Current status of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease management

Non-Ergot Dopamine Agonists and the Risk of Heart Failure and Other Adverse Cardiovascular Reactions in Parkinson's Disease

Reports suggest possible risks of adverse cardiovascular reactions, including heart failure, associated with non-ergot dopamine agonist (DA) use in Parkinson's disease (PD). The objectives of our review were to evaluate the risk of heart failure and other adverse cardiovascular reactions in PD patients who received a non-ergot DA compared with other anti-PD pharmacological interventions, placebo, or no intervention. Studies were identified via searches of six bibliographic databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) were eligible for study inclusion. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed to estimate adverse cardiovascular reaction risks. Quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. In total, forty-four studies (thirty-six RCTs and eight NRS) satisfied our inclusion criteria. A single RCT found no significant difference in the risk of heart failure with ropinirole compared with bromocriptine (odds ratio (OR) 0.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 2.04; low certainty). Conversely, three case-control studies reported a risk of heart failure with non-ergot DA treatment. The quality of evidence for the risk of heart failure was judged as low or very low. Findings suggest that non-ergot DA use may be associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including heart failure. Studies are needed to better understand cardiovascular risks associated with PD treatment.

Developing a Multi-target Model to Predict the Activity of Monoamine Oxidase A and B Drugs

INTRODUCTION

Monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) are compounds largely used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders since they are closely related to the MAO enzymes activity. The two isoforms of the MAO enzymes, MAO-A and MAO-B, are responsible for the degradation of monoamine neurotransmitters and due to this, relevant efforts have been devoted to finding new compounds with more selectivity and less side effects. One of the most used approaches is based on the use of computational approaches since they are time and money-saving and may allow us to find a more relevant structure-activity relationship.

OBJECTIVE

In this manuscript, we will review the most relevant computational approaches aimed at the prediction and development of new MAO inhibitors. Subsequently, we will also introduce a new multitask model aimed at predicting MAO-A and MAO-B inhibitors.

METHODS

The QSAR multi-task model herein developed was based on the use of the linear discriminant analysis. This model was developed gathering 5,759 compounds from the public dataset Chembl. The molecular descriptors used was calculated using the Dragon software. Classical statistical tests were performed to check the validity and robustness of the model.

RESULTS

The herein proposed model is able to correctly classify all the 5,759 compounds. All the statistical performed tests indicated that this model is robust and reproducible.

CONCLUSION

MAOIs are compounds of large interest since they are largely used in the treatment of very serious illness. These inhibitors may lose efficacy and produce severe side effects. Due to this, the development of selective MAO-A or MAO-B inhibitors is crucial for the treatment of these diseases and their effects. The herein proposed multi-target QSAR model may be a relevant tool in the development of new and more selective MAO inhibitors.

Hypotension and bradycardia, a serious adverse effect of piribedil, a case report and literature review

Background

Dopamine agonists (DAs) are efficacious for the treatment of motor and nonmotor symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The treatment of PD with DAs is often complicated by adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic origins. The DA piribedil is widely used in Asian, European, and Latin American countries; therefore, its ADRs are pertinent to clinicians. Here we present a rare case of hypotension and bradycardia that is significantly related to the dosage of piribedil.

Case presentation

A middle-aged male, diagnosed with PD, received dopamine replacement with piribedil. When taking 50 mg piribedil daily dose, the patient didn’t feel any discomfort. Two hours after taking 100 mg piribedil he presented with serious concomitant hypotension and bradycardia with a blood pressure (BP) reading of 85/48 mmHg and a heart rate (HR) of 45 beats/min when sitting. After taking 75 mg piribedil, the patient showed the same symptoms with BP reading at 70/45 mmHg and HR of 47 beats/min in the same position. Upon replacing treatment with pramipexole 0.125 mg, 0.25 mg, and 0.375 mg three times a day, no further cardiovascular effects persisted.

Conclusions

No studies have previously reported the simultaneous observation of position-unrelated hypotension and bradycardia after taking small doses of piribedil. More studies are needed to explore the effects of DAs on BP and HR, especially piribedil. Piribedil is efficacious for the treatment of PD, but it is important to weigh the potential risk of hypotension and bradycardia against the clinical benefits of this drug.

Therapeutics in the Neurorehabilitation of Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) affects 1 percent of the population over the age of 65. The number of people with this disorder is steadily rising. Therapy for PD remains primarily pharmacologic, with medications that target the depleted dopaminergic system being the mainstay of therapy. Surgical therapies, both ablative and stimulatory, are in creasingly being used for patients with more advanced disease and/or complications of drug therapy. Experimental therapies aimed at restoring dopaminergic function and protecting dopaminergic cells are being studied. Alternate neurotransmitter systems are being evaluated as potential targets for therapy. Complete treatment of patients with PD utilizes education, physical therapy, support groups, and medication. When a comprehensive approach is used, PD is treatable and manageable.

Risk of heart failure following treatment with dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease patients

INTRODUCTION

Dopamine agonists (DAs) are frequently used to treat early or advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. They have been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of motor symptoms and for delaying levodopa-induced dyskinesias. However, their utilization is limited by the risk of adverse drug reactions, some of which affect the cardiovascular system. Recently, the US FDA identified a possible association between exposure to pramipexole and the risk of heart failure.

AREAS COVERED

This article begins by reviewing the pharmacodynamic and cardiovascular effects of DAs on PD patients. Pharmacoepidemiological studies about the association between DAs and heart failure are then evaluated.

EXPERT OPINION

Four nested case-control studies were reviewed. In general, results showed higher heart failure risk following use of pramipexole or cabergoline. Although the effects of cabergoline may be explained by the induction of cardiac valve fibrosis, the basis for the significantly increased risk associated with pramipexole is unclear. It remains to be determined if these are dose-related effects, at what point they occur during the course of treatment, and if the risk is the same for all patients irrespective of other potential modifying factors, such as age and sex.

Orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson’s disease

SUMMARY Orthostatic hypotension (OH) is a frequent non-motor symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD), affecting between 22.9 and 38.4% of patients. In PD, OH is related to an increased risk of falls, and possibly to cognitive dysfunction and increased mortality. These data emphasize the importance of its prompt recognition and treatment. OH is related to pre- and post-ganglionic adrenergic denervation, but other factors, such as drugs, heat, meals or alcohol intake, might also induce or aggravate it. Evidence about the efficacy and safety of pharmacological or nonpharmacological strategies for OH treatment in PD is weak. Nonpharmacological measures include liberal addition of salt to the diet, exercise, compression stockings or physical maneuvers. Severe cases may be treated with midodrine or fludrocortisone. Some results suggest that droxidopa and fipamezole may be effective treatments. We finish this review article by discussing the most important unanswered questions about PD-related OH, which may be the focus of future research.

Animal models of Parkinson's disease: a source of novel treatments and clues to the cause of the disease

Animal models of Parkinson's disease (PD) have proved highly effective in the discovery of novel treatments for motor symptoms of PD and in the search for clues to the underlying cause of the illness. Models based on specific pathogenic mechanisms may subsequently lead to the development of neuroprotective agents for PD that stop or slow disease progression. The array of available rodent models is large and ranges from acute pharmacological models, such as the reserpine- or haloperidol-treated rats that display one or more parkinsonian signs, to models exhibiting destruction of the dopaminergic nigro-striatal pathway, such as the classical 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rat and 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) mouse models. All of these have provided test beds in which new molecules for treating the motor symptoms of PD can be assessed. In addition, the emergence of abnormal involuntary movements (AIMs) with repeated treatment of 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with L-DOPA has allowed for examination of the mechanisms responsible for treatment-related dyskinesia in PD, and the detection of molecules able to prevent or reverse their appearance. Other toxin-based models of nigro-striatal tract degeneration include the systemic administration of the pesticides rotenone and paraquat, but whilst providing clues to disease pathogenesis, these are not so commonly used for drug development. The MPTP-treated primate model of PD, which closely mimics the clinical features of PD and in which all currently used anti-parkinsonian medications have been shown to be effective, is undoubtedly the most clinically-relevant of all available models. The MPTP-treated primate develops clear dyskinesia when repeatedly exposed to L-DOPA, and these parkinsonian animals have shown responses to novel dopaminergic agents that are highly predictive of their effect in man. Whether non-dopaminergic drugs show the same degree of predictability of response is a matter of debate. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of PD has improved, so new rodent models produced by agents mimicking these mechanisms, including proteasome inhibitors such as PSI, lactacystin and epoximycin or inflammogens like lipopolysaccharide (LPS) have been developed. A further generation of models aimed at mimicking the genetic causes of PD has also sprung up. Whilst these newer models have provided further clues to the disease pathology, they have so far been less commonly used for drug development. There is little doubt that the availability of experimental animal models of PD has dramatically altered dopaminergic drug treatment of the illness and the prevention and reversal of drug-related side effects that emerge with disease progression and chronic medication. However, so far, we have made little progress in moving into other pharmacological areas for the treatment of PD, and we have not developed models that reflect the progressive nature of the illness and its complexity in terms of the extent of pathology and biochemical change. Only when this occurs are we likely to make progress in developing agents to stop or slow the disease progression. The overarching question that draws all of these models together in the quest for better drug treatments for PD is how well do they recapitulate the human condition and how predictive are they of successful translation of drugs into the clinic? This article aims to clarify the current position and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of available models.

The involvement of neuroinflammation and kynurenine pathway in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder characterised by loss of dopaminergic neurons and localized neuroinflammation occurring in the midbrain several years before the actual onset of symptoms. Activated microglia themselves release a large number of inflammatory mediators thus perpetuating neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity. The Kynurenine pathway (KP), the main catabolic pathway for tryptophan, is one of the major regulators of the immune response and may also be implicated in the inflammatory response in parkinsonism. The KP generates several neuroactive compounds and therefore has either a neurotoxic or neuroprotective effect. Several of these molecules produced by microglia can activate the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor-signalling pathway, leading to an excitotoxic response. Previous studies have shown that NMDA antagonists can ease symptoms and exert a neuroprotective effect in PD both in vivo and in vitro. There are to date several lines of evidence linking some of the KP intermediates and the neuropathogenesis of PD. Moreover, it is likely that pharmacological modulation of the KP will represent a new therapeutic strategy for PD.

Dopamine receptor agonists for the treatment of early or advanced Parkinson's disease

Dopamine receptor agonists are indicated for the symptomatic treatment of early, moderate or advanced Parkinson's disease as well as for the reduction of levodopa-related motor complications. Ergolinic dopamine agonists, such as bromocriptine or pergolide, were initially developed and marketed, and then non-ergolinic dopamine agonists, such as pramipexole and ropinirole, were introduced, reducing the risk of drug-induced fibrotic reactions. Once-daily, controlled-release oral and transdermal formulations have been developed aiming at providing more stable 24-hour plasma drug concentrations and more convenient administration. A disease-modifying effect of dopamine agonists has not been demonstrated clinically. As with any other drug, dopamine agonists can also cause adverse drug reactions, which can be related or unrelated to dopaminergic hyperactivation. Dopaminergic reactions include nausea, hallucinations, confusion and orthostatic hypotension, among others, which were readily identified in pre-marketing clinical trials. During post-marketing surveillance, important adverse reactions were identified, such as daytime somnolence, impulse-control disorders and heart valve fibrosis. Other issues, including the efficacy of dopamine agonists for the treatment of non-motor symptoms, remain under evaluation.

A comparison of sumanirole versus placebo or ropinirole for the treatment of patients with early Parkinson's disease

To assess the safety and efficacy of sumanirole, a highly selective dopamine agonist, versus placebo and demonstrate its noninferiority to ropinirole, 614 patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) were treated with sumanirole, 1 to 16 mg/day; ropinirole, 0.75 to 24 mg/day; or placebo. Primary end point in this flexible-dose, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study of 40 weeks was the change in total sum of the United Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II + III scores from baseline to end of maintenance. Approximately half the subjects in the sumanirole and placebo groups withdrew early from the study, most (51.8% and 68.5%, respectively) due to lack of efficacy. Of the ropinirole subjects who withdrew (50.5%), most discontinued because of adverse events. In sumanirole and ropinirole groups, mean changes from baseline of -2.48 and -5.20 in UPDRS II + III mean scores were significant versus 0.38 in the placebo group (P </= 0.006). Sumanirole and ropinirole are effective in the treatment of patients with early PD when compared with placebo. Noninferiority of sumanirole to ropinirole was not demonstrated, with a difference of 2.70 (90% CI, 0.92-4.49). Sumanirole was better tolerated than ropinirole.

Sumanirole, a highly dopamine D2-selective receptor agonist: in vitro and in vivo pharmacological characterization and efficacy in animal models of Parkinson's disease

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that sumanirole is a novel dopamine receptor agonist with high in vitro and in vivo selectivity for the D(2) receptor subtype. Sumanirole, (R)-5,6-dihydro-5-(methylamino)-4H-imidazo[4,5,1-ij]quinolin-2(1H)-one (Z)-2-butenedioate (1:1), is unique; it has greater than 200-fold selectivity for the D(2) receptor subtype versus the other dopamine receptor subtypes in radioligand binding assays. In cell-based assays, sumanirole is a fully efficacious agonist, with EC(50) values between 17 and 75 nM. In animals, sumanirole elicits many physiological responses attributed to D(2)-like receptor function. In rats, sumanirole is a full agonist for elevation of striatal acetylcholine levels (ED(50) = 12.1 micromol/kg i.p.). Sumanirole s.c. dose dependently decreased plasma prolactin levels and depressed dopamine neuron firing rates in the substantia nigra pars compacta with an ED(50) of 2.3 micromol/kg i.v. This high selectivity for D(2) receptors translates into excellent locomotor stimulant activity in animal models of Parkinson's disease. In reserpinized, alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine-treated rats, sumanirole caused a significant and sustained increase in horizontal activity at doses > or =12.5 micromol/kg s.c. In unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats, sumanirole caused profound, sustained rotational behavior and was substantially more efficacious than any other agonist tested. Sumanirole-stimulated rotational behavior was blocked by the dopamine receptor antagonist haloperidol. Sumanirole dose dependently improved disability scores and locomotor activities of two of three 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-lesioned monkeys. In summary, sumanirole is the first published selective D(2) receptor agonist. The compound has activity in animal models of dopamine hypofunction and has a high level of efficacy in animal models of Parkinson's disease.

Subcutaneous Apomorphine

Apomorphine, a short-acting dopamine D1 and D2 receptor agonist, was the first dopamine receptor agonist used to treat Parkinson's disease. Subcutaneous apomorphine is currently used for the management of sudden, unexpected and refractory levodopa-induced 'off' states in fluctuating Parkinson's disease either as intermittent rescue injections or continuous infusions. Other indications include the challenge test for determining the dopaminergic responsiveness and finding the appropriate dose of the drug in intermittent subcutaneous administration. Except for a rapid on- and offset of the antiparkinsonian response with subcutaneous apomorphine, the magnitude and pattern of the motor response to single dose of subcutaneously administered apomorphine is qualitatively comparable to that of oral levodopa. Seventy-five percent of patients achieve a clinically significant improvement with a dose of apomorphine 4mg. The efficacy of intermittent subcutaneous apomorphine injections as an add-on to levodopa therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease was explored in one short-term, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, one short-term and six long-term, open-label, uncontrolled studies, including a total of 195 patients. These studies provide evidence that this mode of administration was successful in aborting 'off' periods and improving Parkinson's disease motor scores, but tended to increase dyskinesias. No levodopa-sparing effect was observed. Eleven long-term, open-label, uncontrolled studies, including a total of 233 patients evaluated the efficacy of continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions in monotherapy or as an add-on to levodopa therapy in advanced Parkinson's disease. These studies proved that subcutaneous apomorphine infusions are successful in aborting 'off' periods, reducing dyskinesias and improving Parkinson's disease motor scores with the added benefit of a substantial levodopa-sparing effect. The apomorphine challenge test has at least 80% overall predictive ability to clinically diagnose Parkinson's disease across the different stages of the disease and parkinsonian syndromes. Similarly, those data also indicate that the apomorphine challenge test has a >80% ability to predict dopaminergic responsiveness across all stages of Parkinson's disease. Adverse events are usually mild and consist predominantly of cutaneous reactions and neuropsychiatric adverse effects. The incidence of adverse effects is higher in patients receiving continuous infusion than in those receiving intermittent pulsatile administration. Based on the results of these studies it is recommended that subcutaneous apomorphine either as intermittent injections or continuous infusions should be offered to any suitable Parkinson's disease patient who has difficulties in his/her management with conventional therapy. Low-dose levodopa therapy in combination with waking-day hours subcutaneous apomorphine infusion would probably be the most efficient treatment. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions should be evaluated before more invasive measures or neurosurgical interventions are contemplated.

Rationale for current therapies in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that affects an estimated 1 million people in the US and tens of millions worldwide. Medication therapy has made significant advances and improvements especially over the last 10 years. A number of new treatments and new strategies have emerged and the quality of life for the average sufferer has improved. This review will describe the rationale and strategies for current medical therapies in PD, with special emphasis on the use of antipsychotic agents. Levodopa remains the most efficacious medication for the management of PD. Long-term use of levodopa, however, is associated with the development of motor fluctuations including dyskinesia. Trials with dopamine agonists have demonstrated a delay in the onset of dyskinesia with the use of this therapy. There is also active, ongoing investigation to determine whether a neuroprotective effect may be present with agonist therapy. Anticholinergics have been successfully used to treat tremor as well as sialorrhoea and urinary urgency. Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors increase 'on time', decrease 'off time,' and improve motor scores. Continuous stimulation of dopamine receptors may decrease the fluctations observed with pulsatile delivery of anti-Parkinsonian medications, but this will require more study. Monoamine oxidase-B inhibitors, specifically selegiline, may provide symptomatic improvement; the question as to whether a neuroprotective benefit is present remains unanswered. Amantadine has demonstrated both symptomatic benefit and dyskinesia benefit in some patients. Selective dopamine blockers such as clozaril and quetiapine, have been shown to be effective in the treatment of psychosis. This class of medications is particularly useful as an adjunctive to levodopa and dopamine agonists. Doses of dopaminergic drugs can be escalated to treat Parkinsonian symptoms, whereas selective dopamine blockers can be added to block psychosis. Old management strategies required a reduction in dopaminergic therapy and therefore worsened Parkinsonian symptoms. Even though there have been great advances in the medical options for symptomatic management of PD, there are still many unmet needs for this patient population.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses, based on dopamine D2-receptor occupancy of bromocriptine, of bromocriptine-induced contralateral rotations in unilaterally 6-OHDA-lesioned rats

Bromocriptine is a selective agonist for dopamine D2-receptors and is used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. In this study, we performed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) analyses of the antiparkinsonian effect of bromocriptine and evaluated drug-induced contralateral rotations in rats in which unilateral striatal lesions had been generated by microinjection of 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) into the medial forebrain bundle. The plasma concentration (Cp) and D2 receptor occupancy (Phi(D2)) were quantitated by HPLC and with an in vivo back-titration method using [(3)H]-raclopride, respectively. Bromocriptine induced contralateral rotations (E(rot)) in a dose-dependent manner following intraperitoneal administration in an animal model of Parkinson's disease. The Cp of bromocriptine peaked at 15-30 min after the administration and decreased time-dependently, whereas the Phi(D2) of bromocriptine increased gradually for 180 min after administration. The relationship between Cp and E(rot) exhibited an anticlockwise hysteresis, whereas the relationship between Phi(D2) and E(rot) showed a linear correlation. These results suggest that in vivo Phi(D2) is a good pharmacological indicator of the effect of a D2 agonist.

Bromocriptine augmentation therapy in a patient with Cotard's syndrome

A 72-year-old female with bipolar I disorder developed Cotard's syndrome, i.e., various delusions of negation accompanied by severe depressive symptoms. She responded neither to the combination of antipsychotic drug and antidepressant nor to the lithium augmentation therapy. However, the delusions and depressive symptoms improved dramatically after the addition of bromocriptine 2.5-5 mg/day to the combination of clomipramine and lithium. This report suggests that bromocriptine augmentation therapy might be effective at least for some patients with Cotard's syndrome in mood disorders.

Open-label pilot study of bupropion plus bromocriptine for treatment of cocaine dependence

Combinations of medications are often used in neuropsychiatry to enhance treatment efficacy. This 8-week, open-label study tested the combination of bupropion (< or =300 mg) and bromocriptine (< or =7.5 mg) daily in 34 cocaine-dependent (DSM-IIIR) outpatients also receiving weekly individual counseling. The first 18 subjects spent one week at maximum dose; the next 16 spent three weeks. Both groups showed significant reductions in self-reported cocaine use, with no significant change in proportion of urine toxicology tests positive for cocaine. There were no significant differences in outcome between groups. These results suggest that the combination of bupropion and bromocriptine is safe in cocaine addicts, but provide ambiguous evidence of its efficacy.

Dose-dependent augmentation effect of bromocriptine in a case with refractory depression

1. A 52-year-old female with refractory depression had not responded to various treatments including electroconvulsive therapy and augmentation therapy with lithium or triiodothyronine. 2. Addition of bromocriptine 2.5-5 mg/day to imipramine improved her depressive symptoms. However, when the dose was increased to 15 mg/day to treat residual depressive symptoms, her clinical status deteriorated and returned to the original level. The dose reduction to 5mg/day again improved her depressive symptoms. 3. This report confirms the augmentation effect of bromocriptine for refractory depression. It also suggests that there is dose-dependency in this effect.

Dopamine agonists and analogues have an antiproliferative effect on CHO-K1 cells

Epidemiological studies have shown a reduced incidence of cancer in Parkinson's disease. Since nearly all parkinsonian patients with clinical impairment are treated with L-beta-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) and dopamine (DA)ergic agonists, a possibility exists that these therapeutic agents can influence the risk of cancer. We studied the antiproliferative effect of these therapeutic agents (and substances structurally correlated) on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-K1 cell growth. Among the compounds tested, apomorphine proved to be the most potent inhibitor of CHO-K1 cell growth, with an EC(50) of 3.35 +/- 0.12 micro M. The apomorphine analogues, apocodeine and hydroxyethylnorapomorphine, were less active as inhibitors of CHO-K1 cell growth. The activity of DA, 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), phenylethylamine (PEA), L-DOPA and bromocriptine as antiproliferative was one order of magnitude lower than that of apomorphine while pergolide was ineffective. To test whether or not the oxidative potential of these compounds was important for their antiproliferative effect, several antioxidants were assayed. Among them glutathione (GSH) and dithiothreitol (DTT) were effective in reversing the anti-proliferative effect of apomorphine, DA, 6-OHDA and PEA, conversely they did not work with bromocriptine. GSH and DTT are sulphydryl-reducing agents; while their effect could explain the efficacy against apomorphine, DA and 6-OHDA, it is difficult to understand why they should have any effect on PEA as this substance does not react with sulphydryl groups. The oxidative potential as a mechanism of action was also questioned by the results obtained with dihydrorhodamine 123, a probe that changes its fluorescent emission wave when oxidized. None of the compounds, with the exception of 6-OHDA, had any effect on the fluorescent emission wave of the probe at the maximal concentrations used to inhibit CHO-K1 cell growth. At concentrations five times higher, apomorphine and DA generated reactive oxygen species but PEA and bromocriptine did not. These data demonstrate that the antiproliferative effect of these compounds is not due to their oxidative potential, but another mechanism must be postulated.

Treatment of Parkinson's disease should begin with a dopamine agonist

The occurrence of side effects with long-term levodopa therapy, such as fluctuations in motor performance or abnormal movements, led to a search for new antiparkinsonian drugs. Dopamine agonists include ergot derivatives such as bromocriptine, lisuride, pergolide, and cabergoline and other agents which do not possess the ergot structure such as pramipexole and ropinirole. They all are powerful stimulators of the D2 dopamine receptor which probably underlies their therapeutic effects. The clinical consequences of their binding to other dopamine receptor subtypes (D1 or D3) remains unknown. They are usually prescribed in combination with levodopa when late side effects begin to occur. This review summarizes the available pharmacologic and clinical data to support the early use of dopamine agonists in Parkinson's disease. Several strategies can be used, such as monotherapy or "early" or "late" combination with levodopa. Results of recent well-performed, modern clinical trials show that early use of the new dopamine agonists is able to effectively control the clinical symptoms for more than 3 years thereby offering the possibility of delaying the occurrence of levodopa-induced late motor side effects.

Current management of motor fluctuations in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease treated chronically with levodopa

Motor fluctuations after long-term administration of levodopa may be due to central pharmacodynamic mechanisms such as reduced striatal synthesis and storage of dopamine from exogenous levodopa and subsensitization of postsynaptic dopaminergic receptors. Peripheral pharmacokinetic mechanisms may be equally important, particularly in motor fluctuations of the "delayed on" (increased time latencies from dose intake to start-up of clinical benefit) and "no-on" (complete failure of a levodopa dose to exert an "on" response) types. Levodopa itself has a very poor solubility. In addition, there is delayed gastric emptying in many advanced patients. Therefore, an oral dose of levodopa may remain in the stomach for long periods of time before it passes into the duodenum where there is immediate absorption. Consequently, in order to overcome response fluctuations caused by impaired pharmacokinetic mechanisms and to improve its absorption, we recommend that levodopa be taken in multiple small doses, on an empty stomach, preferably crushed and mixed with a lot of liquid. Protein intake should be minimized. Prokinetic drugs such as prepulsid (Cisaprid) could be used to facilitate gastric motility and levodopa transit time. Administration of crushed levodopa through nasoduodenal or gastrojejunostomy tubes may be helpful in certain circumstances. Bypassing the stomach with subcutaneous injections of apomorphine may provide dramatic rescue from difficult "off" situations. Oral and s.c. administration of novel, extremely soluble prodrugs of levodopa, e.g., levodopa ethylester, may offer a new approach to overcome difficulties in levodopa absorption. Addition of dopamine agonists, MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors and controlled release levodopa preparations may be helpful in prolonging the duration of efficacy of each single levodopa dose. Levodopa, administered orally, usually combined with peripheral dopa decarboxylase inhibitors, continues to be the most widely-used and most effective pharmacological treatment for Parkinson's disease (Melamed, 1987). Undoubtedly, the outstanding therapeutic success of levodopa represents a dramatic and revolutionary breakthrough in medicine, in general, and in neurology, in particular. Although, since the introduction of levodopa, there have been many additional pharmacological and even surgical anti-parkinsonian strategies, it still stands out as a mandatory axis of treatment in the majority of patients (Steigler and Quinn, 1992). Indeed, levodopa therapy improves, sometimes markedly, the motor signs and symptoms of the illness, the functional capacity and quality of life and perhaps also life expectancy of the afflicted patients. It is therefore unfortunate that after an initial problem-free period of successful, smooth and stable clinical benefit from levodopa that lasts about two to five years, the responsiveness of many patients worsens with the emergence of a variety of complications (Marsden et al., 1982; Hardie et al., 1984). These adverse reactions include dyskinesias and dystonias, psychotic problems and, particularly, the troublesome motor fluctuations (Marsden and Parkes, 1977; Marsden, 1994). The latter phenomenon may be particularly complex, limiting and disabling. It is believed that most patients on long-term levodopa therapy will, sooner or later, develop response fluctuations of varying types and severity (Riley and Lang, 1993). Because of the serious impact of these phenomena on the quality of life and function of the patients, many efforts are now being undertaken to identify the responsible mechanisms and to devise preventive and therapeutic measures.

Dopamine agonists: what is the place of the newer compounds in the treatment of Parkinson's disease?

Three new dopamine agonists (cabergoline, pramipexole, ropinirole) have been put on to the market within the past months to treat patients with Parkinson's disease. Like any marketed dopamine agonists, the new compounds bind to the D2-like receptors. Pramipexole and ropinirole appear to be quite close drugs. Both are selective non ergot D2 (and preferentially D3) agonists, with an elimination half-life of 5 to 10 hours. Conversely, cabergoline is an ergot derivative, less selective for the D2 receptors, with a much longer elimination half-life (60 hours or more). In moderately advanced levodopa treated patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations, cabergoline, pramipexole and ropinirole all do significantly better than placebo in reducing UPDRS motor examination scores, time spent off and daily dose of levodopa. None of the 3 newer agonists proved to do significantly better than bromocriptine in this indication, at the cost of very similar adverse effects. In de novo levodopa naive patients, pramipexole and ropinirole did significantly better than placebo in short-term (few months) follow-up trials, at the cost again of classical dopaminergic adverse effects. Ropinirole was marginally more effective than bromocriptine, while its use induced the same risk of psychosis than the "old" reference agonist. Early treatment with cabergoline, compared with levodopa, in a long-term (5 year) study reduced the relative risk of developping motor complication by more than 50%. A similar study is presently on-going to compare ropinirole and levodopa. Clinical trials to assess putative neuroprotective effects are also on going with ropinirole and pramipexole. Up to now, the available clinical controlled data suggest that the newer dopamine agonists have very similar clinical effects with only minor superiority, if any, versus bromocriptine.

A randomized, double-blind study of a skin patch of a dopaminergic agonist, piribedil, in Parkinson's disease

This randomized, double-blind trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a transdermal system of piribedil on the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease during 3 weeks of treatment administered to three different groups: placebo, one piribedil patch (1 PP), and two (2 PP) piribedil patches. Twenty-seven patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease, treated with L-dopa but not sufficiently controlled, were included in this trial. The test treatment did not demonstrate any clinical efficacy on either the main end point (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score) or the secondary end points (rigidity, bradykinesia, postural, and resting tremor scores). The main adverse events were nausea (11%), vomiting (7.4%), and malaise (7.4%) mainly observed in the placebo group (four of seven patients). The local acceptability of the transdermal system was good. Plasma piribedil concentrations at the end of treatment were 6.74+/-1.10 and 9.31+/-3.33 ng/mL in the 1 PP and 2 PP groups, respectively. These plasma levels could account for the lack of clinical efficacy, because a previous pharmacokinetics-PD study conducted in parkinsonian patients and treated with the intravenous route demonstrated that the critical limits of activity on tremor were between 10 and 30 ng/mL.

Alpha-dihydroergocryptine in Parkinson's disease: a multicentre randomized double blind parallel group study

INTRODUCTION

A multicentre randomized double-blind parallel group study was carried out on 68 patients suffering from idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) treated with L-dopa for at least 1 year with inadequate therapeutic responsiveness. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of alpha-dihydroergocryptine (alpha-DHEC) vs lisuride as an adjunct therapy to L-dopa on dyskinesias and clinical fluctuations (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] part IV), on the symptoms pattern (Columbia University Rating Scale [CURS]), on disability (Northwestern University Disability Scale [NUDS]), and to evaluate the incidence of adverse events.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients (18 males, 14 females with a mean age of 64.5+/-1.5 SEM) were randomized to alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 36 (16 males, 20 females with a mean age of 61.8+/-1.4) to lisuride. The treatment lasted 3 months and the dosage was increased until it reached 60 mg/day of alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 1.2 mg/day of lisuride, while the L-dopa dosage was kept constant in both groups. Per protocol and intention to treat analyses were performed on response variables.

RESULTS

The adjunctive treatment with the two dopamine agonists determined a significant improvement of PD symptoms in both groups. Alpha-dihydroergocryptine showed a superior efficacy in reducing the clinical complications (P < 0.01 by ANOVA). The number of patients complaining of adverse events was 8 out of 32 (25%) for alpha-dihydroergocryptine and 24/36 (67%) for lisuride (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Alpha-dihydroergocryptine effect seems to be superior to that of lisuride both in terms of reduction of L-dopa therapy long term motor complications (UPDRS part IV) as well as in terms of the incidence and severity of adverse events.

Antiparkinsonian potential of interaction of LEK-8829 with bromocriptine

The ergoline derivative, LEK-8829 (9,10-didehydro-N-methyl-(2-propynyl)-6-methyl-8-aminomethylerg oline), has been proposed as a potential atypical antipsychotic drug with antagonistic actions at dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT2 and 5-HT1A receptors (Krisch et al., 1994, 1996). LEK-8829 also induces contralateral turning in rats with 6-hydroxydopamine-induced unilateral lesion of dopamine nigrostriatal neurons. Turning is blocked by SCH-23390 (R(+)-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzaze pine), a dopamine D1 receptor antagonist. It has been suggested that LEK-8829 could have beneficial effects in parkinsonian patients suffering from psychotic episodes induced as a side-effect of antiparkinsonian treatment with dopamine D2 receptor agonists. Therefore, we now investigated the interaction of LEK-8829 with the dopamine D2 receptor agonist bromocriptine (2-bromo-alpha-ergokryptine) in 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Treatment with either LEK-8829 (3 mg kg(-1)) or bromocriptine (3 mg kg(-1)) induced a vigorous contralateral turning response. The cumulated number of turns induced by the treatment with both drugs combined was not significantly different from the cumulated number of turns induced by single-drug treatment. The pretreatment with SCH-23390 (1 mg kg(-1)) did not have a significant effect on the bromocriptine-induced turning but significantly decreased the turning observed after the combined LEK-8829/bromocriptine treatment. We conclude that in the 6-hydroxydopamine model, the turning behaviour mediated by the LEK-8829/bromocriptine combination may be the result of opposing activity of both drugs at dopamine D2 receptors with concomitant stimulation of dopamine D1 receptors by LEK-8829. Therefore, LEK-8829 may have a potential for the therapy of parkinsonism complicated by dopamine D2 receptor agonist drug-induced psychosis.

Glutamate antagonists and Parkinson's disease: a review of clinical data

Several lines of evidence demonstrate that glutamate antagonists can reverse experimental parkinsonism in animals. However, few clinical studies have been undertaken, principally because there is a shortage of glutamate antagonists which are considered safe for human use. This paper details the results of preliminary studies carried out on dextromethorphan, an anti-tussive agent and a weak open-channel blocker of the NMDA receptor; and the cerebral anti-ischaemic drug ifenprodil, a novel non-competitive inhibitor of the polyamine modulatory site on the NMDA receptor. Trials with these two compounds in small groups of parkinsonian volunteers have not demonstrated conclusive symptomatic improvement. These results do not exclude a possible role for NMDA receptor antagonists in the pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's disease, but rather point to the need for developing more potent and safe NMDA antagonists, with better pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles.

Pretreatment with quinpirole inhibits the central antihypertensive effects of rilmenidine and alpha-methyldopa in conscious rats

Treatment of conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) with the dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole causes a short-lasting pressor response and apparent desensitisation to the effects of subsequent injections of quinpirole or central antihypertensives such as clonidine. In the present study, a number of aspects of this apparent desensitisation were investigated. Thirty minutes after intravenous injection of quinpirole into spontaneously hypertensive rats, treatment with the dopamine D2 receptors antagonist raclopride caused a significant fall in blood pressure. At this time point, circulating levels of vasopressin were not significantly different compared to controls. In Brattleboro rats, the pressor response to quinpirole was reduced in the first 15 min after injection, but not difference in blood pressure was observed at later time points. In SHR which had been treated with quinpirole, the central antihypertensive effects of rilmenidine or alpha-methyldopa were significantly inhibited. By contrast, the bradycardia induced by these drugs was similar in quinpirole-treated rats and controls. Quinpirole pretreatment caused an enhancement of the hypotension but a reduction of the reflex tachycardia after intravenous treatment with hydralazine. In SHR treated with methylatropine and quinpirole, the upper plateau of the sympathetic baroreceptor-heart rate reflex curve was reduced. These results show that treatment with quinpirole has marked effects on central sympathetic vasomotor mechanisms which are the target of antihypertensive drugs such as rilmenidine and alpha-methyldopa. At least some of these effects may occur at the level of the sympathetic baroreflex. Moreover, while the effects of quinpirole on sympathetic regulation are prolonged, the initial pressor response is counteracted by an as yet unidentified compensatory mechanism which can be unmasked when quinpirole is displaced from its receptor by dopamine D2 receptor antagonist treatment.

Drug therapy in the management of Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease affects mainly the elderly population and is characterized by tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity and postural abnormalities. As the disease progresses, drug therapy is inevitable and the strategies used aim to correct the imbalance of neurotransmitters in the CNS. Antimuscarinic drugs counteract the excessive effects of acetylcholine while levodopa, dopamine agonists, selegiline and amantadine supplement or enhance the effects of dopamine. Although initially effective, these therapies are not without problems which include tolerance and long-term effects. This article aims to augment the reader's knowledge of the disease and the drug therapies available, including their place in therapy and their potential side-effects.

Inhibition of dopamine neuron firing by pramipexole, a dopamine D3 receptor-preferring agonist: comparison to other dopamine receptor agonists

Pramipexole, an amino-benzathiazole [(S)-4,5,6,7-tetrahydro-N-6-propyl-2, 6-benzothiazolediamine dihydrochloride monohydrate] direct-acting dopamine receptor agonist effective in treating Parkinson's disease, bound selectively and with high affinity to dopamine D2-like receptors, with highest affinity at dopamine D3 receptors. Ergot dopamine receptor agonists (bromocriptine, lisuride, pergolide) bound to both dopamine and non-dopamine receptors. Although all agonists depressed dopamine neuron firing, only pramipexole and quinpirole completely silenced firing when administered in slowly-accumulating doses. High-dose pergolide, but not other ergots, completely suppressed firing when given by a prompt bolus i.v. injection, suggesting efficacy limitations may have involved receptor desensitization for pergolide, but not for bromocriptine and lisuride. We conclude that pramipexole differs from ergot dopamine receptor agonists currently used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease by virtue of its selectivity for dopamine receptors, its preferential affinity for the dopamine D3 receptor subtype, and its greater efficacy for stimulating dopamine receptors, as indicated in these electrophysiology assays.

Pharmacokinetic optimisation in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

The current symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease mainly relies on agents which are able to restore dopaminergic transmission in the nigrostriatal pathway, such as the dopamine precursor levodopa or direct agonists of dopamine receptors. Ancillary strategies include the use of anticholinergic and antiglutamatergic agents or inhibitors of cerebral dopamine catabolism, such as monoamine oxidase type B inhibitors. Levodopa is the most widely used and effective drug. Its peculiar pharmacokinetics are characterised by an extensive presystemic metabolism, overcome by the combined use of extracerebral inhibitors of the enzyme aromatic-amino acid decarboxylase and rapid adsorption in the proximal small bowel by a saturable facilitated transport system shared with other large neutral amino acids. Drug transport from plasma to the brain is mediated by the same carriers operating in the intestinal mucosa. The main strategies to assure reproducibility of both drug intestinal absorption and delivery to the brain and clinical effect include standardisation of levodopa administration with respect to meal times and a controlled dietary protein intake. The levodopa plasma half-life is very short, resulting in marked plasma drug concentration fluctuations which are matched, as the disease progresses, with swings in the therapeutic response ('wearing-off' phenomena). 'Wearing-off' phenomena can be also associated, at the more advanced disease stages with a 'negative', both parkinsonism-exacerbating and dyskinetic effect of levodopa at subtherapeutic plasma concentrations. Dyskinesias may be also related to high-levodopa, excessive plasma concentrations. Recognition of the different levodopa toxic response patterns can be difficult on a clinical basis alone, and simultaneous monitoring of levodopa concentration-effect relationships may prove useful to disclose the underlying mechanism and in planning the correct pharmacokinetic management. Controlled-release levodopa formulations have been developed in an attempt to smooth out fluctuations in plasma profiles and matched therapeutic responses. The delayed levodopa absorption and lower plasma concentrations which characterise controlled-release formulations compared with standard forms must be taken into account when prescribing dosage regimens and can be complicating factors in the management of the advanced disease stages. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characterisation of the other antiparkinsonian agents is hampered by the lack of sensitive and specific analytical methods to measure their very low plasma drug concentrations and by the difficulty in quantitatively assessing overall moderate drug clinical effects. In clinical practice an optimal dosage schedule is still generally found for each patient on an empirical basis. Future strategies should focus on the search for pharmacological agents with a better kinetic profile, particularly a higher and reproducible bioavailability and a predictable relationship between plasma drug concentration and clinical response. Treatments aimed not only at controlling the symptoms, but also at slowing the neurodegenerative process, are currently under intensive investigation.

A study of tolerance to apomorphine

1. The present study was designed to investigate tolerance to several pharmacological effects of apomorphine. 2. Changes in blood pressure, heart rate, plasma noradrenaline levels, rectal temperature, respiratory rate and retching plus vomiting were compared after administration of apomorphine (200 micrograms kg-1, i.v. as a bolus) or saline at different time intervals (30, 120 and 720 min) in four groups of chloralose-anaesthetized dogs. 3. The first administration of apomorphine induced a significant decrease in blood pressure and rectal temperature, a marked rise in heart rate with no change in noradrenaline plasma levels or respiratory rate. Emesis occurred in 71% of the animals. 4. A second administration of apomorphine 30 min later failed to modify blood pressure or heart rate. In contrast, the magnitude of apomorphine-induced changes in blood pressure and heart rate was similar to that observed after the first administration when apomorphine was given 120 or 720 min later. 5. The apomorphine-induced decrease in rectal temperature evoked by a second dose of apomorphine was less marked when given 30 and 120 min after the first dose and unchanged when given 720 min later. 6. The number of animals exhibiting retching and vomiting was lower when apomorphine was reinjected after 30 min than when the time between two successive injections of apomorphine was 120 or 720 min. 7. These results show that tolerance to apomorphine involves its cardiovascular, hypothermic and emetic effects. The time course of tolerance to repeated injections of apomorphine is longer for its hypothermic than for its hypotensive or emetic effects. This suggests a tissue-specific regulation of D2 dopamine receptors to repeated injections of apomorphine.

Dopamine agonists used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease and their selectivity for the D1, D2, and D3 dopamine receptors in human striatum

1. It has been suggested that an ideal antiparkinsonian treatment requires stimulation of both D1 and D2 dopamine receptors. Bromocriptine and lisuride are regarded as pure D2 receptor agonists, whereas pergolide and apomorphine are thought to stimulate both D1 and D2 receptors. 2. The aim of this study was to compare the affinities of bromocriptine, lisuride, pergolide, and apomorphine for the D1, D2, and D3 receptors in postmortem human striatum. The dissociation constants (Ki values) of the dopamine agonists were determined from competition binding experiments with selective radioligands. 3. The Ki values of the orally administered agonists--bromocriptine, pergolide, and lisuride--for the D2 receptors were proportional to their optimal doses against parkinsonism. Ki(D1)/Ki(D2) ratios were 23 for lisuride, 67 for pergolide, 60 for bromocriptine, and 2.6 for apomorphine. Ki(D3)/Ki(D2) ratios were 0.4 for lisuride, 1 for pergolide, 5.4 for bromocriptine, and 21 for apomorphine. 4. The present results support the hypothesis that the antiparkinsonian effect of dopamine agonists is mediated primarily by D2 receptors. Apomorphine is a mixed D1/D2 agonist, but pergolide has no more D1 agonist properties than bromocriptine and lisuride. The role of the D3 receptors is unknown, but their activation might either be associated with the generation of psychiatric side-effects or dyskinesias, or alternatively add to antiparkinsonian activity.

Antiparkinsonian therapies and brain mitochondrial complex I activity

Alterations in complex I activity, one of the enzymatic units of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, have been demonstrated in different tissues from patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Subsequently, we showed that the chronic administration of levodopa can cause alterations in mitochondrial respiratory chain activity in rats, which suggests that the observed deficit in complex I activity in PD might be, at least in part, related to chronic levodopa therapy. Our study assessed the in vitro effects of different antiparkinsonian agents on complex I activity in rat brain. As previously reported, both levodopa and dopamine inhibit complex I activity in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, the two major metabolites of dopamine, homovanillic acid and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid as well as 3-O-methyl-dopa, had little or no effect on complex I activities. Bromocriptine, pergolide, trihexyphenidyl, molindone, and clozapine were all without significant inhibitory effects on mitochondrial function. Although vitamin C and deprenyl did not alter complex I activity, they did prevent the inhibitory effect of both levodopa and dopamine on complex I activity. This work indicates that among the different and usual antiparkinsonian agents, only levodopa and dopamine induced reductions in complex I activity. It also indicates that vitamin C and deprenyl are both effective in preventing the levodopa-induced complex I inhibition. This latter finding provides further support to the use of antioxidants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors as therapeutic strategies in attempts to slow the progression of PD.

Naloxone does not prevent apomorphine-induced emesis or hypotension in dogs

Previous data have shown that apomorphine-induced respiratory depression can be reversed by the opiate antagonist, naloxone. The present study investigates the influence of naloxone on cardiovascular changes and vomiting elicited by apomorphine in dogs. In chloralose-anaesthetized animals, naloxone (0.02 mg/kg i.v.) failed to modify either the decrease in blood pressure and the biphasic changes (bradycardia followed by a long-lasting tachycardia in heart rate or the characteristics (occurrence, latency, duration) of the emesis elicited by apomorphine (200 micrograms/kg i.v.). In contrast, in conscious animals, naloxone (0.02 mg/kg i.v.) increased both the number and the duration (but not latency) of vomiting induced by a lower dose of apomorphine (30 micrograms/kg i.v.). These data show that apomorphine-induced vomiting and arterial hypotension do not involve opiate receptors.

Drug-induced parkinsonism: a review

The main clinical features, pathophysiology and underlying mechanisms of drug-induced parkinsonism are reviewed. The clinical manifestations of drug-induced parkinsonism are often indistinguishable from idiopathic Parkinson's disease. However, some subtle differences may exist: for example drug-induced parkinsonism is often associated with tardive dyskinesias, bilateral symptoms and the absence of resting tremor, etc. Besides toxins (eg manganese, carbon monoxide or MPTP), many drugs are known to produce parkinsonism: dopamine blocking drugs (true neuroleptics used as antipsychotics: phenothiazines, butyrophenones, thioxanthenes but also sulpiride, "hidden" neuroleptics prescribed as anti-nausea or anti-vomiting drugs (such as metoclopramide and other benzamide derivatives), dopamine depleting drugs (reserpine, tetrabenazine), alpha-methyldopa, calcium channel blockers (flunarizine, cinnarizine, etc). The putative role of other drugs (eg fluoxetine, lithium, amiodarone) as well as the therapeutic management of this side effect are reviewed.

Memantine, amantadine, and L-deprenyl potentiate the action of L-dopa in monoamine-depleted rats

Some treatments used for Parkinson's disease attenuate locomotor depression in rats treated with reserpine and alpha-methyl-p-tyrosine. In the present study memantine (2.5, 5.0 mg/kg), amantadine (10, 20 mg/kg) (both uncompetitive NMDA antagonists), and L-deprenyl (1.0, 5.0 mg/kg; MAO-B inhibitor) were tested for possible synergistic interactions with the dopamine agonists: bromocriptine (2.5, 5.0 mg/kg) and L-dopa (50, 100 mg/kg, +benserazide, 100 mg/kg). At higher doses, memantine (10 mg/kg), amantadine (40 mg/kg), bromocriptine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and L-dopa (100, 200 mg/kg) but not L-deprenyl (up to 10 mg/kg) produced a pronounced increase in locomotor activity when given alone. The combination of memantine, amantadine and L-deprenyl with bromocriptine did not result in synergism of action and, at best, an additive effect was seen. On the other hand the combination of these agents with L-dopa produced a pronounced synergistic effect. Hence, the clinical observation that coadministration of L-dopa with either memantine or amantadine results in enhancement of their action is also reflected in an animal model of Parkinson's disease. Such a combination therapy should allow the use of lower doses of both drugs which may reduce the occurrence of side effects and may also be predicted to have additional benefits related to the neuroprotective properties of memantine, amantadine, and L-deprenyl.