Impact of Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status on Risk-Adjusted Hospital Readmission Rates Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

Impacts of neighborhood deprivation on septic and aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty outcomes: A comprehensive analysis using the area deprivation index

BACKGROUND

Community deprivation has been linked to poor health outcomes following primary total knee arthroplasty (pTKA), but few studies have explored revision TKA (rTKA). The present study analyzed implications of neighborhood deprivation on rTKA outcomes by characterizing relationships between Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and (1) non-home discharge disposition (DD), (2) hospital length of stay (LOS), (3) 90-day emergency department (ED) visits, (4) 90-day hospital readmissions, and (5) the effect of race on these healthcare outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 1,434 patients who underwent rTKA between January 2016 and June 2022 were analyzed. Associations between the ADI and postoperative healthcare resource utilization outcomes were evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Mediation effect was estimated using a nonparametric bootstrap resampling method.

RESULTS

Greater ADI was associated with non-home DD (p < 0.001), LOS ≥ 3 days (p < 0.001), 90-day ED visits (p = 0.015), and 90-day hospital readmission (p = 0.002). Although there was no significant difference in ADI between septic and aseptic patients, septic patients undergoing rTKA were more likely to experience non-home discharge (p < 0.001), prolonged LOS (p < 0.001), and 90-day hospital readmission (p = 0.001). The effect of race on non-home DD was found to be mediated via ADI (p = 0.038). Similarly, results showed the effect of race on prolonged LOS was mediated via ADI (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

A higher ADI was associated with non-home discharge, prolonged LOS, 90-day ED visits, and 90-day hospital readmissions. The impacts of patient race on both non-home discharge and prolonged LOS were mediated by ADI. This index allows clinicians to better understand and address disparities in rTKA outcomes.

Influence of Health Insurance Coverage on the Survival Rate for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up Analysis

This study investigated whether differences in survival rates and clinical outcomes exist in patients undergoing TKA by insurance type: National Health Insurance (NHI) vs. Medical Aid Program (MAP). This study conducted a retrospective analysis of 762 TKAs (NHI, n = 505; MAP, n = 257) with a mean follow-up of 8.4 ± 1.8 years. Patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) were evaluated using the American Knee Society's (AKS) score at the final follow-up. The survival rate of each group was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Any postoperative complications and readmissions within 90 days of discharge were recorded and compared between the groups. There were no between-group differences in pre- to postoperative improvement in AKS scores. The estimated 10-year survival rates were 98.5% in the NHI group and 96.9% in the MAP group, respectively, with no significant differences (p = 0.48). However, the length of hospital stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the MAP group than in the NHI group (13.4 days vs. 13.1 days, p = 0.03), and the transfer rate to other departments was significantly higher in the MAP group than in the NHI group (3.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04). Readmission rates for orthopedic complications for 90 days were 3.0% in the NHI group and 3.5% in the MAP group, respectively (p = 0.67). Patients' insurance type showed similar survival rates and clinical outcomes to those of primary TKA at a mean follow-up of 8.4 years, but the LOS and rate of transfer to other departments during hospitalization were influenced by insurance type.

The Utility of the Social Vulnerability Index as a Proxy for Social Disparities Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

In 2021, alternative payment models accounted for 40% of traditional Medicare reimbursements. As such, we sought to examine health disparities through a standardized categorization of social disparity using the social vulnerability index (SVI). We examined (1) risk factors for SVI ≥ 0.50, (2) incidences of complications, and (3) risk factors for total complications between patients who have SVI < 0.50 and SVI ≥ 0.50 who had a total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2022 were identified in the state of Maryland. A total of 4,952 patients who had complete social determinants of health data were included. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts according to SVI: < 0.50 (n = 2,431) and ≥ 0.50 (n = 2,521) based on the national mean SVI of 0.50. The SVI identifies communities that may need support caused by external stresses on human health based on 4 themed scores: socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing and transportation. The SVI theme of household composition and disability encompassed patients aged 65 years and more, patients aged 17 years and less, civilians who have a disability, single-parent households, and English language deficiencies. The higher the SVI, the more social vulnerability or resources are needed to thrive in a geographic area.

RESULTS

When controlling for risk factors and patient comorbidities, the theme of household composition and disability (odds ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 5.0, P = .03) was the only independent risk factor for total complications. Patients who had an SVI ≥0.50 were more likely to be women (65.8% versus 61.0%, P < .001), Black (34.4% versus 12.9%, P < .001), and have a median household income < $87,999 (21.3% versus 10.2%, P < .001) in comparison to the patients who had an SVI < 0.50, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The SVI theme of household composition and disability, encompassing patients aged 65 years and more, patients aged 17 years and less, civilians who have a disability, single-parent households, and English language deficiencies, were independent risk factors for total complications following TKA. Together, these findings offer opportunities for interventions with selected patients to address social disparities.

Racial Disparities in 30-day Readmission After Orthopaedic Surgery: A 5-year National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

Readmission rate after surgery is an important outcome measure in revealing disparities. This study aimed to examine how 30-day readmission rates and causes of readmission differ by race and specific injury areas within orthopaedic surgery.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeon-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for orthopaedic procedures from 2015 to 2019. Patients were stratified by self-reported race. Procedures were stratified using current procedural terminology codes corresponding to given injury areas. Multiple logistic regression was done to evaluate associations between race and all-cause readmission risk, and risk of readmission due to specific causes.

RESULTS

Of 780,043 orthopaedic patients, the overall 30-day readmission rate was 4.18%. Black and Asian patients were at greater (OR = 1.18, P < 0.01) and lesser (OR = 0.76, P < 0.01) risk for readmission than White patients, respectively. Black patients were more likely to be readmitted for deep surgical site infection (OR = 1.25, P = 0.03), PE (OR = 1.64, P < 0.01), or wound disruption (OR = 1.45, P < 0.01). For all races, all-cause readmission was highest after spine procedures and lowest after hand/wrist procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Black patients were at greater risk for overall, spine, shoulder/elbow, hand/wrist, and hip/knee all-cause readmission. Asian patients were at lower risk for overall, spine, hand/wrist, and hip/knee surgery all-cause readmission. Our findings can identify complications that should be more carefully monitored in certain patient populations.

Marital Status, Race, Insurance Type, and Socioeconomic Status-Assessment of Social Predictors for Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of various social determinants of health on outcomes and dispositions after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 14,462 consecutive TKA procedures between 2013 and 2021 at a multicenter hospital system. Data abstraction was done by inquiry to the Michigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative. Data points requested included basic demographics, marital status, race, insurance status, socioeconomic status measured by the Area of Deprivation Index, perioperative course, and incidence of emergency department (ED) visits and readmissions within 3 months of surgery. Subsequent multivariate analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Unmarried patients required markedly greater lengths of hospital stay and had an increased rate of discharge to skilled nursing facilities and a higher likelihood of any purpose ED visit within 90 days of surgery compared with married patients, who had a significantly greater rate of same-day discharge ( P < 0.001). Race did not markedly correlate with outcomes. Medicare patients showed a greater rate of same-day discharge, nonhome discharge, and 90-day ED visits compared with privately insured patients ( P < 0.001). Medicaid patients were more likely than privately insured patients to have a 90-day ED visit ( P < 0.001). Socioeconomic status had a minimal clinical effect on all studied outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Social factors are important considerations in understanding outcomes after TKA. Additional investigations are indicated in identifying at-risk patients and subsequent optimization of these patients.

Association of race and ethnicity with opioid prescribing for Medicare beneficiaries following total joint replacements

BACKGROUND

Profound racial and ethnic disparities exist in the use and outcomes of total hip/knee replacements (total joint replacements [TJR]). Whether similar disparities extend to post-TJR pain management remains unknown. Our objective is to examine the association of race and ethnicity with opioid fills following elective TJRs for White, Black, and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries.

METHODS

We used the 2019 national Medicare data to identify beneficiaries who underwent total hip/knee replacements. Primary outcomes were at least one opioid fill in the period from discharge to 30 days post-discharge, and 31-90 days following discharge. Secondary outcomes were morphine milligram equivalent per day and number of opioid fills. Key independent variable was patient race-ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic). We estimated multivariable hierarchical logistic regressions and two-part models with state-level clustering.

RESULTS

Among 67,550 patients, 93.36% were White, 3.69% were Black, and 2.95% were Hispanic. Compared to White patients, more Black patients and fewer Hispanic patients filled an opioid script (84.10% [Black] and 80.11% [Hispanic] vs. 80.33% [White], p < 0.001) in the 30-day period. On multivariable analysis, Black patients had 18% higher odds of filling an opioid script in the 30-day period (odds ratio [OR]: 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-1.33, p = 0.004), and 39% higher odds in the 31-90-day period (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.26-1.54, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the endpoints between Hispanic and White patients in the 30-day period. However, Hispanic patients had 20% higher odds of filling an opioid script in the 31- to 90-day period (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.34, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Important race- and ethnicity-based differences exist in post-TJR pain management with opioids. The mechanisms leading to the higher use of opioids by racial/ethnic minority patients need to be carefully examined.

Concentrated Economic Disadvantage Predicts Resource Utilization After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), a measure of geographic socioeconomic polarization, predicts several health outcomes but has not been evaluated concerning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study evaluates ICE as a predictor of post-TKA resource utilization.

METHODS

Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's New York State database from 2016 to 2017, we retrospectively evaluated 57,426 patients ≥50 years undergoing primary TKA. The ICE values for extreme concentrations of income and race were calculated using United States Census Bureau data with the formula ICEi = (Pi-Di)/Ti where Pi, Di, and Ti are the number of households in the most privileged extreme, disadvantaged extreme, and total population in zip code i, respectively. Extremes of privilege and disadvantage were defined as ≥$150,000 versus <$25,000 for income and non-Hispanic White versus non-Hispanic Black for race. Association of ICE values, demographics, and comorbidities with 90-day readmission and 90-day emergency department (ED) visits was examined using multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Overall 90-day readmission and ED visit rates were 12.8% and 9.4%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, the lowest ICEIncome quintile (concentrated poverty) predicted 90-day readmission (odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.30, P = .005) and 90-day ED visit (odds ratio 1.22, 95% confidence interval 1.08 to 1.38, P = .001). The ICERace was not predictive of either outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patients in communities with the lowest ICEIncome values use more inpatient and ED resources after primary TKA. Incorporating ICEIncome into risk-adjusted payment models may help align incentives for equitable care.

Impact of Pre-operative Opioid Use on Racial Disparities in Adverse Outcomes Post Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The growing opioid epidemic in the USA has underlying racial disparities dimensions. Also, studies have shown that patients from minority racial groups are at higher risk of adverse events following major orthopedic surgery. The aim of our study was to determine whether pre-operative opioid-use disorders (OUDs) impacted racial disparities in the likelihood of patients experiencing adverse post-operative outcomes following TKA and THA.

METHODS

Data about patients undergoing TKA and THA were collected from the 2005-2014 National Inpatient Sample databases. Regression modeling was used to assess the impact of OUDs on odds of adverse outcomes comparing racial groups. The adverse outcomes included any in-hospital post-surgical complications, prolonged length of stay (LOS), and nonhome discharge.

RESULTS

In our fully adjusted regression models using White patients as the reference group, we found that OUDs were associated with racial disparities in prolonged LOS and nonhome discharge. In the non-OUD group, Black patients had significantly higher odds of longer LOS (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.26-1.46, p-value: < 0.0001), whereas those with history of OUD had non-significantly lower odds of longer LOS (OR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.69-1.29, p-value: 0.71). Similarly, for the outcome of nonhome discharges, Black patients in the non-OUD group had significantly higher odds (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.21-1.43, p-value: < 0.0001) and those with a history of OUD had non-significantly lower odds (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.64-1.29, p-value: 0.59).

CONCLUSIONS

Significant racial disparities are present in adverse events among patients in the non-OUD group, but those disparities attenuated in the OUD group.

Evaluation of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Indication for Carpal Tunnel Release

BACKGROUND

Disparities in the utilization of orthopaedic surgery based on race and ethnicity continue to be reported. We examined the impact of sociodemographic factors on treatment recommendation by hand surgeons for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) of similar disease severity.

METHODS

Patients with electrodiagnostic study (EDS)-confirmed CTS were evaluated at a single institution between 2016 and 2020. Data including patient age, sex, race/ethnicity, ZIP Code, and EDS severity were collected. The primary outcome was the recommended treatment by the hand surgeon at the first clinic visit according to patient race/ethnicity and the Social Deprivation Index (SDI). Secondary outcomes included the treatment selected by patients (nonsurgical or surgical) and the time to surgery.

RESULTS

The 949 patients had a mean age of 58 years (range, 18 to 80 years); 60.5% (n = 574) were women. The race/ethnicity of the patient cohort was 9.8% (n = 93) Black non-Hispanic, 11.2% (n = 106) Hispanic/Latino, 70.3% (n = 667) White non-Hispanic, and 8.7% (n = 83) "other." Overall, Black non-Hispanic patients (38.7%; odds ratio, [OR] 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 0.96) and Hispanic/Latino patients (35.8%; OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.84) were less likely to have surgery recommended at their first visit compared with White non-Hispanic patients (50.5%). This was no longer apparent after adjusting for demographic and clinical variables including EDS severity and SDI (Black non-Hispanic patients: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.4 to 1.11; Hispanic/Latino patients: aOR, 0.69: 95% CI, 0.41 to 1.14). Across all categories of EDS severity, surgeons were less likely to recommend surgery to patients with a higher SDI (aOR: 0.66, 0.64, and 0.54 for quintiles 2, 3 and 4, respectively). When surgery was recommended, patients in the highest SDI quintile were less likely to proceed with surgery (p = 0.032). There was no association between patient race/ethnicity and the treatment selected by the patient or time to surgery (p = 0.303 and p = 0.725, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients experiencing higher levels of social deprivation were less likely to be recommended for CTS surgery and were less likely to proceed with surgery, regardless of patient race/ethnicity. Additional investigation into the social factors influencing both surgeon and patient selection of treatment for CTS, including the impact of patient socioeconomic background, is warranted.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Racial Disparities in Outcomes After THA and TKA Are Substantially Mediated by Socioeconomic Disadvantage Both in Black and White Patients

BACKGROUND

Demographic factors have been implicated in THA and TKA outcome disparities. Specifically, patients' racial backgrounds have been reported to influence outcomes after surgery, including length of stay, discharge disposition, and inpatient readmissions. However, in the United States, health-impacting socioeconomic disadvantage is sometimes associated with racial differences in ways that can result in important confounding, thereby raising the question of whether race-associated post-THA/TKA adverse outcomes are an independent function of race or a byproduct of confounding from socioeconomic deprivation, which is potentially addressable. To explore this, we used the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) as a proxy for socioeconomic disadvantage, since it is a socioeconomic parameter that estimates the likely deprivation associated with a patient's home address.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The goal of this study was to investigate (1) whether race (in this study, Black versus White) was independently associated with adverse outcomes, including prolonged length of stay (LOS > 3 days), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, and emergency department (ED) visits while controlling for age, gender, BMI, smoking, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), and insurance; and (2) whether socioeconomic disadvantage, measured by ADI, substantially mediated any association between race and any of the aforementioned measured outcomes.

METHODS

Between November 2018 and December 2019, 2638 underwent elective primary THA and 4915 patients underwent elective primary TKA for osteoarthritis at one of seven hospitals within a single academic center. Overall, 12% (742 of 5948) of patients were Black and 88% (5206 of 5948) were White. We included patients with complete demographic data, ADI data, and who were of Black or White race; with these criteria, 11% (293 of 2638) were excluded in the THA group, and 27% (1312 of 4915) of patients were excluded in the TKA group. In this retrospective, comparative study, patient follow-up was obtained using a longitudinally maintained database, leaving 89% (2345 of 2638) and 73% (3603 of 4915) for analysis in the THA and TKA groups, respectively. For both THA and TKA, Black patients had higher ADI scores, slightly higher BMIs, and were more likely to be current smokers at baseline. Furthermore, within the TKA cohort there was a higher proportion of Black women compared with White women. Multivariable regression analysis was utilized to assess associations between race and LOS of 3 or more days, nonhome discharge disposition, 90-day inpatient readmission, and 90-day ED admission, while adjusting for age, gender, BMI, smoking, CCI, and insurance. This was followed by a mediation analysis that explored whether the association between race (the independent variable) and measured outcomes (the dependent variables) could be partially or completely attributable to confounding from the ADI (the mediator, in this model). The mediation effect was measured as a percentage of the total effect of race on the outcomes of interest that was mediated by ADI.

RESULTS

In the THA group, after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, smoking, CCI, and insurance, White patients had lower odds of experiencing an LOS of 3 days or more (OR 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31 to 0.59]; p < 0.001) and nonhome discharge (OR 0.39 [95% CI 0.27 to 0.56]; p < 0.001). In mediation analysis, ADI partially explained (or mediated) 37% of the association between race and LOS of 3 days or more (-0.043 [95% CI -0.063 to -0.026]; p < 0.001) and 40% of the association between race and nonhome discharge (0.041 [95% CI 0.024 to 0.059]; p < 0.001). However, a smaller direct association between race and both outcomes was observed (LOS 3 days or more: -0.075 [95% CI -0.13 to -0.024]; p = 0.004; nonhome discharge: 0.060 [95% CI 0.016 to 0.11]; p = 0.004). No association was observed between race and 90-day readmission or ED admission in the THA group. In the TKA group, after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, smoking, CCI, and insurance, White patients had lower odds of experiencing an LOS of 3 days or more (OR 0.41 [95% CI 0.32 to 0.54]; p < 0.001), nonhome discharge (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.33 to 0.60]; p < 0.001), 90-day readmission (OR 0.54 [95% CI 0.39 to 0.77]; p < 0.001), and 90-day ED admission (OR 0.60 [95% CI 0.45 to 0.79]; p < 0.001). In mediation analysis, ADI mediated 19% of the association between race and LOS of 3 days or more (-0.021 [95% CI -0.035 to -0.007]; p = 0.004) and 38% of the association between race and nonhome discharge (0.029 [95% CI -0.016 to 0.040]; p < 0.001), but there was also a direct association between race and these outcomes (LOS 3 days or more: -0.088 [95% CI -0.13 to -0.049]; p < 0.001; nonhome discharge: 0.046 [95% CI 0.014 to 0.078]; p = 0.006). ADI did not mediate the associations observed between race and 90-day readmission and ED admission in the TKA group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that socioeconomic disadvantage may be implicated in a substantial proportion of the previously assumed race-driven disparity in healthcare utilization parameters after primary total joint arthroplasty. Orthopaedic surgeons should attempt to identify potentially modifiable socioeconomic disadvantage indicators. This serves as a call to action for the orthopaedic community to consider specific interventions to support patients from vulnerable areas or whose incomes are lower, such as supporting applications for nonemergent medical transportation or referring patients to local care coordination agencies. Future studies should seek to identify which specific resources or approaches improve outcomes after TJA in patients with socioeconomic disadvantage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Total Joint Arthroplasty Care: A Contemporary Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most common surgical procedures in the United States; however, racial and ethnic disparities in utilizations and outcomes have been well documented. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated associations between race/ethnicity and several metrics in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

In August 2021, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and SPORTDiscus databases were queried. Sixty three studies investigating racial/ethnic disparities in TJA utilizations, complications, mortalities, lengths of stay (LOS), discharge dispositions, readmissions, and reoperations were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

A majority of studies demonstrated disparities in TJA utilizations and outcomes. Black patients exhibited higher rates of 30-day complications (THA odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.29; TKA OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.10-1.31), 30-day mortality (THA OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.08-1.48), prolonged LOS (THA mean difference [MD] +0.27 days, 95% CI 0.21-0.33; TKA MD +0.30 days, 95% CI 0.20-0.40), nonhome discharges (THA OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37-1.57; TKA OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-1.96), and 30-day readmissions (THA OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.08-1.19; TKA OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.16-1.21) than White patients. Rates of complications (THA 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.36), prolonged LOS (TKA MD +0.20 days, 95% CI 0.17-0.23), and nonhome discharges (THA OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.10-1.45; TKA OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.22-1.53) were also increased among Hispanic patients, while Asian patients experienced longer LOS (TKA MD +0.09 days, 95% CI 0.05-0.12) but fewer readmissions. Outcomes among American Indian-Alaska Native and Pacific Islander patients were infrequently reported but similarly inequitable.

CONCLUSION

Racial and ethnic disparities in TJA utilizations and outcomes are apparent, with minority patients often demonstrating lower rates of utilizations and worse postoperative outcomes than White patients. Continued research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of recent efforts dedicated to eliminating inequalities in TJA care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Have all races experienced reductions in complication rates following total hip arthroplasty? A NSQIP analysis between 2011 and 2019

INTRODUCTION

Despite numerous articles in the orthopedic literature evaluating racial and ethnic disparities, inequalities in total joint arthroplasty outcomes remain. While the National Surgical Quality Improvement (NSQIP) database has been previously utilized to highlight these disparities, no previous analysis has evaluated how the rate of various perioperative complications has changed over recent years when segregating by patient race. Specifically, we evaluated if all races have experienced decreases in (1) medical complications, (2) wound complications, (3) venous thromboembolism (VTE), and (4) readmission/reoperation rates following total hip arthroplasty (THA) over recent years?

METHODS

Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 27,130 (total hip arthroplasty) was utilized to identify all THA procedures conducted between 2011 and 2019. Patients were segregated according to race and various demographics were collected. Linear regression was utilized to evaluate changes in each complication rate between 2011 and 2019. A multivariate regression was then conducted for each complication to evaluate whether race independently was associated with each outcome.

RESULTS

Our analysis included a total of 212,091 patients undergoing primary THA. This included 182,681 (85.76%) White, 19,267 (9.04%) Black, 5928 (2.78%) Hispanic, and 4215 (1.98%) Asian patients. We found that for urinary tract infection (UTI), acute renal failure, superficial SSI, and readmission rates, White patients experienced significant reductions between 2011 and 2019. However, this was not consistent across all races. Black race was associated with a significantly increased risk of acute renal failure (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.17-3.34; p = 0.008), renal insufficiency (OR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.62-3.28; p < 0.001), deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07-1.66; p = 0.01), and pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR: 1.76, 95% CIL: 1.36-2.24; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis highlights specific complications for which further interventions are necessary to reduce inequalities across races. These include medical optimization, increased patient education, and continued efforts at understanding how social factors may impact-related care inequalities. Future study is needed to evaluate specific interventions that can be applied at the health systems level to ensure all patients undergoing THA receive the highest quality of care regardless of race.

Impact of the 2016 American College of Surgeons Guideline Revision on Overlapping Lumbar Fusion Cases at a Large Academic Medical Center

OBJECTIVE

The American College of Surgeons (ACS) updated its guidelines on overlapping surgery in 2016. The objective was to examine differences in postoperative outcomes following overlapping cases either pre-ACS guideline revision or post-guideline revision, in a coarsened exact matching (CEM) sample.

METHODS

3,327 consecutive adult patients undergoing single-level, posterior lumbar fusion from 2013-2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were separated into a pre-ACS guideline revision cohort (surgery before April 2016) or a post-guideline revision cohort (surgery after October 2016) for comparison. The primary outcomes were proportion of cases performed with any degree of overlap, and adverse events including 30-day and 90-day rates of readmission, reoperation, Emergency Department visit, morbidity, and mortality. Subsequently, CEM was employed among overlapping surgery patients only to assess the impact of the ACS guideline revision on overlapping outcomes, while controlling for attending surgeon and key patient characteristics known to affect surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

After the implementation of the ACS guidelines, fewer cases were performed with overlap (22.0% vs. 53.7%, p<0.001). Patients in the post-ACS guideline revision cohort experienced improved rates of readmission and reoperation within 30 and 90 days. However, when limited to overlapping cases only, no differences were observed in overlap outcomes pre- vs. post-ACS guideline revision. Similarly, when exact matched on risk-associated patient characteristics and attending surgeon, overlapping surgery patients pre- and post-ACS guideline revision experienced similar rates of 30- and 90-day outcomes.

CONCLUSION

After the ACS guideline revision, no discernable impact was observed on postoperative outcomes following lumbar fusion cases performed with overlap.

Social Risk Adjustment In The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program: A Systematic Review And Implications For Policy

Value-based payment programs adjust payments to providers based on spending, quality, or health outcomes. Concern that these programs penalize providers disproportionately serving vulnerable patients prompted calls to adjust performance measures for social risk factors. We reviewed fourteen studies of social risk adjustment in Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP), a value-based payment model that initially did not adjust for social risk factors but subsequently began to do so. Seven studies found that adding social risk factors to the program's base risk-adjustment model (which adjusts only for age, sex, and comorbidities) reduced differences in risk-adjusted readmissions and penalties between safety-net hospitals and other hospitals. Three studies found that peer grouping, the HRRP's current approach to social risk adjustment, reduced penalties among safety-net hospitals. Two studies found that differences in risk-adjusted readmissions and penalties were further narrowed when augmentation of the base model was combined with peer grouping. Two studies showed that it is possible to adjust for social risk factors without obscuring quality differences between hospitals. These findings support the use of social risk adjustment to improve provider payment equity and highlight opportunities to enhance social risk adjustment in value-based payment programs.

Evaluating Resource Utilization for In-Person and Virtual Joint Classes in Total Joint Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Attendance Patterns at a Large Metropolitan Health System

BACKGROUND

Provider-run "joint classes" educate total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients on how to best prepare for surgery and maximize recovery. There is no research on potential healthcare inequities in the context of joint classes or on the impact of the recent shift toward telehealth due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Using data from a large metropolitan health system, we aimed to (1) identify demographic patterns in prepandemic joint class attendance and (2) understand the impact of telehealth on attendance.

METHODS

We included data on 3,090 TJA patients from three centers, each with a separately operated joint class. Attendance patterns were assessed prepandemic and after the resumption of elective surgeries when classes transitioned to telehealth. Statistical testing included standardized differences (SD > 0.1 indicates significance) and a multivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

The in-person and telehealth attendance rates were 69.9% and 69.2%, respectively. Joint class attendance was significantly higher for non-White, Hispanic, non-English primary language, Medicaid, and Medicare patients (all SD > 0.1). Age was a determinant of attendance for telehealth (SD > 0.1) but not for in-person (SD = 0.04). Contrastingly, physical distance from hospital was significant for in-person (SD > 0.1) but not for telehealth (SD = 0.06). On a multivariate analysis, distance from hospital (P < .05) and telehealth (P < .0001) were predictors of failed class attendance.

CONCLUSION

This work highlights the relative importance of joint classes in specific subgroups of patients. Although telehealth attendance was lower, telehealth alleviated barriers to access related to physical distance but increased barriers for older patients. These results can guide providers on preoperative education and the implementation of telehealth.

Caring for Diverse and High-Risk Patients: Surgeon, Health System, and Patient Integration

Access and outcome disparities exist in hip and knee arthroplasty care. These disparities are associated with race, ethnicity, and social determinants of health such as income, housing, transportation, education, language, and health literacy. Additionally, medical comorbidities affecting postoperative outcomes are more prevalent in underresourced communities, which are more commonly communities of color. Navigating racial and ethnic differences in treating our patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty is necessary to reduce inequitable care. It is important to recognize our implicit biases and lessen their influence on our healthcare decision-making. Social determinants of health need to be addressed on a large scale as the current inequitable system disproportionally impacts communities of color. Patients with lower health literacy have a higher risk of postoperative complications and poor outcomes after hip and knee replacement. Low health literacy can be addressed by improving communication, reducing barriers to care, and supporting patients in their efforts to improve their own health. High-risk patients require more financial, physical, and mental resources to care for them, and hospitals, surgeons, and health insurance companies are often disincentivized to do so. By advocating for alternative payment models that adjust for the increased risk and take into account the increased perioperative work needed to care for these patients, surgeons can help reduce inequities in access to care. We have a responsibility to our patients to recognize and address social determinants of health, improve the diversity of our workforce, and advocate for improved access to care to decrease inequity and outcomes disparities in our field.

Nationwide Readmission Rates and Hospital Charges for Patients With Surgical Evacuation of Nontraumatic Subdural Hematomas: Part 1-Craniotomy

BACKGROUND

Despite patients experiencing high recurrence and readmission rates after surgical management of nontraumatic subdural hematomas (SDHs), few studies have examined the causes and predictors of unplanned readmissions in this population on a national scale.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze independent factors predicting 30-day hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of nontraumatic SDH in patients who survived their index surgery and evaluate hospital readmission rates and charges.

METHODS

Using the Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified patients who underwent craniotomy for nontraumatic SDH evacuation (2010-2015) using a retrospective cohort observational study design. National estimates and variances within the cohort were calculated after stratifying, hospital clustering, and weighting variables.

RESULTS

Among 49 013 patients, 10 643 (21.7%) had at least 1 readmission within 30 days of their index treatment and 38 370 (78.3%) were not readmitted. Annual readmission rates did not change during the study period ( P = .74). The most common primary causes of 30-day readmissions were recurrent SDH (n = 3949, 37.1%), venous thromboembolism (n = 1373, 12.9%), and delayed hyponatremia and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (n = 1363, 12.8%). Comorbidities that independently predicted readmission included congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coagulopathy, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, lymphoma, fluid and electrolyte disorders, metastatic cancer, peripheral vascular disease, psychosis, and renal failure ( P ≤ .03). Household income in the 51st to 75th percentile was associated with a decreased risk of readmission.

CONCLUSION

National trends in 30-day readmission rates after nontraumatic SDH treatment by craniotomy provide quality benchmarks that can be used to drive quality improvement efforts on a national level.

Racial Differences in Care and Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasties: Did the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Program Make a Difference?

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of literature on racial differences across a full total joint arthroplasty (TJA) "episode of care" and beyond. Given various incentives, the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) program in the U.S. may have impacted preexisting racial differences across this care continuum. The purposes of the present study were (1) to assess trends in racial differences in care/outcome characteristics before, during, and after TJA surgery and (2) to assess if the CJR program coincided with reductions in these racial differences.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study includes data on 1,483,221 TJAs (based on Medicare claims data, 2013 to 2018). Racial differences between Black and White patients were assessed for (1) preoperative characteristics (Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index, patient sex, and age), (2) characteristics during hospitalization (length of stay, blood transfusions, and combined complications), and (3) postoperative characteristics (90 and 180-day readmission rates and institutional post-acute care). Additionally, Medicare payments for each period were assessed. Racial differences (Black versus White patients) were expressed in terms of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) per year. A "difference-in-differences" analysis (comparing before and after CJR implementation, with non-CJR hospitals being used as controls) estimated the association of the CJR program with changes in racial differences.

RESULTS

In both 2013 and 2018, Black patients (n = 74,390; 5.0%) were more likely than White patients to have a higher Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index (score of >0) (OR = 1.32 [95% CI = 1.28 to 1.36] and OR = 1.32 [95% CI = 1.28 to 1.37]), to require more transfusions (OR = 1.55 [95% CI = 1.49 to 1.62] and OR = 1.77 [95% CI = 1.56 to 2.01]), to be discharged to institutional post-acute care (OR = 1.40 [95% CI = 1.36 to 1.44] and OR = 1.49 [95% CI = 1.43 to 1.56]), and to be readmitted within 90 days (OR = 1.38 [95% CI = 1.32 to 1.44] and OR = 1.21 [95% CI = 1.13 to 1.29]) (p < 0.05 for all). Adjusted difference-in-differences analyses demonstrated that the CJR program coincided with reductions in racial differences in 90-day readmission (-1.24%; 95% CI, -2.46% to -0.03%) and 180-day readmission (-1.28%; 95% CI, -2.52% to -0.03%) (p = 0.044 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Racial differences persist among patients managed with TJA. The CJR program coincided with reductions in some racial differences, thus identifying bundle design as a potential novel strategy to target racial disparities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Household Income on Short-Term Outcomes Following Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor Resection

Objectives  The objective of this study is to elucidate the impact of income on short-term outcomes in a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection population. Design  This is a retrospective regression analysis. Setting  This study was done at a single, multihospital, urban academic medical center. Participants  Over 6 years (from June 7, 2013, to April 24, 2019), 277 consecutive CPA tumor cases were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes studied included readmission, emergency department evaluation, unplanned return to surgery, return to surgery after index admission, and mortality. Univariate analysis was conducted among the entire population with significance set at a p -value <0.05. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income and univariate analysis conducted between the lowest (quartile 1 [Q1]) and highest (quartile 4 [Q4]) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p -value <0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations among study variables and to identify confounding factors. Results  Regression analysis of 273 patients demonstrated decreased rates of unplanned reoperation ( p  = 0.015) and reoperation after index admission ( p  = 0.035) at 30 days with higher standardized income. Logistic regression between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles demonstrated decreased unplanned reoperation ( p  = 0.045) and decreasing but not significant reoperation after index admission ( p  = 0.15) for Q4 patients. No significant difference was observed for other metrics of morbidity and mortality. Conclusion  Higher socioeconomic status is associated with decreased risk of unplanned reoperation following CPA tumor resection.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantages Associated With Prolonged Lengths of Stay, Nonhome Discharges, and 90-Day Readmissions After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Low socioeconomic status and neighborhood context has been linked to poor health care outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The area deprivation index (ADI) addresses this relationship by ranking neighborhoods by socioeconomic disadvantage. We examined the following relationships of the ADI among TKA recipients: (1) patient demographics, (2) lengths of stay (LOS), (3) nonhome discharges, and (4) 90-day readmissions, emergency department visits, and reoperations.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of primary TKAs from 2018 through 2020 at a tertiary health care system. A total of 3928 patients who had complete ADI data were included. A plurality of patients (14.9%) were categorized within ADI 31-40, below the national median ADI of 47. Associations between the national ADI decile and 90-day postoperative health care utilization metrics were evaluated using multivariate regressions (adjusted for patient demographics and comorbidities).

RESULTS

The 91-100 ADI cohort was disproportionately African American, female, younger, and smokers. Compared with ADI 31-40 (reference), the ADI 61-70 cohort was associated with higher odds of LOS ≥3 days (odds ratio [OR] = 1.6 [1.08-2.36], P = .019) and nonhome discharges (OR = 1.73 [1.08-2.75], P = .021). The ADI 91-100 cohort was associated with the highest odds of prolonged LOS (OR = 2.27; [1.47-3.49], P < .001), nonhome discharges (OR = 3.49 [2.11-5.78], P < .001), and all-cause readmissions (OR: 1.79, [1.02-3.14], P = .044). No significant associations were found between the ADI and 90-day emergency department visits or reoperations (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

A higher ADI was associated with prolonged LOS, nonhome discharge status, and 90-day readmissions after TKA. This index highlights potential areas of intervention for assessing health care outcomes.

Revisiting Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Population-based Study

Background:

Population-based studies showing the advantage of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (CATKA) over conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are outdated. More recent institution-based studies with relatively small sample sizes may hinder wider adoption. This cohort-based study aimed to compare postoperative CATKA and TKA in-hospital complications and 90-day all-cause readmissions using 2017-2018 data.

Methods:

Patients who underwent a primary unilateral CATKA or TKA were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database. In-hospital complications were defined based on the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services total hip arthroplasty and TKA complications measure. Ninety-day readmissions were identified using unique patient identifiers. Logistic regression with a generalized estimating equation was used to assess associations of computer assistance with in-hospital complications and 90-day all-cause readmissions.

Results:

A total of 80,468 TKAs were identified during the study period, of which 7,395 (9.2%) were CATKAs. Significantly fewer complications occurred among patients who had CATKAs compared with conventional TKAs (0.4% of total CATKAs vs 2.6% of total conventional TKAs, P < 0.001); patients who had CATKAs had fewer 90-day all-cause readmissions compared with those who underwent TKAs (363 vs 4,169 revisits, P < 0.01). Computer assistance was associated with significantly lower odds of in-hospital complications (odds ratio, 0.15, 95% confidence interval, 0.09 to 0.24; P < 0.05) but not 90-day all-cause readmissions.

Conclusion:

Patients undergoing CATKAs had markedly lower odds of in-hospital complications, compared with patients having TKAs, which has implications for both patient outcomes and hospital reimbursement. These more recent cohort-based findings encourage wider CATKA adoption.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on 30 and 90-Day Readmission Rates After Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Since its 2012 inception, the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) has espoused cost-effective health-care delivery by financially penalizing hospitals with excessive 30-day readmission rates. In this study, we hypothesized that socioeconomic factors impact readmission rates of patients undergoing spine surgery.

METHODS

In this study, 2,830 patients who underwent a spine surgical procedure between 2012 and 2018 were identified retrospectively from our institutional database, with readmission (postoperative day [POD] 0 to 30 and POD 31 to 90) as the outcome of interest. Patients were linked to U.S. Census Tracts and ZIP codes using the Geographic Information Systems (ArcGIS) mapping program. Social determinants of health (SDOH) were obtained from publicly available databases. Patient income was estimated at the Public Use Microdata Area level based on U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey data. Univariate and multivariable stepwise regression analyses were conducted. Significance was defined as p < 0.05, with Bonferroni corrections as appropriate.

RESULTS

Race had a significant effect on readmission only among patients whose estimated incomes were <$31,650 (χ2 = 13.4, p < 0.001). Based on a multivariable stepwise regression, patients with estimated incomes of <$31,000 experienced greater odds of readmission by POD 30 compared with patients with incomes of >$62,000; the odds ratio (OR) was 11.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 6.35 to 15.57). There were higher odds of 30-day readmission for patients living in neighborhoods with higher diabetes prevalence (OR, 3.02 [95% CI, 1.60 to 5.49]) and patients living in neighborhoods with limited access to primary care providers (OR, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.70]). Lastly, each decile increase in the Area Deprivation Index of a patient's Census Tract was associated with higher odds of 30-day readmission (OR, 1.40 [95% CI, 1.30 to 1.51]).

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients and patients from areas of high social deprivation have a higher risk of readmission following a spine surgical procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outcomes of Total Joint Arthroplasty in Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic Groups Versus Local Population: A Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

 Total hip and knee replacement decrease the disability caused by osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Although it has been established that racial and ethnic minorities underutilize these procedures, little data on postoperative outcomes exists. The impact of race on postoperative Oxford scores and complications following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) will be investigated in this retrospective review.

METHODS

 A retrospective review of 120 elective primary TJA procedures was undertaken between January 2016 and December 2019 in a single institution. To measure variations between the various groups, t-tests were used on their Oxford scores, and chi-squared bivariate regression was used to classify all categorical variables and the association of ethnicity and surgery type with gender.

RESULTS

 There were 62 (51.6%) White patients and 59 (49.1.0%) Black, Asian, Minority Ethnic (BAME) patients in total. The majority of the patients were females (60.9% vs 39.2%, p = 0.032). Low vitamin D levels were seen in a small percentage of patients in the sample (15.8% vs 84.2%, p = 0.460). There is a statistically important connection (p = 0.001) between the surgery type (total knee replacement [TKR]/total hip replacement [THR]) and gender; 41 females had TKR surgery, and 32 had THR surgery.

CONCLUSION

The study found that the relationships between ethnicity (White/BAME) and gender as well as surgery type (TKR/THR) and gender are statistically important. In all cases with low vitamin D and normal vitamin D levels, White patients had higher overall Oxford hip scores than the BAME patients. To comprehend the differences discovered, further research is needed. To try to eliminate the difference, targeted approaches should be created.

Reporting and Analyzing Demographics in the Journal of Arthroplasty: Are We Making Progress?

BACKGROUND

Demographic factors, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), race, and ethnicity have great effects on the outcomes of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. A portion of this data is included in nearly every study, but the completeness with which it is reported is variable. The purpose of this study is to investigate the frequency at which demographic information is reported and analyzed through formal statistical methods in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (JOA).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted of RCTs published in JOA between 2015 and 2019. For each study, we determined if age, sex, weight, height, BMI, race, and ethnicity were reported and/or analyzed. The overall frequency was assessed, along with the rates of reporting by individual year. Studies were evaluated using Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

RESULTS

Age (96.7%), sex (96.7%), and BMI (80.4%) were reported by the majority of studies. There was very little information provided regarding race (6.2%) and ethnicity (3.8%); although both were reported at the highest frequency in 2019, the final year of articles reviewed. Sex was the most frequently analyzed variable at 11.5%. Only 1 study (0.5%) analyzed ethnicity and no studies analyzed race.

CONCLUSION

Although age, sex, and BMI are reported at a high rate, RCTs published in JOA rarely reported information on patient race and ethnicity. Demographics were infrequently included as part of statistical analysis. The importance of this information should be recognized and included in the analysis and interpretation of future studies.

Overlap Before the Critical Step of Lumbar Fusion Does Not Lead to Increased Short-Term Morbidity

BACKGROUND

Few studies have assessed the impact of overlapping surgery during different timepoints of neurosurgical procedures.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of overlap before the critical portion of surgery on short-term patient outcomes following lumbar fusion.

METHODS

In total, 3799 consecutive patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion over 6 yr (2013-2019) at an academic hospital system were retrospectively studied. Outcomes included 30-d emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, mortality, overall morbidity, and overall morbidity/surgical complications. Duration of overlap that occurred before the critical portion of surgery was calculated as a percentage of total beginning operative time. Univariate logistic regression was used to assess the impact of incremental 1% increases in the duration of overlap within the whole population and patients with beginning overlap. Subsequently, univariate analysis was used to compare exact matched patients with the least (bottom 40%) and most amounts of overlap (100% beginning overlap). Coarsened exact matching was used to match patients on key demographic factors, as well as attending surgeon. Significance was set at a P-value < .05.

RESULTS

Increased duration of beginning overlap was associated with a decrease in 30-d ED visit (P = .03) within all patients with beginning overlap, but not within the whole population undergoing lumbar fusion. Duration of beginning overlap was not associated with any other short-term morbidity or mortality outcome in either the whole population or patients with beginning overlap.

CONCLUSION

Increased duration of overlap before the critical step of surgery does not predict adverse short-term outcomes after single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion.

The Influence of Household Income on Survival following Posterior Fossa Tumor Resection at a Large Academic Medical Center

Objectives  The present study examines the effect of median household income on mid- and long-term outcomes in a posterior fossa brain tumor resection population. Design  This is a retrospective regression analysis. Setting  The study conducted at a single, multihospital, urban academic medical center. Participants  A total of 283 consecutive posterior fossa brain tumor cases, excluding cerebellar pontine angle tumors, over a 6-year period (June 09, 2013-April 26, 2019) was included in this analysis. Main Outcome Measures  Outcomes studied included 90-day readmission, 90-day emergency department evaluation, 90-day return to surgery, reoperation within 90 days after index admission, reoperation throughout the entire follow-up period, mortality within 90 days, and mortality throughout the entire follow-up period. Univariate analysis was conducted for the whole population and between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles. Stepwise regression was conducted to identify confounding variables. Results  Lower socioeconomic status was found to be correlated with increased mortality within 90 postoperative days and throughout the entire follow-up period. Similarly, analysis between the lowest and highest household income quartiles (Q1 vs. Q4) demonstrated Q4 to have significantly decreased mortality during total follow-up and a decreasing but not significant difference in 90-day mortality. No significant difference in morbidity was observed. Conclusion  This study suggests that lower household income is associated with increased mortality in both the 90-day window and total follow-up period. It is possible that there is an opportunity for health care providers to use socioeconomic status to proactively identify high-risk patients and provide additional resources in the postoperative setting.

Overlapping single-level lumbar fusion and adverse short-term outcomes

OBJECTIVE

There is a paucity of research on the safety of overlapping surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of overlapping surgery on a homogenous population of exactly matched patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively analyzed case data of 3799 consecutive adult patients who underwent single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion during a 6-year period (June 7, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a multihospital university health system. Outcomes included 30-day emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, and morbidity and mortality following surgery. Thereafter, coarsened exact matching was used to match patients with and without overlap on key demographic factors, including American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, sex, and body mass index (BMI), among others. Patients were subsequently matched by both demographic data and by the specific surgeon performing the operation. Univariate analysis was carried out on the whole population, the demographically matched cohort, and the surgeon-matched cohort, with significance set at a p value < 0.05.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in morbidity or any short-term outcome, including readmission, reoperation, ED evaluation, and mortality. Among the demographically matched cohort and surgeon-matched cohort, there was no significant difference in age, sex, history of prior surgery, ASA class, or CCI score. Overlapping surgery patients in both the demographically matched cohort and the matched cohort limited by surgeon had longer durations of surgery (p < 0.01), but no increased morbidity or mortality was noted. Patients selected for overlap had fewer prior surgeries and lower ASA class and CCI score (p < 0.01). Patients with overlap also had a longer duration of surgery (p < 0.01) but not duration of closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Exactly matched patients undergoing overlapping single-level lumbar fusion procedures had no increased short-term morbidity or mortality; however, duration of surgery was 20 minutes longer on average for overlapping operations. Further studies should assess long-term patient outcomes and the impact of overlap in this and other surgical procedures.

Postoperative outcomes and the association with overlap before or after the critical step of lumbar fusion

OBJECTIVE

This study assesses how degree of overlap, either before or after the critical operative portion, affects lumbar fusion outcomes.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively studied 3799 consecutive patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion over 6 years (2013-2019) at a university health system. Outcomes recorded within 30-90 and 0-90 postoperative days included emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, reoperation, overall morbidity, and mortality. Furthermore, morbidity and mortality were recorded for the duration of follow-up. The amount of overlap that occurred before or after the critical portion of surgery was calculated as a percentage of total beginning or end operative time. Subsequent to initial whole-population analysis, coarsened exact-matched cohorts of patients were created with the least and most amounts of either beginning or end overlap. Univariate analysis was performed on both beginning and end overlap exact-matched cohorts, with significance set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Equivalent outcomes were observed when comparing exact-matched patients. Among the whole population, the degree of beginning overlap was correlated with reduced ED visits within 30-90 and 0-90 days (p = 0.007, p = 0.009; respectively), and less 0-90 day morbidity (p = 0.037). Degree of end overlap was correlated with fewer 30-90 day ED visits (p = 0.015). When comparing only patients with overlap, degree of beginning overlap was correlated with fewer 0-90 day reoperations (p = 0.022), and no outcomes were correlated with degree of end overlap.

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of overlap before or after the critical step of surgery does not lead to worse outcomes after lumbar fusion.

Use of a Mandatory Clinical Decision Unit Reduces Readmission Rates following Total Joint Arthroplasty

Readmission penalties have encouraged the implementation of protocols to reduce readmission rates. We hypothesized that by keeping postoperative patients, who return to the emergency department (ED) in a clinical decision unit (CDU) until being evaluated by the orthopaedic team, there would be a reduction in the readmission rate after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) at our institution. Our institution mandated the use of the CDU for all potential orthopaedic TJA readmissions. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed on 365 patients who presented to the ED after either total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Patients presenting in the year prior to the implementation of the CDU program were compared with patients presenting in the year after implementation. Demographics, length of stay, comorbidities, and 30-day readmission rates were recorded. Additionally, a financial analysis was performed. Overall, for THA and TKA, there were a combined 141 ED visits prior to the implementation of the CDU program and 224 afterward; of these, 40 were readmitted before the CDU program and only 13 were readmitted afterward (p < 0.01). The financial analysis found that the overall 90-day cost for patients in the postoperative period was nearly $800 lower on average (p = 0.027) post-CDU implementation.During the first year of the CDU project at our institution, we significantly reduced the readmission rates following TJA and demonstrated significant cost saving. This is a Level III, prognostic study.

Which Socioeconomic Factors Affect Outcomes Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that lower socioeconomic status may result in adverse outcomes following total hip (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The optimal method of defining socioeconomic status, however, continues to be debated. The purpose of this study is to determine which socioeconomic variables are associated with poor outcomes following THA and TKA.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 2770 primary THA and TKA patients from 2015 to 2018. Utilizing census data based upon the patient's ZIP code, we extracted poverty, unemployment, high school graduation, and vehicle possession rates. We collected demographics, comorbidities, discharge disposition, 90-day readmissions, and postoperative functional outcome scores for each patient. We then performed a multivariate regression analysis to identify the effect of each socioeconomic variable on postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients from areas with high unemployment (P = .008) and low high school graduation rates (P = .019) had a higher age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index. High poverty levels, high unemployment, lower high school graduation rate, and lower vehicle possession rates did not have a significant effect on functional outcomes (all P > .05). In the multivariate analysis, no socioeconomic variable demonstrated an increased rate of rehabilitation discharge, revision, or readmission (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing THA and TKA from areas with high unemployment and lower educational levels do have more medical comorbidities. However, none of the 4 socioeconomic variables studied are independently associated with higher rates of readmission, discharge to rehabilitation, or worse functional outcomes. Patients from disadvantaged areas should not be denied access to arthroplasty care based on socioeconomic status alone.

Association of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model With Disparities in the Use of Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement

Importance

The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model is Medicare's mandatory bundled payment reform to improve quality and spending for beneficiaries who need total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR), yet it does not account for sociodemographic risk factors such as race/ethnicity and income. Results of this study could be the basis for a Medicare payment reform that addresses inequities in joint replacement care.

Objective

To examine the association of the CJR model with racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in the use of elective THR and TKR among older Medicare beneficiaries after accounting for the population of patients who were at risk or eligible for these surgical procedures.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This cohort study used the 2013 to 2017 national Medicare data and multivariable logistic regressions with triple-differences estimation. Medicare beneficiaries who were aged 65 to 99 years, entitled to Medicare, alive at the end of the calendar year, and residing either in the 67 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) mandated to participate in the CJR model or in the 104 control MSAs were identified. A subset of Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis of arthritis underwent THR or TKR. Data were analyzed from March to December 2020.

Exposures

Implementation of the CJR model in 2016.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Outcomes were separate binary indicators for whether a beneficiary underwent THR or TKR. Key independent variables were MSA treatment status, pre- or post-CJR model implementation phase, combination of race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic beneficiaries) and dual eligibility, and their interactions. Logistic regression models were used to control for patient characteristics, MSA fixed effects, and time trends.

Results

The 2013 cohort included 4 447 205 Medicare beneficiaries, of which 2 025 357 (45.5%) resided in MSAs with the CJR model. The cohort's mean (SD) age was 77.18 (7.95) years, and it was composed of 2 951 140 female (66.4%), 3 928 432 non-Hispanic White (88.3%), and 657 073 dually eligible (14.8%) beneficiaries. Before the CJR model implementation, rates were highest among non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries at 1.25% (95% CI, 1.24%-1.26%) for THR use and 2.28% (95% CI, 2.26%-2.29%) for TKR use in MSAs with CJR model. Compared with MSAs without the CJR model and the analogous race/ethnicity and dual-eligibility group, the CJR model was associated with a 0.10 (95% CI, 0.05-0.15; P < .001) percentage-point increase in TKR use for non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, a 0.11 (95% CI, 0.004-0.21; P = .04) percentage-point increase for non-Hispanic White dual-eligible beneficiaries, a 0.15 (95% CI, -0.29 to -0.01; P = .04) percentage-point decrease for non-Hispanic Black non-dual-eligible beneficiaries, and a 0.18 (95% CI, -0.34 to -0.01; P = .03) percentage-point decrease for non-Hispanic Black dual-eligible beneficiaries. These CJR model-associated changes in TKR use were 0.25 (95% CI, -0.40 to -0.10; P = .001) percentage points lower for non-Hispanic Black non-dual-eligible beneficiaries and 0.27 (95% CI, -0.45 to -0.10; P = .002) percentage points lower for non-Hispanic Black dual-eligible beneficiaries compared with the model-associated changes for non-Hispanic White non-dual-eligible beneficiaries. No association was found between the CJR model and a widening of the THR use gap among race/ethnicity and dual eligibility groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study indicate that the CJR model was associated with a modest increase in the already substantial difference in TKR use among non-Hispanic Black vs non-Hispanic White beneficiaries; no difference was found for THR. These findings support the widespread concern that payment reform has the potential to exacerbate disparities in access to joint replacement care.

The impact of gender on long-term outcomes following supratentorial brain tumor resection

PURPOSE

Gender is a known social determinant of health which has been linked disparities in medical care. This study intends to assess the impact of gender on 90-day and long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes following supratentorial brain tumor resection in a coarsened-exact matched population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1970 consecutive patients at a single, university-wide health system undergoing supratentorial brain tumor resection over a six-year period (09 June 2013 to 26 April 2019) were analyzed retrospectively. Coarsened Exact Matching was employed to match patients on key demographic factors including history of prior surgery, smoking status, median household income, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), amongst others. Primary outcomes assessed included readmission, ED visit, unplanned reoperation, and mortality within 90 days of surgery. Long-term outcomes such as mortality and unplanned return to surgery during the entire follow-up period were also recorded.

RESULTS

Whole-population regression demonstrated significantly increased mortality throughout the entire follow-up period for the male cohort (p = 0.004, OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.09 - 1.59); however, no significant difference was found after coarsened exact matching was performed (p = 0.08). In both the whole-population regression and matched-cohort analysis, no significant difference was observed between gender and readmission, ED visit, unplanned reoperation, or mortality in the 90-day post-operative window, in addition to return to surgery after throughout the entire follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

After controlling for confounding variables, female birth gender did not significantly predict any difference in morbidity and mortality outcomes following supratentorial brain tumor resection. Difference between mortality outcomes in the pre-matched population versus the matched cohort suggests the need to better manage the underlying health conditions of male patients in order to prevent future disparities.

Duration of overlap during lumbar fusion does not predict outcomes

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between degree of surgical overlap and adverse postoperative outcomes remains poorly defined. This study aims to evaluate the impact of increasing duration of overlap on lumbar fusion outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

1302 adult patients undergoing overlapping surgery during single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion at a multi-hospital, university health system were retrospectively assessed. Amount of overlap was calculated as a percentage of total overlap time. Patients were separated into groups with the most (top 10% of patients) and least amounts of overlap (bottom 40% of patients). Using Coarsened Exact Matching, patients with the most and least amounts of overlap were matched on demographics alone, then on both demographics and attending surgeon. Univariate analysis was performed for the whole population and both matched cohorts to compare amount of overlap to risk of adverse postsurgical events. Significance for all analyses was p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Duration of overlap was not associated with outcomes in the whole population, demographic-matched, or surgeon-matched analyses. Before exact matching, patients with the most amount of overlap had a significantly higher CCI score (p = 0.031) and shorter length of surgery (p = 0.006). In the demographic matched cohort, patients with increased overlap had a significantly shorter length of surgery (p = 0.001) only. In the surgeon matched cohort, there were no differences in length of surgery or CCI score.

CONCLUSIONS

Duration of surgical overlap does not predict adverse outcomes following lumbar fusion. These results suggest that overlapping surgery is a safe practice within this common neurosurgical indication.

Patients undergoing overlapping posterior single-level lumbar fusion are not at greater risk for adverse 90-day outcomes

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated overlapping surgery on long-term outcomes following elective, single-level lumbar fusion on exact matched patients undergoing surgery with or without overlap.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

3799 consecutive adult patients undergoing single-level, posterior-only lumbar fusion over a six-year period at a multi-hospital university health system were retrospectively followed. Reported outcomes included reoperation, emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, overall morbidity and mortality in the 90 days following surgery. Coarsened Exact Matching was used to match patients with and without overlap on key demographic factors. Patients were subsequently matched by both demographic data and by the attending surgeon performing the operation. Univariate analysis was carried out on the whole population, the demographic matched cohort, and demographic and surgeon matched cohort, with significance set at a p-value < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients with overlap had a longer duration of surgery and were less likely to have an ED visit within 90 days of surgery (p < 0.03) but had no other significant differences. Within the demographic matched cohort and demographic/surgeon matched cohort, there was no significant difference in age, gender, history of prior surgery, ASA score, or CCI score, but patients with overlap had a longer duration of surgery (p < 0.01). Patients did not have significant differences with respect to any morbidity or mortality outcome in either the demographic or surgeon matched cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing overlapping, single-level lumbar fusion were not at greater risk of long-term morbidity or mortality, despite having a significantly longer duration of surgery.

Association of Socioeconomic Area Deprivation Index with Hospital Readmissions After Colon and Rectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Risk adjustment for reimbursement and quality measures omits social risk factors despite adversely affecting health outcomes. Social risk factors are not usually available in electronic health records (EHR) or administrative data. Socioeconomic status can be assessed by using US Census data. Distressed Communities Index (DCI) is based upon zip codes, and the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) provides more granular estimates at the block group level. We examined the association of neighborhood disadvantage using the ADI, DCI, and patient-level insurance status on 30-day readmission risk after colorectal surgery.

METHODS

Our 677 patient cohort was derived from the 2013-2017 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program at a safety net hospital augmented with EHR data to determine insurance status and 30-day readmissions. Patients' home addresses were linked to the ADI and DCI.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 53.9% males and 63.8% Hispanics with a 22.9% 30-day readmission rate from the date of discharge; > 50% lived in highly deprived neighborhoods. Controlling for medical comorbidities and complications, ADI was associated with increased risk of 30 days from the date of discharge readmissions among patients living in medium (OR = 2.15, p = .02) or high (OR = 1.88, p = .03) deprived areas compared to less-deprived neighborhoods, but not insurance status or DCI.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADI identified patients living in deprived communities with increased readmission risk. Our results show that block-group level ADI can potentially be used in risk adjustment, to identify high-risk patients and to design better care pathways that improve health outcomes.

The role of socioeconomic status on outcomes following cerebellopontine angle tumor resection

PURPOSE

It is well documented that the interaction between many social factors can affect clinical outcomes. However, the independent effects of economics on outcomes following surgery are not well understood. The goal of this study is to investigate the role socioeconomic status has on postoperative outcomes in a cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumor resection population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over 6 years (07 June 2013 to 24 April 2019), 277 consecutive CPA tumor cases were reviewed at a single, multihospital academic medical center. Patient characteristics obtained included median household income, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), race, BMI, tobacco use, amongst 23 others. Outcomes studied included readmission, ED evaluation, unplanned return to surgery (during and after index admission), return to surgery after index admission, and mortality within 90 days, in addition to reoperation and mortality throughout the entire follow-up period. Univariate analysis was conducted amongst the entire population with significance set at a p value <0.05. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income and univariate analysis conducted between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p value <0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations amongst study variables and identify confounding factors.

RESULTS

Regression analysis of 273 patients did not find household income to be associated with any of the long-term outcomes assessed. Similarly, a Q1 vs Q4 comparison did not yield significantly different odds of outcomes assessed.

CONCLUSION

Although not statistically significant, the odds ratios suggest socioeconomic status may have a clinically significant effect on postsurgical outcomes. Further studies in larger, matched populations are necessary to validate these findings.

Composite score for prediction of 30-day orthopedic surgery outcomes

The LACE+ (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and Emergency department visits in the past 6 months) risk-prediction tool has never been tested in an orthopedic surgery population. LACE+ may help physicians more effectively identify and support high-risk orthopedics patients after hospital discharge. LACE+ scores were retrospectively calculated for all consecutive orthopedic surgery patients (n = 18 893) at a multi-center health system over 3 years (2016-2018). Coarsened exact matching was employed to create "matched" study groups with different LACE+ score quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4). Outcomes were compared between quartiles. In all, 1444 patients were matched between Q1 and Q4 (n = 2888); 2079 patients between Q2 and Q4 (n = 4158); 3032 patients between Q3 and Q4 (n = 6064). Higher LACE+ scores significantly predicted 30D readmission risk for Q4 vs Q1 and Q4 vs Q3 (P < .001). Larger LACE+ scores also significantly predicted 30D risk of ED visits for Q4 vs Q1, Q4 vs Q2, and Q4 vs Q3 (P < .001). Increased LACE+ score also significantly predicted 30D risk of reoperation for Q4 vs Q1 (P = .018), Q4 vs Q2 (P < .001), and Q4 vs Q3 (P < .001).

Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty in Hispanic/Latino Patients: An Updated Nationwide Analysis of Length of Stay, 30-Day Outcomes, and Risk Factors

Background

This study explored recent time trends in length of stay (LOS), 30-day outcomes, and risk factors for adverse events (AEs) pertaining to total hip arthroplasty in the Hispanic and Latino population.

Methods

A total of 4107 Hispanic and Latino patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty between 2011 and 2017 were identified using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Annual trends in LOS and 30-day outcomes (readmission, reoperation, complications, and mortality) were calculated using univariate mixed-effect regression analyses. Risk factors for AEs were determined using multivariate analyses.

Results

Between 2011 and 2017, there was a significant reduction in LOS >2 midnights (67.6% to 29.5%, P < .001) among Hispanic patients, which was similar to that among non-Hispanic white patients and was also accompanied with improvements in comorbidity profiles and shorter operative times. Postoperatively, the annual rates of 30-day outcomes were comparable with those of white patients (P > .05). Chronic kidney disease, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2, and chronic steroid use were the strongest independent predictors for AEs.

Conclusions

In the context of historically lower arthroplasty outcomes among the Hispanic and Latino population, current evidence suggests a receding tide, with annual trends showing significantly shorter LOS and comparable overall 30-day outcomes with whites. Patients with chronic kidney disease, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score >2, and chronic steroid use are at the highest risk for developing 30-day AEs.

The Impact of Household Economics on Short-Term Outcomes in a Posterior Fossa Tumor Population

Background

Disparities exist in medical care and may result in avoidable negative clinical care outcomes for those affected. There remains a paucity in the literature regarding the impact of economic disparities on neurosurgical outcomes.

Methods

A total of 283 consecutive posterior fossa brain tumor resections, excluding cerebellopontine angle tumors, over a six-year period (June 07, 2013, to April 29, 2019) at a single, multihospital academic medical center were analyzed retrospectively. Outcomes evaluated included 30-day readmission and mortality, emergency department (ED) evaluation, unplanned return to surgery within 30 days, and return to surgery after index admission within 30 days. The population was divided into quartiles based on median household income, and univariate analysis was conducted between the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q4) socioeconomic quartiles, with significance set at a p < 0.05. Stepwise regression was conducted to determine the correlations among study variables and identify confounding factors.

Results

Whole population univariate analysis demonstrated lower socioeconomic status (SES) to be correlated with increased mortality within 30 post-operative days and increased return to surgery after index admission. No significant difference was found with regard to 30-day readmission, ED evaluation, unplanned reoperation, or return to surgery after index admission. Decreasing, but not significant, mortality was demonstrated between Q1 and Q4 socioeconomic quartiles.

Conclusions

This study suggests that low SES, when defined by household income, correlates with increased mortality within 30 days and an increased need for return to surgery within 30 days. There may be an opportunity for hospitals and care providers to use SES to proactively identify high-risk patients and test the impact of supports in the post-operative setting.

Prevention of Infection and Disruption of the Pathogen Transfer Chain in Elective Surgery

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused us all to stop our normal activities and consider how we can safely return to caring for our patients. There are many common practices (such as an increased use of personal protective equipment) which we are all familiar with that can be easily incorporated into our daily routines. Other actions, such as cleaning more surfaces with solutions such as dilute povidone iodine or changing the air filtration systems used within operating room theaters, may require more extensive efforts on our behalf. In this article, we have attempted to highlight some of the changes that arthroplasty surgeons may need to instigate when we are able to resume elective joint arthroplasty procedures in an effort to disrupt the chain of pathogen transfer.

Assessing the Impacts of Misclassified Case-Mix Factors on Health Care Provider Profiling: Performance of Dialysis Facilities

Quantitative metrics are used to develop profiles of health care institutions, including hospitals, nursing homes, and dialysis clinics. These profiles serve as measures of quality of care, which are used to compare institutions and determine reimbursement, as a part of a national effort led by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services in the United States. However, there is some concern about how misclassification in case-mix factors, which are typically accounted for in profiling, impacts results. We evaluated the potential effect of misclassification on profiling results, using 20 744 patients from 2740 dialysis facilities in the US Renal Data System. In this case study, we compared 30-day readmission as the profiling outcome measure, using comorbidity data from either the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medical Evidence Report (error-prone) or Medicare claims (more accurate). Although the regression coefficient of the error-prone covariate demonstrated notable bias in simulation, the outcome measure—standardized readmission ratio—and profiling results were quite robust; for example, correlation coefficient of 0.99 in standardized readmission ratio estimates. Thus, we conclude that misclassification on case-mix did not meaningfully impact overall profiling results. We also identified both extreme degree of case-mix factor misclassification and magnitude of between-provider variability as 2 factors that can potentially exert enough influence on profile status to move a clinic from one performance category to another (eg, normal to worse performer).

Total Knee Replacement: The Inpatient-Only List and the Two Midnight Rule, Patient Impact, Length of Stay, Compliance Solutions, Audits, and Economic Consequences

BACKGROUND

In November 2017, CMS finalized the 2018 Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule that removed TKA from the Medicare inpatient-only (IPO) list. This action had significant and unexpected consequences.

METHODS

We looked at 3 levels of the IPO rule impact on TKA for Medicare beneficiaries: a national comparison of FFS inpatient and outpatient classification for 2017 vs 2018; a survey of AAHKS surgeons completed in April 2019; and an in-depth analysis of a large academic medical center experience. An analysis of change in admission classification of patients with TKA over time, number of QIO audits, compliance solutions for the new rule, and cost implications of those compliance solutions were evaluated.

RESULTS

Hospital reimbursement averages $10,122 in an outpatient facility but does not include the physician payment. Average hospital reimbursement in the inpatient setting is $11,760. The difference in hospital reimbursement varies widely (90th percentile decrease, $6725 vs 10th percentile $2048). Physician payments are the same in both settings (avg $1403). Patients with TKA not designated for inpatient admissions are not eligible for bundle payment programs. Patients designated as outpatients are subjected to higher out-of-pocket expenses. Patients may have an annual Medicare Part B Deductible ($185) and a 20% copay as well as prescription and durable medical equipment costs. An AAHKS survey demonstrated that 45.08% were with inpatient designation only, 17.62% were with outpatient designation only, 25.39% were designated as necessary, and 10.1% were designated by the hospital. This survey showed that 66 of 374 (17.65%) patients had undergone a QIO audit as a result of issues with the IPO rule. An evaluation of an AMC demonstrated that since January 1, 2018, 470 of 690 (68.1%) of CMS patients with TKA left in less than 2 midnights. The institution was subjected to 2 QIO audits.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many unintended consequences to the IPO rule application to TKA.

Persistent Racial Disparities in Utilization Rates and Perioperative Metrics in Total Joint Arthroplasty in the U.S.: A Comprehensive Analysis of Trends from 2006 to 2015

BACKGROUND

Trends in racial disparities in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) care have been documented from 1991 to 2008. However, it remains unknown whether numerous national and orthopaedic-specific efforts to reduce these disparities have been successful. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in racial disparities in TJA utilization and perioperative metrics between black and white patients in the U.S. from 2006 to 2015.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) was queried to identify black and white patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 2006 to 2015. Utilization rates, length of stay in the hospital (LOS), discharge disposition, and inpatient complications and mortality were trended over time. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess changes in disparities over time.

RESULTS

From 2006 to 2015, there were persistent white-black disparities in standardized utilization rates and LOS for both TKA and THA (p < 0.001 for all; ptrend > 0.05 for all). Moreover, there were worsening disparities in the rates of discharge to a facility (rather than home) after both TKA (white compared with black: 40.3% compared with 47.2% in 2006 and 25.7% compared with 34.2% in 2015, ptrend < 0.001) and THA (white compared with black: 42.6% compared with 41.7% in 2006 and 23.4% compared with 29.2% in 2015, ptrend < 0.001) and worsening disparities in complication rates after TKA (white compared with black: 5.1% compared 6.1% in 2006 and 3.9% compared with 6.0% in 2015, ptrend < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

There were persistent, and in many cases worsening, racial disparities in TJA utilization and perioperative care between black and white patients from 2006 to 2015 in the U.S. These results were despite national efforts to reduce racial disparities and highlight the need for continued focus on this issue. Although recent work has shown that elimination of racial disparities in TJA care is possible, the present study demonstrates that renewed efforts are still needed on a national level.

Assessment of Hospital Readmissions From the Emergency Department After Implementation of Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

IMPORTANCE

The Medicare Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) is associated with reduced readmission rates, but it is unknown how this decrease occurred.

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether the HRRP was associated with changes in the probability of readmission at emergency department (ED) visits after hospital discharge (ED revisits) overall and depending on whether admission is typically indicated for the patient's condition at the ED revisit.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This retrospective cohort study used hospital and ED discharge data from California, Florida, and New York from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2014. A difference-in-differences analysis examined change in readmission probability at ED revisits for recently discharged patients; ED revisits with clinical presentations for which admission is typically indicated vs those for which admission is more variable (ie, discretionary) were examined separately. Inclusion criteria were Medicare patients 65 years and older who revisited an ED within 30 days of inpatient discharge. Data were analyzed from December 18, 2018, to September 11, 2019.

EXPOSURES

Before and after HRRP implementation among patients initially hospitalized for targeted vs nontargeted conditions.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Thirty-day unplanned hospital readmissions at the ED revisit.

RESULTS

A total of 9 914 068 index hospitalizations were identified in California, Florida, and New York from 2010 to 2014. Of 2 052 096 discharges in 2010, 1 168 126 (56.9%) discharges were women and 566 957 discharges (27.6%) were among patients older than 85 years. Among 1 421 407 patients with an unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge, 1 266 107 patients (89.1%) were admitted through the ED. A total of 1 906 498 ED revisits were identified. After adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics from the index hospitalization, HRRP implementation was associated with fewer readmissions from the ED, with a difference-in-difference estimate of -0.9 (95% CI, -1.4 to -0.4) percentage points (P < .001), or a 1.4% relative decrease from the 65.8% pre-HRRP readmission rates. Implementation of the HRRP was associated with fewer readmissions at the ED revisit involving clinical presentations for which admission is typically indicated (difference-in-differences estimate, -1.1 [95% CI, -1.6 to -0.6] percentage points; P < .001), or a 1.2% relative decrease from the 93.6% pre-HRRP rate. These results appear to be associated with patients presenting at the ED revisit with congestive heart failure (difference-in-difference estimate, -1.2 [95% CI, -2.0 to -0.4] percentage points; P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that implementation of the HRRP was associated with a lower likelihood of readmission for recently discharged patients presenting to the ED, specifically for congestive heart failure. This highlights the critical role of the ED in readmission reduction under the HRRP and suggests that patient outcomes after HRRP implementation should be further studied.

Healthcare disparities among orthopedic trauma patients in the USA: socio-demographic factors influence the management of calcaneus fractures

Background

Socio-demographic factors have been suggested to contribute to differences in healthcare utilization for several elective orthopedic procedures. Reports on disparities in utilization of orthopedic trauma procedures remain limited. The purpose of our study is to assess the roles of clinical and socio-demographic variables in utilization of operative fixation of calcaneus fractures in the USA.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) dataset was used to analyze all patients from 2005 to 2014 with closed calcaneal fractures. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the impact of clinical and socio-demographic variables on the utilization of surgical versus non-surgical treatment.

Results

A total of 17,156 patients with closed calcaneus fractures were identified. Operative treatment was rendered in 7039 patients (41.03%). A multivariate logistic regression demonstrated multiple clinical and socio-demographic factors to significantly influence the utilization of surgical treatment including age, gender, insurance status, race/ethnicity, income, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, psychosis, drug abuse, and alcohol abuse (p <  0.05). In addition, hospital size and hospital type (teaching versus non-teaching) showed a statistically significant difference (p <  0.05).

Conclusions

Besides different clinical variables, we identified several socio-demographic factors influencing the utilization of surgical treatment of calcaneus fractures in the US patient population. Further studies need to identify the specific patient-related, provider-related, and system-related factors leading to these disparities.

RATeS (Re-Admissions in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery): a prospective regional service evaluation of complications and readmissions

INTRODUCTION

All the surgeries carry risks, which may lead to readmission at a later date. At present, there is limited Trauma and Orthopaedic (T&O) specific data in the literature. As a result, a prospective regional service evaluation aimed to discover the current complication and readmission rates across all T&O procedures and identify any factors associated with these outcomes.

METHODS

Data were collected at six sites across Yorkshire and Humber for all T&O procedures during October 2016. Patient demographics and procedure-specific data were collected. Post-operative complications and length of stay were recorded. All the patients were then followed up for 30 days post-discharge to determine if they experienced complications which resulted in readmission and further surgical intervention.

RESULTS

1411 patients having a total of 64 operations were recorded with 1391 completing follow-up (98.5%). Overall in-patient complication rate was 8.4% with the readmission rate being 4.4%. An ASA grade of three or more was found to be associated with readmission. Procedure-related factors such as the use of VTE prophylaxis and prophylactic antibiotics, as well as the elective nature of certain operations were negatively associated with readmission. The largest subgroup of patients was those undergoing total hip (THR) or knee replacements (TKR). For these 234 patients, the readmission rate for TKR and THR being 3.77% and 3.13%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, multi-centre project describes readmission rates following trauma and orthopaedic surgery. In the presented study, the elective nature of the procedure was associated with a reduced risk of readmission.

Hospital Readmission Rates in Medicare Advantage and Traditional Medicare: A Retrospective Population-Based Analysis

BACKGROUND

Medicare's Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program reports risk-standardized readmission rates for traditional Medicare but not Medicare Advantage beneficiaries.

OBJECTIVE

To compare readmission rates between Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study linking the Medicare Provider Analysis and Review (MedPAR) file with the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS).

SETTING

4748 U.S. acute care hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients aged 65 years or older hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (n = 841 613), congestive heart failure (CHF) (n = 1 458 652), or pneumonia (n = 2 020 365) between 2011 and 2014.

MEASUREMENTS

30-day readmissions.

RESULTS

Among admissions for AMI, CHF, and pneumonia identified in MedPAR, 29.2%, 38.0%, and 37.2%, respectively, did not have a corresponding record in HEDIS. Of these, 18.9% for AMI, 23.7% for CHF, and 18.3% for pneumonia resulted in a readmission that was identified in MedPAR. However, among index admissions appearing in HEDIS, 14.4% for AMI, 18.4% for CHF, and 13.9% for pneumonia resulted in a readmission. Patients in Medicare Advantage had lower unadjusted readmission rates than those in traditional Medicare for all 3 conditions (16.6% vs. 17.1% for AMI, 21.4% vs. 21.7% for CHF, and 16.3% vs. 16.4% for pneumonia). However, after standardization, patients in Medicare Advantage had higher readmission rates than patients in traditional Medicare for AMI (17.2% vs. 16.9%; difference, 0.3 percentage point [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.5 percentage point]), CHF (21.7% vs. 21.4%; difference, 0.3 percentage point [CI, 0.2 to 0.5 percentage point]), and pneumonia (16.5% vs. 16.0%; difference, 0.5 percentage point [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.6 percentage point]). Rate differences increased between 2011 and 2014.

LIMITATION

Potential unobserved differences between populations.

CONCLUSION

The HEDIS data underreported hospital admissions for 3 common medical conditions, and readmission rates were higher among patients with underreported admissions. Medicare Advantage beneficiaries had higher risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rates than traditional Medicare beneficiaries.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institute on Aging.

Re-admission patterns in England and the Netherlands: a comparison based on administrative data of all hospitals

BACKGROUND

Examining variation in patterns of re-admissions between countries can be valuable for mutual learning in order to reduce unnecessary re-admissions. The aim of this study was to compare re-admission rates and reasons for re-admissions between England and the Netherlands.

METHODS

We used data from 85 Dutch hospitals (1 355 947 admissions) and 451 English hospitals (5 260 227 admissions) in 2014 (96% of all Dutch hospitals and 100% of all English NHS hospitals). Re-admission data from England and the Netherlands were compared for all hospital patients and for specific diagnosis groups: pneumonia, urinary tract infection, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary atherosclerosis, biliary tract disease, hip fracture and acute myocardial infarction. Re-admissions were categorized using a classification system developed on administrative data. The classification distinguishes between potentially preventable re-admissions and other reasons for re-admission.

RESULTS

England had a higher 30-day re-admission rate (adjusted for age and gender) compared to the Netherlands: 11.17% (95% CI 11.14-11.20%) vs. 9.83% (95% CI 9.77-9.88%). The main differences appeared to be in re-admissions for the elderly (England 17.2% vs. the Netherlands 10.0%) and in emergency re-admissions (England 85.3% of all 30-day re-admissions vs. the Netherlands 66.8%). In the Netherlands, however, more emergency re-admissions were classified as potentially preventable compared to England (33.8% vs. 28.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The differences found between England and the Netherlands indicate opportunities to reduce unnecessary re-admissions. For England this concerns more expanded palliative care, integrated social care and reduction of waiting times. In the Netherlands, the use of treatment plans for daily life could be increased.