Pharmacokinetic optimisation of the treatment of peptic ulcer in patients with renal failure

Evidence-based assessment of proton-pump inhibitors in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review

Peptic ulcer disease continues to be issue especially due to its high prevalence in the developing world. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection associated duodenal ulcers should undergo eradication therapy. There are many regimens offered for H. pylori eradication which include triple, quadruple, or sequential therapy regimens. The central aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the evidence for H. pylori therapy from a meta-analytical outlook. The consequence of the dose, type of proton-pump inhibitor, and the length of the treatment will be debated. The most important risk factor for eradication failure is resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy before and after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Review

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a novel endoscopic procedure first developed in the 1990s which enables en bloc resection of gastric neoplastic lesions that are difficult to resect via conventional endoscopic mucosal resection. However, given that ESD increases the risk of intra- and post-ESD delayed bleeding and that platelet aggregation and coagulation in artificial ulcers after ESD strongly depend on intragastric pH, faster and stronger acid inhibition via proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine 2-receptor antagonists (H(2)RAs) as well as endoscopic hemostasis by thermocoagulation during ESD have been used to prevent ESD-related bleeding. Because PPIs more potently inhibit acid secretion than H(2)RAs, they are often the first-line drugs employed in ESD treatment. However, acid inhibition after the initial infusion of a PPI is weaker in the early phase than that achievable with H(2)RAs; further, PPI effectiveness can vary depending on genetic differences in CYP2C19. Therefore, optimal acid inhibition may require tailored treatment based on CYP2C19 genotype when ESD is performed, with a concomitant infusion of PPI and H(2)RA possibly most effective for patients with the rapid metabolizer CYP2C19 genotype, while PPI alone may be sufficient for those with the intermediate or poor metabolizer genotypes.

Treatment strategy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori infection: impact of pharmacogenomics-based acid inhibition regimen and alternative antibiotics

The eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori by the triple therapy consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antimicrobial agents are mainly influenced by bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents and magnitude of acid inhibition during the treatment with a PPI. Acid inhibition during the treatment is affected by the dosing schemes of acid inhibitory drugs (i.e., PPI), genotypes of drug-metabolizing enzymes (i.e., CYP450 2C19), drug transporters (i.e., multi-drug resistant transporter-1) and inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL-1 beta). Modification of dosing schedules of a PPI, such as frequent PPI dosing and concomitant dosing with a histamine 2-receptor antagonist, could overcome these genetics-related differences in therapeutic effectiveness. For attaining higher eradication rates, the tailored regimen based on the relevant pharmacogenomics is preferable.

Large variations in prescriptions of gastrointestinal medications in hemodialysis patients on three continents: the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS)

Little is known about proton pump inhibitor (PPI) or H(2) receptor antagonist (HA) prescription patterns or regarding use of predictors in hemodialysis patients. Proton pump inhibitor and HA prescribing patterns were investigated in 8628 hemodialysis patients from seven countries enrolled in the prospective, observational Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Logistic regression examined predictors associated with PPI and HA use, adjusting for age, sex, country, time with end-stage renal disease, medications, 14 comorbid conditions, and the association between the number of comorbid conditions and the prescription of gastrointestinal (GI) medications. In a cross-section from February 1, 2000, 3.4% to 36.9% of patients received an HA and 0.8% to 26.9% took a PPI, depending upon the country. From 1996 to 2001, the prescription of HAs declined while PPI use increased. Facility use of HAs and PPIs ranged from 0% to 94% of patients. H2 receptor antagonist or PPI use was significantly and independently associated with age, narcotic use, corticosteroids, acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, coronary artery disease history, cardiovascular diseases other than hypertension or congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary disease, and GI bleed. Proton pump inhibitors or HAs were more likely to be prescribed in Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom than in the United States. The odds of PPI prescription increased if serum phosphorus <5.5 mEq/L or serum albumin <3.5 g/dL. Prescription of GI medications was associated with many comorbidities and use of several medications. Extreme variability of prescription patterns suggests that there is no standard approach in treatment practices.

Efficacy of a 1-week course of proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with and without chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of short-course triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori has been documented in patients with normal renal function. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 1-week proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for H pylori eradication in a prospective study of patients with chronic renal failure (CRF).

METHODS

Forty-two patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or serum creatinine level greater than 2.26 mg/dL (>200 micromol/L; n = 21; CRF group; 12 patients on dialysis therapy) or normal renal function (n = 21; controls) were studied when they had H pylori infection on top of peptic ulcer disease (20 patients) or gastritis (22 patients). The combination of omeprazole, 20 mg twice daily; amoxicillin, 1 g twice daily; and clarithromycin, 500 mg twice daily, was administered for 1 week. All patients underwent repeated endoscopy 4 weeks later for assessment of eradication. Apart from patients on dialysis therapy, all patients had serum creatinine levels and CrCls measured 2 and 4 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

All except 5 patients (2 patients, CRF group; 3 controls) had successful eradication (90.5% versus 85.7%). For patients not on dialysis therapy, serum creatinine levels and CrCls remained stable 4 weeks after treatment (serum creatinine, 3.68 +/- 1.09 versus 3.76 +/- 1.09 mg/dL [325 +/- 96 versus 332 +/- 96 micromol/L]; P = not significant [NS]; CrCl, 21.4 +/- 8.3 versus 22.2 +/- 6.9 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = NS).

CONCLUSION

The 1-week course of proton-pump inhibitor-based triple therapy achieved a high eradication rate of H pylori infection in patients with CRF, similar to controls with normal renal function. The regimen was well tolerated.

Comparison of lansoprazole and famotidine for gastric acid inhibition during the daytime and night-time in different CYP2C19 genotype groups

BACKGROUND

The acid inhibitory effect of lansoprazole depends on the S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase (CYP2C19) genotype status. The effect of famotidine is independent of this genotype.

AIM

To investigate the acid inhibitory effects of lansoprazole vs. famotidine during the daytime and night-time with reference to different CYP2C19 genotypes.

METHODS

Fifteen healthy volunteers were given 20 mg famotidine twice a day or 30 mg lansoprazole once a day for 8 days. On post-dose day 8, 24-h intragastric pH monitoring was performed.

RESULTS

During the daytime, the intragastric pH with lansoprazole was significantly higher than that with famotidine in the heterozygous extensive metabolizer group, whereas no significant difference was observed in the homozygous extensive metabolizer group. During the night-time, the intragastric pH with famotidine was quite similar to that with lansoprazole in the heterozygous extensive metabolizer and poor metabolizer groups. However, during the night-time, the intragastric pH with famotidine was significantly higher than that with lansoprazole in the homozygous extensive metabolizer group.

CONCLUSIONS

An insufficient acid inhibition by lansoprazole during the night-time in the homozygous extensive metabolizer group could be compensated for by famotidine. CYP2C19 genotype testing appears to be useful for predicting the optimal acid inhibitory drug treatment collated with circadian intragastric pH change.

Effectiveness of omeprazole for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal lesions in rheumatoid arthritis patients

Abstract We evaluated the efficacy of omeprazole (OPZ) for the treatment of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) lesions in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Fourteen RA patients with H2 receptor antagonist- (H2RA-) resistant UGI lesions (1 stomal, 11 gastric, and 2 esophageal with reflux esophagitis ulcers) were treated with OPZ at 20 mg/day (study A). New untreated UGI lesions (1 stomal and 12 gastric ulcers) were treated with OPZ (study B). Three patients who showed renal dysfunction during H2RA treatment for UGI lesion were treated with OPZ (study C). Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were not discontinued. The stage of each ulcer was determined by gastrointestinal fiberscopy (GIF). In study A, during the first 8 weeks of OPZ treatment, 1 esophageal and 7 gastric ulcer patients were completely cured. Six patients showing partial response were treated further with OPZ for another 8 weeks. During this second period, 1 stomal and 3 gastric ulcer patients were completely cured, and 1 gastric and 1 esophageal ulcer patient showed only partial response. In study B, after an 8-week OPZ treatment, all except 2 patients showed complete healing. One patient developed mild eruption at 4 weeks and was shifted to H2RA. One patient showed complete healing after 4 weeks. No patient in study C showed renal dysfunction with OPZ. Our results suggest that OPZ is an effective treatment for UGI lesions in RA patients using NSAIDs.

Stabilization and sustained-release effect of misoprostol with methacrylate copolymer

The use of ammonio methacrylate copolymer (Eudrgit RS, RL) to form a sustained-release solid dispersion of Misoprostol can improve and enhance two important physical and chemical properties of Misoprostol. First, the solid dispersion matrix formed by the copolymer can protect Misoprostol from being degraded by water so that its stability is improved. Second, Misoprostol can be slowly released by diffusion from the copolymer matrix. Accelerated stability studies of Misoprostol-Eudragit solid dispersion after storing at various temperatures for different time periods were carried out. According to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses, the stability of Misoprostol in a series of Eudragit appeared significantly improved at different ratios. The Misoprostol-Eudragit dispersion can be used in a powder form, filled in capsules, or compressed into tablets. The dissolution profiles of Misoprostol-Eudragit solid dispersion and its tablets in water, pH 1. 2, 4.5 and 6.8, dissolution media show that this stable solid dispersion is a sustained-release type.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori

As Helicobacter pylori plays an important role in the aetiopathogenesis of peptic ulcer, therapeutic strategies aimed at maintaining long term remission have shifted from the control of intragastric pH to targeting H. pylori. According to recent international guidelines the clinical goals--rapid ulcer healing and prevention of relapse--can be best accomplished by combination therapy consisting of an antisecretory drug (proton pump inhibitor or ranitidine) and 2 antimicrobial agents (preferable amoxicillin, clarithromycin or metronidazole). When applying such multidrug regimens, possible synergy between the agents suggests that pharmacokinetic considerations might help to improve H. pylori eradication rates, which should be above 85 to 90% on an intention-to-treat basis. The present review summarises the pharmacokinetic properties and interaction potential of all drugs presently used in the various H. pylori eradication regimens, with emphasis on particular patient populations such as the elderly and those with renal impairment. The drugs considered are omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole, rabeprazole, ranitidine and ranitidine bismutrex, bismuth salts, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, azithromycin, roxithromycin, metronidazole, tinidazole and tetracycline. When addressing the clinically important questions of the efficacy, safety and costs of the recommended regimens, the impact of drug disposition on H. pylori eradication should not be neglected.

Rabeprazole: pharmacokinetics and tolerability in patients with stable, end-stage renal failure

The authors compare the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety, and tolerability of rabeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor (PPI), in healthy volunteers and in subjects with stable, end-stage renal failure. This single-center, open-label trial included two groups of subjects: 10 healthy males with 24-hour creatinine clearance > or = 90 mL/min/m2 and 10 males with renal failure (24-hour creatinine clearance < or = 5 mL/min/m2) receiving hemodialytic therapy. Normal subjects received a single, oral 20 mg rabeprazole dose. Those with renal failure received a 20 mg dose of rabeprazole on the day after hemodialysis and a second dose after a 2-week washout period during dialysis. Blood samples were drawn before and up to 24 hours after rabeprazole administration for determination of plasma rabeprazole concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography. Safety and tolerability of rabeprazole were determined by reporting adverse events and comparing vital signs, ECG, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests before and during treatment. Comparison of pharmacokinetic results from healthy volunteers with those from subjects with renal failure indicated no clinically significant differences between groups. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences between any pharmacokinetic parameters recorded during or after hemodialysis. Rabeprazole was well tolerated by both groups. Only two drug-related adverse events were reported, and there were no significant treatment-emergent changes in vital signs or ECG. Treatment-emergent changes in hematologic and clinical chemistry parameters were observed for a few subjects in each group and generally represented only slight deviations from the normal range. These results indicate that no dosage adjustment of rabeprazole is required in patients with renal dysfunction. These findings and the well-documented clinical efficacy of this new PPI in patients with gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, or gastroesophageal reflux disease support rabeprazole's use in the treatment of patients with acid peptic disorders.

Review article: the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole in health and disease

Rabeprazole, a newly developed proton pump inhibitor, has been shown to be effective for the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers and for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. It is a rapid and potent inhibitor of gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase, the gastric acid (proton) pump. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) are linearly related to dose, while the time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) and elimination half-life (t1/2) are dose-independent. Rabeprazole is extensively metabolized in the liver via the cytochrome P450 enzyme system, and its metabolites are excreted primarily in the urine. Rabeprazole does not accumulate with repeated dosing. Its bioavailability is not influenced by the coingestion of either food or antacids. The pharmacokinetic profile of rabeprazole is substantially altered in the elderly and patients with stable compensated chronic cirrhosis; however, these alterations are not associated with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory parameters or serious adverse events. The influence of severe decompensated liver disease on the pharmacokinetics of rabeprazole has not been assessed. The pharmacokinetic profile of rabeprazole is not significantly altered by renal dysfunction requiring maintenance haemodialysis. These findings suggest that dosage adjustment is not required in these special patient populations. Caution should be exercised, however, in patients with severe liver disease.