Safety, tolerability, and risks associated with first- and second-generation antipsychotics: a state-of-the-art clinical review

Incremental healthcare costs among patients experiencing adverse events on oral antipsychotics: a real-world analysis of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Continuous antipsychotic treatment is fundamental to successful management of schizophrenia. However, many oral antipsychotics are associated with adverse effects (AEs). While prior research has shown antipsychotic AEs to negatively impact patient adherence, no study has examined the incremental costs associated with AEs, especially among Medicare beneficiaries who constitute approximately half of all patients with schizophrenia in the U.S. This study aimed to compare incremental healthcare costs among Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia treated with oral antipsychotics who did and did not experience adverse events (AEs).

METHODS

All fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia who initiated a new OAP between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2019 were included in the sample (index date = date of new OAP prescription). All-cause and schizophrenia-related costs were measured while a patient was receiving treatment and were converted into monthly measures given differential follow-up periods. Generalized linear models were used to generate adjusted cost estimates.

RESULTS

In our final sample of 46,452 Medicare beneficiaries with schizophrenia, movement disorders such as tardive dyskinesia and extrapyramidal symptoms were observed in 10.0% of beneficiaries. Metabolic side effects included hyperlipidemia (33.6%), diabetes (33.1%), and hypotension (6.8%). Patients who experienced adverse events consistently had significantly higher all-cause monthly healthcare costs compared to patients who did not experience adverse events. This was true for beneficiaries experiencing movement disorders ($5,281 vs. $4,851, Δ = $430, p = 0.0766), hyperlipidemia ($5,123 vs. $4,768, Δ = $355, p = 0.0179), diabetes ($5,249 vs. $4,698, Δ = $551, p = 0.0049), and hypotension ($6,631 vs. $4,685, Δ = $1,946, p < 0.001). A similar pattern was observed for monthly schizophrenia-related costs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the additional healthcare cost burden associated with adverse events in patients receiving oral antipsychotic treatment. Efforts should be directed towards selecting agents that minimize side effects and/or developing new therapeutic alternatives with improved tolerability profiles.

Letter to the FDA Proposing Major Changes in the US Clozapine Package Insert Supported by Clozapine Experts Worldwide. Part II: A Review of Fatal Outcomes in US Pharmacovigilance Data and Proposed Changes

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND

This is the second part of a 2-part article that proposes improving the United States (US) clozapine package insert. Part II focuses on fatal outcomes and the 5 boxed warnings, 4 specifically for clozapine: severe neutropenia, seizure, orthostatic hypotension and myocarditis, and 1 for all antipsychotics (elderly with dementia).

METHODS

US reports to the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database were analyzed from clozapine's introduction to January 15, 2023.

FINDINGS/RESULTS

The US was the top reporter worldwide for clozapine with 56,003 reports and 9587 associated fatal outcomes. The 4 clozapine boxed warnings were associated with 534 fatal outcomes (218 with severe neutropenia, 131 with seizures, 125 with orthostasis, 36 with myocarditis, 24 with cardiomyopathy, and 0 with mitral valve prolapse). With no boxed warnings, pneumonia was associated with 674 fatal outcomes and increased white blood cell count (a sign of infection) with 596 fatal outcomes. After considering overlaps, pneumonia and increases in white blood cell count explained 900 fatalities, or 9.4% of 9587 fatal outcomes. The Food and Drug Administration continues to focus on severe neutropenia which was associated with only 218 or 2.3% of fatal outcomes, whereas 97.7% of fatal outcomes reported in US clozapine-treated patients had another cause.

IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS

To help prevent future deaths in clozapine-treated patients, the clozapine package insert should focus on fatal outcomes during infections. Part II offers detailed solutions regarding current boxed warnings and lack of a warning for pneumonia and other infections. The Supplementary Material includes letters of support from 124 non-US clozapine experts from 44 countries/regions who support Parts I and II.

The augmentative efficacy of second-generation anti-psychotics (SGA) to anti-depressants in treating treatment-resistant depression: a network meta-regression analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the augmentative efficacy of second-generation anti-psychotics (SGA) to anti-depressants in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) adjusting follow-up period and explore the underlying"time window"effects of the regimens.

METHODS

Databases included Embase, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library and Google Scholars as well as Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to May 15, 2024, for relevant randomized controlled studies (RCTs) were retrieved. The primary endpoint was Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). The secondary endpoint was MADRS response rate. The tertiary endpoints were Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S) and MADRS remission rate. Standard mean difference (SMD) and hazard ratio (HR) were generated by Bayesian network meta-regression (NMR) for pairwise comparisons on dichotomous and consecutive variants, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 23 studies (N = 10679) with 24 augmentation agents were included in the NMR. For the primary endpoint, compared with ADT, aripiprazole 3 - 12 mg/d, brexpiprazole 1 - 3 mg/d, cariprazine 1.5 - 3 mg/d, olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d and fluoxetine 25 - 50 mg/d combination, and quetiapine XR were significantly effective (SMD ranged from - 0.28 to - 0.114) and their effect sizes were comparable, after adjusting follow-up period, the results resembled the former except for quetiapine XR (SMD = - 0.10, 95%CI: - 0.212 to 0.014). Brexpiprazole 3 mg/d (7.22 weeks), cariprazine 1 - 2 mg/d (2.97 weeks), cariprazine 2-4.5 mg/d (2.81 weeks), cariprazine 3 mg/d (7.16 weeks), olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d (4.11 weeks) and quetiapine 150 - 300 mg/d (3.89 weeks) showed"time window". For the secondary endpoint, brexpiprazole 3 mg/d and rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d was evidently superior to all others (HR ranged from 1.748 to 2.301). For the tertiary endpoints, as for CGI-S, aripiprazole 2 - 20 mg/d, brexpiprazole 2 - 3 mg/d, cariprazine 3 mg/d, olanzapine 6 - 12 mg/d and fluoxetine 25 - 50 mg/d combination, and rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d were conspicuously effective compared with ADT (SMD ranged from - 0.438 to - 0.126) and for MADRS remission rate, aripiprazole 2 - 20 mg/d, brexpiprazole 3 mg/d, cariprazine 3 mg/d, rispridone 0.5 - 3 mg/d were conspicuously effective compared with ADT (HR ranged from 0.477 to 3.326).

CONCLUSION

Holistically considering each endpoint and corresponding "time window", certain SGAs appeared to be efficient augmentation to anti-depressants for TRD, but aripiprazole was relatively more effective and better tolerated.

Novel pharmaceutical treatment approaches for schizophrenia: a systematic literature review

PURPOSE

Schizophrenia is a chronic and debilitating neuropsychiatric disorder affecting approximately 1% of the global population. Traditional antipsychotic treatments, while effective for positive symptoms, often have significant side effects and fail to address cognitive and negative symptoms. Novel pharmacological treatments targeting muscarinic receptors, TAAR1 agonists, serotonergic pathways, and glutamate modulation have emerged as promising alternatives.

AIM

This systematic literature review aims to critically evaluate the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of novel pharmacological agents in the treatment of schizophrenia.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and clinical trials published between April 2014 and March 2024. Studies evaluating novel treatments targeting muscarinic receptors, TAAR1 agonists, serotonergic agents, and glutamate modulation were included. Primary outcomes focused on symptom reduction and quality of life, while secondary outcomes included cognitive function and adverse events. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool was used for quality assessment.

RESULTS

Eleven studies involving 4614 participants (mean age 37-43 years, predominantly male) were included. Drugs evaluated included xanomeline-trospium (KarXT), pimavanserin, ulotaront, emraclidine, and bitopertin. Significant improvements in PANSS and CGI-S scores were observed, with xanomeline-trospium showing a mean reduction of 17.4 points (p < 0.001). Adverse events were mostly mild and transient, with nausea, constipation, and somnolence being common.

CONCLUSION

Novel treatments for schizophrenia show promise in managing both positive and negative symptoms, with generally favorable safety profiles. Future studies should focus on large-scale, long-term trials to refine their efficacy, safety, and clinical applicability.

Initiation of Antipsychotics During the First Year After First-Episode Psychosis: A Population-Based Study

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotics are recommended after first-episode psychosis. Knowledge on the current use patterns in real-world settings is thus important to inform clinical practice. We aimed to describe antipsychotic initiation during 1 year after first-episode psychosis and its associated factors.

METHODS

Population-based cohort study using linked nationwide health and population registers from Norway. The study population comprised 8052 persons aged 16-45 years with first-episode psychosis diagnosed in secondary care (ICD-10 F20, F22-F29) in the period 2011-2019. Initiation of antipsychotic use was defined as being dispensed antipsychotics (ATC N05A, excl. lithium) at least once from -90 to +365 days from secondary care diagnosis of first-episode psychosis. Antipsychotic polypharmacy during follow-up was defined as having at least 90 days with overlapping drug use periods modeled using the Prescriptions to Drug Use Periods method. Adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between socioeconomic and clinical factors and initiation of antipsychotic use were calculated using modified Poisson regression.

RESULTS

In total, 4413 persons (54.8%) initiated antipsychotic use after first-episode psychosis with proportions ranging from 45.5% in 2012 to 62.1% in 2019. Oral formulations of olanzapine (34.9%), quetiapine (21.2%), and aripiprazole (11.6%) were most common at initiation, whereas long-acting injectables (LAIs) and clozapine were rarely used. Among the initiators, 13.8% started a polypharmacy period lasting more than 90 days. Factors associated with antipsychotic initiation were lower age (aRR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08-1.21; 26-35 years vs. 36-45 years), higher education (1.11, 1.05-1.18), being employed (1.04, 1.00-1.09), being hospitalized (1.13, 1.09-1.18), being diagnosed late in the study period (1.16, 1.11-1.22; 2017-2019 vs. 2011-2013), or with previously diagnosed bipolar disorder, depression, or anxiety disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The antipsychotic use pattern is largely within the current clinical guideline. Primary non-compliance and disease severity may explain the socioeconomic and clinical differences related to initiation of antipsychotic use.

Continuous Dopamine D2 Receptor Blockade and Long-Term Outcome in First-Episode Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

It is not known what proportion of patients experience relapse in first-episode schizophrenia despite continuous dopamine D2 receptor blockade and whether breakthrough psychosis is attributable to long-term use of D2-blocking antipsychotics. Using data from a Finnish nationwide cohort, the authors sought to test the hypothesis that the incidence of breakthrough psychosis is accelerated among previously relapse-free patients receiving continuous D2 antagonist treatment beyond 5 years.

METHODS

All persons age 45 years or younger with first-episode schizophrenia were identified from the nationwide registry of inpatient care for the years 1996-2014. The primary outcome was a severe relapse leading to hospitalization among those treated continuously with long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics. The secondary outcome was the incidence rate ratio (IRR) of relapse during years 2-10, using year 1 as the reference.

RESULTS

A total of 305 patients initiated ensured LAI use during the first 30 days of follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that during the 10-year follow-up, their cumulative probability of relapse was 45% (95% CI=35-57). The annual relapse incidence per person-year decreased from 0.26 (95% CI=0.20-0.35) during the first year to 0.05 (95% CI=0.01-0.19) during the fifth year, corresponding to an IRR of 0.18 (95% CI=0.04-0.74). During years 6-10, only four relapses occurred during 128 person-years, corresponding to an IRR of 0.12 (95% CI=0.03-0.33) compared with year 1.

CONCLUSIONS

About 40%-50% of patients with first-episode schizophrenia will relapse despite continuous D2 blockade, apparently due to non-dopaminergic elements of the pathophysiology of the illness, as the results show that long-term dopamine receptor blockade is not associated with an increased risk of breakthrough psychosis.

Frequency, correlates and outcomes of Benzodiazepine use during Cariprazine treatment: A pooled post-hoc analysis from four 6-week, placebo-controlled trials in patients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia

Given the frequent prescription of benzodiazepines (BZDs) as adjunctive treatment to antipsychotics, this study aimed to uncover how BZD use affects treatment outcomes with cariprazine (CAR). This post-hoc analysis used pooled data from four placebo-controlled trials in patients with acute schizophrenia. Efficacy evaluations involved changes from baseline to Week 6 on PANSS Total Score, Marder Positive Factor Score, Excitement Component Subscale Score, and Marder Anxiety Single Item Score. Safety evaluations focused on extrapyramidal symptoms and akathisia. Comparisons were made between CAR alone vs. placebo (PLB) alone; CAR+BZD vs. PLB+BZD; CAR alone vs. CAR+BZD; and PLB alone vs. PLB+BZD. Data from 1643 patients were analysed (CAR only=943; CAR+BZD=132; PLB only=475; PLB+BZD=93). CAR alone yielded significantly greater improvement on all measures than PLB alone. CAR+BZD yielded significantly greater improvements in overall schizophrenia symptoms than PLB+BZD. CAR alone showed greater improvements in overall, positive, and anxiety symptoms compared to CAR+BZD. PLB alone yielded significantly greater improvements in positive and anxiety symptoms than PLB+BZD. Anxiety and agitation were the leading reasons for BZD administration. CAR was associated with more akathisia and EPS in both the non-BZD and BZD-user groups than PLB. The results support the superior efficacy of CAR with or without BZD co-treatment for total and positive symptoms of schizophrenia compared to PLB with or without BZD use. These findings suggest BZDs should be used for emergent symptoms like anxiety or agitation, rather than core schizophrenia symptoms.

Third-Generation Antipsychotics: The Quest for the Key to Neurotrophism

Antipsychotic drugs (APs) have profoundly changed the treatment landscape for psychiatric disorders, yet their impact on neuroplasticity and neurotrophism remains only partially understood. While second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are associated with a better side effect profile than their predecessors, the emergence of third-generation antipsychotics (TGAs)-such as brexpiprazole, cariprazine, lurasidone, iloperidone, lumateperone, pimavanserin, and roluperidone-has prompted renewed interest in their potential neuroprotective and pro-cognitive effects. This review attempts to carefully examine the evidence on the neurotrophic properties of TGAs and their role in modulating brain plasticity by analyzing studies published between 2010 and 2024. Although data remain limited and focused primarily on earlier SGAs, emerging findings suggest that some TGAs may exert positive effects on neuroplastic processes, including the modulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factors (BDNFs) and synaptic architecture. However, robust clinical data on their long-term effects and comparative efficacy are lacking; therefore, further research is necessary to validate their role in preventing neurodegenerative changes and improving cognitive outcomes in patients with psychiatric conditions.

Navigating agitation in neurodevelopmental disorders: A comparative study of pharmacotherapies via network meta-analysis in children and adults with autism spectrum disorder or intellectual disabilities

IMPORTANCE

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability often experience persistent challenges related to aggressive behaviour and agitation, highlighting the critical need for evidence-based pharmacological interventions among other strategies. Despite previous network meta-analyses (NMAs), the rapidly evolving landscape of treatment options necessitates ongoing and updated assessments.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of various pharmacotherapies in managing agitation in children and adults with ASD or intellectual disabilities (ID).

METHODS

Employing a systematic review and network meta-analysis methodology, we conducted an exhaustive search across multiple databases for double-blind, randomized controlled trials focusing on pharmacotherapies targeting agitation in these neurodevelopmental disorders. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines, our assessment of study quality utilized the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool to ensure methodological rigour and accuracy in data synthesis. Primary outcomes encompassed measures of reduced agitation, as indicated by treatment response on standardized agitation scales, alongside dropout rates, providing a comprehensive overview of treatment efficacy and tolerability.

RESULTS

Our analysis included data from 38 eligible trials, involving 2503 participants across both pediatric and adult populations. Key pharmacological interventions, such as arbaclofen, risperidone plus buspirone, omega-3 fatty acids, risperidone plus palmitoylethanolamide, aripiprazole and risperidone, demonstrated significant efficacy in reducing agitation compared to placebo. Importantly, these treatments were generally well-tolerated, with no significant increase in all-cause dropouts compared to placebo, highlighting their suitability for clinical use in managing agitation in individuals with ASD or ID.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the efficacy and tolerability of several pharmacotherapies in managing agitation among children and adults with ASD or ID. Our findings provide robust evidence that specific treatments, such as arbaclofen, risperidone plus buspirone and omega-3 fatty acids, are both effective and well-tolerated, offering valuable therapeutic options for clinicians. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing research to ensure that treatment strategies remain aligned with the evolving clinical landscape, ultimately improving patient outcomes in this challenging population.

Impact of Antipsychotic Medications on Weight Gain and Eating Disorder-Related Psychopathology in Adult Inpatients with Anorexia Nervosa

INTRODUCTION

The impact of antipsychotic use on weight gain and eating disorder-related psychopathology in adult inpatients with anorexia nervosa (AN) is unclear.

METHODS

Consecutively hospitalized adults with AN were retrospectively analyzed. Co-primary outcomes were body mass index (BMI) and weekly weight change. Secondary outcomes were Eating Disorder Inventory-2 (EDI-2) subscale scores 'drive for thinness' and 'body dissatisfaction'. Admission-to-discharge changes were compared in patients continuing pre-admission antipsychotics (APcont), starting antipsychotics (APnew) and patients without psychopharmacotherapy (noMed) using linear mixed models. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in subgroups matched for age, length of stay, baseline BMI and baseline EDI-2 scores. Subgroups were also compared regarding BMI trajectories, using non-linear growth curve models. Within-group analyses compared weight gain before vs. after the median antipsychotic onset week.

RESULTS

Of 775 adult inpatients (mean length of stay =103.5±48.0 days), 21.7% received antipsychotics (APcont =7.7%; APnew=13.9%), i. e., olanzapine (n=127, dose =5.5±3.1 mg/day) or quetiapine (n=41, dose=100.0±97.7 mg/day), while 78.3% did not receive any medication. Comparing all three groups, a significant time×group interaction was found for noMed and APnew vs. APcont (p=0.011), but this effect disappeared when comparing matched subgroups. However, in matched subgroups (n=54 each) APnew showed steeper weight gain vs. APcont both overall (p=0.011) and after median antipsychotic initiation (5.8±5.0 weeks) (p≤0.001). No significant group differences emerged in EDI-2 subscale scores.

DISCUSSION

In this naturalistic study, 22% of adult inpatients received antipsychotics. However, neither weight gain nor AN-related psychopathology changed differently in patients treated with vs. without antipsychotics. Newly initiated antipsychotic treatment vs. continuation from pre-admission had better weight gain outcomes.

Lumateperone for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder With Mixed Features or Bipolar Depression With Mixed Features: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifer NCT04285515) evaluated efficacy and safety of lumateperone to treat major depressive episodes (MDEs) associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression with mixed features.

PROCEDURES

Patients (18-75 years) with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5)-defined MDD with mixed features (n = 185) or bipolar disorder with mixed features (n = 200) and experiencing an MDE were randomized 1:1 to 6-week placebo (n = 195) or lumateperone 42 mg (n = 193). Primary and key secondary endpoints were change from baseline to day 43 in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale Total and Clinical Global Impression Scale-Severity (CGI-S) scores in 3 populations with combined MDD/bipolar depression, individual MDD, and individual bipolar depression. Safety included adverse events (AEs), extrapyramidal symptoms, and laboratory parameters.

RESULTS

Lumateperone met the primary endpoint, significantly improving Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score at day 43 in populations with combined MDD/bipolar depression (least squares mean difference vs placebo [LSMD], -5.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], -7.60,-3.84; effect size [ES], -0.64; P < 0.0001), MDD (LSMD, -5.9; 95% CI, -8.61,-3.29; ES, -0.67; P < 0.0001), and bipolar depression (LSMD, -5.7; 95% CI, -8.29,-3.05; ES, -0.64; P < 0.0001). Lumateperone significantly improved CGI-S and Young Mania Rating Scale total scores at day 43 in these populations. Lumateperone was well-tolerated. Treatment-emergent AEs (≥5%, twice placebo) in the combined population were somnolence (placebo, 1.6%; lumateperone, 12.5%), dizziness (placebo, 2.1%; lumateperone, 12.0%), and nausea (placebo, 1.6%; lumateperone, 9.9%). There were no mania/hypomania treatment-emergent AEs with lumateperone and minimal extrapyramidal symptoms or metabolic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Lumateperone 42 mg significantly improved depression symptoms and disease severity and was generally safe and well-tolerated in patients with MDD or bipolar depression with mixed features.

LC-MS/MS quantification of olanzapine in hair after alkaline digestion

Olanzapine (OLZ), a second-generation antipsychotic drug, is effective in the treatment of acute psychosis, schizophrenia, agitation, bipolar mania, and other psychiatric problems. Antipsychotics are prescribed drugs, which lead the drug abuser to illegal methods of access. This behavior also demonstrates the association of OLZ with criminal involvement, commonly observed at forensic crime scenes. The acute toxicity and even death resulting from OLZ exposure have been highlighted in numerous studies. Therefore, developing analytical techniques to detect OLZ is essential for forensic toxicology. This study aimed to develop a specific and reliable LC-MS/MS method for OLZ detection and quantification in hair samples. The method was validated in terms of selectivity, linearity, limit of detection (LOD), limit of quantification (LOQ), trueness, precision, and uncertainty. The range of linearity was between 0.1-100 ng/mg, with LOD and LOQ values established at 0.036 ng/mg and 0.1 ng/mg, respectively. All validation results are within acceptable parameters. The validated method has been applied to authentic hair samples. The variation of OLZ concentrations in 12 hair segments (2 from Case 1 and 10 from Case 2) from two drug-positive patients, ranging from 0.131 to 0.460 ng/mg, is presented in this study. Although several studies have been conducted to determine OLZ in hair samples using segmental analysis via hair solubilization, this study is the first to determine OLZ in hair samples after "digestion" with comparative parameters prior to chromatographic analysis.

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of xanomeline-trospium chloride for schizophrenia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The United States Food and Drug Administration approved xanomeline-trospium combination for schizophrenia on September-26-2024. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review with random-effects meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of xanomeline-trospium in randomized controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycINFO, October-01-2024). Co-primary outcomes were Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score (standardized mean difference=SMD), and all-cause discontinuation (risk ratio=RR). Cochrane's Risk of Bias (RoB) Tool 2 and GRADE were used. Xanomeline-trospium (k = 3, schizophrenia acute exacerbation, RoB=low, baseline N = 690, males=75.5 %, age=44.3 + 11.0, duration=5 weeks) outperformed placebo on PANSS total (SMD=-0.56, 95 % confidence interval/CI=-0.72/-0.40), positive (SMD=-0.59, 95 %CI=-0.75/-0.43), negative (SMD=-0.33, 95 %CI=-0.49/-0.17), and Marder Factor negative symptom score (SMD=-0.36, 95 %CI=-0.60/-0.13), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (SMD=-0.54, 95 %CI=-0.71/-0.37) (GRADE=moderate), and response (≥30 % reduction from baseline: RR=2.13, 95 %CI=1.66-2.75). Risk of ≥7 % weight gain (RR=0.46, 95 %CI=0.25-0.87, NNT=19), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels were reduced, while risk was increased for vomiting, hypertension, nausea, dry mouth, dyspepsia, constipation (RR=7.60, 95 %CI=1.50-38.57 to RR=2.72, 95 %CI=1.63-4.55), any adverse event (RR=1.33, 95 %CI=1.18-1.51, NNT=6), triglyceride levels and supine heart rate (GRADE=moderate to high). Conversely, the risk was not increased for any other, serious, or severe adverse events or all-cause discontinuation. In post-hoc analyses, xanomeline-trospium outperformed placebo regarding response (≥20 % and ≥30 % threshold) starting at week 2, negative symptoms in patients with prominent negative symptoms, and cognitive symptoms in patients ≥1 standard deviation below the general population norm. Further, pro-/anti-cholinergic side effects were mild-moderate and mostly transient. Xanomeline-trospium is an effective treatment for schizophrenia with a unique tolerability profile, potentially addressing unmet needs.

A Clinically Oriented Review of New Antipsychotics for Schizophrenia

BACKGROUND

Currently available antipsychotics, mainly targeting the dopaminergic pathway, fail to address the complexity of schizophrenic symptoms and can lead to burdening adverse events. The need for innovative pharmacological options remains critical and research is now focusing on the development of non-dopaminergic antipsychotics. This review aims to summarize the current literature on the most promising non-dopaminergic new APs (muscarinic agonists, Trace Amine Associated Receptor 1 agonists, Glycine Transporter Type 1 inhibitors and 5-HT2A antagonists) and provide a clinically oriented overview of their efficacy, safety and potential use in schizophrenia.

METHODS

A preliminary search was conducted through the Clinical Trials Database, in order to identify a representative (at late-stage clinical development) for each pharmacological class. The following drugs were selected: bitopertin (GlyT-1 inhibitor), pimavanserin (5-HT2A antagonist), ulotaront (TAAR1 agonist) and xanomeline-trospium (muscarinic agonist). Then, a literature search was conducted through PubMed, in order to retrieve current literature focusing on the efficacy and safety of these drugs.

RESULTS

The clinical development of bitopertin and pimavanserin was halted despite the early promises. Xanomeline-trospium chloride was recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of schizophrenia. Ulotaront showed mixed results, although analysis is ongoing.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our review indicate that research on the treatment of schizophrenia is gaining momentum. However, it is crucial to remain cautious about over-optimism, as many compounds have failed to deliver the expected results. A balanced approach is recommended when dealing with new APs, whether under investigation or approved. In the latter case, clinicians should carefully evaluate the cost-benefit ratio. Since several agents are still being tested, there is hope that additional data may present new therapeutic opportunities.

The Association Between Antipsychotics and Bone Fragility: An Updated Comprehensive Review

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic drugs appear to be related to reduced bone mineral density (BMD). We conducted a narrative review to collect the available literature investigating the relationship between antipsychotic use and bone fragility.

METHODS

A review of the published literature was conducted and reported through PubMed/Scopus/Cochrane libraries. We included studies using any antipsychotic treatment where the bone metabolism, osteoporosis, and/or risk of fractures has been assessed.

RESULTS

After screening 1707 items, we finally included 15 papers. A total of 3245 initial patients were identified, of whom 1357 patients with a mean age of 43.8 years underwent antipsychotic treatment and were analyzed. The mean antipsychotic treatment duration of the treated group was 15.8 ± 13.9 years. Among the included studies, two reported a statistically significant difference in lumbar BMD reduction between the antipsychotic exposed group and the control group. Femoral neck BMD levels had been reported in four of the case-control studies; two reported a statistically significant difference in femoral neck BMD reduction between the antipsychotic exposed group and the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonged use of antipsychotic treatment seems to be associated with an increased risk of reduced BMD, and, consequentially, with an augmented risk of bone fragility and fractures. This effect is not limited to vulnerable groups, such as those with significant medical comorbidities, the elderly, and postmenopausal women, but may also apply to anyone using antipsychotics in the long-term. Clinicians' awareness of antipsychotic prescriptions should optimize their potential while reducing this risk.

Pharmacist-led Si-care (schizophrenia care) model to improve medication adherence and symptom management in schizophrenia

Introduction

Schizophrenia is a chronic mental disorder that requires long-term treatment, particularly antipsychotic medications. However, medication adherence among patients with schizophrenia is often suboptimal, leading to symptom relapse and poor outcomes. The Si-Care (Schizophrenia Care) program was developed as a pharmacist-led home intervention to improve medication adherence and support symptom control in patients with schizophrenia. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the Si-Care intervention in improving medication adherence and maintaining stability of symptoms among schizophrenia patients.

Methods

A quasi-experimental study was conducted in three community health centers or Puskesmas in Banjarmasin, Indonesia. A total of 57 participants were recruited according to the sampling criteria. The Si-Care intervention consisted of seven home visits by trained pharmacists over four months, providing education, counseling, and medication monitoring. Adherence to medication was evaluated using the pill count method and severity of symptoms was measured using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) pre- and post-intervention. Data were analyzed using the Friedman test for adherence and the Wilcoxon test for PANSS scores.

Results

Mean medication adherence improved significantly from 77.38 % ± 25.85 at baseline (T0) to 97.57 % ± 11.09 at the final visit (T4) (p = 0.000). However, the decrease in PANSS scores from 38.03 ± 9.14 to 37.81 ± 9.15 was not statistically significant (p = 0.089). Despite the lack of significant change in PANSS scores, symptoms remained stable throughout the intervention, suggesting effective symptom management.

Conclusions

The Si-Care intervention significantly improved medication adherence among people with schizophrenia, contributing to the maintenance of stable symptoms. Pharmacist-led home interventions provide valuable support to address adherence challenges and should be considered a critical component in schizophrenia care. Future studies should consider a more rigorous design, a larger sample size, and longer follow-up to better evaluate the sustainability, scalability, and applicability of the intervention in diverse healthcare settings.

Switching a combination of first- and second-generation antipsychotic polypharmacy to antipsychotic monotherapy in long-term inpatients with schizophrenia and related disorders. The SwAP trial II: Results on side effects

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effects of switching antipsychotic polypharmacy (APP) to antipsychotic monotherapy (APM) on various side effects in inpatients with schizophrenia. Side effects of interest included psychic, autonomic, and sexual symptoms, as well as metabolic side effects and movement disorders.

METHOD

A 9-month parallel randomized open-label clinical trial was conducted involving 136 chronic inpatients from two psychiatric hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants were randomly assigned to either a STAY or a SWITCH group. The SWITCH group underwent a 3-month tapering-off period in which either first-generation or second-generation antipsychotic medication was discontinued, followed by APM. Patients were assessed at baseline and at follow-up assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months. Psychic, neurological, autonomic, and sexual side effects were evaluated using the UKU Rating Scale, while movement disorders were measured with the St. Hans Rating Scale. Various metabolic parameters were also recorded.

RESULTS

In the STAY group, side effects remained generally stable over time, except for a slight reduction in sexual desire. In contrast, the SWITCH group experienced significant reductions in psychic and autonomic symptoms, as well as improvements in akathisia, parkinsonism, and dyskinesia. There were no changes in dystonia, paresthesia, epilepsy, or sexual symptoms for this group. Notably, the SWITCH group also showed significant reductions in BMI and body weight.

CONCLUSION

Switching APP to APM in long-term inpatients reduces the severity of various side effects, including movement disorders and metabolic side effects.

Advanced Drug Delivery Technologies for Enhancing Bioavailability and Efficacy of Risperidone

Multidisciplinary research has been conducted on novel drug delivery technologies to maximize therapeutic advantages while curtailing undesirable reactions. Drugs under BCS Class II often have a low bioavailability because the dissolution phase limits the absorption efficiency. In this review, risperidone was used as a pharmacological model to examine the impact of solubility enhancement at the primary administration site for such pharmaceuticals. For tackling drug-related pertains like disease diagnostics, therapy, and prophylactic measures at the cellular or molecular levels, implementing nanocarriers in therapeutics has significant potential. The comprehensive pharmaceutical compositions of risperidone nano-microparticles that have been developed to alleviate psychosis are highlighted in the study, which also illustrates potential future developments in such domains.

Antipsychotic Use and Risk of Breast Cancer in Women With Severe Mental Illness: Replication of a Nationwide Nested Case-Control Database Study

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS

Breast cancer is more prevalent in women with severe mental illness than in the general population, and use of prolactin-increasing antipsychotics may be a contributing factor.

STUDY DESIGN

A nested case-control study was conducted using the Swedish nationwide registers (inpatient/outpatient care, sickness absence, disability pension, prescribed drugs, cancers). All women aged 18-85 years with schizophrenia/schizoaffective/other nonaffective psychotic disorder/bipolar disorder and breast cancer (cases) were matched for age, primary psychiatric diagnosis, and disease duration with five women without cancer (controls). The association between cumulative exposure to prolactin-increasing/prolactin-sparing antipsychotics and breast cancer was analyzed using conditional logistic regression, adjusted for comorbidities and co-medications.

STUDY RESULTS

Among 132 061 women, 1642 (1.24%) developed breast cancer between 2010 and 2021, at a mean age of 63.3 ± 11.8 years. Compared with 8173 matched controls, the odds of breast cancer increased in women with prior exposure to prolactin-increasing antipsychotics for 1-4 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.41), and for ≥ 5 years (aOR = 1.47, 95%CI = 1.26-1.71). There were no increased or decreased odds of breast cancer with exposure to prolactin-sparing antipsychotics of either 1-4 years (aOR = 1.17, 95%CI = 0.98-1.40) or ≥5 years (aOR = 0.99, 95%CI = 0.78-1.26). The results were consistent across all sensitivity analyses (ie, according to different age groups, cancer types, and primary psychiatric diagnosis).

CONCLUSIONS

Although causality remains uncertain, exposure to prolactin-elevating antipsychotics for ≥ 1 year was associated with increased odds of breast cancer in women with severe mental illness. When prescribing antipsychotics, a shared decision-making process should consider individual risk factors for breast cancer.

Recent Advances in representative small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors: Synthetic Routes and clinical applications

The dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) represents a pivotal target for therapeutic intervention in the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and Parkinson's disease. The successful discovery of numerous effective DRD2 inhibitors has led to their clinical application and ongoing evaluation in various clinical trials. This review explores the synthetic approaches and clinical applications of prototypical small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors that have received approval or are currently undergoing clinical trials, highlighting their therapeutic potential and challenges. The synthesis of these inhibitors employs various chemical strategies, including modifications of phenothiazine and butyrophenone structures, which have yielded significant antipsychotic agents like chlorpromazine and haloperidol. Additionally, newer classes of inhibitors, such as aripiprazole, exhibit partial agonist activity at DRD2, offering a unique therapeutic profile. Clinically, DRD2 inhibitors demonstrate efficacy in managing positive symptoms of schizophrenia, manic episodes in bipolar disorder, and dopaminergic imbalance in Parkinson's disease. However, the emergence of adverse effects, including tardive dyskinesia, extrapyramidal symptoms and metabolic syndrome, presents substantial challenges. Advances in the development of second-generation antipsychotics aim to balance efficacy with a better side effect profile by targeting additional neurotransmitter receptors. This review aims to deliver an overview of the synthesis and clinical applications of representative small-molecule DRD2 inhibitors across various clinical phases, thereby offering strategic insights for the advancement of DRD2 inhibitor development.

Optimisation of pharmacotherapy in psychiatry through therapeutic drug monitoring, molecular brain imaging and pharmacogenetic tests: Focus on antipsychotics

BACKGROUND

For psychotic disorders (i.e. schizophrenia), pharmacotherapy plays a key role in controlling acute and long-term symptoms. To find the optimal individual dose and dosage strategy, specialised tools are used. Three tools have been proven useful to personalise drug treatments: therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of drug levels, pharmacogenetic testing (PG), and molecular neuroimaging.

METHODS

In these Guidelines, we provide an in-depth review of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacogenetics for 45 antipsychotics. Over 30 international experts in psychiatry selected studies that have measured drug concentrations in the blood (TDM), gene polymorphisms of enzymes involved in drug metabolism, or receptor/transporter occupancies in the brain (positron emission tomography (PET)).

RESULTS

Study results strongly support the use of TDM and the cytochrome P450 (CYP) genotyping and/or phenotyping to guide drug therapies. Evidence-based target ranges are available for titrating drug doses that are often supported by PET findings.

CONCLUSION

All three tools discussed in these Guidelines are essential for drug treatment. TDM goes well beyond typical indications such as unclear compliance and polypharmacy. Despite its enormous potential to optimise treatment effects, minimise side effects and ultimately reduce the global burden of diseases, personalised drug treatment has not yet become the standard of care in psychiatry.

Efficacy and safety of lumateperone for bipolar depression and schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lumateperone in treating bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases and websites from inception to July 16, 2024, to identify both published and unpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects or fixed-effects models depending on statistical heterogeneity. Relative risks (RRs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to summarize the effects. Out of 931 records screened, 7 RCTs (four focusing on bipolar depression and 3 on schizophrenia) were eligible for inclusion. Lumateperone was efficacious in reducing depressive symptoms in bipolar depression (SMDs = -0.36, 95% CI: -.59 to -.13). In treating schizophrenia, lumateperone exhibited a lower combined SMD of -0.14 (95% CI: -.27 to 0, P = .051, I² = 49.6%), showing no significant difference from the placebo group, although the P-value approached significance. The lumateperone group showed significantly higher response rates compared with placebo in both bipolar depression (RRs = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.07 to 1.51) and schizophrenia (RRs = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.12 to 1.86). Common treatment-emergent adverse events included somnolence, dry mouth, dizziness, nausea, and headache (RRs = 1.30 to 3.29). Importantly, lumateperone did not significantly increase extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS, RRs = 1.46, 95% CI = .84 to 2.53). Lumateperone is effective in treating bipolar depression but does not significantly reduce symptom severity in schizophrenia. It has a favorable safety and tolerability profile. However, caution is warranted in interpreting these findings due to the limited number of studies included.

Clozapine-Associated Sialorrhea: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Clozapine has demonstrated efficacy in treating treatment-resistant schizophrenia; however, it has a wide range of side effects. Sialorrhea is a common side effect of clozapine that causes the patient to withdraw from social life. This review aims to evaluate and summarize the prevalence, mechanism, risk factors, and management of clozapine-associated sialorrhea.

PROCEDURES

The literature was explored for the prevalence, the mechanisms, the risk factors, and the management of sialorrhea. The following search strings and terms were used: "clozapine," "sialorrhea," "hypersalivation," "clozapine induced sialorrhea," and "clozapine induced hypersalivation".

STUDY RESULTS

Hypersalivation is one of the most common side effects of clozapine. Over the course of clozapine therapy, hypersalivation has been reported to have an incidence of 30% to -80%. Although different treatment approaches are applied on a case-by-case basis in the clinic, depending on the practitioners' preferences, there is a lack of clear guidelines for managing this common side effect that jeopardizes patients' social life.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important for healthcare professionals and patients that some clear treatment options for clozapine-associated sialorrhea are brought to the forefront and widely used, especially based on the research conducted to date.

Drug-induced myocarditis: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system database

BACKGROUND

Myocarditis is a rare but potentially life-threatening inflammation of the heart muscle that can be caused by various drugs. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate the risk of drug-induced myocarditis using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

METHODS

We queried the FAERS database for reports of myocarditis from Q1 2004 to Q4 2023. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR) were calculated to detect disproportionality signals for drugs associated with myocarditis.

RESULTS

A total of 8,212 myocarditis-related reports were identified in the FAERS database. The most frequently reported drugs were clozapine (N = 1269), followed by nivolumab (N = 621), pembrolizumab (N = 358), mesalazine (252), and olanzapine (N = 191). Disproportionality analysis revealed strong signals for the top 50 drugs, including mesalazine (ROR 48.01, 95% CI 42.29-54.49), cemiplimab (ROR 38.84, 95% CI 26.71-56.47), clozapine (ROR 35.21, 95% CI 33.13-37.39), nivolumab (ROR 23.21, 95% CI 21.38-25.2), atezolizumab (ROR 20.75, 95% CI 17.91-24.05) and pembrolizumab (ROR 19.90, 95% CI 17.89-22.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest a potential risk of drug-induced myocarditis associated with various medications. Close monitoring for signs and symptoms of myocarditis is crucial, especially in patients with risk factors or those receiving these drugs. Further investigations are warranted to establish causality and identify risk factors.

Risk factors, prevention and treatment of weight gain associated with the use of antidepressants and antipsychotics: a state-of-the-art clinical review

INTRODUCTION

People with severe mental illness have poor cardiometabolic health. Commonly used antidepressants and antipsychotics frequently lead to weight gain, which may further contribute to adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

We searched MEDLINE up to April 2023 for umbrella reviews, (network-)meta-analyses, trials and cohort studies on risk factors, prevention and treatment strategies of weight gain associated with antidepressants/antipsychotics. We developed 10 clinical recommendations.

EXPERT OPINION

To prevent, manage, and treat antidepressant/antipsychotic-related weight gain, we recommend i) assessing risk factors for obesity before treatment, ii) monitoring metabolic health at baseline and regularly during follow-up, iii) offering lifestyle interventions including regular exercise and healthy diet based on patient preference to optimize motivation, iv) considering first-line psychotherapy for mild-moderate depression and anxiety disorders, v)choosing medications based on medications' and patient's weight gain risk, vi) choosing medications based on acute vs long-term treatment, vii) using effective, tolerated medications, viii) switching to less weight-inducing antipsychotics/antidepressants where possible, ix) using early weight gain as a predictor of further weight gain to inform the timing of intervention/switch options, and x) considering adding metformin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, or topiramate(second-line due to potential adverse cognitive effects) to antipsychotics, or aripiprazole to clozapine or olanzapine.

Treatment of Cognitive Impairment Associated with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: New Evidence, Challenges, and Future Perspectives

Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) represents one of the core features of the disorder and has a significant impact on functional and rehabilitation outcomes of people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD). The aim of this critical review is to highlight the most recent evidence on effective treatments available for CIAS, to discuss the current challenges in this field, and to present future perspectives that may help to overcome them. Concerning psychopharmacological approaches, among the most indicated strategies for the management and prevention of CIAS is to favor second-generation antipsychotic medications and avoid long-term and high-dose treatments with anticholinergic medications and benzodiazepines. Moreover, non-pharmacological approaches such as cognitive remediation and physical exercise-based programs represent evidence-based interventions in the treatment of CIAS that have shown reliable evidence of effectiveness on both cognitive and functional outcomes. These treatments, however, are still delivered to people accessing mental health services with a diagnosis of CIAS in an uneven manner, even in high-income countries. Academic and clinical partnership and collaboration, as well as advocacy from service users, families, carers, and stakeholders' organizations could help to reduce the bench to bedside gap in the treatment of CIAS. Future perspectives include the development of novel pharmacological agents that could be effective in the treatment of CIAS, the implementation of novel technologies such as telemedicine and virtual reality in the delivery of evidence-based interventions to improve accessibility and engagement, and further research in the field of non-invasive brain stimulation.

Impact of quetiapine on ion channels and contractile dynamics in rat ventricular myocyte

Antipsychotic drugs often lead to adverse effects, including those related to the cardiovascular system. Of these, quetiapine is known to cause significant changes in the QT interval although the underlying mechanism remains mysterious, prompting us to examine its effects on cardiac electrophysiological properties. Therefore, we investigated the effect of quetiapine on contraction, action potential (AP), and the associated membrane currents such as L-type Ca2+ and K+ using the whole-cell patch clamp method to examine its impacts on isolated rat ventricular myocytes. Our results showed that (1) quetiapine reduces cell contractility in a concentration-dependent manner and (2) leads to a significant prolongation in the duration of AP in isolated ventricular myocytes. This effect was both concentration and frequency-dependent; (3) quetiapine significantly decreased the Ca2+, transient outward K+, and steady-state K+ currents. However, only high concentration of quetiapine (100 μM) could significantly change the activation and reactivation kinetics of L-type Ca2+ channels. This study demonstrates that QT extension induced by quetiapine is mainly associated with the prolongation of AP. Moreover, quetiapine caused a significant decrease in contractile force and excitability of ventricular myocytes by suppressing Ca2+ and K+ currents.

What Remains to Be Discovered in Schizophrenia Therapeutics: Contributions by Advancing the Molecular Mechanisms of Drugs for Psychosis and Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a frequently debilitating and complex mental disorder affecting approximately 1% of the global population, characterized by symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thoughts and behaviors, cognitive dysfunction, and negative symptoms. Traditional treatment has centered on postsynaptic dopamine antagonists, commonly known as antipsychotic drugs, which aim to alleviate symptoms and improve functioning and the quality of life. Despite the availability of these medications, significant challenges remain in schizophrenia therapeutics, including incomplete symptom relief, treatment resistance, and medication side effects. This opinion article explores advancements in schizophrenia treatment, emphasizing molecular mechanisms, novel drug targets, and innovative delivery methods. One promising approach is novel strategies that target neural networks and circuits rather than single neurotransmitters, acknowledging the complexity of brain region interconnections involved in schizophrenia. Another promising approach is the development of biased agonists, which selectively activate specific signaling pathways downstream of receptors, offering potential for more precise pharmacological interventions with fewer side effects. The concept of molecular polypharmacy, where a single drug targets multiple molecular pathways, is exemplified by KarXT, a novel drug combining xanomeline and trospium to address both psychosis and cognitive dysfunction. This approach represents a comprehensive strategy for schizophrenia treatment, potentially improving outcomes for patients. In conclusion, advancing the molecular understanding of schizophrenia and exploring innovative therapeutic strategies hold promise for addressing the unmet needs in schizophrenia treatment, aiming for more effective and tailored interventions. Future research should focus on these novel approaches to achieve better clinical outcomes and improve the functional level and quality of life for individuals with schizophrenia.

Overcoming clozapine's adverse events: a narrative review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

INTRODUCTION

Clozapine is the gold standard treatment for treatment-resistant schizophrenia, however adverse events remain a clinical challenge.

AREAS COVERED

This review presents a narrative synthesis of systematic reviews and meta-analyses that have reported the onset, incidence, prevalence, and management of clozapine's adverse events. We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, OvidMEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to April 2024.

EXPERT OPINION

Effective management of clozapine's adverse events necessitates multi-faceted, individualized, and shared-decision strategies. Despite a lack of high-quality systematic evidence, expert inter-disciplinary solutions are provided to help address a critical need for clinical guidance. This 35-year update offers an evidence-based framework to assist clinicians, patients, and caregivers navigate the adverse events associated with clozapine therapy.

Pearls for Caring for the Boarding Psychiatric Patient in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Emergency department (ED) boarding of psychiatric patients is a national issue that continues to worsen at a disturbing rate. Implementing strategies in the ED to provide continuous care for patients can help secure patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to discuss the boarding of psychiatric patients and its implications. It will focus on executing best clinical practices in managing boarding psychiatric patients in the ED. It will not focus on the treatment of substance use disorders.

DISCUSSION

This article will address the pearls for management plans that can be implemented in the ED, alongside discussing pregnant and elderly patients. Risk factors, complications, and treatments for boarding psychiatric patients are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psychiatric disorders boarding in the ED need careful consideration of management plans to mitigate patient safety events.

Cannabidiol as an antipsychotic drug

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a major phytocannabinoid in the Cannabis sativa plant. In contrast to Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), CBD does not produce the typical psychotomimetic effects of the plant. In addition, CBD has attracted increased interest due to its potential therapeutic effects in various psychiatric disorders, including schizophrenia. Several studies have proposed that CBD has pharmacological properties similar to atypical antipsychotics. Despite accumulating evidence supporting the antipsychotic potential of CBD, the mechanisms of action in which this phytocannabinoid produces antipsychotic effects are still not fully elucidated. Here, we focused on the antipsychotic properties of CBD indicated by a series of preclinical and clinical studies and the evidence currently available about its possible mechanisms. Findings from preclinical studies suggest that CBD effects may depend on the animal model (pharmacological, neurodevelopmental, or genetic models for schizophrenia), dose, treatment schedule (acute vs. repeated) and route of administration (intraperitoneal vs local injection into specific brain regions). Clinical studies suggest a potential role for CBD in the treatment of psychotic disorders. However, future studies with more robust sample sizes are needed to confirm these positive findings. Overall, although more studies are needed, current evidence indicates that CBD may be a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of schizophrenia.

Finding the Right Setting for the Right Treatment During the Acute Treatment of Individuals with Schizophrenia: A Narrative Review and Clinical Practice Guideline

Background

Schizophrenia is most times a chronic and often debilitating illness associated with poor mental health outcomes. Early and effective treatment of schizophrenia in the most appropriate setting can make a significant difference in the long-term recovery. The aim of this narrative review was to provide suggestions and recommendations for effectively managing patients with schizophrenia during acute exacerbations and to enhance awareness and skills related to personalized medicine.

Methods

A panel of academics and clinicians with experience in the field of psychosis met virtually on July 13th 2023 to narratively review and discuss the research evidence and their clinical experience about the most appropriate acute treatments for patients with schizophrenia. This manuscript represents a synthesis of the panel analysis and discussion.

Results

First contact is very important for service users, as is finding the most adequate treatment setting. If patients present to the emergency department, which may be a traumatic setting for service users, a dedicated environment with adequate space and specialized mental health support, including personnel trained in de-escalation techniques, is recommended. A well-connected continuum of care is strongly recommended, possibly with seamless links between inpatient units, day hospital services, outpatient facilities and rehabilitation services. Ideally, this should be structured as part of a coordinated step-down service line. Treatment challenges include suboptimal response, side effects, and nonadherence, which is reduced by the use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics.

Conclusion

Individual circumstances, including age, gender, and presence of hostility/aggression or self-harm, cognitive impairment and negative symptoms, comorbidities (depression, substance use disorders) or associated symptoms (anxiety, insomnia), should be considered when selecting the most appropriate treatment for the acute phase of schizophrenia. Efficacy and feasibility, as well as acceptability and tolerability of treatments, require joint consideration from the early stages of schizophrenia, thereby enhancing the possibility of improved short- and long-term outcomes.

Survival, Attachment, and Healing: An Evolutionary Lens on Interventions for Trauma-Related Dissociation

Purpose

Dissociation is a necessary part of our threat response system, common to all animal species, normally temporarily activated under conditions of extreme or inescapable threat. Pathological dissociation, however, continues to occur after the initial threat has passed, in response to reminders or inaccessibility of safety and security. Present across the spectrum of psychiatric diagnoses, recurrent dissociative symptoms are linked to severe trauma exposure, insecure attachment, treatment non-response, and maladaptive coping behaviors such as substance use, suicidality, and self-harm. However, empirical studies testing treatments specific to dissociative processes remain scarce. This narrative review summarizes existing studies and provides theoretical, neurobiological, and evolutionary perspectives on dissociative processes and treatments for pathological dissociation.

Methods

A systematic search of five databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL plus, Scopus) was conducted on April 13, 2023. Peer-reviewed clinical studies with adult participants, assessing intervention effects on dissociative symptoms, were included. Results were thematically analyzed and summarized.

Results

Sixty-nine studies were identified, mainly focused on posttraumatic stress disorder, trauma-exposed populations, and borderline personality disorder. Psychotherapy was studied in 72.5% of studies; other interventions included medications and neurostimulation. The majority reported positive outcomes, despite the heterogeneous spectrum of interventions. However, treatment of dissociative symptoms was the primary objective in only a minority.

Conclusion

Pathological dissociation is a complex phenomenon involving brain and body systems designed for perceiving and responding to severe threats, requiring an individualized approach. A literature is emerging regarding potentially evidence-based treatments to help those impacted by recurrent dissociative symptoms. When contextualized within a neurobiological and evolutionary perspective, these treatments can be understood as facilitating an internal and/or relational sense of safety, resulting in symptom reduction. Further studies are needed to explore effective treatments for dissociative symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of long-acting injectable versus oral antipsychotics in the treatment of patients with early-phase schizophrenia-spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) have advantages over oral antipsychotics (OAPs) in preventing relapse and hospitalization in chronically ill patients with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSDs), but evidence in patients with first-episode/recent-onset, that is, early-phase-SSDs is less clear.

Objectives

To assess the relative medium- and long-term efficacy and safety of LAIs versus OAPs in the maintenance treatment of patients with early-phase SSDs.

Method

We searched major electronic databases for head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LAIs and OAPs for the maintenance treatment of patients with early-phase-SSDs.

Design

Pairwise, random-effects meta-analysis. Relapse/hospitalization and acceptability (all-cause discontinuation) measured at study-endpoint were co-primary outcomes, calculating risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses sought to identify factors moderating differences in efficacy or acceptability between LAIs and OAPs.

Results

Across 11 head-to-head RCTs (n = 2374, median age = 25.2 years, males = 68.4%, median illness duration = 45.8 weeks) lasting 13-104 (median = 78) weeks, no significant differences emerged between LAIs and OAPs for relapse/hospitalization prevention (RR = 0.79, 95%CI = 0.58-1.06, p = 0.13) and acceptability (RR = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.80-1.05, p = 0.20). The included trials were highly heterogeneous regarding methodology and patient populations. LAIs outperformed OAPs in preventing relapse/hospitalization in studies with stable patients (RR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.45-0.92), pragmatic design (RR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.54-0.82), and strict intent-to-treat approach (RR = 0.64, 95%CI = 0.52-0.80). Furthermore, LAIs were associated with better acceptability in studies with schizophrenia patients only (RR = 0.87, 95%CI = 0.79-0.95), longer illness duration (RR = 0.88, 95%CI = 0.80-0.97), unstable patients (RR = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.81-0.99) and allowed OAP supplementation of LAIs (RR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.81-0.99).

Conclusion

LAIs and OAPs did not differ significantly regarding relapse prevention/hospitalization and acceptability. However, in nine subgroup analyses, LAIs were superior to OAPs in patients with EP-SSDs with indicators of higher quality and/or pragmatic design regarding relapse/hospitalization prevention (four subgroup analyses) and/or reduced all-cause discontinuation (five subgroup analyses), without any instance of OAP superiority versus LAIs. More high-quality pragmatic trials comparing LAIs with OAPs in EP-SSDs are needed.

Trial registration

CRD42023407120 (PROSPERO).

Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and serotonin syndrome: a comparative bibliometric analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze and map scientific literature on Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome (NMS) and Serotonin Syndrome (SS) from prestigious, internationally indexed journals. The objective was to identify key topics, impactful articles, prominent journals, research output, growth patterns, hotspots, and leading countries in the field, providing valuable insights for scholars, medical students, and international funding agencies.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy was implemented in the PubMed MeSH database using specific keywords for NMS and SS. The search was conducted in the Scopus database, renowned for its extensive coverage of scholarly publications. Inclusion criteria comprised articles published from 1950 to December 31st, 2022, restricted to journal research and review articles written in English. Data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel for descriptive analysis, and VOSviewer was employed for bibliometric mapping.

RESULTS

The search yielded 1150 articles on NMS and 587 on SS, with the majority being case reports. Growth patterns revealed a surge in NMS research between 1981 and 1991, while SS research increased notably between 1993 and 1997. Active countries and journals differed between NMS and SS, with psychiatry journals predominating for NMS and pharmacology/toxicology journals for SS. Authorship analysis indicated higher multi-authored articles for NMS. Top impactful articles focused on review articles and pathogenic mechanisms. Research hotspots included antipsychotics and catatonia for NMS, while SS highlighted drug interactions and specific medications like linezolid and tramadol.

CONCLUSIONS

NMS and SS represent rare but life-threatening conditions, requiring detailed clinical and scientific understanding. Differential diagnosis and management necessitate caution in prescribing medications affecting central serotonin or dopamine systems, with awareness of potential drug interactions. International diagnostic tools and genetic screening tests may aid in safe diagnosis and prevention. Reporting rare cases and utilizing bibliometric analysis enhance knowledge dissemination and research exploration in the field of rare drug-induced medical conditions.

Therapeutic potential of gamma entrainment using sensory stimulation for cognitive symptoms associated with schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric disorder with significant morbidity. Treatment options that address the spectrum of symptoms are limited, highlighting the need for innovative therapeutic approaches. Gamma Entrainment Using Sensory Stimulation (GENUS) is an emerging treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders that uses sensory stimulation to entrain impaired oscillatory network activity and restore brain function. Aberrant oscillatory activity often underlies the symptoms experienced by patients with schizophrenia. We propose that GENUS has therapeutic potential for schizophrenia. This paper reviews the current status of schizophrenia treatment and explores the use of sensory stimulation as an adjunctive treatment, specifically through gamma entrainment. Impaired gamma frequency entrainment is observed in patients, particularly in response to auditory and visual stimuli. Thus, sensory stimulation, such as music listening, may have therapeutic potential for individuals with schizophrenia. GENUS holds novel therapeutic potential to improve the lives of individuals with schizophrenia, but further research is required to determine the efficacy of GENUS, optimize its delivery and therapeutic window, and develop strategies for its implementation in specific patient populations.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of dopamine-receptor antagonists for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

INTRODUCTION

Dopamine (D)2,3-receptor antagonists (RAs) were the first antiemetics used in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).

AREAS COVERED

Eight D2,3-RAs, amisulpride, domperidone, droperidol, haloperidol, metoclopramide, metopimazine, olanzapine and prochlorperazine are reviewed focusing on pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, antiemetic effect and side effects.

EXPERT OPINION

Since the introduction of D2,3-RAs, antiemetics such as corticosteroids, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)3-RAs and neurokinin (NK)1-RAs have been developed. The classical D2,3-RAs are recommended in the prophylaxis of CINV from low emetic risk chemotherapy, but not as a fixed component of an antiemetic regimen for moderately or highly (HEC) emetic risk chemotherapy. D2,3-RAs are also used in patients with breakthrough nausea and vomiting. It should be emphasized, that most of these drugs are not selective for dopamine receptors.The multi-receptor targeting agent, olanzapine, is recommended in the prophylaxis of HEC-induced CINV as part of a four-drug antiemetic regimen, including a 5-HT3-RA, dexamethasone and a NK1-RA. Olanzapine is the most effective agent to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea.Side effects differ among various D2,3-RAs. Metopimazine and domperidone possess a low risk of extrapyramidal side effects. Domperidone and metoclopramide are prokinetics, whereas metopimazine delays gastric emptying and haloperidol does not influence gastric motility. Many D2,3-RAs increase the risk of prolonged QTc interval; other side effects include sedation and orthostatic hypotension.

The effect of differences in trial design on estimates of efficacy of olanzapine in randomized studies

BACKGROUND

Differences in trial design may affect estimates of efficacy of psychotropic drugs. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to evaluate whether the use of Olanzapine (OLZ) as either investigational or control drug affects the observed efficacy of OLZ.

METHODS

We performed a search for Randomized-Controlled Trials (RCTs) in which the efficacy of OLZ is assessed in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. We assessed overall efficacy of OLZ and performed subgroup analyses of studies with OLZ as intervention or comparator. Mixed-effect meta-regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 25 RCTs included, OLZ was considered as investigational drug or active control in 13 and 12 studies, respectively. The reduction of PANSS score was greater in trials in which OLZ was used as investigational drug. Multivariate meta-regression models showed that a higher PANSS score at baseline and trial duration were the main predictors of greater PANSS score reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Trials with OLZ used as investigational drug differ from those of trials with OLZ as comparator for baseline PANSS scores and study duration; these differences may produce differences in estimates of efficacy. As a consequence, the severity of illness at enrollment and trial duration should be carefully considered to ensure the reliability of indirect comparisons among antipsychotics.

A 12-month longitudinal naturalistic follow-up of cariprazine in schizophrenia

Background

Cariprazine, a third-generation antipsychotic (TGAs), has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of schizophrenia with good tolerability profile. Actual real-world literature data are lacking, particularly when exploring its efficacy in the long term. The present study examined the effects of cariprazine treatment on specific psychopathological domains with a particular focus on outcomes and side effects in real-life experience, after a long-term treatment.

Methods

The present 12-month longitudinal naturalistic study included a sample of subjects with a DSM-5-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia, recruited in the outpatients' psychiatric services of university and community hospitals in Italy, naturally treated with cariprazine. The assessments included: a sociodemographic data sheet, the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-5 (SCID-5), the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) and the St. Hans Rating Scale (SHRS). The PANSS was also administered after 6 (T1) and 12 (T2) months of treatment with cariprazine while the SHRS at T1.

Results

The total sample consisted of 31 patients, 15 males and 16 females. A significant decrease of the PANSS' subscales, Marder factors and total mean scores emerged at both T1 and T2 with respect to T0. Extrapyramidal symptoms occurred in a minority of patients and in mild or mild/moderate forms: no patient showed moderate forms of psychic/motor akathisia or dystonia, three subjects showed moderate parkinsonism.

Conclusions

This study confirms a good efficacy profile of cariprazine in both positive and negative symptoms in patients with Schizophrenia, combined with a good tolerability profile in extrapyramidal symptoms.

Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Hip Fracture: Prevalence and Outcomes

Objective. Although the association between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and osteoporotic fractures is well established, data on CKD combined with hip fracture (HF) are scarce and controversial. We aimed to assess in patients with HF the prevalence of CKD, its impact on hospital mortality and length of stay (LOS) and to determine the prognostic value of CKD to predict hospital outcomes. Methods. Prospectively collected clinical data were analysed in 3623 consecutive HF patients aged ≥65 years (mean age 83.4 ± 7.50 [standard deviation] years; 74.4% females). Results. CKD among older patients with HF is highly prevalent (39.9%), has different clinical characteristics, a 2.5-fold higher mortality rate, and 40% greater risk of prolonged LOS. The strongest risk for a poor outcome was advanced age (>80 years). The risk of death substantially increases in combination with chronic disorders, especially coronary artery disease, anaemia, hyperparathyroidism, and atrial fibrillation; models based only on three variables—CKD stage, age >80, and presence of a specific chronic condition—predicted in-hospital death with good discrimination capability (AUC ≥ 0.700) and reasonable accuracy, the number needed to predict ranged between 5.7 and 14.5. Only 12% of HF patients received osteoporotic drugs prefracture. Conclusion. In HF patients with CKD, the risk of adverse outcomes largely increases in parallel with worsening kidney function and, especially, in combination with comorbidities; models based on three admission variables predict a fatal outcome. Assessment of renal function is essential to preventing osteoporotic fractures.

Identification and treatment of individuals with childhood-onset and early-onset schizophrenia

Approximately 8 % of patients with schizophrenia are diagnosed before age 18, and 18 % experience their first symptoms before age 18. This narrative review explores the management of patients with early-onset schizophrenia (EOS) and childhood-onset schizophrenia (COS) from diagnosis to their transition to adult care settings. Early diagnosis of schizophrenia in children and adolescents is essential for improving outcomes, but delays are common due to overlapping of symptoms with developmental phenomena and other psychiatric conditions, including substance use, and lack of clinicians' awareness. Once diagnosed, antipsychotic treatment is key, with specific second-generation agents generally being preferred due to better tolerability and their broader efficacy evidence-base in youth. Dosing should be carefully individualized, considering age-related differences in drug metabolism and side effect liability. Clinicians must be vigilant in detecting early non-response and consider switching or dose escalation when appropriate. Since early age of illness onset is a consistent risk factor for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), clinicians need to be competent in diagnosing TRS and using clozapine. Since COS and EOS are associated with cognitive deficits and impaired functioning, psychosocial interventions should be considered to improve overall functioning and quality of life. Good long-term outcomes depend on continuous treatment engagement, and successful transitioning from pediatric to adult care requires careful planning, early preparation, and collaboration between pediatric and adult clinicians. Targeting functional outcomes and quality of life in addition to symptom remission can improve overall patient well-being. Comprehensive evaluations, age-specific assessments, and targeted interventions are needed to address the unique challenges of EOS and COS.

Prescriptions for Antipsychotics: Youth with Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities Compared to Youth without Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare antipsychotic use by youth with intellectual/developmental disabilities to youth without IDD as they transitioned from pediatric to adult health care services. In addition, antipsychotic use was compared between youth with different types of IDD (autism, Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, Down syndrome and 'other').

METHODS

Population level administrative health data was used to compare the dispensing of antipsychotics for youth aged 15 to 24 years with and without IDD, between 2010 and 2019. Because antipsychotics are associated with metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes, we also examined the dispensing data for metformin. In addition, we examined dispensed antipsychotics between different types of IDD. For both dispensing of antipsychotics and metformin, we used multi-variable logistic regression to derive adjusted odds ratios.

RESULTS

There were 20,591 youth with IDD and 1,293,791 youth without IDD. Youth with IDD had significantly higher odds of being dispensed an antipsychotic (7.13 (6.82, 7.44)), even when a diagnosis of a psychotic illness was included in the regression. Higher odds were found in all age groups. Youth with IDD also had significantly higher odds of being dispensed metformin (3.739 (3.323, 4.208)) compared to youth without IDD. Youth with autism, FAS and 'other' types of IDD diagnoses all had higher odds of being dispensed an antipsychotic compared to youth with Down syndrome.

CONCLUSION

Compared to youth without IDD, youth with IDD were more frequently dispensed antipsychotics and metformin. These findings have important implications for the health of youth with IDD.

A Hybrid Type 1 trial of a multi-component mHealth intervention to improve post-hospital transitions of care for patients with serious mental illness: Study protocol

BACKGROUND

The transition from acute (e.g., psychiatric hospitalization) to outpatient care is associated with increased risk for rehospitalization, treatment disengagement, and suicide among people with serious mental illness (SMI). Mobile interventions (i.e., mHealth) have the potential to increase monitoring and improve coping post-acute care for this population. This protocol paper describes a Hybrid Type 1 effectiveness-implementation study, in which a randomized controlled trial will be conducted to determine the effectiveness of a multi-component mHealth intervention (tFOCUS) for improving outcomes for adults with SMI transitioning from acute to outpatient care.

METHODS

Adults meeting criteria for schizophrenia-spectrum or major mood disorders (n = 180) will be recruited from a psychiatric hospital and randomized to treatment-as-usual (TAU) plus standard discharge planning and aftercare (CHECK-IN) or TAU plus tFOCUS. tFOCUS is a 12-week intervention, consisting of: (a) a patient-facing mHealth smartphone app with daily self-assessment prompts and targeted coping strategies; (b) a clinician-facing web dashboard; and, (c) mHealth aftercare advisors, who will conduct brief post-hospital clinical calls with patients (e.g., safety concerns, treatment engagement) and encourage app use. Follow-ups will be conducted at 6-, 12-, and 24-weeks post-discharge to assess primary and secondary outcomes, as well as target mechanisms. We also will assess barriers and facilitators to future implementation of tFOCUS via qualitative interviews of stakeholders and input from a Community Advisory Board throughout the project.

CONCLUSIONS

Information gathered during this project, in combination with successful study outcomes, will inform a potential tFOCUS intervention scale-up across a range of psychiatric hospitals and healthcare systems.

CLINICALTRIALS

govregistration: NCT05703412.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of xanomeline for schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

We systematically reviewed extant studies evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of xanomeline and xanomeline-trospium (KarXT) for treatment of adults with schizophrenia.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, articles were systematically searched for in databases and clinical trial registries.

RESULTS

A total of 4 preclinical trials and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in this review. A 4-week RCT observed a difference of 24.0 points (SD 21.0) in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total score between xanomeline and placebo groups (p = 0.039). A 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -17.4 and -5.9 points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -11.6 points; 95% CI -16.1 to -7.1; p < 0.001; d = 0.75). Another 5-week RCT observed PANSS total score changes from baseline to week 5, including -21.2 (SE 1.7) and -11.6 (SE 1.6) points in KarXT and placebo groups, respectively (LSMD -9.6; 95% CI -13.9 to -5.2; p < 0.0001; d = 0.61). Side effects include constipation, nausea, vomiting, dyspepsia, and dry mouth.

CONCLUSION

KarXT offers an innovative non-D2 blocking approach, representing a promising treatment avenue for schizophrenia.

Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Gradual Onset Cannabis-Induced Psychosis Following the Consumption of Delta-8-Tetrahydrocannabinol

Cannabis-induced psychosis (CIP) is an increasingly acknowledged psychiatric phenomenon observed in vulnerable patients exposed to cannabis. This brief case report details a male patient in his 20s, who presents to the ED with derealization two days after ingesting a gummy worm containing delta-8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8-THC). Two days post-ED discharge, the patient gradually developed symptoms of religious-themed psychosis and was prescribed 10 mg of aripiprazole daily. The patient seemingly recovered within four days of starting treatment. This paper contributes to the limited literature pertaining to CIP and discusses implications for diagnostics and treatment in the ED setting.

Serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome: A case report of intersecting symptomatology

Introduction

Serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome are caused by 2 distinct pathologies; however, the clinical presentation associated with both syndromes share many features.

Methods

We describe a 56-year-old male patient who presented to our facility with seizures, leukocytosis, fevers, extremity hyperreflexia, and signs of autonomic dysfunction as evidenced by cardiovascular instability. The patient was noted to be taking vortioxetine, trazodone, lamotrigine, lurasidone, and carbidopa-levodopa as outpatient medications for his depression, an unspecified mood disorder, and Parkinson disease. Following a robust workup and failure of other therapies, all serotonergic and dopaminergic medications were held, and the patient was tried on cyproheptadine for serotonin syndrome, which led to the cessation of fevers. Bromocriptine was added to the regimen, which led to the resolution of the remainder of the patient's symptoms.

Results

The overlapping symptomatology of several key diagnostic criteria for both serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome as well as their nature as diagnoses of exclusion require an evaluation of the patient's aggregate improvement following targeted pharmacologic strategies for both syndromes. The efficacy of both cyproheptadine and bromocriptine when administered concomitantly support the concurrent pathologies.

Discussion

Clinicians at the bedside must be cognizant of the potential for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions that may present with overlapping pathologies.

[Metabolic syndrome and antipsychotic therapy of schizophrenia]

The review article discusses the relationship of metabolic disorders with schizophrenia and antipsychotic therapy, the importance of metabolic syndrome for the health of patients with schizophrenia. Risk factors for the development of metabolic syndrome are considered. The metabolic side effects of various antipsychotics are characterized. Options for therapeutic tactics in the development of metabolic syndrome against the background of antipsychotic therapy are described.

Olanzapine-Samidorphan for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objective

United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) recently approved a novel combination of olanzapine-samidorphan (OLZSAM) for managing olanzapine-associated adverse events (weight gain) in adult patients with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. To opine about the safety and efficacy of OLZSAM, authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to convene justifiable evidence.

Methods

A thorough literature search was performed through the databases Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov, from inception to September 2022, with the keywords: 'olanzapine and samidorphan' and schizophrenia; and "ALKS3831" and "lybalvi." Clinical trials published in English that analyzed the efficacy and safety of OLZSAM were included. The significant outcomes included in this study were change from baseline (CFB) in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) at the end of the study, the proportion of patients with weight gain at the end of the study, the proportion of patients with at least one adverse event, and the incidence of drug discontinuation due to adverse events.

Results

The change in PANSS score at the end of the study was comparable among groups receiving OLZSAM and olanzapine alone: standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.04; 95% CI = -0.09 to 0.17; p = 0.57. The OLZSAM group reported less incidence of weight gain: risk ratio (RR) = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.62-1.34; p = 0.63, and any adverse event: RR = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.90-1.09; p = 0.81. Drug discontinuation incidence was higher in the OLZSAM group: RR = 1.22; 95% CI = 0.84-1.79; p = 0.30.

Conclusions

The combination OLZSAM showed comparable efficacy to olanzapine alone in schizophrenia patients, with relatively less incidence of weight gain and adverse events; however, the drug discontinuation due to adverse events was more in the OLZSAM group.

Lower Risks of Gastrointestinal Perforation and Intestinal Obstruction in Patients with Atypical Antipsychotics in Comparison with Typical Antipsychotics Based on Real-World Data from the MID-NET® in Japan

Intestinal perforation and obstruction are known to be one of the adverse events caused by antipsychotics; however, warning information on package inserts varies among antipsychotics. To investigate the risks of gastrointestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics compared with those in patients prescribed typical antipsychotics, a nested case-control study was conducted utilizing real-world data from the MID-NET® medical information database in Japan. The study period spanned from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018. We found that the risks of gastrointestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics were significantly lower than those in patients prescribed typical antipsychotics (adjusted odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.80). This finding was supported with prolonged periods for the exposure definition in the sensitivity analyses. In addition, no major differences in the risks of atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, quetiapine, olanzapine, and aripiprazole, were identified in this study. The safety profile regarding the lower risks of gastrointestinal perforation and intestinal obstruction in patients prescribed atypical antipsychotics should be considered when choosing antipsychotics in clinical practice in terms of the proper use of such drugs.