Clinical Insight on Semaglutide for Chronic Weight Management in Adults: Patient Selection and Special Considerations

Emerging role of GLP-1 agonists in cardio-metabolic therapy - Focus on Semaglutide

Semaglutide, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising agent in cardiovascular disease management, particularly for patients with obesity and diabetes. Recent studies have demonstrated significant benefits of Semaglutide beyond glycemic control, including reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), improvements in heart failure symptoms, and weight reduction. Notably, the STEP-HFpEF trial highlighted improved exercise capacity and a reduction in NT-proBNP levels, offering a novel therapeutic pathway for heart failure management. Additionally, Semaglutide has shown anti-inflammatory effects, reducing C-reactive protein (CRP) and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), thereby mitigating atherosclerotic risks. Moreover, the SELECT trial demonstrated Semaglutide's cardiovascular benefits in non-diabetic, obese patients, suggesting that its effects extend beyond weight loss. These findings represent a potential paradigm shift in cardiovascular risk management, although access and affordability remain key challenges.

Role of Incretin Mimetics in Cardiovascular Outcomes and Other Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors beyond Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus in Nondiabetic Adults with Obesity: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

Emerging data on cardiovascular outcomes, specifically major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), are being reported from various trials involving incretin mimetics, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), especially among patients with obesity and diabetes. Our aim was to evaluate this matter, while also involving various traditional cardiovascular risk factors [e.g., several body weight (BW) parameters, blood pressure (BP), lipid profile].

METHODS

A search of PubMed, Europe PMC, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to September 2024 was performed to identify GLP-1 RA and GIP trials in MACE risk reduction as a primary endpoint. Our secondary endpoints included a reduction in BW, waist circumference (WC), body mass index (BMI), BP changes, and lipid modifying effects, while also yielding safety concerns surrounding the use of these pharmaceutical agents. Mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) were summarized using random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 11 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 8 GLP-1 RA trials and 3 dual GLP-1 RA/GIP (tirzepatide) trials were included. Compared with control groups, GLP-1 RA significantly reduced the MACE risk by 32% [RR 0.68 (95% CI 0.53-0.87); P = 0.002; I2 = 73%, P-heterogeneity < 0.001] and 59% for tirzepatide [RR 0.41 (95% CI 0.18-0.92); P = 0.03; I2 = 0%, P-heterogeneity = 0.96]. Incretin mimetics also substantially reduced BW, BP, and improved lipid panel measures. However, there was an increased risk of adverse events, specifically gastrointestinal disorders within the incretin mimetics subset.

CONCLUSIONS

Incretin mimetics have shown promise in reducing MACE risk while also enhancing cardiovascular risk factors, including blood pressure and lipid profile, in adults with obesity without diabetes.

Achieving Over 30% Body Weight Loss With Semaglutide in a Patient: A Case Report

A 69-year-old female with morbid obesity (BMI: 47) and hypertension achieved significant weight loss following treatment with semaglutide. Starting at 241 lb, she lost 90 lb (over 30% of her body weight) over 65 weeks without side effects. This weight loss exceeded the average reduction reported in previous studies. Additionally, her hypertension resolved, and her glucose levels normalized, illustrating the multifaceted benefits of semaglutide in weight management.

Emerging pharmacotherapies for obesity: A systematic review

The history of antiobesity pharmacotherapies is marked by disappointments, often entangled with societal pressure promoting weight loss and the prevailing conviction that excess body weight signifies a lack of willpower. However, categories of emerging pharmacotherapies generate hope to reduce obesity rates. This systematic review of phase 2 and phase 3 trials in adults with overweight/obesity investigates the effect of novel weight loss pharmacotherapies, compared to placebo/control or US Food and Drug Administration-approved weight loss medication, through searching Medline, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (2012-2024). We identified 53 phase 3 and phase 2 trials, with 36 emerging antiobesity drugs or combinations thereof and 4 withdrawn or terminated trials. Oral semaglutide 50 mg is the only medication that has completed a phase 3 trial. There are 14 ongoing phase 3 trials on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) (ecnoglutide, orforglipron, and TG103), GLP-1 RA/amylin agonist (CagriSema), GLP-1/glucagon RAs (mazdutide and survodutide), GLP-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon RA (retatrutide), dapagliflozin, and the combination sibutramine/topiramate. Completed phase 2 trials on incretin-based therapies showed a mean percent weight loss of 7.4% to 24.2%. Almost half of the drugs undergoing phase 2 trials are incretin analogs. The obesity drug pipeline is expanding rapidly, with the most promising results reported with incretin analogs. Data on mortality and obesity-related complications, such as cardio-renal-metabolic events, are needed. Moreover, long-term follow-up data on the safety and efficacy of weight maintenance with novel obesity pharmacotherapies, along with studies focused on underrepresented populations, cost-effectiveness assessments, and drug availability, are needed to bridge the care gap for patients with obesity. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Obesity is the epidemic of the 21st century. Except for the newer injectable medications, drugs with suboptimal efficacy have been available in the clinician's armamentarium for weight management. However, emerging alternatives of novel agents and combinations populate the current obesity therapeutic pipeline. This systematic review identifies the state and mechanism of action of emerging pharmacotherapies undergoing or having completed phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials. The information provided herein furthers the understanding of obesity management, implying direct clinical implications and stimulating research initiatives.

Charting New Territories in Obesity Management- Traditional Techniques to Tirzepatide

BACKGROUND

Obesity, a pervasive global health challenge affecting more than 2 billion people, requires comprehensive interventions. Traditional approaches, including lifestyle modification, and diverse drugs targeting a gastrointestinal hormone, including glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 (Liraglutide, Semaglutide, Exenatide, Albiglutide, Dulaglutide, Lixisenatide, Orlistat, Phentermine/Topiramate, Lorcaserin, Sibutramine, and Rimonabant) offer tailored strategies; yet their effectiveness is limited and some drugs were taken off the market. Moreover, various surgical modalities, such as Roux-en-Y Bypass surgery, sleeve gastrectomy, intragastric balloons, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and vagal nerve blockade can be considered but are associated with numerous side effects and require careful monitoring. Consequently, there is a pressing need for novel anti-obesity treatments.

METHODS

This comprehensive review was based on the available data to discuss the traditional pharmaceutical and surgical therapeutical strategies for obesity, going further to discuss tirzepatide's mode of action, its outcomes for obesity, and the associated side effects.

RESULTS

In this landscape, tirzepatide, initially designed for type 2 diabetes management, emerges as a potential game-changer. Functioning as a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, it not only addresses control but also introduces a fresh perspective on weight reduction. This review intricately explores tirzepatide's mechanism, dissecting insights from clinical studies and positioning it as a major force in obesity treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In the middle of significant shifts in obesity management, tirzepatide presents itself as a promising and cost-effective intervention. Its Food and Drug Administration approval marks a milestone in the realm of obesity therapeutics. Going beyond a recapitulation of findings, the conclusion emphasizes the imperative for ongoing exploration and vigilant safety monitoring in tirzepatide's application.

Effect of Silibinin on Human Pancreatic Lipase Inhibition and Gut Microbiota in Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Thistle (Onopordum acanthium) has been traditionally employed for liver protection. However, we recently identified silibinin, the main bioactive compound of thistle extract, as an in vitro pancreatic lipase inhibitor, which suggested a potential role as an anti-obesity agent. This study aimed to assess, in vivo, the efficacy, safety, and effects of silibinin on human lipase. As a secondary objective, we evaluated potential changes in gut microbiota after silibinin treatment. A randomized trial comparing 150 mg/silibinin, 300 mg/silibinin, and a thistle extract (equivalent to 150 mg/silibinin) with placebo and orlistat/120 mg was conducted. Fecal fat excretion, clinical parameters, and microbiota changes were analyzed. Orlistat showed the highest fecal fat excretion, although thistle extract had similar results (p = 0.582). The 150 mg/silibinin group reported the fewest adverse effects. Both silibinin and orlistat reduced plasma triglycerides (p = 0.016) and waist circumference (p = 0.001). Specific microbiota changes, such as increases in Mycobacteriaceae and Veillonellaceae, were associated with higher fat excretion. Although the present work was conducted in the short term and in people of normal weight, our results suggest that silibinin may be safe and effective for obesity, with minimal adverse effects and no significant changes in microbiota diversity. Further studies are needed to explore its microbiota-related benefits.

Semaglutide use in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes from real-world utilization data: An analysis of the All of US Program

AIM

To analyse data from the All of Us Research Program to evaluate the real-world application and long-term effectiveness of semaglutide in treating type 2 diabetes and obesity patients in a large population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified patients prescribed semaglutide and analysed differences in route of administration and the time on semaglutide. For individuals diagnosed with obesity, we measured changes in body mass index (BMI) and weight from baseline, while measured changes in HbA1c for those patients with type 2 diabetes. We also examined the occurrence of newly diagnosed common adverse events from taking semaglutide.

RESULTS

For 3739 semaglutide patients, those on injectable semaglutide (3364 patients) averaged 301.54 days on the medication, with 20.36% having no end date, while those on oral semaglutide (435 patients) averaged 172.48 days, with 24.60% having no end date. We found average decreases of 1.54 kg/m2 in BMI, 4.65 kg in weight and 0.75% in HbA1c for semaglutide users. The decreases were larger in participants taking injectable formulation, probably because of higher starting values. Over time, improvements in these outcomes diminished, but the values remained significantly lower than baseline levels. Approximately only 1.0% of patients reported newly diagnosed common adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Consistent with clinical trial findings, this real-world data analysis showed that semaglutide was well tolerated and that, for a large population, it effectively reduced BMI, body weight and HbA1c, albeit to smaller magnitudes than observed in clinical trials. These findings provide valuable insights into real-world experience and the long-term effectiveness of semaglutide.

A phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide in healthy Chinese subjects

AIM

The trial (NCT04016974) investigated the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide, the first orally administered glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes, in healthy Chinese subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-centre, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled trial randomized 32 healthy Chinese adults to once-daily oral semaglutide (3 mg escalating to 14 mg) or placebo for 12 weeks. Blood samples were collected regularly during treatment and follow-up. The primary endpoint was the area under the semaglutide concentration-time curve over a dosing interval (0-24 h) at steady state (AUC0-24h,sema,SS). Secondary pharmacokinetic endpoints included the maximum observed semaglutide plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,sema,SS). Supportive secondary pharmacodynamics endpoints included changes in body weight and fasting plasma glucose.

RESULTS

Treatment with all oral semaglutide doses showed dose-dependent increases in semaglutide exposure in healthy Chinese subjects at steady state, determined by AUC0-24h,sema,SS (233, 552 and 1288 h·nmol/L for 3, 7 and 14 mg of oral semaglutide, respectively) and Cmax,sema,SS. Oral semaglutide treatment was associated with significant reductions in body weight (p = .0001) and fasting plasma glucose (p = .0011) versus placebo at the end of treatment. The safety and tolerability of oral semaglutide were consistent with the known profile of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, with no severe or blood-glucose-confirmed symptomatic hypoglycaemic events, serious adverse events or deaths. The most frequent adverse events were gastrointestinal disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

At steady state, oral semaglutide exposure was dose dependent and close to dose proportionality in healthy Chinese subjects. This is consistent with previous clinical pharmacology results for oral semaglutide.

Effect of Semaglutide in Individuals With Obesity or Overweight Without Diabetes

This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in individuals with obesity or overweight without diabetes. Obesity is a significant public health concern, associated with various comorbidities and reduced quality of life. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has emerged as a promising pharmacological intervention for weight management. This review synthesizes findings from multiple clinical trials, highlighting the impact of semaglutide on weight loss, metabolic parameters, and overall health outcomes in non-diabetic populations. The review also addresses methodological considerations, including study design, participant selection, and outcome measures, to assess the robustness of the evidence. Ethical considerations and potential conflicts of interest are discussed to ensure transparency in the research process. The findings indicate that semaglutide is associated with significant weight reduction and improvement in obesity-related health markers, suggesting its potential as a valuable treatment option for individuals struggling with obesity. Limitations of the current literature and recommendations for future research directions are also presented, emphasizing the need for further studies to explore the long-term effects and generalizability of semaglutide treatment in diverse populations.

SPAG7 deletion causes intrauterine growth restriction, resulting in adulthood obesity and metabolic dysfunction

From a forward mutagenetic screen to discover mutations associated with obesity, we identified mutations in the Spag7 gene linked to metabolic dysfunction in mice. Here, we show that SPAG7 KO mice are born smaller and develop obesity and glucose intolerance in adulthood. This obesity does not stem from hyperphagia, but a decrease in energy expenditure. The KO animals also display reduced exercise tolerance and muscle function due to impaired mitochondrial function. Furthermore, SPAG7-deficiency in developing embryos leads to intrauterine growth restriction, brought on by placental insufficiency, likely due to abnormal development of the placental junctional zone. This insufficiency leads to loss of SPAG7-deficient fetuses in utero and reduced birth weights of those that survive. We hypothesize that a 'thrifty phenotype' is ingrained in SPAG7 KO animals during development that leads to adult obesity. Collectively, these results indicate that SPAG7 is essential for embryonic development and energy homeostasis later in life.

Advantages and Limitations of the Body Mass Index (BMI) to Assess Adult Obesity

Obesity reflects excessive fat deposits. At-risk individuals are guided by healthcare professionals to eat fewer calories and exercise more, often using body mass index (BMI; weight/height2) thresholds for screening and to guide progress and prognosis. By conducting a mini-narrative review of original articles, websites, editorials, commentaries, and guidelines, we sought to place BMI in the context of its appropriate use in population health, clinical screening, and monitoring in clinical care. The review covers studies and publications through 2023, encompassing consensus reviews and relevant literature. Recent consensus reviews suggest that BMI is a valuable tool for population surveys and primary healthcare screening but has limitations in predicting the risk of chronic diseases and assessing excess fat. BMI can guide nutritional and exercise counseling, even if it is inadequate for reliable individual risk prediction. BMI cut-offs must be reconsidered in populations of varying body build, age, and/or ethnicity. Since BMI-diagnosed overweight persons are sometimes physically and physiologically fit by other indicators, persons who are overweight on BMI should be more fully evaluated, diagnosed, and monitored with combined anthropometric and performance metrics to better clarify risks. The use of combined anthropometric and performance metrics involves integrating measurements of body composition with assessments of physical function and fitness to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of an individual's health and fitness status. Eligibility for bariatric surgery or semaglutide satiety/appetite-reduction medications should not be determined by BMI alone. Awareness of the advantages and limitations of using BMI as a tool to assess adult obesity can maximize its appropriate use in the context of population health and in rapid clinical screening and evaluation.

Cardiovascular Implications of Semaglutide in Obesity Management: Redefining Cardiovascular Health Strategies

Semaglutide is a glucagon-l ike peptide 1 receptor agonist that has been noted to have a significant role in the reduction of body weight and glycaemic control. An increasing body of evidence from recent trials (SUSTAIN-6, SELECT and STEP HF) has shown significant cardiovascular benefits of semaglutide in both patients with and without diabetes and in people who are obese or overweight. Additional studies in a more diverse patient population and safety assessment are warranted prior to adding semaglutide to the increasing pool of guideline-directed medical therapy for the treatment and prevention of cardiac diseases.

Molecular mechanisms of semaglutide and liraglutide as a therapeutic option for obesity

Obesity, a chronic global health problem, is associated with an increase in various comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and certain types of cancer. The increasing global prevalence of obesity requires research into new therapeutic strategies. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, specifically semaglutide and liraglutide, designed for type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment, have been explored as drugs for the treatment of obesity. This minireview describes the molecular mechanisms of semaglutide and liraglutide in different metabolic pathways, and its mechanism of action in processes such as appetite regulation, insulin secretion, glucose homeostasis, energy expenditure, and lipid metabolism. Finally, several clinical trial outcomes are described to show the safety and efficacy of these drugs in obesity management.

Assessment of Thyroid Carcinogenic Risk and Safety Profile of GLP1-RA Semaglutide (Ozempic) Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review

The broadening application of glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 receptor agonists, specifically semaglutide (Ozempic) for the management of diabetes and obesity brings a critical need to evaluate its safety profile, considering estimates of up to 20 million prescriptions per year in the US until 2035. This systematic review aims to assess the incidence of thyroid cancer and detail the spectrum of adverse events associated with semaglutide, focusing on its implications for patient care. Through a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase databases up to December 2023, ten randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 14,550 participants, with 7830 receiving semaglutide, were analyzed, with an additional number of 18 studies that were separately discussed because they reported data from the same RCTs. The review focused on thyroid cancer incidence, gastrointestinal symptoms, and other significant adverse events attributed to semaglutide. The incidence of thyroid cancer in semaglutide-treated patients was less than 1%, suggesting no significant risk. Adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal, including nausea (2.05% to 19.95%) and diarrhea (1.4% to 13%). Nasopharyngitis and vomiting were also notable, with mean prevalences of 8.23% and 5.97%, respectively. Other adverse events included increased lipase levels (mean of 6.5%), headaches (mean prevalence of 7.92%), decreased appetite (reported consistently at 7%), influenza symptoms (mean prevalence of 5.23%), dyspepsia (mean prevalence of 5.18%), and constipation (mean prevalence of 6.91%). Serious adverse events varied from 7% to 25.2%, highlighting the need for vigilant patient monitoring. These findings underscore the gastrointestinal nature of semaglutide's adverse events, which, while prevalent, did not significantly deter from its clinical benefits in the treatment landscape. This systematic review provides a comprehensive assessment of semaglutide's safety profile, with a focus on gastrointestinal adverse events and a low incidence of thyroid cancer. Despite the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms, semaglutide remains an efficacious option for managing diabetes and obesity. The detailed characterization of adverse events underscores the importance of monitoring and managing these effects in clinical practice, excluding the hypothesis of carcinogenesis.

Semaglutide-induced Hyperemesis Gravidarum

Long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have traditionally been used for glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus. More recently, the medical community in the United States has used its most common side effect, weight loss, as an adjunct therapy for weight management in certain populations. Little is known about the effects of semaglutide in pregnancy. But in nonpregnant people, nausea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and abdominal cramping are common side effects. Here we present the first reported case of hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) induced by semaglutide. Our patient presented at 7 weeks' gestational age with 4 days of extreme nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramping, and anorexia, symptoms that she did not experience in prior pregnancies. The patient was treated with little symptomatic improvement during her hospitalization. She later informed the medical team of her use of a high dose of subcutaneous semaglutide (2 mg) the day of symptom onset before discovering her pregnancy; semaglutide was obtained online without clinicians' guidance. Her symptoms resolved 6 days after taking semaglutide, which closely coincides with semaglutide's half-life. This leads us to believe that semaglutide exaggerated the physiological nausea and vomiting of pregnancy causing HG.

Giving weight to incretin-based pharmacotherapy for obesity-related sleep apnea: a revolution or a pipe dream?

Obesity is a chronic disease affecting over 670 million adults globally, with multiple complications including obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Substantial weight loss in patients with obesity-related OSA can reduce or even eliminate OSA as well as reduce sleepiness and improve cardio-metabolic health. Evidence suggests that these improvements exceed those that occur with device-based OSA therapies like continuous positive airway pressure which continue to be the first-line of therapy. Resistance to weight management as a first-line strategy to combat OSA could arise from the complexities in delivering and maintaining adequate weight management, particularly in sleep clinic settings. Recently, incretin-based pharmacotherapies including glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists alone or combined with glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists have been developed to target glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. These medications also slow gastric emptying and reduce energy intake. In randomized, placebo-controlled trials of these medications in diabetic and non-diabetic populations with obesity, participants on active medication lost up to 20% of their body weight, with corresponding improvements in blood pressure, lipid levels, physical functioning, and fat mass loss. Their adverse effects are predominantly gastrointestinal-related, mild, and transient. There are trials currently underway within individuals with obesity-related OSA, with a focus on reduction in weight, OSA severity, and cardio-metabolic outcomes. These medications have the potential to substantially disrupt the management of OSA. Pending coming data, we will need to consider pharmacological weight loss as a first-line therapy and how that influences training and management guidelines.

Clinician resistance to broaching the topic of weight in primary care: Digging deeper into weight management using strong structuration theory

Clinical trials have shown that providing advice and support for people with excess weight can lead to meaningful weight loss. Despite this evidence and guidelines endorsing this approach, provision in real-world clinical settings remains low. We used Strong Structuration Theory (SST) to understand why people are often not offered weight management advice in primary care in England. Data from policy, clinical practice and focus groups were analysed using SST to consider how the interplay between weight stigma and structures of professional responsibilities influenced clinicians to raise (or not) the issue of excess weight with patients. We found that general practitioners (GPs) often accounted for their actions by referring to obesity as a health problem, consistent with policy documents and clinical guidelines. However, they were also aware of weight stigma as a social process that can be internalised by their patients. GPs identified addressing obesity as a priority in their work, but described wanting to care for their patients by avoiding unnecessary suffering, which they were concerned could be caused by talking about weight. We observed tensions between knowledge of clinical guidelines and understanding of the lived experience of their patients. We interpreted that the practice of 'caring by not offering care' produced the outcome of an absence of weight management advice in consultations. There is a risk that this outcome reinforces the external structure of weight stigma as a delicate topic to be avoided, while at the same time denying patients the offer of support to manage their weight.

The Neurobiology of Eating Behavior in Obesity: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets: A Report from the 23rd Annual Harvard Nutrition Obesity Symposium

Obesity is increasing at an alarming rate. The effectiveness of currently available strategies for the treatment of obesity (including pharmacologic, surgical, and behavioral interventions) is limited. Understanding the neurobiology of appetite and the important drivers of energy intake (EI) can lead to the development of more effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity. Appetite regulation is complex and is influenced by genetic, social, and environmental factors. It is intricately regulated by a complex interplay of endocrine, gastrointestinal, and neural systems. Hormonal and neural signals generated in response to the energy state of the organism and the quality of food eaten are communicated by paracrine, endocrine, and gastrointestinal signals to the nervous system. The central nervous system integrates homeostatic and hedonic signals to regulate appetite. Although there has been an enormous amount of research over many decades regarding the regulation of EI and body weight, research is only now yielding potentially effective treatment strategies for obesity. The purpose of this article is to summarize the key findings presented in June 2022 at the 23rd annual Harvard Nutrition Obesity Symposium entitled "The Neurobiology of Eating Behavior in Obesity: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets." Findings presented at the symposium, sponsored by NIH P30 Nutrition Obesity Research Center at Harvard, enhance our current understanding of appetite biology, including innovative techniques used to assess and systematically manipulate critical hedonic processes, which will shape future research and the development of therapeutics for obesity prevention and treatment.

Treatment sequencing using the dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist KBP-336 and semaglutide results in durable weight loss

OBJECTIVE

Long-acting dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonists (DACRAs) hold great promise as potential treatments for obesity and its associated comorbidities. These agents have demonstrated beneficial effects on body weight, glucose control, and insulin action mirroring the effects observed with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist treatment. Strategies aimed at enhancing and prolonging treatment efficacy include treatment sequencing and combination therapy. Here, we sought to investigate the impact of switching between or combining treatment with the DACRA KBP-336 and the GLP-1 analog semaglutide in fed rats with obesity induced by a high-fat diet (HFD).

METHODS

Two studies were performed in which HFD-induced obese Sprague Dawley rats were switched between treatment with KBP-336 (4.5 nmol/kg, Q3D) and semaglutide (50 nmol/kg, Q3D) or a combination of the two. Treatment efficacy on weight loss and food intake was evaluated, and glucose tolerance was assessed by oral glucose tolerance tests.

RESULTS

KBP-336 and semaglutide monotherapy resulted in a similar reduction in body weight and food intake. Treatment sequencing resulted in continuous weight loss and all monotherapies resulted in similar weight loss independent of the treatment regimen (P < 0.001 compared to vehicle). The combination of KBP-336 and semaglutide significantly improved the weight loss compared to either monotherapy alone (P < 0.001), which was evident in the adiposity at the study end. All treatments improved glucose tolerance, with the KBP-effect on insulin sensitivity as the dominant response.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight KBP-336 as a promising anti-obesity therapy both alone, in treatment sequencing, and in combination with semaglutide or other incretin-based therapies.