Analysis of management decisions and outcomes of a weekly multidisciplinary pediatric tumor board meeting in Uganda

Multidisciplinary approach to cancer care in Rwanda: the role of tumour board meetings

Introduction

Cancer treatment is complex and necessitates a multidisciplinary approach. Tumour Board Meetings (TBMs) provide a multidisciplinary platform for health care providers to communicate about treatment plans for patients. TBMs improve patient care, treatment outcomes and, ultimately, patient satisfaction by facilitating information exchange and regular communication among all parties involved in a patient's treatment. This study describes the current status of case conference meetings in Rwanda including their structure, process and outcomes.

Methods

The study included four hospitals providing cancer care in Rwanda. Data gathered included patients' diagnosis, number of attendance and pre-TBM treatment plan, as well as changes made during TBMs, including diagnostic and management plan changes.

Results

From 128 meetings that took place at the time of the study, Rwanda Military Hospital hosted 45 (35%) meetings, King Faisal Hospital had 32 (25%), Butare University Teaching Hospital (CHUB) had 32 (25%) and Kigali University Teaching Hospital (CHUK) had 19 (15%). In all hospitals, General Surgery 69 (29%) was the leading speciality in presenting cases. The top three most presented disease site were head and neck 58 (24%), gastrointestinal 28 (16%) and cervix 28 (12%). Most (85% (202/239)) presented cases sought inputs from TBMs on management plan. On average, two oncologists, two general surgeons, one pathologist and one radiologist attended each meeting.

Conclusion

TBMs in Rwanda are increasingly getting recognised by clinicians. To influence the quality of cancer care provided to Rwandans, it is crucial to build on this enthusiasm and enhance TBMs conduct and efficiency.

A retrospective evaluation of the presentation, prognostic factors and outcomes of neuroblastoma in Ugandan children

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor of childhood. The complete burden and outcomes in Uganda are unknown. The study was a multicenter retrospective chart review of children aged between 0 to 15 years diagnosed with NB from 2010 to 2020. Demographic, clinical and tumor-related characteristics were extracted for analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox regression models were used to determine the one-year overall survival (OS) and identify prognostic factors. Seventy-five patients were evaluated, with a median age at diagnosis of 48 months (IQR 26-108 months). Fever (74.7%), weight loss (74.7%), high blood pressure (70.3%) and abdominal swelling/mass (65.3%) were the most common features at diagnosis. Suprarenal tumors (52%) and stage 4 disease (70.7%) were also common. The one-year OS was 60.0% (95%CI 56.8%; 64.3%) with a median survival time of 12.6 months (95% CI: 8.1; 20.8). The one-year OS for non-metastatic and metastatic disease was 67.3% and 42.6% (p = 0.11) respectively. Leukocytosis (p < 0.001) at diagnosis was of prognostic significance while clinical remission after induction chemotherapy (p < 0.001) provided survival advantages. Children who received maintenance chemotherapy had a longer median survival time of 38.5 months (range 10.8-69.5). Age (p = 0.001), lung metastasis (p < 0.001), and leukocytosis (p < 0.001) remained significant on multivariate analysis. In this Ugandan study, leukocytosis was a clinical predictor of prognosis, metastatic disease had management challenges and maintenance chemotherapy prolonged the survival time but not OS.

Evidence-based surgical guidelines for treating children with Wilms tumor in low-resource settings

BACKGROUND

Survival of Wilms tumor (WT) is > 90% in high-resource settings but < 30% in low-resource settings. Adapting a standardized surgical approach to WT is challenging in low-resource settings, but a local control strategy is crucial to improving outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

Provide resource-sensitive recommendations for the surgical management of WT.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE through July 7, 2020, and used the GRADE approach to assess evidence and recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Initiation of treatment should be expedited, and surgery should be done in a high-volume setting. Cross-sectional imaging should be done to optimize preoperative planning. For patients with typical clinical features of WT, biopsy should not be done before chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy should precede surgical resection. Also, resection should include a large transperitoneal laparotomy, adequate lymph node sampling, and documentation of staging findings. For WT with tumor thrombus in the inferior vena cava, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be given before en bloc resection of the tumor and thrombus and evaluation for viable tumor thrombus. For those with bilateral WT, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be given for 6-12 weeks. Neither routine use of complex hilar control techniques during nephron-sparing surgery nor nephron-sparing resection for unilateral WT with a normal contralateral kidney is recommended. When indicated, postoperative radiotherapy should be administered within 14 days of surgery. Post-chemotherapy pulmonary oligometastasis should be resected when feasible, if local protocols allow omission of whole-lung irradiation in patients with nonanaplastic histology stage IV WT with pulmonary metastasis without evidence of extrapulmonary metastasis.

CONCLUSION

We provide evidence-based recommendations for the surgical management of WT, considering the benefits/risks associated with limited-resource settings.

Haematological malignancies in sub-Saharan Africa: east Africa as an example for improving care

Haematological malignancies account for almost 10% of all cancers diagnosed in sub-Saharan Africa, although the exact incidences and treatment outcomes are difficult to discern because population-based cancer registries in the region are still underdeveloped. More research on haematological malignancies in sub-Saharan Africa is required to establish whether these cancers have a natural history similar to those diagnosed in high-income countries, about which more is known. Several factors negatively affect the outcome of haematological malignancies in sub-Saharan Africa, showcasing a need for improved understanding of the clinicobiological profile of these cancers to facilitate prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and appropriate treatment through increased capacity building, infrastructure, community awareness, coordinated resource mobilisation, and collaboration across the world. The east African governments have pooled resources for common investments to tackle non-communicable diseases, developing the East Africa's Centres of Excellence for Skills and Tertiary Education project funded by the African Development Bank, an initiative that could be replicated for the care of haematological malignancies in other countries in sub-Saharan Africa. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Clinical audit of retinoblastoma management: a retrospective single-institution study

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to identify the frequency of death, metastasis, enucleation, and use of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) among retinoblastoma patients. The secondary aim was to determine whether any events were associated with suboptimal clinical management to identify areas for clinical care improvement.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with retinoblastoma between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2015, at The Hospital for Sick Children were included. Medical records of eligible patients underwent a comprehensive 2-part review. First, a chart review collected diagnostic details, treatment course, and occurrence of 4 events: death, metastasis, use of EBRT, and enucleation. Next, events were reviewed in detail, and a multidisciplinary committee reached consensus on cases managed suboptimally.

RESULTS

The study included 209 patients (292 eyes). There were 8 deaths, 11 metastases, 177 enucleations (143 primary, 34 secondary), and 8 uses of EBRT. Thirteen patients were reviewed by the multidisciplinary committee, which confirmed that 5 of these patients had events associated with suboptimal clinical management. Three patients developed metastases leading to death (misdiagnosis and mismanagement of trilateral retinoblastoma [1], parental refusal of enucleation [1], and inaccurate histopathology after primary enucleation [1]). One patient developed extraocular extension related to scleral invasion following aggressive focal therapy. One patient underwent secondary enucleation for a Group B eye related to mismanagement of a treatment complication.

DISCUSSION

Deaths, metastases, and enucleations with documented instances of suboptimal care highlighted a need to enhance medical team and patient communication, histopathology interpretation, laser treatment guidelines, and trilateral retinoblastoma management. Routine clinical audit of retinoblastoma management can identify areas for clinical practice change.

Pediatric Solid Tumor Care and Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Low- and Middle-Income Countries in Southeast Asia

PURPOSE

Pediatric solid tumors require coordinated multidisciplinary specialist care. However, expertise and resources to conduct multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs) are lacking in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We aimed to profile the landscape of pediatric solid tumor care and practices and perceptions on MDTBs among pediatric solid tumor units (PSTUs) in Southeast Asian LMICs.

METHODS

Using online surveys, availability of specialty manpower and MDTBs among PSTUs was first determined. From the subset of PSTUs with MDTBs, one pediatric surgeon and one pediatric oncologist from each center were queried using 5-point Likert scale questions adapted from published questionnaires.

RESULTS

In 37 (80.4%) of 46 identified PSTUs, availability of pediatric-trained specialists was as follows: oncologists, 94.6%; surgeons, 91.9%; radiologists, 54.1%; pathologists, 40.5%; radiation oncologists, 29.7%; nuclear medicine physicians, 13.5%; and nurses, 81.1%. Availability of pediatric-trained surgeons, radiologists, and pathologists was significantly associated with the existence of MDTBs (P = .037, .005, and .022, respectively). Among 43 (89.6%) of 48 respondents from 24 PSTUs with MDTBs, 90.5% of oncologists reported > 50% oncology-dedicated workload versus 22.7% of surgeons. Views on benefits and barriers did not significantly differ between oncologists and surgeons. The majority agreed that MDTBs helped to improve accuracy of treatment recommendations and team competence. Complex cases, insufficient radiology and pathology preparation, and need for supplementary investigations were the top barriers.

CONCLUSION

This first known profile of pediatric solid tumor care in Southeast Asia found that availability of pediatric-trained subspecialists was a significant prerequisite for pediatric MDTBs in this region. Most PSTUs lacked pediatric-trained pathologists and radiologists. Correspondingly, gaps in radiographic and pathologic diagnoses were the most common limitations for MDTBs. Greater emphasis on holistic multidisciplinary subspecialty development is needed to advance pediatric solid tumor care in Southeast Asia.