Differences in short-term complications between spinal and general anesthesia for primary total knee arthroplasty

Periarticular injection versus placebo in total knee arthroplasty with intrathecal morphine

INTRODUCTION

Periarticular injection (PAI) is one part of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) multimodal analgesia protocols. PAI combined with neuraxial anesthesia including intrathecal morphine (ITM) has not been previously investigated. This study prospectively compares PAI to placebo injection in patients undergoing TKA under spinal anesthesia with ITM.

METHODS

We performed a prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing immediate postoperative outcomes after TKA. All patients received combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia with ITM and multimodal analgesia. The study group received a standardized PAI with 0.5% ropivacaine, clonidine, ketorolac, and epinephrine, while the control group received PAI with saline. Exclusion criteria were revision surgery, inability to receive epidural anesthesia or PAI, patients taking greater than 80 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) daily prior to surgery, and lack of patient consent to participate in the study.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients enrolled and completed the study from 2015 to 2021. Thirty-four were randomized to the study group and 30 to the control. There was no difference in mean total postoperative opioid consumption between PAI (125.49 MME) and control (138.80 MME); (p = 0.556). There was also no difference in opioid requirements at 0-24 and 24-48 h between PAI (58.87 and 70.57 MME), and control (70.57 and 69.72 MME); (p = 0.308 and p = 0.556).

CONCLUSION

This study, while underpowered, demonstrates that PAI does not significantly decrease opioid consumption after TKA compared to placebo injection when utilizing ITM spinal anesthesia. When ITM is used, PAI may be reasonably be excluded from the protocol without affecting opioid requirements.

Impact of anesthesia type on postoperative pain and outcomes in primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a retrospective register analysis

BACKGROUND

This study explores the effects of single-sided spinal versus general anesthesia on patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty within a fast-track surgery environment. Although many studies suggest better outcomes with neuraxial anesthesia in lower extremity joint replacement, its benefits in fast-track surgery remain unclear.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on data derived from 283 patients. We focused on patients who had undergone primary, elective, and unilateral endoprosthetic fast-track hip or knee joint replacement surgeries between May 15, 2019, and November 30, 2020. The primary objective was to ascertain the correlation between the type of anesthesia and several postoperative parameters, including pain intensity, analgesia requirements, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, perioperative process times, and hospital length of stay, based on the collected data.

RESULTS

Our findings indicated no difference in pain intensity and patient satisfaction between the general (n = 195) and single-sided spinal anesthesia (n = 61) groups at the first postoperative day. However, a notable difference was observed in the recovery room, with patients under spinal anesthesia requiring significantly less piritramide than those after general anesthesia. Both groups had a similar incidence of postoperative nausea and length of hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

When analyzed retrospectively, the type of anesthesia applied is not associated with an increased risk of postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting, or prolonged hospital stay. Overall, neither anesthesia method outperforms the other concerning patient satisfaction, emphasizing the importance of patient preference and individual risk factors in the decision-making process.

Same-Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty: Hospital Demonstrates Similar Outcomes to Ambulatory Surgery Center in a More Complex Patient Population

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes between patients undergoing same-day discharge (SDD) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) versus a tertiary care university hospital setting.

METHODS

A single tertiary academic center's institutional database was reviewed for patients who underwent primary TKA and were discharged the same day from August 2021 to January 2024. Patients who did not have at least 1 year of follow-up were excluded. Patient demographics, comorbidities, patient-reported outcome measures, emergency department visits, admissions, reoperations, and revisions were collected. Patients were stratified by the location of their surgery: ASC versus hospital. Specific criteria had to be met prior to surgery at the ASC, and the final decision regarding the location of surgery was made via shared decision-making between the patient and their surgeon. Patients who did not meet ASC criteria underwent TKA at the main hospital. Univariable analyses were used to compare groups, and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine if surgical location was a significant factor. Of the 449 TKAs meeting inclusion criteria, 63.3% (284) were performed at the ASC and 36.7% (165) at the university hospital at a mean follow-up of 1.51 years (range, 1.00 to 2.40). Of those 165 whose surgery was done at the hospital, 93.9% met at least one ASC exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Patients whose TKA was done at the hospital had significantly higher weight (P = 0.003), body mass index (P < 0.001), Elixhauser comorbidity index (P < 0.001), proportion of patients who had an American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of 3 (P = 0.023), and proportion of patients who required general anesthesia (P < 0.001). Additionally, patients whose TKA was done at the hospital had higher preoperative patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) (62.0 [59.0, 66.0] versus 63.0 [61.8, 67.0]; P = 0.006), and lower physical function (PF) (39.0 [36.0, 43.0] versus 38.0 [34.0, 41.0]; P = 0.001). At 1 year, however, patients in both groups had similar PROMIS PI (53.0 [49.0, 59.0] versus 54.0 [44.0, 59.0]; P = 0.785) and PROMIS PF (47.0 [42.0, 51.0] versus 47.0 [41.0, 50.0]; P = 0.422) scores as well as similar rates of achieving minimum clinically important difference for PROMIS PI (64.4 versus 71.4%; P = 0.336) and PROMIS PF (60.5 versus 71.4%; P = 0.124). They also had a similar number of emergency department visits and admissions at 30 and 90 days, as well as similar reoperation-free (92.0 versus 93.3%; P = 0.79) and revision-free (95.5 versus 99.4%; P = 0.59) survival at 2 years CONCLUSIONS: Although ASCs have strict patient criteria for SDD TKA, complex patients at a tertiary university hospital can be sent home the same day with equivalent outcomes. Therefore, unhealthier patients can safely achieve SDD without compromising outcomes if done in the appropriate setting.

The evolution of anesthetic management for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients: A hospital network experience

Introduction

In the face of an ongoing opioid epidemic and an aging population, the utilization of a successful multimodal pain regimen in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is vital. This study looks to explore the effect of different types of anesthesia in addition to a multimodal pain regimen on post-operative outcomes after undergoing TKA.

Materials and methods

From January 2016 to December 2022, 783 charts of patients undergoing an elective TKA were reviewed. Patients undergoing primary, isolated, and unilateral TKA procedures were included. Patients were grouped into three study arms: 1) general anesthesia (GA); 2) general anesthesia with a local anesthetic adductor canal block (GA + ACB); 3) spinal anesthesia with local anesthetic adductor canal block (SA + ACB). Patients who received other anesthesia types or received ACB utilizing liposomal bupivacaine were excluded.

Results

Of the 420 included patients, 63 patients received GA, 148 GA + ACB, and 209 SA + ACB. Patients in the SA + ACB group had a shorter LOS compared to both the GA + ACB and GA groups (p < 0.01. The SA + ACB group had the lowest daily average OME requirement (p < 0.01). Finally, patients in the SA + ACB group had the lowest average total cost of $11,683.91 (p < 0.01).

Discussion

Spinal anesthesia with adductor canal block is effective in decreasing opioid usage and improving postoperative outcomes after TKA. Surgeons and anesthesiologists should look to utilize this anesthetic option along with a multimodal regimen when deciding how to best manage postoperative pain after TKA procedures.

Level of evidence

Level III.

The Use of General Anesthesia in Revision Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that spinal anesthesia gives superior outcomes for primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA). However, there is a lack of available data regarding contemporary general anesthesia (GA) approaches for revision TJA utilized at high-volume joint arthroplasty centers.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a series of 850 consecutive revision TJAs (405 revision total hip arthroplasties and 445 revision total knee arthroplasties) performed over 4 years at a single institution that uses a contemporary GA protocol and reported on the lengths of stay, early recovery rates, perioperative complications, and readmissions.

RESULTS

Of the revision arthroplasty patients, 74.4% (632 of 850) were discharged on postoperative day 1 and 68.5% (582 of 850) of subjects were able to participate in physical therapy on the day of surgery. Only 6 patients (0.7%) required an intensive care unit stay postoperatively. The 90-day readmission rate over this time was 11.3% (n = 96), while the reoperation rate was 9.4% (n = 80).

CONCLUSIONS

While neuraxial anesthesia is commonly preferred when performing revision TJA, we have demonstrated favorable safety and efficiency metrics utilizing GA in conjunction with contemporary enhanced recovery pathways. Our data support the notion that modern GA techniques can be successfully used in revision TJA.

Morbidity and Mortality Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal anesthetic mode in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has yet to be clearly identified. Patients undergoing TJA may recieve spinal anesthesia (SA) or general anesthesia (GA). While arthroplasty literature indicates differences in postoperative morbidity, hip fracture literature does not show clear superiority of SA or GA. The purpose of this study was to further investigate this relationship and determine if there is a significant difference in morbidity and mortality between GA and SA in patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA from February 2007 to February 2021 were retrospectively reviewed, creating four cohorts: THA/GA (n = 1,266), THA/SA (n = 1,084), TKA/GA (n = 882), and THA/SA (n = 2,067). Readmission within 90 days, mortality within 365 days, and thromboembolic events within 30 days postoperatively were compared using logistic regression, controlling for age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

RESULTS

The odds of experiencing a deep venous thrombosis within 30 days postoperatively were elevated in the analysis of both the THA/GA (odds ratio (OR) = 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.5 to 7.0; P = .004) and the TKA/GA (OR = 1.9; 95% CI: 1.2 to 3.0; P = .005) groups. Similarly, the risk of pulmonary embolism as higher in the THA/GA cohort (OR = 3.9; 95% CI: 1.2 to 17.3; P = .04). There were also higher odds of mortality within 365 days postoperatively in THA/GA patients (OR = 4.3; 95% CI: 1.7 to 13.0; P = .004). No other differences existed among TKA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based upon these data, both SA and GA are reasonable options for primary TKA with similar risk profiles. However, GA may be associated with higher rates of deep venous thrombosis in TJA and pulmonary embolism in THA. General anesthesia (GA) was also loosely associated with increased mortality within 1 year of THA, but this result should be considered with caution.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Two Decades of Research

Racial disparities in outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain persistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to comprehensively synthesize data between 2000-2020. An electronic search of studies was performed on PubMed, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library databases from January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2020. Random effects models were used to report unadjusted and adjusted estimates for a comprehensive list of care outcomes in TKA. 63 studies met PRISMA criteria. Black patients report greater odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.00-1.59 (p = 0.049); adjusted OR [aOR]: 1.34, 95% CI: 1.09-1.64), in-hospital complications (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.27-1.35), 30-day complications (aOR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.07-1.33), infection (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.16; aOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.16-1.46), bleeding (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.03-1.71; aOR: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.23-1.75), peripheral vascular events (PVE) (aOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.11-1.92), length of stay (LOS) (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.08-1.34), extended-LOS (aOR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.53-2.33), discharge disposition (OR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.29-1.96; aOR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.70-2.25), 30-day (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.13-1.27; aOR: 1.17 95% CI: 1.09-1.26) and 90-day (OR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.17-1.82) readmission compared to White patients. Disparities in bleeding, extended-LOS, discharge disposition, PVE, and 30-day readmission were observed in Asian patients. Hispanic patients experienced disparities in extended LOS and discharge disposition, while Native-American patients had disparities in bleeding outcomes. Persistent racial disparities in TKA outcomes highlight a need for standardized outcome measures and comprehensive data collection across multiple racial groups to ensure greater healthy equity.

Utility of spinal anesthesia in plastic surgery and other surgical subspecialties: A literature review

INTRODUCTION

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is commonly used within the specialties of orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, spine surgery, and general surgery, and offers several benefits over general anesthesia (GA). However, SA is used much less frequently in plastic surgery. This review analyzed currently existing data on SA use across various surgical specialties and compared the benefits and complications of SA to those of GA, to assess its utility and potential for more widespread use in plastic surgery.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to evaluate the utility of SA in plastic surgery. Indications, contraindications, and data on the use of SA across various surgical specialties were reviewed. Benefits, complications, and cost-effectiveness were also assessed. Finally, the utility of SA in plastic surgery was evaluated based on the available literature.

RESULTS

SA has been shown to yield several benefits and fewer risks than GA, including a higher possibility of early discharge, decreased costs, better pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting control, and decreased risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

Although commonly used for procedures across various surgical specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology, urology, and orthopedic surgery, SA is less frequently used within plastic surgery. Plastic surgery procedures that would benefit from the use of SA include those below the umbilicus such as liposuction, lower extremity procedures, and perineal procedures, and owing to its benefits, we recommend that SA be used more often within plastic surgery under appropriate clinical circumstances.

Sleep Apnea is Not an Obstacle for Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Up to 25% of patients requiring hip or knee arthroplasty have sleep apnea (SA), and these patients have historically been excluded from outpatient programs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate same-day discharge failure as well as 30-day complications, readmissions, and unexpected visits.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study comparing patients who have and do not have SA matched for age, sex and arthroplasty type (total hip arthroplasty, total knee arthroplasty, unicompartimental knee arthroplasty) who underwent primary outpatient surgery between February 2019 and December 2022 in 2 academic hospitals was conducted. Cases with mild SA, moderate SA with a body mass index (BMI) <35, and SA of all severity treated by continuous positive airway pressure machines were eligible. There were 156 patients included (78 cases). Complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complication Index. Continuous variables were evaluated by Student's T or Mann-Whitney tests, while categorical data were analyzed by Chi-square or Fisher tests. Univariate analyses were performed to determine discharge failure risk factors.

RESULTS

There were 6 cases (7.7%) and 5 controls (6.4%) who failed to be discharged on surgery day (P = .754), with postoperative hypoxemia (6, [3.8%]) and apnea periods (3, [1.9%]) being the most common causes. Higher BMI (odds ratio = 1.19, P = .013) and general anesthesia (odds ratio = 11.97, P = .004) were found to be risk factors for discharge failure. No difference was observed on 30-day readmissions (P = .497), unexpected visits (P = 1.000), and complications on the Clavien-Dindo Classification (P > .269) and Comprehensive Complication Index (P > .334) scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Selected patients who have SA can safely undergo outpatient hip or knee arthroplasty. Higher BMI and general anesthesia increased the odds of same-day discharge failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Case-control Study.

IPACK Block Efficacy for Acute Pain Management after Total Knee Replacement: A Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients often experience a significant degree of knee pain following total knee replacement (TKR). To alleviate this pain, nerve blocks may be performed such as the adductor canal block (ACB). However, ACBs are unable to relieve pain originating from the posterior region of the knee. A new type of nerve block known as the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with ACBs as it is designed to inhibit nerve branches innervating this area. In this article, we examine the rationale behind the IPACK procedure, how it is performed, and clinical trials examining its efficacy.

RECENT FINDINGS

5 of the 7 clinical trials examined in this article showed the IPACK + ACB block to show superior efficacy in treating pain following TKR compared to other blocks. These blocks included PMDI+ACB, SPANK+ACB, PAI+ACB, ACB alone, and SCAB. 2 of the 7 clinical trials showed the IPACK + ACB to be less effective in managing patients pain following TKR compared to other blocks which included the CACB and 4 in 1 block. In most instances, the IPACK + ACB showed superior efficacy in managing patients' pain following TKR when compared to other types of nerve blocks. This was determined by measuring usage of opioids, reported postoperative pain, and length of hospital stays following TKR. Thus, we suppose the IPACK block may be used in conjunction with the ACB to effectively reduce patient's pain following TKR.

Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The quality of postoperative analgesia in total knee arthroplasty is crucial for patient recovery, rehabilitation, and hospital stay duration. In line with the above, а single-shot adductor canal block has been considered as an improved method over continuous femoral nerve block. However, continuous adductor canal block and single-shot femoral nerve block have been not adequately addressed in the discussion. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of various types of adductor and femoral nerve blocks on clinically relevant outcomes in patients following total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted following "PRISMA-NMA" and Cochrane Handbook guidelines. The eligibility criteria included randomized trials and, where these were lacking for a comparison, nonrandomized studies involving adults undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty, comparing single-shot adductor canal block, continuous adductor canal block, single-shot femoral nerve block, and continuous femoral nerve block.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies involving 3308 patients were included. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores and opioid consumption but better functional recovery at 24 h compared with continuous femoral nerve block. However, this trend vanishes by the 48 h assessment postsurgery. Continuous adductor canal block required higher opioid consumption but better functional recovery and shorter hospital stay compared with continuous femoral nerve block. Single-shot adductor canal block showed higher pain scores but comparable opioid consumption and functional recovery to continuous adductor canal block.

DISCUSSION

The shift from continuous femoral nerve block to single-shot adductor canal block as the preferred method for pain relief after total knee arthroplasty may be premature. While the latter improves mobility, it falls short in pain control and does not shorten hospital stays. Continuous adductor canal block shows promise but is currently underappreciated, and single-shot femoral nerve block is often overshadowed by other techniques in regional anesthesia. Further high-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these findings.

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Matched-Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia is the predominant regimen in outpatient total joint arthroplasty (TJA), but induction often is unsuccessful, unobtainable, or against patient preference. We compared outcomes of same-day discharge (SDD) TJA with spinal versus general anesthesia in a free-standing ambulatory surgery center (ASC).

METHODS

We took 105 general anesthesia TJA and one-to-one nearest-neighbor matched them to 105 spinal anesthesia TJA over 7 years at 1 ASC. The rate of successful SDD, minutes to discharge, postoperative pain and nausea, and 90-day complications were compared. Postanesthesia care unit outcomes were additionally stratified by spinal anesthetic (mepivacaine versus bupivacaine).

RESULTS

All spinal anesthetic patients underwent SDD compared with 103 (98%) general anesthetic patients (P = .498). Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia patients spent the fewest minutes in postanesthesia care unit prior to discharge from the facility (206), followed by general anesthesia (227), and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia (291; P < .001). General anesthesia patients had the highest levels of pain at 1 hour (5.2 versus 1.5 versus 1.5) and 2 hours (3.2 versus 2.0 versus 1.3) postoperatively, and rates of nausea (48 versus 22 versus 28%) compared with mepivacaine and bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, respectively. The 90-day complications (6 versus 7), admissions (1 versus 3), and reoperations (5 versus 2) were similar among spinal and general anesthesia, respectively (P ≥ .445).

CONCLUSIONS

Both spinal and general anesthesia led to reliable SDD with similar 90-day complication rates. General anesthesia facilitated faster discharge from the ASC compared with bupivacaine spinal anesthesia but led to higher levels of pain and incidence of nausea postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3, Retrospective Cohort Comparison.

Methodological Assessment of the 100 Most-Cited Articles in Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Last Decade Compared to the All-Time List

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been driven by a growing focus on evidence-based medicine. This transition is reflected in the critical appraisal of both, the quality of work and the potential impact on the orthopedic community. The purpose of our study was to (1) identify the top 100 most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade and from all-time, and (2) compare methodological rigor of the most-cited articles in TKA in the last decade to articles all-time by level of evidence.

METHODS

The top 100 cited articles were recorded for manuscripts from the last decade, January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2022, and manuscripts from all-time for TKA. We collected authors, year of publication, journal of the article, country of origin of authors, article type (basic science article, clinical research article), level of evidence, methodological index for non-randomized studies score, physiotherapy evidence database scale, and citation density (total citations/years published).

RESULTS

The largest number of studies for all-time TKA (53.0%) and decade TKA (42.0%) were Level III. The average methodological index for non-randomized studies score for comparative studies was 18.7 for all-time TKA and 20.7 for decade TKA (P < .001). The average physiotherapy evidence database score was 6.1 for all-time TKA and 8.1 for decade TKA (P > .05). The highest citation density for all-time TKA was 111 and for past decade was 63. The number of level II studies in TKA increased from 19.0% from all time to 38.0% from the last decade (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings of improved methodologies over time reflect positive steps toward evidence-based practice in TKA. A continued focus on producing methodologically sound studies may guide evidence-based clinical decision-making.

Substantial Improvement in Self-Reported Mental Health Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Occurs Independent of Anesthetic Technique

BACKGROUND

The influence of anesthetic type on mental health after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is poorly understood. Adverse effects of general anesthesia (GA) on cognition following major non-cardiac surgery are well known, but mental health following THA is less well-studied. We hypothesized that neuraxial anesthesia (NA) would provide favorable mental health profiles compared with GA after THA.

METHODS

Prospectively collected Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 (PROMIS) Global Mental Health (GMH) scores at preoperative baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months after THA were accessed on 4,353 patients in the Pulmonary Embolism Prevention After HiP and KneE Replacement (PEPPER) Trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02810704). Anesthesia was categorized as: general (GA), neuraxial (NA), and neuraxial with peripheral block (NAP). The GMH was assessed longitudinally and compared between groups.

RESULTS

Postoperative GMH improved (P < .05) over preoperative in every anesthetic group. Groups receiving NA had higher baseline GMH scores. Improvement in GMH was diminished after GA alone and plateaued after 1 month. Adding NA or peripheral nerve block to GA conferred additional benefit to GMH improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-perceived mental health improves significantly after THA regardless of anesthetic type. Patients who have higher baseline GMH scores more commonly received NA, likely due to nonsurgical care determinants; these differences in mental wellness persisted at follow-up. Adjunctive NA or peripheral nerve block favored GMH improvement, whereas solitary GA diminished GMH improvement, which plateaued after 1 month. Substantial mental health benefits of THA may overshadow subtle differences in GMH attributable to anesthetic type.

Administration of Low-dose Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in the Setting of Outpatient Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

With the rise of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), rapid motor and sensory recovery after anesthesia is crucial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia (SA) for patients undergoing outpatient arthroplasty.

METHODS

Data were reviewed from a single ASC from 2018 to 2020 for two arthroplasty-trained surgeons for all patients with primary arthroplasties that had administration of low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. Data collected from the ASC records were then further evaluated for total spinal block time, length of blockade, time to discharge criteria, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and time to discharge.

RESULTS

Two hundred twenty-seven patients undergoing 244 primary arthroplasties received SA with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. The volume of 0.75% bupivacaine varied: 115 patients received 0.8 mL (6 mg), 111 patients received 1.0 mL (7.5 mg), and 17 patients received 1.2 mL (9 mg). Total SA time averaged 144 minutes with a mean of 30 minutes from post anesthesia care unit arrival to motor recovery. The mean time from post anesthesia care unit arrival to discharge criteria was 89 minutes. The average VAS at discharge was 1.44; the average VAS on POD1 was 3.0. No episodes of urinary retention and no reports of transient neurologic symptoms were noted in the study population.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose, single-shot hyperbaric bupivacaine SA is an effective option in the ASC for arthroplasty, providing a fast return of motor function, facilitating rapid discharge, and is safe with a relatively low-risk profile.

Less Induction Time and Postoperative Pain Using Spinal Anesthesia Versus General Anesthesia With or Without the Use of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to analyze anesthetic induction time and postoperative pain using spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia with or without the use of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) in total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that spinal anesthesia would be beneficial with respect to induction time and postoperative pain and that PNBs would complement this effect.

METHODS

Patients were stratified according to demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system (ASA), and opioid intake and divided into: (A) general anesthesia without PNB; (B) general anesthesia with PNB; (C) spinal anesthesia without PNB; and (D) spinal anesthesia with PNB. Endpoints were anesthetic induction time, opioid consumption, and pain. Of 559 patients, 348 (62.3%) received general anesthesia (consisting of group A with 46 and group B with 302 patients), and 211 (37.7%) spinal anesthesia (consisting of group C with 117 and group D with 94 patients).

RESULTS

We observed significantly lower total opioid intake 48 hours postoperative when applying spinal anesthesia by 2.08 mg (P < .05) of intravenous morphine-equivalent, and a reduction of 7.0 minutes (P < .05) until skin incision. The application of a PNB achieved a reduction of piritramide intake of 3.59 mg (P < .05) 48 hours postoperative and lengthened induction time by 8.5 minutes (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Statistically shorter anesthetic induction times without clinical relevance, but lower postoperative opioid dosages with clinical relevance were observed for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia. The additional application of PNBs led to a lower need for opioids and lower pain levels in the early postoperative phase.

Does spinal anesthesia for total hip or knee arthroplasty entail longer operating room occupancy compared to general anesthesia? Case-control study of 337 spinal versus 243 general anesthesias

BACKGROUND

Treatment protocols, including anesthesia, are constantly progressing to improve rapid early postoperative recovery in lower-limb arthroplasty. To the best of our knowledge, however, no studies compared general versus spinal anesthesia (GA vs. SA) in the surgical pathway of patients undergoing total knee or hip arthroplasty (TKA, THA). Better knowledge of the processes should improve efficacy in theater and optimize surgical planning. The present study comparing GA and SA in the operating room aimed to assess (1) theater occupancy times, and (2) times for each step in a surgery day according to type of anesthesia.

HYPOTHESIS

SA leads to longer theater occupancy than GA in TKA and THA.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective case-control study analyzed data for the period January 2019 to December 2020 in 303 TKAs (100 GA, 203 SA) and 277 THAs (143 GA, 134 SA), comparing times for all perioperative steps and particularly theater occupancy.

RESULTS

In TKA, occupancy did not differ between GA and SA: 98±16min versus 98±14min respectively; Δ=0min (p=0.78). In THA, occupancy was shorter with SA than GA: 117±23min versus 123±26min respectively; Δ=-6min (p=0.02). In THA, time to perform SA was longer than induction of GA: 28±13min versus 23±12min respectively; Δ=+5min (p<0.001). In TKA, time to leaving the operating room was shorter with SA than GA: 8±5min versus 14±7min respectively; Δ=-6min (p<0.001).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

SA did not involve longer mean theater occupancy than GA for TKA, and reduced it by 6minutes for THA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; case-control study.

Comparison of Pneumonia and Major Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty With Spinal Versus General Anesthesia: A Propensity-matched Cohort Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Spinal anesthesia (SA) allows total joint arthroplasty to be done while minimizing opioids and systemic anesthetic agents compared with general anesthesia (GA). SA has been associated with shortened postoperative recovery; however, the relationship between SA, major postoperative complications, and pneumonia (PNA) remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients in a large, national database who underwent total hip arthroplasty or total knee arthroplasty from 2010 to 2020 were identified. 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create matched groups of patients who underwent SA and GA. The groups were matched by age, sex, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification. 1:1 matching was also done among the ASA classifications as a subanalysis.

RESULTS

Overall, equally matched groups of 217,267 patients who underwent SA versus GA were identified. 850 patients (0.39%) developed postoperative PNA after GA versus 544 patients (0.25%) after SA ( P < 0.001). The risk of major complications was 6,922 (3.2%) in the GA group and 5,401 (2.5%) in the SA group ( P < 0.001). Similarly, the risk of unplanned postoperative reintubation was higher (0.18% versus 0.10%, P < 0.001) and mortality was higher (0.14% versus 0.09%, P < 0.001) in the GA group than in the SA group. In ASA 1 to 3 patients, the risk of PNA was 0.08% to 0.21% higher with GA than with SA. In ASA 4 patients, the risk of PNA was 0.42% higher in SA than in GA (1.92% versus 1.5%, P < 0.001) and the mortality rate was nearly doubled in GA than in SA (1.46% versus 0.77%, P = 0.017).

DISCUSSION

Overall, GA was associated with a small but markedly higher rate of major complications, mortality, and PNA than SA in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty when matching for differences in comorbidities. ASA 4 patients experienced the greatest increase in absolute risk of mortality with GA versus SA.

Regional versus general anesthesia in knee arthroplasty in patients with different classes of BMI: A matched analysis of the NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Knee arthroplasty for knee arthritis is a commonly performed surgery yielding excellent functional results and good pain relief. It is associated with post-surgical complications according to the type of anesthesia and BMI class.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database for the years 2005-2012 for patients >18 years of age who underwent knee arthroplasty, condyle and plateau, medial and/or lateral compartment. The surgical site complications, bleeding occurrences necessitating transfusion, unplanned readmissions, and mortality stratified according to anesthesia type and BMI class over a period of 30-days were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 78,275 patients were included for analysis; regional anesthesia showed a consistent protective effect from surgical site complications more prominent with increasing obesity class with respective ORs and their corresponding 95% CI for pre-obesity, class I, II, and III obesity being 0.95 [0.89-1.09], 0.75 [0.68-0.83], 0.64 [0.57-0.72], and 0.61 [0.54-0.7].

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BMI values are a protective factor for the risk of bleeding requiring transfusion in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Moreover, regional anesthesia is the preferred choice of anesthesia as well if postoperative complications are considered. A significant decrease in the rate of post-operative blood transfusions was seen in patients with high BMI and regional anesthesia.

Spinal anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia (SAGA) on recovery after hip and knee arthroplasty: A study protocol for three randomized, single-blinded, multi-centre, clinical trials

Mobilisation difficulties, due to muscle weakness, and urinary retention are common reasons for prolonged admission following hip and knee arthroplasty procedures. Whether spinal anaesthesia is detrimental to early mobilisation is controversial. Previous studies have reported differences in post-operative recovery between spinal anaesthesia and general anaesthesia; however, up-to-date comparisons in fast-track setups are needed. Our randomized, single-blinded, multi-centre, clinical trials aim to compare the post-operative recovery after total hip (THA), total knee (TKA), and unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKA) respectively when using either spinal anaesthesia (SA) or general anaesthesia (GA) in a fast-track setup. Included patients (74 THA, 74 TKA, and 74 UKA patients) are randomized (1:1) to receive either SA (2 mL 0.5% Bupivacaine) or GA (Induction: Propofol 1.0-2.0 mg/kg iv with Remifentanil 3-5 mcg/kg iv. Infusion: Propofol 3-5 mg/kg/h and Remifentanil 0.5 mcg/kg/min iv). Patients undergo standard primary unilateral hip and knee arthroplasty procedures in an optimized fast-track setup with intraoperative local infiltrative analgesia in TKA and UKA, post-operative multimodal opioid sparing analgesia, immediate mobilisation with full weightbearing, no drains and in-hospital only thromboprophylaxis. Data will be collected on the day of surgery and until patients are discharged. The primary outcome is the ability to be safely mobilised during a 5-m walking test within 6 h of surgery. Secondary outcomes include fulfilment of discharge criteria, post-operative pain, dizziness, and nausea as well as patient reported recovery and opioid related side effects. Data will also be gathered on all hospital contacts within 30-days of surgery. This study will offer insights into advantages and disadvantages of anaesthetic methods used in fast-track arthroplasty surgery.

Impact of spinal Anaesthesia versus general Anaesthesia on the incidence of surgical site infections after knee or hip arthroplasty: A meta-analysis

Postoperative Surgical Site Infections (SSIs) pose significant challenges to recovery after joint arthroplasty. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to compare the incidence of SSIs after knee or hip arthroplasty under Spinal Anaesthesia (SA) versus general anaesthesia (GA). We conducted the systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines, analysing data from 15 studies selected from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library up to May 16, 2023. The analysis included studies comparing SSIs incidence in patients aged 18 years and above who underwent knee or hip arthroplasty under SA or GA. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. The effect size was calculated using random or fixed-effects models based on the observed heterogeneity. We assessed the heterogeneity between studies and conducted a sensitivity analysis. Of 1651 initially identified studies, 15 articles encompassing 353 169 patients were included in the final analysis. A total of 156 405 patients were under SA, while 196 764 received GA. The studies demonstrated substantial heterogeneity (p = 0.007, I2  = 53.7%), resulting in a random-effects model being employed. Patients receiving SA showed a 23% lower likelihood of developing SSIs postoperatively compared to GA patients (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70-0.86, p < 0.001). Sub-group analysis further confirmed these findings regardless of the type of joint arthroplasty. This meta-analysis indicated a significantly lower incidence of SSIs following knee or hip arthroplasty under SA compared to GA. Despite observed heterogeneity, the results underscore the potential benefit of SA over GA in orthopaedic surgeries to reduce the risk of SSIs.

Multicenter, prospective cohort study: immediate postoperative gains in active range of motion following robotic-assisted total knee replacement compared to a propensity-matched control using manual instrumentation

BACKGROUND

Range of motion (ROM) following total knee replacement (TKR) has been associated with patient satisfaction and knee function, and is also an early indicator of a successful procedure. Robotic-assisted TKR (raTKR) is considered to reproduce more precise resections, and, as a result, may be associated with improved early patient satisfaction compared to manual TKR (mTKR). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early postoperative active ROM (aROM) between raTKR and mTKR.

METHODS

A total of 216 mTKR patients were propensity-matched, in terms of age, gender, comorbidities, and BMI, to 216 raTKR cases. Intraoperative and immediate postoperative adverse events were collected. Knee flexion and extension aROM were measured preoperatively and at one- and three months after operation.

RESULTS

Changes in flexion aROM were significantly greater in raTKR vs. mTKR at one- (6.9°, 95% CI: 3.5, 10.4°) and three months (4.9°, 95% CI: 2.1, 7.7°). Flexion aROM was greater at three postoperative months compared to preoperative aROM only in the raTKR group, and raTKR patients had higher odds of achieving ≥ 90° of flexion at one month after operation (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.99). There were no significant differences between groups in intraoperative (P > 0.999) or postoperative adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with mTKR, raTKR resulted  in less loss of aROM immediately after operation and a faster recovery of aROM within three months after operation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT# 03737149).

Bibliometric Evaluation of the 100 Top-Cited Articles on Anesthesiology

This review is a bibliometric analysis based on anesthesiology, which is a medical specialty that deals with a patient's complete preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. The objective of the review attempts to analyze the bibliometric characteristics of the 100 most top-cited articles on anesthesiology. The meta-data of the study were collected from the Core Collection of Web of Science database. A title search option was employed, and "Anesthesia" and "Anesthesiology" were typed in two different search boxes separated with the Boolean operator ''OR''. Further, the data were sorted by highest citation order; later, "article" was selected from the filter of document type, and all other types of documents were excluded. Finally, downloaded the bibliographic details of the 100 top-cited articles. VOSviewer Software (version 1.6.10 by van Eck and Waltman) was used for bibliometric network analysis for co-authors and keywords. Pearson chi-square test was used for statistical analysis. The 100 top-cited articles were published between the years of 1971 and 2018. These articles gained a maximum of 1006 to a minimum of 276 citations with an average of 384.57 cites/article. Open accessed articles gained a slightly higher ratio of citations, while more than half of the articles were published in the two leading journals of "Anesthesiology" and "Anesthesia and Analgesia". There was no statistically significant difference in both citation analysis among open and closed access journals and Anesthesia vs Non-Anesthesia journals. Thirty-six articles were published in journals not specifically related to Anesthesia. Most of the top-cited articles were contributed by the United States, whereas Surgery and General Anesthesia were the two most occurred keywords.  We conclude that all the top-cited articles in anesthesiology were contributed by authors who belonged to the developed nations and the United States outclassed the rest of the world. This bibliometric analysis would be valuable to practitioners, academics, researchers, and students to understand the dynamics of progress in the field of anesthesiology.

Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is It Safe? A Single-Center Study of 4,124 Patients in South Korea

Background

Although total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered an effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis, it carries risks of complications. With a growing number of TKAs performed on older patients, understanding the cause of mortality is crucial to enhance the safety of TKA. This study aimed to identify the major causes of short- and long-term mortality after TKA and report mortality trends for major causes of death.

Methods

A total of 4,124 patients who underwent TKA were analyzed. The average age at surgery was 70.7 years. The average follow-up time was 73.5 months. The causes of death were retrospectively collected through Korean Statistical Information Service and classified into 13 subgroups based on the International Classification of Diseases-10 code. The short- and long-term causes of death were identified within the time-to-death intervals of 30, 60, 90, 180, 180 days, and > 180 days. Standard mortality ratios (SMRs) and cumulative incidence of deaths were computed to examine mortality trends after TKA.

Results

The short-term mortality rate was 0.07% for 30 days, 0.1% for 60 days, 0.2% for 90 days, and 0.2% for 180 days. Malignant neoplasm and cardiovascular disease were the main short-term causes of death. The long-term (> 180 days) mortality rate was 6.2%. Malignant neoplasm (35%), others (11.7%), and respiratory disease (10.1%) were the major long-term causes of death. Men had a higher cumulative risk of death for respiratory, metabolic, and cardiovascular diseases. Age-adjusted mortality was significantly higher in TKA patients aged 70 years (SMR, 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-5.4) and between 70 and 79 years (SMR 2.9; 95% CI, 2.5-3.5) than that in the general population.

Conclusions

The short-term mortality rate after TKA was low, and most of the causes were unrelated to TKA. The major causes of long-term death were consistent with previous findings. Our findings can be used as counseling data to understand the survival and mortality of TKA patients.

Risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in lower extremity after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients over 60 years old

PURPOSE

There is a significant risk of DVT after TKA. We aim to evaluate the potential risk factors for postoperative DVT in the lower extremities in TKA patients over 60 years of age and provide a reference for the effective prevention of DVT.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients older than 60 who underwent TKA surgery in our hospital from May 2015 to May 2022 and compared and analyzed patients' personal characteristics and clinical data with or without postoperative DVT. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the potential risk factors for DVT after TKA. The sensitivity and specificity of each risk factor in the diagnosis of DVT were compared by the ROC curve, and the value of this model in the diagnosis of DVT was further investigated using a multivariable combined diagnosis ROC curve model.

RESULTS

A total of 661 patients over 60 who underwent TKA were included. Preoperative Hematocrit (HCT), platelet count, anesthesia mode, postoperative D-dimer, ESR, diabetes mellitus, and other aspects of the DVT group and non-DVT group were statistically significant after TKA (P < 0.05). Multivariate logistics regression analysis showed that preoperative HCT, anesthesia mode, and diabetes were independent risk factors for DVT in patients over 60 years old after TKA. Compared with the univariate ROC model, the multivariable combined ROC curve analysis model has a higher diagnostic value for the diagnosis of DVT.

CONCLUSION

DVT is common in patients over 60 years of age after TKA, and there is a multivariable influence on its pathogenesis. For patients over 60 with diabetes, neuraxial anesthesia is recommended for patients with high preoperative HCT levels, which may reduce the incidence of postoperative DVT.

Risk factors for rehospitalization within 90 days in patients with total joint replacement: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk factors influencing the readmission within 90 days following total joint replacement (TJR) are complex and heterogeneous, and few systematic reviews to date have focused on this issue.

METHODS

Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched from the inception dates to December 2022. Relevant, published studies were identified using the following keywords: risk factors, rehospitalization, total hip replacement, total knee replacement, total shoulder replacement, and total joint replacement. All relevant data were collected from the studies that meet the inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

Of 68,336 patients who underwent TJR, 1,269,415 (5.4%) were readmitted within 90 days. High American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (OR, 1.502; 95%CI:1.405-1.605; P < .001), heart failure (OR,1.494; 95%CI: 1.235-1.754; P < .001), diabetes (OR, 1.246; 95%CI:1.128-1.377; P < .001), liver disease (OR, 1.339; 95%CI:1.237-1.450; P < .001), drinking (OR, 1.114; 95%CI:1.041-1.192; P = .002), depression (OR, 1.294; 95%CI:1.223-1.396; P < .001), urinary tract infection (OR, 5.879; 95%CI: 5.119-6.753; P < .001), and deep vein thrombosis (OR, 10.007; 95%CI: 8.787-11.396; P < .001) showed statistically positive correlation with increased 90-day readmissions after TJR, but high blood pressure, smoking, and pneumonia had no significant association with readmission risk.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this review and meta-analysis will aid clinicians as they seek to understand the risk factors for 90-day readmission following TJR. Clinicians should consider the identified key risk factors associated with unplanned readmissions and develop strategies to risk-stratify patients and provide dedicated interventions to reduce the rates of readmission and enhance the recovery process.

Efficacy of Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Lower Extremity Microvascular Reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Some surgeons have raised concerns regarding the sympathectomy-like effect of epidural anesthesia during lower limb microvascular reconstruction. The combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthetic technique incorporates several benefits of spinal and epidural techniques in a single approach. The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower limb by implementing the CSE anesthesia approach.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records from patients who underwent lower limb reconstructive procedures under CSE anesthesia with free tissue transfer from January 2017 to December 2020. We evaluated the postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients underwent microvascular reconstructive procedures of the lower extremity over the study period. The average age and BMI were 38.4-year and 28 kg/m2. All patients only had one postoperative rescue dose with epidural anesthesia. The most common type of flap used was the anterolateral thigh flap (53%). The average splinting time and length of stay (LoS) were 8.4 days and 18.4 days, respectively. Donor-site complications included wound dehiscence (3%) and surgical site infection (3%). Recipient-site complications included partial flap loss (8%) and total flap loss (10%). No pro re nata morphine analgesia was used. Tramadol and/or ketoprofen were administered for postoperative analgesia. The average time to start physiotherapy and to resume daily activities were 10 days and 29 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The CSE anesthesia for microvascular reconstruction of the lower limb demonstrated a similar success rate compared to historical records. CSE provided adequate pain management and none of the patients required postoperative monitoring in the ICU.

Health and Socioeconomic Risk Factors for Unplanned Hospitalization Following Ambulatory Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Development of a Patient Selection Tool Using Machine Learning

BACKGROUND

Identifying ambulatory surgical candidates at risk for adverse surgical outcomes can optimize outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop and internally validate a machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict contributors to unexpected hospitalizations after ambulatory unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA).

METHODS

A total of 2,521 patients undergoing UKA from 2006 to 2018 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients admitted overnight postoperatively were identified as those who had a length of stay ≥ 1 day were analyzed with four individual ML models (ie, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, adaptive boosting, and elastic net penalized logistic regression). An additional model was produced as a weighted ensemble of the four individual algorithms. Area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) compared predictive capacity of these models to conventional logistic regression techniques.

RESULTS

Of the 2,521 patients identified, 103 (4.1%) required at least one overnight stay following ambulatory UKA. The ML ensemble model achieved the best performance based on discrimination assessed via internal validation (AUROC = 87.3), outperforming individual models and conventional logistic regression (AUROC = 81.9-85.7). The variables determined most important by the ensemble model were cumulative time in the operating room, utilization of general anesthesia, increasing age, and patient residency in more urban areas. The model was integrated into a web-based open-access application.

CONCLUSION

The ensemble gradient-boosted ML algorithm demonstrated the highest performance in identifying factors contributing to unexpected hospitalizations in patients receiving UKA. This tool allows physicians and healthcare systems to identify patients at a higher risk of needing inpatient care after UKA.

Orthopaedic Surgery Complications at a Tertiary Care Hospital in a Low- and Middle-Income Country: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Analysis

BACKGROUND

Through a comparison of orthopaedic surgical procedures performed at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan with other participating hospitals of National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP), we aim to identify the areas of orthopaedic surgical care at our center that need improvement and also those which are at par with international standards.

METHODS

The study analyses orthopaedic surgeries at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan using NSQIP registry to compare complication rates with other American College of Surgeons-NSQIP participant hospitals. Two reviewers collect data in different days every 8 days to reduce bias, and the results are reported in odds ratios using quarterly reports. This study included 584 eligible orthopaedic cases performed in 2021. Yearly institutional reports with odds ratios were also used to identify areas needing improvement and to implement changes to improve orthopaedic surgical outcomes at said institute.

RESULTS

The quarterly reports suggest a relatively higher OR for certain indicators such as cardiac events, surgical site infection, mortality, and morbidity throughout. The renal failure rate was very high in the third and fourth quarters with odds ratios of 4.57 and 10.31, respectively. However, the official NSQIP annual institutional report for 2021 identified sepsis, surgical site infections, and cardiac complications as areas 'needing improvement'. It also indicated that the hospital performed exemplarily when it came to venous thromboembolism (VTE). As for the rest of the indicators, the hospital fell in the 'as expected' category of the NSQIP standards.

CONCLUSION

This initial report helps the hospital's orthopaedic department in recognizing areas for improvement and making system-level changes to improve patient outcomes. The implementation of these interventions has yielded favorable outcomes, as evidenced by the findings in the NSQIP yearly report for 2022. Reinforcements and measures are needed to be taken to reduce the adverse events even further and to improve the patient outcomes and quality.

Postoperative complications of spinal vs general anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Elderly patients with hip fractures are at high risk for mortality due to postsurgical complications. Hip hemiarthroplasty is a routine procedure done in elderly patients for surgical repair  of femoral neck fractures. Both general and spinal anesthesia can be used in elderly patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty. Rates of postoperative complications among the two anesthetic choices have not been directly compared. In this study, we compare the rates of postoperative complications in elderly patients (age greater than 70) undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures using a national database.

METHODS

Data for the years 2015-2020 from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) were used for the study. Patients greater than 70 years of age who received a hip hemiarthroplasty with general anesthesia or spinal anesthesia were identified using CPT procedure codes. Pertinent preoperative variables and rates of postoperative complications were characterized and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our study found that elderly patients who received spinal anesthesia had, on average, longer length of stays but shorter operative times compared to patients who received general anesthesia. Furthermore, we found that patients who received spinal anesthesia had lower rates of systemic sepsis, cardiac arrests, and blood transfusions when compared to patients who received general anesthesia. Finally, we found that overall rates of mortality were significantly lower in the spinal anesthesia cohort compared to the general anesthesia cohort.

CONCLUSION

Our work suggests that patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for hip arthroplasty may have lower rates of postoperative complications. This work further highlights the role of anesthetic choice in preventing complications following hip hemiarthroplasty procedures.

Outpatient Total Knee Arthroplasty Shows Decreasing Complication Burden From 2010 to 2020

BACKGROUND

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed on an outpatient basis continues to increase. The purpose of this study was to compare complication rates over the last decade to evaluate trends in the safety of outpatient TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent TKA from 2010 to 2020 from a large administrative claims database were retrospectively identified and stratified based on the year of surgery. Propensity-score matching was performed to match patients who were discharged within 24 hours of surgery to inpatients based on age, sex, comorbidity index, and year of surgery. Linear regression analyses were used to compare trends from 2010 to 2020. The 90-day adverse events in the early cohort (2010-2012) were compared to those in the late cohort (2018-2020) using multivariable regression analyses. Of the 547,137 patients in the sample, 28,951 outpatients (5.3%) were propensity matched to inpatients.

RESULTS

The incidence of outpatient TKA increased from 2010 to 2018 (1.9 versus 13.8%, P < .001). Despite a similar complication rate early (24.1 versus 22.6%, P = .164), outpatient TKA had fewer complications at the end of the study period (13.7 versus 16.7%, P < .001). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that the risk of any complication after outpatient TKA was lower than inpatient from 2018 to 2020 (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Complications in both cohorts declined dramatically suggesting improvements in quality of care over time, with the greatest decline in patients undergoing outpatient surgery. These results suggest that outpatient TKA today is not higher risk for the patient than inpatient TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Current Trends and Future Directions for Outpatient Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Review of the Anesthesia Choices and Analgesic Options

The aging population and the obesity epidemic have led to an increased rate of joint arthroplasty procedures, specifically total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty. These surgeries are associated with increased hospital length of stay and, consequently, higher costs. Despite the benefits of outpatient surgery, only a small percentage of total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) are done in this manner. We reviewed the most up-to-date trends for outpatient TJA and discussed essential factors for a successful outpatient program, including the proper patient selection process and best available anesthetic and analgesic options, along with their risks and benefits. Risk stratification tools, such as the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment, are helpful for predicting outcomes regarding outpatient TJA, and neuraxial anesthesia should be considered to minimize complications and facilitate early discharge. A multimodal analgesia regimen could be effective for pain management in outpatient TJA, and the currently recommended peripheral nerve blocks for total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty are the fascia iliaca compartment block and adductor canal block, respectively. However, blocks should be carefully considered for outpatient procedures. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols help to guide perioperative care teams and allow for improved patient recovery, decreased length of stay, and increased patient satisfaction.

Prediction of suitable outpatient candidates following revision total knee arthroplasty using machine learning

Aims

To identify variables independently associated with same-day discharge (SDD) of patients following revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) and to develop machine learning algorithms to predict suitable candidates for outpatient rTKA.

Methods

Data were obtained from the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Programme (ACS-NSQIP) database from the years 2018 to 2020. Patients with elective, unilateral rTKA procedures and a total hospital length of stay between zero and four days were included. Demographic, preoperative, and intraoperative variables were analyzed. A multivariable logistic regression (MLR) model and various machine learning techniques were compared using area under the curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis. Important and significant variables were identified from the models.

Results

Of the 5,600 patients included in this study, 342 (6.1%) underwent SDD. The random forest (RF) model performed the best overall, with an internally validated AUC of 0.810. The ten crucial factors favoring SDD in the RF model include operating time, anaesthesia type, age, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, race, history of diabetes, rTKA type, sex, and smoking status. Eight of these variables were also found to be significant in the MLR model.

Conclusion

The RF model displayed excellent accuracy and identified clinically important variables for determining candidates for SDD following rTKA. Machine learning techniques such as RF will allow clinicians to accurately risk-stratify their patients preoperatively, in order to optimize resources and improve patient outcomes.

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Interest in spinal anesthesia utilization in revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) is rising. This study investigated the pain control, length of stay (LOS), and complications associated with spinal versus general anesthesia in a single institution series of revision TKAs.

METHODS

We identified 3,711 revision TKAs (3,495 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry. There were 66% who had general anesthesia and 34% who had spinal anesthesia. Mean age, sex, and BMI were similar between groups at 67 years, 53% women, and 32, respectively. Data were analyzed using inverse probability of treatment weighted models based on propensity scores that accounted for patient and operative factors. Mean follow-up was 6 years (range, 2 to 17).

RESULTS

Patients treated with spinal anesthesia required fewer postoperative oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) (P < .0001) and had lower numeric pain rating scale scores (P < .001). Spinal anesthesia was associated with shorter LOS (4.0 versus 4.6 days; P < .0001), less cases of altered mental status (AMS; Odds Ratio (OR) 2.0, P = .004), less intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (OR 1.6, P = .02), fewer re-revisions (OR 1.7, P < .001), and less reoperations (OR 1.4, P < .001). There was no difference in the incidence of VTE (P = .82), 30-day readmissions (P = .06), or 90-day readmissions (P = .18) between anesthetic techniques.

CONCLUSION

We found that spinal anesthesia for revision TKAs was associated with significantly lower pain scores, reduced OME requirements, and decreased LOS. Furthermore, spinal anesthesia was associated with fewer cases of AMS, ICU admissions, and re-revisions even after accounting for numerous patient and operative factors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective Comparative Study.

Does the type of anesthesia (regional vs. general) represent an independent predictor for in-hospital complications in operatively treated malleolar fractures? A retrospective analysis of 5262 patients

PURPOSE

The impact of the type of anesthesia (regional vs. general anesthesia) on in-hospital complications in ankle fractures has not been thoroughly studied yet. Identifying factors that place patients at risk for complications following ankle fractures may help reduce their occurrence. The primary goal of this study was (1) to describe the cohort of patients and (2) to evaluate independent risk factors for complications during hospitalization.

METHODS

We analyzed patients from 2005 to 2019 with an operatively treated isolated fracture of the medial or lateral malleolus using a prospective national quality measurement database. Patients were selected based on international classifications (ICD) and national procedural codes (CHOP). Uni- and multivariate analysis were applied.

RESULTS

In total, we analyzed 5262 patients who suffered a fracture of the malleolus; 3003 patients (57%) had regional and 2259 (43%) general anesthesia. Patients with regional anesthesia were significantly older (51 vs. 46 years), but healthier (23 vs. 28% comorbidities) than patients who received general anesthesia. The in-hospital complication rate was not significantly lower in regional anesthesia (2.2% vs 3.0%). The type of anesthesia was not an independent predictor for complications while controlling for confounders.

CONCLUSION

Type of anesthesia was not an independent predictor of complications; however, higher ASA class, age over 70 years, fracture of the medial versus lateral malleolus, longer preoperative stay, and duration of surgery were significant predictors of complications. Patient and procedure characteristics, as well as changes in medical care and epidemiological changes along with patient requests, influenced the choice of the type of anesthesia.

Association of patient characteristics with the receipt of regional anesthesia

BACKGROUND

Regional anesthesia (RA) may improve patient-related outcomes, including decreased operative complications, shortened recovery times, and lower hospital readmission rates. More analyses are needed using a diverse set of databases to examine characteristics associated with the receipt of RA.

METHODS

A national hospital database was queried for patients 18 years or older who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), carpal tunnel release, ankle open reduction, and internal fixation and arteriovenous fistula creation between January 2016 and June 2021. Regional techniques included neuraxial anesthesia and various upper and lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks to create a binary variable of RA receipt. Univariate statistics were used to compare characteristics associated based on RA receipt and multivariable regression identified factors associated with RA receipt.

RESULTS

A total of 51 776 patients were included in the analysis, of which 2111 (4.1%) received RA. Factors associated with decreased odds of RA receipt included black race (vs white race; OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.86), other non-white race (vs white race; OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.86), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class (vs ASA 1; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.93), and Medicaid insurance (vs private insurance; OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.82) (all p<0.05). When compared with TKA, ACLR (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.84), ankle open reduction and internal fixation (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.81), and carpal tunnel release (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.78) demonstrated lower odds of RA receipt, whereas TSA (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.58) demonstrated higher odds of RA receipt (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

RA use varies with respect to race, insurance status, and type of surgery.

Neuraxial versus general anesthesia for perioperative outcomes and resource utilization following knee arthroplasty: experience from a large national database

INTRODUCTION

Attentions have been paid to the optimal anesthesia for knee arthroplasty (KA). We sought to investigate whether neuraxial anesthesia (NA) is superior to general anesthesia (GA) in terms of perioperative outcomes and resource utilization following KA.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary KA registered in the Hospital Quality Monitoring System (HQMS) in China during 2013-2019 were identified. By utilizing a time-stratified propensity score matching, every patient receiving NA was matched by propensity score to a patient receiving GA. Then, we conducted Poisson, logistic, and linear regression to compare NA with GA in terms of perioperative outcomes and resource utilization.

RESULTS

Of 109,132 included participants, 75,945 (69.59%) underwent KA with GA and 33,187 (30.41%) with NA. After propensity score matching (26,425 participants per group), NA was associated with lower incidence of blood transfusion (OR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.77-0.87; p < 0.0001), 30-day readmission (OR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.68-0.84; p < 0.0001), and 90-day readmission (OR: 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.90; p < 0.0001). No statistically significant difference in in-hospital mortality, incidence of pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and surgical site infection was found. In addition, NA was associated with a 1% decrease in length of stay (95% CI 0-2%; p = 0.0070) and a 3% lower total hospital charge (95% CI 2-4%; p < 0.0001) when compared with GA.

CONCLUSION

Compared with GA, NA was associated with decreased incidence of blood transfusion, readmission, reduced length of stay, and total hospital charge following KA, suggesting the favorable role of NA for perioperative outcomes and resource utilization in KA.

Spinal Versus General Anesthesia in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Are There Differences in Complication and Readmission Rates?

BACKGROUND

Spinal anesthesia (SP) utilization continues to expand in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, little is known regarding differences in complication rates between spinal and general anesthesia used for primary TKA. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the length of stay (LOS), operative time, and readmission and revision rates between patients who received spinal and general anesthesia during TKA.

METHODS

The American Joint Replacement Registry (AJRR) was used to identify primary elective TKA patients from 2017 to 2020. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts, general (GN) and SP, based on the mode of anesthesia administered during the index surgery. In total, 270,251 TKAs were identified, of which 126,970 (47.0%) received general anesthesia and 143,281 (53.0%) received spinal anesthesia. Length of stay, operative time, 90-day readmission, and 90-day revisions were compared between the 2 groups. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for potential confounders.

RESULTS

After accounting for confounding factors, SP was associated with a lower risk of having a LOS greater than 3 days (odds ratio [OR] 0.470, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.454-0.487, P < .0001), but a slightly higher likelihood of having a longer operative time (OR 1.075, 95% CI 1.056-1.094, P < .0001). SP was also linked to lower rates of 90-day readmission (OR 0.845, 95% CI 0.790-0.904, P < .0001) and lower risk of 90-day all-cause revision (OR 0.506, 95% CI 0.462-0.555, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

SP was associated with a lower 90-day readmission rate and a lower risk of 90-day revision. These findings support the best practice guidelines of The Joint Commission to use spinal anesthesia when possible as part of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.

Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Comparative Rates of Transient Neurological Symptoms and Urinary Retention using Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, and Bupivacaine

BACKGROUND

Short-acting spinal anesthetics enable rapid recovery hip and knee arthroplasty, however concerns with transient neurological symptoms (TNS) cause some to avoid using lidocaine. Post-operative urinary retention (POUR) is also a concern with spinal anesthesia. We sought to study the comparative rates of TNS and POUR between lidocaine, mepivacaine, and bupivacaine in a high-volume hip and knee arthroplasty setting.

METHODS

Data for 1,217 primary THA, TKA, and UKA cases were reviewed and grouped by spinal anesthetic agent (Lidocaine, Mepivacaine, or Bupivacaine). Of the 1,217 cases, utilization was 523 Lidocaine, 573 Mepivacaine, and 121 Bupivacaine. The incidence of TNS and POUR requiring catheterization was measured both by clinical evaluation as well as a questionnaire sent to patients 14 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

The overall rate of TNS was 8%. With the numbers available, there was no difference in rates of TNS between groups (6.9% Lidocaine, 9.2% Mepivacaine, and 4.1% Bupivacaine; P=0.297). There was no difference in rates of TNS or POUR between THA and TKA/UKA. Bupivacaine had a significantly higher rate of urinary retention (9.1%; P<0.001) than mepivacaine (2.8%) or lidocaine (1.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed no difference in the rate of TNS between the 3 common agents used in spinal anesthesia. Short-acting spinal anesthetics such as lidocaine and mepivacaine can lower the rate of POUR requiring catheterization helping to enable rapid recovery hip and knee arthroplasty.

General Versus Locoregional Anesthesia in TEVAR: An NSQIP Analysis

BACKGROUND

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) is a minimally invasive surgery for repairing thoracic aneurysms and dissections. This study aims to compare postoperative outcomes of TEVAR performed under general versus locoregional anesthesia.

METHODS

Utilizing the 2008-2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database, patients older than the age of 18 years who received TEVAR, were identified using the following current procedural terminology codes: 33,880, 33,881, 33,883, 33,884, or 33,886. Patients who underwent concomitant procedures, those with both thoracoabdominal and abdominal aortic pathologies, and trauma cases were excluded. Standard descriptive statistics, in addition to χ2, Fisher's exact test, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to compare patient baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes between general and locoregional anesthesia groups as appropriate. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess independent predictors of hospital length of stay (LOS) greater than 7 days.

RESULTS

Of the 1,028 patients included in the study, 86.5% received general anesthesia, and 13.5% received locoregional anesthesia, such as local anesthesia with monitored anesthesia care or regional anesthesia. No significant differences were found between patients receiving locoregional versus general anesthesia in mortality (3.6% vs. 7.9%, respectively, P = 0.071) and morbidity (18.7% and 24.8%, respectively, P = 0.121) within 30 days post-TEVAR, including any wound, pulmonary, thromboembolic, renal, septic, and cardiac arrest complications. Patients who received general anesthesia had significantly higher median LOS compared to those who received locoregional anesthesia [5 days (interquartile range (IQR): 3-10) versus 4 days (IQR: 2-7), P = 0.002], with 34.3% of the general anesthesia group having an LOS greater than 7 days compared to 21.6% of locoregional anesthesia group, P = 0.003. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, general anesthesia was found to be an independent predictor of prolonged LOS greater than 7 days (odds ratio (OR): 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.05-2.81, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional anesthesia results in significantly lower postoperative hospital LOS with similar postoperative mortality and morbidity compared to general anesthesia in patients undergoing TEVAR.

Changes in Neuraxial Anesthesia Protocols and Improved Efficiency of Same-Day Discharge Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Ambulatory Surgery Center: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effect of bupivacaine versus mepivacaine spinal anesthesia and preoperative adductor canal block (ACB) on recovery, length of stay, pain, and complications of same-day discharge total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent TKA between March 2018 and September 2019. The patients were grouped based on the neuraxial anesthetic regimen: bupivacaine with ACB, bupivacaine without ACB, and mepivacaine without ACB. Preoperative ACBs were discontinued in December 2018, and use of mepivacaine spinal anesthesia was initiated in March 2019. Length of stay in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), time to controlled void and ambulation, postoperative pain, morphine milligram equivalents (MME), and transient neurologic symptoms were compared.

RESULTS

Ninety consecutive patients who underwent TKA were identified. Fifty patients received bupivacaine with ACB, 20 received bupivacaine without ACB, and 20 received mepivacaine without ACB. Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia led to a 93-minute shorter PACU stay (P < 0.001), 115-minute quicker time to void (P < 0.001), 60-minute earlier ambulation (P = 0.024), and 109-minute shorter total facility time (P = 0.003) but increased total MME (P = 0.049) despite nonsignificant difference in pain at discharge (P = 0.908) compared with bupivacaine. Patients receiving bupivacaine with and without ACB had a nonsignificant difference in pain scores at discharge, time to ambulation, and time to discharge (P ≥ 0.1). No transient neurologic symptoms or overnight stays were observed.

DISCUSSION

Mepivacaine spinal anesthesia for TKA safely facilitated more rapid same-day discharge through decreased times to controlled void and ambulation but with a slight increase in MME requirements. Discontinuing preoperative ACBs did not negatively affect PACU outcomes.

Visualizing the randomized sham-controlled trial in orthopedic research: proposed steps to conducting a total knee arthroplasty randomized controlled trial

Performed more than 600,000 times annually in the USA alone, total knee arthroplasty is the one of the most common and costly elective operations in the world. A primary total knee arthroplasty is generally an elective procedure, for which total index hospitalization costs are estimated around $30,000 USD. Roughly four in five patients declare they are satisfied postoperatively, justifying the procedure's frequency and high costs. It is sobering to realize, however, that the evidence base in favor of this procedure remains circumstantial. We as a profession lack randomized trials showing a subjective improvement over placebo intervention. We argue for the necessity of sham-controlled surgical trials in this setting and provide a surgical atlas showing how a sham operation may be performed.

Effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on thirty-day outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: A matched-pair cohort analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

It has not yet been established whether total hip arthroplasty complications are associated with anesthetic technique (spinal versus general). This study assessed the effect of spinal versus general anesthesia on health care resource utilization and secondary endpoints following total hip arthroplasty.

DESIGN

Propensity-matched cohort analysis.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program participating hospitals from 2015 to 2021.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty (n = 223,060).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

The a priori study duration was 2015 to 2018 (n = 109,830). The primary endpoint was 30-day unplanned resource utilization, namely readmission and reoperation. Secondary endpoints included 30-day wound complications, systemic complications, bleeding events, and mortality. The impact of anesthetic technique was investigated with univariate analyses, multivariable analyses, and survival analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

The 1:1 propensity-matched cohort included 96,880 total patients (48,440 in each anesthesia group) from 2015 to 2018. On univariate analysis, spinal anesthesia was associated with a lower incidence of unplanned resource utilization (3.1% [1486/48440] vs 3.7% [1770/48440]; odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90]; P < .001), systemic complications (1.1% [520/48440] vs 1.5% [723/48440]; OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.80]; P < .001), and bleeding events requiring transfusion (2.3% [1120/48440] vs 4.9% [2390/48440]; OR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.49]; P < .001). On multivariable analysis, spinal anesthesia remained an independent predictor of unplanned resource utilization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.84 [95% CI, 0.78 to 0.90]; c = 0.646), systemic complications (AOR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.81]; c = 0.676), and bleeding events (AOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.49]; c = 0.686). Hospital length of stay was also shorter in the spinal anesthesia cohort (2.15 vs 2.24 days; mean difference, -0.09 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.07]; P < .001). Similar findings were observed in the cohort from 2019 to 2021.

CONCLUSIONS

Total hip arthroplasty patients receiving spinal anesthesia experience favorable outcomes compared to propensity-matched general anesthesia patients.

Comparison of general and regional anesthesia on short-term complications in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective study using national health insurance service-national sample cohort

This retrospective study compared the mortality and short-term complications according to the choice of general anesthesia or regional anesthesia in patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We searched the Korean National Health Insurance Service National Sample Cohort database to analyze data from patients who received a TKA between January 2002 and December 2015. Before comparing the general and the regional anesthesia groups, the bias was reduced by propensity score matching. After matching, the mortality and complications occurring within 30 days after a TKA were compared between the 2 groups. In the database, 6491 primary TKA cases were identified. Nine hundred forty-three patients (14.5%) had a TKA performed under general anesthesia, and 5548 (85.5%) had a TKA performed under regional anesthesia. After propensity score matching, the data of 1886 patients were analyzed, with 943 patients in each group. There was no significant difference in mortality (0.32% vs 0.00%), transfusion rate (84.52% vs 84.73%, P = .8989), and length of hospital stay (50 vs 53, P = .5391) between the general and regional anesthesia groups. Most of the complications were not significantly different, but the major complications, including myocardial infarction (1.70% vs 0.64%, P = .0414) and acute renal failure (0.85% vs 0.11%, P = .0391), were higher in the general anesthesia group than in the regional anesthesia group. Also, admission to the intensive care unit (8.48% vs 2.33%, P < .0001) and total cost (₩8067, 400 vs ₩7487, 940, P = .0002) were higher in the general anesthesia group than in the regional anesthesia group. Our study found that regional anesthesia for TKA is associated with a decrease in major complications, including myocardial infarction and acute renal failure, and medical costs.

Spinal anesthesia is a grossly underutilized gold standard in primary total joint arthroplasty: propensity-matched analysis of a national surgical quality database

BACKGROUND

There is currently no consensus regarding the optimal anesthetic technique for total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA, TKA). This study aimed to compare the utilization rates and safety of spinal vs. general anesthesia in contemporary THA/TKA practice.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP), a retrospective review of 307,076 patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty under either spinal or general anesthesia between January 2015 and December 2018 was performed. Propensity matching was used to compare differences in operative times, hospital length of stay, discharge destination, and 30-day adverse events. The annual utilization rates for both techniques between 2011 and 2018 were also assessed.

RESULTS

Patients receiving spinal anesthesia had a shorter length of stay (P < 0.001) for TKA while no statistical differences in length of stay were observed for THA. Patients were also less likely to experience any 30-day complication (OR = 0.82, P <0.001 and OR = 0.92, P < 0.001 for THA and TKA, respectively) while being more likely to be discharged to home (OR = 1.46, P < 0.001 and OR = 1.44, P < 0.001 for THA and TKA, respectively). Between 2011 and 2018, spinal anesthesia utilization only increased by 1.4% for THA (P < 0.001) and decreased by 0.2% for TKA (P < 0.001), reaching 38.1% and 40.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Spinal anesthesia remains a grossly underutilized tool despite providing better perioperative outcomes compared to general anesthesia. As orthopedic surgeons navigate the challenges of value-based care, spinal anesthesia represents an invaluable tool that should be considered the gold standard in elective, primary total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Liberal use of local anaesthetic and the risk of toxicity in elective arthroplasties at a tertiary teaching hospital

Background

Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a life-threatening potential complication that may follow the administration of local anaesthetic (LA) drugs, and is cumulative across the drug class. Local anaesthetics are commonly administered via different routes for elective orthopaedic procedures – both by anaesthetists and surgeons. We hypothesized that total doses of LA may be routinely encroaching upon toxicity.

Methods

All total hip or knee arthroplasties (THAs and TKAs) performed within a 3 month period at the John Hunter Hospital (tertiary referral centre and teaching hospital) were audited to assess total administration of LA. Demographics, surgical characteristics, use of general anaesthesia or sedation, and use of local anaesthetic via any route of administration was recorded. For each patient, a weight-based theoretical maximum safe dose was calculated and compared against the dose they received. Data is presented as mean ± SD, percentages. Statistical significance was determined at p < 0.05.

Results

130 THAs and TKAs were identified within the audit period. 52 patients exceeded their drug-class theoretical maximum safe dose. 49 patients exceeded their weight-based maximum dose for a single LA agent, in all cases ropivacaine. Non-obese individuals receive significantly higher mean dose than obese individuals (119.4% [98.6–140.3] vs 78.82% [65.95–91.69], p = 0.001). No LAST events were identified.

Conclusions

Patients who received elective total hip or knee arthroplasties were exposed to concerningly high total doses of local anaesthetic, suggesting that greater awareness of the additive toxicity of drugs within this class is required.

Optimizing Spinal Anesthesia in Same-Day Discharge Knee Arthroplasty Patients: Mepivacaine Versus Ropivacaine

BACKGROUND

Short-acting spinal anesthetics are playing an increasing role in same-day discharge total joint arthroplasty though their direct comparison remains to be studied. Therefore, this study aims to compare two formulations of spinal anesthesia regarding time to discharge following knee arthroplasty surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed on 207 patients who underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA, n = 172) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA, n = 35) from May 2018 to December 2020 at a single institution and were discharged the same day. Two formulations of the spinal anesthetic were routinely administered in this population: 1) mepivacaine 1.5% 3-4 mL (n = 184) and 2) ropivacaine 0.5% 2.3-2.7 mL (n = 23). Discharge times were subsequently compared between mepivacaine and ropivacaine spinal anesthesia for each surgical procedure and between surgical procedures.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in discharge times between patients receiving mepivacaine versus ropivacaine for UKA (202 minutes [range = 54-449] versus 218 minutes [range = 175-385], P = .45) or TKA (193 minutes [range = 68-384] versus 196 minutes [range = 68-412], P = .93). Similarly, no difference was found in discharge times between UKA and TKA patients receiving mepivacaine (P = .68) or ropivacaine (P = .51).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in discharge times between anesthetic agents among knee surgery patients. Therefore, either agent may be recommended for same-day discharge.

A comparison of in-hospital outcomes after elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in cases with and without Parkinson's Disease

Background

Following orthopedic surgery, patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have been shown to have high rates of surgical complications, and some studies suggest that PD may be associated with greater risk for postoperative medical complications. As complication rates are critical to consider for elective surgery planning, the current study aimed to describe the association of PD with medical complications following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), the most commonly performed procedure to treat cervical degenerative pathology.

Methods

The 2008-2018 National Inpatient Sample database was queried for cases involving elective ACDF. Demographics and comorbidities were extracted using ICD codes. Cases were propensity matched based on demographic and comorbidity burden, and logistic regression was used to compare in-hospital complications between patients with and without PD.

Results

After weighting, a total of 1,273,437 elective ACDF cases were identified, of which 3948 (0.31%) involved cases with PD. After 1:1 propensity score matching by demographic and comorbidity variables, there were no differences between the PD and non-PD cohorts. Logistic regression models constructed for the matched and unmatched populations showed that PD cases have greater odds of in-hospital minor adverse events with no differences in odds of serious adverse events or mortality.

Conclusions

After matching for demographics and comorbidity burden, PD cases undergoing elective ACDF had slightly longer length of stay and greater risk for minor adverse events but had similar rates of serious adverse events and mortality. These findings are important for surgeons and patients to consider when making decisions about surgical intervention.

Anesthesia Type and Postoperative Outcomes for Patients Receiving Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repairs

Background

As the indications for and the volume of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair increase, it is important to optimize perioperative care to minimize postoperative complications and health care costs.

Purpose

We sought to investigate if the anesthesia type used affects the rate of postoperative complications in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to identify patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from 2014 to 2018. Patients were divided into 3 cohorts: general anesthesia, regional anesthesia, and combined general plus regional anesthesia. Bivariate and multivariate analyses with stepwise technique were performed on data related to patient demographics, smoking history, functional status, medical comorbidities (ie, bleeding disorders, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and dialysis), and postoperative outcomes within 30 days of discharge. To assess the independent risk factors for postoperative complications, demographics and medical comorbidities were included in the multivariate analyses for any variables that derived P values <.20.

Results

Of 24,677 total patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, 15,661 (63.5%) had general anesthesia, 889 (3.6%) had regional anesthesia, and 8127 (32.9%) received combined general plus regional anesthesia. Patients who received general anesthesia rather than regional anesthesia were more frequently white (76.8% vs 74.8%, respectively) and had a medical history of hypertension (47.9% vs 41.8%, respectively), smoking (14.9% vs 12.4%, respectively), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (3.4% vs 1.6%, respectively). Compared with patients receiving general anesthesia, those receiving combined general plus regional were more likely to have higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class and a smoking history. Following adjustment, patients who underwent regional anesthesia had a decreased risk for postoperative admission compared with patients who had general anesthesia. Patients who underwent combined regional plus general anesthesia had decreased rates of wound complications and readmission compared with those who received general anesthesia.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, this retrospective study found a significantly higher rate of respiratory and cardiac comorbidities with general anesthesia compared with regional anesthesia. When controlling for these confounders, the use of regional anesthesia was still associated with lower rates of postoperative readmission compared with the general and combined subgroups. Patients receiving combined general plus regional anesthesia had decreased rates of wound complications and readmittance compared with general anesthesia. These findings may influence anesthetic choice in minimizing postoperative complications for rotator cuff repairs.

Spinal versus general anaesthesia in contemporary primary total knee arthroplasties

Aims

Spinal anaesthesia has seen increased use in contemporary primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). However, controversy exists about the benefits of spinal in comparison to general anaesthesia in primary TKAs. This study aimed to investigate the pain control, length of stay (LOS), and complications associated with spinal versus general anaesthesia in primary TKAs from a single, high-volume academic centre.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 17,690 primary TKAs (13,297 patients) from 2001 to 2016 using our institutional total joint registry, where 52% had general anaesthesia and 48% had spinal anaesthesia. Baseline characteristics were similar between cohorts with a mean age of 68 years (SD 10), 58% female (n = 7,669), and mean BMI of 32 kg/m2 (SD 7). Pain was evaluated using oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) data. Complications including 30- and 90-day readmissions were studied. Data were analyzed using an inverse probability of treatment weighted model based on propensity score that included many patient and surgical factors. Mean follow-up was seven years (2 to 18).

Results

Patients treated with spinal anaesthesia required fewer postoperative OMEs (p < 0.001) and had lower NPRS scores (p < 0.001). Spinal anaesthesia also had fewer cases of altered mental status (AMS; odds ratio (OR) 1.3; p = 0.044), as well as 30-day (OR 1.4; p < 0.001) and 90-day readmissions (OR 1.5; p < 0.001). General anaesthesia was associated with increased risk of any revision (OR 1.2; p = 0.021) and any reoperation (1.3; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In the largest single institutional report to date, we found that spinal anaesthesia was associated with significantly lower OME use, lower risk of AMS, and lower overall 30- and 90-day readmissions following primary TKAs. Additionally, spinal anaesthesia was associated with reduced risk of any revision and any reoperation after accounting for numerous patient and operative factors. When possible and safe, spinal anaesthesia should be considered in primary TKAs. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(11):1209–1214.