Safety and Tolerability of Treatments for Allergic Rhinitis in Children

Developing Nanosuspension Loaded with Azelastine for Potential Nasal Drug Delivery: Determination of Proinflammatory Interleukin IL-4 mRNA Expression and Industrial Scale-Up Strategy

In order to increase bioavailability and intranasal absorbance, the current work set out to create azelastine nasal spray based on nanosuspension. Chondroitin was utilized as a polymer to prepare azelastine nanosuspension through the precipitation procedure. A size of 500 nm and a polydispersity index of 0.276 with a negative potential (-20 mV) were achieved. X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermal analysis including differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric analysis, in vitro release, and diffusion studies were used to characterize the optimized nanosuspension. MTT assay was used to assess the viability of the cells, and hemolysis assay was used to assess the blood compatibility. Using RNA extraction and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, the levels of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4, which is most closely related to cytokines in allergic rhinitis, were measured in mouse lungs. The drug dissolution and diffusion study indicated 2.0-fold increase compared to pure reference sample. Therefore, the azelastine nanosuspension could be suggested as a practical and simple nanosystem for intranasal delivery with improved permeability and bioavailability. The outcome obtained in this study indicated that azelastine nanosuspension has great potential to treat allergic rhinitis as intranasal treatment.

Quail egg homogenate with zinc as adjunctive therapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomised, controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Because most available treatments for managing seasonal allergic rhinitis show some side effects without reducing recurrence, natural anti-allergic products could represent an interesting treatment addition. This study aimed to analyse the efficacy and tolerance of quail egg as adjunctive therapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHOD

In a Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials compliant framework, patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis were prospectively randomised to receive mometasone nasal spray for four weeks or the same topical corticosteroid therapy plus commercially available oral quail egg and zinc tablets.

RESULTS

Forty patients were enrolled. The mometasone + quail egg and zinc tablets group showed a greater reduction in nasal itching, sneezing and total nasal symptom scores than the mometasone nasal spray only group. A higher proportion of participants in the mometasone + quail egg and zinc tablets group had good rhinitis control than in the mometasone nasal spray only group, with no need for rescue medications.

CONCLUSION

Despite the need for a further larger study, quail egg preliminarily appears to be an effective adjunct to topical steroid therapy in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Safety of intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis in children

INTRODUCTION

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, affecting about 10-40% of children worldwide. Intranasal corticosteroids (INCSs) are the first line anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of pediatric AR. The systemic and local adverse effects of INCSs in children with AR should be assessed.

AREAS COVERED

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting local and systemic adverse effects of INCSs in pediatric populations with AR were searched out of PubMed and Embase.

EXPERT OPINION

Overall, INCSs displayed a favorable safety profile and high local-systemic balance of bioavailability with a low incidence of adverse events in the treatment of AR children. Nevertheless, the use of INCSs should be designed depending on one patient's response and adverse effects. The benefits and risks of INCSs should be assessed to ensure the clinical efficacy and avoid the insidious events.

The Long-Term Effects of 12-Week Intranasal Steroid Therapy on Adenoid Size, Its Mucus Coverage and Otitis Media with Effusion: A Cohort Study in Preschool Children

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to analyse the long-term effects of a 12-week course of topical steroids on adenoid size and its mucus using endoscopy and on middle ear effusion measured by tympanometry.

METHODS

The study presents an endoscopic choanal assessment of the change in adenoid size (adenoid to choanae ratio, A/C ratio) and its mucus coverage in 165 children with Grade II and III adenoid hypertrophy three to six months after finishing a 12-week course of intranasal steroid treatment with mometasone furoate. Additionally, tympanometry was performed to measure middle ear effusion. Changes in the tympanograms were analysed.

RESULTS

The mean A/C ratio before treatment was 65.73%. Three to six months after finishing a 12-week course of intranasal steroid treatment, the mean A/C ratio decreased to 65.52%, although the change was not statistically significant (p = 0.743). There was no change in adenoid mucus according to the MASNA scale before and three to six months after the end of the steroid treatment (p = 0.894). Long-term observations of tympanograms before and three to six months after the end of the treatment did not show improvement (p = 0.428).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that there was no effect of topical steroids on adenoid size, its mucus and otitis media with effusion (OME) three to six months after finishing a 12-week course of treatment. In the light of performed study, decision of adenoidectomy and tympanostomy should not be procrastinated.

Fexofenadine: review of safety, efficacy and unmet needs in children with allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most common undiagnosed chronic condition in children. Moderate/severe AR symptoms significantly impair quality of life, and cause sleep disruption, absenteeism and decreased productivity. Additionally, untreated AR predisposes children to asthma and other chronic conditions. Although intranasal corticosteroids are the most effective pharmacologic treatment for AR, oral antihistamines are often preferred. First-generation antihistamines may be chosen to relieve AR symptoms as they are inexpensive and widely available; however, they cause sedative and cardiovascular negative effects due to poor receptor selectivity. Therefore, second-generation antihistamines were developed to reduce adverse effects while retaining efficacy. There are fewer clinical trials in children than adults, therefore, efficacy and safety data is limited, particularly in children under 6 years, highlighting the need to generate these data in young children with AR. Fexofenadine, a highly selective second-generation antihistamine, effectively alleviates symptoms of AR, is non-sedating due to decreased blood-brain barrier permeability, and is devoid of cardiovascular side effects. Importantly, fexofenadine relieves the ocular symptoms of allergic conjunctivitis, which occur concomitantly with AR, improving quality of life. Overall, fexofenadine displays a favorable safety profile and results in greater treatment satisfaction in children compared with other second-generation antihistamines. This review aimed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of fexofenadine with other available first- and second-generation antihistamines in children with AR.

Safety of Intranasal Steroids: an Updated Perspective

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intranasal corticosteroid sprays have been available as over-the-counter (OTC) medications since 2013. As such, clinicians need to be up-to-date with the risks and the safety of INS, as patients may have concerns and detailed questions. The following is a review of the recent medical literature regarding the safety profile, adverse reactions, and special populations using INS.

RECENT FINDINGS

The latest research on intranasal steroid sprays (INS) continue to confirm that INS rarely have significant local side effects, such as severe and persistent epistaxis. Recent studies looking at systemic side effects such as hypothalamic pituitary axis suppression, growth effects, and ocular effects do not indicate any new concerns nor have found significant differences from the past literature. The use of combination INS and topical antihistamine medications did not reveal any new safety issues. Use of INS with topical decongestants found some limited effects of tachyphylaxis and rebound congestion. Studies continue to support the use of newer INS for children and continued monitoring of growth in this population. The HIV population should avoid use of INS with the prescription of ritonavir, given demonstration of adrenal suppression. This updated perspective has found that newer generation INS should be used at the lowest effective dose for the selected population, that clinicians can inform patients using the OTC INS preparations that there are very few safety concerns, and that regular follow-up visits can provide further reassurance with physical examinations and address patient's questions. Future research regarding the safety of INS should study newer preparations when developed and if used in combination with other topical agents.

HMGB1 in the Pathogenesis of Nasal Inflammatory Diseases and its Inhibition as New Therapeutic Approach: A Review from the Literature

Introduction  This study is a systematic review on recent developments about the importance of HMGB1 protein in the pathogenesis of rhino-sinusal inflammatory diseases. We also report data on the use of 18-β-glycyrrhetic acid (GA), which has been shown able to inhibit the pro-inflammatory activities of HMGB1, in young patients affected by allergic rhinitis and complaining of nasal obstruction as main symptom.

Objectives  The objective of this study was to review the literature to demonstrate the importance of HMGB1 in the pathogenesis of nasal inflammatory disorders and understand whether the inhibition of this protein may be an efficacious and innovative therapeutic strategy for patients with rhino-sinusal inflammation.

Data Synthesis  Authors searched for pertinent articles indexed in PubMed, Scopus, and other health journals between 2004 and 2015.

In total, the authors gathered 258 articles: 219 articles through Pubmed and 39 articles from other search engines. The search terms used were as follows: HMGB1 AND “respiratory epithelium,” “airway inflammation,” “rhinitis,” “allergic rhinitis,” “rhinosinusitis,” “nasal polyposis,” “glycyrrhetic acid,” “children.”

Conclusions  Patients with severe symptoms have the highest serum levels and the highest extracellular expression of HMGB1. GA inhibits HMGB1 chemotactic and mitogenic function by a scavenger mechanism on extracellular HMGB1 accumulation stimulated by lipopolysaccharides in vitro. Treatment of allergic rhinitis with GA is not associated with local or systemic side effects in children and adults.

Drug use in French children: a population-based study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of drug use in outpatient children in France, a population-based study using a national reimbursement claims database representative of 90% of the French population was conducted.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study performed between January and December 2011 using the EGB database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires), a 1/97th sample of the national healthcare insurance system beneficiaries. Drug use in children <18 years old was estimated through reimbursements for prescribed drugs excluding vaccines. Prevalences of use were calculated for different levels of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification by considering as users children who had at least one reimbursement during the study period.

RESULTS

In 2011, 133,800 children were included in the study. The overall prevalence of drug use was 84% and the median number of different drugs per child was 5. Drug use was greatest in children aged <2 years. The most widely used drugs were paracetamol, systemic anti-infectives, nasal corticosteroids and decongestants, and anti-histamines. 21% children <2 years received domperidone.

CONCLUSIONS

There is widespread use of medicines that are unlikely to be effective and may have significant toxicity in French children. Irrational use of medicines appears to be greatest in children aged 5 years and under.

Current recommendations and emerging options for the treatment of allergic rhinitis

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is one of the most common diseases and represents a global health problem, currently affecting up to 30% of the general population, with a continuously increasing prevalence and significant comorbidities and complications. The aim of this review is to provide an update on AR treatment, with a focus on current therapies defined by AR and its impact on asthma guidelines and with a particular emphasis on new and future therapeutic perspectives.

Allergic Rhinitis in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial Targeted at Symptoms

Allergic rhinitis (AR) underlies many symptoms and complications which severely affect children's quality of life. This two-arm study aimed at evaluate the efficacy and safety of the medical device Narivent(®) versus topical corticosteroids in the symptomatic management of allergic rhinitis in paediatric patients. A randomized study was conducted. Forty subjects with a diagnosis of allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive one puff of Narivent(®) into each nostril twice daily for 30 days (n = 20) or to receive one puff of topical intranasal corticosteroid into each nostril twice daily for 30 days (n = 20). In both treatment arms, severity of major symptoms related to AR, including nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, sneezing and nasal itching, was assessed subjectively on a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale. Nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea and sneezing improved significantly after 30 days of treatment with Narivent(®). Similarly, in topical steroids group severity of all subjective symptoms decreased significantly. Narivent(®) appears to be efficacious in treating nasal congestion and other major symptoms in children with AR over a 30-day period, showing comparable results to intranasal corticosteroids therapy but with a better safety profile.

An overview of the pediatric medications for the symptomatic treatment of allergic rhinitis, cough, and cold

Upper respiratory infections and allergic rhinitis are common diseases in children. In recent years, U.S. Food and Drug Administration has been promoting pediatric drug development with marketing exclusivity incentives and requirements. The assessment of clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety data has facilitated pediatric drug development and provided appropriate labeling for pediatric use. Regulatory decision making involves multiple evaluation processes, including drug exposure comparison between adult and pediatric population, formulation bridging, dose selection, and evaluation of efficacy and safety in pediatric patients. This article reviews the pediatric drugs indicated for cough, cold, and allergic rhinitis, focusing on the utility of clinical pharmacology, safety, and efficacy data in determining the pediatric dosing regimen and the approaches taken for regulatory decision making.

A single-centre, before-after study of the short- and long-term efficacy of Narivent(®) in the treatment of nasal congestion

OBJECTIVE

Nasal congestion is a common symptom in allergic and nonallergic rhinitis, rhinosinusitis and nasal polyposis. The present study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of Narivent(®), an osmotically-acting medical device with anti oedematous and anti-inflammatory effects, in nasal congestion.

METHODS

A single-centre, prospective study with a pre- post design and consecutive patient enrolment was conducted in an Italian otolaryngology department. Patients with persistent nasal congestion were allocated to treatment groups as follows: group 1 (n = 36) treated for 7 days; group 2 (n = 56) treated for 30 days. In each group, patients received two puffs of Narivent(®) into each nostril twice daily. Symptom severity was assessed subjectively on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, and objectively by the presence/absence of signs and symptoms. Differences in subjective and objective severity measures before and after treatment were compared using Wilcoxon's signed rank test.

RESULTS

All symptoms and objective scores improved after treatment with Narivent(®) for 7 or 30 days and no adverse effects were reported by the patients in either group.

CONCLUSION

Narivent(®) appears to be efficacious in treating nasal congestion over a 7- or a 30-day period.

Effect of intranasal steroids on glucose and hemoglobin A1c levels in diabetic patients

BACKGROUND

Intranasal steroids are widely used for the treatment of inflammatory diseases of the nose and sinuses such as rhinosinusitis, allergic rhinitis, and nonallergic rhinitis. Along with the general otherwise healthy population, many diabetic patients use intranasal steroids as well. This study was designed to evaluate the adverse effects of long-term treatment with intranasal corticosteroid preparations in diabetic patients.

METHODS

The study group included all diabetic patients treated with intranasal steroids for at least 3 months at primary care clinics in Clalit Health Services Central District in Israel in 2002-2007. The central database had been reviewed for demographic data, medical history, medications, and laboratory test results.

RESULTS

A total of 1768 diabetic patients were treated with topical nasal steroid sprays during the study period. Data on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels both before and during steroid treatment was available for 245 patients, and data on fasting serum glucose levels at both time points was available for 163 patients. On statistical analysis, there was no change in either measure from baseline to 3 months after starting treatment (p = 0.104 and p = 0.101, respectively). Treatment with triamcinolone acetonide was associated with a significantly greater increase in fasting serum glucose levels than other preparations (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Intranasal corticosteroids seem to have no adverse effects on HbA1c and serum glucose levels in diabetic patients. Their long-term use appears to be safe, provided that the patients are carefully monitored, especially those receiving triamcinolone acetonide.

Safety, Tolerability, and Exposure of Ciclesonide Nasal Spray in Healthy and Asymptomatic Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Ciclesonide is an intranasal corticosteroid in development for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. To assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ciclesonide, adult healthy volunteers and asymptomatic subjects with seasonal allergic rhinitis were randomized to receive intranasal ciclesonide or placebo for 14 days. Serum concentrations of ciclesonide and its active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide, were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography assay with tandem mass spectrometric detection, with lower limits of quantification of 25 and 10 pg/mL, respectively. Adrenal function was monitored by diurnal serum free and 24-hour urine cortisol concentrations. Despite the use of a sensitive assay and a high ciclesonide dose (800 microg/d), serum levels of ciclesonide and desisobutyryl-ciclesonide were below the lower limits of quantification for the majority of samples assayed. Ciclesonide was well tolerated and did not appear to affect serum or urine free cortisol levels. The low systemic exposure and favorable safety profile support the continued clinical development of ciclesonide nasal spray.

Nasal obstruction as a key symptom in allergic rhinitis: efficacy and safety of a medical device in children

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem that has increased rapidly in prevalence over the past few decades. Nasal congestion, which represents a cardinal symptom of AR, appears to be difficult to treat and, especially for pediatric population, therapies that are both well tolerated and effective in relieving nasal congestion are needed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and clinical effectiveness of the medical device (lactoferrin, carboximetil β-glucan, D-panthenol, dipotassium glycyrrhizinate) in reducing the allergic rhinitis symptoms.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective study with a pre-post design was performed consecutively enrolling 100 pediatric patients of both genders affected by persistent AR. Patients received 2 puffs into each nostril 2 times a day over the course of 4 weeks. The severity of AR symptoms, as measured by VAS score, was assessed before and after treatment. The main outcomes were improvement in each symptom score and in overall symptom burden (as measured by average symptom scores). Differences in symptoms scores measured before and after treatment were compared using paired-sample Wilcoxon signed rank test. The proportion of participants with adverse effects attributed to the treatment was also computed.

RESULTS

All considered symptoms, including nasal congestion, significantly improve after treatment (p<0.001), while only 9 patients suffered adverse effects (itch, burning sensation, dryness).

CONCLUSION

These results confirm the efficacy and safety of this medical device in pediatric population.

Salivary cortisol levels in prepubertal children using inhaled corticosteroids with or without concurrent intranasal corticosteroids

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and intranasal steroids (INS) are frequently co-administered in children with asthma and rhinitis. In contrast to monotherapy with ICS or INS, little is known about the safety of concurrent use of topical steroids on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function in prepubertal children.

OBJECTIVE

Comparison of morning salivary cortisol levels in prepubertal children using maintenance treatment with ICS with and without concurrent use of INS to steroid naïve control groups (healthy children, and children with constipation who are under pediatric care).

METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study in prepubertal children (6-12 years) using ICS alone (n = 41) or in combination with INS (n = 22), compared to different control groups with no steroid treatment (18 healthy children, and 28 children with constipation). Morning salivary cortisol levels were determined from saliva samples collected at home.

RESULTS

The morning salivary cortisol levels of the healthy children (8.7 nmol/L; 95% CI 5.9-18.8), and the children with constipation (8.9 nmol/L; 8.0-11.3) were comparable. The salivary cortisol levels of prepubertal children using ICS (median 4.7 nmol/L; 95% CI 4.6-6.9) or a combination of ICS and INS (5.1 nmol/L; 4.2-7.6) were comparable, but significantly reduced compared to both control groups. There was no correlation between salivary cortisol level and age, duration of disease, or cumulative daily dose of topical steroids.

CONCLUSION

Salivary cortisol levels in prepubertal children using ICS, with or without concurrent use of INS, were comparable. However, salivary cortisol levels were significantly reduced compared to steroid naïve controls, irrespective of the cumulative daily dose of topical steroids. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2011; 46:1055-1061. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Lack of bone metabolism side effects after 3 years of nasal topical steroids in children with allergic rhinitis

This study evaluated the effects on bone mineral status of long-term treatment with intranasal budesonide (INB) spray, using the recommended dose, in pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). This retrospective, case-control study of 230 prepubertal children with perennial AR, who had used nasal budesonide at a mean daily dose of 100 μg (range, 89-132 μg) for at least 3 years intermittently, was conducted from May 2007 through May 2010. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Levels of serum calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), parathyroid hormone, and osteocalcin were also assessed. The results were compared to sex- and age-matched controls (n = 140), who were newly diagnosed children with AR without any corticosteroid treatment. The 230 study patients (145 boys) were aged from 7 to 11 years. The average age (± SEM) was 8.7 ± 0.7 years; the mean (± SEM) steroid dosage used was 73.5 ± 7.0 μg daily, with 65.2 ± 5.2 g total steroid use during treatment. The 140 control patients (90 boys) were aged from 6 to 11 years. No significant differences were observed in BMD (P > 0.05) between the study and the control groups. Although mean serum ALP level was higher, and cortisol, phosphorus, and osteocalcin levels were lower, in the treatment group, these differences were not statistically significant. The findings suggest that long-term intermittent treatment for 3 years with INB spray, 50 μg twice daily, for children with perennial rhinitis revealed no negative effect on BMD and associated parameters.

Lack of ocular side effects after 2 years of topical steroids for allergic rhinitis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate ocular side effects in children with allergic rhinitis taking chronic intermittent nasal corticosteroids.

METHODS

The study group included 150 children who had used intermittent intranasal budesonide for more than 2 years for allergic rhinitis. Ninety patients who were newly diagnosed as having allergic rhinitis without any treatment comprised the control group. Central corneal thickness, Schirmer test results, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, cataract formation, keratometry, and tear break-up time were compared in the two groups.

RESULTS

The ages of the 150 study patients (85 boys) were between 8 and 15 years. The average age (± standard error of the mean [SEM]) was 11.7 ± 0.7 years and the mean (± SEM) steroid dosage used was 93.3 ± 7.0 μg daily with 42.2 ± 3.2 g total steroid use during treatment. The ages of the 90 control patients (54 boys) were between 7 and 15 years. There was no statistically significant difference between the study and control groups according to ocular findings (P > .05). Eye functions including cataract formation, corneal ectasia, ocular hypertension or glaucoma, and dry eye were not observed in any of the patients in the study group and were not correlated with total steroid dosage (r = 0.125, P = .447).

CONCLUSION

A 2-year treatment of children with allergic rhinitis prescribed intermittent intranasal budesonide at an average daily dose of approximately 100 μg is not associated with ocular side effects such as cataract, glaucoma, corneal ectasia, and abnormal tear function.

Efficacy and long-term safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in children with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects up to 40% of children by age 6 years. Perennial AR (PAR) causes sleep disturbance, diminishes concentration in school, impairs psychosocial functioning, and reduces quality of life. This study evaluated efficacy and long-term safety of the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in children with PAR.

METHODS

This study comprised a double-blind, 4-week efficacy and safety period followed by a 6-month, open-label safety period. Primary efficacy variable during the double-blind period was mean change in physician-evaluated total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from baseline to day 15. Other efficacy variables during this phase included subject-evaluated TNSS, individual nasal symptoms, and total symptom score (TSS, nasal and non-nasal symptoms, summed). Physician-evaluated improvement in overall condition of PAR was assessed during the open-label period. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout.

RESULTS

Subjects aged 3-11 years with PAR (n = 381) were randomized to MFNS 100 microg (n = 190) or placebo (n = 191) daily for 4 weeks; 357 subjects continued into the open-label period, receiving MFNS only. Between baseline and day 15, significantly greater mean changes were seen with MFNS-treated patients than placebo in physician-evaluated TNSS (-2.8, -39%, vs. -2.2, -32%; p = 0.02). Statistically significant improvements in MFNS versus placebo were reported for subject-evaluated TNSS, TSS, and individual nasal symptom scores (p < or = 0.03 for all). Improvement continued through the open-label period. Subjects treated with MFNS in both periods experienced a 45% further reduction in TSS in this study phase, while those who switched from placebo to MFNS saw a further 49% decrease. MFNS was well-tolerated in both periods. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs during the double-blind period for MFNS and placebo, respectively, were epistaxis, seven (4%) and nine (5%); sneezing, five (3%) and seven (4%); headache, six (3%) and five (3%). During the open-label period, the AEs reported most often were epistaxis 37 (10%), headache nine (3%), and rhinitis 12 (3%).

LIMITATIONS

Studies in children present unique challenges because subjects are too young to grasp subjective concepts such as symptom severity, especially as rated on a numbered scale. In addition, the 6-month extension of the placebo-controlled phase used a single agent. It is also possible that subjects' symptoms could have abated independent of mometasone furoate treatment.

CONCLUSION

MFNS 100 microg/day effectively reduces TNSS, TSS (including ocular symptoms), and individual symptoms associated with PAR and is well-tolerated for up to 6 months in children aged 3-11 years with a safety profile similar to placebo.

Corticosteroid treatment in chronic rhinosinusitis: the possibilities and the limits

Chronic rhinosinusitis, including nasal polyps, is an inflammatory disease of the nose and sinuses. The medical treatment, mainly topical intranasal and oral corticosteroids, constitutes its first line of therapy. Long-term treatment with corticosteroid nasal spray reduces inflammation and nasal polyp size, and improves nasal symptoms such as nasal blockage, rhinorrea, and the loss of smell. Corticosteroid intranasal drops may be used when intranasal spray fails to demonstrate efficacy. Short courses of oral steroids are recommended in severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps or when a rapid symptomatic improvement is needed. Endoscopic sinus surgery is only recommended when the medical treatment fails. Intranasal corticosteroids should be continued postoperatively. When using intranasal corticosteroids, care should be taken in selected populations such as children, pregnant women, and elderly patients; especially in those patients with comorbid conditions such as asthma, in which the overall steroid intake can be high due to the administration of both intranasal and inhaled corticosteroids.

The Effects of Serum and Urinary Cortisol Levels of Topical Intranasal Irrigations with Budesonide Added to Saline in Patients with Recurrent Polyposis after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Background

The delivery of topical intranasal corticosteroid sprays has traditionally been the primary method of treating recurrent nasal polyposis. An emerging treatment for polyposis is budesonide nasal irrigations. Delivered at concentrations nearly 100 times greater than found in prescription nasal sprays, there have been little studies on the effects of budesonide irrigation on the adrenal axis. Therefore, we investigated whether irrigation with budesonide solution was associated with any increase in serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol levels.

Methods

Patients who previously had undergone endoscopic sinus surgery and were not taking prednisone for 3 months were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients irrigated twice daily with 0.5 mg/2 mL of budesonide mixed with 240 mL of saline solution. Serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol were collected before drug administration and 6 weeks after continuous use.

Results

Ten patients completed this study. The average serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol before drug administration were 9.8 ± 5.4 μg/dL and 28.1 ± 15.1 μg/24 hours, respectively. After 6-week follow-up, the average serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol were 12.8 ± 3.5 μg/dL and 16.5 ± 5.6 μg/24 hours, respectively. Normal ranges for serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol are 5–25 μg/dL and 4–50 μg/24 hours, respectively. Conclusions: Irrigation with budesonide, 0.5 mg/2 mL, in 250 mL of saline solution does not result in decreases of serum cortisol and 24-hour urinary cortisol levels. Based on this, we feel irrigation with budesonide solution is safe to perform in patients as an alternative to traditional aerosolized steroid sprays or systemic corticosteroids.

Daily versus self-adjusted dosing of topical mometasone furoate nasal spray in patients with allergic rhinitis: randomised, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Many patients with allergic rhinitis are reluctant to use daily intranasal steroids for prolonged periods. A self-adjusted regimen which delivers reasonable control of allergic rhinitis may be more acceptable to such patients.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of daily use of mometasone furoate nasal spray, versus a self-adjusted regimen, in patients with chronic allergic rhinitis, in terms of symptom control and nasal volume change.

SETTING

Ambulatory visits in an office setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty patients with chronic allergic rhinitis were randomised: 30 were prescribed mometasone furoate nasal spray once daily for six weeks, while 30 were prescribed the same spray daily for one week, every alternate day for one week and then on a self-adjusted regimen for four weeks. Patients kept a symptom diary documenting sneezing, rhinorrhoea, nasal blockage and nasal itching. Acoustic rhinometry was used to measure the total nasal cavity volume at the first visit and at the end of the treatment period.

RESULTS

The total nasal score on treatment days showed an improvement in both groups, compared with baseline measurements. There was no significant difference in total nasal scores between the two groups, except on days 10 (p = 0.043), 20 (p = 0.008), 23 (p = 0.19), 30 (p = 0.008) and 37 (p = 0.000), when the daily group's total nasal score was significantly lower than the self-adjusted group's total nasal score, and on day 8 (p = 0.004), when the self-adjusted group's total nasal score was significantly lower than the daily group's total nasal score. Total nasal cavity volume significantly increased in both groups (p = 0.0001), with no statistically significant difference between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-adjusted dosage of mometasone furoate nasal spray gives reasonable control of allergic rhinitis (albeit with some 'breakthrough' symptoms). Patients should learn how to control these symptoms with the least number of steroid doses.

Nasal steroid perspective: knowledge and attitudes

Intranasal corticosteroids (INCSs) seem to be the best medication available to control and eliminate symptoms of allergic rhinitis. However, the amounts of nasal steroids prescribed and used were not directly proportional to the number of allergic rhinitis cases in Turkey. Herein, we aimed to clarify the unexpectedly low prescription and use of INCSs in Turkey by checking the outlook of patients' and physicians' perspectives. The patients' perspective on oral and nasal steroids was evaluated with a custom-designed questionnaire drawn up specifically for this preliminary study. The physicians' perspective on prescribing nasal steroids was evaluated with the data obtained from the IMS Health Turkey reports. The findings we obtained in this survey by analyzing data from the self-administered questionnaires showed that among these young people, oral and nasal steroids were on the whole well-known drugs. Hence, even though steroids in general are well-known drugs, the young people we surveyed mainly remained uninformed about their safety. The incidence of using nasal steroids if prescribed is higher than the one with oral steroids; that may be due to the lack of knowledge about nasal steroids. The analysis of the IMS Health Turkey data for nasal steroid prescriptions between 2005 and 2008 shows that the market share has increased steadily. The role of INCSs in the treatment of allergic rhinitis is increasingly being recognized as an appropriate and effective treatment option. However, patients' and parents' concerns over the safety of INCS therapy have frequently resulted in their being positioned as a second-line treatment choice. Physicians need to be aware that patients may have a significant information gap. Instructing the family and caregivers about the correct use of INCS therapy is an important part of treatment.

Pediatric allergy medications: review of currently available formulations

BACKGROUND

Allergy affects about 50% of the pediatric population globally. Allergic rhinitis (AR), one form of allergy, causes considerable impairment in quality of life, including disruption of sleep and, in children, interference with school attendance and performance.

SCOPE

Traditional formulations and delivery systems - tablets, capsules, or intranasal sprays - successfully used by adults for treatment of AR may not be as easily administered in children. Liquid oral medications are more readily taken by children but contain sugars and excipients; they can also be inconvenient with less accurate dosing and are associated with dental caries and gastrointestinal upset.

METHODOLOGY

This review evaluated medications for treatment of AR currently available for pediatric patients and identified the attitudes of parents and health care professionals toward these medications. Guidelines from international organizations and governmental websites were reviewed for recommendations and product labeling requirements. A Medline search was conducted using the terms dyes, excipients, palatability, prescribing habits, sugar, among others.

FINDINGS

In recent years, governmental regulatory agencies and professional organizations in Europe and the United States have recommended avoidance of sugar in pediatric medicines and required stricter labeling of their ingredients. Public awareness about the adverse effects of sugar and some excipients has also increased, and parents more frequently express the desire for safer and more convenient medicines for their children. In response, more sugar-free, dye-free liquid medicines and other formulations, such as granules, filmstrips, chewable tablets, fast-dissolving tablets, and drops, are becoming available for pediatric use.

LIMITATIONS

Data from well-designed trials conducted in children for the treatment of AR are lacking. In addition, the possibility of a social response bias may exist for parents and physicians about sugar and other ingredients in children's medications.

CONCLUSION

Treatment for AR is often long-term, particularly in persistent AR; therefore, safety, tolerability, convenience, and patient/parental acceptance are important considerations when deciding which medication to prescribe.

Can intranasal corticosteroids cause migraine-like headache?

Intranasal corticosteroids (INCs) act predominantly locally and are considered to exert minimal systemic effects. On reviewing the international data collected in the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance programme an unexpected cluster was found of 38 case reports of migraine in suspected connection with INCs. These reports came from five countries (May 2007) and concerned six different drugs. In all reports the INC was the sole suspect drug. In nine cases re-exposure to the drug had taken place, leading to the recurrence of the event in eight of these patients. However, INCs are mainly used for rhinitis, and there is a known connection between rhinitis and migraine. Although representing only 0.6% of the total of case reports, international pharmacovigilance data suggest that the use of INCs may cause or trigger migraine or migraine-like headache. Further study is needed to determine if the reported association is true or not and, if so, what the possible mechanism is.

The pathophysiology, clinical impact, and management of nasal congestion in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Nasal congestion is a cardinal symptom of allergic rhinitis (AR). It is difficult to treat and is associated with decreased quality of life.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the clinical features of nasal congestion, its complex pathophysiology in the context of AR, its clinical impact, and the strengths and weaknesses of available treatments.

METHODS

Primary studies and reviews in the peer-reviewed, English-language literature were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-2008) and the Cochrane Library (1996-2008) using the terms nasal congestion, allergic rhinitis, pathophysiology, quality of life, and burden. Additional references were obtained by searching the reference lists of the identified articles. Abstracts from the 2006 and 2007 meetings of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology were also searched. Pertinent articles were included in the review if they were recently published and patient-focused, and if their authors were recognized leaders in the field.

RESULTS

A survey of 2355 patients with AR or their guardians found that almost half of respondents rated nasal congestion the most bothersome symptom; in a survey of 2500 adults with AR, 78% rated nasal congestion either extremely or moderately bothersome. Histamine and leukotrienes are major mediators of the allergic inflammation associated with nasal congestion, as indicated by reductions in nasal cross-sectional area in response to histamine challenge (P<0.001) and increases in nasal airway resistance in response to leukotriene challenge (P<0.05).Therapy for nasal congestion in AR is often hampered by limitations associated with the individual agents; for example, decongestants are effective in the control of nasal congestion, but their use is restricted by their adverse-event profiles. A meta-analysis of 16 controlled studies involving 2267 patients with AR found that intranasal corticosteroids provided significantly greater relief of nasal congestion than oral antihistamines (95% CI for combined standardized mean difference, -0.73 to -0.53). The results of several clinical trials have suggested that leukotriene-receptor antagonists may be associated with reduced nasal congestion; however, no agents in this class are currently approved for the treatment of nasal congestion in AR.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for therapies that are well tolerated and effective in relieving nasal congestion in AR.

Optimal management of nasal congestion caused by allergic rhinitis in children: safety and efficacy of medical treatments

Nasal congestion is such a frequent and multifactorial occurrence in young children that parents and medical caregivers often overlook the need for medical intervention. However, children with congestion can suffer quality-of-life detriments resulting from sleep disturbance, learning impairment, and fatigue. Congestion also impairs the normal nasal breathing that is physiologically important for the efficient cleaning and conditioning of inspired air. Further, the most common cause of congestion, allergic rhinitis, is considered a potential risk factor for asthma. Published guidelines on the treatment of allergic rhinitis agree that management strategies in children should follow the same principles as in adults, while recognizing the need for dosage adjustments and being aware of unique safety issues. Intranasal corticosteroids, with robust effects in reducing congestion and good tolerability, remain a treatment of choice. Despite lingering concerns about the potential for growth suppression with these drugs, clinical evidence suggests a very low risk at prescribed dosages, especially with compounds that have a low systemic bioavailability. Oral antihistamines are commonly cited as first-line options for allergic rhinitis, although their effect on nasal congestion is relatively modest. First-generation antihistamines should not be administered to children because of their sedative properties, which can worsen learning problems associated with allergic rhinitis. Second-generation oral antihistamines are preferred, although this class is not completely devoid of adverse effects. Other treatments, such as a nasal antihistamine, decongestants, and immunotherapy, present varying levels of safety and tolerability issues in children.

Randomised, crossover clinical trial, in healthy volunteers, to compare the systemic availability of two topical intranasal budesonide formulations

BACKGROUND

Budesonide has a long history as intranasal drug, with many marketed products. Efforts should be made to demonstrate the therapeutic equivalence and safety comparability between them. Given that systemic availability significantly varies from formulations, the clinical comparability of diverse products comes to be of clinical interest and a regulatory requirement. The aim of the present study was to compare the systemic availability, pharmacodynamic effect, and safety of two intranasal budesonide formulations for the treatment of rhinitis.

METHODS

Eighteen healthy volunteers participated in this randomised, controlled, crossover, clinical trial. On two separated days, subjects received a single dose of 512 mug budesonide (4 puffs per nostril) from each of the assayed devices (Budesonida nasal 64(R), Aldo-Union, Spain and Rhinocort 64(R), AstraZeneca, Spain). Budesonide availability was determined by the measurement of budesonide plasma concentration. The pharmacodynamic effect on the hypothalamic-adrenal axis was evaluated as both plasma and urine cortisol levels. Adverse events were tabulated and described. Budesonide availability between formulations was compared by the calculation of 90%CI intervals of the ratios of the main pharmacokinetic parameters describing budesonide bioavailability. Plasma cortisol concentration-time curves were compared by means of a GLM for Repeated Measures. Urine cortisol excretion between formulations was compared through the Wilcoxon's test.

RESULTS

All the enrolled volunteers successfully completed the study. Pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable in terms of AUC(t) (2.6 +/- 1.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.7), AUC(i) (2.9 +/- 1.5 vs 2.4 +/- 0.7), t(max) (0.4 +/- 0.1 vs 0.4 +/- 0.2), C(max)/AUC(i) (0.3 +/- 0.1 vs 0.3 +/- 0.0), and MRT (5.0 +/- 1.4 vs 4.5 +/- 0.6), but not in the case of C(max) (0.9 +/- 0.3 vs 0.7 +/- 0.2) and t(1/2) (3.7 +/- 1.8 vs 2.9 +/- 0.4). The pharmacodynamic effects, measured as the effect over plasma and urine cortisol, were also comparables between both formulations. No severe adverse events were reported and tolerance was comparable between formulations.

CONCLUSION

The systemic availability of intranasal budesonide was comparable for both formulations in terms of most pharmacokinetic parameters. The pharmacodynamic effect on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis was also similar. Side effects were scarce and equivalent between the two products. This methodology to compare different budesonide-containing devices is reliable and easy to perform, and should be recommended for similar products intented to be marketed or already on the market.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

No Eudra CT: 2005-003727-39.

Montelukast in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: an evidence-based review

Cysteinyl-leukotrienes (CysLTs) are endogenous mediators of inflammation and play an important role in allergic airway disease by stimulating bronchoconstriction, mucus production, mucosal oedema and inflammation, airway infiltration by eosinophils, and dendritic cell maturation that prepares for future allergic response. Montelukast inhibits these actions by blocking type 1 CysLT receptors found on immunocytes, smooth muscle and endothelium in the respiratory mucosa. Initially developed as a treatment for asthma, montelukast has more recently found use in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). We conducted a systematic review of studies that have evaluated montelukast in the treatment of seasonal AR (SAR) and perennial AR (PAR), with and without concomitant asthma. Primary consideration was given to large, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trials in which AR endpoints were assessed and the use of concurrent treatments for AR was excluded. Eight such studies were found in the literature. The primary endpoint in these was daytime nasal symptom severity represented by a composite score derived from individual self-ratings of nasal congestion, rhinorrhoea, nasal pruritus and sneezing. Secondary endpoints have included these individual nasal symptom scores, additional scores for eye, ear and throat symptoms, the impact of rhinitis on quality of sleep, global evaluations of outcome by patients and physicians, and measures of the severity of concomitant asthma. A general outcome was that patients treated with montelukast had significantly greater improvements in their symptoms of SAR and PAR than did patients who were given a placebo. As monotherapy, montelukast exhibited efficacy similar to that of loratadine, but less than that of the intranasally administered corticosteroid fluticasone propionate. The use of montelukast in combination with antihistamines such as loratadine or cetirizine has generally resulted in greater efficacy than when these agents were used alone, and in some studies has produced results comparable with intranasally applied corticosteroids. In patients with AR comorbid with asthma, montelukast treatment has resulted in significant improvements in both, compared with placebo. Montelukast is well tolerated and has a favourable safety profile; adverse events have occurred at similar frequencies in patients taking either montelukast or placebo. Montelukast provides an effective and well tolerated oral treatment for allergic airway inflammation in patients with SAR or PAR without asthma, and in patients in whom AR is comorbid with asthma.

A novel N-chlorotaurine-corticosteroid combination as a preservative-free local disinfectant: influence on the ciliary beat frequency in vitro

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of N-chlorotaurine (NCT) and a corticosteroid seems to be a very promising substance for the local therapy of ENT infections. As it can be used without any preservatives, the effect on the ciliary beat frequency (CBF) is much less than that of products containing benzalkonium chloride (BAC). The in vitro results obtained in this study encourage us to perform clinical trials on this novel combination for intranasal application.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of a novel mixture of NCT and a corticosteroid [fluticasone propionate (FP)] on the CBF of human ciliated cells in vitro.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was designed as an in vitro study. CBF was measured by means of a photometric technique involving the combination of a light microscope, a photometer, a photographic multiplier and a computerized analyzing unit.

RESULTS

The combination of 1% NCT + 0.5 mg/ml FP decreased the CBF to 42.17% of its original value after 20 min. Treatment with BAC lowered the CBF depending on the concentration to 96.61% of its original value with 0.04 mg/ml, to 91.90% with 0.1 mg/ml, to 63.46% with 0.2 mg/ml and to 0% with 0.5 mg/ml. After rinsing in saline, the CBF of samples treated with 1% NCT + 0.5 mg/ml FP recovered to 68.93% of its original value.