Efficacy and Safety of Vamorolone Over 48 Weeks in Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Vamorolone is a dissociative agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor that has shown similar efficacy and reduced safety concerns in comparison with prednisone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of vamorolone over 48 weeks and to study crossover participants (prednisone to vamorolone; placebo to vamorolone).

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and prednisone-controlled clinical trial of 2 doses of vamorolone was conducted in participants with DMD, in the ages from 4 years to younger than 7 years at baseline. The interventions were 2 mg/kg/d of vamorolone and 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone for 48 weeks (period 1: 24 weeks + period 2: 24 weeks) and 0.75 mg/kg/d of prednisone and placebo for the first 24 weeks (before crossover). Efficacy was evaluated through gross motor outcomes and safety through adverse events, growth velocity, body mass index (BMI), and bone turnover biomarkers. This analysis focused on period 2.

RESULTS

A total of 121 participants with DMD were randomized. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed maintenance of improvement for all motor outcomes to week 48 (e.g., for primary outcome, time to stand from supine [TTSTAND] velocity, week 24 least squares mean [LSM] [SE] 0.052 [0.0130] rises/s vs week 48 LSM [SE] 0.0446 [0.0138]). After 48 weeks, vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d showed similar improvements as 6 mg/kg/d for North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) (vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d-vamorolone 2 mg/kg/d LSM [SE] 0.49 [1.14]; 95% CI -1.80 to 2.78, p = 0.67), but less improvement for other motor outcomes. The placebo to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group showed rapid improvements after 20 weeks of treatment approaching benefit seen with 48-week 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone treatment for TTSTAND, time to run/walk 10 m, and NSAA. There was significant improvement in linear growth after crossover in the prednisone to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group, and rapid reversal of prednisone-induced decline in bone turnover biomarkers in both crossover groups. There was an increase in BMI after 24 weeks of treatment that then stabilized for both vamorolone groups.

DISCUSSION

Improvements of motor outcomes seen with 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone at 24 weeks of treatment were maintained to 48 weeks of treatment. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed better maintenance of effect compared with vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d for most (3/5) motor outcomes. Bone morbidities of prednisone (stunting of growth and declines in serum bone biomarkers) were reversed when treatment transitioned to vamorolone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03439670.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class I evidence that for boys with DMD, the efficacy of vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d was maintained over 48 weeks.

Phase 1 trial of vamorolone, a first-in-class steroid, shows improvements in side effects via biomarkers bridged to clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Glucocorticoid drugs are highly effective anti-inflammatory agents, but chronic use is associated with extensive pharmacodynamic safety concerns that have a considerable negative impact on patient quality of life.

PURPOSE

Vamorolone (VBP15) is a first-in-class steroidal multi-functional drug that shows potent inhibition of pro-inflammatory NFkB pathways via high-affinity binding to the glucocorticoid receptor, high affinity antagonism for the mineralocorticoid receptor, and membrane stabilization properties. Pre-clinical data in multiple mouse models of inflammation showed retention of anti-inflammatory efficacy, but loss of most or all side effects.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

We report first-in-human Phase 1 clinical trials (86 healthy adult males), with single ascending doses (0.1-20.0 mg/kg), and multiple ascending doses (1.0-20 mg/kg/day; 14 days treatment).

KEY RESULTS

Vamorolone was well-tolerated at all dose levels. Vamorolone showed pharmacokinetic and metabolism profiles similar to prednisone. Biomarker studies showed loss of side effects of traditional glucocorticoid drugs (bone fragility, metabolic disturbance, immune suppression). Suppression of the adrenal axis was 10-fold less than prednisone. The crystallographic structure of vamorolone was solved, and compared to prednisone and dexamethasone. There was overlap in structure, but differences in conformation at the C-ring where glucocorticoids interact with Asn564 of the glucocorticoid receptor. The predicted loss of Asn564 binding to vamorolone may underlie the loss of gene transcriptional activity.

CONCLUSIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS

Vamorolone is a dissociative steroid that retains high affinity binding and nuclear translocation of both glucocorticoid (agonist) and mineralocorticoid (antagonist) receptors, but does not show pharmacodynamic safety concerns of existing glucocorticoid drugs at up to 20 mg/kg/day.

The corticosteroid compounds prednisolone and vamorolone do not alter the nociception phenotype and exacerbate liver injury in sickle cell mice

Clinicians often hesitate prescribing corticosteroids to treat corticosteroid-responsive conditions in sickle cell disease (SCD) patients because their use can be associated with complications (increased hospital readmission, rebound pain, strokes, avascular necrosis, acute chest syndrome). Consequently, SCD patients may receive suboptimal treatment for corticosteroid-responsive conditions. We conducted a preclinical trial of dissociative (vamorolone) and conventional (prednisolone) corticosteroid compounds to evaluate their effects on nociception phenotype, inflammation, and organ dysfunction in SCD mice. Prednisolone and vamorolone had no significant effects on nociception phenotype or anemia in homozygous mice. Conversely, prednisolone and vamorolone significantly decreased white blood cell counts and hepatic inflammation. Interestingly, the effects of vamorolone were milder than those of prednisolone, as vamorolone yielded less attenuation of hepatic inflammation compared to prednisolone. Compared to controls and heterozygotes, homozygotes had significant liver necrosis, which was significantly exacerbated by prednisolone and vamorolone despite decreased hepatic inflammation. These hepatic histopathologic changes were associated with increases in transaminases and alkaline phosphatase. Together, these results suggest that, even in the setting of decreasing hepatic inflammation, prednisolone and vamorolone were associated with significant hepatic toxicity in SCD mice. These findings raise the possibility that hepatic function deterioration could occur with the use of corticosteroids (conventional and dissociative) in SCD.

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: dose-response effects on growth

BACKGROUND

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the first-line treatment for children with persistent asthma. Their potential for growth suppression remains a matter of concern for parents and physicians.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether increasing the dose of ICS is associated with slower linear growth, weight gain and skeletal maturation in children with asthma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR) and the ClinicalTrials.gov website up to March 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were eligible if they were parallel-group randomised trials evaluating the impact of different doses of the same ICS using the same device in both groups for a minimum of three months in children one to 17 years of age with persistent asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors ascertained methodological quality independently using the Cochrane Risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was linear growth velocity. Secondary outcomes included change over time in growth velocity, height, weight, body mass index and skeletal maturation.

MAIN RESULTS

Among 22 eligible trials, 17 group comparisons were derived from 10 trials (3394 children with mild to moderate asthma), measured growth and contributed data to the meta-analysis. Trials used ICS (beclomethasone, budesonide, ciclesonide, fluticasone or mometasone) as monotherapy or as combination therapy with a long-acting beta2-agonist and generally compared low (50 to 100 μg) versus low to medium (200 μg) doses of hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-beclomethasone equivalent over 12 to 52 weeks. In the four comparisons reporting linear growth over 12 months, a significant group difference was observed, clearly indicating lower growth velocity in the higher ICS dose group of 5.74 cm/y compared with 5.94 cm/y on lower-dose ICS (N = 728 school-aged children; mean difference (MD)0.20 cm/y, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.39; high-quality evidence): No statistically significant heterogeneity was noted between trials contributing data. The ICS molecules (ciclesonide, fluticasone, mometasone) used in these four comparisons did not significantly influence the magnitude of effect (X(2) = 2.19 (2 df), P value 0.33). Subgroup analyses on age, baseline severity of airway obstruction, ICS dose and concomitant use of non-steroidal antiasthmatic drugs were not performed because of similarity across trials or inadequate reporting. A statistically significant group difference was noted in unadjusted change in height from zero to three months (nine comparisons; N = 944 children; MD 0.15, 95% CI -0.28 to -0.02; moderate-quality evidence) in favour of a higher ICS dose. No statistically significant group differences in change in height were observed at other time points, nor were such differences in weight, bone mass index and skeletal maturation reported with low quality of evidence due to imprecision.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In prepubescent school-aged children with mild to moderate persistent asthma, a small but statistically significant group difference in growth velocity was observed between low doses of ICS and low to medium doses of HFA-beclomethasone equivalent, favouring the use of low-dose ICS. No apparent difference in the magnitude of effect was associated with three molecules reporting one-year growth velocity, namely, mometasone, ciclesonide and fluticasone. In view of prevailing parents' and physicians' concerns about the growth suppressive effect of ICS, lack of or incomplete reporting of growth velocity in more than 86% (19/22) of eligible paediatric trials, including those using beclomethasone and budesonide, is a matter of concern. All future paediatric trials comparing different doses of ICS with or without placebo should systematically document growth. Findings support use of the minimal effective ICS dose in children with asthma.

Inhaled corticosteroids in children with persistent asthma: effects on growth

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines for asthma recommend inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) as first-line therapy for children with persistent asthma. Although ICS treatment is generally considered safe in children, the potential systemic adverse effects related to regular use of these drugs have been and continue to be a matter of concern, especially the effects on linear growth.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of ICS on the linear growth of children with persistent asthma and to explore potential effect modifiers such as characteristics of available treatments (molecule, dose, length of exposure, inhalation device) and of treated children (age, disease severity, compliance with treatment).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (CAGR), which is derived from systematic searches of bibliographic databases including CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED and PsycINFO; we handsearched respiratory journals and meeting abstracts. We also conducted a search of ClinicalTrials.gov and manufacturers' clinical trial databases to look for potential relevant unpublished studies. The literature search was conducted in January 2014.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Parallel-group randomised controlled trials comparing daily use of ICS, delivered by any type of inhalation device for at least three months, versus placebo or non-steroidal drugs in children up to 18 years of age with persistent asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, data extraction and assessment of risk of bias in included studies. We conducted meta-analyses using the Cochrane statistical package RevMan 5.2 and Stata version 11.0. We used the random-effects model for meta-analyses. We used mean differences (MDs) and 95% CIs as the metrics for treatment effects. A negative value for MD indicates that ICS have suppressive effects on linear growth compared with controls. We performed a priori planned subgroup analyses to explore potential effect modifiers, such as ICS molecule, daily dose, inhalation device and age of the treated child.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 25 trials involving 8471 (5128 ICS-treated and 3343 control) children with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Six molecules (beclomethasone dipropionate, budesonide, ciclesonide, flunisolide, fluticasone propionate and mometasone furoate) [corrected] given at low or medium daily doses were used during a period of three months to four to six years. Most trials were blinded and over half of the trials had drop out rates of over 20%.Compared with placebo or non-steroidal drugs, ICS produced a statistically significant reduction in linear growth velocity (14 trials with 5717 participants, MD -0.48 cm/y, 95% CI -0.65 to -0.30, moderate quality evidence) and in the change from baseline in height (15 trials with 3275 participants; MD -0.61 cm/y, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.38, moderate quality evidence) during a one-year treatment period.Subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant group difference between six molecules in the mean reduction of linear growth velocity during one-year treatment (Chi² = 26.1, degrees of freedom (df) = 5, P value < 0.0001). The group difference persisted even when analysis was restricted to the trials using doses equivalent to 200 μg/d hydrofluoroalkane (HFA)-beclomethasone. Subgroup analyses did not show a statistically significant impact of daily dose (low vs medium), inhalation device or participant age on the magnitude of ICS-induced suppression of linear growth velocity during a one-year treatment period. However, head-to-head comparisons are needed to assess the effects of different drug molecules, dose, inhalation device or patient age. No statistically significant difference in linear growth velocity was found between participants treated with ICS and controls during the second year of treatment (five trials with 3174 participants; MD -0.19 cm/y, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.11, P value 0.22). Of two trials that reported linear growth velocity in the third year of treatment, one trial involving 667 participants showed similar growth velocity between the budesonide and placebo groups (5.34 cm/y vs 5.34 cm/y), and another trial involving 1974 participants showed lower growth velocity in the budesonide group compared with the placebo group (MD -0.33 cm/y, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.14, P value 0.0005). Among four trials reporting data on linear growth after treatment cessation, three did not describe statistically significant catch-up growth in the ICS group two to four months after treatment cessation. One trial showed accelerated linear growth velocity in the fluticasone group at 12 months after treatment cessation, but there remained a statistically significant difference of 0.7 cm in height between the fluticasone and placebo groups at the end of the three-year trial.One trial with follow-up into adulthood showed that participants of prepubertal age treated with budesonide 400 μg/d for a mean duration of 4.3 years had a mean reduction of 1.20 cm (95% CI -1.90 to -0.50) in adult height compared with those treated with placebo.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of ICS at low or medium daily doses is associated with a mean reduction of 0.48 cm/y in linear growth velocity and a 0.61-cm change from baseline in height during a one-year treatment period in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma. The effect size of ICS on linear growth velocity appears to be associated more strongly with the ICS molecule than with the device or dose (low to medium dose range). ICS-induced growth suppression seems to be maximal during the first year of therapy and less pronounced in subsequent years of treatment. However, additional studies are needed to better characterise the molecule dependency of growth suppression, particularly with newer molecules (mometasone, ciclesonide), to specify the respective role of molecule, daily dose, inhalation device and patient age on the effect size of ICS, and to define the growth suppression effect of ICS treatment over a period of several years in children with persistent asthma.

Comparative safety and efficacy of two formulations of mometasone nasal spray in adult seasonal allergic rhinitis

Mometasone furoate as a nasal spray is an effective treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). An aqueous mometasone nasal spray containing the same active substance and excipients as the originator product (reference mometasone) has been developed. This study was designed to establish therapeutic equivalence of test mometasone to reference mometasone and superiority over placebo for the treatment of SAR in adults. In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, fixed-dose study, patients aged ≥18 years with SAR were randomized 2:2:1 to reference mometasone, test mometasone, or placebo for 28 days. Patients recorded nasal and ocular symptoms daily. The primary end point was change from baseline in the pooled 24-hour reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS). Safety and tolerability included evaluation by adverse events (AEs), physical (including nasal) examinations, vital signs assessments, laboratory evaluations, and change in concomitant medications. Four hundred two patients received reference mometasone (n = 156), test mometasone (n = 163), or placebo (n = 83). The intent-to-treat population (ITT) comprised 399 patients, and the per-protocol (PP) population comprised 327 patients. The 95% confidence intervals for the treatment difference (reference minus test mometasone) in change from baseline in pooled 24-hour rTNSS were within prespecified equivalence limits for the PP and ITT populations. Both active treatments showed superiority over placebo (p = 0.0019-0.0087). No significant difference was seen between test mometasone and reference mometasone for any secondary efficacy variables. Treatment-emergent AE incidence was low. No deaths or serious AEs were reported. The test mometasone is efficacious in the treatment of SAR in adults and shows a favorable safety profile. The results indicate that the test mometasone is therapeutically equivalent to the reference mometasone.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate to other inhaled steroids for asthma: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

It has been of great interest whether mometasone furoate (MF) is better than other inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) as the controller therapy in patients with moderate or severe asthma who had previously been taking ICSs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this meta-analysis is to thoroughly compare the efficacy and safety of MF versus other ICSs with equipotent daily doses in those patients.

METHODS

Relative databases were searched. Randomised controlled trials of more than or equal to 4 weeks' treatment duration comparing MF with other ICSs were reviewed.

RESULTS

Six trials with 1354 randomised patients met the inclusion criteria. Significant differences favouring MF were found in all indices of pulmonary function. MF was superior compared to other ICSs in decreasing the frequency of rescue medication use and morning difficulty breathing score. There was no significant difference between MF and other ICSs therapy in morning wheezing score, cough score and percentage of patients with no nocturnal awakenings due to asthma. For the treatment-related adverse effects (AEs), treatment-related severe AEs, discontinuations due to AEs and some common symptom of AEs, MF was all similar to other ICSs in their incidence.

CONCLUSIONS

In adult patients with moderate or severe asthma who had previously been taking ICSs, MF was superior to other ICSs with equipotent daily doses as controller monotherapy in improving pulmonary function and decreasing the frequency of rescue medication use, and was similar to other ICSs in the incidence of AEs. These results demonstrated the priority of MF in asthma therapy.

Early interventional treatment with intranasal mometasone furoate in Japanese cedar/cypress pollinosis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the safety and effectiveness of early interventional treatment (EIT) with intranasal corticosteroids for seasonal allergic rhinitis. We designed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled 12-week trial of EIT with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) for Japanese cedar/cypress pollinosis (JCCP).

METHODS

A total of 50 JCCP patients received MFNS (200μg once daily: n = 25) or placebo (n = 25) starting on February 1, 2010. Treatments continued until the end of April. The primary endpoint was the comparison of the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) between the MFNS and placebo groups. The secondary endpoints included comparisons of QOL, daytime sleepiness, nasal ECP levels, and safety.

RESULTS

Continuous dispersion of Japanese cedar pollen began on February 22. Although the placebo group showed a significant worsening of symptoms after the start of the continuous dispersion, no worsening occurred in the MFNS group. A significant difference in the TNSS between the two groups was seen starting at 4 weeks after the treatment. Similar results were seen for QOL and sleepiness. Nasal ECP levels in March were significantly lower in the MFNS group. A total of 56% of the MFNS group progressed to a persistent allergic rhinitis state in accordance with the ARIA classification, as opposed to 84% of the placebo group. MFNS was well tolerated, and the plasma cortisol concentrations were similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

EIT with MFNS for JCCP is both safe and effective. This treatment can potentially lessen symptoms and help pollinosis patients remain in the intermittent state.

Mometasone furoate nasal spray increases the number of minimal-symptom days in patients with acute rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Acute rhinosinusitis (ARS) is triggered by viral or, uncommonly, bacterial infection, causing inflammatory symptoms for ≤12 weeks.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate effects of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) vs amoxicillin and placebo on minimal-symptom days.

METHODS

A double-blind, parallel-group, placebo- and active-controlled 15-day study randomly assigned patients 12 years of age or older to MFNS 200 μg twice daily, MFNS 200 μg once daily, amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily, or placebo. Patients had baseline rhinosinusitis major symptom score (MSS; combined rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, congestion, sinus headache, facial pain) of ≥5 and ≤12 (maximum: 15) for 7 to 28 days; scores were similar among groups. Minimal-symptom days and minimal-congestion days were defined post hoc by average am/pm MSS ≤4 and average AM/PM congestion ≤1.

RESULTS

MFNS twice daily (n = 234) showed more minimal-symptom days vs placebo (n = 246) (62.69% vs 50.33%; P < .0001) or amoxicillin (n = 248) (54.35%; P = .0040). The MFNS QD was associated with numerically more minimal-symptom days than amoxicillin or placebo (54.72%; P ≤ .8982). MFNS was associated with more minimal-congestion days than placebo (72.97%, 67.73%, and 56.67% for twice daily, once daily, and placebo; P < .0001, each vs placebo) and MFNS BID with more minimal-congestion days than amoxicillin (72.97% vs 64.15%; P = .0007). Median time to first minimal-symptom day sustained until study end was 8.5 days for MFNS BID vs. 11 for placebo (P = .0085).

CONCLUSION

MFNS 200 μg twice daily significantly increased minimal-symptom days vs amoxicillin or placebo in patients with ARS. Results of this intranasal corticosteroids (INS) therapy indicate it can improve outcomes and potentially reduce inappropriate antibiotic use.

Safety update regarding intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of allergic rhinitis

Intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) are the most efficacious medication for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. In 2006, the Joint Task Force of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, and the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, published a white paper on the potential over-the-counter switch of INS (Bielory L, Blaiss M, Fineman SM, et al. Concerns about intranasal corticosteroids for over-the-counter use: Position statement of the Joint Task Force for the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology and the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 96:514-525, 2006). The concern of the paper was the safety of the use of these agents without oversight by a health care professional. The objective of this paper was to review published literature on the safety of INS since the publication of the task force white paper. Recent studies, which evaluated topical and systemic adverse events associated with ciclesonide (CIC), fluticasone furoate (FF), mometasone furoate (MF), triamcinolone acetonide, fluticasone propionate, budesonide, and beclomethasone dipropionate were summarized. In general, no significant topical or systemic complications were observed in these studies, although none were >1 year in duration. The newer formulations of topical corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis, such as CIC, FF, and MF, which have less systemic bioavailability, may be safer for long-term use. New studies continue to add to the reassurance of the safety of INSs in the treatment of allergic rhinitis but still do not answer the question if these agents are appropriate for long-term use without oversight by a health care professional.

Shortened treatment duration of glucocorticoid-induced skin atrophy in rats

Glucocorticoids (GCs) belong to the most widely used anti-inflammatory drugs at all. However, their topical use is limited by their side effect potential, with skin atrophy being the most prominent one. Thus, determining the atrophogenic potential of novel compounds is of importance for drug development. Currently, the most frequently performed model in the base and pharmaceutical research is the hr/hr rat model of GC-induced skin atrophy that lasts for 19 days. In this study, we analysed statistically skin atrophy experiments retrospectively to ascertain (i) the earliest time-point, at which skin atrophy is significantly induced; and (ii) whether the differences between the GC treatment groups change until the end of the experiment. We show here that the treatment duration of rat skin atrophy models might be reduced to 5 days for economical and ethical reasons.

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in patients with chronic sinusitis.

METHODS

In this double-blind, placebocontrolled, multicenter, parallel-group study, 60 patients with persistent sinusitis symptoms were randomized to receive either MFNS 200 μg twice daily or placebo, for 16 weeks (112 days). Eventually, 53 patients terminated the study in regular course.

RESULTS

Total Symptom Scores (TSS) in patients receiving MFNS changed by a mean of -7.27 (95% CI -9.71, -4.84), versus -5.35 (95% CI -6.73, -3.96) in the placebo group (P=0.51). MFNS reduced nasal congestion and discharge scores, and improved patients' olfactory function. There were few side effects. Considerably more patients in the MFNS group were satisfied with the treatment than those who had received placebo (P<0.05). Also, more patients would take the medication again in the event of symptoms, compared with those who had taken placebo (P<0.05). Furthermore, the MFNS patients would recommend it to others.

CONCLUSION

The positive patient assessment and few side effects are reflected in the efficacy evaluation performed by the physicians. The endoscopic results under MFNS were always numerically more favorable than those under placebo, and the overall difference reached statistical significance (P<0.01). MFNS offers an effective and safe treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Efficacy and long-term safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in children with perennial allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) affects up to 40% of children by age 6 years. Perennial AR (PAR) causes sleep disturbance, diminishes concentration in school, impairs psychosocial functioning, and reduces quality of life. This study evaluated efficacy and long-term safety of the intranasal corticosteroid mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in children with PAR.

METHODS

This study comprised a double-blind, 4-week efficacy and safety period followed by a 6-month, open-label safety period. Primary efficacy variable during the double-blind period was mean change in physician-evaluated total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from baseline to day 15. Other efficacy variables during this phase included subject-evaluated TNSS, individual nasal symptoms, and total symptom score (TSS, nasal and non-nasal symptoms, summed). Physician-evaluated improvement in overall condition of PAR was assessed during the open-label period. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout.

RESULTS

Subjects aged 3-11 years with PAR (n = 381) were randomized to MFNS 100 microg (n = 190) or placebo (n = 191) daily for 4 weeks; 357 subjects continued into the open-label period, receiving MFNS only. Between baseline and day 15, significantly greater mean changes were seen with MFNS-treated patients than placebo in physician-evaluated TNSS (-2.8, -39%, vs. -2.2, -32%; p = 0.02). Statistically significant improvements in MFNS versus placebo were reported for subject-evaluated TNSS, TSS, and individual nasal symptom scores (p < or = 0.03 for all). Improvement continued through the open-label period. Subjects treated with MFNS in both periods experienced a 45% further reduction in TSS in this study phase, while those who switched from placebo to MFNS saw a further 49% decrease. MFNS was well-tolerated in both periods. The most frequently reported treatment-related AEs during the double-blind period for MFNS and placebo, respectively, were epistaxis, seven (4%) and nine (5%); sneezing, five (3%) and seven (4%); headache, six (3%) and five (3%). During the open-label period, the AEs reported most often were epistaxis 37 (10%), headache nine (3%), and rhinitis 12 (3%).

LIMITATIONS

Studies in children present unique challenges because subjects are too young to grasp subjective concepts such as symptom severity, especially as rated on a numbered scale. In addition, the 6-month extension of the placebo-controlled phase used a single agent. It is also possible that subjects' symptoms could have abated independent of mometasone furoate treatment.

CONCLUSION

MFNS 100 microg/day effectively reduces TNSS, TSS (including ocular symptoms), and individual symptoms associated with PAR and is well-tolerated for up to 6 months in children aged 3-11 years with a safety profile similar to placebo.

Twenty-six-week efficacy and safety study of mometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 microg combination treatment in patients with persistent asthma previously receiving medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids

Asthma is a heterogeneous condition characterized by reduced lung function, chronic inflammation, and periodic asthma deteriorations. This study was performed to evaluate the effect of mometasone furoate (MF)/formoterol (F) combination, 200/10 microg, administered twice daily (b.i.d.) on asthma deteriorations and pulmonary function in patients with asthma uncontrolled on medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS). After 2- to 3-week open-label run-in with MF 200 microg b.i.d., patients (>or=12 years) were randomized to 26 weeks of treatment with MF/F 200/10 microg, MF 200 microg, F 10 microg, or placebo b.i.d. Coprimary end points were time to first asthma deterioration (MF/F versus F) and bronchodilation, assessed by the area under the curve of the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second 0-12 hours (FEV(1) AUC(0-12h); MF/F versus MF). A total of 781 patients were randomized. Treatment with MF/F 200/10 microg reduced asthma deteriorations and clinically judged deteriorations (i.e., deterioration resulting in emergency treatment, hospitalization, or treatment with additional excluded asthma medication [i.e., systemic corticosteroids]). The proportion of patients experiencing asthma deteriorations was MF/F, 30.4%; MF, 33.9%; F, 54.0%; placebo, 55.6% (p < 0.001, MF/F versus F and placebo). There was a sixfold reduction in clinically judged deteriorations with MF/F versus F and placebo (p < 0.001). Lung function improved more rapidly with MF/F than MF and placebo. Mean change from baseline FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) at week 12 was MF/F, 11.7% versus MF, 5.7%; F, 8.5%; and placebo, 3.9% (p < 0.001). Treatment-related AEs were rare and similar across groups. Treatment with MF/F 200/10 microg was effective in reducing the risk of asthma deteriorations. MF/F was safe and provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation in patients with asthma.

Twelve-week efficacy and safety study of mometasone furoate/formoterol 200/10 microg and 400/10 microg combination treatments in patients with persistent asthma previously receiving high-dose inhaled corticosteroids

A significant unmet medical need exists in patients with uncontrolled asthma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate/formoterol (MF/F) 400/10 microg versus MF 400 microg administered twice-daily (b.i.d.) via metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma uncontrolled on high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). In a 12-week, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (>or=12 years of age) were randomized to MF/F 200/10 microg, MF/F 400/10 microg, or MF 400 microg, b.i.d. after a 2- to 3-week open-label run in with MF 400 microg b.i.d. The primary end point was mean change in area under the curve from 0 to 12 hours in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1) AUC(0-12h)) from baseline to week 12 for MF/F 400/10 microg versus MF 400 microg. Effects of MF/F on asthma control and symptoms were evaluated and adverse events recorded. Seven hundred twenty-eight patients were randomized. Significant improvement from baseline to week 12 occurred for mean change in FEV(1) AUC(0-12h) with MF/F 400/10 microg (4.19 L x hour) versus MF 400 microg (2.04 L x hour; p < 0.001). Both MF/F doses resulted in rapid (5 minutes) and sustained improvement in lung function throughout 12 weeks. Both MF/F doses were superior to MF in improving asthma control and reducing nocturnal awakenings due to asthma requiring short-acting beta(2)-agonist use. All treatments were well tolerated. Asthma patients who were poorly controlled on high-dose ICS experienced significant improvement in asthma control, lung function, and symptoms when treated with MF/F compared with MF.

[Effectiveness criteria for the topical application of glucocorticosteroids to the treatment of exudative otitis media associated with allergic rhinitis]

We undertook comparative analysis of ciliotoxic effect of glucocorticosteroids frequently used for catheterization of the eustachian tube in patients presenting with exudative otitis media and concomitant allergic rhinitis. It was shown that the recovery of transport function of ciliary epithelium and appreciable clinical effect of the treatment were achieved by the application of mometasone furoate. Dexamethasone was next to mometasone in terms of efficiency whereas hydrocortisone produced much lower beneficial effect. It is concluded that, taking into account high bioavailability of dexametasone and hydrocortisone (> 80%) and contraindications to their intranasal administration, the preference should be given to medications with lower bioavailability.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mometasone furoate in adult Japanese patients with mild asthma: open-label clinical trial findings

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate administered via a dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) in Japanese patients with intermittent or mild persistent asthma who were not previously receiving inhaled corticosteroids.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was an 8-week open-label study conducted in Japanese patients > or =16 years of age with intermittent or mild persistent asthma. All patients provided informed written consent before baseline and were treated with MF-DPI 200 microg/day, taken as 100 microg twice daily (BID). Inhaled steroids other than the study drug are not used, the drugs used previously are continued, dose of concomitant drug may be reduced if symptoms are improved and no new drugs were allowed during the trial. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in morning peak expiratory flow (AM PEF). Secondary efficacy variables were evening (PM) PEF, spirometric measurements of lung function, and subjective symptoms. Descriptive statistics and standard errors were calculated for each efficacy evaluation. The safety of MF-DPI treatment was evaluated by measuring adverse events (AEs) and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

Twenty patients received MF-DPI, and 19 patients (nine with intermittent asthma and 10 with mild persistent asthma) were included in the full analysis set (FAS). The mean AM PEF and PM PEF values increased by 9.1% (P < 0.0001) and 7.3% (P < 0.0001), respectively, in the FAS. Improvements in AM and PM PEF occurred as early as week 1 and were sustained throughout treatment. Improvements at week 8 in forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity were 11.0% and 8.2%, respectively. Notable decreases occurred for subjective symptom scores. The reported AEs were mild to moderate in severity. Study limitations include the small sample size and open-label treatment. This study was planned as the first study of MF-DPI in Japanese mild asthma patients without receiving other inhaled steroids. In addition, the cost:benefit ratio of MF-DPI in patients with intermittent asthma was not addressed.

CONCLUSION

MF-DPI 100 microg BID is an effective treatment for Japanese patients with intermittent or mild persistent asthma.

Mometasone furoate improves nasal and ocular symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis in adolescents

Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) is common in adolescents. However, few studies have investigated the effectiveness of intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) for nasal and ocular symptoms of SAR solely in adolescents. The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the INS mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in adolescents; a post hoc analysis was conducted of adolescents who had participated in a study with adults. Data were analyzed retrospectively for subjects aged 12-17 years with moderate or severe SAR randomized to mometasone furoate, 200 mcg once daily (n = 86), or placebo (n = 82) for 15 days in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Symptom scores (0 = none to 3 = severe) were recorded in diaries twice daily. End points included changes from baseline in total nasal symptom score (TNSS), individual nasal symptom score (rhinorrhea, congestion, itching, and sneezing), and total ocular symptom score (TOSS). Over 15 days, a significantly greater decrease from baseline in mean TNSS was observed in subjects receiving mometasone furoate (-2.47; -28.8%) compared with those receiving placebo (-0.9; -9.6%; p < 0.001). Significant improvement versus placebo was seen for each full day of treatment. Mometasone furoate significantly improved individual nasal symptoms (p < or = 0.03) and TOSS (p = 0.011) versus placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar for both treatment groups. MFNS, 200 mcg once daily, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for symptoms of SAR in adolescents.

Mometasone furoate: an effective anti-inflammatory with a well-defined safety and tolerability profile in the treatment of asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are recommended as a controller medication in the most recent Global Initiative for Asthma and the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute guidelines. Mometasone furoate (MF) is an effective, well-tolerated inhaled steroid and is indicated for the maintenance treatment of adult and adolescent patients (> or = 12 years) with persistent asthma. MF is approved for once or bid maintenance treatment of asthma (in patients previously receiving ICS or bronchodilators). Low systemic bioavailability and high relative binding affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor are properties of MF that allow for a favourable efficacy and tolerability profile. Inhaled MF has been shown to be an effective and well-tolerated controller medication for those patients with mild, moderate or severe persistent asthma. MF has recently been approved by the US regulatory authorities for use in children (4-11 years). Future developments include the combination of MF with the long-acting bronchodilators, formoterol and indacaterol, to provide additional options in the treatment of asthma.

Efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials

RATIONALE

Several randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) thus allowing for a meta-analysis to determine the overall treatment effect.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, LILACS, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Library databases up to 31 October, 2007 was carried out. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of MFNS in patients with AR compared to placebo were included. Total nasal symptom scores (TNSS), individual nasal symptoms, total non-nasal symptom scores (TNNSS) and nasal airflow were analysed as the standardized mean difference (SMD). Meta-analysis was performed with the random or the fixed effect models depending on heterogeneity, by using revman 5 software.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Sixteen of the 113 identified articles met the inclusion criteria. For MFNS efficacy on TNSS, 2998 participants were analysed: 1534 received MFNS and 1464 placebo. Mometasone furoate nasal spray was associated with a significant reduction in TNSS (SMD -0.49, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.38; P < 0.00001; I(2) = 50.1%). A significant effect on SMD for nasal stuffiness/congestion (-0.41; 95% CI: -0.56 to -0.27), rhinorrhoea (-0.44; 95% CI: -0.66 to -0.21), sneezing (-0.40; 95% CI: -0.57 to -0.23) and nasal itching (-0.39; 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.25) was also demonstrated. Mometasone furoate nasal spray treated subjects also showed a significant reduction in TNNSS (-0.30; 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.18). The proportion of patients with adverse events was similar for MFNS and placebo (0.99; 95% CI: 0.81-1.20; P = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis provides a level Ia evidence for the efficacy of MFSN in the treatment of AR vs placebo. Adverse events frequency was similar in both groups.

Efficacy of nasal corticosteroids alone or combined with antihistamines or montelukast in treatment of allergic rhinitis

OBJECTIVE

Topical corticosteroids are recommended as initial therapy in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. We investigated clinical efficacy of monotherapy with topical steroid and combined therapy in AR patients.

METHODS

Ninety-five AR patients sensitive to grass pollens according to skin prick test results were enrolled in this placebo-controlled and open study. Patients were divided to four groups. Group-1 received only intranasal mometasone furoate (MF) 200microg (n=25), group-2 received intranasal MF and oral desloratadine (DLR) 5mg (n=25), group-3 received intranasal MF and oral montelukast (MSK) 10mg (n=25), group-4 received only placebo (n=20). Efficacy was assessed on the basis of total nasal symptom scores, rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire scores and nasal inspiratory peak flow rates.

RESULTS

All groups that received treatment had better results when compared to the placebo group. Significant improvement in total nasal symptom scores was first evident at the end of the 2nd week in group-2. Group-3 had better results than those of the other groups at the end of the 1st month (p<0.05). Quality of life scores were significantly better in group-2 and -3 when compared to those in group-1 (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although corticosteroids are the mainstay of treatment in allergic rhinitis, montelukast may be considered as an additional agent especially in treatment of patients with impaired quality of life and it may be used to reduce nasal symptom scores.

Comparative adrenocortical suppression in dogs with otitis externa following topical otic administration of four different glucocorticoid-containing medications

The safety of using otic formulations is often of concern for practitioners and pet owners alike, with "safe" in this context meaning no adrenocortical suppression. This study evaluated the effect of four glucocorticoid-containing otic formulations on plasma cortisol concentrations, measured by corticotropin stimulation testing (plasma cortisol concentrations before and after corticotropin injection), in dogs presented with otitis externa. Dexamethasone tended to have larger adrenocortical suppression compared with the other three formulations (betamethasone, triamcinolone, and mometasone), but the difference was not statistically significant. The largest difference among the four drugs was observed between dexamethasone and betamethasone (P=.09).

Superior nuclear receptor selectivity and therapeutic index of methylprednisolone aceponate versus mometasone furoate

Although introduced more than 50 years ago, topical glucocorticoids are still the first line therapy for many inflammatory skin disorders such as atopic eczema, contact dermatitis and many others. Recently, significant improvements have been made to optimize the ratio of desired to unwanted effects. While with early compounds such as triamcinolone, topical side effects such as skin atrophy and telangiectasias can be observed rather frequently, newer drugs such as methylprednisolone aceponate or mometasone furoate have a significantly improved therapeutic index. The present study compared these two modern topical glucocorticoids, which possess the highest therapeutic index currently found, in terms of nuclear receptor selectivity in vitro and induction of the most important local side effects (skin atrophy and telangiectasias) in a relevant rodent model in vivo. We demonstrate that methylprednisolone aceponate displays higher specificity in nuclear receptor binding compared with mometasone furoate. Methylprednisolone aceponate was also markedly superior in terms of minimizing induction of skin atrophy or telangiectasias when compared with mometasone furoate. Based on these observations, methylprednisolone aceponate is expected to have a greater therapeutic index as compared with mometasone furoate, at least in the test systems used here. The degree to which this observation may translate into a clinical setting requires confirmation.

[Position of the Retinological Society, the German Ophthalmological Society and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists in Germany on the current therapeutic possibilities for neovascular age-related macular degeneration]

The basic conditions in the management of exudative age-related macular degeneration have changed considerably since the last statement of the German professional associations in 2006. While Pegaptanib was approved in Germany already in 2006 Ranibizumab was approved for the treatment of exudative macular degeneration in Germany in February 2007. More over the quality assurance regulations for the photodynamic treatment of choroidal neovascularizations with Verteporfin were modified including the treatment of occult lesions and implementing a simplified classification of extra- and subfoveal lesions. Consequently modification of the recommendations for the non-surgical treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration appeared inevitable.

Short-term growth in children with eczema during treatment with topical mometasone furoate and tacrolimus

BACKGROUND

Treatment with topical glucocorticoids in children with atopic eczema may be associated with systemic adverse effects, such as suppression of growth.

AIM

To asses if treatment with topical mometasone furoate 0.1% or topical tacrolimus 0.1% affects short-term growth in children with atopic eczema. Primary outcome measures were lower leg growth rates measured by knemometry.

METHODS

Twenty 5- to 12-year-old prepubertal children with atopic eczema were included in a randomised, investigator-blind crossover study with five periods: two treatment periods, a run in, a wash out and a run out. All periods were of 2-week duration. The subjects applied mometasone furoate ointment 0.1% once daily during one treatment period and tacrolimus ointment 0.1% twice daily during the other treatment period.

RESULTS

As compared to run in mean lower leg growth rate during mometasone furoate and tacrolimus treatment was reduced by 0.09 and 0.06 mm/week, respectively, (F = 1.12, p = 0.35). Consistently, no statistically significant effects on urine levels of eosinophil protein X and crossed-linked N-telopeptides were detected.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with mometasone furoate or tacrolimus does not affect short-term growth in children with mild to moderate atopic eczema.

The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate delivered via a dry powder inhaler for the treatment of asthma

Inhaled corticosteroids are the gold standard of daily therapy for effective control of all stages of persistent asthma. For this review of the new inhaled corticosteroid mometasone furoate, a MEDLINE/PubMed search using the terms "mometasone furoate AND asthma" found 57 articles, 17 of which presented data from efficacy and safety studies reviewed herein. In clinical trials, once-daily evening dosing of mometasone furoate delivered via dry powder inhaler (200 or 400 mu g/day) was effective in patients with mild to moderate asthma previously treated with short-acting beta2-agonists alone and in those previously maintained on inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In patients with severe asthma, mometasone furoate 400 mu g twice daily eliminated or reduced the need for oral prednisone while improving lung function, asthma symptoms, and quality of life. Clinical studies have shown that mometasone furoate is generally well tolerated and has minimal systemic activity at recommended doses. In conclusion, mometasone furoate provides primary care and specialty physicians with a safe, effective, and convenient option to meet the challenges of asthma management.

Cross-reactions to desoximetasone and mometasone furoate in a patient with multiple topical corticosteroid allergies

A 60-year-old man developed a bullous contact dermatitis after topical corticosteroid treatment of dermatitis on his lower leg. Subsequent patch testing showed cross-reactions to numerous group B and group D corticosteroids as well as cross-reactions to group C desoximetasone and group D1 mometasone furoate. His patch-test result was negative for the group A corticosteroids hydrocortisone and tixocortol pivalate. We discuss the uncommon finding of cross-reactions to desoximetasone and mometasone furoate.

Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been shown to effectively treat asthma in children.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children previously using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs).

METHODS

A 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI (100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily) in 296 children 4 to 11 years old with asthma previously using ICSs. The primary efficacy variable was the change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to end point. Secondary efficacy variables included absolute FEV1, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, response to therapy, and health-related quality of life.

RESULTS

Mean changes from baseline at end point in predicted FEV1 were 4.73 and 5.52 percentage points for mometasone furoate DPI, 100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily, respectively, the difference of which was not significant, and -1.77 percentage points for placebo (P < or = .002). Significant improvements in secondary efficacy variables were also observed for both mometasone furoate DPI treatments over placebo. Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated, and no significant differences were noted among the 3 treatment groups in adverse event reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function, maintained effective asthma control, and improved quality of life in children with asthma.

Clinical Safety Profile of Posterior Juxtascleral Depot Administration of Anecortave Acetate 15 mg Suspension as Primary Therapy or Adjunctive Therapy with Photodynamic Therapy for Treatment of Wet Age-Related Macular Degeneration

OBJECTIVES

Safety data for anecortave acetate 15 mg suspension (Retaane 15 mg, Alcon Research, Ltd., Ft. Worth, TX 76134) as primary or adjunctive therapy with photodynamic therapy are available for 358 patients with age-related macular degeneration who received this novel cortisene during clinical trials in which the drug was administered via posterior juxtascleral depot every 6 months for 2 years.

METHODS

Detailed ophthalmic examinations, physical examinations, and adverse event reporting were used to characterize the clinical safety of anecortave acetate 15 mg and were monitored by an Independent Safety Committee.

RESULTS

Anecortave acetate 15 mg was safe and well tolerated in the overall patient population. No serious, treatment-related deaths were reported. Ocular adverse events assessed as related to anecortave acetate 15 mg were non-serious with one exception (retinal detachment), mild to moderate in intensity with one exception, generally resolved with or without treatment, and did not interrupt patient participation in the studies with two exceptions.

CONCLUSIONS

Anecortave acetate 15 mg is safe and well-tolerated when administered as a posterior juxtascleral depot at 6-month intervals for use as primary therapy or as adjunctive therapy with PDT.

Mometasone Furoate Nasal Spray

The development of corticosteroids that are delivered directly to the nasal mucosa has alleviated much of the concern about the systemic adverse effects associated with oral corticosteroid therapy. However, given the high potency of these drugs and their widespread use in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, it is important to ensure that intranasal corticosteroids have a favourable benefit-risk ratio. One agent that typifies the systemic safety found in the majority of intranasal corticosteroids is mometasone furoate nasal spray, a potent and effective treatment for seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and nasal polyposis. Mometasone furoate does not reach high systemic concentrations or cause clinically significant adverse effects. Results from pharmacokinetic studies in adults and children suggest that systemic exposure to mometasone furoate after intranasal administration is negligible. This is probably because of the inherently low aqueous solubility of mometasone furoate, which allows only a small fraction of the drug to cross the nasal mucosa and enter the bloodstream, and because a large amount of the administered drug is swallowed and undergoes extensive first-pass metabolism. There is no clinical evidence that mometasone furoate nasal spray suppresses the function of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis when the drug is administered at clinically relevant doses (100-200 microg/day); consequently, mometasone furoate nasal spray has not been associated with growth inhibition in children. The safety and tolerability of mometasone furoate nasal spray have been rigorously assessed in clinical trials involving approximately 4,500 patients, with epistaxis, headache and pharyngitis being the most common adverse effects associated with treatment in adolescents and adults. The clinical effectiveness of mometasone furoate nasal spray, coupled with its agreeable safety and tolerability profile, confirms its favourable benefit-risk ratio.

Effects of intranasal corticosteroid on nasal adenosine monophosphate challenge in persistent allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Response to a single dose nasal adenosine monophosphate challenge has been used as a surrogate inflammatory marker for allergic rhinitis. Attenuation of response following intranasal corticosteroid would further validate the challenge.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of 4 weeks of 200 mcg once daily mometasone furoate nasal spray on a simplified (single 160 mg dose) nasal adenosine monophosphate challenge.

METHODS

Twenty participants with persistent allergic rhinitis completed a double blind placebo-controlled crossover study. Outcome measures were the peak nasal inspiratory flow and total nasal symptoms score responses to nasal adenosine monophosphate challenge, as well as domiciliary peak nasal inspiratory flow and patient symptom diary cards.

RESULTS

Mometasone significantly (P < 0.05) attenuated response time profiles vs. placebo for peak nasal inspiratory flow but not total nasal symptom scores. For the maximum percentage fall this amounted to a mean difference of 9.6% (95% confidence interval 1.3-17.9%). The coefficient of variation for repeatability was 48.7%. Improvements were seen in prechallenge and domiciliary measurements of peak nasal inspiratory flow (both P < 0.05) and total nasal symptom scores (both P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Mometasone attenuates the peak nasal inspiratory flow response to a single 160 mg nasal adenosine monophosphate challenge. Such challenges have been shown to be sensitive to the effects of antihistamines, antileukotrienes and now nasal steroids. This further supports their application as surrogate inflammatory markers for therapeutic trials in allergic rhinitis, potentially as 20 min challenges which can be conducted in a non-hospital setting.

Inhaled mometasone furoate: A review of its use in persistent asthma in adults and adolescents

Inhaled mometasone furoate (Asmanex) is a synthetic corticosteroid indicated for the first-line maintenance prophylactic therapy of persistent asthma in adults and adolescents. It is formulated for delivery via a breath-actuated dry powder inhaler (DPI) [Twisthaler].Inhaled mometasone furoate delivered by DPI is effective in treating patients with persistent asthma. It improves pulmonary function and health-related quality of life, reduces symptoms and decreases oral corticosteroid requirements in severe disease. It is a potent anti-inflammatory agent and is at least as clinically effective as other inhaled corticosteroids. Inhaled mometasone furoate is equally effective in controlling asthma when administered in two divided doses or as a single daily dose. Once-daily administration of mometasone furoate 200 microg in the evening was more effective than administration of the same dosage in the morning. The drug is well tolerated, with low systemic bioavailability and minimal systemic activity. Therefore, it is an effective and convenient option for controller therapy of persistent asthma in adults and adolescents.

Inhaled mometasone furoate reduces oral prednisone usage and improves lung function in severe persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE

The reduction of oral prednisone use by mometasone furoate (MF) delivered by HFA-227 metered dose inhaler (MDI) was examined in oral corticosteroid (OCS)-dependent patients with severe persistent asthma.

METHODS

A 3-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (n=123), followed by a 9-month open-label phase (n=120). The study was conducted at 26 medical centers in the United States. Patients were randomized to treatment with MF-MDI 400 or 800 microg twice-daily (bid) doses, or placebo in the double-blind trial. All patients received MF in the open-label phase.

RESULTS

At the endpoint of the double-blind trial, MF-MDI 400 and 800 microg bid reduced the daily OCS dose by 39.4% and 31.1%, respectively, while placebo increased the OCS dose by 107.2% (P<0.01). The OCS requirement was reduced by 50% or more in 63% and 60% of patients treated with MF-MDI 400 and 800 microg bid, respectively, compared with 14% of patients receiving placebo. After 12 weeks, despite prednisone reductions, pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, and physician-evaluated response to therapy also showed significant improvement with MF-MDI treatment compared with placebo. Further reductions in OCS requirements were achieved with long-term MF-MDI treatment in the open-label phase, with an overall 67% reduction in prednisone usage and 51% of patients completely eliminating prednisone usage by the 1-year time point.

CONCLUSION

MF delivered by HFA-227 MDI significantly reduces daily OCS use compared with placebo and facilitates elimination of OCS use in patients with severe persistent asthma.

Once-daily evening administration of mometasone furoate in asthma treatment initiation

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, a 200-microg once-daily evening dose of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) was effective in patients with asthma previously taking inhaled corticosteroids. No studies have been conducted to test the effect of a once-daily evening dose in patients previously using only short-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (SABAs) for symptom relief.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of mometasone furoate DPI administered once daily in the evening as initial controller therapy in patients previously using SABAs alone for asthma.

METHODS

Patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma from 18 US centers participated in a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients received either mometasone furoate DPI, 200 microg, or placebo once daily in the evening. The primary efficacy variable was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline to the end point (last evaluable visit). Other measurements included forced vital capacity, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75%, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptoms, use of albuterol, nocturnal awakenings, physicians' evaluation of response to therapy, and time to asthma worsening.

RESULTS

At the end point, the mean increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second relative to baseline for the mometasone furoate DPI group of 0.43 L (16.8%) was significantly greater than that for the placebo group of 0.16 L (6.0%) (P < .01). Morning peak expiratory flow, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% also significantly improved with mometasone furoate DPI treatment relative to placebo (P < .01). Once-daily dosing with mometasone furoate DPI was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Mometasone furoate DPI (200 microg) administered once daily in the evening significantly improves pulmonary function in patients previously using SABAs alone for asthma control.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

CONCLUSION

In subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis, treatment with mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) 200 microg once daily (QD) significantly decreases nasal congestion, reduces polyp size, and improves quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of MFNS, administered QD in the morning, in subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled clinical trial enrolled subjects with mild-to-moderate nasal polyposis at 12 centers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Inclusion criteria were: age > or = 18 years, a diagnosis of bilateral nasal polyps, and clinically significant nasal congestion. Following a 2-4-week run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive MFNS 200 microg QD or matching placebo for 16 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 298 subjects were randomized to treatment. Of those subjects included in the intent-to-treat efficacy analysis (n = 291), a statistically greater proportion of the MFNS group than the placebo group had improvements in investigator-assessed nasal congestion score between baseline and end point (the primary outcome) (74.3% vs 46.8%; p < 0.001). Significant benefits of MFNS were also seen for secondary end points, including polyp size, sense of smell, peak nasal inspiratory flow, therapeutic improvement, and quality-of-life measures. MFNS was well tolerated, with no unusual or unexpected adverse events.

Anecortave acetate (15 milligrams) versus photodynamic therapy for treatment of subfoveal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

To compare 1-year safety and efficacy of anecortave acetate 15 mg with photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in patients eligible for initial PDT treatment.

DESIGN

Prospective, masked, randomized, multicenter, parallel group, active control, noninferiority clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Five hundred thirty patients with predominantly classic subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration were randomized to treatment with either anecortave acetate 15 mg or PDT.

METHODS

In the anecortave acetate group, the drug was administered under the Tenon's capsule as a periocular posterior juxtascleral depot (PJD) at the beginning of the study and at month 6. Before the first administration of anecortave acetate, patients in this treatment group received a sham PDT treatment, and sham PDT treatments were repeated every 3 months if there was evidence of leakage on fluorescein angiography (FA). Patients assigned to PDT received up to 4 PDT treatments at 3-month intervals, as needed based upon FA, and a sham PJD procedure at the beginning of the study and at month 6. Best-corrected visual acuity was determined at baseline and all follow-up visits. Safety data were regularly reviewed by an independent safety committee.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Percent responders (patients losing <3 lines of vision) at month 12.

RESULTS

Percent responders in the anecortave acetate and PDT groups were 45% and 49%, respectively (not statistically different, P = 0.43). The confidence interval (CI) for the difference ranged from -13.2% favoring PDT to +5.6% favoring anecortave acetate. The month 12 clinical outcome for anecortave acetate was improved in patients for whom reflux was controlled and who were treated within the 6-month treatment window (57% vs. 49%; 95% CI, -4.3% favoring PDT to +21.7% favoring anecortave acetate). No serious adverse events related to the study drug were reported in either treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety and efficacy outcomes in this study demonstrate that the benefits of anecortave acetate for the treatment of choroidal neovascularization outweigh the risks associated with either the drug or the PJD administration procedure.

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray in nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Studies have suggested that topical corticosteroids are effective in the treatment of nasal polyps; however, this has yet to be confirmed in a large, robust clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) for nasal polyposis.

METHODS

A total of 354 subjects with bilateral nasal polyps and clinically significant congestion/obstruction participated in this multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects received MFNS 200 microg once or twice daily or placebo for 4 months. Coprimary endpoints were (1) change from baseline to last assessment in physician-evaluated bilateral polyp grade score and (2) change from baseline averaged over month 1 in subject-assessed nasal congestion/obstruction. ANOVA was used for all efficacy endpoints, except for change in bilateral polyp grade score, for which baseline polyp grade was added as a covariate.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, MFNS 200 microg administered once or twice daily produced significantly greater reductions in bilateral polyp grade score (P < .001, P = .010, respectively) and congestion/obstruction (P = .001, P < .001), as well as improvement in loss of smell (P < .001, P = .036), anterior rhinorrhea (P < .001 for both), and postnasal drip (P < .001, P = .001) over month 1. MFNS 200 microg twice daily was superior to MFNS 200 microg once daily in reducing congestion/obstruction (P = .039), and there were more improvers in the MFNS 200 microg twice daily group (P = .035). MFNS was well tolerated in both groups.

CONCLUSION

MFNS 200 mug, once or twice daily, was safe and significantly superior to placebo in reducing polyp grade (size and extent) and improving congestion/obstruction and return of sense of smell. MFNS is an effective medical treatment for nasal polyposis and may reduce or delay the need for surgery.

Effects of mometasone furoate given once daily in the evening on lung function and symptom control in persistent asthma

BACKGROUND

The chronobiology of asthma suggests that, for once-daily dosing, an evening dose may be the most effective treatment paradigm.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF-DPI) administered once daily in the evening or twice daily in patients with asthma previously maintained on twice-daily regimens of inhaled corticosteroids.

METHODS

In this 12-week, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial, 268 subjects > or =12 years of age with inhaled corticosteroid-dependent asthma and baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) between 50% and 85% of predicted were randomized to receive treatment with MF-DPI 400 mug once daily in the evening, MF-DPI 200 mug twice daily, or placebo. The primary efficacy variable was mean change in FEV(1) from baseline to endpoint. Other lung function measures, asthma symptoms, quality of life, and rescue medication use also were assessed.

RESULTS

At endpoint, mean FEV(1) was significantly improved with both MF-DPI doses compared with placebo (p < 0.001). The 2 active treatment groups were statistically indistinguishable from each other. Secondary efficacy variables, including nocturnal awakenings, asthma worsenings, quality of life, and rescue medication use, were also significantly improved for both MF-DPI treatments compared with placebo. Both dosages were well tolerated; no clinically meaningful changes in laboratory values or vital signs were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

MF-DPI 400 mug once daily in the evening was as effective as MF-DPI 200 mug twice daily in improving pulmonary function, asthma symptoms, and quality of life compared with placebo in subjects previously using twice-daily regimens of an inhaled corticosteroid.

Efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and tolerability of mometasone furoate, levocabastine, and disodium cromoglycate nasal sprays in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines recommend intranasal glucocorticosteroids as first-line therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and tolerability of the topical glucocorticosteroid mometasone furoate, the topical antihistamine levocabastine hydrochloride, and the cromone disodium cromoglycate in seasonal allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

This study was performed during the 2003 grass pollen season as an open, randomized, parallel-group, single-center study of 123 patients assigned to receive mometasone furoate (200 microg once daily), levocabastine hydrochloride (200 microg twice daily), or disodium cromoglycate (5.6 mg 4 times daily). Symptom scores and nasal inspiratory peak flow measurements were recorded in a patient diary. The global efficacy of the study medication was evaluated by patients after treatment. Eosinophil cationic protein concentrations were measured in nasal secretions before and after treatment. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated as medication cost per treatment success.

RESULTS

Mometasone furoate therapy was significantly superior to the use of levocabastine or disodium cromoglycate with respect to all nasal symptoms, the global evaluation of efficacy, and eosinophil cationic protein concentration. Furthermore, mometasone furoate therapy was significantly superior to disodium cromoglycate therapy with respect to nasal inspiratory peak flow. Medication cost per treatment success was lowest with mometasone furoate use and highest with levocabastine use.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to compare mometasone furoate nasal spray with nonsteroidal topical treatments for seasonal allergic rhinitis. Mometasone furoate nasal spray was confirmed as a first-choice topical treatment option for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Treating acute rhinosinusitis: comparing efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray, amoxicillin, and placebo

BACKGROUND

Intranasal corticosteroids used with antibiotics are known to improve rhinosinusitis symptoms compared with antibiotic therapy alone. However, the efficacy of intranasal corticosteroid monotherapy for acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis is not established.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS) versus amoxicillin and placebo in patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis.

METHODS

In this double-blind, double-dummy trial, subjects (> or =12 years; N = 981) were randomized to MFNS 200 microg once daily or twice daily for 15 days, amoxicillin 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days, or respective placebo. Follow-up was 14 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was mean am/pm major symptom score over the treatment phase. Secondary efficacy endpoints included total symptom score. Safety assessments included disease recurrence during follow-up and adverse event monitoring.

RESULTS

Mometasone furoate nasal spray 200 microg twice daily was significantly superior to placebo (P < .001) and amoxicillin (P = .002) at improving major symptom score. Starting on day 2, MFNS 200 microg twice daily improved total symptom score throughout treatment versus amoxicillin (P = .012) and placebo (P < .001). Global response to treatment was significantly greater with MFNS 200 microg twice daily versus amoxicillin (P = .013) and placebo (P = .001). Although significantly superior to placebo, MFNS 200 microg once daily was not superior to amoxicillin for the primary or secondary efficacy endpoints. All treatments were well tolerated with a similar incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSION

In patients with acute, uncomplicated rhinosinusitis, MFNS 200 microg twice daily produced significant symptom improvements versus amoxicillin and placebo, without predisposing the patient to disease recurrence or bacterial infection.

Anecortave acetate for the treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization secondary to age-related macular degeneration

PURPOSE

Anecortave acetate is a novel angiostatic cortisene being evaluated clinically for treatment of exudative age-related macular degeneration (ARMD). A randomized, placebo-controlled, efficacy and safety dose duration study of anecortave acetate for depot suspension (3 mg, 15 mg, 30 mg) in this patient population was completed in June 2003. As part of this trial, 128 patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to ARMD were enrolled and treated for up to 2 years by 18 clinical sites in the United States and European Union.

METHODS

Study patients were evaluated clinically with detailed ophthalmic examinations, general physical examinations, assessments of best-corrected logMAR visual acuity, and angiographic evaluations. The Digital Angiography Reading Center (New York City, NY) assessed lesion eligibility while the clinical investigators assessed overall patient eligibility prior to treatment. As part of this study, study medication was delivered as a posterior juxtascleral depot using a specially designed curved cannula at 6-month intervals if in the masked investigator's opinion the patient's lesion could benefit from additional treatment.

RESULTS

The 2-year efficacy results of this placebo-controlled study demonstrated that RETAANE 15 mg (anecortave acetate for depot suspension) was statistically superior to placebo for stabilization of vision (<3 logMAR line change from baseline) and for inhibition of neovascular lesion growth. There were no serious treatment-related safety issues associated with either the study medication or the procedure for administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Anecortave acetate 15 mg for depot suspension is clinically efficacious compared to placebo for treatment of subfoveal exudative ARMD lesions when administered at 6-month intervals as a posterior juxtascleral depot.

Nasal allergies and beyond: a clinical review of the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of mometasone furoate

Mometasone furoate nasal spray (MFNS; Nasonex, Schering-Plough Corporation, Kenilworth, NJ, USA) is an effective and well-tolerated intranasal corticosteroid approved for the prophylactic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis, and the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis. MFNS is a potent molecule with a rapid onset of action and excellent safety and efficacy profiles. Having recently received approval for the treatment of nasal polyposis, data indicate that MFNS may also be effective in rhinosinusitis.

Efficacy and systemic tolerability of mometasone furoate and betamethasone sodium phosphate

This study evaluates the efficacy and systemic tolerability of licensed doses of mometasone furoate (Nasonex) and betamethasone sodium phosphate (Betnesol) in allergic chronic rhinosinusitis patients. It also assesses the diagnostic accuracy of morning salivary cortisol (MSC) concentrations to screen for adrenal suppression in these patients. Forty-eight patients were prospectively randomized to two treatment limbs. Symptom scores and adrenal function assessments were performed immediately prior to commencement and at the end of treatment. One (4 per cent) mometasone furoate and 14 (58 per cent) betamethasone sodium phosphate patients developed biochemical evidence of adrenal suppression. There were statistically significant (p < 0.005) reductions in symptom scores following treatment, but no significant difference (p > 0.05) between the drug groups regarding post-treatment symptom scores. As a screening tool for iatrogenic adrenal suppression, MSC had a sensitivity of 100 per cent and a specificity of 97 per cent. This study demonstrates the high risk of developing adrenal suppression secondary to betamethasone sodium phosphate therapy. The salivary cortisol assay is an accurate tool for monitoring adrenal function and is ideally suited to the out-patient setting.

Efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler vs fluticasone propionate metered-dose inhaler in asthma subjects previously using fluticasone propionate

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) administered once daily in the evening with fluticasone propionate metered-dose inhaler (MDI) administered twice daily.

METHODS

An 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study compared mometasone furoate DPI, 400 microg every evening (1 puff daily), with fluticasone propionate MDI, two 125-microg puffs twice daily, in 167 adults and adolescents with moderate persistent asthma previously using fluticasone propionate. The primary efficacy variable was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to the end point. Variables such as response to therapy and subject satisfaction with the inhaler devices were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Improvement in FEV1 was noted at the week 2 visit with both treatments. This improvement was maintained at the 4- and 8-week visits and at the end point for both groups. The mean percent change in FEV1 from baseline to the end point was 4.58% with mometasone furoate DPI and 6.98% with fluticasone propionate MDI (P = .35). At the end point, physicians rated 62% of the mometasone furoate DPI group as "improved" or "much improved" compared with 47% of the fluticasone propionate MDI group (P = .007). A significantly greater proportion of subjects in the mometasone furoate DPI group "liked the inhaler a lot" vs subjects in the fluticasone propionate MDI group (46.8% vs 22.4%; P = .01). Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Mometasone furoate DPI, 400 microg every evening, provided comparable efficacy as fluticasone propionate MDI, two 125-microg puffs twice daily, in subjects with moderate persistent asthma previously treated with fluticasone propionate.

Safety of posterior juxtascleral depot administration of the angiostatic cortisene anecortave acetate for treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in patients with age-related macular degeneration

BACKGROUND

Anecortave acetate is a synthetic derivative of cortisol, but very specific and irreversible chemical modifications to the cortisol structure have resulted in the creation of a potent inhibitor of blood vessel growth with no evidence non-clinically or clinically of glucocorticoid receptor-mediated bioactivity. The clinical safety of Anecortave Acetate administered as a posterior juxtascleral depot every 6 months for up to 4 years is reviewed in this manuscript.

METHODS

Clinical safety and efficacy of the novel angiostatic agent Anecortave Acetate for Depot Suspension was evaluated in patients with subfoveal exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) in a masked, randomized, dose-duration clinical trial completed in June 2003. This safety and efficacy study enrolled and treated 128 patients at 18 clinical sites in the US and EU. This was the first clinical trial of Anecortave Acetate for Depot Suspension administered as a posterior juxtascleral depot. Assessments of clinical safety were made with general physical examinations including electrocardiograms and hematology/serum chemistry/urinalysis, detailed ophthalmic evaluations with fluorescein/indocyanine green angiography and assessments of best-corrected logMAR visual acuity. All safety reports have been reviewed periodically by an Independent Safety Committee responsible for overseeing these activities.

RESULTS

No clinically relevant safety issues related to either Anecortave Acetate for Depot Suspension or the administration procedure have been identified by an Independent Safety Committee. The most frequent safety issues reported were cataractous changes, decreased visual acuity, ptosis, ocular pain, abnormal vision and subconjunctival hemorrhage, but the majority of these were assessed as unrelated to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Anecortave Acetate for Depot Suspension (3, 15 and 30 mg) is clinically safe following administration and re-administration at 6-month intervals as a posterior juxtascleral depot using a specially designed curved cannula.

Clinical Case Notes. Glaucoma from topical corticosteroids to the eyelids

Raised intraocular pressure and glaucoma have rarely been associated with use of periorbital corticosteroids for dermatological conditions such as blepharitis and eczema. Three cases are described in which periorbital topical corticosteroids appear to have resulted in raised intraocular pressure or glaucoma. Topical corticosteroids used for dermatological conditions around the face and eyes are often regarded as being fairly innocuous with regard to ocular side-effects. This case series demonstrates that secondary open-angle glaucoma can be a sight-threatening consequence, and periorbital steroids should therefore be used cautiously and sparingly, particularly in those with a family history of glaucoma. Intraocular pressure may not always return to normal upon cessation of the drug.