Fracture of a BIOLOX Delta Ceramic Femoral Head: A Case Report and Update of the Literature

Fourth-generation Ceramic Head Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review

Ceramics are used in total hip arthroplasty due to inherent wettability and low wear rates, but fracture risk is a known complication. Rates as high as 13.4% were reported in the past, yet as low as 0.02% in newer generations. Howard et al. reported a fracture rate of 0.009% for fourth-generation ceramic heads. We present a case report of a 69-year-old male with a BMI of 40.01 kg/m2 who suffered a fracture of a 36-mm ceramic femoral head with pseudoacetabular involvement of the polyethylene liner. This occurred 2 years and 3 months after his primary surgery after a 4-foot fall off of a ladder. The patient underwent revision of his total hip arthroplasty with arthroplasty of the polyethylene liner and femoral head component without stem explantation.

Why Are Contemporary Primary Ceramic-on-Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasties Failing? An Analysis of Over 5,500 Cases

BACKGROUND

Ceramic-on-highly crosslinked polyethylene (HXLPE) has become the most common bearing surface utilized in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study was to determine the implant survivorship and clinical outcomes of THAs with ceramic-on-HXLPE in a large single-institutional series.

METHODS

We identified 5,536 primary THAs performed from 2007 to 2017 using a ceramic-on-HXLPE bearing through our total joint registry. The mean age was 60 years, 51% were women, and the mean body mass index was 30. A cementless femoral component was used in 98% of cases, and a head size of ≥ 36 was used in 75%. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analyses were completed to assess survivorship free of any revision or reoperation. Clinical outcomes were assessed via Harris Hip Score. The mean follow-up was four years.

RESULTS

The 5-year survivorship free of any revision was 97%. The most common indications for revision were dislocation (41 hips), periprosthetic joint infection (39 hips), and periprosthetic femur fracture (18 hips). The 5-year survivorship free of any reoperation was 96%. There were an additional 70 reoperations, with the most common indications being wound dehiscence (32 hips), iliopsoas impingement (11 hips), and periprosthetic femur fracture (11 hips). There were only two bearing surface failures: one HXLPE liner fractured and one dissociated. There were no ceramic head fractures or failures. The mean Harris Hip Score increased from 57 to 92 (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In over 5,500 THAs completed with modern ceramic-on-HXLPE bearings, failures of the bearing surface were nearly eliminated at midterm follow-up, and overall 5-year survivorship free of revision was excellent. Dislocation, periprosthetic joint infection, and periprosthetic femur fracture were the most common causes of failure. As bearing surfaces have evolved, traditional failure mechanisms such as polyethylene wear, corrosion and metal reactions, and ceramic fractures have become nearly extinct.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Case-Control Study), Therapeutic.

A Very Rare Form of Ceramic Head Fracture in Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty: Unique Experience and Literature Review

Introduction

A fracture of the ceramic head in bipolar hemiarthroplasty using an inner polyliner has not been reported yet, and there seems to be no report of simultaneous breakage of the fourth-generation BIOLOX Delta ceramic head and liner in total hip arthroplasty.

Method

A 44-year-old male patient underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty using a third-generation BIOLOX Forte ceramic head 3 years and 9 months earlier for osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) and visited our hospital due to a ceramic head fracture. Conversion total hip arthroplasty was performed. A 64-year-old female patient underwent total hip arthroplasty using a fourth-generation BIOLOX Delta ceramic head and liner articulation for osteoarthritis of the hip. The ceramic head and liner were fractured during the third dislocation. Ceramic head and liner exchange revision surgery was performed.

Conclusion

When using ceramic bearings, fractures or delamination following trauma can occur, confirming the need to carefully evaluate the condition of the ceramic components in symptomatic patients.

Ceramic fragmentation after total hip arthroplasty: two case reports and literature review

Background

Ceramic fragmentation is a rare but serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). We reviewed the PubMed literature from 1990 to 2023 and found only 31 case reports of ceramic fragmentation after THA. Our case reports help to expand understanding of this rare complication. We shared our surgical experience and identified an ideal material for revision surgery, which can serve as a useful reference for other orthopedic surgeons to perform ceramic fragmentation revision surgery in the future. We also analyzed the possible causes, diagnosis, and treatment opinions of ceramic fragmentation.

Case presentation

This study presents two cases of ceramic fragmentation after THA. One patient had ceramic head fragmentation 10 years after the primary THA, and one patient had ceramic liner fragmentation 5 years after the primary THA. Both patients presented with pain, and one patient also reported a clicking sound in the hip. The two patients described here had BMIs of 23.7 and 23.1, respectively. Both patients' ceramic fragmentation were due to aseptic loosening, not periprosthetic joint infections, as confirmed by negative microbiological cultures. Radiographic examinations of both patients revealed radio-opaque wear debris around the hip joint prostheses and we describe the surgical protocols and intraoperative findings in both cases in detail.

Conclusion

Our cases and the literature suggest that ceramic fragmentation can occur at any time after THA. The most immediate symptoms are pain and noise, but some patients may be asymptomatic. Ceramic on polyethylene bearings is recommended for revision surgery whenever possible; metal bearings should be avoided.

Damage analysis of retrieved BioloxⓇdelta components used in hard and soft bearings

This retrieval study included 43 Biolox delta explants (18 CoC, 25 CoP). Implants were examined macroscopically, whereby damage was evaluated using a semi quantitative scoring system. Confocal microscopy was used to examine wear related damage patterns of the articulating surfaces. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was used to analyze wear marks on the implant surface and wear debris in periprosthetic tissue samples. Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD) were used to quantify monoclinic zirconia fractions. On all components, in vivo wear resulted predominantly in different damage patterns caused by metal transfer. In CoC bearings stripe wear was additionally detected, and some implants underwent severe damage due to component breakage. The wear scores were higher for CoC components, with no differences between the scores for CoC heads and liners. Wear features caused comparable roughening on implants from CoC and CoP bearings. SEM studies demonstrated that most wear marks were caused by metal debris released from implant components. Grain pull-out was observed in stripe wear regions. Monoclinic phase shift was observed in a similar quantity on components from CoP and CoC bearings. The increase of monoclinic zirconia content around metal deposits was minimal and was more pronounced in areas of stripe wear. The results of this study indicate, that ZTA components in general undergo minimal wear in both, CoC and CoP bearings, however, it is more pronounced in the former. Metal deposits, as the most common wear feature, have no significant effect on monoclinic phase transition. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: In this paper, we classify all damage patterns macroscopically according to an established scoring system and assess them regarding surface roughness (confocal microscopy) and monoclinic phase content (Raman spectroscopy) in order to derive the severity for patients. We compare hard-hard and hard-soft bearings and relate damage patterns with metal transfer based on SEM/EDS examinations. Furthermore, we work out correlations between patient-specific data, cause of revision and the physical condition of each individual sample Our cohort consists of 43 Biolox delta retrievals, a comparatively large quantity. In addition, we address current topics such as metal transfer and, based on the classification of damage patterns, provide incentives and/or meaningful focal points for further research.

A case-driven hypothesis for multi-stage crack growth mechanism in fourth-generation ceramic head fracture

BACKGROUND

Ceramic bearings are used in total hip arthroplasty due to their excellent wear behaviour and biocompatibility. The major concern related to their use is material brittleness, which significantly impacts on the risk of fracture of ceramic components. Fracture toughness improvement has contributed to the decrease in fracture rate, at least of the prosthetic head. However, the root cause behind these rare events is not fully understood. This study evaluated head fracture occurrence in a sizeable cohort of patients with fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic implants and described the circumstances reported by patients in the rare cases of head fracture.

METHODS

The clinical survivorship of 29,495 hip prostheses, with fourth-generation ceramic bearings, was determined using data from a joint replacement registry. The average follow-up period was 5.2 years (range 0.1-15.6). Retrieval analysis was performed in one case for which the ceramic components were available.

RESULTS

Clinical outcomes confirmed the extremely low fracture rate of fourth-generation ceramic heads: only two out of 29,495 heads fractured. The two fractures, both involving 36 mm heads, occurred without a concurrent or previous remarkable trauma. Considering the feature of the fractured head, a multi-stage crack growth mechanism has been hypothesized to occur following damage at the head-neck taper interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons must continue to pay attention to the assembly of the femoral head: achieving a proper head seating on a clean taper is a prerequisite to decrease the risk of occurrence of any damage process within head-neck junction, which may cause high stress concentration at the contact surface, promoting crack nucleation and propagation even in toughened ceramics.

Catastrophic intraoperative failure of a ceramic femoral head

Approximately 17 years after a primary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty, a 59-year-old female developed pain, swelling, and weakness in her right hip accompanied by laboratory findings and imaging suggestive of an adverse local tissue reaction. Acetabular revision was performed to upsize the femoral head and improve hip stability. Upon impaction of the new, non-option ceramic femoral head onto the unsleeved retained stem, the head split into two pieces without fragmentation. The surgery was completed using a cobalt-chromium head, which was impacted without issue onto the stem’s taper. Although BIOLOX delta femoral heads do not require titanium sleeves, we believe that careful consideration should be given to their use in revision total hip arthroplasty with ceramic heads, regardless of the extent of trunnion damage noted intraoperatively.

Fracture of a 40-mm BIOLOX Delta Femoral Head

Ceramic bearing surfaces have gained popularity in total hip arthroplasty as a result of the favorable mechanical properties and low wear rates. Despite the recognition as an attractive articulation, problems such as ceramic head fracture persist. Smaller heads and higher body mass indices are touted as risk factors for ceramic head fracture and are often associated with antecedent trauma. We present a case report of an 83-year-old male with a body mass index of 26.7 kg/m² who suffered a fracture of a 40-mm ceramic femoral head. This occurred atraumatically 5 years from his index surgery. This patient underwent revision total hip arthroplasty which included debridement of ceramic debris and alteration of the bearing surface with femoral head and polyethylene liner exchange.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcome of Ceramic-On-Ceramic Bearing Breakage in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing breakage is a rare but significant complication of total hip arthroplasty. This study aimed to identify risk factors for breakage and to determine the outcome of different revision options.

METHODS

All ceramic-on-ceramic primary total hip arthroplasty procedures reported to the Australian Joint Replacement Registry from September 1999 to December 2019 were included. Procedures were subdivided into alumina or mixed ceramic (alumina/zirconia). All breakages were identified. The association between ceramic type and head size was assessed. Subsequent revision rates were compared and cause of revision assessed.

RESULTS

There were 23,534 alumina and 71,144 mixed ceramic procedures. Breakage was the reason for 1^st revision in 84 alumina (5.27% of all revisions and 0.36% of procedures) and 56 mixed ceramic procedures (2.46% of all revisions; 0.08% of procedures). Alumina had a higher breakage rate than mixed ceramic (HR 2.50 (95% CI 1.75, 3.59), P < .001), and breakage was higher for 36-38mm head sizes using alumina (HR 2.84 (1.52, 5.31), P = .001). 17.8% of 2^nd revisions occur by 3 years, due to dislocation, infection, metal-related pathology, and loosening. A neck adapter sleeve did not reduce 2^nd revisions. Numbers were too low to compare revision bearing surface options.

CONCLUSION

Ceramic breakage has reduced with mixed ceramics but has a 0.79/1000 incidence at 15-year follow-up. It is unclear what the risk factors are for modern ceramics with increasing head size a risk for alumina only. Risk of 2^nd revision is high and occurs early. The optimal revision option is unknown.

Zirconia-Toughened Alumina Coated Ti6Al4V via Additive Manufacturing

CoCr alloy-based femoral heads have failed prematurely due to galvanic-induced corrosion when coupled with a titanium hip stem. Coupling a titanium based-femoral head with the titanium hip stem is ideal in addressing this failure mode. Ti6Al4V (Ti64) alloy was reinforced with zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA) by directed-energy deposition (DED)-based additive manufacturing (AM) to address that concern. Preliminary materials processing work resulted in failed samples due to cracking, porosity, and delamination. After careful parameter optimization, a Ti64+5wt.%ZTA (5ZTA) composition produced a metallurgically sound and coherent interface, minimal porosity, and bulk structures. Hardness was observed to increase by 27%, normalized wear rate reduced by 25%, and contact resistance increased during in vitro tribological testing along with faster surface re-passivation.

Fourth generation head fracture in ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing after hip revision surgery: a case report

Fourth generation ceramic bearings (BIOLOX delta, CeramTec AG; Phlochingen, Germany) were developed to reduce wear debris and improve fracture resistance. A case of a fourth generation head fracture in ceramic-on-polyethylene (COP) coupling after hip revision surgery is reported. A 58-year-old man was admitted to our department for increasing hip pain following a direct trauma which occurred during skiing activity 4 months before. Six years earlier, he had undergone a right cementless revision surgery with a 36-mm BIOLOX delta femoral head on polyethylene liner for metallosis and foreign body reaction after primary total hip replacement for hip osteoarthritis. At admission, radiological evaluation revealed a fracture of ceramic femoral head requiring a new revision surgery. Extensive synovectomy, lavage and capsulectomy were performed. Both acetabular cup and femoral stem were well fixed with no damage of trunnion, and therefore they were retained. A 36-mm internal diameter polyethylene acetabular liner was inserted along a 36-mm BIOLOX delta head with a BioBall adapter XL. The postoperative course was uncomplicated. At 1-year follow-up, the patient had a complete functional recovery. To our knowledge, BIOLOX delta ceramic femoral head fracture after COP hip revision surgery has not been previously reported.