Clinical outcomes of patients with metachronous second primary lung adenocarcinomas

Multidisciplinary expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of multiple lung cancers

The rising incidence of multiple lung cancers (MLCs), encompassing multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) and intrapulmonary metastasis (IPM), poses two significant clinical challenges. First, distinguishing between MPLC and IPM remains difficult due to insufficiently accurate criteria and ambiguous integration of genetic testing. Second, standardized therapeutic protocols are still lacking. To address these issues, the Lung Cancer Expert Committee of China Anti-Cancer Association (CACA) assembled a multidisciplinary expert panel spanning thoracic surgery, pulmonary medicine, oncology, radiology, and pathology. Following a comprehensive literature review ending on October 23, 2024, the panel engaged in iterative discussions and conducted two rounds of expert voting, culminating in 25 evidence-based recommendations across five key domains: epidemiology, pre-treatment evaluation, definitive diagnostics, surgical treatment, and non-surgical treatment. This consensus provides clinicians with practical guidance to enhance diagnostic precision and therapeutic decision-making in MLC management while highlighting unmet needs to inform future guideline development.

Lobar or sublobar resection for early-stage second primary lung cancer ≤ 3 cm in size: a SEER population-based study

PURPOSE

Surgical strategy for second primary lung cancer (SPLC) may be more conservative due to influence of first primary lung cancer (FPLC). The optimal surgical method for SPLC warrants discussion. We aimed to explore a more suitable surgical approach for early-stage (T1-T2N0, ≤ 3 cm) SPLC and provide insights for clinical practice.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database between 2004 and 2018, and data of patients with early-stage SPLC who underwent secondary surgery were collected. Propensity score matching (PSM) reduced potential bias between lobar and sublobar resection groups. The effect of lobar and sublobar resection on overall survival (OS) was assessed in all patients and subgroups.

RESULTS

A total of 714 patients who met the study entry criteria were enrolled, including 476 patients in the sublobar resection group (66.67%) and 238 patients in the lobar resection group (33.33%). There was no difference in OS between the lobar and sublobar resection groups before and after PSM (P = 0.289) and (P = 0.608), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed that lobar resection achieved a significantly better OS than sublobar resection only in patients with an SPLC tumor size of 2-3 cm (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The OS of sublobar resection was not significantly different from that of lobar resection for early-stage SPLC. For SPLC with a 2-3 cm tumor size, lobar resection is more advantageous than sublobar resection.

Evaluation of surgical outcomes and prognostic factors of second primary lung cancer based on a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although surgery has been widely applied for SPLC therapy, there is still no uniform treatment approach. Whether SPLC and primary lung cancer have similar prognostic characteristics remains controversial. Herein, based on a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to enucleate the influences of diverse surgical strategies and underlying prognostic factors on the prognosis of patients with both the first primary lung cancer and SPLC underwent surgical resection.

METHODS

A comprehensive and systematic literature search was implemented in three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane), and eligible studies were screened following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Meanwhile, we extracted the hazard ratios (HR) together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each prognostic factor, either directly or indirectly, from the enrolled literature.

RESULTS

Eleven studies (published between 2000 and 2022) were included in this study, including 1,131 SPLC patients. The overall survival (OS) exhibited no difference between patients with lobectomy and sublobar resection after SPLC (HR: 0.87, 95%CI: 0.62-1.21, P = 0.41). The patients after completion pneumonectomy had a poor prognosis (HR: 1.85, 95% CI: 1.34-2.55, P < 0.01). Poor prognostic factors after SPLC surgery included synchronous SPLC (HR: 3.38, 95%CI: 1.53-7.46, P < 0.01), tumor diameter > 2 cm (HR: 2.44, 95%CI: 1.73-3.44, P < 0.01), solid predominant in CT morphology (HR: 3.08, 95% CI: 1.14-8.33, P = 0.03), lymph node metastasis (HR: 2.79, 95%CI: 1.40-5.56), and smoking (HR: 2.37, 95%CI: 1.08-26.82, P < 0.01). Tumor disease-free interval (DFI), tumor histological type, and gender had no impact on the prognosis of patients received SPLC surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with SPLC, especially those with poor cardiopulmonary function reserve, should be prioritized for sublobar resection for treatment. These patients should also try to avoid completion pneumonectomy. Patients with synchronous SPLC, tumor diameter > 2 cm, solid predominant in CT morphology, lymph node metastasis, and smoking had a poor prognosis. Meanwhile, SPLC has similar prognostic characteristics with single primary lung cancer. However, the study has some limitations and more evidence is warranted to verify the findings.

A meta-analysis of survival of patients with second primary non-small cell lung cancer after pulmonary lobectomy and partial pulmonary lobectomy

OBJECTIVE

A meta-analysis of the screened data was performed to investigate the survival status of patients with second primary non-small cell lung cancer (SPNSCLC) after pulmonary lobectomy and partial pulmonary lobectomy, and assess the applicability of such option in the treatment of such disease.

METHODS

Based on the databases of PubMed, Ovid, and CNKI, relevant reports on postoperative survival of patients with SPNSCLC were obtained, and the information, including authors, publication year, research type, tumor staging, tumor diameter, surgical options, reasons for resection, and overall survival (OS), was extracted. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies published from 2010 to 2017 were collected. Patients with SPNSCLC were mainly in stage Ia and Ib, 51.4% of whom underwent pulmonary lobectomy and 34.7% of whom underwent partial pulmonary lobectomy. The analysis results showed that after the second lobectomy, the mortality rate of the patients undergoing intensive surgery was 8%, the incidence of postoperative complications was 29%, and the 5-year OS rate was 53% after the second lobectomy for patients with SPNSCLC.

CONCLUSION

The survival rate of patients with SPNSCLC is lower than that of patients with early lung cancer. In view of this, surgical resection is feasible. There are remarkable differences between pulmonary lobectomy and partial pulmonary lobectomy.

Clinical features and outcomes of patients with stage I multiple primary lung cancers

The number of patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLC) is rising. We studied the clinical features and factors related to outcomes of MPLC patients using the database of surgically resected lung cancer (LC) cases compiled by the Japanese Joint Committee of Lung Cancer Registry. From the 18 978 registered cases, 9689 patients with clinical stage I non‐small‐cell lung cancer who achieved complete resection were extracted. Tumors were defined as synchronous MPLC when multiple LC was simultaneously resected or treatment was carried out within 2 years after the initial surgery; metachronous MPLC was defined as second LC treated more than 2 years after the initial surgery. Of these cases, 579 (6.0%) were synchronous MPLC and 477 (5.0%) metachronous MPLC, with 51 overlapping cases. Female sex, nonsmoker, low consolidation‐tumor ratio (CTR), and adenocarcinoma were significantly more frequent in the synchronous MPLC group, whereas patients with metachronous MPLC had higher frequencies of male sex, smoker, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and nonadenocarcinoma. There was no significant difference in survival rate between patients with and without synchronous or metachronous MPLC. Age, gender, CTR for second LC, and histological combination of primary and second LC were prognostic indicators for both types of MPLC. Logistic regression analysis showed that female sex, history of malignant disease other than LC, and COPD were risk factors for MPLC incidence. The present findings could have major implications regarding MPLC diagnosis and identification of independent prognostic factors, and provide valuable information for postoperative management of patients with MPLC.

Surgical outcomes of ipsilateral metachronous second primary lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

The optimal surgical approach for metachronous second primary lung cancer (MSPLC), especially ipsilateral MSPLC, remains unclear. This study aimed to review postoperative complications and examine surgical outcomes based on the extent of resection after surgery for ipsilateral MSPLC.

METHODS

Clinical data from 61 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for ipsilateral MSPLC according to the Martini-Melamed criteria between January 2005 and December 2017 in 3 institutes were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Postoperative complications were identified in 12 patients (19.7%). Regarding the combination of initial and second surgery, intraoperative bleeding was significantly greater in patients with anatomic-anatomic resection than in others (P < 0.001). Operation time was significantly longer in patients with anatomic-anatomic resection than in others (P < 0.001). However, postoperative complications showed no significant differences based on the combination of surgeries. Five-year overall survival rates in patients with anatomic resection and wedge resection after second surgery were 75.8% and 75.8%, respectively (P = 0.738), and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 54.2% and 67.6%, respectively (P = 0.368). Cox multivariate analysis identified ever-smoker status (P = 0.029), poor performance status (P = 0.011) and tumour size >20 mm (P = 0.001) as independent predictors of poor overall survival, while ever-smoker status (P = 0.040) and tumour size >20 mm (P = 0.007) were considered independent predictors of poor recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding postoperative and long-term outcomes for patients with ipsilateral MSPLC, surgical intervention is safe and offers good long-term survival. Wedge resection is an acceptable provided tumours ≤2 cm and ground-glass opacity-predominant as a second surgery for early-stage ipsilateral MSPLC.

Multiple Primary Lung Cancers: A New Challenge in the Era of Precision Medicine

With the widespread implementation of lung cancer screening, more and more patients are being diagnosed with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs). In the era of precision medicine, many controversies remain in differentiating MPLCs from intrapulmonary metastasis and the optimum treatment choice, especially in patients exhibiting similar histology. In this review, we summarize common diagnostic criteria and novel discrimination methods with a special emphasis on the emerging value of broad panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) for the diagnosis of MPLCs. We then discuss current advances regarding therapeutic approaches for MPLCs. Radical surgery is the main treatment modality, while stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is safe and feasible for early-stage MPLC patients with inoperable tumors. In addition, immunotherapy and targeted therapy, particularly epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are emerging therapeutic strategies that are still in their infancy. Characteristics of both genomic profiles and tumor microenvironment are currently being evaluated but warrant further exploration to facilitate the application of targeted systematic therapies in MPLC patients.

Impact of postoperative complications on outcomes of second surgery for second primary lung cancer

PURPOSE

The best surgical approach for second primary lung cancer remains a subject of debate. The purpose of this study was to review the postoperative complications after second surgery for second primary lung cancer and to investigate the outcomes based on these complications.

METHODS

The clinical data of 105 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for multiple primary lung cancers between January, 1996 and December, 2017, were reviewed according to the Martini-Melamed criteria.

RESULTS

After the second surgery, low body mass index (BMI) (< 18.5 kg/m²) (P = 0.004) and high Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of postoperative complications. Survival analysis revealed the 5-year overall survival rates of 74.5% and 61.4% for patients without postoperative complications and those with postoperative complications (P = 0.044), respectively, but the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates of 82.5% and 80.0% (P = 0.926), respectively. During this period, there were significantly more respiratory-related deaths of patients with complications than of those without complications (P = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

Surgical intervention is feasible and potentially effective for second primary lung cancer but may not achieve positive perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients with a low BMI or a high CCI. Treatment options should be considered carefully for these patients.

Outcomes after Contralateral Anatomic Surgical Resection in Multiple Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients treated surgically for lung cancer may present synchronous or metachronous lung cancers. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes after a second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for lung cancer.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective two-center study, based on a prospective indexed database. Included patients were treated surgically by bilateral anatomic surgical resection for a second primary lung cancer. We excluded nonanatomic resections, benign lesions, and ipsilateral second surgical resections.

RESULTS

Between January 2011 and September 2018, 55 patients underwent contralateral anatomic surgical resections for lung cancer, mostly for metachronous cancers. The first surgical resection was a lobectomy in most cases (45 lobectomies: 81.8%, 9 segmentectomies: 16.4%, and 1 bilobectomy: 1.8%), and a video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) procedure was used in 23 cases (41.8%). The mean interval between the operations was 38 months, and lobectomy was less frequent for the second surgical resection (35 lobectomies: 63.6% and 20 segmentectomies: 36.4%), with VATS procedures performed in 41 cases (74.5%). Ninety-day mortality was 10.9% (n = 6), and 3-year survival was 77%. Risk factor analysis identified the number of resected segments during the second intervention or the total number of resected segments, extent of resection (lobectomy vs. segmentectomy), surgical approach (thoracotomy vs. VATS), tumor stage, and nodal involvement as potential prognostic factors for long-term survival.

CONCLUSION

A second contralateral anatomic surgical resection for multiple primary lung cancer is possible, with a higher early mortality rate, but acceptable long-term survival, and should be indicated for carefully selected patients.

Multiple primary lung cancer: a rising challenge

With the use of high-resolution chest imaging system and lung cancer screening program, patients with multiple primary lung cancers (MPLCs) are becoming a growing population in clinical practice worldwide. The diagnostic criteria for MPLCs has been established and modified by three major lung cancer research institutes. However, due to the fact that the differential diagnosis between MPLCs and a recurrence, metastatic, or satellite lesion arising from the original lesion remains ambiguous and confusing, there is still insufficient evidence to support a uniform guideline. Newly developed molecular and genomic methods have the potential to better define the relationship among multiple lesions and bring the possibility of targeted therapy. Surgical resection remains the first choice for the treatment of MPLCs and detailed strategy should be carefully planned taking characteristics of the tumor and status of patients into consideration. For those who are intolerant to surgery, a new technology called stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is now an optional therapeutic strategy. Furthermore, multiple GGOs are unique MPLCs that need special attentions in the clinical practice.

Metachronous Lung Cancer: Clinical Characteristics and Effects of Surgical Treatment

The occurrence of a second lung tumor after surgical removal of lung cancer usually indicates a lung cancer metastasis, but sometimes a new lesion proves to be a new primary lung cancer, i.e., metachronous lung cancer. The goal of the present study was to conduct a clinical evaluation of patients with metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metastasis, and to compare the early and distant outcomes of surgical treatment in both cancer types. There were 26 age-matched patients with lung cancer metastases and 23 patients with metachronous lung cancers, who underwent a second lung cancer resection. We evaluated the histological type of a resected cancer, the extent of thoracosurgery, the frequency of early postoperative complications, and the probability of 5-year survival after the second operation. The findings were that metachronous lung cancer was adenocarcinoma in 52% of patients, with a different histopathological pattern from that of the primary lung cancer in 74% of patients. In both cancer groups, mechanical resections were the most common surgery type (76% of all cases), with anatomical resections such as segmentectomy, lobectomy, or pneumectomy being much rarer conducted. The incidence of early postoperative complications in metachronous lung cancer and lung cancer metastasis (30% vs. 31%, respectively) and the probability of 5-year survival after resection of either cancer tumor (60.7% vs. 50.9%, respectively) were comparable. In conclusion, patients undergoing primary lung cancer surgery require a long-term follow-up due to the risk of metastatic or metachronous lung cancer. The likelihood of metachronous lung cancer and pulmonary lung cancer metastases, the incidence of postoperative complications, and the probability of 5-year survival after resection of metachronous lung cancer or lung cancer metastasis are similar.