Patients' Experiences of LIving with CANcer-associated thrombosis: the PELICAN study

Risk of Depression after Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Hematological Cancer: A Population-Based Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

 Venous thromboembolism (VTE) may complicate the clinical course of cancer patients and add to their psychological burden.

OBJECTIVES

 We aimed to investigate the association between VTE and risk of subsequent depression in patients with hematological cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

 We conducted a population-based cohort study using Danish national health registries. Between 1995 and 2020, we identified 1,190 patients with hematological cancer and incident VTE diagnosed within 6 months before to 1 year after cancer diagnosis. A comparison cohort of patients with hematological cancer without VTE (n = 5,325) was matched by sex, year of birth, cancer type, and year of cancer diagnosis. Patients were followed until diagnosis of depression, emigration, death, study end (2021), or for a maximum of 3 years. Depression was defined as hospital discharge diagnosis of depression or ≥1 prescription for antidepressants. Absolute risks of depression were computed with cumulative incidence functions, treating death as competing event. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Cox proportional hazards regression models, adjusting for comorbidities.

RESULTS

 Depression was observed in 158 hematological cancer patients with and 585 without VTE. The 3-year absolute risks of depression were 13.3% (95% CI: 11.5-15.3%) in the VTE cancer cohort and 11.1% (95% CI: 10.3-12.0%) in the comparison cancer cohort, corresponding to a risk difference of 2.2% (95% CI: -1.8-6.5%). VTE was associated with an increased relative risk of depression (adjusted HR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.28-1.90).

CONCLUSION

 VTE was associated with an elevated risk of subsequent depression in patients with hematological cancer.

Preventative and curative treatment of venous thromboembolic disease in cancer patients

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) is common in patients with cancer and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The incidence of CAT continues to rise, complicating patient care and burdening healthcare systems. Patients with cancer experiencing VTE face poorer prognoses, making prevention and effective management imperative. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy and acute treatment strategies for CAT. Risk assessment models (e.g., Khorana score) aid in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been shown to reduce the risk of CAT without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding complications. However, implementation of risk-based strategies remains limited in clinical practice. For acute CAT management, LMWHs have been the standard of care, but DOACs are increasingly favored due to their convenience and efficacy. However, challenges persist, including bleeding risks and drug interactions. Emerging therapies targeting Factor XI inhibitors present promising alternatives, potentially addressing current limitations in anticoagulation management for CAT.

TO INFORM OR NOT TO INFORM about venous thromboembolisms - A qualitative study on communication between healthcare professionals and patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of death among cancer patients. Despite this, studies show that patients with cancer feel inadequately informed about the VTE risk and symptoms, which may impede their ability to recognise symptoms and react promptly. Patients with lung cancer are especially vulnerable due to a high relative risk of developing VTE combined with a high prevalence of low health literacy. This study aimed to explore the VTE information needs of lung cancer patients and how patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) communicate about VTE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Data was collected via semi-structured interviews with patients with lung cancer and HCPs. All participants (n = 20) were recruited from an oncological department. The analysis was performed in an inductive manner using a Ricoeur inspired strategy.

FINDINGS

Patients had varying information needs regarding VTE, but HCPs did not routinely communicate about VTE, as the topic tended to be lowly prioritised. HCPs communicated about VTE when patients expressed a need or presented symptoms of VTE. HCPs expressed concerns about adding to patient's emotional burden by informing about VTE, while some patients emphasised the importance of being mentally prepared for potential complications.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the challenging balance HCPs must maintain between adequately communicating about VTE and not causing undue psychological distress. However, given patient's often limited awareness of VTE, the responsibility to initiate communication about VTE must fall on the HCPs.

A qualitative investigation of the experiences of patients living with antiphospholipid antibodies

OBJECTIVE

Substantial morbidity and mortality affect those with antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), yet patient experiences remain poorly understood. This research investigated patient experiences of aPL/APS diagnosis; effects on daily life; and healthcare and treatment.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥18 years with APS per the Revised Sapporo criteria or with ≥1 positive aPL on ≥2 occasions were recruited from a Canadian multidisciplinary APS clinic to participate in semi-structured in-depth interviews. Interviews were conducted virtually and transcribed verbatim for subsequent thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with aPLs/APS participated; 95.2% were female, mean (SD) age was 45.6 (15.0) years. Most (71.4%) had APS, and 71.4% had aPLs/APS with SLE. Results are presented around patient experiences of aPL/APS diagnosis, effects on daily life, and healthcare and treatment. Participants described medical complications/physical symptoms and the healthcare, lifestyle, and emotional impacts experienced around the time of aPLs/APS diagnosis. In addition to the physical and psychosocial impacts of living with aPLs/APS, patients reported modified leisure activities, altered employment trajectories, and positive and negative impacts on relationships. Impacts on family planning were also a critical component of the aPL/APS lived experience; participants shared experiences of miscarriage, other pregnancy complications, and medication-related challenges (e.g., with low-molecular-weight heparin injections). Challenging aspects of aPL/APS healthcare and treatment were also discussed, particularly related to the lifestyle, physical, and emotional burden of medication use. Although a lack of resources was described, participants expressed trust in healthcare providers when making management decisions or when seeking information. Suggestions for resources included the need for additional medication-related information, examples to help contextualize management behaviours, and additional information for those with aPLs/APS without SLE.

CONCLUSION

Patients highlighted how the diverse manifestations of aPLs/APS, accentuated by management-related challenges, impose considerable physical and psychosocial burdens. Results will inform the development of patient resources aligned with patient priorities.

Quality of life in oncological patients with venous thromboembolic disease

Venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) is a significant medical problem in cancer patients, as it is associated with substantial morbidity and increased mortality. Cancer survivors with VTE experience important changes in their health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Over the past few years, HRQOL and its measurement have been incorporated in clinical studies of anticoagulation therapy, as well as in qualitative and quantitative studies for the examination of the impact of VTE in cancer patients. While there are several tools available to assess HRQOL, few are specific to cancer patients and VTE. More importantly, those same tools are yet to be incorporated in routine clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to describe the available tools for the assessment of HRQOL in cancer patients with a focus on VTE, as well as the characteristics of those tools, their strengths, limitations, and potential applicability in clinical practice.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Stage III and IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Nationwide Descriptive Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication in patients starting cancer therapies for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined the risk and timing of VTE in patients with stage IIIA, IIIB to C, and stage IV NSCLC according to received cancer treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nationwide registry-based cohort study of patients recorded in the Danish Lung Cancer Registry (2010-2021) followed for 1 year after entry into the registry to assess the incidence of VTE. The Aalen-Johansen estimator was used to calculate the risk of VTE after treatment commencement with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiation, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.

RESULTS

Among the 3475 patients with stage IIIA, 4047 with stage IIIB to C, and 18,082 patients with stage IV cancer, the 1-year risk of VTE was highest in the first 6 months and varied markedly by cancer stage and cancer treatment. In stage IIIA, VTE risk was highest with chemotherapy (3.9%) and chemoradiation (4.1%). In stage IIIB to C, risks increased with chemotherapy (5.2%), immunotherapy (9.4%), and targeted therapy (6.0%). Stage IV NSCLC showed high risk with targeted therapy (12.5%) and immunotherapy (12.2%). The risk was consistently higher for pulmonary embolism than deep vein thrombosis.

CONCLUSION

VTE risks vary substantially according to cancer treatments and cancer stages. The highest risk was observed in the initial 6 months of therapy initiation. These insights emphasize the need for tailored risk assessment and vigilance in managing VTE complications in patients with NSCLC. Further research is needed to optimize individual thromboprophylaxis strategies for patients with unresectable and metastatic NSCLC.

Unmet needs and barriers in venous thromboembolism education and awareness among people living with cancer: a global survey

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major preventable cause of morbidity, disability, and mortality in subjects with cancer. A global appraisal of cancer-associated VTE education and awareness is not available.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate VTE-related education, awareness, and unmet needs from the perspective of people living with cancer using a quantitative and qualitative approach.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study used data from an online-based survey covering multidimensional domains of cancer-associated VTE. Data are presented descriptively. Potential differences across participant subgroups were explored.

RESULTS

Among 2262 patients with cancer from 42 countries worldwide, 55.3% received no VTE education throughout their cancer journey, and an additional 8.2% received education at the time of VTE diagnosis only, leading to 63.5% receiving no or inappropriately delayed education. When education was delivered, only 67.8% received instructions to seek medical attention in case of VTE suspicion, and 36.9% reported scarce understanding. One-third of participants (32.4%) felt psychologically distressed when becoming aware of the potential risks and implications connected with cancer-associated VTE. Most responders (78.8%) deemed VTE awareness highly relevant, but almost half expressed concerns about the quality of education received. While overall consistent, findings in selected survey domains appeared to numerically differ across age group, ethnicity, continent of residence, educational level, metastatic status, and VTE history.

CONCLUSION

This study involving a large and diverse population of individuals living with cancer identifies important unmet needs in VTE-related education, awareness, and support across healthcare systems globally. These findings unveil multilevel opportunities to expedite patient-centered care in cancer-associated VTE prevention and management.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in patients under palliative care"]

Many patients with cancer require palliative care at some stage and the vast majority of people followed in palliative care are cancer patients. Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this is particularly true during the advanced palliative phase when mobility is limited or absent. Patients with cancer in palliative care are at higher bleeding risk compared to non-cancer patients. Decisions to treat VTE or withhold anticoagulation for these patients have proven to be difficult and depend largely on an individual clinician's judgment. For this reason, we have developed a consensus proposal for appropriate management of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT) in patients in palliative care, which is presented in this article. The proposal was informed by the recent scientific literature retrieved through a systematic literature review. In cancer patients in advanced palliative care, the benefit/risk ratio of anticoagulation seems unfavourable with a higher haemorrhagic risk than the benefit associated with prevention of CAT recurrence and, above all, in the absence of any benefit on quality of life. For this reason, we recommend that patients should be prescribed anticoagulants on a case-by-case basis. The choice of whether to treat, and with which type of treatment, should take into account anticipated life expectancy and patient preferences, as well as clinical factors such as the estimated bleeding risk, the type of VTE experienced and the time since the VTE event.

Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in patients under palliative care

Many patients with cancer require palliative care at some stage and the vast majority of people followed in palliative care are cancer patients. Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this is particularly true during the advanced palliative phase when mobility is limited or absent. Patients with cancer in palliative cancer are at higher bleeding risk compared to non-cancer patients. Decisions to treat VTE or withhold anticoagulation for these patients have proven to be difficult and depend largely on an individual clinician's judgment. For this reason, we have developed a consensus proposal for appropriate management of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT) in patients in palliative care, which is presented in this article. The proposal was informed by the recent scientific literature retrieved through a systematic literature review. In cancer patients in advanced palliative care, the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulation seems unfavourable with a higher haemorrhagic risk than the benefit associated with prevention of CAT recurrence and, above all, in the absence of any benefit on quality of life. For this reason, we recommend that patients should be prescribed anticoagulants on a case-by-case basis. The choice of whether to treat, and with which type of treatment, should take into account anticipated life expectancy and patient preferences, as well as clinical factors such as the estimated bleeding risk, the type of VTE experienced and the time since the VTE event.

Care pathways for patients with cancer-associated thrombosis: From diagnosis to long-term follow-up

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is associated with a high risk of bleeding complications and hospitalisation, as well as with increased mortality. Good practice recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of VTE in patients with cancer have been developed by a number of professional bodies. Although these guidelines provide consistent recommendations on what treatment should be offered to patients presenting with cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT), many questions remain unanswered, in particular about the modalities of management (Who? When? Where?) and, for this reason, we have developed a consensus proposal for an appropriate multidisciplinary care pathway for patients with CAT, which is presented in this article. The proposal was informed by the recent scientific literature retrieved through a systematic literature review. This proposal is centred on the development of a shared care plan individualised to each patient's needs and expectations, patient information and shared decision-making to promote adherence, involvement of all relevant hospital- and community- based healthcare providers in the development and implementation of the care plan, and regular re-evaluation of the treatment strategy.

Measurement of adherence and health-related quality of life during anticoagulation therapy in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE): a multicenter quantitative study

PURPOSE

Therapy for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) includes long-term anticoagulation, which may have substantial impact on the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients. We assessed patient-reported outcomes to characterize the HRQL associated with VTE treatment and to begin to examine those HRQL elements impacting anticoagulation adherence (AA).

METHODS

Participants were adult cancer patients with confirmed symptomatic acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Patients were excluded if there was an indication for anticoagulation other than VTE, ECOG performance status >3, or life expectancy < 3 months. Participants were assessed with a self-reported adherence tool. HRQL was measured with a 6-domain questionnaire using a seven-point Likert scale. Evaluations were performed at 30 days and 3 months after enrollment. For the primary objective, an overall adherence rate was calculated at each time point of evaluation. For the HRQL domains, non-parametric testing was used to compare results between subgroups.

RESULTS

Seventy-four patients were enrolled. AA and HRQL at 30 days and 3 months were assessed in 50 and 36 participants, respectively. At 30 days the AA rate was 90%, and at 3 months it was 83%. In regard to HRQL, patients suffered frequent and moderate-severe distress in the domains of emotional and physical symptoms, sleep disturbance, and limitations to physical activity. An association between emotional or physical distress and AA was observed.

CONCLUSION

Patients with VTE suffer a substantial impairment of their HRQL. Increased emotional distress correlated with better long-term AA. These results can be used to inform additional research aimed at developing novel strategies to improve AA.

Treatment of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Recent Advances, Unmet Needs, and Future Direction

Cancer-associated thrombosis, with the incidence rising over the years, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Recent advances in the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) include the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), which provide a more convenient and effective option than low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Nonetheless, important unmet needs remain including an increased risk of bleeding in certain patient subgroups such as those with gastroesophageal cancer, concerns about drug-drug interactions, and management of patients with severe renal impairment. Although DOACs are more convenient than LMWH, persistence can decline over time. Factor XI inhibitors have potential safety advantages over DOACs because factor XI appears to be essential for thrombosis but not hemostasis. In phase II trials, some factor XI inhibitors were superior to enoxaparin for the prevention of VTE after knee replacement surgery without increasing the risk of bleeding. Ongoing trials are assessing the efficacy and safety of factor XI inhibitors for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE.

Prevalence of Cancer in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: A Retrospective Nationwide Case-Control Study in Sweden

Cancer is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We aimed to define sex-specific risk of preceding cancer in patients with a first-time VTE by conducting a nationwide Swedish registry-based study including 298 172 patients with VTE and 1 185 079 matched controls. This included 44 685 patients with a diagnosis of cancer at/or within 1 year before a VTE diagnosis. Female patients with VTE had a higher multivariable adjusted odds ratios of preceding cancer than male patients with VTE (5.5 [99% confidence interval 5.4-5.7] vs 3.9 [3.8-4.0]). The highest risk of cancer in patients with VTE were found for pancreatic cancer (women: 19.6 [15.8-24.4]; men: 17.2 [13.7-21.6]) and brain cancer (women: 17.4 [12.9-23.4]; men: 17.5 [13.8-22.2]). Weak associations were seen between VTE and bladder/urothelial cancer (women: 1.31 [1.12-1.53]; men: 1.34 [1.23-1.47]), prostate cancer (men: 2.17 [2.07-2.27]), malignant melanoma (women: 2.51 [2.07-3.05]; men: 2.67 [2.23-3.18]), and kidney cancer (women: 3.20 [2.49-4.11]; men: 3.33 [2.79-4.07]). In conclusion, associations with VTE were weak for bladder/urothelial cancer and kidney cancer, and strong for pancreatic, brain, and biliary cancers.

Awareness of venous thromboembolism among patients with cancer: Preliminary findings from a global initiative for World Thrombosis Day

BACKGROUND

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAT) has detrimental impact on patients' clinical outcomes and quality of life. Data on CAT education, communication, and awareness among the general cancer population are scanty.

METHODS

We present the preliminary results of an ongoing patient-centered survey including 27 items covering major spheres of CAT. The survey, available in 14 languages, was promoted and disseminated online through social networks, email newsletters, websites, and media.

RESULTS

As of September 20, 2022, 749 participants from 27 countries completed the survey. Overall, 61.8% (n = 460) of responders were not aware of their risk of CAT. Among those who received information on CAT, 26.2% (n = 56) were informed only at the time of CAT diagnosis. Over two thirds (69.1%, n = 501) of participants received no education on signs and symptoms of venous thromboembolism (VTE); among those who were educated about the possible clinical manifestations, 58.9% (n = 119) were given instructions to seek consultation in case of VTE suspicion. Two hundred twenty-four respondents (30.9%) had a chance to discuss the potential use of primary thromboprophylaxis with health-care providers. Just over half (58.7%, n = 309) were unaware of the risks of bleeding associated with anticoagulation, despite being involved in anticoagulant-related discussions or exposed to anticoagulants. Most responders (85%, n = 612) valued receiving CAT education as highly relevant; however, 51.7% (n = 375) expressed concerns about insufficient time spent and clarity of education received.

CONCLUSIONS

This ongoing survey involving cancer patients with diverse ethnic, cultural, and geographical backgrounds highlights important patient knowledge gaps. These findings warrant urgent interventions to improve education and awareness, and reduce CAT burden.

Cancer patients' experiences of the diagnosis and treatment of incidental pulmonary embolism (a qualitative study)

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of symptomatic cancer-associated thrombosis often causes distress and alarm for patients, especially for those unaware of the risk, or the signs and symptoms to look out for. There are few data about cancer patients' experiences of incidentally diagnosed pulmonary embolism (IPE), where lack of warning (recognised signs, symptoms) may cause delayed diagnosis and aggravate distress.

OBJECTIVES

To explore cancer patients' experience of the diagnosis of and living with incidental pulmonary embolism treated with anticoagulation.

METHODS

A qualitative study using modified grounded theory approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted as part of a mixed- methods prospective observational survey study of consenting patients with IPE. Data were subjected to thematic analysis. The qualitative findings are presented.

FINDINGS

Eleven participants were interviewed (mean age 68.3 years, range 38-82 years; various forms of cancer and stages). Three major themes and one cross-cutting theme were generated. Theme (1): IPE is experienced in the context of cancer and concomitant comorbidities. Issues are understood in the shadow of-and often overshadowed by-current serious illness. Theme (2): Being diagnosed with IPE. Misattribution to cancer or other comorbidities caused delay in help-seeking and diagnosis. Theme (3): Coping with anticoagulation. Participants' incorporated anticoagulation treatment and its effects into their daily routine with acceptance and stoicism. Finally, the cross-cutting theme relates to a lack of information and uncertainty, contributing to distress throughout the experience.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of IPE was upsetting and unexpected. Expert and timely information was valued by those with IPE. Education called for about the increased risk of cancer-associated thrombosis and the signs and symptoms to be aware of.

Evaluation of patients' experience and related qualitative outcomes in venous thromboembolism: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a prevalent disease with high morbidity and mortality. VTE has well-documented physical sequelae; however, the psychological and emotional impacts are seldom evaluated in randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a scoping review of published qualitative studies aiming to understand the physical, psychological, and emotional impact of VTE as reflected from patients' perspectives. This scoping review is part of a larger initiative to develop a core outcome set for VTE treatment studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted to identify qualitative studies assessing patient experience of VTE. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts using Covidence systematic review software. Full-text reviews were conducted independently by 2 study team members. A modified method of "thematic synthesis" was used to collate themes upon reading and rereading of the publications.

RESULTS

Our search strategy returned a total of 4944 citations; 28 were ultimately included in the analysis. The studies were conducted across 13 countries and representative of 436 participants including a spectrum of VTE subpopulations. There were seven major themes identified: Acute impacts: an unforeseen blow, Sustained psychological distress, Loss of self: life is changed, Challenges of thrombosis management, Balancing coping and control, Negative experience with the medical system, and VTE in the context of other conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The physical, psychological, and emotional impacts of VTE extend beyond objective outcomes typically evaluated in clinical trials. An improved understanding of the outcomes most important to patients will improve patient-centered care in VTE.

Primary ambulatory thromboprophylaxis in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving chemotherapy: hope or hype?

Thrombosis is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients. Patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) have a very high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Even though primary ambulatory thromboprophylaxis (PATP) could decrease this risk, there are uncertain issues with regard to the choice and dose of anticoagulants, duration of anticoagulant therapy, and patient selection criteria. In addition, the current practice guidelines on PATP in PC patients are equivocal. This review critically appraises the evidence on the use of PATP in PC patients receiving chemotherapy.

New Oral Anticoagulants Open New Horizons for Cancer Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, decreased quality of life, and higher economic burden in patients with cancer. Currently, the treatment of VTE in patients with cancer is particularly challenging. For many years, low molecular weight heparin (LMWHs) has been the standard for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE. Recently, the introduction of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may offer an oral anticoagulant option for some patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) as a growing body of literature supports the use of NOACs in the setting of CAT. With the use of NOAC as a new option in the management of CAT, clinicians now face several choices for the individual cancer patient with VTE. We need a more in-depth understanding of the drug properties, efficacy and safety, economic analysis that allows us to choose the most appropriate treatment for each patient. In the review, we will present an overview of CAT management, discuss the available evidence, economic costs for NOACs in the treatment of CAT, and seek to provide the best range of treatments for cancer patients.

How well do European patients understand cancer-associated thrombosis? A patient survey

Ongoing concerns regarding the morbidity and mortality from cancer-associated thrombosis led the European Cancer Patient Coalition (ECPC), the voice of cancer patients across Europe, to create a pan-European cancer-associated awareness patient survey to assess cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) knowledge among a large population of patients with cancer. The ECPC survey represents the largest of its kind among patients/caregivers with CAT. It identified significant gaps in patient awareness and knowledge of CAT as well as a need for educational CAT-related discussions and interventions between healthcare professionals and patients with cancer and their caregivers. The aim of this paper is to highlight these gaps and to provide awareness of what/when information should be shared with patients/caregivers. Notably, the importance of providing information on how to reduce their risk of CAT, the role of anticoagulant prophylaxis and treatment (short- and long-term) including possible side-effects, and finally how to identify CAT symptoms early. Here we outline what type of information should be provided, as well as when and how to best discuss CAT with our oncology patients and their caregivers along the cancer care continuum, to reduce the risk of CAT and associated complications with a goal of improving patient outcomes.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism

Cancer-associated thrombosis (including venous thromboembolism (VTE) and arterial events) is highly consequential for patients with cancer and is associated with worsened survival. Despite substantial improvements in cancer treatment, the risk of VTE has increased in recent years; VTE rates additionally depend on the type of cancer (with pancreas, stomach and primary brain tumours having the highest risk) as well as on individual patient's and cancer treatment factors. Multiple cancer-specific mechanisms of VTE have been identified and can be classified as mechanisms in which the tumour expresses proteins that alter host systems, such as levels of platelets and leukocytes, and in which the tumour expresses procoagulant proteins released into the circulation that directly activate the coagulation cascade or platelets, such as tissue factor and podoplanin, respectively. As signs and symptoms of VTE may be non-specific, diagnosis requires clinical assessment, evaluation of pre-test probability, and objective diagnostic testing with ultrasonography or CT. Risk assessment tools have been validated to identify patients at risk of VTE. Primary prevention of VTE (thromboprophylaxis) has long been recommended in the inpatient and post-surgical settings, and is now an option in the outpatient setting for individuals with high-risk cancer. Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of therapy, with low molecular weight heparin or newer options such as direct oral anticoagulants. Personalized treatment incorporating risk of bleeding and patient preferences is essential, especially as a diagnosis of VTE is often considered by patients even more distressing than their cancer diagnosis, and can severely affect the quality of life. Future research should focus on current knowledge gaps including optimizing risk assessment tools, biomarker discovery, next-generation anticoagulant development and implementation science.

Venous Thromboembolism In Cancer Patients: "From Evidence to Care"

This article seeks to review the current status of treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease (VTE) in cancer patients after the addition of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to the therapeutic arsenal available. The suitability of DOAC use in complex clinical situations, poorly represented in clinical trials, is controversial and difficult for care activity, making the recommendations in clinical practice guidelines the focus of special attention in this area. Recently, several randomized trials have compared low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) to DOAC for the management of CAT. Potential drug interactions with DOACs or the increased risk of bleeding in intraluminal tumors require special precautions, as do metastatic or primary brain disease and comorbid conditions, such as renal or liver failure, which are not suitably represented in pivotal studies. Furthermore, few data are available for situations involving elevated bleeding risk, with thrombocytopenia levels below the inclusion criterion of clinical trials, or recurrence during active anticoagulant therapy. Similarly, it is less clear that patients and physicians accept the presumption that oral DOAC administration is more convenient than subcutaneous LMWH, particularly when drug absorption may be compromised. The non-inclusion or under-representation of patients at higher risk for complications with anticoagulation in randomized clinical trials, makes their use complex in certain situations in health care. This paper provides a practical review of current clinical guideline recommendations regarding LMWH and/ or DOAC to treat and prevent CAT, as well as the most controversial clinical conditions for their use.

Importance de la thromboembolie veineuse liée au cancer : Premier article de la série « Prévenir la thrombose »

Dans la documentation sur les soins infirmiers en oncologie, les besoins d’apprentissage des patients atteints de cancer sont largement étudiés et les publications abondent; toutefois, on tient rarement compte de la nécessité d’y inclure la thrombose associée au cancer (Cancer-Associated Thrombosis, ou CAT en anglais).

Les patients cancéreux ont peu d’information sur la thromboembolie veineuse (TEV) et son lien avec le cancer (Aggarwal et al., 2015 ). En 2015, une étude qualitative menée par le Dr Simon Noble a révélé que les patients cancéreux sous chimiothérapie à risque élevé en savaient davantage sur la neutropénie fébrile que sur les signes et symptômes de la thromboembolie veineuse, malgré le risque plus élevé de la seconde dans l’absolu. Chose préoccupante puisque la thrombose associée au cancer est la première cause de décès des patients sous chimiothérapie. En général, les patients et leur famille, mais aussi les fournisseurs de soins de santé, sont peu informés sur la thrombose associée au cancer. La recherche indique que beaucoup de patients en ayant reçu un diagnostic ont eu l’impression que leur médecin traitant manquait de connaissances sur le sujet puisqu’il avait considéré d’autres diagnostics avant de poser celui de la thrombose, et ce, malgré l’apparition de signes et la présence des symptômes classiques de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse (Noble et al., 2015 ).

Survenant fréquemment, la thromboembolie veineuse est une complication grave chez les patients cancéreux : c’est en fait la première cause de morbidité et la deuxième cause de mortalité pour eux (Noble et al., 2015 ). Malgré son importance, les patients, les proches aidants et les fournisseurs de soins de santé en savent peu sur la thrombose associée au cancer. Le présent article est le premier d’une série intitulée « Prévenir la thrombose » qui vise à sensibiliser les infirmières en oncologie afin d’améliorer l’enseignement aux patients sur cet important sujet.

The significance of VTE in cancer: Introduction of the 'Spot the CLOT' series

Learning needs of patients with cancer have been examined and published widely in oncology nursing literature. However, the topic of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is rarely considered a necessary inclusion. Awareness by individuals with cancer about venous thromboembolism (VTE) and its association with cancer is low (Aggarwal et al., 2015). A 2015 qualitative study by Dr. Simon Noble revealed that high-risk cancer patients receiving active chemotherapy knew more about febrile neutropenia than signs and symptoms of VTE, despite a higher absolute risk of VTE. This is concerning given that CAT is the number one cause of death for patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment. Awareness of CAT is generally low not only in patients and their families, but also in healthcare providers. Research has found that many patients diagnosed with CAT perceived a significant knowledge deficit in their treating physicians because alternative diagnoses were considered before CAT, despite classic signs and symptoms of VTE (Noble et al., 2015). VTE is a common and often severe complication in cancer patients, being the leading cause of morbidity and second leading cause of mortality (Noble et al., 2015). Despite its significance, however, the awareness of CAT is low in patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. This article is the first in a series entitled, 'Spot the CLOT', which is aimed at promoting the awareness of CAT in oncology nurses with the goal of improving patient education on this important topic.

Patient education program at the forefront of cancer-associated thrombosis care

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) requires specific approaches, although it is well codified in most cases. Current national and international (International Initiative on Cancer and Thrombosis, ITAC) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) recommend the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) over 6 months as first treatment option, and anticoagulation should be maintained thereafter as long as cancer is active. Since compliance improves when patients understand their disease and related treatments, we created a dedicated patient education program (PEP) for CAT, aiming to improve quality of care.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients who voluntarily joined the PEP for CAT from 2014 to 2020.

RESULTS

In total, 182 cancer patients (median age, 64.9 years) were included, 53.3% with metastatic disease. A total of 528 PEP sessions (median, 3 per patient) were delivered. After PEP completion, the rate of self-injections or those performed at home by a relative had increased from 49.1% to 59.8% (P=0.05). Quality of life had improved significantly (P=0.025) and 90.0% of patients reported adhering to anticoagulant therapy.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a structured and personalized PEP for CAT is feasible, allowing to improve cancer patient empowerment, adherence to CAT treatment and quality of life. The Groupe francophone et cancer (GFTC) members aim at facilitating access to CAT-PEP for both patients and caregivers and use of the multi-language ITAC-CPG mobile app (free access: www.itaccme.com) to improve the care and quality of life of patients with CAT.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program for the management of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Treatment of Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in cancer patients is challenging due to higher risk of VTE recurrence or bleeding under anticoagulants. We assessed the effectiveness of a dedicated "Allo-Thrombosis Cancer" multidisciplinary care program (AlloTC-MCP) that incorporated individualized care, regular follow-ups, telephone counselling, and a patient education program.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From September 2017 to October 2019, 100 consecutive cancer patients with new VTE onset were enrolled in this observational single-center prospective pilot study and received standard (control group, n = first 50 patients enrolled) or AlloTC-MCP care (n = next 50 patients enrolled) over a 6-month VTE treatment follow-up period. Primary end-point was the percentage of adherence to the International Clinical Practice Guidelines (ITAC-CPGs) at 6 (M6) month follow-up.

RESULTS

Among the 100 patients with different cancer types (22% genitourinary, 19% breast, 16% gastrointestinal, 15% lymphoma, 11% lung and 17% others), 51 patients (61%) had metastatic disease and 31 (31%) received chemotherapy alone. Main baseline cancer and VTE clinical characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups. Adherence rates to ITAC-CPGs was significantly higher in the AlloTC-MCP group (100% (M0), 72% (M3) and 68% (M6)) compared with the control group (84% (M0), 8% (M3) and 16% (M6)). Quality of Life (QoL) was significantly improved in the AlloTC-MCP group 6 months after inclusion.

CONCLUSION

The "AlloTC-MCP" was associated with improved adherence to ITAC-CPGs and merits further expansion.

A mixed-methods study to evaluate a patient-designed tool to reduce harm from cancer-associated thrombosis: The EMPOWER study

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and serious complication of systemic anticancer therapies. Delays in presentation increase risk of death or long-term morbidity.

BACKGROUND

A patient charity developed an information video for patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy including what to do if they developed symptoms of VTE. This was introduced into clinical practice in a regional cancer center and its impact compared with a district general hospital where the video was not used.

METHODS

A mixed-methods approach was used, comprising clinical audit data, patient surveys, and key informant interviews. The time between development of VTE symptoms and seeking medical evaluation was routinely recorded on patients attending a regional cancer-associated thrombosis service with systemic anticancer therapy-provoked VTE. The video was then embedded into clinical practice at the regional cancer center for 3 months. The primary outcome was the difference in time to presentation with VTE symptoms, between patients attending the regional cancer center and the district general hospital (which acted as control). Other outcomes included impact on radiology resources, patient knowledge, and perspectives of chemotherapy nurses.

RESULTS

Addition of the video was associated with a lower mean time to presentation from 8.9 to 2.9 days (0.33 hazard ratio; 95% confidence interval, 4.5-7.4; P < .0001). This may reflect greater awareness of VTE, resulting in earlier clinical presentation when they developed attributable symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The video was associated with reduced delays in diagnosis of systemic anticancer therapy-associated VTE by 6 days, thereby reducing long-term complications.

The timing of venous thromboembolism in ovarian cancer patients: A nationwide Danish cohort study

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with excess mortality and morbidity in cancer, and is influenced by patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors. We aimed to investigate the impact of such factors in a national cohort of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

Patients in the Danish Gynecologic Cancer Database (DGCD) with EOC from 2005 to 2014 were followed from time of diagnosis to VTE, or censoring. Surgery, chemotherapy, and vascular epithelial growth factor (VEGF)-inhibitors were included as time-varying exposures in Cox proportional hazard regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 551 VTE events were registered in 4991 EOC patients. Median follow-up time was 2.9 years. The 2-year cumulative incidence of VTE was 7.2%. Patients were at highest risk during the first year after EOC diagnosis. Previous VTE was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 3.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.42-4.39). Exposure to major pelvic surgery was associated with a HR of 3.21 (95% CI 2.29-4.50). Exposure to chemotherapy or (VEGF)-inhibitors were associated with HRs of 1.91 (95% CI 1.56-2.33) and 1.05 (95% CI 0.57-1.93), respectively. Hazard ratios for patients with clear cell histopathology was 1.46 (95% CI 0.97-2.20) and 2.42 for International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage III--IV (95% CI 1.93-3.03).

CONCLUSIONS

EOC is associated with a high risk of VTE, particularly within the first year after diagnosis. Major pelvic surgery and chemotherapy were strongly associated with VTE. Person-related risk factors were increasing age and previous VTE. Advanced stage was an independent tumor-related risk factor. These findings support the indication for thrombosis prophylaxis during chemotherapy.

Management of Cancer-Associated Venous Thrombosis: A Nationwide Survey among Danish Oncologists

Background  Treatment patterns for cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT) has been shown to be nonconsistent with contemporary guideline recommendations, resulting in poor patient outcomes. Objectives  The study aimed to describe contemporary CAT management in Danish oncology departments and identify knowledge gaps and inconsistencies between guidelines and clinical practice. Patients and Methods  A survey questionnaire in Danish was developed based on contemporary national guidelines. Using an open recruitment strategy, invitations to participate in the electronic survey were sent to physicians employed at oncology departments in Denmark in winter of 2018/2019. The questionnaire was based on current national guidelines and included 10 items with multiple choices and a free-text option to specify or comment. The questionnaire was pilot-tested by a junior and senior oncologist. Results  A total of 142 physicians completed the survey, representing all Danish geographical regions and various seniority. The majority reported that CAT was treated and followed up in oncology departments. However, 36.6% of the physicians were unaware of the existence of designated cancer thrombosis guidelines. Risk of venous thrombosis was generally assessed without diagnostic scores. Almost all (98.6%) reported low-molecular-weight heparin to be first-line treatment for CAT. Treatment duration seemed wrongly influenced by subtype of venous thrombosis, and 44.5% responded that thromboprophylaxis among hospitalized patients was substantially underused. Conclusion  The variability in the daily clinical management of CAT demonstrated through this survey indicates a potential to increase awareness of available guidelines, standardized use of inpatient thromboprophylaxis, and organized treatment and follow-up in a multidisciplinary setting, which would potentially improve management of CAT in Denmark.

Direct oral anticoagulants and cancer-associated VTE: good for all, or just some?

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with significant mortality and morbidity in patients with cancer. Therefore, tailoring anticoagulation is of utmost importance to decrease the risk of recurrent VTE while minimizing the risk of bleeding. Direct oral anticoagulants have been recently compared with low-molecular-weight heparin for the management of acute cancer-associated thrombosis. Although direct oral anticoagulants are a welcome addition, clinicians need to incorporate clinical characteristics, drug-drug interactions, and patient preference in decision making.

American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among patients with cancer. Patients with cancer and VTE are at a markedly increased risk for morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in their decisions about the prevention and treatment of VTE in patients with cancer.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The guideline development process was supported by updated or new systematic evidence reviews. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

Recommendations address mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients with cancer, those undergoing a surgical procedure, and ambulatory patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. The recommendations also address the use of anticoagulation for the initial, short-term, and long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong recommendations include not using thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients receiving cancer chemotherapy at low risk of VTE and to use low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for initial treatment of VTE in patients with cancer. Conditional recommendations include using thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical patients with cancer, LMWH or fondaparinux for surgical patients with cancer, LMWH or direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in ambulatory patients with cancer receiving systemic therapy at high risk of VTE and LMWH or DOAC for initial treatment of VTE, DOAC for the short-term treatment of VTE, and LMWH or DOAC for the long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer.

Treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: The evolution of anticoagulant choice and clinical insights into practical management

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) therapy is recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) and extended therapy is recommended in those with active cancer to prevent recurrent thrombosis. However, the inconvenience of daily subcutaneous injections and the cost of LMWH therapy hinder long-term use. Observational data demonstrate that persistence with LMWH therapy is low in clinical practice and that many patients are switched to oral alternatives - namely VKAs and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Recently, the efficacy and safety of apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban versus LMWH therapy for the treatment of CAT have been demonstrated in randomized trials. This review provides a critical evaluation of studies with DOACs in this setting and an update on the guidance regarding anticoagulant use for the treatment of CAT. In recognition of the heterogeneity of patients with cancer and the challenges of CAT, patient cases with expert clinical perspectives are presented.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism and the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a review of clinical outcomes and patient perspectives

INTRODUCTION

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism remains an important but challenging aspect in the treatment of patients with cancer. Recently, alternatives to injection of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) have been introduced, the non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which could potentially alleviate patients from burdensome daily injections.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the available evidence exploring the role of NOACs in the treatment and secondary prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism, from randomized trials, observational data, contemporary guideline recommendations, and patient perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and apixaban have proven attractive alternatives to LMWH for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism. Contemporary guidelines have promptly endorsed the use of NOACs in patients with most cancer types. Nonetheless, issues remain regarding bleeding risk, interactions with medical cancer treatment, and the effectiveness and safety for extended treatment periods. There are head-to-head comparisons of the NOACs, and therefore no data favoring the use of one NOAC over the others. Patient's preferences are highly diverse and should be part of routine considerations when weighing risks and benefits associated with various available anticoagulant drugs.

Patients experience of living with cancer associated thrombosis in France (Le PELICAN)

INTRODUCTION

Previous research in the United Kingdom and Spain has identified several areas of unmet clinical and support need for cancer patients diagnosed with cancer associated thrombosis (CAT). These included lack of information, which was directly associated with distress. Appropriate information has been shown to improve tolerance and compliance with self-injecting low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). It is not known whether such experiences are restricted to those particular countries healthcare systems and/or cultures.

METHODS

Purposive sampling of patients with CAT were recruited from an academic hospital in Colombes, France. Semi structured interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Transcripts were coded using Invivo software. Analysis was undertaken using framework analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty four patients participated. Three major themes with associated subthemes were identified: Patients received minimal information regarding risks of CAT or how to treat it once diagnosed. However, this was not associated with distress. Patients adopted a passive role whereby the doctor was always right. They were intolerant injections and found it inconvenient to await community nurses.

CONCLUSION

The doctor patient relationship in France differs from other countries, with patients adopting a passive role with respect to information requirements. This dynamic appears to be a "two edged sword" whereby distress around CAT was minimal yet a lack of knowledge impacted on acceptability of LMWH. This has implications for the choice of anticoagulant particularly now that the DOACS have been evaluated for this indication.

Latest advances in preventing thromboembolic disease in the ambulatory oncology patient

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is often cited as a major cause of death and morbidity in cancer patients. Even a non-lethal VTE causes distress and is commonly perceived by patients as a set-back in the cancer journey and a threat to the cancer treatment. It is also known that the risk of VTE varies between cancers (cancer-related risk factors), between patients (patient-related risk factors), and also within the cancer journey of a single patient. Risk can increase during treatments like surgery and chemotherapy and decline during remission. Neither the low molecular weight heparins nor the vitamin K analogues have gained an established role in thromboprevention guidance other than in 'the high risk' patient, who remains a rather ambiguous entity. The recently published randomised studies of rivaroxaban and apixaban in moderate- to high-risk thrombosis patients, assigned by the Khorana Risk Score, has seen the inclusion of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in recent guidelines (e.g. the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2019 guidelines) for this indication. The ease of administration and the demonstrated greater patient adherence to oral agents has heightened the expectation that a practice-changing thromboprevention study in cancer patients should be realizable. However, key unmet needs that pose familiar challenges remain and as yet do not have satisfactory solutions. Anticoagulants carry risks of bleeding that are higher in the cancer population. There is therefore the challenge of sufficient risk reduction of VTE from the intervention balanced against the number of patients that may be harmed from bleeding. There is also the challenge of penetrating the risk threshold beyond which oncologists would deem thromboprevention a clinically meaningful praxis. Thus, identifying the high-risk groups of patients or targeting the length or timing of the thromboprevention to when the risks are highest are major questions that remain the subject of ongoing research. Notably all this is taking place against a backdrop of changing therapeutics for many cancers (e.g. targeted agents, checkpoint inhibitors and combinations) and their assorted impact on VTE incidence. In this review, past data for the ambulatory cancer patient are summarised, the latest evidence for the direct oral anticoagulants apixaban and rivaroxaban are analysed and the challenges of identifying the high-risk patients that have the greater chance of benefiting from thromboprophylaxis are discussed.

Debate: Thromboprophylaxis should be considered in all patients with cancer - Yes

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication among patients with cancer that is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and health care costs. There is a significant lack of awareness among health care providers and patients leading to delays in seeking medical attention or diagnosis when signs and symptoms of suspected VTE occur as well as underappreciation of potential benefits of different thromboprophylaxis options. Clinical prediction rules (e.g. Khorana risk score) can be used by clinicians to stratify patients according to their underlying risk of VTE. Low-molecular-weight-heparin and direct oral anticoagulants (rivaroxaban and apixaban) have been shown to be safe and effective thromboprophylactic options in this patient population. Health care providers should educate all patients regarding VTE and consider thromboprophylaxis in patients at higher risk of VTE complications. Decisions about thromboprophylaxis should be made with the patients and include a discussion about relative benefits and harms, costs and duration.

Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients on Simultaneous and Palliative Care

Simultaneous care represents the ideal integration between early supportive and palliative care in cancer patients under active antineoplastic treatment. Cancer patients require a composite clinical, social and psychological management that can be effective only if care continuity from hospital to home is guaranteed and if such a care takes place early in the course of the disease, combining standard oncology care and palliative care. In these settings, venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a difficult medical challenge, for the requirement of acute treatments and for the strong impact on anticancer therapies that might be delayed or, even, totally discontinued. Moreover, cancer patients not only display high rates of VTE occurrence/recurrence but are also more prone to bleeding and this forces clinicians to optimize treatment strategies, balancing between hemorrhages and thrombus formation. VTE prevention is, therefore, regarded as a double-edged sword. Indeed, while on one hand the appropriate use of antithrombotic agents can reduce VTE occurrence, on the other it significantly increases the bleeding risk, especially in the frail patients who present with multiple co-morbidities and poly-therapy that can interact with anticoagulant drugs. For these reasons, thromboprophylaxis should start while active cancer treatment is ongoing, according to a simultaneous care model in a patient-centered perspective.

Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism After Second Cancer

Background

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious, yet preventable, complication in cancer. Some patients are diagnosed with a second cancer; however, little is known about the epidemiology of VTE in this population.

Methods

From Danish national healthcare registries, we studied all patients diagnosed with a first breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer from 1995 to 2015. We estimated incidence rates (IRs) of VTE according to the timing of the diagnosis of a second cancer. We controlled for confounder variables in Poisson regression models.

Results

In total, 309,077 patients with a first breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer were included in the study. A second cancer was diagnosed in 20,090 (6.5%) of these patients. In total, 11,908 VTEs were observed in the study period, 786 of these occurred after a diagnosis of second cancer. Second cancer types such as pancreas and stomach cancer were associated with fivefold higher IRs of VTE compared with second cancer types such as breast and prostate cancer. The IR of VTE was highest within the first 6 months after the second cancer was diagnosed (IR 40.5 per 1000 person-years, 95% CI 36.3–42.2) with no differences based on how long since the first cancer it was diagnosed.

Conclusion

The epidemiology of VTE after a second cancer is similar to the epidemiology of VTE after a first cancer with higher rates within the first months after aggressive second cancer types.