Immunotherapy in patients with autoimmune disease

The Role of TNF-α in Neuropathic Pain: An Immunotherapeutic Perspective

TNF-α is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays a pivotal role in the regulation of immune responses. It is predominantly produced by activated macrophages, although other cell types, such as T lymphocytes and NK cells, also contribute to its secretion. TNF-α participates in various physiological processes, including cell proliferation and differentiation. Moreover, TNF-α has been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Recent studies have highlighted the important role of TNF-α in neuropathic pain, a complex and frequently disabling condition caused by nerve injury or dysfunction. Increased TNF-α levels in the nervous system have been associated with the onset of neuropathic pain, contributing to neuronal sensitization and alterations in pain signaling pathways. This study supports the idea that TNF-α connects the immune system with the nervous system, thereby supporting our understanding of the neuroimmune interface of pain and bringing a potential treatment against neuropathic pain: targeting TNF-α. Anti-TNF-α antibody administration reduces pain behaviors and neuroinflammation in preclinical animal models. Simultaneously, clinical trials are evaluating the safety and efficacy of anti-TNF-α treatments, with preliminary results indicating promising outcomes in patients experiencing neuropathic pain. Here, targeting TNF-α goes beyond its conventional spectrum of inflammatory pathologies and initiates a new mechanism-based approach to defining neuropathic pain, thereby improving the quality of life of the individuals affected and bringing together an area of colossal unmet clinical need.

Unmasking a Paradox: Roles of the PD-1/PD-L1 Axis in Alzheimer's Disease-Associated Neuroinflammation

Alzheimer's disease (AD) represents the most prevalent form of dementia, characterized by progressive cognitive impairment and chronic neuroinflammation. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-programmed cell death (PD)-1 and anti-PD-L1, signify a revolutionary advancement in cancer treatment by preventing T-cell exhaustion; however, their therapeutic application in AD presents a conundrum. Hypothesis: Recent preclinical studies indicate that PD-1 inhibition in AD mouse models induces an interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-mediated response, leading to increased recruitment of monocyte-derived macrophages into the brain, enhanced clearance of amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques, and improved cognitive performance. Nonetheless, this therapeutic effect is counterbalanced by the potential for exacerbated neuroinflammation, as PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may potentiate pro-inflammatory T helper (Th)1 and Th17 responses. In this review, we critically discuss the pertinent pro-inflammatory and neuroprotective facets of T cell biology in the pathogenesis of AD, emphasizing the potential for modulation of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis to influence both Aβ clearance and the dynamics of neuroinflammatory processes. In summary, we determine that ICIs are promising tools for reducing AD pathology and improving cognition. However, it is essential to refine treatment protocols and carefully select patients to optimize neuroprotective effects while adequately considering inflammatory risks.

The Role of IL-23 in the Development of Inflammatory Diseases

Interleukin-23 is crucial in the initiation and progression of certain inflammatory disorders. As a key cytokine, IL-23 is involved in the differentiation and activation of Th17 cells, which play a role in a broad spectrum of inflammatory diseases. This review examines the molecular mechanisms through which IL-23 contributes to the pathogenesis of conditions including psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, and multiple sclerosis. By elucidating the significant role of IL-23 in inflammation, this review underscores its importance as a therapeutic target for managing inflammatory conditions, with particular emphasis on current and emerging biologic treatments.

Early-Stage Renal Cell Carcinoma: Who Needs Adjuvant Therapy?

Surgery is the oldest modality of kidney cancer therapy and is usually the first step in the treatment process. To improve surgical outcomes, adjuvant therapy is frequently administered to eliminate residual tumors and reduce the risk of recurrence and metastasis. However, not all patients require adjuvant treatment. The decision regarding whether to treat or not to treat renal cell carcinoma patients depends on the risk of recurrence, including tumor stage and histology, and clinical, biological, and personal risk factors. This article will address the challenges of treating renal cell carcinoma patients with adjuvant therapy and review the current evidence and ongoing clinical trials.

Psoriasis Risk With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Importance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recognized as revolutionary cancer therapies but have raised concerns about immune-related adverse events, including the development of autoimmune diseases.

Objective

To evaluate the psoriasis risk associated with the use of ICIs in patients with cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This nationwide cohort study with a target trial emulation design used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance database and the Taiwan Cancer Registry. The participants included were patients who received antineoplastic medications for cancer at stages III and IV between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021. Data were analyzed from May 2023 to July 2024.

Exposures

Patients treated with ICIs were classified as ICI users, while those who received chemotherapy or targeted therapies were categorized as non-ICI users.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was the incidence of psoriasis during the follow-up period. Stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to mitigate potential confounders. Cox and Fine-Gray hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for psoriasis risk between groups.

Results

Of 135 230 patients who received antineoplastic medications (mean [SD] age, 62.94 [13.01] years; 45.1% female), 3188 patients were eligible for the ICI user group, while 132 042 patients were eligible for the non-ICI user group. ICI users experienced a higher incidence of psoriasis at 5.76 cases per 1000 person-years, compared to 1.44 cases in the non-ICI group. After adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, ICI users were found to have a 2-fold increase in the risk of developing psoriasis (IPTW-adjusted HR, 3.31; IPTW-adjusted subdistribution HR, 2.43). Both as-started design and on-treatment design showed consistent findings, and the results were consistent and robust across all follow-up intervals and all sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, patients with cancer treated with ICIs faced an increased risk of psoriasis. Medical professionals should be aware of the potential adverse effects of immunotherapy to ensure optimal cancer care.

A comprehensive review of immune checkpoint inhibitors for cancer treatment

Immunology-based therapies are emerging as an effective cancer treatment, using the body's immune system to target tumors. Immune checkpoints, which regulate immune responses to prevent tissue damage and autoimmunity, are often exploited by cancer cells to avoid destruction. The discovery of checkpoint proteins like PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 was pivotal in developing cancer immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown great success, with FDA-approved drugs like PD-1 inhibitors (Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab, Cemiplimab), PD-L1 inhibitors (Atezolizumab, Durvalumab, Avelumab), and CTLA-4 inhibitors (Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab), alongside LAG-3 inhibitor Relatlimab. Research continues on new checkpoints like TIM-3, VISTA, B7-H3, BTLA, and TIGIT. Biomarkers like PDL-1 expression, tumor mutation burden, interferon-γ presence, microbiome composition, and extracellular matrix characteristics play a crucial role in predicting responses to immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Despite their effectiveness, not all patients experience the same level of benefit, and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs) such as rash or itching, colitis, diarrhea, hyperthyroidism, and hypothyroidism may occur. Given the rapid advancements in this field and the variability in patient outcomes, there is an urgent need for a comprehensive review that consolidates the latest findings on immune checkpoint inhibitors, covering their clinical status, biomarkers, resistance mechanisms, strategies to overcome resistance, and associated adverse effects. This review aims to fill this gap by providing an analysis of the current clinical status of ICIs, emerging biomarkers, mechanisms of resistance, strategies to enhance therapeutic efficacy, and assessment of adverse effects. This review is crucial to furthering our understanding of ICIs and optimizing their application in cancer therapy.

Regulatory T cell-based therapy in type 1 diabetes: Latest breakthroughs and evidence

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) are among the most significant health complications, with their incidence rising in recent years. Type 1 diabetes (T1D), an AD, targets the insulin-producing β cells in the pancreas, leading to chronic insulin deficiency in genetically susceptible individuals. Regulatory immune cells, particularly T-cells (Tregs), have been shown to play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of diabetes by modulating immune responses. In diabetic patients, Tregs often exhibit diminished effectiveness due to various factors, such as instability in forkhead box P3 (Foxp3) expression or abnormal production of the proinflammatory cytokine interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) by autoreactive T-cells. Consequently, Tregs represent a potential therapeutic target for diabetes treatment. Building on the successful clinical outcomes of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in cancer treatment, particularly in leukemias, the concept of designing and utilizing CAR Tregs for ADs has emerged. This review summarizes the findings on Treg targeting in T1D and discusses the benefits and limitations of this treatment approach for patients suffering from T1D.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and uncontrolled trials reporting on the use of checkpoint blockers in patients with cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disease

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease have been excluded from randomized trials of immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We conducted a systematic review of observational studies and uncontrolled trials including cancer patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease who received ICBs.

METHODS

We searched 5 electronic databases through November 2023. Study selection, data collection, and quality assessment were performed independently by 2 investigators. We performed a meta-analysis to pool incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), including de novo events and flares of existing autoimmune disease, hospitalizations due to irAEs, as well as deaths.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included (23,897 patients with cancer and preexisting autoimmune disease). The most common cancer evaluated was lung cancer (30.7 %) followed by skin cancer (15.7 %). Patients with autoimmune disease were more likely to report irAEs compared to patients without autoimmune disease (relative risk 1.3, 95 % CI 1.0 to 1.6). The pooled occurrence rate of any irAEs (flares or de novo) was 61 % (95 % CI 54 % to 68 %); that of flares was 36 % (95 % CI 30 % to 43 %), and that of de novo irAEs was 23 % (95 % CI 16 % to 30 %). Flares were mild (grade <3) in half of cases and more commonly reported in patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis (39 %), inflammatory bowel disease (37 %), and rheumatoid arthritis (36 %). 32 % of the patients with irAEs required hospitalization and treatment of irAEs included corticosteroids in 72 % of the cases. The irAEs mortality rate was 0.07 %. There were no statistically significant differences in cancer response to ICBs between patients with and without autoimmune disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although more patients with pre-existing autoimmune disease had irAEs, these were mild and managed with corticosteroids in most cases, with no impact on cancer response. These results suggest that ICBs can be used in these patients, but careful monitoring is required, as over a third of the patients will experience a flare of their autoimmune disease and/or require hospitalization. These findings provide a crucial foundation for oncologists to refine their monitoring and management strategies, ensuring that the benefits of ICB therapy are maximized while minimizing its risks.

A narrative review on perioperative systemic therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that is operable still carries a high risk of recurrence, approaching 50% of all operable cases despite adding adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the utilization of immunotherapy and targeted therapy moving beyond the metastatic NSCLC setting and into early-stage perioperative management has generated tremendous enthusiasm and has been practice-changing. Adjuvant atezolizumab in NSCLC first demonstrated a clinical benefit with an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Then, with studies studying a significant benefit in major pathologic response in surgical patients treated preoperatively with immunotherapy compared to only chemotherapy, neoadjuvant nivolumab and chemotherapy were evaluated and showed significant event-free survival benefit leading to subsequent studies evaluating perioperative immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Meanwhile, with regards to targeted therapies, adjuvant osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and adjuvant alectinib in ALK-rearranged NSCLC have both received regulatory approvals following demonstrated clinical benefit in clinical trials. With rapidly evolving changes in the field, new combinations such as multiple immunotherapy agents and antibody-drug conjugates in development, perioperative NSCLC management has quickly become complicated with different pathways to perioperative treatment. Furthermore, circulating tumor DNA and studies looking at better tools to prognosticate immunotherapy response will help with decision-making regarding which patients should receive immunotherapy and if so, either only pre-operatively or both pre- and post-operatively. In this review, we look at the evolution of systemic therapy in the perioperative setting from adjuvant chemotherapy to adjuvant immunotherapy to perioperative immunotherapy and look at perioperative targeted therapy while looking ahead to future considerations.

Prognostic and therapeutic insights into MIF, DDT, and CD74 in melanoma

Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor (MIF) and its homolog D-dopachrome Tautomerase (DDT) have been implicated as drivers of tumor progression across a variety of cancers. Recent evidence suggests MIF as a therapeutic target in immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) resistant melanomas, however clinical evidence of MIF and particularly of DDT remain limited. This retrospective study analyzed 97 patients treated at Yale for melanoma between 2002-2020. Bulk-RNA sequencing of patient tumor samples from the Skin Cancer SPORE Biorepository was used to evaluate for differential gene expression of MIF, DDT, CD74, and selected inflammatory markers, and gene expression was correlated with patient survival outcomes. Our findings revealed a strong correlation between MIF and DDT levels, with no statistically significant difference across common melanoma mutations and subtypes. Improved survival was associated with lower MIF and DDT levels and higher CD74:MIF and CD74:DDT levels. High CD74:DDT and CD74:MIF levels were also associated with enrichment of infiltrating inflammatory cell markers. These data suggest DDT as a novel target in immune therapy. Dual MIF and DDT blockade may provide synergistic responses in patients with melanoma, irrespective of common mutations, and may overcome ICI resistance. These markers may also provide prognostic value for further biomarker development.

Real-World Experience of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Older Patients with Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Older patients are often underrepresented in clinical trials owing to exclusionary comorbidities, which are more common with age. Chemotherapy is poorly tolerated in older comorbid advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) patients; however, little is known on the efficacy and tolerability of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in this population. To our knowledge, this is the largest dedicated report on a cohort of older patients with advanced CSCC treated with immunotherapy to date.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to report outcomes of ICI use in a real-world older cohort with advanced CSCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A single-centre retrospective audit of all patients treated via an access scheme providing ICIs to patients with advanced CSCC was conducted. Participants were ≥ 70 years of age and had advanced CSCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy. Best overall response rate (ORR), 12-month overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity rates were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients were analysed. The median age was 81.8 years (range 70.1-96.8); 81% were male; 34% were immunocompromised; and 34% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of ≥ 2. The ORR was 57%, and 12-month OS and PFS were 63% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44-78) and 41% (95% CI 25-57), respectively. Thirty-two per cent developed an immune-related adverse event (irAE), but only two patients experienced a grade 3 irAE, with no treatment-related deaths. Higher ECOG score was associated with worse OS and PFS. No significant association was identified for increasing age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, or immunocompromised status.

CONCLUSIONS

ICIs have demonstrated efficacy and have an acceptable safety profile among older patients with advanced CSCC, with comparable efficacy to what has been demonstrated in current clinical trials.

Comparative analysis of immunotherapy responses in small cell lung cancer patients with dermatomyositis

Cancer-associated dermatomyositis (CAD), a paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by dermatomyositis (DM), frequently presents in association with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Although the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer treatment, their efficacy and safety in patients with concurrent autoimmune diseases (AD) and malignancies remains uncertain. Several studies have suggested the safe administration of ICIs in patients with AD, indicating that successful cancer therapy can alleviate CAD symptoms. Conversely, other studies have raised concerns about the potential for ICIs to exacerbate AD flares or immune-related adverse events (irAEs). A comparative analysis of two cases from our institution emphasizes the variability in ICI responses among SCLC patients with CAD. One patient, previously reported as a case study, exhibited significant clinical improvement in DM symptoms after ICI administration, whereas the other developed severe exfoliative skin changes and experienced an unfavorable prognosis. This variability emphasizes the need for careful patient selection and close monitoring during ICI treatment. We hypothesized that overweight or obese individuals and those with severe initial skin lesions and elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels are more susceptible to developing irAEs following ICI therapy. Therefore, caution is advised when considering immunotherapy in these patients.

Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer Patients and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases (AID) have been traditionally excluded from clinical trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) due to concerns for toxicity. As indications for ICI expand, more data are needed on the safety and efficacy of ICI treatment in cancer patients with AID.

METHODS

We systematically searched for studies consisting of NSCLC, AID, ICI, treatment response, and adverse events. Outcomes of interest include incidence of autoimmune flare, irAE, response rate, and ICI discontinuation. Study data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Data were extracted from 24 cohort studies, consisting of 11,567 cancer patients (3774 NSCLC patients and 1157 with AID). Pooled analysis revealed an AID flare incidence of 36% (95% CI, 27%-46%) in all cancers and 23% (95% CI, 9%-40%) in NSCLC. Preexisting AID was associated with an increased risk of de novo irAE in all cancer patients (RR 1.38, 95% CI, 1.16-1.65) and NSCLC patients (RR 1.51, 95% CI, 1.12-2.03). There was no difference in de novo grade 3 to 4 irAE and tumor response between cancer patients with and without AID. However, in NSCLC patients, preexisting AID was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of de novo grade 3 to 4 irAE (RR 1.95, 95% CI, 1.01-3.75) but also better tumor response in achieving a complete or partial response (RR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.19-2.04).

CONCLUSIONS

NSCLC patients with AID are at a higher risk of grade 3 to 4 irAE but are more likely to achieve treatment response. Prospective studies focused on optimizing immunotherapeutic strategies are needed to improve outcomes for NSCLC patients with AID.

A Safety Analysis of Programmed Death 1 Pathway Inhibitors in Patients With Solid Tumor Malignancies and Preexisting Autoimmune Disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to characterize the safety of programmed death 1 inhibitors in patients with preexisting autoimmune disease.

METHODS

A medical records review study was conducted on adults with solid tumor malignancies who received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab or nivolumab at Emory Healthcare from September 4, 2014 until December 31, 2019. All autoimmune patients were included (n = 77), whereas the nonautoimmune patients were randomized and the first 156 patients were included in a 2:1 ratio to autoimmune patients. The primary objective was the comparison of incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) between patients with preexisting autoimmune disease and those without. Secondary objectives included irAE characterization, irAE treatment, and survival analyses.

RESULTS

Preexisting autoimmune disease was controlled in all of the autoimmune patients before immunotherapy initiation. The rate of irAE was 32.7% in the nonautoimmune group and 42.9% in the autoimmune group (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.14; p = 0.130). In the patient population diagnosed with a rheumatologic autoimmune disease, 23.81% of irAEs were considered to be a flare of their preexisting autoimmune disease. Less patients in the autoimmune group experienced a grade ≥3 irAE (21.21% vs 37.25%, p = 0.379) and received systemic corticosteroids (54.55% vs 67.35%, p = 0.241) for the treatment of the irAE.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that pembrolizumab and nivolumab can be safely administered in patients with controlled preexisting autoimmune diseases without a significant increase in irAE compared with patients without autoimmune diseases. Inclusion of patients with preexisting autoimmune diseases in prospective clinical trials is warranted.

Pre-Existing Autoimmune Disease and Mortality in Patients Treated with Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 Therapy

Although indications for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically increased in the past decade, ICIs have been associated with autoinflammatory immune-related adverse events, which can resemble autoimmune diseases (ADs). Little is known about the impact of baseline AD on mortality in cancer patients treated with ICIs. Here, we identified 17 497 patients with preexisting autoimmune diagnoses prior to treatment with antiprogrammed cell death receptor-1 or antiprogrammed cell death ligand-1 therapy and 17 497 matched controls through the TriNetX Diamond network of more than 200 million patients across the United States and Europe. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, we found that patients with history of AD were not at higher risk of mortality than non-AD patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1 to 1.07; P = .05). Additionally, history of Hashimoto disease (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.62 to 0.90; P = .002) and vitiligo (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.34 to 0.81; P = .003) were statistically significantly associated with decreased mortality. This suggests that underlying AD need not be a contraindication to inclusion in clinical trials and administration of ICI for treatment of cancer.

PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Patients With Preexisting Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune diseases and malignant tumors are the two hotspots and difficulties that are currently being studied and concerned by the medical field. The use of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors improves the prognosis of advanced tumors, but excessive immune responses can also induce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Due to this concern, many clinical trials exclude cancer patients with preexisting autoimmune disease (AID). This review outlines the possible mechanisms of irAE, discusses the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in cancer patients with preexisting AID, and emphasizes the importance of early recognition, continuous monitoring, and multidisciplinary cooperation in the prevention and management of cancer patients with preexisting AID.

Pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Impact of autoimmune comorbidity and outcomes following treatment completion

INTRODUCTION

Pembrolizumab, an immune-checkpoint inhibitor, is approved for first-line treatment of metastatic NSCLC in patients with tumours expressing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) with tumour proportion score (TPS) of ≥50%. We aimed to clarify some uncertainties regarding use of immunotherapy in patients with previous autoimmune (AI) disorders and assess real-world outcomes following treatment completion.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case record review of 82 patients with tumours expressing PD-L1 at TPS ≥ 50% and receiving first-line Pembrolizumab. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan Meier method.

RESULTS

After 36.93 months (IQR: 34.37-40.20) median follow-up, median OS was 13.6 months (95% CI 8.9-19.3). There were 10 patients (12%) with AI co-morbidities and there was a trend toward improved median OS for this group versus those without AI comorbidity, 42 months (14.87-NR) versus 10.7 months (7.3-17.8), p = 0.073. Sixteen patients (20%) with nonprogressive disease at 2 years had significantly better median OS compared to those who did not complete 2 years of treatment, NR (42- NR) and 8.7 (5.8-14.1), p < 0.001.Immune related adverse events (irAE) of any grade occurred in 90% of the AI cohort compared with 70.8% of patients without AI comorbidity. Low grade adrenal insufficiency was the only irAE which occurred at a significantly higher rate in the AI group, p = 0.02.

CONCLUSION

Patients with previous AI diseases tolerate treatment well, and there is a non-significant trend for improved outcomes in this group. Patients who complete the course of pembrolizumab have significantly better survival outcomes than those who do not.

Atezolizumab-Induced Hypothyroidism in a Patient With Pre-existing Triiodothyronine (T3) Thyrotoxicosis Due to Graves' Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved the management and prognosis of many solid tumors. Because of their mechanism of action, and as checks on the immune systems are reduced, immune-related adverse events are common, including the exacerbation of the pre-existing autoimmune disease. The literature is scanty regarding reports of the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing Graves' disease. We report a case of a woman with pre-existing triiodothyronine (T3) thyrotoxicosis (hyperthyroidism) secondary to Graves' disease, who developed thyroiditis followed by severe hypothyroidism after receiving an immune checkpoint inhibitor (atezolizumab) for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. She had been on an anti-thyroid drug for Graves' disease for two and a half years and was on the waiting list for a total thyroidectomy. However, the discovery of the severe hypothyroidism following atezolizumab-induced thyroiditis resulted in the need for long-term thyroid replacement therapy, and the planned surgery was no longer required. This case is one of the very few published reports of the use of atezolizumab in a patient with pre-existing Graves' disease, resulting in the conversion from pre-existing T3-thyrotoxicosis to overt hypothyroidism. A multidisciplinary team approach is required when using immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-existing Graves' disease or any other autoimmune disease.

Preexisting immune-mediated inflammatory disease is associated with improved survival and increased toxicity in melanoma patients who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are common, clinically significant autoinflammatory toxicities observed with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Preexisting immune-mediated inflammatory disease (pre-IMID) is considered a relative contraindication to ICI due to the risk of inciting flares. Improved understanding of the risks and benefits of treating pre-IMID patients with ICI is needed.

METHODS

We studied melanoma patients treated with ICI and enrolled in a prospective clinicopathological database. We compiled a list of 23 immune-mediated inflammatory diseases and evaluated their presence prior to ICI. We tested the associations between pre-IMID and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and irAEs.

RESULTS

In total, 483 melanoma patients were included in the study; 74 had pre-IMID and 409 did not. In patients receiving ICI as a standard of care (SoC), pre-IMID was significantly associated with irAEs (p = 0.04) as well as improved PFS (p = 0.024) and OS (p = 0.007). There was no significant association between pre-IMID and irAEs (p = 0.54), PFS (p = 0.197), or OS (p = 0.746) in patients treated through a clinical trial. Pre-IMID was significantly associated with improved OS in females (p = 0.012), but not in males (p = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

The dichotomy of the impact of pre-IMID on survival and irAEs in SoC versus clinical trial patients may reflect the inherit selection bias in patients accrued in clinical trials. Future mechanistic work is required to better understand the differences in outcomes between female and male pre-IMID patients. Our data challenge the notion that clinicians should avoid ICI in pre-IMID patients, although close monitoring and prospective clinical trials evaluating ICI in this population are warranted.

Single dose of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in active psoriasis with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy has been recognized as the standard of care in addition to chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Most immunotherapy trials, however, exclude patients with autoimmune disease owing to concerns of disease exacerbation.

CASE REPORT

We report a case of a patient with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and underlying active psoriasis who experienced a remarkable response, without developing psoriasis flares, following treatment with a single dose of atezolizumab and first-line chemotherapy.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient remained asymptomatic 10 months since treatment discontinuation, without disease progression, despite having received only a single dose of atezolizumab and six cycles of chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

Little is known about the optimum duration required to achieve a durable response with immunotherapy. Patients with autoimmune disease are commonly excluded from immunotherapy trials owing to a higher risk of autoimmune disease flares or immune-related adverse events. The remarkable outcome observed in this case offers some insights into the possible durable response with limited doses of immunotherapy and a safer approach for administering immunotherapy in patients with autoimmune disease. Initiating chemotherapy to induce remission in active autoimmune disease prior to administering immunotherapy could potentially be an ideal approach that facilitates the use of immunotherapy in this patient population.