Is dermoscopy a good tool for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna and lentigo maligna melanoma? A meta-analysis

Characteristics of patients with melanoma with non‑melanoma skin cancer comorbidity: Practical implications based on a retrospective study

The co-occurrence of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) can lead to increased morbidity. However, there has been limited research into the dermoscopic characteristics of melanomas and clinical factors during co-occurrence. A total of 264 patients with melanoma, including 63 with NMSC comorbidity, were enrolled in the present study to retrospectively analyse the coexistence of melanoma morphology, as determined by dermoscopic examination, pathological report, tumour location and clinically manifested risk factors. The frequency of solar lentiginosis (SL) was compared between 264 patients with melanoma and 233 patients with NMSC without melanoma. In 83.4% of cases, skin cancer occurred before or concomitantly with the melanoma. The leading indicators of comorbidity were age (median 70 years; P<0.0001) and SL on the trunk and arms (P<0.0001). Melanomas in patients with NMSC comorbidity were significantly more frequently located on the head and neck [P<0.001; Bonferroni adjusted P-value (P-adj.)<0.01], then on the trunk, but less frequently occurred on the lower limbs (P<0.05). The dermoscopic multicomponent asymmetric pattern was the predominant pattern in both groups. The most characteristic pattern in the NMSC group was facial melanoma (P<0.005; P-adj.<0.05); the spitzoid pattern (P<0.001; P-adj.<0.01) was rare. Dermoscopic regression was more common (P<0.001) in the NMSC group. Regression and the number of nevi were independent of age. Differences in the incidence of SL were evaluated based on the presence of melanoma (P<0.01) and in patients without melanoma based on the presence of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; P<0.01), multiple basal cell carcinoma (P<0.0001) and multiple SCC (P<0.005). Patients with melanoma were 10 years younger on average compared with patients with NMSC (P<0.0001). The differentiation factors identified in the present study may improve the precision of dermoscopic examinations and potentially lead to modifications in the diagnostic workflow for patients with multiple NMSCs with comorbid melanoma.

Skin Cancer Diagnosis by Lesion, Physician, and Examination Type: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Skin cancer is the most common cancer in the US; accurate detection can minimize morbidity and mortality.

Objective

To assess the accuracy of skin cancer diagnosis by lesion type, physician specialty and experience, and physical examination method.

Data Sources

PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science.

Study Selection

Cross-sectional and case-control studies, randomized clinical trials, and nonrandomized controlled trials that used dermatologists or primary care physicians (PCPs) to examine keratinocytic and/or melanocytic skin lesions were included.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Search terms, study objectives, and protocol methods were defined before study initiation. Data extraction was performed by a reviewer, with verification by a second reviewer. A mixed-effects model was used in the data analysis. Data analyses were performed from May 2022 to December 2023.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy comprised sensitivity and specificity by physician type (primary care physician or dermatologist; experienced or inexperienced) and examination method (in-person clinical examination and/or clinical images vs dermoscopy and/or dermoscopic images).

Results

In all, 100 studies were included in the analysis. With experienced dermatologists using clinical examination and clinical images, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing keratinocytic carcinomas were 79.0% and 89.1%, respectively; using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 83.7% and 87.4%, and for PCPs, 81.4% and 80.1%. Experienced dermatologists had 2.5-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of keratinocytic carcinomas using in-person dermoscopy and dermoscopic images compared with in-person clinical examination and images. When examining for melanoma using clinical examination and images, sensitivity and specificity were 76.9% and 89.1% for experienced dermatologists, 78.3% and 66.2% for inexperienced dermatologists, and 37.5% and 84.6% for PCPs, respectively; whereas when using dermoscopy and dermoscopic images, sensitivity and specificity were 85.7% and 81.3%, 78.0% and 69.5%, and 49.5% and 91.3%, respectively. Experienced dermatologists had 5.7-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy compared with clinical examination. Compared with PCPs, experienced dermatologists had 13.3-fold higher odds of accurate diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopic images.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that there are significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for skin cancer when comparing physician specialty and experience, and examination methods. These summary metrics of clinician diagnostic accuracy could be useful benchmarks for clinical trials, practitioner training, and the performance of emerging technologies.

Dermoscopy Training Course Improves Ophthalmologists' Accuracy in Diagnosing Atypical Pigmented Periorbital Skin Lesions

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Facial pigmented skin lesions are extremely common, starting from the fourth to fifth decades, especially in South-European countries, often located in the periorbital region. These include malignant forms, Lentigo maligna (LM) and lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), characterized by growing incidence, and a series of benign simulators, including solar lentigo (SL), pigmented actinic keratosis (PAK), seborrheic keratosis (SK) and lichen planus-like keratosis (LPK). The clinical differential diagnosis of atypical pigmented skin lesions (aPFLs) can be difficult, even for dermatologists, leading to inappropriate skin biopsies with consequent aesthetic impacts. Dermoscopy of the facial area is a specific dermoscopic field that requires dedicated training and proved to increase diagnostic accuracy in dermatologists. Since these lesions are often seen by ophthalmologists at first, we aimed to evaluate the effect of a focused dermoscopy training course on a group of ophthalmologists naïve to the use of a dermatoscope.

METHODS

A set of 80 periorbital pigmented skin lesions with both clinical and dermoscopic images was selected and evaluated by six ophthalmologists before and after a one-day intensive dermoscopic training course. They were required to evaluate 80 periorbital lesions one month before and after a one-day intensive dermoscopic training course, illustrating second-level diagnostic options such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), obtaining a total of 480 evaluations. Specifically, they had to provide, for each case, a punctual diagnosis and a management option among dermoscopic follow-up/skin biopsy/RCM/LC-OCT. Descriptive statistics were carried out, and the accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SE), and specificity (SP), with their 95% confidence interval (95% CI), were estimated.

RESULTS

In the pre-course test, ophthalmologists achieved 84.0% SP, 33.3% SE and 63.7% ACC, while after the course, SE increased by +9% (i.e., 41.7%), SP decreased by 4%, and ACC remained comparable, i.e., 64.6%. In the management study, the percentage of benign lesions for which a close dermoscopic follow-up was suggested significantly decreased (51.6% versus 22.2%), in parallel with an increase in the number of lesions referred for RCM. As for malignant cases, the reduction in responses "close dermoscopic follow-up" decreased from 37.0% to 9.9%, (-27%), in favor of RCM (+15%) and skin biopsy (+12%).

CONCLUSIONS

The ophthalmologists proved to be very receptive in quickly metabolizing and putting into practice the concepts learned during the one-day intensive dermoscopy training course. Indeed, after only a one-day lesson, they were able to increase their SE by 9% and to improve their management strategy. The present findings highlight the importance of providing training ophthalmologists in dermoscopy during residency programs, in terms of benefits for the correct patient care.

Cutaneous Melanoma: An Overview of Physiological and Therapeutic Aspects and Biotechnological Use of Serine Protease Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Metastatic melanoma stands out as the most lethal form of skin cancer because of its high propensity to spread and its remarkable resistance to treatment methods.

METHODS

In this review article, we address the incidence of melanoma worldwide and its staging phases. We thoroughly investigate the different melanomas and their associated risk factors. In addition, we underscore the principal therapeutic goals and pharmacological methods that are currently used in the treatment of melanoma.

RESULTS

The implementation of targeted therapies has contributed to improving the approach to patients. However, because of the emergence of resistance early in treatment, overall survival and progression-free periods continue to be limited.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide new insights into plant serine protease inhibitor therapeutics, supporting high-throughput drug screening soon, and seeking a complementary approach to explain crucial mechanisms associated with melanoma.

Perifollicular linear projections: A dermatoscopic criterion for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna on the face

BACKGROUND

Lentigo maligna (LM) can mimic benign, flat, pigmented lesions and can be challenging to diagnose.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a new dermatoscopic feature termed "perifollicular linear projections (PLP)" as a diagnostic criterion for LM on the face.

METHODS

Retrospective study on reflectance confocal microscopy and dermatoscopy images of flat facial pigmented lesions originating from 2 databases. PLP were defined as short, linear, pigmented projections emanating from hair follicles. Dermatoscopy readers were blinded to the final histopathologic diagnosis.

RESULTS

From 83 consecutive LMs, 21/83 (25.3%) displayed "bulging of hair follicles" on reflectance confocal microscopy and 18 of these 21 (85.7%), displayed PLP on dermatoscopy. From a database of 2873 consecutively imaged and biopsied lesions, 252 flat-pigmented facial lesions were included. PLP was seen in 47/76 melanomas (61.8%), compared with 7/176 lesions (3.9%) with other diagnosis (P < .001). The sensitivity was 61.8% (95% CI, 49.9%-72.7%), specificity 96.0% (95% CI, 92.9%-98.4%). PLP was independently associated with LM diagnosis on multivariate analysis (OR 26.1 [95% CI, 9.6%-71.0]).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study.

CONCLUSION

PLP is a newly described dermatoscopic criterion that may add specificity and sensitivity to the early diagnosis of LM located on the face. We postulate that PLP constitutes an intermediary step in the LM progression model.

Is reflectance confocal microscopy useful in the differential diagnosis of extra facial lentigo maligna? A retrospective multicentric case-control study

BACKGROUND

Extra facial lentigo maligna (EF-LM) arises outside the head and neck area. EF-LM presents the classic histological features of lentigo maligna. The dermoscopic aspects of EF-LM have been poorly studied.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aims of our study were to analyse and describe the clinical, dermoscopic and confocal microscopy features of a series of histologically confirmed EF-LM.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective and multicentric study. From our database, we selected 48 cases of thin melanomas on photodamaged skin with histological features of EF-LM of which clinical, dermoscopic and confocal microscopy images were available, and a control group of 45 lesions, that can be subjected to differential diagnosis such as solar lentigo, lichenoid keratosis, seborrheic keratosis and melanocytic nevi, of which dermoscopic and confocal microscope images were available.

RESULTS

Extra facial lentigo maligna had a higher prevalence of lentigo-like pigment patterns, angulated lines and zigzag structures. At confocal microscopy, LM-EF cases showed a higher prevalence of pagetoid spreading, round cells, dendritic cells in the epidermis, atypical cells at the dermo-epidermal junction, dendritic cells at the junction, meshwork pattern and elastosis. Our study shows that reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) has a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 97% for the differential diagnosis of this type of melanoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Extra facial lentigo maligna does not have the classic dermoscopic features of superficial spreading melanoma, the most observed dermoscopic criteria are angulated lines and lentigo-like pigment patterns without lentigo-like border. RCM can be a valuable imaging tool for the evaluation of all those suspicion skin lesions at dermoscopy highlighting cellular atypia suggestive for melanoma.

A risk-scoring model for the differential diagnosis of lentigo maligna and other atypical pigmented facial lesions of the face: The facial iDScore

BACKGROUND

Due to progressive ageing of the population, the incidence of facial lentigo maligna (LM) of the face is increasing. Many benign simulators of LM and LMM, known as atypical pigmented facial lesions (aPFLs-pigmented actinic keratosis, solar lentigo, seborrheic keratosis, seborrheic-lichenoid keratosis, atypical nevus) may be found on photodamaged skin. This generates many diagnostic issues and increases the number of biopsies, with a subsequent impact on aesthetic outcome and health insurance costs.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was to develop a risk-scoring classifier-based algorithm to estimate the probability of an aPFL being malignant. A second aim was to compare its diagnostic accuracy with that of dermoscopists so as to define the advantages of using the model in patient management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 154 dermatologists analysed 1111 aPFLs and their management in a teledermatology setting: They performed pattern analysis, gave an intuitive clinical diagnosis and proposed lesion management options (follow-up/reflectance confocal microscopy/biopsy). Each case was composed of a dermoscopic and/or clinical picture plus metadata (histology, age, sex, location, diameter). The risk-scoring classifier was developed and tested on this dataset and then validated on 86 additional aPFLs.

RESULTS

The facial Integrated Dermoscopic Score (iDScore) model consisted of seven dermoscopic variables and three objective parameters (diameter ≥ 8 mm, age ≥ 70 years, male sex); the score ranged from 0 to 16. In the testing set, the facial iDScore-aided diagnosis was more accurate (AUC = 0.79 [IC 95% 0.757-0.843]) than the intuitive diagnosis proposed by dermatologists (average of 43.5%). In the management study, the score model reduced the number of benign lesions sent for biopsies by 41.5% and increased the number of LM/LMM cases sent for reflectance confocal microscopy or biopsy instead of follow-up by 66%.

CONCLUSIONS

The facial iDScore can be proposed as a feasible tool for managing patients with aPFLs.

Development and Implementation of a Web-Based International Registry Dedicated to Atypical Pigmented Skin Lesions of the Face: Teledermatologic Investigation on Epidemiology and Risk Factors

Background: Atypical pigmented facial lesions (aPFLs) often display clinical and dermoscopic equivocal and/or overlapping features, thus causing a challenging and delayed diagnosis and/or inappropriate excisions. No specific registry dedicated to aPFL paired with clinical data is available to date. Methods: The dataset is hosted on a specifically designed web platform. Each complete case was composed of the following data: (1) one dermoscopic picture; (2) one clinical picture; (3) two lesion data, that is, maximum diameter and facial location (e.g., orbital area/forehead/nose/cheek/chin/mouth); (4) patient's demographics: family history of melanoma, history of sunburns in childhood, phototype, pheomelanine, eyes/hair color, multiple nevi/dysplastic nevi on the body; and (5) acquisition device (videodermatoscope/camera-based/smartphone-based system). Results: A total of 11 dermatologic centers contributed to a final teledermoscopy database of 1,197 aPFL with a distribution of 353 lentigo maligna (LM), 146 lentigo maligna melanoma (LMM), 231 pigmented actinic keratoses, 266 solar lentigo, 125 atypical nevi, 48 seborrheic keratosis, and 28 seborrheic-lichenoid keratoses. The cheek site was involved in half of aPFL cases (50%). Compared with those with the other aPFL cases, patients with LM/LMM were predominantly men, older (69.32 ± 12.9 years on average vs. 62.69 ± 14.51), exhibited larger lesions (11.88 ± 7.74 mm average maximum diameter vs. 9.33 ± 6.46 mm), and reported a positive history of sunburn in childhood. Conclusions: The iDScore facial dataset currently represents a precious source of data suitable for the design of diagnostic support tools based on risk scoring classifiers to help dermatologists in recognizing LM/LMM among challenging aPFL in clinical practice.

Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography of lentigo maligna with horizontal and vertical histopathologic correlations

Lentigo maligna (LM) is a subtype of in situ melanoma that classically presents in elderly patients as a slowly growing lesion on sun-exposed areas that may evolve to invasive melanoma. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a new non-invasive technique for a real-time, vertical, and horizontal skin imaging with high resolution close to conventional histopathology. We present the LC-OCT features of an LM of the nose in a 49-year-old white man along with their horizontal and vertical histopathological correlations. LC-OCT was able to detect in vivo, in both horizontal and vertical imaging, the main microscopic features typical of LM by showing, in the epidermis and around the hair follicles, the presence of large, bright roundish, or dendritic atypical cells, with evident nuclei, corresponding to atypical melanocytes with a tendency toward folliculotropism. A strong correspondence between LC-OCT images and vertical and horizontal histopathological sections was observed. Our study, although limited to a single case, is indicative of the great potential of LC-OCT to improve the non-invasive diagnosis of LM.

Dermoscopy of external ear melanoma (EEM)

External ear melanoma (EEM) belongs to extremely rare melanoma locations. So far, only single cases of EEM have been described in terms of dermoscopic presentations. This case study report presents dermoscopic patterns of EEM in six patients. The retrospective case study was based on medical documentation (epidemiological, anamnestic, clinical, videodermoscopic, and histopathologic) of consecutive patients who were diagnosed with melanoma located on the external ear between January 2013 and May 2021 in three diagnostic dermatologic centers. In four of six cases, the melanoma was placed on the helix. The histopathological diagnoses included 1/6 lentigo maligna and 5/6 invasive melanomas. The dermoscopic pattern of facial melanoma (FM) was present in 3/6 cases, 1/6 exhibited the typical superficial spreading pattern (one with nodular invasion), 1/6 the multicomponent asymmetric pattern, and 1/6 the hypomelanotic type. Five melanomas presented numerous (3-6) dermoscopic structures characteristic for each dermoscopic subtype. In conclusion, dermoscopy has proved effective for detection of both difficult and easy-to-diagnose EEM, but also in differentiating their dermoscopic subtypes.

Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopic Structures and Patterns Used in Melanoma Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

Dermoscopy increases the diagnostic accuracy for melanoma. However, the accuracy of individual structures and patterns used in melanoma detection has not been systematically evaluated.

Objective

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of individual dermoscopic structures and patterns used in melanoma detection.

Data Sources

A search of Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to July 2020.

Study Selection

Studies evaluating the dermoscopic structures and patterns among melanomas in comparison with nonmelanoma lesions were included. Excluded were studies with fewer than 3 patients, studies in languages other than English or Spanish, studies not reporting dermoscopic structures per lesion type, and studies assessing only nail, mucosal, acral, facial, or metastatic melanomas or melanomas on chronically sun-damaged skin. Multiple reviewers applied these criteria, and 0.7% of studies met selection criteria.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses reporting guideline and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology reporting guideline were followed. Guidelines were applied via independent extraction by multiple observers. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The prespecified outcome measures were diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and risk (odds ratio [OR]) of melanoma for the following dermoscopic structures/patterns: atypical dots/globules, atypical network, blue-white veil, negative network, off-centered blotch, peripheral-tan structureless areas, atypical vessels (eg, linear irregular, polymorphous), pseudopods, streaks, regression (ie, peppering, scarlike areas), shiny white structures, angulated lines, irregular pigmentation, and a multicomponent pattern.

Results

A total of 40 studies including 22 796 skin lesions and 5736 melanomas were evaluated. The structures and patterns with the highest ORs were shiny white structures (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.5-17.9), pseudopods (OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.7-16.1), irregular pigmentation (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 2.0-20.5), blue-white veil (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 3.7-10.7), and peppering (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 2.4-16.1). The structures with the highest specificity were pseudopods (97.3%; 95% CI, 94.3%-98.7%), shiny white structures (93.6%; 95% CI, 85.6%-97.3%), peppering (93.4%; 95% CI, 81.9%-97.8%), and streaks (92.1%; 95% CI, 88.4%-94.7%), whereas features with the highest sensitivity were irregular pigmentation (62.3%; 95% CI, 31.2%-85.8%), blue-white veil (60.6%; 95% CI, 46.7%-72.9%), atypical network (56.8%; 95% CI, 43.6%-69.2%), and a multicomponent pattern (53.7%; 95% CI, 40.4%-66.4%).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis support the diagnostic importance of dermoscopic structures associated with melanoma detection (eg, shiny white structures, blue-white veil), further corroborate the importance of the overall pattern, and may suggest a hierarchy in the significance of these structures and patterns.