Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Patients with Severe Asthma: An Examination of Exacerbations and Costs

Real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in patients with asthma: Findings from the US ADVANTAGE study

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is approved as an add-on maintenance therapy for patients (≥6 years) with moderate-to-severe asthma. Better understanding of real-world effectiveness is needed.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the real-world effectiveness of dupilumab in asthma management.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients (≥12 years of age) diagnosed with asthma, initiating dupilumab between November 2018 and September 2020. The study used a US electronic medical record database (TriNetX Dataworks, Cambridge, Massachusetts). Asthma exacerbation rates before and after the initiation of dupilumab were analyzed using generalized estimating equations models with Poisson probabilistic link to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Sensitivity analyses were conducted based on previous exacerbation data, eosinophil levels, history of atopic dermatitis or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, previous use of biologics, and presence of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19).

RESULTS

A total of 2400 patients initiating dupilumab met all study criteria. After initiation of dupilumab, risk of asthma exacerbation was reduced by 44% (IRR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.47-0.57; P = <0.0001) and systemic corticosteroid prescriptions by 48% (IRR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48, 0.56; P = <0.0001) compared with those before initiation of dupilumab. Adjustment for COVID-19 showed a greater reduction in asthma exacerbations (IRR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.45-0.55; P = <0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Current real-world efficacy evidence indicates that dupilumab reduces asthma exacerbations and total systemic corticosteroid prescriptions in clinical practice. The effectiveness of dupilumab was observed independent of exacerbation history, eosinophil levels, or COVID-19 impact.

Cost-effectiveness and resource use analysis of patients with asthma before and after treatment with mepolizumab in a real-life setting

OBJECTIVE

To define the cost-effectiveness and health resource use of mepolizumab in a cohort of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in real-life conditions in Spain.

METHODS

This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. Patients included were diagnosed with severe eosinophilic asthma and treated with mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneous (SC) 4-weekly for 12 months. Outcomes evaluated: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), number of exacerbations, disease control with the Asthma Control Test (ACT), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), and direct and indirect cost per patient.

RESULTS

12 months after mepolizumab initiation, a significant decrease in exacerbations was shown, from a mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 3.1 (2.6) to 0.7 (1.5), an increase from 4.9 (0.4) to 6.1 (0.5) in AQLQ, and from 14.9 (5.7) to 21.5 (3.9) in ACT scores. The number of cortico-dependent patients significantly decreased from 53.3% to 13.3% during this period. There was a significant decrease of 94% in the cost of hospitalization, from a mean (SD) of €4063.9 (5423.9) pretreatment to €238.6 (1306.9) post-treatment (p = 0.0003). Total costs decreased significantly from a median of €2,423.1 (1,512.8; 9,320.9) pretreatment to €1,177.5 (965.0; 1,737.8) post-treatment if mepolizumab was excluded. ICER per exacerbation avoided was €3606.9, per 3-point ACT score increase €3934.8, and per 0.5-point AQLQ score increase €3606.9.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab improves control of asthma and quality of life in patients with severe diseases in a cost-effectiveness range. The number of exacerbations decreased, and there was a clear reduction in primary care visits and hospitalizations. Further economic analyses of biological therapies for asthma are required.

Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab in the Management of Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Systematic Review

Severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) is characterized by persistent airway inflammation and frequent exacerbations despite standard treatments. Mepolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that reduces eosinophil levels by targeting interleukin-5, has emerged as an add-on therapy for patients with SEA. This systematic review evaluated mepolizumab's efficacy and safety for treating SEA. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across major databases. Thirty-two studies with over 6,000 patients were included, comprising randomized controlled trials, open-label extensions, and real-world observational analyses. Study quality and risk of bias were assessed using standard tools. Meta-analysis was deemed inappropriate due to heterogeneity. Instead, a narrative synthesis was performed. Mepolizumab significantly reduced exacerbation rates by around 50% and improved symptoms and lung function compared to placebo in pivotal trials. Long-term open-label studies showed sustained reductions in exacerbations and stable lung function for up to 4.5 years. Real-world data demonstrated consistent 50%-90% exacerbation decreases across diverse patient populations over 6-24 months. Mepolizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile, with mild injection site reactions and headaches as most common adverse events. While specific subgroups may show enhanced responses, mepolizumab displayed broad efficacy regardless of patient demographics or phenotypes. The extensive evidence provides robust support for mepolizumab as an efficacious and safe add-on treatment option for patients with severe, refractory eosinophilic asthma. Further high-quality comparative effectiveness research is warranted to optimize patient selection and positioning among emerging biologics.

Mepolizumab in Patients With Severe Asthma and Comorbidities: 1-Year REALITI-A Analysis

BACKGROUND

Severe asthma is complex; comorbidities may influence disease outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess mepolizumab effectiveness in patients with severe asthma and comorbidities.

METHODS

REALITI-A was a 2-year international, prospective study enrolling adults with asthma newly prescribed mepolizumab (100 mg subcutaneously) at physician's discretion. This post hoc analysis assessed 1-year outcomes stratified by comorbidities at enrollment: chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), depression/anxiety, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Outcomes included the rate of clinically significant asthma exacerbations (CSEs; requiring systemic corticosteroids and/or hospital/emergency room admission) between the 12 months pre- and post-mepolizumab treatment and changes from baseline in daily maintenance oral corticosteroid dose (mo 12), Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score (mo 12) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; mo 9-12).

RESULTS

At enrollment (n = 822), 321 of 822 (39%), 309 of 801 (39%), 203 of 785 (26%), and 81 of 808 (10%) patients had comorbid CRSwNP, GERD, depression/anxiety, and COPD, respectively. Post- versus pre-treatment across all comorbidity subgroups: the rate of CSEs decreased by 63% or more; among 298 (39%) patients on maintenance oral corticosteroids at baseline, median dose decreased by 50% or more; Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 score decreased by 0.63 or more points; FEV1 increased by 74 mL or more. Patients with versus without CRSwNP had the greatest improvements (eg, rate of CSEs decreased by 75%). Patients without GERD, depression/anxiety, or COPD had greater improvements than those with the respective comorbidities, except for FEV1 in patients with COPD.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab improved disease outcomes in patients with severe asthma irrespective of comorbidities, with additional benefit for patients with CRSwNP.

The association of varying treatment thresholds of mepolizumab on asthma exacerbations in adults

Background: Asthma has a high healthcare burden globally, with up to 10% of the asthma population suffering from severe disease. Biologic agents are a newer class of asthma treatments for severe asthma, with good evidence for efficacy in clinical trials. Nevertheless, real-world studies of its impact on clinical outcomes are limited.Methods: This is an observational cohort study using administrative claims data. The study population consisted of patients aged ≥18 years who had a diagnosis of asthma and initiated mepolizumab after November 4, 2015 and had continuous medical and drug coverage in both the 365 days prior to and following mepolizumab initiation. In patients treated with mepolizumab, we described clinically significant asthma exacerbations by minimum continuous treatment thresholds following initiation of mepolizumab, medication switching patterns and chronic oral corticosteroid (≥28 days) use.Results: We identified 2,536 adults with asthma who initiated mepolizumab. There was an association toward reduction in severe asthma-related events over the first one year of exposure. We observed associations with reduced dispensings of oral corticosteroids over the first year after mepolizumab initiation. Very few patients switched to other biologics during the study period.Conclusions: Treatment with mepolizumab may be associated with fewer asthma-related events in the first year. Over the first one year after initiating mepolizumab, we found associations with decreased concomitant dispensings of oral corticosteroids and medium to high dose ICS/LABA. Additionally, most patients who initiated mepolizumab did not switch to other biologics.

Development and characterization of anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody Fab fragment for blocking IL-5/IL-5Rα binding

Interleukin-5 (IL-5) is a homodimeric cytokine that is a crucial regulator of the proliferation, activation, and maturation of eosinophils. Anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies, which block the binding of IL-5 to the IL-5 receptor subunit alpha (IL-5Rα), have been successfully used to treat eosinophilic (EOS) asthma. The currently marketed monoclonal antibody drugs require repeated injections for administration, which seriously affect patient compliance and high systemic exposure for injectable drug delivery. Here we successfully screened and developed the Fab (fragment of antigen binding), which is 1/3rd the molecular weight of IgG, favoring inhalation-mediated delivery to the lungs, making it more effective for asthma treatment. The 20A12-Fab-H12L3 can bind to IL-5 with a binding constant of 1.236E-09 M while significantly inhibiting the IL-5/IL-5Rα complex formation. We found that the light chain amino acids (S46 and F71) significantly affected the antibody expression during humanization. The 20A12-Fab-H12L3 significantly inhibited the proliferation of TF-1 cells and blocked the IL-5 binding to the IL-5Rα-overexpressing human embryonic kidney (HEK)-293 cells in vitro. Therefore, based on the mutant IL-5 binding with Fab, we explained why antibodies blocked IL-5 binding to IL-5Rα. Thus, this study provided a candidate pharmaceutical antibody for inhalation drug delivery.

A cost comparison of benralizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in patients with severe asthma: A US third-party payer perspective

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials and real-world evidence (RWE) studies of biologics have demonstrated reduced exacerbations, decreased use of oral corticosteroids (OCS), and improvements in daily symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). OBJECTIVE: To compare direct health care costs associated with biologic use for the treatment of SEA from a US third-party payer perspective. METHODS: We developed a cost-minimization model to compare costs and cost offsets associated with 3 biologics-benralizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab-for 2- and 4-year periods. The model relied on longitudinal data from clinical trials to inform the primary (base case) analysis cost comparison and RWE study data, in a separate scenario, to compare costs in nonclinical trial settings. Primary model outcomes included exacerbations (including hospitalizations), OCS-dependent years (including associated complications), and total direct health care biologic costs. Results were calculated at the per patient and population level (per 1,000 patients). Sensitivity analyses with key model parameters were performed. RESULTS: Benralizumab had the lowest total biologic costs per patient for both the 2- and 4-year periods. Over 4 years, the marginal cost difference in total biologic costs per patient was $23,061 lower for benralizumab vs mepolizumab and $17,242 lower for benralizumab vs dupilumab. The 4-year population level analysis of benralizumab vs mepolizumab revealed $4.8 million in marginal cost offsets due to 582 fewer exacerbations and 153 fewer OCS-dependent years and a marginal total cost savings of $27.9 million per 1,000 patients for benralizumab. The 4-year population level analysis of benralizumab vs dupilumab revealed $2.3 million in marginal cost offsets due to 291 fewer exacerbations and 64 fewer OCS-dependent years and marginal total cost savings of $19.5 million per 1,000 patients for benralizumab. RWE data were available for a 2-year cost comparison scenario of benralizumab vs mepolizumab, which showed similar results to the base case analysis. Sensitivity analyses varying assumptions on key model parameter estimates confirmed results, with benralizumab having lower total direct health care costs in all scenarios tested, and showed that model results were most sensitive to changes in biologic costs and exacerbation reduction rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving benralizumab had higher nonbiologic cost offsets because of reductions in exacerbations and OCS-dependent years, leading to greater cost savings for third-party payers compared with patients receiving mepolizumab or dupilumab. Taken together with biologic costs, benralizumab presents greater savings in health care costs for payers than patients with SEA who use mepolizumab or dupilumab. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by AstraZeneca (Cambridge, UK). Drs Xu, Chung, Genofre, and Katial are or were AstraZeneca employees at the time this research was conducted and may be shareholders of AstraZeneca. Ms Schaefer and Dr Szende are employees of Labcorp Drug Development, which received funding from AstraZeneca to perform this research.

Economic evaluation of biological treatments in patients with severe asthma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a highly prevalent disease, one of the chronic diseases with the highest economic costs; thus, it imposes a high economic burden on society, the healthcare system, patients, and third-party payers. Contrary to this study, until now, systematic reviews of economic evaluations (EEs) of treatments for severe asthma have not been exclusively focused on biological treatments, and have included a small number of studies and only model-based EEs.

METHODS

This study systematically reviews EEs of biological therapies for severe asthma published until December 2022 using PRISMA guidelines. The review analyzes the cost-effectiveness of biologicals in comparison to SOC, or SOC plus OCS. The quality of the EEs is assessed using Consensus on Health Economics Checklist extended (CHEC-extended).

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were eligible: 15 based on a Markov model, and 19 trial-based; eight adopting societal and NHS perspectives, and seven the payer's perspective. The reviewed EEs addressed cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, and incremental costs and outcomes comparison. Their findings were mainly expressed through ICER-incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (24 studies: 13 concluded that biological were cost-effective) and cost comparison analysis (14 studies: 6 concluded that biological were cost-effective), and were sensitive to a wide variety of factors (e.g. medication cost, treatment response, time horizon, utility benefits, mortality, exacerbation rate, discount rate, etc.).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been some ambiguity concerning the EE of biological therapies due to variation in choice of study design and contradictory results. Nevertheless, it can be concluded that biological treatments improve health outcomes, in many contexts at a high cost.

Impact of mepolizumab in patients with high-burden severe asthma within a managed care population

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the real-world impact of mepolizumab on the incidence of asthma exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and asthma exacerbation-related costs in patients with high-burden severe asthma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases in patients with high-burden severe asthma (≥80th percentile of total healthcare expenditure and/or significant comorbidity burden). Patients were ≥12 years of age upon mepolizumab initiation (index date November 1, 2015-December 31, 2018) and had ≥2 mepolizumab administrations during the 6 months post-index. Asthma exacerbation frequency (primary outcome), use of OCS (secondary outcome), and asthma exacerbation-related costs (exploratory outcome) were assessed during the 12 months pre-index (baseline) and post-index (follow-up).

RESULTS

In total, 281 patients were analyzed. Mepolizumab significantly reduced the proportion of patients with any asthma exacerbation (P < 0.001) or exacerbations requiring hospitalization (P = 0.004) in the follow-up versus baseline period. The mean number of exacerbations decreased from 2.5 to 1.5 events/patient/year (relative reduction: 40.0%; P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with ≥1 OCS claim also decreased significantly from 94.0% to 81.9% (relative reduction: 12.9%; P < 0.001), corresponding to a decrease from 6.6 to 4.7 claims/person/year (P < 0.001). Of the 264 patients with ≥1 OCS claim during baseline, 191 (72.3%) showed a decrease in mean daily OCS use by ≥50% in 117 patients (61.3%). Total asthma exacerbation-related costs were significantly lower after mepolizumab was initiated (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab reduced exacerbation frequency, OCS use and asthma exacerbation-related costs in patients with high-cost severe asthma. Mepolizumab provides real-world benefits to patients, healthcare systems and payers.

Impact of Mepolizumab on Exacerbations in the US Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common chronic respiratory disorder associated with significant disease and economic burden. Mepolizumab is an anti-IL-5 mAb approved for use as an add-on treatment in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of mepolizumab initiation on asthma exacerbation frequency, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and asthma exacerbation-related costs in a US Medicare population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of mepolizumab claims from patients with asthma in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare database carried out between January 2016 and December 2018. The index date (first claim for mepolizumab) was required to occur between January and December 2017. The baseline and follow-up periods were the 12 months before and 12 months after the index, respectively. Outcomes included changes in the proportion of patients experiencing exacerbations (primary), OCS use (secondary), and asthma exacerbation-related costs during the baseline and follow-up periods.

RESULTS

The study identified 1,278 patients (mean age, 67.9 years; 65% female) with one or more prescription or administration claim for mepolizumab who were eligible for study inclusion. There was a significant relative reduction in the proportion of patients with an asthma exacerbation (27%; P < .0001) in the follow-up versus baseline period. Similarly, a lower proportion of patients received OCS for asthma (16% relative reduction; P < .0001), fewer patients were chronic OCS users (5 mg/day or more; 48% relative reduction; P < .0001), and there was a significant decrease in asthma exacerbation-related costs (total reduction, $888; P = .0002) during the follow-up versus the baseline period.

CONCLUSION

Mepolizumab reduced exacerbations, OCS use, and exacerbation-related healthcare costs in a US Medicare population, confirming its benefits in this specific population with severe asthma.

Real-World Experience on the Use of Mepolizumab from the Severe Asthma Registry of the German Asthma Net (MepoGAN-Study)

Purpose

The German Asthma Net (GAN) operates a Severe Asthma Registry that provides an overview of the clinical presentation and management of patients with severe asthma. Based upon data from the GAN registry, the MepoGAN study aimed to describe clinical profiles and treatment outcomes of patients who were treated with the anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody mepolizumab (Nucala^TM) in routine practice in Germany.

Patients and Methods

The MepoGAN study is a descriptive retrospective non-interventional cohort study. Mepolizumab patients enrolled in the GAN registry were evaluated with results being described in two different data sets: Cohort 1 (n=131) started on mepolizumab when the patients entered the registry. Results were reported after 4 months of therapy. Patients in Cohort 2 (n=220) were on treatment with mepolizumab at the time of enrollment and follow-up data were collected after a further year of treatment. Outcome measures included asthma control, lung function, disease symptoms, OCS use, and exacerbations.

Results

Patients enrolled in the registry who started on mepolizumab in Cohort 1 had a mean age of 55 years, were former smokers in 51% of the cases, had a mean blood eosinophil count of 500 cells/μL, and frequently had maintenance OCS use (55%). In this real-world setting, mepolizumab therapy was associated with a clinically relevant reduction in blood eosinophils (-445.7 cells/μL), OCS use (-30%), and improvement in asthma control. Fifty-five percent (vs 10% at baseline) of the patients reported controlled or partially controlled asthma 4 months after starting therapy. In patients who were already treated with mepolizumab at registry enrollment (Cohort 2), asthma control and lung function remained stable after a further year of observation.

Conclusion

The GAN registry data confirm the effectiveness of mepolizumab in a real-world setting. Treatment benefits are maintained over time. While the asthma of patients treated in routine practice was more severe, the results observed with mepolizumab are broadly consistent with RCTs.

Biologics for severe asthma: The real-world evidence, effectiveness of switching, and prediction factors for the efficacy

Biologics have been a key component of severe asthma treatment, and there are currently biologics available that target IgE, IL-5, IL-4/IL-13, and TSLP. Randomized controlled trials have established clinical evidence, but a significant portion of patients with severe asthma in real-life settings would have been excluded from those trials. Therefore, real-world research is necessary, and there is a growing body of information about the long-term efficacy and safety of biologics. Multiple clinical phenotypes of severe asthma exist, and it is crucial to choose patients based on their phenotypes. Blood eosinophil count is an important biomarker for anti-IL-5 therapies, and FeNO and eosinophil counts serve as prediction markers for dupilumab. Reliable markers for predicting response, however, have not yet been fully established for omalizumab. Identification of clinical or biological prediction factors is crucial for the path toward clinical remission because the current treatment goal includes clinical remission, which is defined as a realistic goal for remission off treatment. Additionally, since there are now multiple biologic options and overlaps in eligibility for biologics in clinical practice, the evidence regarding the effectiveness of switching the biologics is crucial. Investigations into the clinical trajectory following the cessation of biologics are another important issue. Recent research on omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab and dupilumab's real-world effectiveness, the prediction factor for the efficacy, and the impact of switching or discontinuation will be reviewed and discussed in this review.

Critical evaluation of asthma biomarkers in clinical practice

The advent of personalized medicine has revolutionized the whole approach to the management of asthma, representing the essential basis for future developments. The cornerstones of personalized medicine are the highest precision in diagnosis, individualized prediction of disease evolution, and patient-tailored treatment. To this aim, enormous efforts have been established to discover biomarkers able to predict patients' phenotypes according to clinical, functional, and bio-humoral traits. Biomarkers are objectively measured characteristics used as indicators of biological or pathogenic processes or clinical responses to specific therapeutic interventions. The diagnosis of type-2 asthma, prediction of response to type-2 targeted treatments, and evaluation of the risk of exacerbation and lung function impairment have been associated with biomarkers detectable either in peripheral blood or in airway samples. The surrogate nature of serum biomarkers, set up to be less invasive than sputum analysis or bronchial biopsies, has shown several limits concerning their clinical applicability. Routinely used biomarkers, like peripheral eosinophilia, total IgE, or exhaled nitric oxide, result, even when combined, to be not completely satisfactory in segregating different type-2 asthma phenotypes, particularly in the context of severe asthma where the choice among different biologics is compelling. Moreover, the type-2 low fraction of patients is not only an orphan of biological treatments but is at risk of being misdiagnosed due to the low negative predictive value of type-2 high biomarkers. Sputum inflammatory cell analysis, considered the highest specific biomarker in discriminating eosinophilic inflammation in asthma, and therefore elected as the gold standard in clinical trials and research models, demonstrated many limits in clinical applicability. Many factors may influence the measure of these biomarkers, such as corticosteroid intake, comorbidities, and environmental exposures or habits. Not least, biomarkers variability over time is a confounding factor leading to wrong clinical choices. In this narrative review, we try to explore many aspects concerning the role of routinely used biomarkers in asthma, applying a critical view over the "state of the art" and contemporarily offering an overview of the most recent evidence in this field.

REALITI-A Study: Real-World Oral Corticosteroid-Sparing Effect of Mepolizumab in Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe asthma may require maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS) for disease control as well as systemic corticosteroid (SCS) bursts for clinically significant exacerbations. However, mOCS and SCS use are associated with adverse effects, which increases patient disease burden.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the real-world corticosteroid-sparing effect of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma.

METHODS

REALITI-A was a 24-month international, prospective, observational cohort study involving 84 centers across Europe, Canada, and the United States, with a 1-year pre-post mepolizumab treatment preplanned interim analysis. A total of 822 adults with a clinical diagnosis of asthma and a physician decision to initiate mepolizumab treatment (100 mg subcutaneously) were included. End points included daily mOCS dose at baseline (penultimate 28 days of pretreatment) and 1 year after treatment; percent reduction from baseline in mOCS dose; patients discontinuing mOCS 1 year after treatment; and the rate of clinically significant exacerbations (those requiring OCS for 3 days or more [or parenteral administration], emergency room visit, and/or hospital admission) before and after treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 319 patients received mOCS at baseline (median [interquartile range]: 10.0 [5.0-15.0] mg/d). At 1 year after treatment, median mOCS dose was reduced by 75% (2.5 [0.0-5.0] mg/d); 64% of patients had a reduction in mOCS dose of 50% or greater compared with baseline and 43% discontinued mOCS. Clinically significant exacerbations decreased between pretreatment and posttreatment (rate ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.29 [0.26-0.32]; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

This 1-year analysis demonstrates that real-world mepolizumab treatment is clinically effective in patients with severe asthma, providing disease control while reducing the need for mOCS and SCS bursts.

Temporal Dynamics of the Nasopharyngeal Microbiome and its Relationship with Childhood Asthma Exacerbation

Despite distinct nasopharyngeal microbiome (NPM) profiles between asthmatics and healthy subjects, little is known about the NPM dynamics and its relation to childhood asthma exacerbation (AE). We investigated NPM changes by longitudinally collecting 135 flocked nasopharyngeal swabs (FNPSs) from 33 school-age asthmatic children at six time points (2 to 4-week intervals) from September to December 2017 in Hong Kong. Subjects were categorized into AE and stable asthma (AS) groups according to whether they experienced any exacerbation during follow-up. One-off FNPSs from nine nonasthmatic children were included as controls. Microbiota profiles were analyzed using 16S rRNA gene sequencing. All 144 NPMs were classified into six microbiome profile groups (MPGs), each dominated by Moraxella, Corynebacterium 1, Dolosigranulum, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, or Anoxybacillus. The microbial diversity and compositions of NPM in exacerbation samples were different from both baseline samples and those from healthy controls. Moraxella and Dolosigranulum-dominated NPM exhibited high temporal stability revealed by MPG transition analysis. NPM diversity decreased whereas microbial composition remained similar over time. The relative abundances of Moraxella increased while Corynebacterium 1, Anoxybacillus, and Pseudomonas decreased longitudinally. However, these temporal patterns did not differ between AE and AS groups, suggesting that short-term dynamic patterns were not sufficient to predict AE occurrence. Asthmatic NPM underwent Moraxella expansion during AE and presented a high microbiome resilience (recovery potential) after AE resolution. Microbial pathways involved in methane, ketone bodies, and vitamin B3 metabolisms were enhanced during AE and primarily contributed by Moraxella. IMPORTANCE Evidence on the dynamic changes of NPM in asthmatic patients remains limited. Here, we present that asthmatic NPMs deviating from a healthy status still showed resilience after disturbance. Our data imply from a longitudinal perspective that Moraxella increase is closely related to AE occurrence. The finding of functional dysbiosis (imbalance) during AE offers a plausible explanation for the known association between nasopharyngeal Moraxella expansion and increased AE risk. This work serves as a basis for future long-term prospective studies leveraging multiomics approaches to elucidate the temporal association between NPM and pediatric AE.

Biologic Use and Outcomes Among Adults with Severe Asthma Treated by United States Subspecialists

BACKGROUND

Multiple biologics are now available for severe asthma (SA) treatment and can improve outcomes for patients. However, few available data describe the real-world use and effectiveness of multiple approved biologics, including biologic switching, among subspecialists in the United States (US).

OBJECTIVE

We examined biologic use and associated exacerbation outcomes in a large cohort of subspecialist-treated US adults with SA.

METHODS

CHRONICLE is an ongoing, noninterventional study of subspecialist-treated US adults with SA receiving biologics, maintenance systemic corticosteroids (mSCS), or those persistently uncontrolled by high-dose inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. For enrolled patients, sites report asthma exacerbations and medication use starting 12 months before enrollment. For patients enrolled between February 2018 and February 2021, biologic use and exacerbation outcomes before and after biologic initiation are described.

RESULTS

Among 2793 enrolled patients, 66% (n = 1832) were receiving biologics. The most utilized biologic (more than one biologic use per patient allowed) was omalizumab (47%), followed by benralizumab (27%), mepolizumab (26%), dupilumab (18%), and reslizumab (3%). Overall, 16% of patients had biologic switches, 13% had stops, and 89% had ongoing biologic use. Patients starting and switching biologics experienced a 58% (1.80 vs 0.76 per patient-year) and 49% (1.47 vs 0.75 per patient-year) reduction in exacerbations, respectively (both P < 0.001), with a numerically greater reduction observed among those starting non-anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) biologics compared to anti-IgE.

CONCLUSION

Real-world starting and switching of biologic therapies for SA was associated with meaningful reductions in exacerbations. With increasing biologic options available, individualized approaches to therapy may improve patient outcomes.

Reduction in asthma exacerbation rate after mepolizumab treatment initiation in patients with severe asthma: A real-world database study in Japan

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the changes in asthma exacerbation, as well as in oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, exacerbation-related healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and healthcare costs before and after mepolizumab treatment initiation in patients with severe asthma who started treatment with mepolizumab in a real-world clinical setting in Japan.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, self-controlled study was conducted in Japan using a hospital-based administrative claims database. Patients who were diagnosed with asthma and who were new users of mepolizumab were included in the study. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of any asthma exacerbation/patient-year during the 12-month period before (baseline period) and after (follow-up period) the first mepolizumab prescription. Secondary outcome measures included the proportion of patients with ≥1 any asthma exacerbation, patients with exacerbation requiring hospitalization, the incidence rate of exacerbations requiring hospitalization/patient-year, the median daily OCS dose (OCS sparing effect), exacerbation-related HRU (hospitalization length, the proportion of patients with emergency visits, and the number of emergency/outpatient visits), and associated costs.

RESULTS

Of the 377 patients included, 56.2% were ≥65 years of age. Following the first mepolizumab prescription, incidence rates for any asthma exacerbation were reduced by 40.6% (4.00/patient-year to 2.38/patient-year; the incidence rate ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.60 [0.53-0.67]; p < 0.0001) from the baseline to follow-up periods. The incidence rate of exacerbations requiring hospitalization was reduced by 55.8% (0.37/patient-year to 0.16/patient-year) from the baseline to follow-up periods. The proportion of patients experiencing any exacerbation decreased from 84.4% to 57.8% and those requiring hospitalization decreased from 23.9% to 10.3% both from the baseline to follow-up periods. The median daily OCS dose decreased by 44.6% (median [interquartile range]: 6.7 [4.7-9.9] mg/day to 3.3 [0.9-5.6] mg/day) from the last baseline quarter to the 4th quarter of the follow-up period. All exacerbation-related HRUs decreased from the baseline to follow-up periods. Inpatient cost reduced by >50% (123,279 Japanese Yen [JPY]/patient-year vs. 57,283 JPY/patient-year), reducing the total cost by 80,716 JPY from the baseline to follow-up periods.

CONCLUSION

Mepolizumab was effective in treating patients with severe asthma by reducing the incidence rates of exacerbations and exacerbation requiring hospitalization, OCS dose, exacerbation-related HRU, and cost in routine clinical practice in Japan.

A rational approach to compare and select biologic therapeutics in asthma

OBJECTIVE

To review key literature on asthma biologic therapeutics-currently available and under investigation-to inform a rational approach to select biologics for the management of people with severe asthma by precision medicine.

DATA SOURCES

We used the PubMed database to review literature on biologic therapeutics in asthma.

STUDY SELECTIONS

We included published randomized control trials and real-world studies on biologic therapeutics, available in English, through September 2021.

RESULTS

Increased understanding of asthma endotypes and the roles of various inflammatory mechanisms has led to therapeutic agents that inhibit specific cytokines or immune pathways. Currently available biologic therapeutics target type 2-high asthma. Grouped by mechanisms of action, there are the following 3 types: (1) anti-immunoglobulin E, (2) anti-interleukin (IL)-5 or IL-5 receptor, and (3) anti-IL-4 receptor α. There are also various potential future biologic therapeutics currently under investigation. Although there remains a paucity of data regarding prospective direct head-to-head comparisons of biologic therapeutics in asthma, there are some retrospective and indirect comparison data available.

CONCLUSION

Precision medicine guides selection of biologic therapeutics along with shared decision-making. Biomarkers, although not comprehensive, allow approximations of likely mechanisms. Use of biomarkers, to include historical levels and trends, in addition to consideration of key clinical characteristics and comorbidities can greatly help guide biologic selection. Efficacy, safety, potential adverse effects, indications for other key comorbidities, and logistics should also be considered.

From DREAM to REALITI-A and beyond: Mepolizumab for the treatment of eosinophil-driven diseases

Effective treatment of inflammatory diseases is often challenging owing to their heterogeneous pathophysiology. Understanding of the underlying disease mechanisms is improving and it is now clear that eosinophils play a complex pathophysiological role in a broad range of type 2 inflammatory diseases. Standard of care for these conditions often still includes oral corticosteroids (OCS) and/or cytotoxic immune therapies, which are associated with debilitating side effects. Selective, biological eosinophil‐reducing agents provide treatment options that improve clinical symptoms associated with eosinophilic inflammation and reduce OCS use. Mepolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and neutralizes interleukin‐5, the major cytokine involved in eosinophil proliferation, activation, and survival. Mepolizumab is approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis and hypereosinophilic syndrome. Additionally, the efficacy of add‐on mepolizumab has been observed in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with an eosinophilic phenotype. Here, we review the development, approval, and real‐world effectiveness of mepolizumab for the treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, from the DREAM to REALITI‐A studies, and describe how knowledge from this journey extended to the use of mepolizumab and other biologics across a broad spectrum of eosinophilic diseases.

TH17 cells and corticosteroid insensitivity in severe asthma

Asthma is classically described as having either a type 2 (T2) eosinophilic phenotype or a non-T2 neutrophilic phenotype. T2 asthma usually responds to classical bronchodilation therapy and corticosteroid treatment. Non-T2 neutrophilic asthma is often more severe. Patients with non-T2 asthma or late-onset T2 asthma show poor response to the currently available anti-inflammatory therapies. These therapeutic failures result in increased morbidity and cost associated with asthma and pose a major health care problem. Recent evidence suggests that some non-T2 asthma is associated with elevated T_H17 cell immune responses. T_H17 cells producing Il-17A and IL-17F are involved in the neutrophilic inflammation and airway remodeling processes in severe asthma and have been suggested to contribute to the development of subsets of corticosteroid-insensitive asthma. This review explores the pathologic role of T_H17 cells in corticosteroid insensitivity of severe asthma and potential targets to treat this endotype of asthma.

Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: treatment efficacy by comorbidity and blood eosinophil count

BACKGROUND

In the Phase III SYNAPSE study, mepolizumab reduced nasal polyp (NP) size and nasal obstruction in chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of mepolizumab in patients from SYNAPSE grouped by comorbid asthma, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD), and baseline blood eosinophil count (BEC).

METHODS

SYNAPSE, a randomized, double-blind, 52-week study (NCT03085797), included patients with severe bilateral CRSwNP eligible for surgery despite intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Patients received 4-weekly subcutaneous mepolizumab 100 mg or placebo plus standard of care for 52 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were change in total endoscopic NP score (Week 52) and nasal obstruction visual analog scale (VAS) score (Weeks 49-52). Subgroup analyses by comorbid asthma and AERD status, and post hoc by BEC, were exploratory.

RESULTS

Analyses included 407 patients (289 with asthma; 108 with AERD; 371 and 278 with BEC counts ≥150 or ≥300 cells/μL, respectively). The proportion of patients with ≥1-point improvement from baseline in NP score was higher with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid diseases (asthma: 52.9% vs 29.5%; AERD: 51.1% vs 20.6%) and baseline BEC subgroups (<150 cells/μL: 55.0% vs 31.3%; ≥150 cells/μL: 49.5% vs 28.1%; <300 cells/μL: 50.7% vs 29.0%; ≥300 cells/μL: 50.4% vs 28.1%). A similar trend was observed in patients without comorbid asthma or AERD. More patients had >3-point improvement in nasal obstruction VAS score with mepolizumab versus placebo across comorbid subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Mepolizumab reduced polyp size and nasal obstruction in CRSwNP regardless of the presence of comorbid asthma or AERD.

CLINICAL IMPLICATION

Mepolizumab should be considered for the treatment of CRSwNP, particularly in patients with comorbid asthma or AERD.

A Renewed Charter: Key Principles to Improve Patient Care in Severe Asthma

Asthma is a heterogenous respiratory disease, usually associated with chronic airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness, which affects an estimated 339 million people worldwide. Severe asthma affects approximately 5-10% of patients with asthma, approximately 17-34 million people globally, more than half of whom have uncontrolled disease. Severe asthma carries a substantial burden of disease, including unpredictable symptoms and potentially life-threatening flare-ups. Furthermore, severe asthma has a substantial burden on health care systems and economies worldwide. In 2018, a group of experts from the clinical community, patient support groups, and professional organisations joined together to develop the Severe Asthma Patient Charter, which set out six principles to define what patients should expect for the management of their severe asthma and what should constitute a basic standard of care. Since the publication of that original Charter in 2018, several important changes have occurred, including an improved understanding of asthma and effective asthma management; several new therapies have become available; and finally, the COVID-19 pandemic has placed a spotlight on respiratory conditions, the workforces that treat them, and the fundamental importance of health care system resilience. With those developments in mind, we, representatives of the academic, clinical, and patient advocacy group communities, have updated the Charter to Improve Patient Care in Severe Asthma with a focus on six principles: (1) I deserve a timely, comprehensive assessment of my asthma and its severity; (2) I deserve a timely, straightforward referral to an appropriate specialist for my asthma when it is not well controlled; (3) I deserve to understand what makes my asthma worse; (4) I deserve access to treatment and care that reduces the impact of asthma on my daily life; (5) I deserve not to be reliant on systemic corticosteroids; (6) I deserve to be involved in decisions about my treatment and care.

Real-life effectiveness of mepolizumab in severe asthma: a systematic literature review

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma in randomized controlled trials is well established. Following approval of mepolizumab as add-on therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma in multiple regions worldwide, it is now important to determine its impact in real-world settings in which patients are not subject to stringent eligibility criteria. This systematic literature review assessed published evidence of clinical outcomes, safety, and healthcare resource use among patients with severe asthma receiving mepolizumab in real-world settings.

DATA SOURCES

Searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, and MEDLINE In-Process via Ovid.

STUDY SELECTIONS

Eligible studies were observational, and enrolled ≥10 patients with asthma who received mepolizumab 100 mg subcutaneously. Data extracted included annualized exacerbation rate, mean daily oral corticosteroid (OCS) dose, proportion of patients using OCS, several measures of lung function, patient-reported asthma control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), safety, and economic burden.

RESULTS

Twenty-three articles (22 unique studies; 2,040 patients with severe asthma on mepolizumab) were identified. Mepolizumab use was associated with a reduction in annualized exacerbation rates (requiring OCS) of 54-97% (p < 0.05 in all studies), reduced mean/median daily OCS doses, and OCS discontinuation during follow-up (27-84% of patients). Improvements in lung function, asthma control, and HRQoL were also observed. The most commonly reported adverse events included headache and arthralgia; discontinuation of mepolizumab due to adverse events occurred in 0-10.6% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Findings show that patients with severe asthma consistently demonstrate clinically relevant benefits with mepolizumab treatment in a real-world setting.

Supplemental data for this article is available online at at www.tandfonline.com/ijas .

Real-world impact of mepolizumab in patients with life-threatening asthma: US insurance claims database analysis

PURPOSE

Patients with life-threatening asthma typically experience recurrent exacerbations, are dependent on oral corticosteroids (OCSs), and have considerable asthma-related health care costs. Data on the impact of mepolizumab on exacerbations and OCS use in patients with life-threatening asthma in real-world clinical practice are limited. This study assessed the impact of mepolizumab on exacerbation rates and OCS use in patients with life-threatening asthma in a real-word setting.

METHODS

This retrospective study utilized data from US administrative claims from patients with life-threatening asthma. Eligible patients were treated between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017; were ≥12 years of age upon mepolizumab initiation (index date); and had undergone at least two mepolizumab administrations during the 6 months postindex. Data from the 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) index were collected, with each patient serving as his or her own control. Life-threatening asthma was defined as at least three exacerbations and/or at least one asthma-related hospitalization during baseline, and/or a history of endotracheal intubation. Asthma exacerbation frequency and OCS use were assessed.

FINDINGS

The analysis included 327 patients who received a mean (SD) of 10.6 (4.3) mepolizumab doses during follow-up. The percentage of patients experiencing at least one exacerbation and the mean exacerbation rate were significantly reduced from baseline to follow-up with mepolizumab, from 94.5% to 67.9% (P < 0.001), and from 3.2 to 1.5 events per patient per year, corresponding to a 53.1% relative reduction (P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with OCS claims was reduced by 12.6%, from 99.1% to 86.5% (P < 0.001). Of the patients who had a reduction in mean daily OCS use, most (57.9%, 140/242) had a reduction in mean daily OCS use of at least 50%.

IMPLICATIONS

These data from patients with life-threatening asthma in clinical practice demonstrated that asthma exacerbation and OCS use were significantly reduced with mepolizumab treatment.

Real-world benefits of biologics for asthma: Exacerbation events and systemic corticosteroid use

Background

Studies have shown the efficacy of asthma biologics in real-world settings, confirming the generalizability of randomized controlled trial (RCT) results, but studies on more than one biologic are scarce. Accordingly, little is known about the different background characteristics in users of asthma biologics. This study aimed to describe the backgrounds of asthma patients using biologics (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab) and examine the effectiveness of these biologics for reducing asthma exacerbations and total systemic corticosteroid doses.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using self-controlled methods to evaluate the association between the use of biologics and reduction in exacerbations and hospitalizations using a large-scale health insurance claims database in Japan.

Results

Of 355 continuously treated asthma patients using biologics, 119, 82, 69, and 85 patients were assigned to the omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab groups, respectively. The baseline characteristics differed among users of biologics. The incidence ratios of exacerbations and hospitalizations during biologics use were 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.74) and 0.65 (0.55-0.77) compared with the period before biologics use. The total systemic corticosteroid dose equivalent to prednisolone per person-year was reduced from a median of 600 [interquartile range, 90-1713] mg to 164 [0-1010] mg (P < .001). Similar results were obtained for individual biologics with a few exceptions.

Conclusions

The background characteristics of biologics users differed in a real-world setting. Our results confirmed findings from RCTs demonstrating that each biologic (omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab) is associated with decreased exacerbation numbers and corticosteroid-sparing effects, even outside of the controlled settings of RCTs.

A real-world study of ICS use in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab

BACKGROUND

Mepolizumab is a humanized anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). There is limited evidence that patients treated with mepolizumab can reduce inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate changes in ICS use and clinical outcomes in patients with SEA who initiated mepolizumab treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study (GSK ID: 212695/HO-20-19951) used administrative claims data from the IBM Watson Health MarketScan Database (identification period: November 2015-March 2018). Eligible patients had SEA and were receiving high-dose ICS and mepolizumab. ICS, oral corticosteroid (OCS), short acting β2-agonist (SABA) use, and exacerbation frequency were analyzed quarterly during the 12-month follow-up period following mepolizumab initiation.

RESULTS

In total, 351 patients were included. The proportion of patients using highdose ICS decreased in quarters 1-4 following mepolizumab initiation (79.8%, 74.6%, 68.9%, 65.5%, respectively); 49.0% of patients reduced or discontinued ICS for ≥1 quarter. Comparing patients who discontinued ICS versus those who remained on high-dose ICS, a lower proportion had chronic OCS use (3.4-9.2% vs 13.9-16.8%) and OCS burst use (15.4-20.8% vs 19.7-26.1%) in quarters 1-4; similarly in quarters 3 and 4, a lower proportion of patients had exacerbations (16.9% and 20.3% vs 27.2% and 27.7%) and SABA claims (35.4% and 39.2% vs 43.3% and 49.0%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients with SEA on high-dose ICS, a reduction in both ICS and OCS use was observed after initiating mepolizumab. These findings have important implications for clinical outcomes and follow-up care in this patient population.

Characteristics of new adult users of mepolizumab with asthma in the USA

BACKGROUND

In the USA, over 25 million people have asthma; 5%-10% of cases are severe. Mepolizumab (Nucala) is an interleukin-5 antagonist monoclonal antibody; it was approved by the FDA in 2015 as add-on maintenance treatment of severe asthma for patients aged ≥12 years with an eosinophilic phenotype.

OBJECTIVES

(1) Describe baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of new US adult mepolizumab users 2015-2019, (2) describe asthma medication use in the 12 months preceding initiation of and concomitant with mepolizumab and (3) assess mepolizumab adherence, persistence and discontinuation patterns in 12 months postinitiation.

METHODS

We conducted a new-user observational cohort study using data from Aetna, a CVS Health Company, HealthCore (Anthem), Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, and IBM MarketScan Research Databases. Curated administrative claims data in the FDA Sentinel System common data model format and publicly available Sentinel analytical tools were used to query the databases. We included adults who initiated mepolizumab in 2015-2019 with an asthma diagnosis in the preceding 12 months and no evidence of cystic fibrosis. We examined age, sex, comorbid conditions, asthma medication use and severe asthma exacerbations.

RESULTS

We identified 3496 adults (mean age 54.2 years, SD 12.5 years) who initiated mepolizumab. In the 12 months before mepolizumab initiation, 22% had received inhaled corticosteroids, 46% had inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta agonists, 72.6% had leukotriene antagonists, 38% had long-acting muscarinic antagonist, 18% had omalizumab,<1% had reslizumab, dupilumab or benralizumab. In the previous 12 months, 70% had a diagnosis of allergic rhinitis, 32% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 17% eosinophilia and 3% eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Further, 56% had an asthma-related ambulatory visit, 73%≥1 course of oral corticosteroids lasting 3-27 days, 10% an asthma-related emergency department visit and 22% an asthma-related hospitalisation. In the 12 months following initiation, the mean proportion of days covered was 70%, and reductions in the average mean dispensings of rescue oral corticosteriods (35%) and omalizumab (61%) were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with asthma treated with mepolizumab had varying levels of healthcare utilisation and we observed evidence of mepolizumab use in patients without severe asthma.

Exacerbations in US Severe Asthma: Incidence, Characteristics, Predictors, and Effects of Biologic Treatments

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe asthma (SA) have a heightened risk of exacerbations, including hospitalization. The real-world, specialist-verified incidence and characteristics of exacerbations among patients with SA in the United States (US) have not been described.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the real-world incidence, characteristics, and predictors of exacerbations among patients with SA in the US.

METHODS

CHRONICLE is an ongoing observational study of specialist-treated US adults with SA receiving biologic treatment or maintenance systemic corticosteroids (SCS), or uncontrolled by high-dosage inhaled corticosteroids with additional controllers. For patients enrolled February 2018 to February 2020, annualized rates and characteristics of exacerbation-related events were summarized by treatment category for 12 months before enrollment and after enrollment through the latest data collection. Results were further analyzed for subgroups of interest.

RESULTS

Among 1884 enrolled patients, 53.5% and 12.3% experienced an exacerbation and asthma hospitalization, respectively (0.81 and 0.14 per person-year). Of all exacerbations, 36%, 9%, and 15% required an unscheduled healthcare provider visit, emergency department visit without hospitalization, and hospitalization, respectively. Among patients not receiving biologics or SCS, higher blood eosinophil count, higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and lower total immunoglobulin E level were associated with higher exacerbation rates. Exacerbation rates decreased after starting or switching biologics (n = 1299). Multivariate analyses of enrolled patients showed prior-year exacerbations/hospitalizations, lack of asthma control, and geographic region also predicted event risk.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world cohort of specialist-treated US adults with SA, there was a substantial burden of exacerbations and associated healthcare resource utilization. Patients receiving biologics had a lower exacerbation burden.

Cost-utility analysis and budget impact of benralizumab as add-on therapy to standard care for severe eosinophilic asthma in Colombia

Introduction:Benralizumab, amonoclonal antibody for human interleukin-5, has been associated with adecrease in asthma exacerbations. The introduction of this drug raises concerns about the economic impact in scenarios with constraints. This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of benralizumab plus standard care (SoC) vs. SoC alone in adults with severe uncontrolled asthma with evidence of eosinophilic phenotype.Methods:We constructed aMarkov model with three health states (asthma on benralizumab and SOC, asthma on SOC alone, and death) from ahealthcare system perspective over alifetime horizon. The model was populated using local costs while utilities were derived from international literature. Cost and transition probabilities were obtained from amixture of Colombian-specific and internationally published data.Results:The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per patient peryear was $US 42,746per QALY gained. Benralizumab treatment would be cost-effective at the recommended societal US 18,000 WTP threshold if the cost of benralizumab is reduced by 41% more than the base case value.Conclusion:Benralizumab is not cost-effective using WTP of US$18,000per QALY threshold in Colombia. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.

Real-life cost-effectiveness of benralizumab in patients with severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Availability of clinically effective and cost-effective treatments for severe asthma would be beneficial to patients and national healthcare systems. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and healthcare expenditure after incorporating benralizumab into the standard treatment of refractory eosinophilic asthma.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional multicentre study of consecutive patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma who received treatment with benralizumab during at least 12 months. Patient follow-up was performed in specialised severe asthma units. The main effectiveness parameters measured were: the avoidance of one asthma exacerbation, a 3-point increase in the asthma control test (ACT) score, and the difference in utility scores (health-related quality of life) between a 1-year baseline treatment and 1-year benralizumab treatment. The health economic evaluation included direct costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

After 1 year of treatment with benralizumab, patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma showed an improvement in all the effectiveness parameters analysed: improvement of asthma control and lung function, and decrease in the number of exacerbations, oral corticosteroid (both as corticosteroid courses and maintenance therapy), and inhaled corticosteroid use. The total annual cost per patient for the baseline and benralizumab treatment periods were €11,544 and €14,043, respectively, reflecting an increase in costs due to the price of the biological agent but a decrease in costs for the remaining parameters. The ICER was €602 per avoided exacerbation and €983.86 for every 3-point increase in the ACT score.

CONCLUSIONS

All the pharmacoeconomic parameters analysed show that treatment with benralizumab is a cost-effective option as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory eosinophilic asthma.

Real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma and associated comorbidities

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe asthma frequently have associated comorbidities, which can compound existing symptoms, complicating asthma management.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the real-world effectiveness of mepolizumab in patients with severe asthma stratified by common overlapping comorbidities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with asthma from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Database initiating mepolizumab treatment (index date). Eligible patients had more than or equal to 1 claim (excluding claims for diagnostic tests) with a diagnosis code for more than or equal to 1 of 7 comorbidities (atopic disease, nasal polyps, chronic sinusitis, obesity, respiratory infections, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and depression/anxiety) during the 12-month preindex baseline period; these were used to stratify patients into 7 nonmutually exclusive subgroups. Outcomes included asthma exacerbations and exacerbation-related health care resource utilization during the 12-month baseline and follow-up periods. Each patient acted as their own control.

RESULTS

Of the 639 patients included, the most common comorbidities were atopic diseases (73.2%), respiratory infections (55.6%), and chronic sinusitis (45.1%). Across all 7 comorbidity subgroups, there were significant (P < .05) reductions of 38% to 55% and 57% to 83% in exacerbations and exacerbations requiring hospitalization, respectively, during the follow-up vs baseline period, except for exacerbations requiring hospitalization in the nasal polyp subgroup, owing to the small subgroup sample size. During the follow-up vs baseline periods, mean number of oral corticosteroids claims was significantly (P < .001) reduced by 29% to 38%; 39% to 47% of patients achieved greater than or equal to 50% oral corticosteroids dose reduction. Significant reductions in exacerbation-related health care resource utilization were also observed.

CONCLUSION

Mepolizumab treatment provided real-world clinical benefits in patients.

Real-World Effectiveness of Mepolizumab in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Mepolizumab is a human monoclonal antibody against interleukin 5 (IL-5) used to treat severe eosinophilic asthma. Several studies have evaluated the effectiveness of mepolizumab in the real world. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in the context of heterogeneity among patients, clinicians, and treatment regimens to study the effectiveness of mepolizumab in the real world.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed and Embase databases for real-world studies on severe asthma treatment with mepolizumab as of June 30, 2020. Exacerbations, asthma-related hospitalizations, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) or Asthma Control Test (ACT), corticosteroid use, peripheral blood eosinophil counts, and the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide were selected as indicators to evaluate the effectiveness. Standardized mean differences by the Cohen method and mean differences were chosen as indicators of effect size. Cohen d values of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 are considered as small, medium, and large effects, respectively. We used the Dersimonian-Laird random-effect model to quantify pooled effectiveness estimates.

FINDINGS

A total of 1457 patients from 13 studies were included in this review. At all time points, mepolizumab was associated with reductions in exacerbations (2.92 and 2.73 events per patient per year fewer at 6 and 12 months, respectively) and hospitalizations (0.36 events per patient per year fewer at 12 months); improvements in asthma control (ACQ scores reductions of 1.32 and 1.03 at 6 and 12 months, respectively; ACT scores increase of 6.52 at 6-12 months); slight improvements in pulmonary function (FEV₁ increase of 0.23 L at 1-3 months and 6-12 months, respectively); reductions in oral corticosteroid use (9.02- and 7.68-mg decrease at 6 and 12 months, respectively); and reductions in peripheral blood eosinophil counts (decreases of 559.11 cells/μL and 599.17 cells/μL at 1-3 months and 6-12 months, respectively) and fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (13-ppb reduction at 6-12 months).

IMPLICATIONS

Our study suggests that mepolizumab is associated with improvements in several clinically meaningful real-world outcomes. This study is a supplement to and extension of the efficacy of randomized controlled trials of mepolizumab. (Clin Ther. 2021;XX:XXX-XXX) © 2021 Elsevier HS Journals, Inc.

Economic impact of mepolizumab in uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma, in real life

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Severe asthma is burdened by frequent exacerbations and use of oral corticosteroids (OCS) which worsen patients' health and increase healthcare spending. Aim of this study was to assess the clinical and economic effect of adding mepolizumab (MEP) for the treatment of these patients.

METHODS

Patients >18 years old, referred to 8 asthma clinics, starting MEP between May 2017 and December 2018, were enrolled and followed-up for 12 months. Information in the 12 months before mepolizumab were collected retrospectively. The evaluation parameters included: OCS use, number of exacerbations/hospitalizations, concomitant therapies, comorbidity, and annual number of working days lost due to the disease. The primary objective was to compare the annual total cost per patient pre- and post-MEP. Secondary outcomes included rates of exacerbations and number of OCS-dependent patients.

RESULTS

106 patients were enrolled in the study: 46 male, median age 58 years. Mean annual cost pre- and post-MEP (cost of biologic excluded) was €3996 and €1,527, respectively. Total savings due to MEP resulted in €2469 (95%CI 1945-2993), 62% due to exacerbations reduction and 33% due to productivity increase. Such savings could fund about 22% of the total cost of MEP for one year. The introduction of MEP induced a clinical benefit by reducing both OCS-dependent patients (OR = 0.12, 95%CI 0.06-0.23) and exacerbation rate (RR = 0.19, 95%CI 0.15-0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with severe eosinophilic asthma experienced a clinical benefit in asthma control adding MEP to standard therapy. Biologic therapy can be, partially, funded by the savings produced by patients' improvement.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of anti-IL-5 therapies of severe eosinophilic asthma in Spain

AIM

To analyse the cost-effectiveness of MEP with standard of care (SoC) versus other anti-IL-5 therapies approved for the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) patients, within the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective.

METHODS

A Markov model with a 4-week cycle length was used to compare MEP with BEN and RES as therapies added to SoC in the management of SEA, in terms of cost per QALY gained and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Costs (€2019) were obtained from public sources, while utilities and transition probabilities were retrieved from literature, e.g. network meta-analysis. Continuation criteria for biological treatment and reduction of oral corticosteroids (OCS) was set at 50% minimum reduction of exacerbation rate. Adverse events related to chronic OCS use included diabetes, osteoporosis, cataracts, acute myocardial infarct, and peptic ulcer. The analysis was performed over a 5-year time horizon from the National Healthcare System (NHCS) perspective, with a yearly discount rate of 3% applied to both costs and QALYs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis and univariate deterministic sensitivity analysis were performed to address uncertainty around the cost-effectiveness results.

RESULTS

On top of SoC, the model indicates that MEP is dominant (lower cost, higher benefit) compared to BEN and RES: For BEN and RES, respectively, treatment with MEP had a point estimate of 0.076 and 0.075 additional QALYs, and savings of €3,173.47 and €7,772.95 per patient. The findings were robust to variation as estimated using sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

MEP is a cost-effective treatment in comparison with BEN and RES added to SoC for patients with SEA in the Spanish setting.

Real-World Reductions in Oral Corticosteroid Use in the USA Following Mepolizumab Therapy for Severe Asthma

Background

Patients with severe asthma often require oral corticosteroid (OCS) treatment. Clinical trials have demonstrated that mepolizumab can reduce OCS dependence, but real-world data are limited.

Objective

To evaluate the impact of mepolizumab on OCS use, asthma exacerbations, and asthma exacerbation-related costs in a real-world setting.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study (GSK ID: 209642; HO-19-19597) analyzed data from the MarketScan^® Commercial database (identification period: November 2015–September 2017). Patients were ≥12 years old at mepolizumab initiation (index date), had a baseline asthma diagnosis, and received ≥2 mepolizumab administrations in the first 6 months of follow-up. OCS use, asthma exacerbation rate, and asthma exacerbation-related costs were assessed in the 12-months before (baseline) and 12-months after (follow-up) mepolizumab initiation.

Results

Mepolizumab was associated with a 14.7% reduction in the proportion of patients with ≥1 OCS claim from baseline to follow-up (93.4% vs 79.7%; P<0.001). The mean numbers of OCS claims/patient and OCS bursts (≥20 mg prednisone equivalents for 3‒28 days) between baseline and follow-up were also reduced by 29.1% (P<0.001) and 36.8% (P<0.001), respectively. Reductions in chronic OCS use were demonstrated during follow-up in patients with baseline mean OCS dose ≥5mg and those with a mean OCS dose ≥10mg 90 days before index; the proportion of patients with no OCS use also increased from 6.6% to 20.3% between baseline and follow-up.

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrate that mepolizumab therapy is associated with reduced OCS use in patients treated in a real-world setting, potentially mitigating adverse health sequelae caused by OCS use in these patients.

Assessing the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab as add-on therapy to standard of care for severe eosinophilic asthma in Singapore

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mepolizumab added to standard of care (SOC) compared with SOC alone among patients with severe uncontrolled eosinophilic asthma in the Singapore setting.

METHODS

A Markov model with three health states (asthma on mepolizumab and SOC, asthma on SOC alone, and death) was developed from a healthcare system perspective over a lifetime horizon. During each 4-week cycle, patients in the non-death health states could experience asthma exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroid burst, emergency department visit, or hospitalization. Asthma-related mortality following an exacerbation or all-cause mortality could also occur at each cycle. The model was populated using local costs while utilities were derived from international literature. Transition probabilities were obtained from a mixture of Singapore-specific and internationally published data.

RESULTS

The base-case analysis comparing mepolizumab plus SOC with SOC alone resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SGD335 486 (USD238 195) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the ICER was most sensitive to the price of mepolizumab, followed by the proportion of exacerbations which required hospital intensive care. Despite restricting mepolizumab use to patients with a higher baseline exacerbation rate (3 in the past year) in a scenario analysis, the ICER remained high at SGD238 876 (USD 169 602) per QALY gained.

CONCLUSION

At its current price, mepolizumab is not considered a cost-effective use of healthcare resources in Singapore. Substantial price reductions for mepolizumab are required to improve its cost-effectiveness to an acceptable range. These results will be useful to inform national funding decisions.

Anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of asthma: an update

INTRODUCTION

Asthma exhibits marked heterogeneity in symptoms with severe or refractory asthma representing a clear area of unmet medical need. These patients require more specifically targeted treatments with monoclonal antibody-based biologics targeted at inhibition of the type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 having considerable potential as effective treatments for severe asthma. For the most part, anti-cytokine-based biologic therapies are more likely to give significant clinical benefit in carefully selected patient populations that take asthma phenotypes and endotypes into account.

AREAS COVERED

This review is based on recent English-language original articles in Pub Med or MedLine that reported significant clinical findings on the current status, therapeutic potential and safety of the anti-IL-5 biologics mepolizumab, reslizumab and benralizumab in the treatment of severe refractory asthma.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-IL-5 treatment appears effective in patients with eosinophilic asthma through exacerbation prevention with accumulating evidence of glucocorticoid-sparing effects with an acceptable safety profile for these biologics.

Newer Biological Agents in the Treatment of Severe Asthma: Real-World Results from a Tertiary Referral Center

PURPOSE

To determine the efficacy of IL-5 inhibitory therapy in severe, refractory asthma in a real-world clinical setting from a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with severe asthma treated with IL-5 biologic therapy for ≥ 6 months at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota between January 1, 2013 and August 31, 2019.

RESULTS

Over the study period, we identified 63 patients with a mean age of 54 who received an IL-5 inhibitor for ≥ 6 months. A total of 55 patients received mepolizumab, 2 received benralizumab, and 9 patients received both. Patients were followed up for a mean of 25 months. The mean number of months of oral prednisone use prior to biologic initiation was 64. There was a significant reduction in the median dose of prednisone in the 24 months after drug initiation (15 mg vs. 0 mg; p = < 0.0001). Similarly; there was a significant decline in the median number of asthma exacerbations in the 24 months before and after drug initiation (7 vs. 2; p = < 0.0001). The mean number of emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations decreased from 5.1 and 2.0 to 1.6 and 0.4 in the 24 months before and after therapy initiation (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.007, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: IL-5 inhibitory therapy is associated with significant and long-term sustained reductions in asthma exacerbation frequency, ER visits, hospitalizations, as well as oral steroid usage in a patient population with refractory steroid-dependent asthma referred to a tertiary referral center.

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Mepolizumab Effectiveness in a Real-Life Setting

INTRODUCTION

Interleukin-5 (IL-5) is the principal cytokine regulating eosinophil growth, differentiation, activation, and expression. It is a specific target of mepolizumab, an anti-IL-5 monoclonal antibody used in the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma. This new drug can improve symptoms, reduce asthma exacerbations and steroid use. Few data are available on its efficacy for nasal symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the all-round clinical impact of mepolizumab in a real-life setting, evaluating the efficacy and safety of the drug in severe eosinophilic asthma patients.

POPULATION AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected the clinical and functional data on 27 patients (16 males) affected with severe eosinophilic asthma, diagnosed at the Siena Regional Referral Centre and monitored for 6 months. Clinical, immunological, and functional data at baseline and follow-up were entered in a database together with comorbidities, number of exacerbations, steroid treatment, multiple-flow exhaled nitric oxide, and validated questionnaires.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in asthma exacerbations was observed in all patients after 6 months of the biological therapy (p = 0.0009), and 4/6 patients discontinued chronic oral steroids. A significant improvement in ACT, FEV1, SNOT22, and alveolar nitric oxide was observed after 1 month of mepolizumab (p = 0.003, p = 0.007, p = 0.047, and p = 0.019, respectively) and maintained after 6 months of treatment. After 6 months, FeNO 50 was reduced as well (p = 0.030). Mepolizumab was very well tolerated, and no major side effects were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that mepolizumab is effective in improving control of asthma, lung function parameters, exhaled biomarkers, and nasal symptoms in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.