criteria. The ORR was 37.0%, and the DCR was 85.2%. There were 27 patients (93.1%) who experienced grade 1-2 AEs, while only 1 patient experienced grade 3 AEs. Conclusion TAI with the FOLFOX regimen could be an effective and safe treatment for unresectable ICC.
Collapse
|
8
|
De B, Abu-Gheida I, Patel A, Ng SSW, Zaid M, Thunshelle CP, Elganainy D, Corrigan KL, Rooney MK, Javle M, Raghav K, Lee SS, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD, Tran Cao HS, Ludmir EB, Minsky BD, Smith GL, Holliday EB, Taniguchi CM, Koong AC, Das P, Koay EJ. Benchmarking Outcomes after Ablative Radiotherapy for Molecularly Characterized Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. J Pers Med 2021; 11:1270. [PMID: 34945742 PMCID: PMC8703854 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11121270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
We have previously shown that ablative radiotherapy (A-RT) with a biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 80.5 Gy for patients with unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is associated with longer survival. Despite recent large-scale sequencing efforts in ICC, outcomes following RT based on genetic alterations have not been described. We reviewed records of 156 consecutive patients treated with A-RT for unresectable ICC from 2008 to 2020. For 114 patients (73%), next-generation sequencing provided molecular profiles. The overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine the associations with the outcomes. The median tumor size was 7.3 (range: 2.2-18.2) cm. The portal vein thrombus (PVT) was present in 10%. The RT median BED10 was 98 Gy (range: 81-144 Gy). The median (95% confidence interval) follow-up was 58 (42-104) months from diagnosis and 39 (33-74) months from RT. The median OS was 32 (29-35) months after diagnosis and 20 (16-24) months after RT. The one-year OS, LC, and intrahepatic DMFS were 73% (65-80%), 81% (73-87%), and 34% (26-42%). The most common mutations were in IDH1 (25%), TP53 (22%), ARID1A (19%), and FGFR2 (13%). Upon multivariable analysis, the factors associated with death included worse performance status, larger tumor, metastatic disease, higher CA 19-9, PVT, satellitosis, and IDH1 and PIK3CA mutations. TP53 mutation was associated with local failure. Further investigation into the prognostic value of individual mutations and combinations thereof is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Ibrahim Abu-Gheida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Aashini Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Sylvia S. W. Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Mohamed Zaid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Connor P. Thunshelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Dalia Elganainy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Kelsey L. Corrigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Michael K. Rooney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.J.); (K.R.); (S.S.L.)
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.J.); (K.R.); (S.S.L.)
| | - Sunyoung S. Lee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (M.J.); (K.R.); (S.S.L.)
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.-N.V.); (C.-W.D.T.); (H.S.T.C.)
| | - Ching-Wei D. Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.-N.V.); (C.-W.D.T.); (H.S.T.C.)
| | - Hop S. Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (J.-N.V.); (C.-W.D.T.); (H.S.T.C.)
| | - Ethan B. Ludmir
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Bruce D. Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Grace L. Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Emma B. Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Cullen M. Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Albert C. Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| | - Eugene J. Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (I.A.-G.); (A.P.); (S.S.W.N.); (M.Z.); (C.P.T.); (D.E.); (K.L.C.); (M.K.R.); (E.B.L.); (B.D.M.); (G.L.S.); (E.B.H.); (C.M.T.); (A.C.K.); (P.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inchingolo R, Acquafredda F, Ferraro V, Laera L, Surico G, Surgo A, Fiorentino A, Marini S, de'Angelis N, Memeo R, Spiliopoulos S. Non-surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1696-1708. [PMID: 34853644 PMCID: PMC8603446 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i11.1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer of the biliary confluence also known as hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) or Klatskin tumor, is a rare type of neoplastic disease constituting approximately 40%-60% of intrahepatic malignancies, and 2% of all cancers. The prognosis is extremely poor and the majority of Klatskin tumors are deemed unresectable upon diagnosis. Most patients with unresectable bile duct cancer die within the first year after diagnosis, due to hepatic failure, and/or infectious complications secondary to biliary obstruction. Curative treatments include surgical resection and liver transplantation in highly selected patients. Nevertheless, very few patients are eligible for surgery or transplant at the time of diagnosis. For patients with unresectable HC, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy, and liver-directed minimally invasive procedures such as percutaneous image-guided ablation and intra-arterial chemoembolization are recommended treatment options. This review focuses on currently available treatment options for unresectable HC and discusses future perspectives that could optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Acquafredda
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Valentina Ferraro
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Letizia Laera
- Department of Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Surico
- Department of Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Stefania Marini
- Department of Radiology, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva Delle Fonti 70021, Italy
| | - Stavros Spiliopoulos
- 2nd Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens 12461, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zori AG, Yang D, Draganov PV, Cabrera R. Advances in the management of cholangiocarcinoma. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1003-1018. [PMID: 34630871 PMCID: PMC8473501 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i9.1003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a primary malignancy of the bile ducts with three anatomically and molecularly distinct entities: Intrahepatic CCA (iCCA), perihilar CCA (pCCA), and distal CCA. As a result of phenotypic and anatomic differences they differ significantly with respect to management. For each type of CCA there have been significant changes in management over the last several years which will be discussed in this review. Although resection remains the standard of care for all types of CCA, liver transplantation has been established as curative treatment for selected patients with pCCA and is being evaluated for iCCA with early success. With respect to systemic therapy capecitabine is now first line adjuvant therapy for all biliary tract malignancies after curative intent resection. Progress in exploiting the pathologic mutations and molecular abnormalities has also yielded regulatory approval of targeted therapy for CCA in patients with acquired alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor. There is also increased consensus in managing malignant biliary obstruction associated with CCA where pre-operative biliary stenting is not beneficial while self-expanding metal stents have been shown to be superior to plastic stents in patients who are not surgical candidates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas G Zori
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| | - Dennis Yang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| | - Roniel Cabrera
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Massani M, Bonariol L, Stecca T. Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, a Comprehensive Review. J Clin Med 2021; 10:2552. [PMID: 34207700 PMCID: PMC8228250 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10122552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primitive liver cancer. Despite recent advances in the surgical management, the prognosis remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) has a median survival between 18 and 30 months, but if deemed unresectable it decreases to 6 months. Most patients have a liver-confined disease that is considered unresectable because of its localization, with infiltration of vascular structures or multifocality. The peculiar dual blood supply allows the delivery of high doses of chemotherapy via a surgically implanted subcutaneous pump, through the predominant arterial tumor vascularization, achieving much higher and more selective tumor drug levels than systemic administration. The results of the latest studies suggest that adequate and early treatment with the combination approach of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) and systemic (SYS) chemotherapy is associated with improved progression-free and overall survival than SYS or HAI alone for the treatment of unresectable iCCA. Current recommendations are limited by a lack of prospective trials. Individualization of chemotherapy and regimens based on selective targets in mutant iCCA are a focus for future research. In this paper we present a comprehensive review of the studies published to date and ongoing trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Massani
- HPB Hub Reference Center, First General Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Azienda ULSS2 Marca Trevigiana, 31100 Treviso, Italy; (L.B.); (T.S.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhao J, Chen Y, Wang J, Wang J, Wang Y, Chai S, Zhang Y, Chen X, Zhang W. Preoperative risk grade predicts the long-term prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Surg 2021; 21:113. [PMID: 33676467 PMCID: PMC7936481 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00954-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cumulating evidence indicates that the systemic inflammatory response (SIR) plays a crucial role in the prognosis of various cancers. We aimed to generate a preoperative risk grade (PRG) by integrating SIR markers to preoperatively predict the long-term prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). METHODS 468 consecutive ICC patients who underwent hepatectomy between 2010 and 2017 were enrolled. The PRG and a nomogram were generated and their predictive accuracy was evaluated. RESULTS The PRG consisted of two non-tumor-specific SIR markers platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and albumin (ALB), which were both the independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that the PRG was significantly associated with OS (PRG = 1: hazard ratio (HR) = 3.800, p < 0.001; PRG = 2: HR = 7.585, p < 0.001). The C-index of the PRG for predicting survival was 0.685 (95% CI 0.655 to 0.716), which was statistically higher than that of the following systems: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition (C-index 0.645), Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (LCSGJ) (C-index 0.644) and Okabayashi (C-index 0.633) (p < 0.05). Besides, the C-index of the nomogram only consisting of the tumor-specific factors (serum carcinoembryonic antigen, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, tumor number) could be improved to 0.737 (95% CI 0.062-0.768) from 0.625 (95% CI 0.585-0.665) when the PRG was incorporated (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The PRG integrating two non-tumor-specific SIR markers PLR and ALB was a novel method to preoperative predicting the prognosis of ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianping Zhao
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Yao Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Jingjing Wang
- Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Treatment Center, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Department of Pathology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Songshan Chai
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China
| | - Xiaoping Chen
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Leone V, Ali A, Weber A, Tschaharganeh DF, Heikenwalder M. Liver Inflammation and Hepatobiliary Cancers. Trends Cancer 2021; 7:606-623. [PMID: 33674229 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2020] [Revised: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Immune regulation has an important role in cancer development, particularly in organs with continuous exposure to environmental pathogens, such as the liver and gastrointestinal tract. Chronic liver inflammation can lead to the development of hepatobiliary cancers, namely hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), or combined HCC (cHCC)-CCA. In this review, we discuss the link between oxidative stress and the hepatic immune compartments, as well as how these factors trigger hepatocyte damage, proliferation, and eventually cancer initiation and its sustainment. We further give an overview of new anticancer therapies based on immunomodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Leone
- Division of Chronic Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Research Unit Radiation Cytogenetics, Helmholtz Zentrum München Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), 85764 Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Adnan Ali
- Division of Chronic Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Weber
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Molecular Cancer Research (IMCR), University Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Darjus Felix Tschaharganeh
- Helmholtz-University Group Cell Plasticity and Epigenetic Remodeling, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and Institute of Pathology University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mathias Heikenwalder
- Division of Chronic Inflammation and Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kawasaki H, Akazawa Y, Razumilava N. Progress toward improving outcomes in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 19:153-168. [PMID: 33883870 PMCID: PMC8054970 DOI: 10.1007/s11938-021-00333-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of review: To provide an update on latest advances in treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Recent findings: Incidence of cholangiocarcinoma has been increasing over the past decade. A better understanding of the genetic landscape of cholangiocarcinoma and its risk factors resulted in earlier diagnosis and treatment option expansion to targeted therapy with FGFR inhibitors, and liver transplantation for early perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and early intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. IDH1/2 inhibition for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an emerging targeted therapy approach. Data supports benefits of adjuvant therapy for a subset of patients undergoing surgical resection. Approaches combining different treatment modalities such as chemotherapy, surgery, radiation therapy appear promising. Summary: Earlier diagnosis and genetic characterization provided additional treatment options for patients with previously incurable cholangiocarcinoma. A precision medicine approach with a focus on actionable genetic alterations and combination of treatment modalities are actively being explored and will further improve outcomes in our patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroko Kawasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yuko Akazawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Saleh M, Virarkar M, Bura V, Valenzuela R, Javadi S, Szklaruk J, Bhosale P. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: pathogenesis, current staging, and radiological findings. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3662-3680. [PMID: 32417933 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02559-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
To this date, it is a major oncological challenge to optimally diagnose, stage, and manage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Imaging can not only diagnose and stage ICC, but it can also guide management. Hence, imaging is indispensable in the management of ICC. In this article, we review the pathology, epidemiology, genetics, clinical presentation, staging, pathology, radiology, and treatment of ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Saleh
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Mayur Virarkar
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Vlad Bura
- Department of Radiology, County Clinical Emergency Hospital, 400006, Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania
| | - Raul Valenzuela
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Sanaz Javadi
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Janio Szklaruk
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Beetz O, Weigle CA, Cammann S, Vondran FWR, Timrott K, Kulik U, Bektas H, Klempnauer J, Kleine M, Oldhafer F. Preoperative leukocytosis and the resection severity index are independent risk factors for survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:977-988. [PMID: 32815017 PMCID: PMC7541380 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01962-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is increasing worldwide. Despite advances in surgical and non-surgical treatment, reported outcomes are still poor and surgical resection remains to be the only chance for long-term survival of affected patients. The identification and validation of prognostic factors and scores, such as the recently introduced resection severity index, for postoperative morbidity and mortality are essential to facilitate optimal therapeutic regimens. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of 269 patients undergoing resection of histologically confirmed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between February 1996 and September 2018 at a tertiary referral center for hepatobiliary surgery. Regression analyses were performed to evaluate potential prognostic factors, including the resection severity index. RESULTS Median postoperative follow-up time was 22.93 (0.10-234.39) months. Severe postoperative complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo grade III) were observed in 94 (34.9%) patients. The body mass index (p = 0.035), the resection severity index (ASAT in U/l divided by Quick in % multiplied by the extent of liver resection graded in points; p = 0.006), additional hilar bile duct resection (p = 0.005), and number of packed red blood cells transfused during operation (p = 0.036) were independent risk factors for the onset of severe postoperative complications. Median Kaplan-Meier survival after resection was 27.63 months. Preoperative leukocytosis (p = 0.003), the resection severity index (p = 0.005), multivisceral resection (p = 0.001), and T stage ≥ 3 (p = 0.013) were identified as independent risk factors for survival. CONCLUSION Preoperative leukocytosis and the resection severity index are useful variables for preoperative risk stratification since they were identified as significant predictors for postoperative morbidity and mortality, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Beetz
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Clara A Weigle
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sebastian Cammann
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Florian W R Vondran
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Kai Timrott
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ulf Kulik
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Hüseyin Bektas
- Department of General, Visceral and Oncological Surgery, Hospital Group Gesundheit Nord, Bremen, Germany
| | - Jürgen Klempnauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Moritz Kleine
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Felix Oldhafer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Barry A, Apisarnthanarax S, O'Kane GM, Sapisochin G, Beecroft R, Salem R, Yoon SM, Lim YS, Bridgewater J, Davidson B, Scorsetti M, Solbiati L, Diehl A, Schuffenegger PM, Sham JG, Cavallucci D, Galvin Z, Dawson LA, Hawkins MA. Management of primary hepatic malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic: recommendations for risk mitigation from a multidisciplinary perspective. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 5:765-775. [PMID: 32511951 PMCID: PMC7274990 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(20)30182-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Around the world, recommendations for cancer treatment are being adapted in real time in response to the pandemic of COVID-19. We, as a multidisciplinary team, reviewed the standard management options, according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification system, for hepatocellular carcinoma. We propose treatment recommendations related to COVID-19 for the different stages of hepatocellular carcinoma (ie, 0, A, B, and C), specifically in relation to surgery, locoregional therapies, and systemic therapy. We suggest potential strategies to modify risk during the pandemic and aid multidisciplinary treatment decision making. We also review the multidisciplinary management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma as a potentially curable and incurable diagnosis in the setting of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aisling Barry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Smith Apisarnthanarax
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Grainne M O'Kane
- Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, and Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Robert Beecroft
- Department of Medical Imaging, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sang Min Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Young-Suk Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Brian Davidson
- Department of Surgical Biotechnology, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Solbiati
- Radiology Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | - Adam Diehl
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pablo Munoz Schuffenegger
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Hematology Oncology, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jonathan G Sham
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - David Cavallucci
- Department of Surgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Zita Galvin
- Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Transarterial chemoembolization versus percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for recurrent unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Development of a prognostic nomogram. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2020; 19:138-146. [PMID: 32139295 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) are commonly used to treat intrahepatic recurrent liver cancers. However, there is no information regarding their effectiveness in patients with recurrent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after resection. METHODS A total of 275 patients with localized recurrent ICC who received either TACE (n = 183) or PMCT (n = 92) were studied. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to compare prognostic impact of TACE and PMCT. Prognostic factors for TACE and PMCT were identified respectively. Predictive nomograms for each TACE and PMCT were developed using the Cox independent prognostic factors and were validated in independent patient groups by receiver operating characteristic curves and area under curve values. RESULTS Both TACE and PMCT provided curativeness in partial patients (5-year overall survival: 21.4% and 6.1%, respectively), but TACE provided better survival benefit in both overall patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-0.97; P = 0.034) and propensity score matching analysis (HR = 0.69; 95% CI: 0.47-0.98; P = 0.041). Independent prognostic factors for TACE were tumor size >5 cm, poor differentiation, and major resection, whereas poor differentiation, hepatitis B virus infection, cholelithiasis, and lymph node metastasis were identified for PMCT. Both predictive nomograms for TACE and PMCT were validated to be effective with area under curve values of 0.77 and 0.70, respectively. CONCLUSIONS TACE provided better survival benefits compared to PMCT. However, there was a disparity in prognostic factors, suggesting evaluation of the two nomograms may be supportive in modality selection. Further prospective validation studies are required for the results to be applied in clinical medicine.
Collapse
|
19
|
Avila S, Smani DA, Koay EJ. Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced unresectable intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Chin Clin Oncol 2020; 9:10. [PMID: 32008331 PMCID: PMC7277074 DOI: 10.21037/cco.2019.12.05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) remain challenging diseases to treat. The majority of patients present with advanced disease, and the tumors often cause life-threatening biliary obstruction and vascular compromise of the liver. Local control (LC) of these tumors has the potential to prolong life for patients. While escalated-dose radiation therapy (EDRT) has been demonstrated to be an effective, safe option to achieve LC of IHCC, data for EHCC suggest that EDRT with current techniques has limitations, often due to dose-limiting bowel structures in close proximity to the extrahepatic biliary system. Here we review the results of EDRT for IHCC and EHCC and point to potential directions to combine radiotherapy with novel agents. The molecular characterization of cholangiocarcinoma has particularly opened new avenues for clinical investigations of targeted therapies with EDRT and may point to ways to achieve both systemic and LC benefits for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santiago Avila
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Danyal A Smani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sebastian NT, Tan Y, Miller ED, Williams TM, Alexandra Diaz D. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is associated with improved overall survival compared to chemoradiation or radioembolization in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 19:66-71. [PMID: 31517072 PMCID: PMC6734105 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a highly lethal malignancy. For patients with locally advanced, unresectable disease, numerous liver-directed therapy options exist, including chemoradiation (CRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and transarterial radioembolization (TARE). There is no randomized data to inform clinicians regarding the optimal treatment modality. Method We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to study the overall survival (OS) of patients with ICC treated with CRT, SBRT, and TARE. We used Cox proportional hazards modeling and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to account for confounding variables. Results We identified 170 patients with unresected ICC treated with SBRT (n = 37), CRT (n = 61), or TARE (n = 72). SBRT was associated with higher OS compared to CRT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20-0.68; p = 0.001) and TARE (HR = 0.40; 95% CI 0.22-0.74; p = 0.003). On multivariable analysis, SBRT remained associated with higher OS compared to CRT (HR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.21-0.91; p = 0.028) and TARE (HR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.21-0.84; p = 0.014). After IPTW (Bonferroni-adjusted significance threshold, α = 0.017), SBRT again had a statistically significant association with higher OS compared to CRT (HR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.11-0.44; p < 0.0001) and was nominally associated TARE (HR = 0.58; 95% CI 0.37-0.91; p = 0.019). Conclusions We found SBRT is associated with higher OS when compared to CRT or TARE for the treatment of unresectable ICC. Due to the retrospective nature of the study and potential selection bias, these findings should be evaluated prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil T Sebastian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Yubo Tan
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 320 Lincoln Tower, 1800 Cannon Drive, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Terence M Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Dayssy Alexandra Diaz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W. 10 Ave, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhen Y, Liu B, Chang Z, Ren H, Liu Z, Zheng J. A pooled analysis of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Onco Targets Ther 2019; 12:4489-4498. [PMID: 31239717 PMCID: PMC6560193 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s202875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 04/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres for the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, SCI with the English language from inception to October 2018. A pooled analysis was conducted using Stata software. Results: There were 16 eligible studies included in this pooled analysis. The pooled median overall survival (OS) from 12 studies was 14.3 (95% CI: 11.9-17.1) months. Based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), no complete response was reported, and the median of partial response, stable disease and progressive disease were 11.5% (range: 4.8-35.3%), 61.5% (range: 42.9-81.3%) and 22.7% (range: 12.5-52.4%) respectively. The pooled disease control rate (DCR) from nine studies was 77.2% (95% CI: 70.2-84.2%). According to the type of microspheres, subgroup analysis was performed, the median OS in the glass microspheres group was 14.0 (95% CI: 9.1-21.4) months, and 14.3 (95% CI: 11.5-17.8) months in the resin microspheres group. The DCR was 77.3% (95% CI: 63.5-91.1%) and 77.4% (95% CI: 66.8-87.9%) in the glass and resin microspheres groups respectively. Most of the side effects reported in the included studies were mild and did not require intervention. Conclusion: TARE with 90Y microspheres is safe and effective for patients with unresectable ICC with acceptable side effects. And it seems that the type of microsphere has no influence on therapeutic efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanhua Zhen
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Bin Liu
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhihui Chang
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Haiyan Ren
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhaoyu Liu
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiahe Zheng
- Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Molkentine JM, Fujimoto TN, Horvath TD, Grossberg AJ, Garcia CJG, Deorukhkar A, de la Cruz Bonilla M, Lin D, Samuel ELG, Chan WK, Lorenzi PL, Piwnica-Worms H, Dantzer R, Tour JM, Mason KA, Taniguchi CM. Enteral Activation of WR-2721 Mediates Radioprotection and Improved Survival from Lethal Fractionated Radiation. Sci Rep 2019; 9:1949. [PMID: 30760738 PMCID: PMC6374382 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37147-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Unresectable pancreatic cancer is almost universally lethal because chemotherapy and radiation cannot completely stop the growth of the cancer. The major problem with using radiation to approximate surgery in unresectable disease is that the radiation dose required to ablate pancreatic cancer exceeds the tolerance of the nearby duodenum. WR-2721, also known as amifostine, is a well-known radioprotector, but has significant clinical toxicities when given systemically. WR-2721 is a prodrug and is converted to its active metabolite, WR-1065, by alkaline phosphatases in normal tissues. The small intestine is highly enriched in these activating enzymes, and thus we reasoned that oral administration of WR-2721 just before radiation would result in localized production of the radioprotective WR-1065 in the small intestine, providing protective benefits without the significant systemic side effects. Here, we show that oral WR-2721 is as effective as intraperitoneal WR-2721 in promoting survival of intestinal crypt clonogens after morbid irradiation. Furthermore, oral WR-2721 confers full radioprotection and survival after lethal upper abdominal irradiation of 12.5 Gy × 5 fractions (total of 62.5 Gy, EQD2 = 140.6 Gy). This radioprotection enables ablative radiation therapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer and nearly triples the median survival compared to controls. We find that the efficacy of oral WR-2721 stems from its selective accumulation in the intestine, but not in tumors or other normal tissues, as determined by in vivo mass spectrometry analysis. Thus, we demonstrate that oral WR-2721 is a well-tolerated, and quantitatively selective, radioprotector of the intestinal tract that is capable of enabling clinically relevant ablative doses of radiation to the upper abdomen without unacceptable gastrointestinal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica M Molkentine
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Tara N Fujimoto
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Thomas D Horvath
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Aaron J Grossberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
- Department of Symptoms Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Carolina J Garcia Garcia
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Amit Deorukhkar
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Marimar de la Cruz Bonilla
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Daniel Lin
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Errol L G Samuel
- Department of Chemistry, Smalley-Curl Institute and the NanoCarbon Center, and Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Wai Kin Chan
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Philip L Lorenzi
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Helen Piwnica-Worms
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Robert Dantzer
- Department of Symptoms Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - James M Tour
- Department of Chemistry, Smalley-Curl Institute and the NanoCarbon Center, and Department of Materials Science and NanoEngineering, Rice University, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kathryn A Mason
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77030, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Takahashi EA, Kinsman KA, Schmit GD, Atwell TD, Schmitz JJ, Welch BT, Callstrom MR, Geske JR, Kurup AN. Thermal ablation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Safety, efficacy, and factors affecting local tumor progression. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2018; 43:3487-3492. [PMID: 29869103 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1656-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and oncologic efficacy of percutaneous thermal ablation of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and identify risk factors for local tumor progression (LTP). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review of an institutional tumor ablation registry demonstrated that 20 patients (9 males, 11 females; mean age 62.5 ± 15.8 years) with 50 ICCs (mean size 1.8 ± 1.3 cm) were treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA) between 2006 and 2015. Thirty-eight of the treated ICCs (76%) were metastases that developed after surgical resection of the primary tumor. Patient demographics, procedure technical parameters, and clinical outcomes were reviewed. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the risk of LTP by ablation modality. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Mean imaging follow-up time was 41.5 ± 42.7 months. Forty-four (88%) ICCs were treated with RFA, and 6 (12%) with MWA. Eleven (22%) cases of LTP developed in 5 (25%) patients. The median time to LTP among these 11 tumors was 7.1 months (range, 2.3-22.9 months). Risk of LTP was not significantly different for ICCs treated with MWA compared to RFA (HR 2.72; 95% CI 0.58-12.84; p = 03.21). Median disease-free survival was 8.2 months (1.1-70.4 months), and median overall survival was 23.6 months (7.4-122.5 months). No major complication occurred. CONCLUSIONS Percutaneous thermal ablation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with ICCs and may be particularly valuable in unresectable patients, or those who have already undergone hepatic surgery. Tumor size and ablation modality were not associated with LTP, whereas primary tumors and superficially located tumors were more likely to subsequently recur.
Collapse
|
24
|
Lin JZ, Bai Y, Wang AQ, Long JY, Xu WY, Hu K, Zhao L, Pan J, Sang XT, Zhao HT. Multidisciplinary management of hepatobiliary tumors in the era of precision medicine. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2018; 17:381-382. [PMID: 30082196 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Zhen Lin
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Yi Bai
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - An-Qiang Wang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jun-Yu Long
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Wei-Yu Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Center of Radiotherapy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Lin Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jie Pan
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xin-Ting Sang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Hai-Tao Zhao
- Department of Liver Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kolarich AR, Shah JL, George TJ, Hughes SJ, Shaw CM, Geller BS, Grajo JR. Non-surgical management of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States, 2004-2015: an NCDB analysis. J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 9:536-545. [PMID: 29998019 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2018.02.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical resection is the standard of care for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but only a minority of patients are managed surgically. Other modalities, including external beam radiation (XRT), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and radioactive implants (RIs) have been employed with significant heterogeneity of prognosis reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics of patients with ICC managed non-surgically and compare prognosis in patients managed surgically to those that underwent XRT, RFA, or RI. Methods All patients diagnosed with ICC from 2004 to 2015 in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) were reviewed. Patient demographics, treatments, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results Of the 6,140 patients with ICC, 4,374 (71%) did not undergo surgery. Patients managed non-surgically were typically older, treated at community centers, more likely to have severe fibrosis or cirrhosis, and present with higher stage disease. The strongest association to receipt of XRT, RI, or RFA modalities was treatment at an academic center. Increased clinical stage was associated with decreased use of RFA; a significantly higher proportion of patients with stage IV disease were given no local therapy. RFA associated with a statistically significant survival benefit over no local therapy only in stage I disease (2.1 vs. 0.7 years, P=0.012) as well as XRT over no local therapy (1.7 vs. 0.7 years, P=0.009). No survival benefit was realized for any treatment in stage II disease. Patients with stage III disease had a survival benefit from XRT versus no local therapy (0.9 vs. 0.6 years, P=0.029) and RI over no local therapy (1.2 vs. 0.6 years, P=0.013). Patients with stage IV disease only demonstrated survival benefit from RI over no local therapy (0.9 vs. 0.3 years, P=0.014). Conclusions The majority of patients with ICC in the United States continue to be managed non-surgically. RFA was associated with improved survival only in stage I disease. XRT was associated with improved survival in stage I & III disease, while RI was associated with improved survival in stage III and IV disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jehan L Shah
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Thomas J George
- Department of Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Steven J Hughes
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christiana M Shaw
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Brian S Geller
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Joseph R Grajo
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|