The Use of in situ Simulation in Healthcare Education: Current Perspectives

Crisis management in the operating room: A systematic review of simulation training to develop non-technical skills

AIMS

Crises in the operating room, often resulting from human factors, endangers patient safety. Simulation-based training to develop non-technical skills shows promise in managing these crises. This review examines the simulation techniques, targeted healthcare professionals, non-technical skills, crisis scenarios, and evaluation metrics used in operating room crisis management training.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo and Web of Science databases were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2004 and March 2024.

REVIEW METHODS

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review protocol has been registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/7bsc8). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) The study population comprised healthcare and medical professionals or students; (2) the intervention involved a simulated learning or training experience; (3) the outcomes focused on non-technical skills or crew resource management; (4) the training setting was the operating room (simulated or real); and (5) the learning scenarios depicted a crisis or an adverse event.

RESULTS

This systematic review identified 29 eligible articles. The findings highlight the predominance of high-fidelity simulations, primarily targeting medical staff rather than nurses or other healthcare professionals. Training focused on communication, teamwork, situation awareness, problem solving, and decision making, with scenarios mostly addressing patient deterioration. Assessments reached up to Kirkpatrick's Level 3, demonstrating a positive training impact through learners' reactions and learning metrics rather than behavior and organizational results.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their effectiveness, current training practices exhibit limitations. Incorporating nurses and other paramedical staff in interprofessional training, as well as emphasizing team-related scenarios and evaluating behavioral changes in practice, could enhance training effectiveness. This has implications for interprofessional healthcare education and skills transfer to real-world settings, ultimately improving patient safety.

Communication training for effective Goals of Patient Care conversations in acute care: An integrative review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and synthesize research that has investigated interventions to train registered health professionals to effectively communicate with patients in acute settings who are establishing their goals of care, to develop an understanding of current practices and their effectiveness.

DESIGN

Integrative review.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, CINAHL, and ProQuest, searched from the date each database was available to December 2023. Forty-seven (n = 47) research studies investigating interventions to train registered health professionals to effectively communicate with patients in acute settings who are establishing their goals of care were critically appraised for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute Quality Appraisal Framework. Minimum essential criteria and scores were agreed prior to appraisal.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were excluded due to methodological quality. The 19 studies included comprised quasi experimental (n = 9), qualitative (n = 4), RCT (n = 2), text and opinion (n = 1), and mixed methods (n = 3). From these included studies 4 themes with embedded sub-themes were derived: (a) delivery of training programs, (b) clinician outcomes, (c) patient outcomes, and (d) system outcomes.

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE RESULTS

Communication training is essential and beneficial however its effectiveness depends on overcoming existing barriers, providing continuous learning opportunities, and embedding these into clinical practice. Addressing these factors will ensure that clinicians and healthcare organizations can improve patient and system outcomes. When clinicians and organizations prioritize regular, context-specific communication training, which promotes the use of conversation guides and available technologies, Goals of Patient Care conversations are more likely to be embedded in practice, promoting effective and patient-centered communication.

Military Medical Simulations-Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

The military employs a wide variety of training paradigms to prepare a ready medical force. Simulation-based training is prominently used in the military for all roles of care to provide the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to render care from the battlefield to the hospital. The purpose of this scoping review is to synthesize the body of research in military healthcare simulation, highlight trends in the literature, and identify research gaps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis process, the databases of PubMed, Google Scholar, and targeted conferences were searched for articles focused on simulation-based training in the military healthcare community. Inclusion criteria required that the studies assessed a healthcare simulation intervention and had military participants. Data were gathered on population parameters (branch of service and provider level) as well as study parameter (simulation modality, medical domain, and outcome measures). Outcome measures were categorized according to the Kirkpatrick model of training evaluation.

RESULTS

A total of 43 articles met inclusion criteria. Article summaries and descriptive data on the participant populations and study parameters are provided in Tables 1, 2, and Supplementary Table S1.

CONCLUSIONS

Participant populations were inclusive of all the services and roles of care, suggesting appropriate representation of the broad military healthcare community. The majority of literature has studied physical simulations, such as manikins or task trainers. Few studies employed augmented or virtual reality as the training intervention, likely because of the nascency of the technology. Trauma care was the focus of 65% of the studies; this is attributable to the criticality of trauma care within battlefield medicine and casualty response. Related to study outcomes, participant reactions, such as usability and user acceptance, and immediate learning outcomes were heavily studied. Retention and behavioral changes were rarely studied and represent a significant research gap. Future research assessing mixed reality technologies would be beneficial to determine whether the technology warrants inclusion in programs of instruction. Finally, studies with outcome measures including long-term knowledge and skills retention, behavioral change, or patient outcomes are strongly recommended for future research.

Virtual Reality Training to Reduce Workplace Violence in Healthcare

Violence against nurses and other healthcare workers is a significant and escalating concern, impeding the provision of safe and effective healthcare services. A majority of nurses experience some kind of violence, including physical and nonphysical assaults during their careers. The consequences of workplace violence extend beyond individual trauma, leading to increased burnout, turnover, and significant financial costs for healthcare systems. Training programs focused on workplace violence prevention (WVP) have become ubiquitous, with elements like situational threat assessment, de-escalation techniques, and physical skills. Studies show that experiential components, such as role play, enhance the effectiveness of these trainings. Virtual Reality (VR) offers a promising solution by providing immersive, interactive training environments that enhance decision-making, physical coordination, and team dynamics. In this article we discuss how VR simulations can replicate real-world settings, allowing healthcare workers to practice and master violence prevention and management skills in a controlled, safe environment. We also describe how VR is scalable and cost-effective, enabling widespread adoption within and across organizations with minimal logistical challenges. Integrating VR into WVP training programs could significantly improve training outcomes, reduce the need for physical and chemical restraints, and ultimately enhance the overall safety and quality of healthcare services.

In situ simulation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A systematic review

Objectives

To evaluate the effectiveness of in situ simulation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training on clinical and educational outcomes.

Methods

Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and non-randomised studies evaluating in situ simulation for cardiopulmonary resuscitation CPR training of healthcare workers in any setting compared to traditional training and reporting data on patients' survival, patients' outcomes, clinical performance and teamwork in actual or simulated resuscitation and resources needed were included. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were searches from inception to October 28th 2024 (PROSPERO CRD42024521780). The assessment of risk of bias was done using RoB2 or ROBINS-I and the certainty of evidence was assessed by the GRADE approach. Meta-analysis was not possible due to significant heterogeneity in setting, interventions, control, and outcome definitions. The evidence was summarised according to the Synthesis Without Meta-Analysis (SwiM) reporting guidelines. No funding has been obtained.

Results

From 1062 records, 10 articles were included after full-text review (4 RCTs, 6 non-randomised). The risk of bias was judged as high or some concerns for RCTs and critical or serious for non-randomised studies. The certainty of evidence was very low for all the evaluated outcomes mainly due to risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. Two non-randomised studies reported data on patient survival, while two other non-randomized studies provided data on the review outcome of 'patient outcomes', suggesting a potential benefit of in situ simulation or no difference. Four non-randomised studies reported improving or no difference in clinical performance in actual resuscitation. One study reported improved teamwork in actual resuscitation while another reported no difference. Most included studies reported improved clinical performance, teamwork and CPR skill in simulated resuscitation after in situ simulation training vs. traditional training. No study evaluated the resources needed.

Conclusion

The heterogenous evidence suggests that in situ simulation should be considered as an option for CPR training. The certainty of evidence is very low and cost-benefit balance is uncertain due to lack of data about resource needed.

Knowledge of the nursing team about cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation: mixed methods studies

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the knowledge and perceptions of the nursing team about arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults before and after in situ simulation in emergency care.

METHOD

A sequential explanatory mixed methods study conducted in an Emergency Care Unit. Quantitative data were obtained through pre- and post-simulation questionnaire answered by 21 professionals and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The qualitative data was obtained through individual structured interviews with 19 professionals, analyzed according to thematic content analysis. The data was combined through connection.

RESULTS

In situ simulation did not significantly change pre- and post-simulation knowledge. Hand positioning for cardiac compressions and handling the automatic external defibrillator had the lowest number of correct answers. The qualitative data indicated difficulties related to knowledge, such as lack of training and insufficient experience with cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences were identified in the proportions of answers obtained through the pre- and post-simulation in situ questionnaire regarding correct answers and wrong answers. Furthermore, the qualitative data reinforced the professionals' lack of experience in critical situations, the lack of training and ongoing studies on the subject.

Quantification of training in educational methodology among teachers on the degree course in medicine: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Medical education has undergone significant changes over the last decades. Scientific and technological progress alongside contemporary society's changing requirements have driven demand for highly trained, competent doctors. In response to this need, university faculties of medicine have sought innovative forms of teaching and evaluating the students on their degree courses. The aim of this study was to quantify the characteristics and extent of academic training in teaching methods, of participation in innovative teaching initiatives, and training in simulation and debriefing among the teaching personnel on the degree course in medicine at the University of Granada (Spain).

METHODS

This transversal descriptive study was conducted among a population of 121 educators teaching on the medical degree course at the University of Granada, Spain. All responded to a specially designed CoRe-Content Representation questionnaire. This consisted of various parts: (a) demographic data; (b) teaching experience and qualifications; (c) specific information about training in teaching skills received. The Fisher test was applied whenever the dependent variable had two values (dichotomous) and the Chi-square test when it had more than two values (polytomic). Statistical significance was established with an alpha error of 5%.

RESULTS

The results showed that 87.60% of the educators had received no training in debriefing. There was a notable gender gap, whereby women held fewer management posts, fewer were engaged in clinical activity, and fewer had undergone training in clinical simulation. Teachers with degrees in medicine had undergone less regulated training than educators with other degree qualifications.

CONCLUSION

The main areas of medical training that require improvement (and so present challenges to be met in the years to come) are as follows: a definitive solution to the existing gender gap, general implementation of new educational models and methods (especially learning based on clinical problem-solving and simulation), closing generation gaps, and improved training processes for educators with clinical attachment.

Interprofessional In Situ Simulation's Impact on Healthcare Personnel's Competence and Reported Need for Training in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation-A Pilot Study in Norway

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

International guidelines recommend cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] training every sixth month. However, research indicates that more training is needed to maintain CPR competence. The objectives of this pilot study were (a) to assess health personnel's self-reported competence and need for more training in CPR before and after interprofessional in situ CPR simulation and (b) to assess time since the last CPR course and respondent's reported need for more training. Also, we wanted a pilot to assess areas of improvement in a future, larger study.

METHODS

A questionnaire was administered to healthcare personnel in hospital wards receiving CPR training using a purposeful sampling strategy.

RESULTS

In total, 311 respondents answered the pre-intervention and 45 respondents answered the post-intervention survey. The respondents believed they had good knowledge, skills, and training in CPR, and about 2/3 of the respondents reported a need for more knowledge, skills, and training. There was a weak positive correlation between the time since the last CPR course and the perceived need for more training [p < 0.05]. There were no significant differences in self-reported competence or perceived need for more training pre- and post-intervention. The pilot detected several limitations that need improvement in a future study.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors suggest that regular training is important for maintaining competence in CPR. Also, in a future study, comparisons at an individual level, as well as assessments by experts and of non-technical skills, should be included.

Implementation of Routine In Situ Simulation in Residency Curriculum Targeting Competency in Technical and Decision-Making Skills

OBJECTIVE

To describe the development and implementation of a comprehensive in situ simulation-based curriculum for anesthesia residents.

DESIGN

This is a prospective study.

SETTING

This study was conducted at a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

This single-center prospective study included all 53 anesthesia residents enrolled in the anesthesia residency program.

INTERVENTIONS

Introduction of a routine, high-fidelity, in situ simulation program that incorporates short sessions to train residents in the necessary skill sets and decision-making processes required in the operating room.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Our team conducted 182 individual 15-minute simulation sessions over 3 months during regular working hours. All 53 residents in our program actively participated in the simulations. Most residents engaged in at least 3 sessions, with an average participation rate of 3.4 per resident (range, 1-6 sessions). Residents completed an online anonymous survey, with a response rate of 71.7% (38 of 53 residents) over the 3-month period. The survey aimed to assess their overall impression and perceived contribution of this project to their training.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed teaching method can bridge the gap in resident training and enhance their critical reasoning to manage diverse clinical situations they may not experience during their residency.

Implementing Simple and Effective Simulation Experiences

Implementing simple and effective nursing simulation experiences at the bedside or in a simulation center in a hospital setting can be an impactful way to enhance skill development, encourage critical thinking, and improve patient safety. However, there are often challenges and barriers to the bedside nurses participating in simulation in the hospital setting. Applying the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice will give the bedside nurse and educator consistency in implementing and planning effective simulations.

Using Video-Reflexive Methods to Develop a Provider Down Protocol for the New South Wales Biocontainment Center

The New South Wales Biocontainment Centre is a statewide referral facility for patients with high-consequence infectious disease (HCID). The facility collaborates with researchers to adapt existing HCID procedures such as donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE). However, information on how to respond safely to collapse of a healthcare provider in full PPE within a contaminated zone is scarce. To address this gap, we adapted Nebraska Medicine's "provider down" protocol on paper and then simulated and video recorded the process, iteratively, in the facility. Clinicians analyzed the recordings collaboratively in researcher-facilitated reflexive discussions. Our primary aim was to ascertain how to maintain optimal infection prevention and control while providing urgent care for the healthcare provider. We tested participants' suggested modifications, in repeated video recorded simulations, until consensus on optimal practice was achieved. Our secondary aim was to assess the utility of video-reflexive methods to enhance clinicians' awareness and understanding of infection prevention and control in a rare and complex scenario. Six adaptations and simulations were discussed in video-reflexive sessions before consensus was reached; the final version of the protocol differed considerably from the first. Viewing footage of simulations in situ enabled participants to (1) identify infection and occupational risks not identified on paper or during verbal postsimulation debriefs and (2) test alternative perspectives on safe procedure. Video-reflexivity enables context-sensitive and consensus-building codesign of policies and procedures, critical to protocol development in a new unit. It contributes to a culture of teamwork, preparedness, and confidence before, rather than in the heat of, a crisis.

Using In Situ Simulation to Identify Latent Safety Threats in Emergency Medicine: A Systematic Review

SUMMARY STATEMENT

This review aimed to explore existing literature on the use of in situ simulation to identify latent safety threats in emergency medicine. Studies were required to take place in a clinically active emergency department and have either a primary or secondary aim of identifying latent safety threats. A total of 2921 articles were retrieved through database searches and a total of 15 were deemed to meet the inclusion criteria.Latent safety threats were detected by a variety of methods including documentation during debrief/discussion (66%), during the simulation itself (33%), participant surveys (20%), and video analysis (20%). Using a multimodality approach with input from observers and participants from different professional backgrounds yielded the highest number of threats per simulation case (43 per case). Equipment was the most commonly reported threat (83%), followed by teamwork/communication (67%). Some studies did not report on mitigation of identified risks; formal processes should be implemented for the management of latent safety threats identified by in situ simulation. Future research should focus on translational outcomes to further strengthen the position of in situ simulation in emergency medicine.

Ward-based in situ simulation: lessons learnt from a UK District General Hospital

INTRODUCTION

In situ simulation (ISS) enables multiprofessional healthcare teams to train for real emergencies in their own working environment and identify latent patient safety threats. This study aimed to determine ISS impact on teamwork, technical skill performance, healthcare staff perception and latent error identification during simulated medical emergencies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Unannounced ISS sessions (n=14, n=75 staff members) using a high-fidelity mannequin were conducted in medical, paediatric and rehabilitation wards at Stepping Hill Hospital (Stockport National Health Service Foundation Trust, UK). Each session encompassed a 15 min simulation followed by a 15 min faculty-led debrief.

RESULTS

The clinical team score revealed low overall teamwork performances during simulated medical emergencies (mean±SEM: 4.3±0.5). Linear regression analysis revealed that overall communication (r=0.9, p<0.001), decision-making (r=0.77, p<0.001) and overall situational awareness (r=0.73, p=0.003) were the strongest statistically significant predictors of overall teamwork performance. Neither the number of attending healthcare professionals, their professional background, age, gender, degree of clinical experience, level of resuscitation training or previous simulation experience statistically significantly impacted on overall teamwork performance. ISS positively impacted on healthcare staff confidence and clinical training. Identified safety threats included unknown location of intraosseous kits, poor/absent airway management, incomplete A-E assessments, inability to activate the major haemorrhage protocol, unknown location/dose of epinephrine for anaphylaxis management, delayed administration of epinephrine and delayed/absence of attachment of pads to the defibrillator as well as absence of accessing ALS algorithms, poor chest compressions and passive behaviour during simulated cardiac arrests.

CONCLUSION

Poor demonstration of technical/non-technical skills mandate regular ISS interventions for healthcare professionals of all levels. ISS positively impacts on staff confidence and training and drives identification of latent errors enabling improvements in workplace systems and resources.

Translational simulation revisited: an evolving conceptual model for the contribution of simulation to healthcare quality and safety

The simulation community has effectively responded to calls for a more direct contribution by simulation to healthcare quality and safety, and clearer alignment with health service priorities, but the conceptual framing of this contribution has been vague. The term 'translational simulation' was proposed in 2017 as a "functional term for how simulation may be connected directly with health service priorities and patient outcomes, through interventional and diagnostic functions" (Brazil V. Adv Simul. 2:20, 2017). Six years later, this conceptual framing is clearer. Translational simulation has been applied in diverse contexts, affording insights into its strengths and limitations. Three core concepts are identifiable in recently published translational simulation studies: a clear identification of simulation purpose, an articulation of the simulation process, and an engagement with the conceptual foundations of translational simulation practice. In this article, we reflect on current translational simulation practice and scholarship, especially with respect to these three core concepts, and offer a further elaborated conceptual model based on its use to date.

Mapping the Landscape: Simulation Centers in Portugal

INTRODUCTION

Simulation-based training has emerged as a vital component of healthcare education. This study aims to characterize Portuguese simulation centers concerning their geographic distribution and key features, providing stakeholders with valuable insights to inform strategic decisions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted over two years (2021-2023) to investigate the geographical dispersion and characteristics of simulation centers in Portugal. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were used to analyze data.

RESULTS

Twenty-three Portuguese simulation centers were included. Major urban areas and coastal regions bring together 20 simulation centers (86.96%). A large percentage (71.93%) of centers were affiliated with academic institutions, while five centers (21.74%) were clinically affiliated. Emergency care, Anesthesiology and Intensive Medicine, Pediatrics, and Gynecology and Obstetrics were identified as the national key areas of intervention.

DISCUSSION

Significant geographical disparity raises concerns about unequal access to professional training opportunities using simulation. Centers should be encouraged to incorporate developing technologies and innovative pedagogical methodologies and to expand their training repertoire into relatively uncharted territories.

CONCLUSION

Several issues have been identified within the national simulation network. Stakeholders and policymakers should prioritize equitable access, bolster the prevalence of clinical affiliated centers, foster innovation, and facilitate strategic coordination.

Exploring the safety and quality of mobile X-ray imaging in a new infectious disease biocontainment unit: an in situ simulation and video-reflexive study

OBJECTIVES

During a precommissioning inspection of a new biocontainment centre, radiographers noted structural features of quarantine rooms that could compromise staff and patient safety and the X-ray image quality, even after significant modifications had been made to an earlier radiography protocol. The aim of this study was to explore the safety and effectiveness of the modified protocol, in the new space, and identify improvements, if required.

DESIGN

A qualitative study using in situ simulation and video-reflexive methods.

SETTING

A newly built biocontainment centre, prior to its commissioning in 2021, in a large, tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Five radiographers, and a nurse and a physician from the biocontainment centre, consented to participate. All completed the study.

INTERVENTIONS

Two simulated mobile X-ray examinations were conducted in the unit prior to its commissioning; simulations were videoed. Participants and other stakeholders analysed video footage, collaboratively, and sessions were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Problems and potential solutions identified were collated and communicated to the hospital executive, for endorsement and actioning, if possible.

RESULTS

Four themes were identified from the data: infection exposure risks, occupational health and exposure risks, communication and X-ray image quality. Facilitated group reviews of video footage identified several important issues, across these four areas of risk, which had not been identified previously.

CONCLUSIONS

In situ simulation is used, increasingly, to evaluate and improve healthcare practices. This study confirmed the added value of video-reflexive methods, which provided experienced participants with a richer view of a familiar protocol, in a new setting. Video footage can be examined immediately, or later if required, by a broader group of stakeholders, with diverse experience or expertise. Using video reflexivity, clinicians identified potential safety risks, which were collated and reported to the hospital executive, who agreed to implement modifications.

In situ simulation training strengthened bachelor of nursing students' experienced learning and development process- a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

In advanced clinical learning labs on campus, high-fidelity simulation has become an essential educational approach in the Bachelor of Nursing Education programme. However, simulation while in clinical placement, in situ, is rarely used in Bachelor of Nursing Education. The aim of the present study was to explore how in situ simulation training at a surgical hospital ward, according to Bachelor of Nursing students, influenced their learning and development process.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive study was conducted. Data were collected through individual interviews with a sample of 21 s-year Bachelor of Nursing students who completed 40 in situ simulations during their eight-week clinical placement at a Norwegian University Hospital. Data were analysed using inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

The data analysis generated six subcategories constituting two descriptive categories: building professional confidence and internalising nursing knowledge. Although the students found in situ simulation stressful and uncomfortable for being assessed by student peers, the teacher and preceptor, the process of managing clinical situations in simulation helped build professional confidence. What the students had learned in the simulation was directly transferable to real clinical situations because they were in the hospital setting. The simulation sessions enabled them to connect theoretical knowledge and clinical skills. They could test their skills in a safe environment, performing procedures that made them aware of how their knowledge could be used in real life.

CONCLUSION

According to the Bachelor of Nursing students' own experiences, in situ simulation supported the students' learning process, connected theory and practice and contributed to developing confidence in the performance of clinical skills. Including simulation in clinical practice could prove to be an effective way of teaching and learning clinical skills in nursing regarding resources and learning outcomes.

Should the existing science of teams be applied to fluid teams? An exploration of fluid team effectiveness within the context of healthcare simulation

Introduction

Fluid teams have become increasingly prevalent and necessary for modern-day issues, yet they differ from more traditional teams, on which much of the current teams literature is based. For example, fluid teams are often comprised of members from different disciplines or organizational divisions who do not have a shared history or future, as they come together to perform a critical, time-sensitive task, and then disband. For these reasons, the mechanisms through which they function and perform may differ from those of more traditional teams, and research is needed to better understand these differences.

Methods

To this end, this study utilized critical incident techniques and thematic analysis to examine fluid teams within healthcare, one of the primary contexts in which they are prevalent. Interdisciplinary faculty and students in the medical field who encounter fluid teams within simulation-based education were prompted to reflect on key factors that facilitate or hinder fluid team effectiveness.

Results

Primary themes extracted pertained to the conditions fluid teams operate within (e.g., high-stress), the behaviors and emergent states that contribute to their success (e.g., communication), and the KSAO's of value for members of fluid teams to possess (e.g., readiness). These themes were then compared to existing literature, yielding the identification of some similarities but also many important differences between fluid and traditional teams.

Discussion

A series of practical recommendations for how to promote fluid team effectiveness is then presented.

Simulation training for medical emergencies of dental patients: A review of the dental literature

In recent years, due to the aging of the population, the number of dental patients with comorbidities such as hypertension and diabetes has increased. Although it has been reported that these patients are increasingly developing medical emergencies during their dental treatments, many dental providers still do not possess the skills to manage medical emergencies appropriately. Simulation training is essential to improve this situation however, there is no report describing how to conduct an effective simulation in detail for dental office medical emergencies. The purpose of this review is to provide information on simulations that is effective and practical. The authors will highlight the key characteristics for providing effective simulation trainings, such as the selection of simulators, simulation locations, instructors, debriefings, methods for evaluating educational effectiveness, and the use of telesimulation as a method for simulation training due to the global COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, this review provides recommendations on tailoring an ideal simulation training course for those who wish to create one. The authors hope that this review will promote the spread of effective simulation training and in turn, contribute to improving the medical safety of dental patients.

Sepsis and Clinical Simulation: What Is New? (and Old)

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a critical and potentially fatal condition affecting millions worldwide, necessitating early intervention for improved patient outcomes. In recent years, clinical simulation has emerged as a valuable tool for healthcare professionals to learn sepsis management skills and enhance them.

METHODS

This review aims to explore the use of clinical simulation in sepsis education and training, as well as its impact on how healthcare professionals acquire knowledge and skills. We conducted a thorough literature review to identify relevant studies, analyzing them to assess the effectiveness of simulation-based training, types of simulation methods employed, and their influence on patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Simulation-based training has proven effective in enhancing sepsis knowledge, skills, and confidence. Simulation modalities vary from low-fidelity exercises to high-fidelity patient simulations, conducted in diverse settings, including simulation centers, hospitals, and field environments. Importantly, simulation-based training has shown to improve patient outcomes, reducing mortality rates and hospital stays.

CONCLUSION

In summary, clinical simulation is a powerful tool used for improving sepsis education and training, significantly impacting patient outcomes. This article emphasizes the importance of ongoing research in this field to further enhance patient care. The shift toward simulation-based training in healthcare provides a safe, controlled environment for professionals to acquire critical skills, fostering confidence and proficiency when caring for real sepsis patients.

TeamSTEPPS®-based clinical simulation training program for critical care professionals: A mixed-methodology study

INTRODUCTION

The Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS®) programme has been shown to improve interprofessional work among healthcare professionals by enhancing teamwork. Intensive care professionals were trained in this methodology through the course "Simulation Trainer: Improving Teamwork through TeamSTEPPS®".

OBJECTIVES

To analyse the teamwork performance and good practice in simulation of the intensive care professionals attending the course and to explore their perceptions of the training experience carried out during the course.

METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive and phenomenological study was carried out using a mixed methodology. The 18 course participants were administered the questionnaires "TeamSTEPPS™ 2.0 Team Performance Observation Tool" to evaluate teamwork performance and "Educational Practices Questionnaire" for good practices in simulation after the simulated scenarios. Subsequently, a group interview was conducted through a focus group with 8 attendees using the Zoom™ videoconferencing platform. A thematic and content analysis of the discourses was carried out using the interpretative paradigm. Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics™ 27.0 and MAXQDA Analytics Pro™ respectively.

RESULTS

Both the level of teamwork performance (mean = 96.25; SD = 8.257) and good practice in simulation (mean = 75; SD = 1.632) following the simulated scenarios were adequate. The following main themes were identified: satisfaction with the TeamSTEPPS® methodology, usefulness of the methodology, barriers to methodology implementation and non-technical skills improved through TeamSTEPPS®.

CONCLUSIONS

TeamSTEPPS® methodology can be a good interprofessional education strategy for the improvement of communication and teamwork in intensive care professionals, both at the care level (through on-site simulation strategies) and at the teaching level (through its inclusion in the students' curriculum).

Clinical simulation in health education: a systematic review

Objective

To summarize the most recent scientific evidence on the usefulness and implementation of simulation training programs for health science students.

Methods

A search and systematic review were conducted of the literature through the use of the PRISMA guidelines using the terms MESH Simulation AND healthcare AND Professional Training, including 42 articles.

Results

The bibliometric analysis revealed that most of the studies were local in nature, that is, conducted in a single center, or in a few centers in the same region, from the English-speaking world, and using a mixed methodology with pre/post-test measurements. As for the educational aspects, most of the studies were conducted at universities or in the area of continuous education, used multidisciplinary teams as the student target, and used role-playing games as the simulation method. Also, these programs were especially successful in the acquisition of competencies, such as teamwork, communication, and trust.

Conclusion

Clinical simulation is a teaching methodology implemented in the last twenty years, mainly in English-speaking countries; it utilizes techniques for its execution and assessment that have been validated in contrasted in many scientific studies, and lastly, it was also observed that it is useful for providing training on general competencies for multidisciplinary groups.

Perceptions About Augmented Reality in Remote Medical Care: Interview Study of Emergency Telemedicine Providers

BACKGROUND

Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) have increasingly appeared in the medical literature in the past decade, with AR recently being studied for its potential role in remote health care delivery and communication. Recent literature describes AR's implementation in real-time telemedicine contexts across multiple specialties and settings, with remote emergency services in particular using AR to enhance disaster support and simulation education. Despite the introduction of AR in the medical literature and its potential to shape the future of remote medical services, studies have yet to investigate the perspectives of telemedicine providers regarding this novel technology.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to understand the applications and challenges of AR in telemedicine anticipated by emergency medicine providers with a range of experiences in using telemedicine and AR or VR technology.

METHODS

Across 10 academic medical institutions, 21 emergency medicine providers with variable exposures to telemedicine and AR or VR technology were recruited for semistructured interviews via snowball sampling. The interview questions focused on various potential uses of AR, anticipated obstacles that prevent its implementation in the telemedicine area, and how providers and patients might respond to its introduction. We included video demonstrations of a prototype using AR during the interviews to elicit more informed and complete insights regarding AR's potential in remote health care. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed via thematic coding.

RESULTS

Our study identified 2 major areas of use for AR in telemedicine. First, AR is perceived to facilitate information gathering by enhancing observational tasks such as visual examination and granting simultaneous access to data and remote experts. Second, AR is anticipated to supplement distance learning of both minor and major procedures and nonprocedural skills such as cue recognition and empathy for patients and trainees. AR may also supplement long-distance education programs and thereby support less specialized medical facilities. However, the addition of AR may exacerbate the preexisting financial, structural, and literacy barriers to telemedicine. Providers seek value demonstrated by extensive research on the clinical outcome, satisfaction, and financial benefits of AR. They also seek institutional support and early training before adopting novel tools such as AR. Although an overall mixed reception is anticipated, consumer adoption and awareness are key components in AR's adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

AR has the potential to enhance the ability to gather observational and medical information, which would serve a diverse set of applications in remote health care delivery and education. However, AR faces obstacles similar to those faced by the current telemedicine technology, such as lack of access, infrastructure, and familiarity. This paper discusses the potential areas of investigation that would inform future studies and approaches to implementing AR in telemedicine.

Multidisciplinary Simulation of Trauma in Pregnancy with Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta (REBOA) Utilization

Background Studies have demonstrated the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion catheters of the aorta (REBOA) in the setting of postpartum hemorrhage and traumatic hemorrhagic shock. However, REBOA is infrequently utilized leading to a lack of clinician comfort. This study's aim was to demonstrate the utility of REBOA in a hemorrhaging pregnant trauma patient and improve clinician comfort with the placement of REBOA while emphasizing collaboration between medical specialties. Methods A multidisciplinary in-situ simulation was developed for the management of a pregnant patient with an abdominal gunshot wound evaluated by obstetrics and surgery teams. A trauma survey, emergency c-section, massive transfusion protocol (MTP), and evaluation for and placement of REBOA were indicated during the simulation. A standardized Return on Learning questionnaire was utilized to determine participants' reactions and confidence gained during the simulation. Results A total of 32 of 41 participants completed the survey (78%). A statistically significant increase in confidence was reported in the ability to prioritize the care of a pregnant patient with hemorrhagic shock (p = 0.016), apply MTP to the appropriate clinical setting (p = 0.03), and analyze critical decisions made for abdominal trauma in pregnant patients (p = 0.006). Specifically for physicians, a significant increase in confidence in the ability to identify indications/contraindications for REBOA placement in hemorrhaging patients was observed (p = 0.021). Conclusions A multidisciplinary simulation for the management of a pregnant patient in hemorrhagic shock secondary to penetrating abdominal trauma improved learner confidence in MTP, care of pregnant patients in hemorrhagic shock, and abdominal trauma in pregnancy. Physician learners gained confidence in indications for REBOA placement in abdominal trauma. This simulation was highly relevant to all participants.

Impact of Non-Face-to-Face Teaching with Passive Training on Personal Protective Equipment Use in Health Science Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In the COVID-19 era, there was a call for the transformation of higher education. Universities had to combine non-face-to-face teaching with traditional procedures. This study analyzed the effectiveness and perceived satisfaction in a cohort of health sciences students of non-face-to-face teaching with passive training versus face-to-face teaching with active training in the proper donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE) in a clinical simulation scenario.

METHODS

A total of 142 participants were randomized into two groups: (a) non-face-to-face teaching with passive training; (b) face-to-face teaching with active training. The proper protocol for donning and doffing PPE was assessed. Students evaluated their skills before and after training and satisfaction with training received.

RESULTS

Significant differences were observed for the statements "I felt more confident in donning after receiving this training" (p = 0.029) and "I felt more confident in doffing after receiving this training" (p = 0.042) in the face-to-face teaching with active training group compared to the non-face-to-face teaching with passive training group, whose number of tasks violated was significantly higher (p = 0.020). Satisfaction was significantly higher in the face-to-face and active training group (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Face-to-face teaching with active training improves effectiveness and satisfaction more than non-face-to-face teaching with passive training for acquiring skills in donning and doffing PPE properly.

The utility of a gross dissection anatomical model for simulation-based learning in pathology

INTRODUCTION

The examination of morphological alterations in tissues is fundamental in Pathology. Traditional training in gross dissection has several limitations, including the risk of transmissible diseases, formaldehyde exposure and limited specimen availability. We describe a teaching method using anatomical simulators.

METHODS

Liquid silicone-based artisan neoplastic anatomical models were used in conjunction with clinical scenarios. Eighty-five medical students participated in a gross dissection experience and were asked to complete a feedback questionnaire. Additionally, a workshop was organized for students to compare three different teaching methods. The first one used still images (Group1-G1), the second a video explanation (Group2-G2), and the third directly observed a pathologist while grossing (Group3-G3).

RESULTS

The knowledge acquisition questionnaire showed an average value of 4.4 out of 5 (1-5) (range 3.4-4.7, σ0.89). The categories 'knowledge of resection margins' and 'macroscopic diagnosis' received the highest values (4.8, σ0.11 and 4.7, σ0.32, respectively), followed by 'understanding of handling and gross examination of the surgical specimen' (4.5, σ0.49), 'prognosis' (4.3, σ0.67) and 'understanding of a tumor resection' (3.9, σ0.96) (p<0.05). Regarding teaching methods, G3 spent less time than G2 and G1 with mean times of 15'39″ (σ2'12″), 16'50″ (σ3'45″), and 17'52″ (σ2'12″), respectively (p<0.05). Gross dissection marks (0-5) showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05). G2 obtained better results (3.7;σ0.54) than G3 (3.4;σ0.94) or G1 (3.1;σ0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study demonstrates that it is possible to implement a gross dissection simulation module at medical school and thus enable the acquisition of skills in a secure environment.

Trends and Innovations of Simulation for Twenty First Century Medical Education

In the last two decades there has been an enormous growth in the use of clinical simulation. This teaching-learning methodology is currently the main tool used in the training of healthcare professionals. Clinical simulation is in tune with new paradigms in education and is consistent with educational theories that support the use of experiential learning. It promotes the development of psychomotor skills and strengthens executive functions. This pedagogical approach can be applied in many healthcare topics and is particularly relevant in the context of restricted access to clinical settings. This is particularly relevant considering the current crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, or when trying to reduce the frequency of accidents attributed to errors in clinical practice. This mini-review provides an overview of the current literature on healthcare simulation methods, as well as prospects for education and public health benefits. A literature search was conducted in order to find the most current trends and state of the art in medical education simulation. Presently, there are many areas of application for this methodology and new areas are constantly being explored. It is concluded that medical education simulation has a solid theoretical basis and wide application in the training of health professionals at present. In addition, it is consolidated as an unavoidable methodology both in undergraduate curricula and in continuing medical education. A promising scenario for medical education simulation is envisaged in the future, hand in hand with the development of technological advances.

Emergency Medicine Cases in Underwater and Hyperbaric Environments: The Use of in situ Simulation as a Learning Technique

INTRODUCTION

Hyperbaric chambers and underwater environments are challenging and at risk of serious accidents. Personnel aiming to assist patients and subjects should be appropriately trained, and several courses have been established all over the world. In healthcare, simulation is an effective learning technique. However, there have been few peer-reviewed articles published in the medical literature describing its use in diving and hyperbaric medicine.

METHODS

We implemented the curriculum of the Master's degree in hyperbaric and diving medicine held at the University of Padova with emergency medicine seminars created by the faculty and validated by external experts. These seminars integrated traditional lectures and eight in situ simulation scenarios.

RESULTS

For the hyperbaric medicine seminar, simulations were carried out inside a real hyperbaric chamber at the ATIP Hyperbaric Treatment Centre, only using air and reproducing compression noise without pressurization to avoid damages to the manikins. The four scenarios consisted of hyperoxic seizures, pneumothorax, hypoglycemia, and sudden cardiac arrest. Furthermore, we added a hands-on session to instruct participants to prepare an intubated patient undergoing hyperbaric oxygen treatment with a checklist and simulating the patient transfer inside and outside the hyperbaric chamber. The diving medicine seminar was held at the Y-40 The Deep Joy pool in Montegrotto Terme (Italy), also involving SCUBA/breath-hold diving (BHD) instructors to rescue subjects from the water. These diving medicine scenarios consisted of neurologic syndrome ("taravana/samba") in BHD, drowning of a breath-hold diver, pulmonary barotrauma in BHD, and decompression illness in a SCUBA diver.

CONCLUSION

With this experience, we report the integration of simulation in the curriculum of a teaching course in diving and hyperbaric medicine. Future studies should be performed to investigate learning advantages, concept retention, and satisfaction of participants.

Assessment of a multiprofessional training programme by in situ simulation in the maternity units of the Pays de Loire regional perinatal network

INTRODUCTION

Initially dispensed in specialized simulation centers, simulation training has recently begun to take place directly in healthcare facilities, that is, in situ. The objective of this study is to assess the effect of training by in situ simulation in obstetrics.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The training program, dispensed over a 2-day period, took place in maternity units of the members of the Pays de la Loire perinatal network, Réseau Sécurité Naissance (Network Safety Birth). All participants received a learner satisfaction questionnaire to complete (5-point Likert-like scales). Then, at least 6 months later, each maternity ward received a general questionnaire to assess the effect of the training, as well as a second questionnaire specific to each institution, about the areas for improvement proposed by the teaching team after debriefings.

RESULTS

The 14 establishments included in our study returned 375 satisfaction questionnaires. In all, 91.1 % were very satisfied and reported that the training met their expectations, and 99.7 % thought the program would have an impact on their professional practice. More than 94 % of the learners wanted more simulation sessions. Among the 14 facilities, 9 (64.3 %) returned their evaluation questionnaires. In 44.4 % of cases, they reported improvement in team cohesion and in team communication, while the others reported these elements remained stable. All maternity units reported that the training had a positive impact on their team, and that they would be interested in new training program with in situ simulation.

DISCUSSION

Most participants clearly appreciated this training. In situ simulation training also led to the identification of areas for improvements, many of them accomplished, through the drafting of protocols or material modifications aimed at improving staff practices and therefore global patient care. There are many ways by which these training programs can be made sustainable, including the development of a new training program of in situ simulation or the creation of onsite simulation sessions on demand or by the professionals at each institution.

CONCLUSION

This survey demonstrated the enthusiasm of healthcare professionals about in situ simulation. Moreover, overall improvement in team communication and cohesion was reported in the medium term (evaluation at more than 6 months). The interest of continuing these training sessions appears undeniable.