Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Anlotinib plus docetaxel vs. docetaxel alone for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients who failed first-line treatment: A multicenter, randomized phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

Given the modest efficacy of docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), this study assesses the therapeutic potential and safety profile of anlotinib in combination with docetaxel compared to docetaxel monotherapy as a second-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC experiencing failure with first-line platinum-based regimens were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either anlotinib plus docetaxel or docetaxel alone. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety as secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were randomized. The combination of anlotinib and docetaxel significantly extended median PFS to 4.4 months compared to 1.6 months for docetaxel alone (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.63, P = 0.0002), and also demonstrated superior ORR (32.5 % vs. 9.3 %, P = 0.0089) and DCR (87.5 % vs. 53.5 %, P = 0.0007). Median OS was observed at 12.0 months in the combination group vs. 10.9 months in the monotherapy group (HR = 0.82, 95 % CI: 0.47-1.43, P = 0.4803). For patients previously treated with immunotherapy, the median PFS was notably longer at 7.8 vs. 1.7 months (HR = 0.22, 95 % CI: 0.09-0.51, P = 0.0290). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events, predominantly leukopenia (15.0 % vs. 7.0 %) and neutropenia (10.0 % vs. 5.0 %), was manageable across both groups.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus docetaxel offers a viable therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced NSCLC who failed first-line platinum-based treatments.

Radiotherapy plus temozolomide with or without anlotinib in H3K27M-mutant diffuse midline glioma: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Besides the hallmark of H3K27M mutation, aberrant amplifications of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are commonly observed in diffuse midline glioma (DMG), a highly malignant brain tumor with dismal prognosis. Here, we intended to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a multitarget RTK inhibitor anlotinib in patients with H3K27M-DMG.

METHODS

A total of 40 newly diagnosed H3K27M-DMG patients including 15 with anlotinib and 25 without anlotinib treatment were retrospectively enrolled in this cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicities were assessed and compared.

RESULTS

The median PFS and OS of all patients in this cohort were 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.5-11.3) and 15.5 months (95% CI, 12.6-17.1), respectively. According to the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, the disease control rate in the anlotinib group [93.3%, 95% confidence interval (CI), 70.2-98.8] was significantly higher than those without anlotinib (64%, 95% CI: 40.5-79.8, p = 0.039). The median PFS of patients with and without anlotinib was 11.6 months (95% CI, 7.8-14.3) and 6.4 months (95% CI, 4.3-10.3), respectively. Both the median PFS and OS of DMG patients treated with anlotinib were longer than those without anlotinib in the infratentorial patients (PFS: 10.3 vs. 5.4 months, p = 0.006; OS: 16.6 vs. 8.7 months, p = 0.016). Multivariate analysis also indicated anlotinib (HR: 0.243, 95% CI: 0.066-0.896, p = 0.034) was an independent prognosticator for longer OS in the infratentorial subgroup. In addition, the adverse events of anlotinib administration were tolerable in the whole cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

This study first reported that anlotinib combined with Stupp regimen is a safe and feasible regimen for newly diagnosed patients with H3K27M-DMG. Further, anlotinib showed significant efficacy for H3K27M-DMG located in the infratentorial region.

Research Progress on Mechanism and Management of Adverse Drug Reactions of Anlotinib

Anti-angiogenesis therapy plays a vital role in the treatment of tumors, with anlotinib as its representative targeted drug. Anlotinib is a novel oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with inhibitory effects on tumor growth tumor angiogenesis. In Phase III clinical trials, anlotinib demonstrated better overall survival and progression-free survival than placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and was approved for the first time as a third-line treatment for refractory advanced NSCLC. Going far beyond that, anlotinib has shown encouraging results in a variety of malignancies, including medullary thyroid carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Nevertheless, anlotinib has been subject to some controversy in terms of adverse events due to its widespread use. In this review, the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, adverse reactions in clinical use and management of anlotinib were summarized.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib-Containing Regimens in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study

Purpose

Anlotinib is widely used in the clinical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), alone or in combination with other anticancer drugs. The aim of this study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib-containing regimens.

Patients and Methods

Confirmed advanced NSCLC patients who had received anlotinib alone or in combination were enrolled. An overall analysis of the efficacy and safety of anlotinib was performed in all patients, and then subgroup analysis was used to further compare the efficacy between anlotinib monotherapy and combination therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were ADR, ORR, and DCR.

Results

A total of 240 patients were included. The overall median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.1-9.9 months). Anlotinib treatment regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) and whether they received previous antiangiogenesis were associated with PFS. Anlotinib plus immunotherapy achieved longer PFS than anlotinib monotherapy (median PFS: 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.007). Stratification analysis showed the PFS of anlotinib plus immunotherapy was significantly longer in male, adenocarcinoma, <=65 years old, patients stage IV, EGFR wild type, with extrathoracic metastasis, performance status scores ≥2, the first-line treatment, patients with a history of hypertension and no previous antiangiogenesis than anlotinib monotherapy. The median PFS of anlotinib plus chemotherapy, targeted therapy was slightly longer than anlotinib alone (respectively, 10.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.095; 9.5 vs 6.5 months, p=0.177). Adverse reactions were mostly mild and acceptable, with hypertension being the most common.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is effective and tolerable in advanced NSCLC patients. Immunotherapy combination with anlotinib significantly improved PFS. The efficacy of anlotinib may be impaired by previous antiangiogenic therapy, which can be investigated in further studies.

Anlotinib plus icotinib as a potential treatment option for EGFR-mutated advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with concurrent mutations: final analysis of the prospective phase 2, multicenter ALTER-L004 study

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and concurrent mutations have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to examine anlotinib plus icotinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutation with or without concurrent mutations.

METHODS

This phase 2, single-arm, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03736837) was performed at five hospitals in China from December 2018 to November 2020. Non-squamous NSCLC cases with EGFR-sensitizing mutations were treated with anlotinib and icotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.

RESULTS

Sixty participants were enrolled, including 31 (52%) and 29 (48%) with concurrent mutations and pathogenic concurrent mutations, respectively. The median follow-up was 26.9 (range, 15.0-38.9) months. ORR and DCR were 68.5% and 98.2%, respectively. Median PFS was 15.1 (95%CI: 12.6-17.6) months which met the primary endpoint, median DoR was 13.5 (95%CI: 10.0-17.1) months, and median OS was 30.0 (95%CI: 25.5-34.5) months. Median PFS and OS in patients with pathogenic concurrent mutations were 15.6 (95%CI: 12.5-18.7) months and not reached (95%CI: 17.46 months to not reached), respectively. All patients experienced TRAEs, including 26 (43%) and 1 (1.7%) who had grade ≥ 3 and serious treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with icotinib was effective and well-tolerated as a first-line treatment option for EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC with or without concurrent mutations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03736837.

Effect and outcomes analysis of anlotinib in non-small cell lung cancer patients with liver metastasis: results from the ALTER 0303 phase 3 randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

Liver metastasis (LM) is common in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and always predicted worse outcomes with no effective therapy. We aimed to evaluate the effects and prognosis in LM patients treated with anlotinib.

METHODS

The present study is a post hoc analysis based on a multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 randomized clinical trial which designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC. A total of 437 patients were enrolled in present study, and 78 patients with LM.

RESULTS

Patients with LM showed a worse outcome compared to those without LM (PFS median, 2.6 vs 4.2 months), and OS (median, 5.6 vs 9.4 months, both P < 0.0001). The anlotinib was associated with longer PFS (median, 3.0 months) compared with placebo (median, 0.9 months), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.23 (95%CI, 0.12-0.42; P < 0.0001). Furthermore, OS was marginally significantly better in anlotinib group (median 6.6 months), compared with placebo (median 4.0 months), HR 0.61 (95%CI, 0.36-1.02; P = 0.055). Multivariate analysis confirmed normal peripheral blood LDH/TBiL level predicted better PFS and OS, lower ECOG score acted as independently prognostic factor for superior OS. Anlotinib was more associated with hand-foot syndrome (7.7% vs 0) and serum TSH level rise (7.7% vs 3.8%) and well tolerated, all AEs were no more than grade 3.

CONCLUSION

Patients with LM had a dismal prognosis, anlotinib could lead to a better PFS in pretreated NSCLC patients, which suggested anlotinib is a potential third-line or further therapy in these patients.

Cardiovascular toxicity associated with the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor anlotinib

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib, a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been shown to have encouraging activity against many tumors, but its cardiovascular toxicity has not been investigated specifically. We reviewed anlotinib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in patients and explored its cardiotoxicity in vitro.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all cardiovascular events in 62 patients with unresectable tumors who had taken anlotinib and mainly examined anlotinib's effects on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and blood pressure. Besides, we investigated its cardiotoxicity in Neonatal Rat Ventricular Myocytes (NRVMs).

RESULTS

All-grade hypertension was seen in 60 patients (97%), and 25 individuals (40%) developed grade 3 hypertension. Significant univariate associations for predictors of post-treatment hypertension were age (P<0.001), BMI (P=0.003), ECOG PS(P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (P=0.035), dose of anlotinib (P=0.025). Multivariate analysis suggested that age [odds ratio (OR) 1.079, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.029-1.130, P= 0.001] and BMI [OR 3.448, 95% CI: 1.410-8.433, P= 0.007] were the only significant independent predictors. No grade 3/4 left ventricular systolic dysfunction was reported. One patient (2%) had acute myocardial infarction, leading to cardiac death. In vitro, western blotting results showed that the levels of ANP, BNP, c-Myc and Cleaved Caspase3 were notably increased and cardiomyocyte apoptosis was strikingly increased in anlotinib group, as detected by TUNEL staining and Annexin V-FITC/PI flow cytometry.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study results showed that anlotinib could induce rat cardiomyocytes apoptosis. Nonetheless, anlotinib-associated cardiovascular toxicity was acceptable and manageable for patients with unresectable tumors.

Long-term survival with anlotinib as a front-line treatment in an elderly NSCLC patient: A case report

Background

Half of the population of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are older than 70 years and have limited therapeutic options due to poor tolerance and being excluded in most clinical trials. Anlotinib hydrochloride, a novel oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved for the standard third-line treatment for NSCLC in China. Herein we report an elderly NSCLC patient without any driver gene mutations who was undergoing anlotinib as a front-line treatment and who achieved long-term survival.

Case summary

The 77-year-old male patient was admitted to the hospital for chest tightness after engaging in physical activity for a week. The patient has been diagnosed with stage IIIB driver gene-negative squamous cell lung carcinoma. After that, he was treated with anlotinib for 2 years and 10 months from the first diagnosis until the last disease progression. Briefly, anlotinib combined with platinum-based chemotherapy was performed as the first-line therapy over six cycles. After 6 more cycles of anlotinib monotherapy maintenance, disease progression occurred. Then, anlotinib combined with tegafur was administered as a salvage treatment, and the disease was controlled again. After 29 cycles of anlotinib combined with tegafur regimens, the disease progressed finally. The patient achieved a total of 34 months of progression-free survival after anlotinib was used as the front-line treatment. He is still alive with a good performance status now (performance status score: 1).

Conclusion

This patient achieved long-term survival using anlotinib as a front-line regimen combined with chemotherapy.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based treatment in metastatic breast cancer patients

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib-based treatment in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients with failure of standard treatment.

Methods

We collected the medical data of 56 female patients with the diagnosis of MBC and had failed the standard treatment before. These patients received at least two cycles of anlotinib-based treatment as the second-line or beyond treatment between October 2019 and April 2022 in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. The primary endpoint of our study was progression-free survival (PFS), and it was estimated with Kaplan-Meier. The second end points were disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and side effects.

Results

The median PFS time of a total of 56 patients was 5.7 months (95% CI, 3.17-8.22months). The ORR and DCR was 28.6% and 71.4%, respectively. In second-line, third-line, and beyond treatment, the median PFS was 11.7 months, 8.7 months, and 4.7 months, respectively. In different subtype of breast cancer, the median PFS was 5.6 months, 5.7months, and 6.4 months in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+), hormone receptor positive and HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-), and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, respectively. Most adverse effects were clinically manageable, and the most common events were platelet count decrease (35.7%), hand-foot syndrome (19.6%), diarrhea (19.6%), and fatigue (17.9%). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were platelet count decrease (25.0%), diarrhea (7.1%), and oral mucositis (5.4%).

Conclusion

Anlotinib-based treatment showed good efficacy and manageable toxicity in multi-line treatment of MBC patients who failed the standard treatment.

Anlotinib exerts potent antileukemic activities in Ph chromosome negative and positive B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia via perturbation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

OBJECTIVES

Despite advances in the development of novel targeted therapies, the need for B-ALL alternative treatments has not been met. Anlotinib could blunt the proangiogenic activity of VEGFR, PDGFR, and FGFR, and has shown strong antitumor activities across multiple tumors. However, anlotinib cytotoxicity against B-ALL has not ever been evaluated, thus prompting us to initiate this study.

METHODS

Expression2Kinases program was used to identify potential treatment targets. Cell viability and apoptosis were determined by CCK-8 and Annexin V/PI staining kit, respectively. qRT-PCR and Western blotting were utilized to investigate the molecular mechanisms. In vivo antileukemia activity of Anlotinib was evaluated in a Ph⁺ B-ALL patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) model.

RESULTS

Compared with treatment-naive B-ALL cases, RR B-ALL patients had higher activities in the VEGF/VEGFR signaling and the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. Exposure of Ph^- and Ph⁺ B-ALL cells to anlotinib resulted in significant cell viability reduction, apoptosis enhancement, and cell cycle arrest at G2/M phase. Importantly, anlotinib treatment led to remarkably decreased leukemia burdens and extended the survival period in a Ph⁺ B-ALL PDX model. Blockade of the role of the proangiogenic mediators, comprising VEGFR2, PDGFR-beta, and FGFR3, played a critical role in the cytotoxicity of anlotinib against Ph^- and Ph⁺ B-ALL. Moreover, anlotinib dampened the activity of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway that resides in the convergence of the three mentioned proangiogenic signals.

CONCLUSION

This work provides impressive preclinical evidence of anlotinib against Ph^- and Ph⁺ B-ALL and raises a rationale for future clinical evaluation of this drug in the management of Ph^- and Ph⁺ B-ALL.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib in the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Observation Study

Aims

This study aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) in the real world, as first-line maintenance therapy, second-line, and above.

Methods

Clinical data of 109 patients with SCLC treated with anlotinib and hospitalized at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from June 2018 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Analysis of short-term efficacy and survival was performed, with p<0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Results

The median progression-free survival (mPFS) of anlotinib monotherapy used as first-line maintenance treatment of SCLC was 6.3 months (11.7 months in the limited phase and 5.8 months in the extensive phase) and median overall survival (mOS) was 16.7 months (not reached in limited phase, 12.6 months in extensive phase). In second-line treatment, anlotinib with chemotherapy prolonged PFS and OS as compared to anlotinib monotherapy (p<0.05). In third-line and above treatment, there was no improvement in mPFS with the chemotherapy combination regimen compared to anlotinib monotherapy (3.6 months vs. 3.8 months, p=0.398), with a trend toward impaired mOS (8.5 months vs. not achieved, p=0.060). Univariate analyses and multivariate analyses revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and liver metastases were independent prognostic factors affecting PFS and OS. No new anlotinib-related adverse reactions were identified.

Conclusion

Anlotinib was effective for first-line maintenance and second-line treatment, and the chemotherapy combination regimen was superior to monotherapy when applied as second-line treatment. However, this trend was not observed in third-line and above therapy.

Feasibility and Safety of Anlotinib Monotherapy for Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Objective

This study was to investigate the feasibility and safety of anlotinib monotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) retrospectively.

Methods

This study was designed as a real-world study. A total of 83 patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC who received anlotinib monotherapy were included. Demographic characteristics of the patients, efficacy data of the treatment and adverse reactions during the treatment were documented and analyzed through the electronic medical record system in the hospital. All the patients were followed up regularly. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), safety profile and PFS analysis according to adverse reactions.

Results

A total of 83 patients with ESCC who received anlotinib monotherapy were included. Partial response was observed in 7 patients, stable disease was noted in 51 patients and progressive disease was found in 25 patients, which yielded an ORR of 8.4% (95% CI: 3.5–16.6%), and a DCR of 69.9% (95% CI: 58.8–79.5%). Furthermore, the median PFS of the 83 patients with advanced ESCC was 3.3 months (95% CI: 2.20–4.40) and the median OS was 7.8 months (95% CI: 5.40–10.20). Common adverse reactions among the 83 patients were hypertension (51.8%), fatigue (48.2%), weight loss (41.0%), diarrhea (34.9) and hand-foot syndrome (30.1%). Correlation analysis between hypertension status and PFS suggested that PFS of the patients with hypertension was longer than that of those with non-hypertension (median PFS: 4.5 vs 3.0 months, P = 0.019).

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity for patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic ESCC. Hypertension that occurs during anlotinib administration might be used as a potential biomarker to predict PFS of patients with ESCC. The conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Targeting ADRB2 enhances sensitivity of non-small cell lung cancer to VEGFR2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have achieved remarkable clinical progress in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer; however, resistance has limited their therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of VEGF-TKI and ICI resistance will help to develop effective treatment strategies for patients with advanced NSCLC. Our results suggested that treatment with VEGFR2-TKIs upregulated ADRB2 expression in NSCLC cells. Propranolol, a common ADRB2 antagonist, significantly enhanced the therapeutic effect of VEGFR2-TKIs by inhibiting the ADRB2 signaling pathway in NSCLC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanically, the treatment-induced ADRB2 upregulation and the enhancement of ADRB2/VEGFR2 interaction caused resistance to VEGFR2-TKIs in NSCLC. And the inhibition of the ADRB2/CREB/PSAT1 signaling pathway sensitized cells to VEGFR2-TKIs. We demonstrated that ADRB2 signaling is crucial in mediating resistance to VEGFR2-TKIs and provided a novel promising combinatory approach to enhance the antitumor effect of VEGFR2-TKIs in NSCLC combining with propranolol.

Clinical outcomes and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC: A retrospective study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Although osimertinib achieved convincing efficacy for patients with EGFR T790M-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as second-line treatment in the AURA3 clinical trials, patients developed drug resistance ultimately. Therefore, the present study was to investigate the clinical outcome and safety of osimertinib plus anlotinib for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

Designed as a retrospective study, this study consecutively included a total of 33 patients with advanced NSCLC who possessed a EGFR T790M-positive mutation and progressed after the first-line therapy. Eligible patients were treated with osimertinib plus anlotinib. Baseline characteristics of the patients were collected during hospitalization. Efficacy of the combination regimen was assessed with the change of target lesion using imaging evidence according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected and documented during the treatment. Univariate analysis according to baseline characteristic subgroups was performed using log-rank test, and multivariate analysis was carried out by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The best overall response of the patients during osimertinib and anlotinib combination indicated that complete response was found in one patient, partial response was observed in 26 patients, stable disease was noted in 5 patients and progressive disease was reported in one patient. Therefore, objective response rate (ORR) of the combination regimen was 81.8% (95%CI: 64.5%-93.0%), and disease control rate (DCR) was 97.0% (95%CI: 84.2%-99.9%). Furthermore, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 33 patients with NSCLC was 15.5 months (95%CI: 6.19-24.81). In addition, the median overall survival (OS) of the 33 patients with NSCLC was 23.8 months (95% CI: 17.67-29.93). Safety profile suggested that the most common adverse reactions of the patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib plus osimertinib were hypertension (63.6%), fatigue (57.6%), diarrhoea (48.5%%), dermal toxicity (39.4%) and proteinuria (33.3%). Interestingly, multivariate Cox regression analysis for PFS demonstrated that ECOG performance status was an independent factor to predict the PFS of the combination regimen.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Osimertinib plus anlotinib regimen preliminarily exhibited encouraging clinical outcomes and acceptable safety profile for patients with previously treated EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC numerically. This conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials.

A Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Anlotinib in Patients With Lung Cancer With or Without Previous Antiangiogenic Therapy

Objective

The purpose of this study was to initially investigate the effect of previous antiangiogenic therapy (bevacizumab and endostatin) on the efficacy of anlotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic lung cancer (LC).

Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of patients with LC treated with anlotinib and divided them into group A (treated with anlotinib after the failure of previous antiangiogenic drugs and group B (no prior use of antiangiogenic drugs). We used propensity score matching (PSM) for confounding factors between the groups. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were also recorded.

Results

A total of 160 patients were included in the analysis. The median OS in groups A and group B was 11.8 months and 16.1 months (P=0.120), whereas the median PFS was 3.1 months and 4.7 months (P=0.009), respectively. Moreover, the objective response rate (ORR) of the two groups was 9.6% and 10.4% (P=0.874), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71.1% and 80.5% (P=0.165).

After PSM (n=46), baseline characteristics were comparable between groups A and B. Furthermore, the median OS of the two groups was 14.6 months and 16.2 months (P=0.320), whereas the median PFS was 3.5 months and 4.5 months (P=0.040), respectively. Moreover, the ORR of the two groups were 13.0% and 10.9% (P=0.748), and the DCR were 78.3% and 82.6% (P=0.599), respectively.

Conclusions

Previous antiangiogenic treatments may affect the PFS of patients who receive anlotinib later, but it might not affect the patient’s ORR and OS.

Implication of Polymorphism on the Prognosis of Anlotinib Monotherapy for Patients With Treatment-Refractory Advanced NSCLC: An Exploratory Study

Background: This study aimed to investigate the implication of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor 2 (VEGFR2) polymorphism on the prognosis of anlotinib monotherapy among patients with treatment-refractory advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: Designed as a retrospective study, this study included a total of 129 patients with treatment-refractory advanced NSCLC who were administered with anlotinib monotherapy. The efficacy of the patients was assessed regularly. The prognosis was performed and adverse reactions during anlotinib administration were collected. Available and appropriate biological specimens of the 129 patients were collected to perform VEGFR2 polymorphism analysis and VEGFR2 gene mRNA expression analysis accordingly. Association analysis between genotype status of VEGFR2 polymorphism and other variables was implemented in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Efficacy data indicated that the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the 129 patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib monotherapy was 9.3% (95% CI: 4.9%-15.7%) and 78.3% (95%CI: 70.2%-85.1%), respectively. Additionally, prognostic data suggested that the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the 129 patients with NSCLC were 4.1 months (95%CI: 2.84-5.36) and 10.1 months (95%CI: 8.58-11.62), respectively. Furthermore, polymorphism analysis indicated that polymorphism of 4397T>C in VEGFR2 was of clinical significance in the exploratory analysis, which exhibited that the median PFS of patients with TC/CC and TT genotype of 4397T>C polymorphism were 2.8 and 5.0 months, respectively (P = .009). Additionally, patients with TT genotype conferred a superior OS compared with those with TC/CC genotype (median OS: 11.5 vs 7.3 months, P = .016). Interestingly, mRNA expression of the VEGFR2 gene suggested that mRNA expression of VEGFR2 in PBMC specimens of patients with TC/CC genotype was significantly higher than that of patients with TT genotype (P < .001). Conclusion: Anlotinib monotherapy exhibited potential efficacy for patients with treatment-refractory advanced NSCLC. VEGFR2 polymorphism 4397T>C might be used as a promising biomarker to predict the survival of patients with NSCLC who received anlotinib administration.

Efficacy and Safety of Drug-Eluting Bead Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Anlotinib in Patients With Advanced Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer

Aim: The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination therapy of drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization plus anlotinib oral administration in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods: Consecutive data from 51 patients with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively collected from February 2018 to August 2019. All patients underwent drug-eluting bead bronchial arterial chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) followed by anlotinib treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated and analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test, and factors associated with OS and PFS were assessed by a Cox proportional hazards test. Treatment response at 30 days was assessed by enhanced computed tomography (CT), and then the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were calculated. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also evaluated.

Results: The median OS was 18.4 months (95% CI, 16.6–20.2 months), and the median PFS was 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.2–10.6 months). The ORR and DCR for the whole cohort were 21.6 and 100%, respectively, at 30 days after the first cycle of treatment. Most of the treatment-related adverse reactions were mild and moderate and included anorexia, hypertension, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome. Only eight (15.7%) patients developed grade 3 TRAEs. No deaths or other serious adverse reactions occurred. Both TNM stage and brain metastasis were independent risk factors for OS and PFS.

Conclusion: DEB-BACE concomitant with anlotinib has promising efficacy and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Prognostic factors of patients with advanced lung cancer treated with anlotinib: a retrospective cohort study

Objective

Our study aimed to evaluate the main factors affecting the efficacy of anlotinib to determine the therapeutically dominant populations.

Methods

The medical records of patients with lung cancer who were treated with anlotinib from July 2018 to February 2020 at Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University were retrospectively reviewed. The optimal cutoff prognostic nutritional index (PNI) value for predicting efficacy was determined according to receiver operating characteristic curves. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated and compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log‐rank test. The prognostic values of each variable were evaluated with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.

Results

The overall disease control rate of 44 patients with lung cancer was 93.2% (41/44). The median PFS was 5.0 months (95% [confidence interval] CI: 2.2–7.8), and the median OS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 3.6–9.3). The multivariate analysis results indicated that hand–foot syndrome and high PNI values were independent protective factors of PFS and OS.

Conclusions

Anlotinib was effective in treating locally advanced or advanced lung cancer. High pretreatment PNI scores and the presence of hand–foot syndrome after treatment were independent prognostic markers for favorable OS and PFS.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib Monotherapy as Third-Line Therapy for Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Exploratory Study

Purpose

The present study was to investigate the real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy as third-line therapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 83 elderly patients (>65 years) with NSCLC who were progressed at least two lines of previous systemic therapy were recruited retrospectively. Patients were treated with anlotinib monotherapy (12 mg or 10 mg). Efficacy of anlotinib was assessed and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected during anlotinib administration. Univariate analysis was performed using Log rank test and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis. Additionally, prognostic analysis according to common adverse reactions was implemented to identify the potential clinical significance.

Results

The best overall response of the 83 elderly patients during anlotinib monotherapy indicated that partial response (PR) was observed in six patients, stable disease (SD) was noted in 59 patients, and progressive disease (PD) was reported in 18 patients. Consequently, the objective response rate (ORR) was 7.2% (95% CI=2.7–15.1%) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 78.3% (95% CI=67.9–86.6%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 83 elderly patients with NSCLC was 4.2 months (95% CI=3.51–4.89). Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) of the 83 patients was 9.6 months (95% CI=6.65–12.55). The safety profile suggested that the relatively common adverse reactions of the elderly patients with ES-SCLC receiving anlotinib therapy were hypertension (49.4%), fatigue (45.8%), and hand–foot syndrome (39.8%). Interestingly, association analysis exhibited that the median PFS of patients with hypertension and non-hypertension was 4.5 and 3.0 months, respectively (χ²=6.306, P=0.012).

Conclusion

Anlotinib monotherapy demonstrated a satisfactory efficacy and tolerable safety profile in third-line settings for elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Patients who experienced a hypertension adverse reaction induced by anlotinib therapy might confer superior PFS. The conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Effect of prior thoracic radiotherapy on prognosis in relapsed small cell lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib: a subgroup analysis of the ALTER 1202 trial

Background

In ALTER 1202, anlotinib prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The aim of this study was to explore the effect of front-line thoracic radiotherapy (RT) on the benefits of anlotinib as a third-line-or-beyond treatment.

Methods

This was a subgroup analysis of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (ALTER 1202). The participants were divided into RT (previous thoracic RT) and non-RT subgroups. The outcomes included PFS, OS, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety.

Results

In the ALTER 1202 trial, 68 participants (anlotinib, n=46; placebo, n=22) received RT and 51 participants (anlotinib, n=35; placebo, n=16) did not. PFS was longer for anlotinib versus placebo in both the RT (5.49 vs. 0.69 months; P<0.001) and non-RT (2.83 vs. 0.76 months; P<0.001) subgroups. In the RT subgroup, the OS was longer for anlotinib vs. placebo (9.49 vs. 4.90 months; P=0.039). No differences were found in the ORR, but the DCR was higher in the anlotinib arm of the RT subgroup compared with the placebo arm (73.9% vs. 9.1%, P<0.001) and the non-RT subgroup (68.6% vs. 18.8%; P=0.002).

Conclusions

In relapsed SCLC patients with previous thoracic RT, anlotinib might have DCR, PFS, and OS benefits compared with placebo. In those without previous thoracic RT patients, anlotinib might have DCR and PFS benefits compared with placebo. The safety was similar between anlotinib and placebo groups.

Anlotinib-Induced Hypertension: Current Concepts and Future Prospects

BACKGROUND

Anlotinib is a new tyrosine kinase inhibitor developed in China that targets the receptors for vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and stem cell factor. Therefore, anlotinib inhibits tumor angiogenesis, representing a new therapeutic alternative for lung cancer. Hypertension is one of its most common adverse effects, leading to discontinuation of the drug and limited clinical usefulness.

OBJECTIVE

The present review aims to summarize the evidence on the prevalence, physiopathology, and management of anlotinib-induced hypertension, as well as its effect on the cancer prognosis.

METHOD

Searches in Medline, Cochrane Central Library, and Embase were performed using the following terms: anlotinib, adverse effect, hypertension, clinical trial, vascular endothelial growth factor, and antiangiogenic drugs. Citations were also identified by checking the reference sections of selected papers.

RESULTS

Except for a phase I clinical trial with a small sample size (n = 6), almost all the clinical trials on anlotinib have reported the development of anlotinib-induced hypertension. In these trials, the incidence of hypertension ranged from 13% to 67.7%, and that of grade 3/4 hypertension ranged from4.8% to 16%. Alterations in nitric oxide, endothelin-1, microvascular rarefaction, selective vasoconstrictions, and renal injury have been cited as potential mechanisms leading to anlotinib-induced hypertension. When needed, treatment may include general hygienic measures and pharmacotherapy in some cases.

CONCLUSIONS

To effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension, early prevention, a reasonable dosage regimen, and appropriate treatment are critical to effectively manage anlotinib-induced hypertension. Additionally, anlotinib-induced hypertension may be considered a marker for predicting efficacy.

Anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibody, camrelizumab for advanced NSCLCs after multiple lines treatment: An open-label, dose escalation and expansion study

OBJECTIVES

Combined therapy should be invested for those patients who are refractory to first-line therapy. Anti-angiogenic agents could enhance tumor immunity response. We designed a phase IB clinical trial and analyzed the effectiveness and safety of anlotinib combined with PD-1inhibitors Camrelizumab for multi-line pretreated and failed advanced NSCLC to explore the synergistic effect of anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy.

METHODS

All enrolled patients should receive camrelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. Eligible patients were randomized successively to three dose cohorts of Anlotinib in a dose escalation clinical setting. Once maximal tolerable dose was established, the primary end point of this study was progression-free survival, overall survival and safety. Risk factor was an exploratory end point.

RESULTS

The identified expansion dose for anlotinib was 12 mg. The median PFS of ITT patients was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4.3-12.1 months). And the mOS was 12.7 months (95% CI, 10.2-15.1 months). There was significant difference of mPFS between the 8 mg cohort and the 12 mg cohort (5.6 m vs.11.0 m, p = 0.04). Patients with brain metastasis had a significantly higher risk of death (HR 5.90; 95% CI 2.01-17.30; P = 0.001). Patients whose ECOG was 0 and 1 had a significantly lower risk of death (HR 0.36; 95% CI 0.14-0.91; P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib plus camrelizumab had shown promising efficacy and manageable toxicity as a second-line or later-line treatment for NSCLCs, especially in the 12 mg cohorts. Large-scale phase III clinical trials are needed to further explore the rational combination models and biomarkers.

The real-world efficacy and safety of anlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Anlotinib is an anti-angiogenetic multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) in the real world.

METHODS

Patients with aNSCLC receiving anlotinib were enrolled in two cohorts (treatment naive and previously treated). The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and anlotinib-related adverse events (ar-AEs).

RESULTS

203 patients accrued in the study. In the treatment-naïve cohort (n = 80), the PFS was 7.4 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1-10.7) and OS was 10.8 (95% CI 5.8-15.8) months of monotherapy group (immature survival for combination group). In previously treated cohort (n = 123), the PFS was 8.0 months (95% CI 6.1-9.9) in the combination group and 4.3 months (95% CI 2.1-6.6) in the monotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.49; 95% CI 0.29-0.83; p = 0.007), respectively. The OS was 18.5 months (95% CI 10.5-26.6) in the combination group and 7.8 months (95% CI 7.1-8.4) in the monotherapy group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.22-0.66; p = 0.001), respectively. The ar-AEs of grade ≥ 3 in the monotherapy and the combination groups were hypertension (9.0 and 8.7%), fatigue (8.1 and 7.6%), hand-foot syndrome (8.1 and 6.5%), diarrhea (5.4 and 8.7%), proteinuria (5.4 and 5.4%), and mucositis oral (6.3 and 8.7%).

CONCLUSION

In aNSCLC, anlotinib monotherapy has a promising efficacy in the first-line setting. It may be an option for those who are ineligible for chemotherapy; anlotinib combination therapy in a ≥ second-line setting showed manageable toxicities and encouraging efficacy, indicating a good application prospect.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered with ISRCTN Registry (ID ISRCTN35543977) on January 26th, 2021 and Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2000032265) on April 4th, 2020.

Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib With and Without Immunotherapy in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Aims

Combination of anti-angiogenesis therapy and immunotherapy has showed synergistic effects in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib with and without immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Methods

Pathologically confirmed NSCLC patients (stage IIIB-IV) receiving anlotinib between November 2018 and February 2020 were enrolled for retrospective analysis. The outcomes and safety of overall patients were evaluated, and the efficacies of anlotinib plus immunotherapy and anlotinib alone was compared. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

A total of 80 patients (median age: 62 years, range: 29-86 years) were included. Overall median PFS was 4.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-5.9 months). In univariate analysis, patients without EGFR mutation, previous EGFR target therapy, and brain metastasis had significantly longer PFS. Cox regression analysis showed that only brain metastasis was an independent predictor of PFS. The median PFS of patients receiving anlotinib plus immunotherapy was slightly longer than that of patients receiving anlotinib alone (4.2 vs 3.1 months); however, the difference was not statistically significant. A tendency of longer median PFS was observed in patients with adenocarcinoma, EGFR wild type, stage IV, no liver metastasis, former smoker, ≥2 previous treatment lines, no previous VEGF or EGFR target therapies in anlotinib plus immunotherapy group. Treatments with anlotinib alone or anlotinib plus immunotherapy were well tolerable. The most common adverse events were fatigue, decreased hemoglobin count, hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, oral mucositis and hoarseness.

Conclusion

Anlotinib is well tolerable and effective in advanced NSCLC patients. Brain metastasis is an independent predictor of PFS in NSCLC patients receiving anlotinib. Future prospective studies with larger sample size and extended follow-up are needed to confirm the clinical benefit in NSCLC patients treated with anlotinib combined with immunotherapy.

Anlotinib as a post-third-line therapy for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

There is no standard treatment strategy for the third-line and above treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the effects of anlotinib in patients with NSCLC. Data was collected from a group of advanced lung cancer patients who received anlotinib as a third-line or post-third-line treatment between 2017 and 2019. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the progression-free survival (PFS) of these lung cancer patients treated with anlotinib. Univariate analysis was performed using the log-rank test. Forest plot was used for subgroup analysis.Our study included 44 patients. Oral anlotinib was used as a third-line treatment to treat 26 patients, and as a fourth-line or multiline treatment in 18 patients. The objective control rate was 5%, the disease control rate was 89%, and the median PFS was 4.0 months with a 95% confidence interval. Common toxicities included anorexia, hypertension, and fatigue. Anlotinib demonstrated promising efficacy and was well tolerated with controlled toxicity in patients with NSCLC.

Anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade for the treatment of lung cancer: a real-world retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SCLC (n = 28) and NSCLC (n = 177) patients who received treatment at Hunan Cancer Hospital between June 1, 2019, and July 1, 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment responses were compared among patients who received combination therapy of anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor, or monotherapy of either chemotherapy or PD-1 inhibitor. Independent prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with relapsed SCLC who received anlotinib plus PD-1 inhibitor as a ≥ second-line therapy (n = 14) had a significantly longer PFS than those who received PD-1 inhibitor alone (n = 14, 5.0 vs. 3.0 months; P = 0.005). For patients with previously untreated wild-type NSCLC, the combination therapy in the first-line setting (n = 6) provided a marginally longer PFS than mono-chemotherapy (n = 6, 8.0 vs. 3.0 months; P = 0.075). For patients with relapsed NSCLC, the combination therapy in the  ≥ second-line setting (n = 62) resulted in significantly higher objective response rate (19.3 vs. 5.0 vs. 2.4%; P = 0.013) and longer PFS (8.0 vs. 2.0 vs. 2.0 months; P <0.001) as compared to monotherapy of either chemotherapy (n = 41) or PD-1 inhibitor (n = 62). Anlotinib and PD-1 blockade combination therapy was an independent predictive factor of longer PFS (P <0.001).

CONCLUSION

The combination of anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitor has promising efficacy and manageable toxicity as a second- or later-line treatment of relapsed NSCLC and possibly for relapsed SCLC.

Efficacy and Safety of Anlotinib for Elderly Patients with Previously Treated Extensive-Stage SCLC and the Prognostic Significance of Common Adverse Reactions

Background

This study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib for elderly patients with previously treated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) and the prognostic significance of common adverse reactions.

Patients and Methods

A total of 79 elderly patients (≥60 years) with ES-SCLC who failed after at least two lines of previous systemic therapy were included. Baseline characteristics of the patients were collected. Follow-up was conducted regularly. Adverse reactions were documented. Survival curves were drawn using Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate analysis was assessed using log rank test, and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis. Additionally, the prognostic significance of common adverse reactions was performed.

Results

All of the 79 patients were available for evaluation of efficacy. Partial response (PR) was observed in 7 patients, stable disease (SD) was noted in 48 patients and progressive disease (PD) was confirmed in 24 patients. Consequently, the objective response rate (ORR) was 8.9% and disease control rate (DCR) was 69.6%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 79 elderly patients with ES-SCLC was 3.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.02–3.98]. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.07–9.13). Safety profile demonstrated that the relatively common adverse reactions of the elderly patients with ES-SCLC receiving anlotinib treatment were hypertension (40.5%), hand-foot syndrome (HFS, 31.6%), diarrhea (27.8%), decreased appetite (20.3%), fatigue (17.7%) and weight loss (17.7%). Interestingly, the prognostic significance of common adverse reactions indicated that the median PFS of patients with hypertension and without hypertension was 4.35 and 2.95 months, respectively (P=0.01), and the median PFS of patients with HFS and without HFS was 4.20 and 2.95 months, respectively (P=0.03).

Conclusion

The preliminary efficacy and safety of anlotinib in the treatment for elderly patients with previously treated ES-SCLC was satisfactory, and patients with hypertension and hand-foot syndrome might confer superior prognosis.