Clinical pharmacokinetics of slow release mesalazine

Rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid induced pancreatitis in a patient with newly diagnosed ulcerative colitis

Oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) are well recognised to have the potential to cause drug-induced acute pancreatitis; however, there have only been infrequent case reports of rectal formulations causing acute pancreatitis. We describe a case of rectal Mesalazine (a 5-ASA) induced acute pancreatitis. The patient was commenced on rectal 5-ASA therapy 8 weeks prior to presentation following a diagnosis of Montreal classification E1 Ulcerative Colitis on colonoscopy. After the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis was confirmed, 5-ASA was ceased and the patient made a clinical full recovery at 2 month follow-up. Despite its reduced systemic absorption, rectal 5-ASA like oral formations must be considered as a potential trigger for acute pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Optimizing 5-aminosalicylate for moderate ulcerative colitis: expert recommendations from the Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition

The lack of clear definition and classification for "moderate ulcerative colitis (UC)" creates ambiguity regarding the suitability of step-up versus top-down treatment approaches. In this paper, experts address crucial gaps in assessing and managing moderate UC. The Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and Africa Inflammatory Bowel Disease Coalition comprised 24 experts who convened to share, discuss and vote electronically on management recommendations for moderate UC. Experts emphasized that the goal of treating UC is to attain clinical, biomarker, and endoscopic remission using cost-effective strategies such as 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs), well-tolerated therapy that can be optimized to improve outcomes. Experts agreed that 5-ASA therapy could be optimized by maximizing dosage (4 g/day for induction of remission), combining oral and topical administration, extending treatment duration beyond 8 weeks, and enhancing patient adherence through personalized counselling and reduced pill burden. Treatment escalation should ideally be reserved for patients with predictors of aggressive disease or those who do not respond to 5-ASA optimization. Premature treatment escalation to advanced therapies (including biologics and oral small molecules) may have long-term health and financial consequences. This paper provides consensus-based expert recommendations and a treatment algorithm, based on current evidence and practices, to assist decision-making in real-world settings.

5-Aminosalicylic Acid Distribution into the Intestinal Membrane Along the Gastrointestinal Tract After Oral Administration in Rats

BACKGROUND

5-Aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), the first-line therapy for ulcerative colitis, is a poorly soluble zwitterionic drug. Unformulated 5-ASA is thought to be extensively absorbed in the small intestine.

METHODS

The pH-dependent solubility of 5-ASA in vitro and the intestinal membrane distribution of 5-ASA and its N-acetyl metabolite (AC-5-ASA) after the oral administration of 5-ASA were examined in fed rats. 5-ASA was administered as a suspension in water, 0.1 M HCl, or 0.1 M NaOH to untreated rats or as a solution in 5% NaHCO3 to lansoprazole-pretreated rats.

RESULTS

5-ASA solubility in vitro was higher at pH < 2 and pH > 7. In rats, the 5-ASA and AC-5-ASA were detected mostly in the small intestine at 3 h and in the colonic region at 8 h after administration. The dosing vehicle (suspension or solution) and lansoprazole pretreatment did not significantly affect the pH of the luminal fluid in rats or the 5-ASA distribution in membranes.

CONCLUSIONS

The 5-ASA distribution in membranes in the proximal intestine was found to be restricted by the intrinsic regional luminal pH, low solubility, and saturable membrane permeability. Unabsorbed 5-ASA in the proximal intestine was delivered to the distal intestine. The higher the oral dose of 5-ASA, the more 5-ASA may be delivered to the distal intestine due to the restricted absorption in the small intestine.

Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling Coupled with Biopredictive Dissolution in Development of Bioequivalent Formulation for Mesalamine Enteric Coated Tablet: A Tough Nut to Crack

Mesalamine is a locally acting anti-inflammatory drug used to treat mild to moderate ulcerative colitis. Because of complex formulation principle and high in vivo variability, development of bioequivalent formulation for mesalamine is challenging. Further, fed state possess significant challenges for bioequivalence (BE) due to interplay of multiple factors. In the work, we have developed a novel biopredictive media for mesalamine enteric coated tablets and integrated into physiologically based biopharmaceutics model (PBBM) to predict in vivo fed behavior. USP III based gradient media was developed to mimic in vivo fed condition. The developed PBBM was initially validated with literature data and subsequently re-optimized with pilot BE study data. Further, virtual bioequivalence (VBE) was performed to evaluate model predictability for pilot BE data. Later, the model was applied for prospective BE predictions with increased subjects and parametric sensitivity analysis was performed to identify physiological factors that can impact in vivo performance. Further, the model was used to predict luminal and enterocyte concentrations in colon to demonstrate equivalent efficacy. Additionally, a novel dissolution/permeation tool (Dissoflux) was employed to compare permeability behavior of formulations. Overall, this work enabled BE prediction for complex mesalamine enteric coated tablets and helped to understand parameters that can impact in vivo performance.

A case of mesalamine potentiating hypoprothrombinemic effect of vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy resulting in life-threatening bleeding

ABSTRACT

A 76-year-old male patient, who underwent a post-aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve in 2006, was on oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin, maintaining a stable therapeutic level of anticoagulation until 2022. He had a new diagnosis of ulcerative colitis in 2022, following which he was started on mesalamine. He had been having a supratherapeutic level of anticoagulation, as evidenced by an international normalized ratio (INR) of 12 to 14 on multiple occasions since 2022, leading to gastrointestinal bleeding, necessitating multiple packed red cell transfusions. He presented to us in August 2024 with severe anemia due to gastrointestinal bleeding. The evaluation revealed severe depletion of vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors. In this report, we discuss the possible drug-drug interactions between mesalamine and vitamin K antagonists, which went unrecognized leading to life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding.

Recent Advances of Halloysite Nanotubes in Biomedical Applications

Halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) have emerged as a highly regarded choice in biomedical research due to their exceptional attributes, including superior loading capacity, customizable surface characteristics, and excellent biocompatibility. HNTs feature tubular structures comprising alumina and silica layers, endowing them with a large surface area and versatile surface chemistries that facilitate selective modifications. Moreover, their substantial pore volume and wide range of pore sizes enable efficient entrapment of diverse functional molecules. This comprehensive review highlights the broad biomedical application spectrum of HNTs, shedding light on their potential as innovative and effective therapeutic agents across various diseases. It emphasizes the necessity of optimizing drug delivery techniques, developing targeted delivery systems, rigorously evaluating biocompatibility and safety through preclinical and clinical investigations, exploring combination therapies, and advancing scientific understanding. With further advancements, HNTs hold the promise to revolutionize the pharmaceutical industry, opening new avenues for the development of transformative treatments.

Budding Multi-matrix Technology-a Retrospective Approach, Deep Insights, and Future Perspectives

The human race is consistently striving for achieving good health and eliminate disease-causing factors. For the last few decades, scientists have been endeavoring to invent and innovate technologies that can substitute the conventional dosage forms and enable targeted and prolonged drug release at a particular site. The novel multi-matrix technology is a type of matrix formulation where the formulation is embraced to have a matrix system with multiple number of matrices. The MMX technology embraces with a combination of outer hydrophilic layer and amphiphilic/lipophilic core layer, within which drug is encapsulated followed by enteric coating for extended/targeted release at the required site. In comparison to conventional oral drug delivery systems and other drug delivery systems, multi-matrix (MMX) technology formulations afford many advantages. Additionally, it attributes for targeting strategy aimed at the colon and offers modified prolonged drug release. Thus, it has emerged rapidly as a potential alternative option in targeted oral drug delivery. However, the development of this MMX technology formulations is a exigent task and also has its own set of limitations. Due to its promising advantages and colon targeting strategy over the other colon targeted drug delivery systems, premier global companies are exploiting its potential. This article review deep insights into the formulation procedures, drug delivery mechanism, advantages, limitations, safety and efficacy studies of various marketed drug formulations of MMX technology including regulatory perspectives and future perspectives.

Determination of Sulphasalazine and its Related Compounds by Simple Smart Validated Green Spectrophotometric Methods

BACKGROUND

Sulphasalazine as a prodrug, its active metabolite (mesalazine) which also is available in pharmaceutical formulations, and the major active metabolite of mesalazine; N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic aid are commonly used for treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

OBJECTIVES

Two accurate, precise, sensitive and specific spectrophotometric methods were developed and validated for determination of the studied components.

METHODS

The first method was modified ratio difference spectrophotometric method. In this method, SZ was determined by measuring the peak area from 410-500 nm, while MZ and AS were determined by measuring the difference of the selected amplitudes values. The second one was mean centering of ratio spectra spectrophotometric method.

RESULTS

The developed method were linear over the concentration range of (2-35), (2-30) and (1-25) µg/mL for sulphasalazine, mesalazine, and N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The developed methods were validated according to ICH guidelines. They were successfully applied for determination of studied analytes. Greenness assessment was evaluated using three different tools.

HIGHLIGHTS

Spectrophotometric methods were developed for determination of SZ and its related compounds for the first time. They were designated to be green and ecofriendly ones and their greenness profiles were evaluated using green solvents to keep the environment clean.

Use of Partial Area Under the Curve in Bioavailability or Bioequivalence Assessments: A Regulatory Perspective

Peak drug concentration (C_max ) and total exposure, such as area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to infinity may be insufficient for assessing relative bioavailability (BA) or bioequivalence (BE) among two products in cases where rapid onset of action or controlled duration of effect is needed to ensure similar drug efficacy. Regulatory agencies have recommended the use of partial AUC (pAUC) as an additional exposure measure for relative BA or BE assessments. The pAUC metric describes pharmacokinetic profiles with the focus on quantification of exposures over specific time intervals to support the determination of relative BA or BE for these drug products in relation to respective reference products. The principles and rationales for using pAUCs are included in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s general BA or BE guidances. Specific pAUC recommendations are also reflected in product-specific guidances for generic drug development published by the FDA. Rationales for the use of pAUCs in relative BA or BE assessments are based on drug-specific and product-specific considerations. This white paper introduces the general framework, including rationales for pAUC recommendations, and provides an overview of the current status, challenges, and the FDA considerations on the use of pAUC for relative BA or BE assessments in the United States.

Pre- and posttherapy assessment of intestinal soluble mediators in IBD: where we stand and future perspectives

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition characterized by an abnormal immune response against food or bacterial antigens in genetically predisposed individuals. Several factors of innate and adaptive immune system take part in the inflammatory process, probably actively contributing in endoscopic and histological healing at molecular level. Although it is difficult to discriminate whether they are primary factors in determining these events or they are secondarily involved, it would be interesting to have a clear map of those factors in order to have a restricted number of potentially "good candidates" for mucosal healing. The present review will present a class of these factors and their modulation in course of therapy, starting from pathogenic studies involving several treatments associated with good clinical outcomes. This approach is meant to help in the difficult task of identifying "good candidates" for healing signatures, which could also be possible new therapeutic targets for clinical management of IBD patients.

Review article: 5-aminosalicylate formulations for the treatment of ulcerative colitis--methods of comparing release rates and delivery of 5-aminosalicylate to the colonic mucosa

BACKGROUND

Many oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) formulations are designed to maximize 5-ASA release in the colon where it acts topically on the colonic mucosa. Delayed-release formulations and azo-prodrugs minimize 5-ASA absorption in the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract.

AIMS

To review methods for assessing 5-ASA release and colonic distribution from oral formulations, and the potential use of this information for guiding clinical decisions.

METHODS

PubMed and recent conference abstracts were searched for articles describing techniques used to assess 5-ASA release from ulcerative colitis (UC) therapies.

RESULTS

In-vitro GI models, although unable to simulate more complex aspects of GI physiology, can provide useful data on 5-ASA release kinetics and bioaccessibility. Gamma-scintigraphy is useful for investigating GI disintegration of different formulations, but may not accurately reflect 5-ASA distribution. Plasma pharmacokinetic studies provide data on systemic exposure, but not on colonic distribution or mucosal uptake. Mucosal biopsies provide direct evidence of colonic distribution and may predict clinical efficacy, but must be interpreted cautiously because of considerable inter-subject variability and other confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

While assessment of 5-ASA release is important, limitations of individual measurement techniques mean that randomized clinical studies in UC patients remain the best guide for dosing and treatment regimen decisions.

Is once-daily mesalazine equivalent to the currently used twice-daily regimen? A study performed in 30 healthy volunteers

A randomized, 2-way, crossover study was conducted in 30 volunteers to compare the pharmacokinetic profile of a new once-daily dosing regimen of mesalazine (1 x 4 g/d) with the current twice-daily dosage (2 x 2 g/d) used in many European countries. The 2 dosages were administrated orally for 8 days, separated by a 2-week washout. Plasma concentrations of mesalazine and N-acetyl-mesalazine were determined on days 1 and 8 by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method and C(max), t(max), and AUCs calculated. The bioequivalence was obtained for a 90% confidence interval of the AUC(0-24h) ratio (test/reference) for mesalazine and N-acetyl-mesalazine on days 1 and 8, within the range of 0.80 to 1.25. The bioequivalence was demonstrated on day 1 for mesalazine and N-acetyl-mesalazine and on day 8 for mesalazine. As it is desirable to offer patients a preparation with a less frequent administration to enhance compliance, this once-daily regimen may be an attractive dosing option.

Colonic targeting of aminosalicylates for the treatment of ulcerative colitis

Aminosalicylates (5-aminosalicylic acid) represent drugs of first choice in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. Two different therapeutic approaches have been employed to target the active 5-aminosalicylic acid to its site of action. Either inactive azo-prodrugs (e.g. sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) or special galenic formulations have been developed for topical delivery of 5-aminosalicylic acid to the colon. However, as intestinal physiology, the extent of ulcerative colitis as well as drug disposition demonstrate large interindividual differences, acute healing rates (40-80%) and the maintenance of remission are quite variable. Apparently, therapeutic effects depend on local concentrations of 5-aminosalicylic acid in the colonic mucosa whereas systemic drug exposure might be one determinant of side effects. In general, 5-aminosalicylic acid is well tolerated and withdrawal from therapy is rare. Following administration of azo-prodrugs (e.g. olsalazine), lower plasma concentrations and higher delivery into the colon of 5-aminosalicylic acid can be observed in comparison to special galenic formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid. Whether such changes in drug disposition will affect therapeutic efficacy remains to be proved by clinical data. Consequently, selection of a particular agent should be based primarily on clinical efficacy, profile of adverse effects, patients' acceptance and economic considerations.

Experience of 5-aminosalicylate nephrotoxicity in the United Kingdom

AIM

To study 5-aminosalicylate nephrotoxicity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in the UK.

METHODS

A detailed postal questionnaire was sent to all 1298 names in the British Society of Gastroenterology database and 290 consultant members of the Renal Association. The British Society of Gastroenterology reported new cases monthly, the Renal Association 6 monthly. Results were expressed as estimated glomerular filtration rate.

RESULTS

Retrospective study: cases--British Society of Gastroenterology:Renal Association 202:87, aged 15-76 years. Median peak (range) creatinine (British Society of Gastroenterology:Renal Association) - 300:301 (78-1200) micromol/L. Prospective study - 59 cases, median age 52 years (M:F ratio: 47:12). Median pre-treatment estimated glomerular filtration rate: 76.9 (123.9-39), at diagnosis 28.4 (80.5-3.6, creatinine range: 92-1361 micromol/L), recovery 46.8 [111.2-end stage renal failure] mL/min/1.73 m2. Recovery of renal function was significantly improved for patients treated for < 12 months [n = 10, median recovery estimated glomerular filtration rate 70.5 (92-26.9) vs. > 12 months 38.4 (111.2-end stage renal failure) mL/min/1.73 m2, P = 0.028].

CONCLUSIONS

Regular monitoring of renal function may allow earlier detection of nephrotoxicity, particularly during the first year of therapy. Based on an inflammatory bowel disease prevalence in the United Kingdom of 412 x 10(5) with about 50% on treatment, we estimate that the incidence of clinical nephrotoxicity in patients taking 5-aminosalicylate therapy is approximately one in 4000 patients/year.

Mesalamine delivery systems: do they really make much difference?

Sulfasalazine's role as the first-line of therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease has led to the development of other "designer" aminosalicylates, which eliminate the sulfa-moiety, and attempt to target the topically active mesalamine to the inflamed bowel. Olsalazine sodium and balsalazide disodium utilize the same azo-bond structure as sulfasalazine, requiring release of active mesalamine by colonic bacteria, and thus targeting these agents to the colon. Other mesalamine delivery systems use pH-dependant- or moisture-release to liberate the active mesalamine in both the large and small bowel. Direct application of mesalamine via enema or suppository is also effective in patients with distal colitis. The pharmacology and thus the undesirable drug absorption rates differ between drugs, although the clinical importance of these characteristics is debatable. Differences in release-systems, the impact of the fed and fasting state, and unique patient intolerances to individual agents demand an understanding of each of these products, and their application to patient therapy.

Topical delivery of therapeutic agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

For targeting local and systemic inflammatory processes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapeutic agents of first choice (e.g. aminosalicylates, corticosteroids) have been developed in special galenic forms to accomplish the topical delivery of the active compounds to the terminal ileum (Crohn's disease) and/or the colon (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis). However, it has to be realized that intestinal physiology (e.g. motility, intraluminal pH profiles), extent and pattern of IBD as well as drug disposition demonstrate large interindividual differences resulting in variable clinical response rates between about 35% and 75%. 5-Aminosalicylate (5-AS) can be delivered to the colon either by azo-prodrugs (e.g. sulfasalazine, olsalazine or balsalazide) or by direct rectal administration of 5-AS in form of enemas, foam or suppositories. Such formulations will be only effective in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Various slow/controlled release preparations of 5-AS have been developed for oral use. Some of them (e.g. Pentasa, Salofalk) release sufficient 5-AS already in the small bowel which could provide some additional benefit in Crohn's disease (CD). As urinary and faecal recoveries of total 5-AS are similar for all oral formulations, no major clinical differences can be expected. Extent of the disease, profile of adverse effects and patient's acceptance provide some guidance for selection of the particular agent. Rectal installation of several glucocorticosteroids has been employed for many years. More recently scientific and clinical interest has been focused on budesonide which is extensively presystemically metabolized in the intestinal wall and the liver. Therefore, its systemic availability is low (10-15%) independent whether budesonide is administered orally as controlled release formulation in patients with CD or rectally as enema in patients with UC. Numerous pharmacokinetic and clinical studies have documented the anticipated topical delivery and clinical efficacy of this corticosteroid without serious side effects such as cushingoid features. It can be assumed that for any novel therapeutic principle in IBD the approach of topical delivery will be also tried.

Gastrointestinal transit and release of 5-aminosalicylic acid from 153Sm-labelled mesalazine pellets vs. tablets in male healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid)-containing formulations, designed to optimize drug delivery to the ileo-caecal region, represent a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases.

AIM

: To test, by means of pharmaco-scintigraphy, whether novel mesalazine-containing pellets release 5-aminosalicylic acid in the same target region as mesalazine tablets (Salofalk).

METHODS

Fourteen healthy male volunteers received a single dose of either pellets or tablets containing 500 mg of mesalazine and 2 mg of 152Sm2O3 with a 1-week washout period. The gastrointestinal transit of 153Sm, incorporated into the formulations, was followed by gamma-scintigraphy. Mesalazine release was verified by assessing 5-aminosalicylic acid plasma pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

The formulations reached the ileo-caecal target region almost at the same time (3.3 +/- 1 and 3.8 +/- 1 h for pellets and tablets, respectively). Plasma 5-aminosalicylic acid tmax values were comparable and corresponded to the time during which the formulations were located in the target region. Plasma AUC values were significantly lower for pellets, which might be explained by a more prolonged release of 5-aminosalicylic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel mesalazine pellets and Salofalk tablets release active 5-aminosalicylic acid in the same target region and pass through the gastrointestinal tract under fasting conditions in healthy volunteers in a comparable time. From a comparison of in vitro dissolution and plasma concentration data, a slower and more prolonged release of 5-aminosalicylic acid from pellets is suggested.

Gastrointestinal transit and 5-ASA release from a new mesalazine extended-release formulation

BACKGROUND

Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid, 5-ASA)-containing formulations represent a cornerstone in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Recently, a new formulation has been developed to provide selective and more homogeneous release of 5-ASA compared to traditional systems.

METHODS

In a first study, gastrointestinal transit was followed by gamma-scintigraphy after single-dose application of tablets containing 1200 mg mesalazine to 12 healthy male volunteers. 5-ASA release was verified by the assessment of plasma pharmacokinetics. In a second, 7-day, multiple-dose study, the steady state plasma pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion and safety profile were characterized after twice-daily tablet administration to 12 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Tablet erosion started after 6.9 +/- 1.1 h in the ascending or transverse colon. Radioactivity spread homogeneously throughout the colon, indicating the sustained release of active 5-ASA. Plasma kinetics indicated an earlier initial absorption of 5-ASA, i.e. during transit of the small intestine and ileum. Mean Cmax values (350.6 +/- 322.6 ng/mL) were observed during location in the ileo-caecal region. The mean relative absorption of 5-ASA was 19.9 +/- 18.2% in the small intestine and ileum and 80.1 +/- 18.2% in the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of the new mesalazine formulation was well tolerated, and 5-ASA was continuously released along the whole colon, a favourable prerequisite for the therapy of distally located inflammatory bowel disease.

Assessment of orocaecal transit time in different localization of Crohn's disease and its possible influence on clinical response to therapy

BACKGROUND

A study on orocaecal transit time (OCTT) in patients with different localizations of Crohn's disease (CD) is not available. Because slow-release drug formulations are increasingly available for the treatment, there is a concrete risk that delayed OCTT may impair the efficacy of these formulations.

AIMS

We investigated OCTT before and after therapy using lactulose H2-breath test and we studied whether OCTT can influence the clinical response to therapy with slow-release mesalazine formulations in adult CD patients.(2)

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied 45 adult patients with non-obstructive CD and Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) <200 (29 men, 16 women; mean age 42 years, range 22-73 years). Twenty patients had ileocolonic, 16 colonic and 9 ileal localization of CD. The control group consisted of 20 healthy subjects (13 men, seven women; mean age 53 years, range 22-71 years). After OCTT assessment, 29 patients were treated with time-dependent mesalazine 3.6 g/day, while 16 patients were treated with pH-dependent mesalazine 3.6 g/day. If bacterial overgrowth was detected, the patients were also treated with rifaximin 800 mg/day for 7 days.

RESULTS

OCTT was delayed (120 min, range 115-210 min) in 30 of the 45 CD patients (67%). Four patients (9%) showed bacterial overgrowth, while OCTT was regular (82.5 min, range 75-90 min) in 11 patients (24%). In the control group, the mean OCTT was 88.2 min (range 75-135 min); (P<0.01). OCTT was more prolonged in ileal localization (182.2 min, range 150-210 min), rather than in patients with ileocolonic (122 min, range 75-180 min) or colonic (106 min, range 75-150 min) localization of CD; (P<0.01). Thirty-nine patients showed normal OCTT after starting therapy (83 min, range 75-105 min), while OCTT remained slightly delayed in the remaining patients (110 min, range 105-115 min); (P<0.01). CDAI was <100 (mean value 83) in all patients with reduction of OCTT to normal value 4 months after starting therapy, while it was >140 (mean value 143) in patients with a slight reduction but not normalization of OCTT respectively (five patients with ileal and one with ileocolonic localization of CD) with a statistically significant correlation between OCTT and CDAI (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows clearly for the first time that OCTT is not only delayed in patients with active CD, but also that it is prolonged in ileal and ileocolonic rather than colonic localization of CD. Moreover we obtained these results using a simple, sensitive, non-invasive and repeatable method, namely, a lactulose hydrogen breath test.

Systematic review: the pharmacokinetic profiles of oral mesalazine formulations and mesalazine pro-drugs used in the management of ulcerative colitis

AIM

: To quantify through systematic review the pharmacokinetic profiles of the oral delayed release and sustained release mesalazine (5-aminosalicylate, 5ASA) formulations (Asacol, Salofalk, Mesasal, Claversal, Pentasa) and pro-drugs (sulfasalazine, olsalazine, balsalazide) used in the management of ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

: Selected articles had: (1) adult healthy volunteers or patients with ulcerative colitis and (2) quantification of pharmacokinetic data to include, at a minimum, urinary excretion of total 5ASA [5ASA plus N-Acetyl-5ASA (N-Ac-5ASA)].

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

: Pharmacokinetic data (Tmax, Cmax, AUC, urinary excretion, faecal excretion) of 5ASA, its major metabolite N-Acetyl-5ASA, total 5ASA, and the parent pro-drug compounds was extracted.

MAIN RESULTS

: The summary results for urinary excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 11-33% or median 22%; olsalazine mean 14-31% or median 16-27%; balsalazide mean 12-35% or median 20%; Asacol mean 10-35% or median 18-40%; Pentasa mean 15-53% or median 23-34%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 27-56% or median 31-44%. The summary results for faecal excretion of total 5ASA over 24-96 h in all subjects (either mean or median) were: sulfasalazine mean 23-75% or median 38%; olsalazine mean 47-50% or median 17-36%; balsalazide mean 46% or median 22%; Asacol mean 40-64% or median 20-56%; Pentasa mean 12-51% or median 39-59%; Salofalk, Mesasal and Claversal mean 37-44% or median 23-35%.

CONCLUSIONS

: The systemic exposure to 5ASA, as measured by urinary excretion of total 5ASA, and the faecal excretion of total 5ASA is comparable for all oral mesalazine formulations and pro-drugs. Thus, selection of a mesalazine therapy for the treatment of ulcerative colitis should be based on other factors such as efficacy, dose-response, toxicity of the parent compound and its metabolites, compliance issues related to dose forms and dosing schedules, and costs.

Colonic delivery of 4-aminosalicylic acid using amylose-ethylcellulose-coated hydroxypropylmethylcellulose capsules

BACKGROUND

4-Aminosalicylic acid has the potential for use in the treatment of diseases of the colon.

AIM

To assess the feasibility of delivering 4-aminosalicylic acid directly to the colon using a hydroxypropylmethylcellulose capsule coated with a mixture of amylose, a polysaccharide metabolized by bacterial enzymes in the colon, and ethylcellulose.

METHODS

Seven healthy male volunteers received, on three separate occasions, an uncoated or amylose-ethylcellulose-coated hydroxypropylmethylcellulose capsule containing 4-aminosalicylic acid Na (550 mg), or an intravenous injection of 4-aminosalicylic acid Na (135 mg). The capsules were radiolabelled with 99mTc to allow their positions in the gastrointestinal tract to be followed using a gamma camera. Plasma and urine samples were collected and assayed for 4-aminosalicylic acid and metabolite concentrations.

RESULTS

The uncoated capsules broke down within 10 min in the stomach, allowing rapid and complete absorption of the drug. The coated capsules remained intact in the upper gastrointestinal tract, and had a median gastric emptying time of 61 min (interquartile range, 77 min) and a median colon arrival time of 363 min (interquartile range, 185 min). For the coated capsules, only the metabolite was detected in the plasma and/or urine after the capsules had reached the colon.

CONCLUSIONS

The specific coating protected the drug until the capsule reached the colon, where 4-aminosalicylic acid was slowly released and absorbed. Thus, such a formulation has the potential for use in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

This review describes the pharmacokinetics of the major drugs used for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. This information can be helpful for the selection of a particular agent and offers guidance for effective and well tolerated regimens. The corticosteroids have a short elimination half-life (t1/2beta) of 1.5 to 4 hours, but their biological half-lives are much longer (12 to 36 hours). Most are moderate or high clearance drugs that are hepatically eliminated, primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4-mediated metabolism. Prednisone and budesonide undergo presystemic elimination. Any disease state or comedication affecting CYP3A4 activity should be taken into account when prescribing corticosteroids. Depending on the preparation used, 10 to 50% of an oral or rectal dose of mesalazine is absorbed. Rapid acetylation in the intestinal wall and liver (t1/2beta 0.5 to 2 hours) and transport probably by P-glycoprotein affect mucosal concentrations of mesalazine, which apparently determine clinical response. Any clinical condition influencing the release and topical availability of mesalazine might modify its therapeutic potential. Metronidazole has high (approximately 90%) oral bioavailability, with hepatic elimination characterised by a t1/2beta of 6 to 10 hours and a total clearance of about 4 L/h/kg. Ciprofloxacin is largely excreted unchanged both renally (about 45% of dose) and extrarenally (25%), with a relatively short t1/2beta (3.5 to 7 hours). Thus, renal function affects the systemic availability of ciprofloxacin. Both mercaptopurine and its prodrug azathioprine are metabolised to active compounds (6-thioguanine nucleotides; 6-TGN) by hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase and to inactive metabolites by the polymorphically expressed thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) and xanthine oxidase. Patients with low TPMT activity have a higher risk of developing haemopoietic toxicity. Both mercaptopurine and azathioprine have a short t1/2beta (1 to 2 hours), but the t1/2beta of 6-TGN ranges from 3 to 13 days. Therapeutic response seems to be related to 6-TGN concentration. Almost complete bioavailability has been observed after intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of methotrexate, which is predominantly (85%) excreted as unchanged drug with a t1/2beta of up to 50 hours. Thus, renal function is the major determinant for disposition of methotrexate. Cyclosporin is slowly and incompletely absorbed. It is extensively metabolised by CYP3A4/5 in the liver and intestine (median t1/2beta and clearance 7.9 hours and 0.46 L/h/kg, respectively), and inhibitors and inducers of CYP3A4 can modify response and toxicity. Infliximab is predominantly distributed to the vascular compartment and eliminated with a t1/2beta between 10 and 14 days. No accumulation was observed when it was administered at intervals of 4 or 8 weeks. Methotrexate may reduce the clearance of infliximab from serum.