Risk factors for pulmonary metastases from giant cell tumor of bone

Comparative analysis of aggressiveness in giant cell tumor of bone between upper and lower extremities: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background and Objective

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is among the most prevalent benign primary bone tumors, characterized by its potential for aggressive local recurrence, soft tissue invasion, and, though rare, lung metastasis. Emerging evidence suggests unique behavioral patterns of GCTB in extremities. This study seeks to rigorously compare the aggressiveness of GCTB in the upper versus lower extremities, centering on recurrence rates.

Method

This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, sourced data from MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, CINAHL/EBSCO, and reference lists of pertinent studies. Two independent reviewers screened studies, with discrepancies resolved by discussion. Eligible studies included a minimum of 10 participants. Data extraction and analysis were performed by an additional team of two researchers.

Results

Out of 1,283 studies spanning from 1984 to 2023, 30 met eligibility, encompassing 2,672 participants. The mean age was 32.77 ± 12.99 years, with an average follow-up of 75.53 ± 65.88 months. GCTB predominantly affected the lower extremities, accounting for 1,937 cases. Notably, comparisons of aggressiveness between upper and lower extremity GCTB revealed no statistically significant difference (OR = 1.10, p = 0.56 for Surgery Group; OR = 1.16, p = 0.45 for Local Adjuvant Group; and OR = 1.71, p = 0.32 for Drug/Denosumab Group).

Conclusion

This analysis underscores the lower extremities as the primary site for GCTB but finds no significant difference in aggressiveness between upper and lower extremities. These findings challenge assumptions about GCTB behavior based on tumor location and highlight the need for further investigation to fully elucidate the complex biology of extremity GCTB.

Management and surveillance of metastatic giant cell tumour of bone

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is viewed as a benign, locally aggressive primary bone tumour with metastatic potential. Current management is surgery with bone curettage or resection and systemic therapy with denosumab. Diagnosis is confirmed histologically prior to surgery, with staging for pulmonary disease, as pulmonary metastases (PM) reportedly occur in <8%. This study aimed to assess incidence, surveillance and management of PM in patients with GCTB, with histopathological review. A retrospective audit of the Oxford bone tumour registry was performed from January 2014 - October 2023. Inclusion criterion was histological confirmation of GCTB. Exclusion criteria were incomplete medical, imaging or histology records, or referral for secondary MDT opinion for diagnosis. From an initial group of 126 GCTB patients, 83 patients met the full selection criteria. Pulmonary metastases were identified in 11 patients. Three with PM were excluded on histopathological review as being giant cell rich osteosarcoma rather than metastatic GCTB. This left 8 (9.6%) patients, one had PM at presentation and seven at follow-up between 2 and 42 months. Two were histologically confirmed after cardiothoracic surgery and biopsy, six radiologically diagnosed. Three (37.5%) patients with PM have died (between 1 and 12 months after confirmed PM), five are alive with stable disease. Seven (87.5%) of patients with pulmonary disease were treated with denosumab/chemotherapy (three before, four after pulmonary diagnosis). Five (62.5%) with pulmonary disease had recurrence of local disease requiring further surgery. Local recurrence was an independent risk factor for PM on statistical analysis. GCTB may present with PM, but more commonly, metastasis occurs after surgery, presenting on surveillance and can progress. There were no distinct differences in histopathological appearance between patients with GCTB that developed PM and those that did not, therefore morphological features of the tumour cannot be currently used to predict tumour behaviour. PM can behave aggressively, necessitating identifying histological markers to recognise patients at risk of metastatic GCTB, for example, through mRNA single cell analysis. We propose GCTB patients with PM receive regular chest surveillance with PET scan and/or CT to monitor disease progression, and a multi-centre audit of GCTB outcome undertaken to further define optimal clinical management.

UK guidelines for the management of bone sarcomas

This document is an update of the British Sarcoma Group guidelines (2016) and provides a reference standard for the clinical care of UK patients with primary malignant bone tumours (PMBT) and giant cell tumours (GCTB) of bone. The guidelines recommend treatments that are effective and should be available in the UK, and support decisions about management and service delivery. The document represents a consensus amongst British Sarcoma Group members in 2024. Key recommendations are that bone pain, or a palpable mass should always lead to further investigation and that patients with clinical or radiological findings suggestive of a primary bone tumour at any anatomic site should be referred to a specialist centre and managed by an accredited bone sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Treatment recommendations are provided for the major tumour types and for localised, metastatic and recurrent disease. Follow-up schedules are suggested.

The successful control of multiple pulmonary metastasis from giant cell tumor of bone by monthly denosumab administration: A case report

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive benign neoplasm that is associated with a large biological spectrum ranging from latent benign to highly recurrent and occasionally metastatic tumor. In this article, we present a case of a 37-year-old woman who presented with fracture at the distal femur due to GCTB. Bone segment resection and reconstruction were done, and histopathology showed tumor features for GCTB. Later, multiple lung metastasis was found 22 months post-operation, which was verified by biopsy. Then systemic denosumab therapy with different intervals (1-month and 2-month) was tried as the treatment. It was clarified that monthly denosumab administration, instead of 2-month interval, was required to control the progression of the unresectable multiple lung metastasis from GCTB, which could be a choice for the future treatment of these patients.

Giant cell tumor of bone and secondary osteoarthritis

Giant cell tumor of bone is a commonly encountered aggressive epiphyseal bone tumor, most often treated surgically. The natural history and presentation are classically described but the histopathology is poorly understood. Intralesional curettage is the mainstay of treatment, but there is significant variation in the use of adjuvant and cavity filling modalities. No gold standard has been agreed upon for treatment, and a variety of techniques are currently in use. Given its location, secondary osteoarthritis is a known long-term complication. This review examines the natural history of giant cell tumors, treatment options and complications, and subsequent development of osteoarthritis. Arthroplasty is usually indicated for secondary osteoarthritis although data is limited on its efficacy. Further directions will likely center on improved pharmacological treatments as well as improved arthroplasty techniques.

The Evaluation and Management of Lung Metastases in Patients with Giant Cell Tumors of Bone in the Denosumab Era

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is characterized by uncertain biological behavior due to its local aggressiveness and metastasizing potential. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of the contemporary literature to evaluate all management strategies for GCTB metastases. A combination of the terms "lung metastases", "giant cell tumor", "bone", "treatment", and "oncologic outcomes" returned 133 patients meeting our inclusion criteria: 64 males and 69 females, with a median age of 28 years (7-63), at the onset of primary GCTB. Lung metastases typically occur at a mean interval of 26 months (range: 0-143 months) after treatment of the primary site, commonly presenting as multiple and bilateral lesions. Various treatment approaches, including surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and drug administration, were employed, while 35 patients underwent routine monitoring only. Upon a mean follow-up of about 7 years (range: 1-32 years), 90% of patients were found to be alive, while 10% had died. Death occurred in 25% of patients who had chemotherapy, whereas 96% of those not treated or treated with Denosumab alone were alive at a mean follow-up of 6 years (range: 1-19 years). Given the typically favorable prognosis of lung metastases in patients with GCTB, additional interventions beyond a histological diagnosis confirmation may not be needed. Denosumab, by reducing the progression of the disease, can play a pivotal role in averting or delaying lung failure.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: An Update

Curettage is recommended for the treatment of Campanacci stages 1-2 giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, without preoperative denosumab treatment. In the distal femur, bone chips and plate fixation are utilized to reduce damage to the subchondral bone and prevent pathological fracture, respectively. For local recurrence, re-curettage may be utilized when feasible. En bloc resection is an option for very aggressive Campanacci stage 3 GCTB in the extremities, pelvis, sacrum, and spine, combined with 1-3 doses of preoperative denosumab treatment. Denosumab monotherapy once every 3 months is currently the standard strategy for inoperable patients and those with metastatic GCTB. However, in case of tumor growth, a possible malignant transformation should be considered. Zoledronic acid appears to be as effective as denosumab; nevertheless, it is a more cost-effective option. Therefore, zoledronic acid may be an alternative treatment option, particularly in developing countries. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for malignant GCTB.

A case report on pulmonary metastasis of giant cell tumor mimicking arteriovenous malformation

Giant cell tumor (GCT) is typically a benign tumor of the skeletal system that mainly presents with bone pain. Pulmonary metastasis is one of the distant presentations of GCT in patients who have previously undergone surgical resection of the tumor. Among the various presentations of pulmonary metastasis in GCT, lesions with arteriovenous malformation (AVM) features are rare and have only been reported in a few cases. In this case report, we present the case of a 29-year-old female patient who had previously undergone surgical resection of a GCT in her right lower extremity 4 years ago. The patient was referred to us with progressive dyspnea, and a lesion resembling an AVM was found during radiologic evaluation using chest computed tomography. Pathologic evaluation of the lesion after biopsy revealed that it was a metastasis of GCT presenting with vascular-like features in the lung. This study reports on a very rare occurrence of GCT pulmonary metastasis with an AVM appearance on imaging, highlighting the clinical importance of atypical presentations of pulmonary metastasis in patients with a history of GCT. Appropriate and timely screening and management of such lesions may prevent adverse outcomes such as massive hemorrhage and deterioration of lung function.

RANKL, OPG, and RUNX2 expression and epigenetic modifications in giant cell tumour of bone in 32 patients

Aims

The present study investigated receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-Β ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and Runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) gene expressions in giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) patients in relationship with tumour recurrence. We also aimed to investigate the influence of CpG methylation on the transcriptional levels of RANKL and OPG.

Methods

A total of 32 GCTB tissue samples were analyzed, and the expression of RANKL, OPG, and RUNX2 was evaluated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The methylation status of RANKL and OPG was also evaluated by quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction (qMSP).

Results

We found that RANKL and RUNX2 gene expression was upregulated more in recurrent than in non-recurrent GCTB tissues, while OPG gene expression was downregulated more in recurrent than in non-recurrent GCTB tissues. Additionally, we proved that changes in DNA methylation contribute to upregulating the expression of RANKL and downregulating the expression of OPG, which are critical for bone homeostasis and GCTB development.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the overexpression of RANKL/RUNX2 and the lower expression of OPG are associated with recurrence in GCTB patients.

The Role of En Bloc Resection in the Modern Era for Primary Spine Tumors

STUDY DESIGN

A literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review is to provide an overview of benign and malignant primary spine tumors and a balanced analysis of the benefits and limitations of (and alternatives to) surgical treatment with en bloc resection.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Primary spine tumors are rare but have the potential to cause severe morbidity, either from the disease itself or as a result of treatment. The prognosis, goals, and treatment options vary significantly with the specific disease entity. Appropriate initial management is critical; inappropriate surgery before definitive treatment can lead to recurrence and may render the patient incurable, as salvage options are often inferior.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of the PubMed database for articles relevant to primary spine neoplasms and en bloc spine surgery. Institutional review board approval was not needed.

RESULTS

Although Enneking-appropriate en bloc surgery can be highly morbid, it often provides the greatest chance for local control and/or patient survival. However, there is growing data to support modern radiotherapy as a feasible and less morbid approach to certain primary neoplasms that historically were considered radioresistant.

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing the optimal approach to primary spine tumors is complex. A comprehensive and up-to-date assessment of the evidence is required to guide patient care and to balance the often-competing goals of prolonging life and preserving quality of life.

A machine learning-based model for clinical prediction of distal metastasis in chondrosarcoma: a multicenter, retrospective study

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of distant metastases (DM) limits the overall survival (OS) of patients with chondrosarcoma (CS). Early diagnosis and treatment of CS remains a great challenge in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate metastatic factors and develop a risk stratification model for clinicians' decision-making.

METHODS

Six machine learning (ML) algorithms, including logistic regression (LR), plain Bayesian classifier (NBC), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine (GBM) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). A 10-fold cross-validation was performed for each model separately, multicenter data was used as external validation, and the best (highest AUC) model was selected to build the network calculator.

RESULTS

A total of 1,385 patients met the inclusion criteria, including 82 (5.9%) patients with metastatic CS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of DM was significantly higher in patients with higher pathologic grades, T-stage, N-stage, and non-left primary lesions, as well as those who did not receive surgery and chemotherapy. The AUC of the six ML algorithms for predicting DM ranged from 0.911-0.985, with the extreme gradient enhancement algorithm (XGBoost) having the highest AUC. Therefore, we used the XGB model and uploaded the results to an online risk calculator for estimating DM risk.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, combined with adequate SEER case database and external validation with data from multicenter institutions in different geographic regions, we confirmed that CS, T, N, laterality, and grading of surgery and chemotherapy were independent risk factors for DM. Based on the easily available clinical risk factors, machine learning algorithms built the XGB model that predicts the best outcome for DM. An online risk calculator helps simplify the patient assessment process and provides decision guidance for precision medicine and long-term cancer surveillance, which contributes to the interpretability of the model.

Non‑surgical outcomes and risk factors for pulmonary metastasis from giant cell tumor of bone

The present study detailed four factors associated with an increased risk of pulmonary metastasis, age, pathological fracture, local recurrence and mode of treatment. Local recurrence and pathological fracture were independent risk factors for developing metastasis. From January 2016 to December 2021, data from 50 patients diagnosed with giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) treated in Khon Kaen Hospital, Thailand, were retrospectively analyzed. The risk factors, including age at diagnosis, location of GCTB, clinical presentation, Campanacci stage and no. of local recurrences, for GCTB-induced pulmonary metastasis were evaluated using univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses. Of the 50 patients analyzed, 9 patients (18%), with a mean age of 46.3 years (range, 18-68 years), developed pulmonary metastasis. No patients died from pulmonary metastasis in the present study. Statistically significant associations were observed between the development of metastasis and both clinical fracture [odds ratio (OR), 6.107; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.08-34.70] and local recurrence (OR, 6.48; 95% CI, 1.03-40.87). Patients presenting with both a clinical fracture and local tumor recurrence require more rigorous clinical observation due to the significantly elevated risk of disease progression.

Denosumab for giant cell tumors of bone from 2010 to 2022: a bibliometric analysis

Giant cell tumors of the bone (GCTB) are considered moderately malignant bone tumors. Denosumab, as a neoadjuvant therapy, provides new possibilities for treating GCTB. However, even after multiple studies and long-term clinical trials, there are limitations in the treatment process. Research data and Medical Subject Headings terms related to denosumab and GCTB were collected from January 2010 to October 2022 using the Web of Science and MeSH ( https://meshb.nlm.nih.gov ) browsers. These data were imported into CiteSpace and VOSviewer softwares for bibliometric analysis. Overall, 445 publications on denosumab and GCTB were identified. Over the last 12 years, the growth rate of the total number of publications has remained relatively stable. The USA published the highest number of articles (83) and had the highest centrality (0.42). Amgen Inc. and Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) First Ortoped Rizzoli were identified as the most influential institutions. Many authors have made outstanding contributions to this field. Lancet Oncology had the highest journal impact factor (54.433). Local recurrence and drug dosage are current research hotspots, and future development trends will mainly focus on prognostic markers of GCTB and the development of new therapies. Further research is required to analyze denosumab's safety and efficacy and understand its local recurrence of GCTB, to identify the optimal dose. Future progress in this field will likely focus on exploring new diagnostic and recurrence markers to monitor disease progression and examine new therapeutic targets and treatment strategies.

Giant cell tumors of the distal ulna: long-term recurrence rate and functional outcomes of en bloc resection versus curettage in a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The wrist is the second most commonly involved location for GCTB, while distal ulna is a relatively rare location and limited evidence exists on which surgical approaches and reconstruction techniques are optimal. We carried out a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the recurrence rate of distal ulna GCTB and the long-term functional outcomes of different surgery options.

METHODS

All 28 patients received surgical treatment for distal ulna GCTB in one of three tertiary bone tumor centers between May 2007 and January 2021 with a minimum two-year follow-up. Surgical options included intralesional curettage or en bloc resection (one of 3 types). Functional outcomes were assessed by the MSTS score, the QuickDASH instrument, MWS, and MHQ according to the latest treatment.

RESULTS

Overall recurrence rate was 14.2%. The curettage group (N = 7) had a significantly higher recurrence rate compared to en bloc resection (N = 21) (42.9% vs 4.8%) (mean follow-up: 88.8 mo). Seven patients received the Darrach procedure, 5 received the original Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, and 9 received the modified Sauvé-Kapandji procedure with extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tenodesis. Of the 4 patients having a recurrence, 1 received the Darrach EBR, 2 received the modified Sauvé-Kapandji procedure, and 1 received resection for soft tissue recurrence. Only MWS and esthetics in the MHQ scores were different (curettage, Darrach, Sauvé-Kapandji, and Sauvé-Kapandji with ECU tenodesis [MWS: 96.5 ± 1.3 vs 91.5 ± 4.7 vs 90.8 ± 2.8 vs 91.5 ± 3.6; esthetics in MHQ: 98.5 ± 3.1 vs 89.9 ± 4.7 vs 93.8 ± 4.4 vs 92.6 ± 3.8], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

En bloc resection for distal ulna GCTB had a significantly lower recurrence rate compared with curettage and achieved favorable functional outcome scores. Given the higher recurrence rate after curettage, patients should be well informed of the potential benefits and risks of selecting the distal radioulnar joint-preserving procedure. Moreover, reconstructions after tumor resection of the ulna head do not appear to be necessary.

Case Report: Unresectable pulmonary metastases of a giant cell tumor of bone treated with denosumab: a case report and review of literature

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTB) sometimes metastasize to distant organs. In this case report, we present pulmonary metastases of GCTB mimicking malignancies. A 49-year-old man underwent two surgical treatments for a GCTB of the right proximal radius. At the time of the second surgery, no lesions were observed on chest radiography. Three years after surgery, the patient presented with cough and dyspnea, and chest radiography and computed tomography (CT) revealed multiple lung nodules. Positron emission tomography/CT revealed a high accumulation of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) in multiple lesions. Based on the rapid growth and accumulation of 18F-FDG, a metastatic malignant tumor was suspected. CT-guided needle biopsy was performed, and the histology showed proliferation of spindle cells and multinuclear giant cells without malignant changes. Denosumab was administered because multiple lung lesions were unresectable. One month after denosumab treatment, CT showed marked shrinkage of the lesions, and the symptoms significantly improved. Eighteen months after the initial treatment with denosumab, the patient had no symptoms or tumor growth. Although its long-term efficacy and safety remain unclear, denosumab may be a treatment option for patients with unresectable pulmonary GCTB.

Giant cell tumour of bone in os sacrum of a prepubertal girl - Surgical and medical treatment with zoledronate and denosumab

A giant cell tumour of bone presented in the os sacrum of a prepubertal girl. Surgery with reconstruction was performed, but total resection was impossible. Zoledronate failed to avoid tumour regrowth, and treatment was changed to denosumab, despite not being recommended for use in growing children. Denosumab treatment for 21 months reduced and stabilized tumour size, the girl became pain free with asymptomatic side effects as mild hypocalcemia, hypophosphatemia and sclerosis of newly formed bone.

Management of a rare giant cell tumor of the distal fibula: A case report

BACKGROUND

Aggressive giant cell tumor of the distal fibula is so rare that no consensus on a surgical strategy has been reached. Thus, an appropriate treatment strategy is still important to discuss.

CASE SUMMARY

A 61-year-old man who had been experiencing progressive swelling of the left lateral malleolus accompanied by pain for half a year was presented at our hospital. He had never been treated prior to coming to our hospital. Preoperative imaging revealed a 10 cm × 6 cm mass located in the body of the distal fibula. Pathological biopsies confirmed it was a giant cell tumor. Preoperative examination revealed he had dilated cardiomyopathy with class 3 cardiac function. The cardiologist and anesthesiologist determined that he could tolerate the operation, but the operation should be as short and minimally invasive as possible. With the patient’s consent, we performed a tibiotalar fusion and followed up with him for 2 years, finding no recurrence and a satisfactory recovery.

CONCLUSION

Tibial talus fusion is an effective method for the treatment of distal fibula tumors.

Diffuse Pulmonary Metastases at Presentation of Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Case Report and Synthesis of Literature

CASE

We present a 23-year-old man with acute-on-chronic shoulder pain with an aggressive-appearing, destructive lesion of the left proximal humerus and diffuse lung metastases. Biopsy revealed conventional giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) without sarcomatous differentiation, treated with resection and proximal humerus reconstruction. Without systemic treatment, his pulmonary metastases demonstrated modest spontaneous regression, with no impairment of pulmonary function.

CONCLUSIONS

Although GCTB is known to metastasize to lungs, these deposits most commonly follow local recurrence. We describe a young adult with diffuse pulmonary nodules at initial presentation, although still following an indolent clinical course without the need for additional systemic therapy.

Premalignant Conditions of Bone

Development of malignancy is a multifactorial process, and there are multitude of conditions of bone that may predispose patients to malignancy. Etiologies of malignancy include benign osseous conditions, genetic predisposition, and extrinsic conditions. New-onset pain or growth in a previously stable lesion is that should concern for malignant change and should prompt a diagnostic workup for malignancy.

Metastasis in Sinonasal Region Revealing a Silent Primary: A Series of 2 Cases with Review of Literature

Metastasis to the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses are very rare and only few cases have been reported so far. Metastatic nasal mass with silent primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is even rarer. So are giant cell tumors which rarely affects soft tissues whether superficial or deep. These rarely occur in nasal cavity. We would like to discuss 2 cases-one being a 74 year old female with a solitary asymptomatic extensive metastatic lesion in sinonasal area of silent primary renal cell carcinoma and other being a 38 year old female multiple lytic expansile lesions in facial and skull bones who was previously treated for giant cell tumor of long bone-tibia. We aim to bring their occurrence to notice as they are rare, to highlight importance of these tumors in differential diagnosis of sinonasal masses and treatment options for the same.

Establishment and characterization of NCC-GCTB5-C1: a novel cell line of giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), is a rare intermediate malignant bone tumor with high local infiltrative ability, and is genetically characterized by mutation in the H3-3A gene. Standard treatment is curative surgical tumor resection. GCTB demonstrates both local recurrence and pulmonary metastasis after surgical treatment, and effective systematic chemotherapy is yet to be established. Therefore, development of novel chemotherapies for GCTB is necessary. Although patient-derived tumor cell lines are potent tools for preclinical research, 15 GCTB cell lines have been reported to date, and only four are publicly available. Thus, this study aimed to establish and characterize a novel GCTB cell line for preclinical studies on GCTB. Herein, we described the establishment of a cell line, NCC-GCTB5-C1, from the primary tumor tissue of a patient with GCTB. NCC-GCTB5-C1 was shown to harbor a mutation in the H3-3A gene, which is typical of GCTB; thus, it has useful properties for in vitro studies. We conducted the largest integrated screening analysis of 214 antitumor agents using NCC-GCTB5-C1 along with four GCTB cell lines. Romidepsin (a histone deacetylase inhibitor), camptothecin, and actinomycin D (topoisomerase inhibitors) demonstrated remarkable antitumor effects, suggesting that these antitumor agents are potential therapeutic candidates for GCTB treatment. Therefore, the NCC-GCTB5-C1 cell line could potentially contribute to the elucidation of GCTB pathogenesis and the development of novel GCTB treatments.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Multidisciplinary Medical Management Based on Pathophysiological Mechanisms and Real-World Evidence

Simple Summary

The widely accepted local therapy in extremity giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage; patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Abstract

(1) Despite the benign nature of the giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB), it shows a local recurrence rate of up to 50% and a chance of malignant transformation. The widely accepted local therapy in extremity GCTB is surgery, in the form of extended intralesional curettage with adequate disease clearance and retention of the limb, wherever possible. Denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody directed against the RANKL and associated inhibition of the RANKL pathway, is a relevant therapy option for advanced GCTB, to benefit tumor response and surgical down-staging. (2) The literature review of patients with GCTB treated with denosumab is performed via PubMed, using suitable keywords from January 2009 to January 2021. (3) Current indications for denosumab use are not definitively clear and unambiguous. Most GCTB patients with localized disease can be successfully treated with surgical curettage, and the role of denosumab in preoperative therapy in this patient population remains unclear. (4) However, patients with primary unresectable lesions or metastases may experience long-term clinical and radiological remission and pain control with denosumab treatment, and in this clinical situation, denosumab is currently the treatment of choice.

Metastatic giant cell tumour of bone: a narrative review of management options and approaches

Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive bone neoplasm with a rare tendency to metastasise, most commonly to the lungs. The management of metastatic GCTB (metGCTB) is controversial due to its unpredictable behaviour. Asymptomatic patients should be monitored radiologically and undergo treatment only when disease progression occurs. Surgery is recommended for resectable metGCTB. Denosumab, a monoclonal antibody which inhibits receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand, is recommended for unresectable metGCTB with evidence from phase II trials demonstrating its safety and efficacy. Relapse after denosumab withdrawal may occur and prolonged treatment may be associated with serious adverse events, thus further research is warranted to inform a maintenance regimen with reduced dosing and frequency. Combined denosumab and bisphosphonate therapy has the potential to achieve sustained disease control or remission in unresectable metGCTB without requiring long-term treatment and should be evaluated in prospective trials. Various novel agents have demonstrated in vitro and anecdotal efficacy and warrant further evaluation.

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Single Center Study of 115 cases

•

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a rarely metastasizing, locally aggressive tumor.

•

GCTB recurs frequently after intralesional curettage.

•

Denosumab is a potential neoadjuvant treatment option for borderline resectable lesions.

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive bone tumor that represents about 4–5% of all primary bone tumors. It is characterized by aggressive growth, possible recurrence after surgical treatment and, in rare cases, metastasis. Surgical management is the primary treatment and may include intralesional curettage with adjuvants or, in rare cases, wide resection. In recent years the monoclonal antibody denosumab has been introduced as a potential (neo-)adjuvant systemic treatment option for patients with borderline resectable or unresectable lesions. Currently several studies reported that the use of denosumab prior to curettage possibly increase the risk of local recurrence.

Methods

In this retrospective study we reviewed 115 cases of GCT with a mean follow-up of 65.6 (24–404) months who underwent a surgical treatment with or without preoperative denosumab therapy in our institution. Potential risk factors for LR and complications were analyzed.

Results

The study includes 47 male (40.9%) and 68 female (59.1%) patients with a mean age of 33.9 (10–77) years and a mean follow-up of 65.6 (24–404) months. Denosumab was used in 33 (28.7%) cases, in 14 cases (12.2%) in a neoadjuvant setting and in 17 cases preoperatively before re-curettage (14.8%) after LR. In 105 cases (91.3%) an intralesional curettage was performed. The overall LR rate was 47.8% (55 cases). Patients who underwent intralesional curettage and bone cement augmentation without neoadjuvant denosumab treatment had LR in 42.2% (38/90) of the cases. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant denosumab treatment prior to curettage had LR in 28.6% (4/14). Re-recurrence was frequent in patients with neoadjuvant denosumab treatment who had LR after initial curettage (50%, 8/16). After wide resection and endoprosthetic replacement one case (20%) of local recurrence was detectable (1/5 cases).

Conclusions

GCTB recurs frequently after intralesional curettage and cement augmentation. While denosumab is a potential (neo-)adjuvant treatment option that might be used for lesions that are difficult to resect, surgeons should be aware that LR is still frequent.

Metastasectomy Versus Non-Metastasectomy for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Lung Metastases

Approximately 2% to 9% of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) metastasizes systemically, mainly to the lungs. The biological behaviors and clinical courses of lung metastases are difficult to predict, and their treatment recommendations vary, including metastasectomy and non-metastasectomy with chemotherapy (denosumab, interferon-alfa, bisphosphonates), with radiation therapy, or with observation alone. However, it is unclear whether metastasectomy for GCTB lung metastases decreases the mortality rate of these patients. Therefore, the authors performed this systematic review to compare metastasectomy and non-metastasectomy for GCTB patients with operable lung metastasis. Of the 919 relevant studies, 16 studies (138 patients) were included for analysis; 61.6% of patients had metastasectomy and 38.4% had non-metastasectomy. Analysis showed that mortality rates were similar for the patients who had metastasectomy compared with those who did not; the proportion of patients who died of disease was 7.1% in the metastasectomy group and 17.0% in the non-metastasectomy group, with an overall pooled odds ratio of 0.64 (P=.36). Therefore, physicians should reconsider the potential risks and benefits of metastasectomy for patients with GCTB and lung metastasis, because metastasectomy does not reduce the mortality rate in these patients. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(6):e707-e712.].

Establishment and characterization of novel patient-derived cell lines from giant cell tumor of bone

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive and rarely metastasizing tumor. GCTB is characterized by the presence of unique giant cells and a recurrent mutation in the histone tail of the histone variant H3.3, which is encoded by H3F3A on chromosome 1. GCTB accounts for ~ 5% of primary bone tumors. Although GCTB exhibits an indolent course, it has the potential to develop aggressive behaviors associated with local recurrence and distant metastasis. Currently, complete surgical resection is the only curative treatment, and novel therapeutic strategies are required. Patient-derived cancer cell lines are critical tools for basic and pre-clinical research. However, only a few GCTB cell lines have been reported, and none of them are available from public cell banks. Therefore, we aimed to establish novel GCTB cell lines in the present study. Using curetted tumor tissues of GCTB, we established two cell lines and named them NCC-GCTB2-C1 and NCC-GCTB3-C1. These cells harbored a typical mutation in histones and exhibited slow but constant growth, formed spheroids, and had invasive capabilities. We demonstrated the utility of these cell lines for high-throughput drug screening using 214 anticancer agents. We concluded that NCC-GCTB2-C1 and NCC-GCTB3-C1 cell lines were useful for the in vitro study of GCTB.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of Bone

Simple Summary

According to the 2020 World Health Organization classification, a giant cell tumor of bone is an intermediate malignant bone tumor. Denosumab treatment before curettage should be avoided due to the increased risk of local recurrence. Administration of denosumab before en bloc resection of the giant cell tumors of the pelvis and spine facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for giant cell tumors of the sacrum. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable giant cell tumors of the pelvis, spine, and sacrum. A wait-and-see approach is recommended for lung metastases at first, then denosumab should be administered to the growing lesions. Radiotherapy is not recommended owing to the risk of malignant transformation. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant giant cell tumors of bone.

Abstract

The 2020 World Health Organization classification defined giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) as intermediate malignant tumors. Since the mutated H3F3A was found to be a specific marker for GCTB, it has become very useful in diagnosing GCTB. Curettage is the most common treatment for GCTBs. Preoperative administration of denosumab makes curettage difficult and increases the risk of local recurrence. Curettage is recommended to achieve good functional outcomes, even for local recurrence. For pathological fractures, joints should be preserved as much as possible and curettage should be attempted. Preoperative administration of denosumab for pelvic and spinal GCTBs reduces extraosseous lesions, hardens the tumor, and facilitates en bloc resection. Nerve-sparing surgery after embolization is a possible treatment for sacral GCTBS. Denosumab therapy with or without embolization is indicated for inoperable pelvic, spinal, and sacral GCTBs. It is recommended to first observe lung metastases, then administer denosumab for growing lesions. Radiotherapy is associated with a risk of malignant transformation and should be limited to cases where surgery is impossible and denosumab, zoledronic acid, or embolization is not available. Local recurrence after 2 years or more should be indicative of malignant transformation. This review summarizes the treatment approaches for non-malignant and malignant GCTBs.

Risk factors and oncological outcomes of pulmonary metastasis in patients with giant cell tumor of bone

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone has a rare potential for metastatic spread. This study aimed at evaluating the incidence of chest metastases in GCT and their oncological outcome and identifying possible risk factors.

METHODS

Medical records of 466 (313 de novo and 153 recurrent) patients with primary GCT of bone were retrospectively reviewed. Fifteen (3.2%) patients developed chest metastasis. Time from diagnosis of the primary bone lesion to the diagnosis of metastasis, treatment modalities of metastasis, and the course of treatment were revised. The functional outcome was evaluated using the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scoring system, and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

This study included 7 males and 8 females with a mean age of 27.3 ± 7.9 years. The most common site of the primary tumor was the distal femur. All fifteen patients were recurrent cases. The mean follow-up period was 67.7 ± 33.2 months. Chest metastasis was diagnosed after a mean time of 28.1 ± 28.9 months from the initial diagnosis of the bone lesion. One patient died of disease (DOD) 18 months after the surgical intervention. The incidence of chest metastasis in recurrent cases was 9.8%, while de novo cases did not develop chest metastasis, P < 0.001. Previous curettage was associated with a higher incidence of chest metastasis (14.6%) compared to previous resection (4.2%), P = 0.03.

CONCLUSIONS

Chest metastasis following GCT of bone is rare. Risk factors include recurrent cases, especially following previous curettage. Patients have a good prognosis and a low mortality rate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective.

The current standing on the use of denosumab in giant cell tumour of the bone

Giant cell tumour of the bone (GCTB) has been classically treated surgically. With the advent of denosumab, there is potential to use it as a targeted therapy to downstage the tumour and control its progression. Like all new therapies, the dosage, duration, and long-term effects of treatment can only be determined over the time through numerous trials and errors. The current recommendation of use of the monoclonal antibody is 3-4 months of neoadjuvant denosumab in patients with advanced GCTB for cases who were not candidates for primary curettage initially, and prolonged use for surgically unsalvageable GCTB. The use of Denosumab in the adjuvant setting to prevent recurrence is not established.

Preoperative CT for prediction of local recurrence after curettage of giant cell tumor of bone

•Preoperative CT images of GCTBs have value in prognostic prediction.•Certain features of GCTBs on CT images are related to local recurrence.•Our models' predictions for GCTB patients accepting extensive curettage are good.

Giant Cell Tumor of the Ring Finger Distal Phalanx

Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a benign but locally aggressive neoplasm generally located in the epiphysis and metaphysis of the long bones. Its occurrence in the bones of the hand is rare. Giant cell tumors occurring in the hand account for only 2% of all the GCTs reported. The epimetaphyseal region of short long bones is a common site of GCTs in the hand; however, a phalangeal GCT originating in the distal phalanx is extremely rare. We present the clinical, radiological and histopathological findings of a case of GCT of the distal phalanx of the left ring finger presenting with a fungating mass and treated with en bloc resection by disarticulation of the distal interphalangeal joint.

The role of Denosumab in joint preservation for patients with giant cell tumour of bone

AIMS

Local recurrence remains a challenging and common problem following curettage and joint-sparing surgery for giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB). We previously reported a 15% local recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 30 months in 20 patients with high-risk GCTB treated with neoadjuvant Denosumab. The aim of this study was to determine if this initial favourable outcome following the use of Denosumab was maintained with longer follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with GCTB of the limb considered high-risk for unsuccessful joint salvage, due to minimal periarticular and subchondral bone, large soft tissue mass, or pathological fracture, were treated with Denosumab followed by extended intralesional curettage with the goal of preserving the joint surface. Patients were followed for local recurrence, metastasis, and secondary sarcoma.

RESULTS

A total of 25 patients with a mean age of 33.8 years (18 to 67) with high-risk GCTB received median six cycles of Denosumab before surgery. Tumours occurred most commonly around the knee (17/25, 68%). The median follow-up was 57 months (interquartile range (IQR) 13 to 88). The joint was salvaged in 23 patients (92%). Two required knee arthroplasty due to intra-articular fracture and arthritis. Local recurrence developed in 11 patients (44%) at a mean of 32.5 months (3 to 75) following surgery, of whom four underwent repeat curettage and joint salvage. One patient developed secondary osteosarcoma and another benign GCT lung metastases.

CONCLUSION

The use of Denosumab for joint salvage was associated with a higher than expected rate of local recurrence at 44%. Neoadjuvant Denosumab for joint-sparing procedures should be considered with caution in light of these results. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(1):184-191.

Pulmonary metastasis of giant cell tumour: a retrospective study of three hundred and ten cases

BACKGROUND

Giant cell tumour (GCT) is an invasive benign bone tumour, and the incidence of pulmonary metastasis is rare. We are aiming to analyze risk factors of pulmonary metastasis and clinical prognosis for giant cell tumour patients with pulmonary metastasis.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective study of 310 patients with GCT between December 2004 and December 2016. Risk factors of pulmonary metastasis were analyzed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Then, the influence of risk factors of overall LR (local recurrence), recurrent tumor at presentation, LR after our therapy, and with soft tissue mass on the pulmonary metastasis-free survival rates was analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up of the present cohort was 45.6 ± 35.3 months (median, 36.6 months; range, 6.1-193.4 months). Eighteen (5.8%) of 310 patients developed pulmonary metastasis. The average interval from surgery of primary tumour to detection of pulmonary metastasis was 15 months. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed overall local recurrence was the independent risk factor of developing pulmonary metastasis. Among 18 patients with pulmonary metastasis, sixteen cases had history of local recurrence (88.9%, 16/18), including eleven (68.8%, 11/16) with local recurrence at presentation before receiving our therapy and seven (43.8%, 7/16) with local recurrence after receiving treatment in our hospital. Time to local recurrence had obvious difference between patients with and without pulmonary metastasis. Patients with pulmonary metastasis were prone to recur earlier. Furthermore, overall local recurrence, local recurrence after our therapy, recurrent tumor at presentation, and tumour with a soft tissue mass showed statistical differences in the pulmonary metastasis-free survival rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Giant cell tumour patients with soft tissue mass and overall local recurrence are prone to develop pulmonary metastasis. Although giant cell tumour is a benign tumor, more attention should be paid to the problem of pulmonary metastatic lesions, and chest CT scan should be recommended during follow-up.

Outcome of lung metastases due to bone giant cell tumor initially managed with observation

Background

The outcomes of patients with lung metastases from giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) vary from spontaneous regression to uncontrolled growth. To investigate whether observation is an appropriate first-line management approach for patients with lung metastases from GCTB, we evaluated the outcomes of patients who were initially managed by observation.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 22 patients with lung metastases from histologically confirmed GCTB who received observation as a first-line treatment approach. The median follow-up period was 116 months.

Results

Disease progression occurred in 12 patients (54.5%). The median interval between the discovery of lung metastases and progression was 8 months. Eight patients underwent metastasectomy following initial observation. The median interval between the discovery of lung metastases and treatment by metastasectomy was 13.5 months. None of the patients experienced spontaneous regression. Of the 22 patients, 36.4% needed a metastasectomy, and 9.1% required denosumab treatment during the course of the follow-up period. Disease progression occurred in 45.5% of the 11 patients with lung nodules ≤ 5 mm, while all five of the patients with lung nodules > 5 mm experienced disease progression. Progression-free survival was significantly worse in the group with lung nodules > 5 mm compared to the group with lung nodules ≤ 5 mm (p = 0.022).

Conclusions

Observation is a safe first-line method of managing patients with lung metastases from GCTB. According to radiological imaging, approximately half of the patients progressed, and approximately half required a metastasectomy or denosumab treatment. However, patients with lung nodules > 5 mm should receive careful observation because of the high rate of disease progression in this group.

Sacral Giant Cell Tumor-Induced Cauda Equina Syndrome: Case Report with Successful Management

Sacral giant cell tumor (GCT) is a rare entity. It often presents late after massive enlargement of tumor. Here we are reporting a case of sacral GCT treated successfully at our institute. A 30-year-old male patient presented with paraplegia, significant sensory disturbance below L2 level, along with severe vesicorectal dysfunction. On imaging, giant mass was seen filling the sacrum with homogenous enhancement and flow voids from L5 level to S4 level. The patient underwent surgical exploration with L4–5 decompressive laminectomy, near-total resection of tumor, and lumboiliac fixation. The patient recovered symptomatically in postoperative period. Sacral GCT is a rare but treatable lesion. Its presentation as sudden cauda equina syndrome is rare, but final management should be aggressive with en bloc resection and fixation.

Denosumab in Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: Current Status and Pitfalls

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANK ligand for treatment of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB). Clinical trials and case series have demonstrated that denosumab is relevant to beneficial tumor response and surgical down-staging in patients of GCTB. However, these trials or case series have limitations with a short follow-up. Recent increasing studies revealed that denosumab probably increased the local recurrence risk in patients treated with curettage. This may be caused by the thicken bone margin of tumor that trapped tumor cells from curettage. The direct bone formation by tumor cells in the margin after denosumab treatment also contributed to the local recurrence. in vitro studies showed denosumab resulted in a cytostatic instead of a true cytotoxic response on neoplastic stromal cells. More importantly, denosumab-treated GCTB exhibited morphologic overlap with malignancy, and a growing number of patients of malignant transformation of GCTB during denosumab treatment have been reported. The optimal duration, long term safety, maintenance dose, and optimum indications remain to be elucidated. With these concerns in mind, this review warns that the denosumab therapy of GCTB should be applied with caution.

Outcomes of En bloc resection followed by reconstruction of giant cell tumor around knee and distal radius. A case series

INTRODUCTION

This study is to evaluate the outcomes of En bloc resection and reconstruction in patients with GCT of the bone around the knee and in the distal radius.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed 41 cases of GCT of the bone that was treated by En bloc resection around the knee joint and in the distal radius from 2011 to 2018. The local recurrence, metastases, complications and functional score were evaluated for each operation technique.

RESULTS

The average of MSTS score for all group was 78% (excellent). In the knee joint, the megaprostheses group had an excellent MSTS score of78.9% and good 21.1%. The MAMC group had an excellent MSTS score of40.0%, good 50.0% and fair 10.0%. One patient in the megaprostheses group had metastasis to the lung and 1 patient in the knee arthrodesis group has a recurrence. Infection occurred in 2 cases of megaprostheses while only 1 case in MAMC. Both of the groups in knee joint GCT had 1 patient with implant loosening. In the distal radius, FVFG group had an excellent MSTS score 100% and NVFG group had an excellent score 77.7%, good 11.1% and fair 11.1%. One patient in the NVFG group had an infection, 1 patient has implant loosening and another one patient had graft failure. Two patients in the NVFG group had a recurrence. No metastasis was found in both of the group types of surgery in distal radius GCT.

CONCLUSION

Functional outcome of a patient with GCT of the bone after En bloc resection and reconstruction with the above techniques had comparable results with previous studies.

Denosumab treatment for giant-cell tumor of bone: a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Denosumab is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) that specifically inhibits tumor-associated bone lysis through the RANKL pathway and has been used as neoadjuvant therapy for giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in surgical as well as non-surgical cases. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature, therefore, is to investigate: (1) demographic characteristics of patients affected by GCTBs treated with denosumab and the clinical impact, as well as, possible complications associated with its use (2) oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence rate (LRR) and development of lung metastasis, and (3) characteristics of its treatment effect in terms of clinical, radiological, and histological response.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and COCHRANE search including the following terms and Boolean operators: "Denosumab" AND "primary bone tumor", "denosumab" AND "giant cell tumor", "denosumab" AND "treatment", and finally, "denosumab" AND "giant cell tumor" AND "treatment" since 2000. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 19 articles were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed using STROBE for the assessment of observational studies.

RESULTS

A total of 1095 patients were included across all 19 studies. Across all the studies included, there were 615 females and 480 males. The mean patient age was 33.7 ± 8.3 years when starting the denosumab treatment. The pooled weighted local recurrence rate was 9% (95% CI 6-12%) and the pooled weighted metastases rate was 3% (95% CI 1-7%). The most common adverse event was fatigue and muscular pain. Radiologic response was estimated to occur in 66-100% of the patients. A significant reduction in pain under denosumab treatment was reported in seven studies and additional improvement in function and mobility was reported by several authors. Only two studies reported musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) scores which were better after denosumab treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of denosumab as an adjuvant treatment of GCTB has shown a positive but variable histological response with consistent radiological changes and several types of adverse effects. There is a positive clinical response in terms of pain relief with decrease on the morbidity of surgical procedures to be performed. Finally, oncological outcomes are disparate with neither effect on metastatic disease nor local recurrence rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Common Tumors and Tumor-like Lesions of the Shoulder

Shoulder lesions range from tumor-like lesions such as simple bone cysts to aggressive high-grade sarcomas. The clinical presentation is often nonspecific with shoulder pain as the primary complaint, which may lead to a delayed or missed diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis or a poorly planned biopsy of a malignant shoulder lesion can have a detrimental effect on the patient's prognosis and treatment options. Because the initial patient assessment is crucial for successful treatment, knowledge of the key features of common shoulder tumors and tumor-like conditions can help determine the diagnosis and treatment plan. This article reviews the key features and treatment options of the more commonly encountered benign and malignant shoulder bone and soft-tissue tumors and tumor-like conditions.

Measurement of morphological parameters of giant cell tumor of bone in the knee

The aim of the present study was to characterize the morphological parameters of giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) in the knee. The imaging data of 250 patients with GCTB in the knee were retrospectively reviewed, and the morphological parameters were analyzed. The study included 137 cases with GCTB in the distal femur and 113 cases with GCTB in the proximal tibia. The maximal longitudinal diameter of the tumor was 6.616±2.322 cm in the femur group and 5.738±2.278 cm in the tibia group (P=0.003). The maximal transverse diameter in the two groups was 4.865±1.525 and 4.313±1.309 cm, respectively (P=0.003). The shortest distance from the articular surface (SDAS) in the two groups was 0.381±0.404 and 0.280±0.328 cm, respectively (P=0.035), whereas the longest distance from the articular surface in the two groups was 6.924±2.135 and 5.878±1.825 cm, respectively (P=0.001). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the range of SDAS (P=0.043). Additionally, the incidence of pathological fractures in the femur was higher compared with that in the tibia (P=0.001), and the incidence of pathological fractures in the two groups gradually increased with the increase in lesion diameter. GCTB in the distal femur was larger compared with that in the proximal tibia, whereas GCTB in the tibia was closer to the articular surface compared with that in the femur. Furthermore, the incidence of pathological fractures in the femur was higher compared with that in the tibia.

Wide Resection and Iliac Crest Arthrodesis for Multiply Recurrent Giant Cell Tumor of First Metatarsal

Case

Giant cell tumor of bone is a benign, aggressive neoplasm commonly arising in the femur, tibia, and distal radius and less commonly in the hands and feet. We describe a 22-year-old woman who underwent wide resection of multiply recurrent first metatarsal giant cell tumor and reconstruction with iliac crest arthrodesis.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports of managing multiply recurrent giant cell tumor of the first metatarsal. The patient was without pain and exercising without difficulty 18 months following surgery. This method appears useful for reconstructing the foot following multiply recurrent giant cell tumor of the metatarsal.

Effect of bisphosphonates on local recurrence of giant cell tumor of bone: a meta-analysis

Background

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive tumor, and its postoperative recurrence remains a problem. The present meta-analysis aimed to analyze the effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) on local recurrence of GCTB.

Methods

Seven case-control studies were included by computerized searches of bibliographic databases (PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, ISI Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure). The pooled adjusted ORs were calculated to evaluate the local recurrence of GCTB.

Results

The BP group presented significantly lower total local recurrence rate than the control group in GCTB (P<0.01). Subgroup analysis shows BP group presented significantly lower local recurrence than the control group in GCTB with different tumor grades (P<0.05). In patients who underwent intralesional curettage, a significantly lower local recurrence rate was found in the BP group compared with the control group (P<0.01), but no significance was found for patients who underwent wide resection (P=0.16). None of the included studies described severe adverse effects related to BPs.

Conclusion

The results confirmed the effect of BPs on reducing the local recurrence of GCTB, and the effect is not influenced by the tumor grades. BPs are benefit for the patients who underwent intralesional curettage but not recommended for those who underwent wide resection.

Increased Risk of Lung Metastases in Patients with Giant Cell Bone Tumors: A Systematic Review

Giant cell tumors of the bone are rare, usually benign, tumors consisting of large, multinucleated bone cells. Remarkably, these tumors are characterized by aggressive growth. They tend to recur frequently and, in rare cases, metastasize to the lungs. Previous studies tried to identify risk factors for lung metastasis by giant cell bone tumors. Those studies reported different results due to a small number of patients. Therefore, a particularly high risk associated with this type of bone tumor prompted this systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk factors for the development of lung metastases. The risk factors for lung metastasis by giant cell bone tumors searched for in this study were gender, age, lung metastasis and recurrence period, follow-up time, primary or recurrent tumor, Campanacci grading, tumor localization, disease course, treatment of primary and recurrent tumors, and pulmonary metastases treated by surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. This meta-analysis identified the features outlined above by comparing the groups of patients with giant cell bone tumors and lung metastases with the control group consisting of patients without lung metastases. The search for suitable studies revealed 63 publications with a total of 4,295 patients with giant cell bone tumors. Of these, 247 (5.8%; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 5.1-6.5%) patients had lung metastases. Further, the risk factors for lung metastases were the following: recurrence (p < 0.0001), lung metastasis time (p < 0.0001), Campanacci grade II (p = 0.028) and grade III (p = 0.006), localization in the lower limbs (p = 0.0007), curettage (p = 0.0005), and local irradiation of the primary tumor (p = 0.008). All studies showed a high-risk bias due to the absence of blinding of the participants, personnel, and outcome assessment. Special attention should be paid to tumor recurrence in the long follow-up time, since more advanced giant cell bone tumors, particularly in lower extremities, tend to reoccur and metastasize to the lung. Surgical treatment and local irradiation should be performed thoughtfully, with extended follow-up periods.

Giant cell tumor of the dorsal vertebrae. Case report

Introduction: Giant cell tumors are rarely observed in the thoracic vertebrae. They appear between the ages of 20 and 50, more often in women. The purpose of this case report is to make known the clinical characteristics, the presentation and the treatment used to solve this pathology.Case presentation: 37-year-old female patient who presented a clinical picture of seven days of dyspnea, cough with white expectoration, high temperature, paraparesis, loss of control in the sphincters and weight loss. High-resolution computed tomography of the thorax showed a right paraspinal mass located in posterior mediastinum at T8-T9 level. Surgical excision of the tumor was decided by right posterolateral thoracotomy at the seventh intercostal space and free surgical margins. The histopathology report described giant cell tumor grade II. The patient did not require chemotherapy and had a satisfactory evolution.Discussion: This case has a non-specific presentation, as it shows evidence of pain, tumor and functional impotence of the involved region. Surgery is the best treatment and consists of tumor excision, leaving wide margins to prevent recurrences.Conclusions: Giant cell tumors involving the lungs and thoracic vertebrae are underdiagnosed due to their nonspecific symptoms and the limited literature currently available.

Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases from bone giant cell tumour

PURPOSE

There are conflicting reports on the effect of denosumab on lung metastases in patients with giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone. To address these reports, we performed this study to determine if denosumab prevents lung metastasis and to evaluate univariate and multivariate predictors for lung metastases in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively studied 381 GCT patients with surgery alone and 30 GCT patients with surgery and denosumab administration. The median follow-up was 85.2 months (IQR, 54.2-124.4 months). We evaluated lung metastases and local recurrences, univariate and multivariate predictors for lung metastases, response, and adverse events of denosumab administration.

RESULTS

The occurrence of lung metastases was similar (surgery alone 4.7%, 18 patients; denosumab administration 3.3%, 1 patient); however, the occurrence of local recurrences was significantly higher in the patients with denosumab administration. Denosumab administration was not an important predictor for lung metastases; Campanacci stage and type of surgery were the only univariate predictors for lung metastases, and type of surgery and local recurrence were the only multivariate predictors for lung metastases. Histology showed viable tumour in all tumor specimens of the patients with denosumab administration.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab does not decrease the risk of lung metastases in patients with bone GCT; the only important predictors for lung metastases in these patients are type of surgery and local recurrence. However, because the number of patients with lung metastases was small for a multivariate analysis, the possibility of denosumab's effect could not be completely eliminated.

Safety and efficacy of denosumab in the treatment of pulmonary metastatic giant cell tumor of bone

Background

Giant cell tumor (GCT) of bone is an intermittent and locally aggressive tumor with increasing pulmonary metastatic potential. In this study, we evaluated the interim clinical outcome of denosumab in patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively reviewed seven patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT who received denosumab treatment after local tumor surgery during January 2014 and July 2016. Denosumab treatment for all patients lasted for at least 12 months. Serial chest computerized tomography scan was used to monitor the drug response and RECIST 1.1 standard was used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy.

Results

All patients experienced chest pain relief in the first month of treatment. Three patients showed partial response. Four patients got stable disease after denosumab treatment. Adverse events included one patient with hypocalcemia and two patients with fever. No treatment-related deaths were reported. No patient with metastatic disease progression was found during an average of 28.6 months follow-up period.

Conclusion

We presented a promising interim clinical outcome using denosumab to treat patients with pulmonary metastatic GCT. Denosumab might be considered as the first-line treatment for patients with inoperable metastatic pulmonary GCT. However, Phase II clinical study with larger number of patients and longer follow-up period is needed to detect the further efficacy and safety of this drug for lung metastatic GCT.

Selective Arterial Embolization for the Treatment of Sacral and Pelvic Giant Cell Tumor: A Systematic Review

Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive tumor with a certain distant metastatic rate. For sacral GCT (SGCT) and pelvic GCT (PGCT), surgery has its limitations, especially for unresectable or recurrent tumors. Selective arterial embolization (SAE) is reported to be an option for treatment in several cases, but there are few systematic reviews on the effects of SAE on SGCT and/or PGCT. Medline and Embase databases were searched for eligible English articles. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were conducted before searching. All the clinical factors were measured by SPSS software, with P-values ≤0.05 considered statistically significant. A total of 9 articles were retrieved, including 44 patients receiving SAE ranging from 1 to 10 times. During the mean follow-up period of 85.8 months, the radiographic response rate was 81.8%, with a local control and overall survival rate of 75% and 81.8%, respectively. No bowel, bladder, or sexual dysfunction was observed. Three patients developed distant metastases and finally died. Patients with primary tumors tended to have better prognosis than those with recurrence (P = 0.039). The favorable outcomes of SAE suggest that it may be an alternative treatment for SGCT and PGCT patients for whom surgery is not appropriate.

Development and validation of a prognostic index to predict pulmonary metastasis of giant cell tumor of bone

Purpose

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an intermittent tumor with a low probability of pulmonary metastasis. Our aim was to investigate the risk factors and establish a nomogram predictive model for GCTB pulmonary metastasis.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated GCTB patients at our center from 1991 to 2014. The cohort was randomized into training and validation sets. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors of pulmonary metastasis. A nomogram was established. Internal validation was achieved based on ROC curve and C-index values in the validation set. Decision curve analysis was performed to assess the clinical performance of the nomogram.

Results

417 patients were studied, including benign and malignant GCTBs. The average follow up was 79 months. Pulmonary metastases were observed in 27 cases. Four independent risk factors were identified: malignancy, tumor bearing time, times of recurrence and tumor size. A nomogram was developed to predict pulmonary metastasis with C-index values of 0.857 and 0.785 in the training and validation groups. In the decision curve analysis, patients could benefit from the nomogram, which differentiates patients at high risk for pulmonary metastasis and avoids unnecessary examination. According to the nomogram, patients with final risks of more than 0.06 should be scheduled for further chest scans.

Conclusion

Malignancy, tumor bearing time, times of recurrence and tumor size were independent risk factors for pulmonary metastasis in GCTB patients. The nomogram can accurately predict the risk of pulmonary metastasis and help doctors to make clinical decisions for further chest examinations.