Pharmacological Management of First-Episode Schizophrenia and Related Nonaffective Psychoses

Impact of early use of long-acting injectable antipsychotics on functional outcome in first episode psychosis: a 3-year longitudinal study

OBJECTIVES

To describe, in a naturalistic setting, the impact of the early use of LAI-AP on functional outcomes of early psychosis patients as compared to oral antipsychotics (OAP).

METHODS

Longitudinal prospective 3-year naturalistic study of all consecutive admissions (n = 416) to two Early intervention services (EIS) for psychosis comparing baseline characteristics and the evolution of global functioning, occupation (work and studies), and living arrangements autonomy according to the route of administration of the antipsychotic medication. The cohort was divided into four groups: LAI-AP first (started on LAI-AP and later received OAP), OAP first, LAI-AP only, and OAP only.

RESULTS

Global assessment of functioning (GAF) improved in all groups, but our mixed-effect model did not show any significant association between the route of administration and the GAF outcome. The LAI-AP only group was significantly less likely to have extreme residential instability at 3 years than the other groups despite its highest proportion of homeless youth and their poor prognostic factors at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Our naturalistic study suggests a significant protective effect of LAI-AP on extreme residential instability for the most vulnerable patients, but no impact of the first AP administration route on other functional outcomes was observed at 3 years of follow-up. Key pointsLong-acting injectable antipsychotics seem promising to avoid extreme residential instability in early psychosis.Global assessment of functioning (GAF) improved in all groups.There was no significant association between the first route of administration and global functionning.

Preliminary evidence supporting the practice of psychosis-risk screening within an inpatient psychiatric setting serving adolescents

Evidence supports the use of brief psychosis-spectrum screening measures to identify individuals at elevated risk for psychosis, however, there is limited research on psychosis-spectrum screening among adolescents hospitalized for acute mental health concerns. Given the psychiatric vulnerability of this population, screening efforts within inpatient settings may help identify adolescents at greatest risk for ongoing mental health concerns including psychosis. This study investigates the use of two brief screening tools to identify psychosis-spectrum symptoms in psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents. Upon intake, adolescents completed two screening measures, the PRIME Screen-Revised and the Youth Self-Report Thought Problems scale, followed by a brief interview to evaluate psychosis-spectrum diagnoses. Associations between screening scores and diagnostic status were explored to evaluate the use of these tools to identify psychosis-spectrum conditions in this population. The sample included 57 adolescents, 28 of whom met psychosis-spectrum criteria. Psychosis-spectrum status was strongly correlated with PRIME scores (r = 0.59) and Thought Problems T scores (r = 0.55). Logistic regression analyses indicated that both screening measures demonstrate promising accuracy (74-81%) for identifying adolescents meeting psychosis-spectrum criteria. The PRIME and Thought Problems scale may be appropriate screening tools for use in adolescent inpatient settings to identify those experiencing clinically significant psychosis-spectrum symptoms.

High level of expressed emotions in the family of people with schizophrenia: has a covert abrasive behaviours component been overlooked?

BACKGROUND

High expressed emotion (EE) in a patient's family is a known risk factor of relapse in schizophrenia. The three components of high EE - criticism, hostility and emotional over-involvement - were developed through a data-driven approach and a focus on overt abrasive behaviours. The influence of covert abrasive behaviours has not been explored.

AIMS AND METHODS

This study aims to explore both overt and covert abrasive behaviours through semi-structured interviews conducted with 22 people with schizophrenia, who were recruited through iterative purposive sampling.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis suggests that participants' experiences of overt abrasive behaviours resonate with the three-factor structure of high EE, except "emotional over-involvement" is renamed to "over-involvement" to focus on behaviours and embrace different levels or types of emotional reactions. Regarding covert abrasive behaviours, two domains are proposed: disassociation and apathy, which focus on family members' disengaging actions and indifferent attitudes respectively. While both overt and covert abrasive behaviours cause psychological distresses and behavioural reactions on the participants, their precise impacts are not entirely the same.

CONCLUSION

People with schizophrenia experience both overt and covert abrasive behaviours with family members. The findings of this study may expand the conceptualization of high EE, enhance its content validity, and provide an extended conceptual framework for developing more comprehensive measures.

Do cognitive and neuropsychological functioning deficits coincide with hippocampal alteration during first-psychotic episode?

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies shown that structural hippocampal alterations are present in subjects at high risk of developing psychosis or schizophrenia. These findings indicate that in a subset of patients undergoing first-psychosis episode (FPE), hippocampal volume alterations are accompanied by associated cognitive and neuropsychological deficits. The combination of psychological deficits and neuroanatomical alterations, in turn, appears to increase treatment complexity and worsen clinical outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to determine whether cognitive and neuropsychological functioning deficits precede or follow hippocampal alterations during early onset psychosis.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study describes 3 case-studies of adolescent subjects, ages 16-17, admitted at the child and adolescent inpatient psychiatric unit in lieu of first psychotic episode. We conducted detailed structured clinical psychiatric interviews, anatomical-structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), sleep-deprived electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings, laboratory testing, and a comprehensive battery of psychological testing to better understand their clinical pictures.

RESULTS

Psychological testing in each patient demonstrated the presence of low to borderline intellectual functioning coupled with neuropsychological deficits in different psychiatric domains. Interestingly, these changes coincided with structural MRI alterations in the hippocampal area.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case report adds to the armamentarium of literature signifying that radiologically detectable alterations of the hippocampus may occur either concomitantly or closely following the development of early cognitive deficits in patients with FPE.

New developments in diagnosis and treatment update: Schizophrenia/first episode psychosis in children and adolescents

Childhood onset schizophrenia (COS) is diagnosed before the age of 13 years, and early onset schizophrenia (EOS) is diagnosed before the age of 18 years. EOS is considered extremely rare and its prevalence in comparison to the worldwide prevalence of schizophrenia (1%) has not adequately been studied. Patients who experience the first episode of psychosis need to be treated early and optimally to lessen the morbidity and improve the outcome of the illness. Treatment needs to be a combination of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities. Pharmacological intervention is necessary for remission, improvement of positive symptoms and to aid with the efficacy of psychosocial interventions. There is a lack of efficacy and safety data of the use of antipsychotic medication in children, with most of the information available being extrapolations of adult data. An increased use of atypical antipsychotic drugs in the treatment of EOS has been accompanied by growing concern about the appropriate use and associated side effects in children and adolescents. This update highlights new developments, concepts and treatment trends in EOS.

A review on schizophrenia and relapse--a quest for user-friendly psychopharmacotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Schizophrenia in general is notoriously associated with relapses rendering the illness progressive to worse outcomes, a concept of which is compatible with neurotoxicity. Therefore, relapse prevention is of utmost clinical relevance.

METHODS

In this review, we aim to put relapse into clinical context in the realm of natural history of, or heterogeneity in, schizophrenia and summarize risk factors of relapse. We discuss how to effectively 'define' relapse in schizophrenia and recent meta-analytic studies on this topic to highlight the importance of continuous antipsychotic treatment.

RESULTS

The following issues emerged: 'How low maintenance antipsychotic dosage could be?’, 'How extended dosing could be?’, 'Who could be successfully withdrawn from antipsychotics?’ and 'How relapse could be defined in the first place?’ The question in particular is how better to deliver antipsychotics at the lowest possible, whereby dose and dosing interval are relevant. While ongoing antipsychotic treatment is the rule, recent works are pointing to a possibility of lower dosage in the maintenance phase of the illness.

CONCLUSIONS

Bearing in mind that suboptimal adherence and withdrawal from antipsychotics are an established and unequivocal risk factor for relapse, further investigations are certainly needed to explore user-friendly manner of psychopharmacotherapy to prevent relapse in schizophrenia.

Rates and predictors of remission in first-episode schizophrenia within 1 year of antipsychotic maintenance treatment. Results of a randomized controlled trial within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia

OBJECTIVE

Full and sustained symptom remission is a major treatment objective after a first-episode in schizophrenia. Findings regarding differences in remission between first- and second-generation antipsychotics are inconclusive. This study aimed to provide rates and predictors of remission in first-episode schizophrenia and to identify symptoms that prevent remission.

METHODS

Prevalence rates of "symptomatic remission" (symptom criteria only) and "enduring remission" (symptom and 6-month time criteria), defined according to Andreasen et al. (2005), were determined in first-episode patients participating in a RCT by the German Research Network on Schizophrenia (GRNS) that compared post-acute, 1-year maintenance treatment with risperidone or haloperidol. Respective predictors at baseline were identified by logistic and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Prevalence rates were 91.5% for symptomatic remission (n=152/166 eligible patients) and 58.6% for enduring remission (n=65 of 111 patients who continued for at least 6 months; 39.2% of all 166 patients included), with no significant differences between risperidone and haloperidol in either type of remission. Enduring remission often was not reached because of negative symptoms: After 6 months, 40.5% of the patients had at least 1 negative symptom, whereas only 10.8% of the patients had "persisting" positive symptoms. Of the different predictors identified in univariate analyses, (lower) negative symptoms and participating in standardized psychological treatment remained significant in multivariate (stepwise forward) analyses for enduring remission.

CONCLUSIONS

By far most of the first-episode patients reached a temporary state of full symptomatic remission within 1 year of antipsychotic treatment. However, only about 50% achieved sustained, enduring remission. Negative symptoms are still a major treatment obstacle to enduring remission in schizophrenia.

Neurocognition: clinical and functional outcomes in schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is characterized by significant heterogeneity in outcome. The last decades have witnessed a significant interest in identifying factors that can moderate or influence clinical and functional outcomes in people with schizophrenia. One factor of particular interest is neurocognition, as performance on various measures of cognitive abilities, such as memory, attention, and executive functions, have been consistently related to functional outcome and, to a lesser extent, clinical outcome. This review aims to provide an up-to-date description of recent studies examining the association between neurocognition and clinical and (or) functional outcomes. In the first section, studies examining neurocognitive performance in relation to clinical outcome are examined. When clinical outcome is defined dichotomously (for example, comparing remitted and nonremitted), verbal memory performance consistently exhibits a strong association with clinical status, with the poor outcome group showing the largest deficits. In the second section, studies exploring the relation between neurocognition and various dimensions of functional outcome are reviewed. These dimensions include independent living, social functioning, and vocational functioning, among others. Again, a strong link between neurocognitive deficits and impairments in several aspects of functioning clearly emerges from this review. Finally, several measurement issues are discussed that pertain to the need to standardize definitions of clinical and (or) functional outcomes, the importance of defining cognitive domains consistently across studies, and distinguishing between one's competence to perform tasks and what one actually does in everyday life. Addressing these measurement issues will be key to studies examining the development of effective interventions targeting neurocognitive functions and their impact on clinical and functional outcomes.

Predicting 1-year risk for relapse in patients who have discontinued or continued quetiapine after remission from first-episode psychosis

OBJECTIVE

Relapse is common among patients with psychotic disorders. Identification of relapse predictors is important for decision regarding maintenance medication. Naturalistic studies often identify medication non-adherence as a dominant predictor. There are relatively few studies for predictors where adherence is already known. It is this situation i.e., discontinuation of medication that predictors will be most useful. We identify predictors for relapse in situations of (i) discontinuation and (ii) continuation of maintenance medication.

METHOD

Analysis of relapse predictors is based on a randomized controlled study (n=178) comparing relapse rates between patients who discontinued or continued medication for at least 1 year following first-episode psychosis. Demographic, clinical and neurocognitive variables were assessed at baseline as predictors of relapse within 1 year.

RESULTS

Risk of relapse was 79% in the discontinuation group and 41% in the maintenance group. Predictors in the discontinuation group were diagnosis of schizophrenia, poorer semantic fluency performance, and higher blink rate. Predictors in the continuation group were disinhibition soft signs and more general psychopathology symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Different predictors of relapse were identified for first episode psychosis patients who discontinued and continued maintenance medication. Neurocognitive dysfunctions are important predictors for both groups. While signs of frontal dysfunction and dopamine hyperactivity predict relapse in the discontinuation group, sign of cognitive disinhibition predicts relapse in the continuation group.

Off-licence prescribing and regulation in psychiatry: current challenges require a new model of governance

The growing worldwide use of pharmaceuticals is managed in some countries by a regulatory system which sharply divides legal use into licensed and unlicensed categories. We examine how for the range of psychotropics this simultaneously restricts the possible benefits to patients, prescribers and producers in some domains, while failing to manage the risks in others. A more flexible system, which shares at an earlier stage experience and evidence on benefits and risks in patients, previously marginalized on the grounds of age, diagnosis or comorbidity, would aid the development of safer, more effective 'real-world prescribing'. Practical recommendations are made for a new model of research and prescribing governance, to enable more effective repurposing of these treatments.

Atypical antipsychotics do not reverse prepulse inhibition deficits in acutely psychotic schizophrenia

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of atypical antipsychotics on prepulse inhibition, startle response and habituation in acutely psychotic patients with schizophrenia, and investigate whether prepulse inhibition deficit improvements are a result of the direct impact of atypical antipsychotics or improvements in antipsychotic-related symptoms.

METHODS

Prepulse inhibition, habituation and acoustic startle response were evaluated in healthy control subjects and patients with schizophrenia (either unmedicated with antipsychotics at the time of hospitalization or medicated with atypical antipsychotics for ≥1 month before hospitalization).

RESULTS

Data were analysed for 26 patients in the unmedicated group, 20 patients in the medicated group and 31 control subjects. Compared with controls, both medicated and unmedicated patients showed prepulse inhibition deficits; however, there were no significant differences between the two patient groups. Lower prepulse inhibition levels were correlated with higher levels of positive, negative, general and total scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that effects of atypical antipsychotics on prepulse inhibition may not be evident when patients with schizophrenia are acutely symptomatic, and do not directly influence prepulse inhibition.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: update 2012 on the long-term treatment of schizophrenia and management of antipsychotic-induced side effects

Abstract These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia published in 2006. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful. They are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F) and five levels of recommendation (1-5) ( Bandelow et al. 2008a ,b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242, see Table 1 ). This second part of the updated guidelines covers long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication and other pharmacological treatment options) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia, part 1: update 2012 on the acute treatment of schizophrenia and the management of treatment resistance

These updated guidelines are based on a first edition of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Schizophrenia published in 2005. For this 2012 revision, all available publications pertaining to the biological treatment of schizophrenia were reviewed systematically to allow for an evidence-based update. These guidelines provide evidence-based practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful and these guidelines are intended to be used by all physicians diagnosing and treating people suffering from schizophrenia. Based on the first version of these guidelines, a systematic review of the MEDLINE/PUBMED database and the Cochrane Library, in addition to data extraction from national treatment guidelines, has been performed for this update. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F; Bandelow et al. 2008b, World J Biol Psychiatry 9:242). This first part of the updated guidelines covers the general descriptions of antipsychotics and their side effects, the biological treatment of acute schizophrenia and the management of treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Prediction and prevention of psychosis in youth at clinical high risk

Most individuals with schizophrenia retrospectively report a prodromal period characterized by increasing problems in thinking, feeling, and behaving. However, it is less clear how many individuals who display prodromal symptoms will subsequently develop a psychotic illness. Thus, a precondition for early intervention in psychosis is the accurate detection of those who may be at true risk of developing a psychotic illness. The aim of this article is to review current work addressing prediction and prevention in the prodrome to psychosis. First, we describe research efforts to develop and test operational criteria for prospectively assessing psychosis liability over time. Second, the clinical, functional, and biological features of the prodrome are presented, along with a discussion of the variables most frequently associated with psychosis onset. Next, treatment studies are reviewed. The review concludes with a framework for future early identification and treatment studies.

Patient perspectives on antipsychotic treatments and their association with clinical outcomes

This analysis examined patient-reported attitudes toward antipsychotic medication and the relationship of these attitudes with clinical outcomes and pharmacotherapy adherence. The analysis included three randomized, double-blind studies in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or schizophreniform disorder diagnosed according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition and randomly assigned to treatment with olanzapine 5-20 mg/day or another antipsychotic (haloperidol 2-20 mg/day, risperidone 2-10 mg/day, or ziprasidone 80-160 mg/day). Patient-reported improvements were significantly greater for olanzapine (n = 488) versus other treatments (haloperidol n = 145, risperidone n = 158, or ziprasidone n = 271) on multiple Drug Attitude Inventory items. A positive attitude toward medication reported by patients was significantly associated with greater clinical improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale and lower discontinuation rates. These results suggest that patients' perceptions of treatment benefits are associated with objective clinical measures, including reduction of symptom severity and lower discontinuation rates. Furthermore, olanzapine may be associated with more positive treatment attitudes. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of reasons for treatment adherence from patients' own perspectives.

Maintenance treatment with quetiapine versus discontinuation after one year of treatment in patients with remitted first episode psychosis: randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To study rates of relapse in remitted patients with first episode psychosis who either continued or discontinued antipsychotic drugs after at least one year of maintenance treatment.

DESIGN

12 month randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

SETTING

Early psychosis outpatient clinics in Hong Kong.

PARTICIPANTS

178 patients with first episode psychosis who had received at least one year of antipsychotic drug treatment between September 2003 and July 2006 and had no positive symptoms of psychosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients received either maintenance treatment with quetiapine (400 mg/day) or placebo and were followed up for the next 12 months or until a relapse occurred.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Relapse assessed monthly and defined as re-emergence of psychotic symptoms (delusions, conceptual disorganisation, hallucinations, suspiciousness, and unusual thought content) according to predefined thresholds.

RESULTS

178 patients were randomised (89 to quetiapine and 89 to placebo). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the risk of relapse at 12 months was 41% (95% confidence interval 29% to 53%) for the quetiapine group and 79% (68% to 90%) for the placebo group (P<0.001). Although quetiapine was generally well tolerated, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse or serious adverse events was greater in the quetiapine group (18%; 16/89) than in the placebo group (8%; 7/89) (relative risk 2.29, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 5.28; chi(2)=3.20, df=1; P=0.07).

CONCLUSION

In a group of asymptomatic patients with first episode psychosis and at least one year of previous antipsychotic drug treatment, maintenance treatment with quetiapine compared with placebo resulted in a substantially lower rate of relapse during the following year. Trial registration Clinical trials NCT00334035.

Determination of clozapine in serum of patients with schizophrenia as a measurement of medication compliance

Abstract Although antipsychotic drugs have been effective in reducing symptoms of schizophrenia, issues with adherence to these agents continue to be a barrier to the implementation and delivery of a successful treatment plan. An estimated 25% of patients with schizophrenia are partially adherent or non-adherent within 7-10 days of beginning therapy. There are some ways to evaluate the pharmacotherapy adherence of the patients: evaluation of the disease symptoms and/or the side effects of the drugs, questionnaires to evaluate quality of life, patient attitude toward his (her) drugs and pill counts. Although these methods represent a good option, they are subjective; for example, if the patients lie this leads to false results. Drug monitoring of patients' biological fluids can be a useful tool to evaluate adherence by relating the serum or plasma levels of drugs with pharmacotherapy compliance. The aim of this study was to determine if serum clozapine levels are a suitable method for evaluating patient adherence to clozapine therapy. Clozapine concentration was determined in serum of 26 volunteer patients who were using this drug as pharmacotheraphy for 6 months to 5 years (steady state conditions at 7-10 days of treatment with the drug). The analysis was done for 6 months, with three samples taken for each patient during this time, relating clozapine serum concentration of lower than therapeutic range with pharmacotherapy non-adherence of patients. Moreover, we compared the evaluation of the pharmacotherapy adherence from serum levels of the drug, with the evaluation of the pharmacotherapy adherence from an indirect tool to evaluate symptoms of disease. Twelve patients were found non-adherent by clozapine serum concentration (46.15%), whereas eight patients were found non-adherent using clinician questionnaire (30.76%). After to evaluate some factors (cigarettes, co-medication, inter-individual variability) that could give different results of adherence from evaluation of serum concentrations and from indirect methods, we can conclude that the clozapine serum concentration is a more objective method of evaluating pharmacotherapy adherence of patients receiving this drug.

The graduated recovery intervention program for first episode psychosis: treatment development and preliminary data

The Graduated Recovery Intervention Program (GRIP) is a novel cognitive-behavioral therapy program designed to facilitate functional recovery in people who have experienced an initial episode of psychosis. In this paper, the treatment development process of GRIP is described and data from an open feasibility trial are presented. Findings suggest clinical and psychosocial benefits associated with GRIP, and the treatment was well-received by clients and therapists. The retention rate of 67%, however, suggests the need for protocol modifications to improve engagement. Initial data on the efficacy of GRIP are encouraging, although the study design precludes more robust conclusions at this time.

The Italian guidelines for early intervention in schizophrenia: development and conclusions

AIM

The effectiveness of early intervention in schizophrenia is still under discussion. The guidelines described in the present paper were aimed at contributing to the current debate by providing Italian practitioners, families, patients and health managers with evidence-based information on early intervention. They also examined the diagnostic tools that are currently available for assessing different stages of psychotic disorders.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary panel of experts (the Guidelines Development Group) used a set of key-questions to develop an explicit search strategy to conduct a systematic review of the literature published from January 2000 to June 2006. Trained personnel then selected papers from those yielded by the literature search. The Guidelines Development Group's final recommendations were scaled according to the Italian National Guidelines System grading system.

RESULTS

The evidence available up to the time of the literature search does not allow for recommendation of early intervention targeting prodromal or at-risk patients to prevent progression from the prodromal phase to acute, full-blown psychosis, nor to improve prognosis. Conversely, identification and timely treatment of first-episode psychotic patients through specific early intervention programmes are highly recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian Guidelines on early intervention in schizophrenia are based on a comprehensive assessment of an updated, large-scale body of literature. They draw specific, evidence-based conclusions to assist clinicians and stakeholders in the planning and implementation of appropriate intervention programmes. Further research is needed to ascertain the effectiveness of early intervention in delaying or preventing the conversion to psychosis and improving prognosis in prodromal or at-risk patients. Further investigation is also required for first-episode and critical period patients.

Substance use and abuse in first-episode psychosis: prevalence before and after early intervention

Despite the high prevalence of substance abuse among first-episode psychosis (FEP) populations, few studies examine whether early intervention (EI) improves substance abuse.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the prevalence and pattern of substance use and abuse among an FEP sample over 12 months.

METHODS

All the participants were diagnosed with a first episode of a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. The participants were followed prospectively. The prevalence rates of substance use and abuse from this sample were compared before and after 12 months of EI services and were compared with rates observed in a sample from the general population.

RESULTS

A total of 200 participants (80.0% males; mean age 24 years) entered the study: 183 participants completed all the assessments at baseline, 131 participants completed all the assessments at 12 months. At baseline, the findings showed similar prevalence rates between the FEP sample and the general sample for lifetime cannabis use (60% vs 55%, respectively) and hazardous alcohol use (26% vs 21%) but significantly different prevalence rates for lifetime hallucinogen (29% vs 15%; P < .001) and cocaine use (20% vs 14%; P < .001). At 12 months, the prevalence rates for drug abuse (P < .01), hazardous alcohol use (P < .01), and concurrent drug abuse and hazardous alcohol use (P < .05) were significantly lower than at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Substance use and abuse decreased significantly after 12 months of EI services; EI services may be able to detect and to reduce substance use among FEP patients before it becomes a more serious disorder.

[Prescription practices of antipsychotic medication in early psychosis: a two-year follow-up survey of subjects admitted in two psychiatric hospitals of South-Western France]

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this pharmacoepidemiological study were to describe the antipsychotic medication received during the first admission and over a two-year follow-up in subjects with a first episode of psychosis, and to assess whether the prescriptions in naturalistic conditions were in adequacy with guidelines.

METHOD

All first-admitted patients, less than 50 years old, consecutively hospitalised in 10 acute wards of two psychiatric hospitals serving Bordeaux's catchment area were included over a period of one year, if they presented with at least one overt psychotic symptom during the last month. Information on psychotropic medication received during the first admission was collected in medical records, and that received after the first admission was collected at the end of a two-year follow-up using multiple sources of information.

RESULTS

Of the 86 patients included in the cohort, 53 presented with broadly defined schizophrenia and 33 with psychotic mood disorder. All except two subjects were prescribed at least one neuroleptic drug. Antipsychotic drugs (amisulpride, olanzapine, risperidone, clozapine) were the most frequently prescribed drugs during the first admission and over the two-year follow-up. If sedative neuroleptics were excluded, antipsychotic drugs were the first prescribed neuroleptic drugs in a large proportion (80%) of patients. Although few patients were first prescribed a conventional neuroleptic, the proportion of subjects treated with these drugs increased over the next prescriptions, and one out of three patients was prescribed at least one of these drugs during the follow-up. The mean dose of antipsychotic drugs at first discharge was higher than that recommended in first episode patients (amisulpride 616 mg, olanzapine 13 mg, risperidone 7 mg). Coprescription of neuroleptic drugs, found in one third of patients at all times of assessment, was especially due to coprescription of a sedative neuroleptic to a conventional or an antipsychotic one. Nearly half of the patients did not take any psychotropic medication at the end of the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The main recommendation specifying that the first neuroleptic treatment in subjects with a first episode of psychosis should use antipsychotic drugs instead of conventional neuroleptics was generally respected in this cohort of first-admitted subjects with psychosis. However, conventional neuroleptics were found in first or second rank prescriptions, although they should not be used before at least the third rank. The recommendations that the initial neuroleptic dose should be lower in subjects with a first episode, and that coprescription of neuroleptics should be avoided, were frequently not respected. This study highlights the fact that international guidelines should be better applied in naturalistic conditions, and that clinicians have to be better informed about these recommendations.

Understanding and treating "first-episode" schizophrenia

"First-episode schizophrenia" is a clinical and research term that often is used to emphasize the special issues that arise when working with this patient population. The notion that schizophrenia has an inexorable downhill course or is a deteriorating illness is being challenged by more sophisticated understanding of what happens before the initial episode and new understanding of the interactions between biologic vulnerabilities and specific environmental risk during adolescence and early adulthood, such as marijuana use. While the incidence rate of "first-episode" will make this a relatively small percentage of a usual clinical caseload, it is a critically important time for the future course of the illness. The hope is that proper management during this critical period will favorably influence the long-term trajectory of outcome for this individual patient. A growing body of evidence suggests that certain approaches and interventions are more helpful than others, such as understanding of the overwhelming nature of the experience to patients and families, aiming to achieve a full and broad pharmacologic response to initial antipsychotic therapy, while also being on the lookout for vulnerability and extreme sensitivity to side effects, and to anticipate a high likelihood of premature medication discontinuation. Clinicians and treatment services should try to identify "first-episode" patients in time to be able to anticipate and address these issues.

Long-acting formulations of atypical antipsychotics: time to reconsider when to introduce depot antipsychotics

The current availability of a long-acting injectable formulation of risperidone and the potential future availability of long-acting formulations of other atypical antipsychotics (such as paliperidone) should prompt a reconsideration of at what stage in the treatment of schizophrenia such long-acting agents should be introduced. At present, long-acting formulations, particularly of conventional antipsychotics (depots), are usually reserved for patients with chronic schizophrenia who are at high-risk of noncompliance. Recent and increasing data from other patient groups, such as those with first-episode psychosis, suggest that long-acting risperidone is associated with good efficacy and tolerability leading to high patient acceptance, and treatment continuation rates that are greater than with oral antipsychotics. The benefits of an atypical antipsychotic coupled with the assurance of medication delivery in the form of a long-acting injection imply that these novel formulations should be considered in first-episode patients, for whom optimal outcome is frequently compromised by early treatment discontinuation and poor adherence.

Efficacy and safety of risperidone long-acting injectable in stable psychotic patients previously treated with oral risperidone

This subgroup analysis of symptomatically stable patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders in the StoRMi trial determined the efficacy and tolerability of risperidone long-acting injectable in patients changed from oral risperidone monotherapy. Risperidone long-acting injectable was administered open-label (dosage 25/37.5/50 mg every 2 weeks for 6 months). In total, 568 patients (60% men, mean age 36-40 years) were included and grouped according to pre-trial oral risperidone dosage (56% < or =4 mg; 30% >4 to < or =6 mg; 14% >6 mg). Most patients (71-85% across groups) were diagnosed with schizophrenia. At endpoint, risperidone long-acting injectable dosages partly correlated with the previous oral risperidone dosage. Some patients previously on high dosages of oral risperidone responded well to lower risperidone long-acting injectable dosages. Efficacy significantly improved from baseline to endpoint in all groups; total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale score improved by > or =20% in 39% of all patients. Clinical global impression symptoms, global assessment of function scores, and the SF-36 mental component summary score significantly improved in all groups. Hospitalizations were reduced by 74-80%. Extrapyramidal symptom rating scale scores were significantly better at endpoint (P< or =0.001). These results indicate that further improvement in symptom control can be seen after a change to risperidone long-acting injectable in clinically stable patients previously treated with oral risperidone.

Switching to risperidone after unsuccessful treatment of olanzapine in the first-episode schizophrenia: an open trial

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of switching to risperidone in the treatment of first-episode schizophrenia who had failed to respond to an initial-prescribed antipsychotic, olanzapine. Fifty-one patients with first-episode schizophrenia after unsuccessful treatment of olanzapine (the mean (S.D.) dosage: 16.4 (4.4) mg/day) were included in this switching study. Of the 51 patients, 43 (84.3%) completed the full 12-week trial and 8 (15.7%) dropped out. The mean dosage of risperidone at the endpoint (last observation) was 3.1 (2.0) mg/day. The total scores of Brief Psychiatric Rating Scales (BPRS) were significantly reduced from baseline to endpoint, especially in the positive and excitement factors (p<0.001). Responder rate (at least 20% decrease in BPRS total score plus final Clinical Global Impression score of 3 or less) was 35.3%. These findings indicate that the switching to risperidone could be one of the useful treatment options in this population.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, part 2: long-term treatment of schizophrenia

These guidelines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This second part of the guidelines covers the long-term treatment as well as the management of relevant side effects. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Pattern of health service utilization and predictors of readmission after a first admission for psychosis: a 2-year follow-up study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the pattern of health service utilization over 2 years following a first admission for psychosis and the baseline characteristics predicting readmission.

METHOD

Patients included in a cohort of first-admitted subjects with psychosis (n = 84) were assessed at the end of a 2-year follow-up using multiple sources of information.

RESULTS

At the end of the follow-up, one of three subjects had no contact with any mental health professional, and 38% of subjects had no contact with a psychiatrist. Half of the patients were readmitted over the 2-year follow-up. The baseline characteristics independently predicting psychiatric readmission were a high number of helping contacts before first admission and persistence of psychotic symptoms at discharge.

CONCLUSION

Decreasing the frequency of readmission in the early course of psychosis is a public health priority. Development of psychotherapeutic programs for subjects with early psychosis who have enduring psychotic symptoms at first discharge should be promoted.

World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of schizophrenia, Part 1: acute treatment of schizophrenia

These guide lines for the biological treatment of schizophrenia were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBO). The goal during the development of these guidelines was to review systematically all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of schizophrenia, and to reach a consensus on a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating people with schizophrenia. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for schizophrenia, as well as from meta-analyses, reviews and randomised clinical trials on the efficacy of pharmacological and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and then categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of schizophrenia, as well as the management of the acute phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antipsychotic medication, other pharmacological treatment options, electroconvulsive therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of adults suffering from schizophrenia.

Olanzapine: a critical review of recent literature

The purpose of this review is to critically review the current literature on olanzapine with an emphasis on emergent themes and key findings in the use of this agent for the treatment of mood disorders and schizophrenia. New information continues to emerge on the impact of olanzapine on schizophrenia and on aspects of the course of mood disorders. There are also continued efforts to understand, predict and manage the side-effect risk with olanzapine.

Patients in the early phases of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders effectively treated with risperidone long-acting injectable

The efficacy and safety of risperidone long-acting injectable (RLAI) was investigated in patients in the early phases of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders (< or = 3 years). Patients who required a treatment change received RLAI (2-weekly gluteal injections of 25, 37.5 or 50 mg, per clinical judgement), without an oral risperidone run-in phase.A total of 382 patients were included in this 6-month open-label study; 73% of patients completed the study. A total of 84% had schizophrenia with a median duration of 1.0 year since diagnosis. Previous medications were mainly atypical antipsychotics (70%) and depot neuroleptics (24%). The main reasons for treatment change were non-compliance (42%) and insufficient efficacy (31%) of previous medication. The total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and all its subscale scores improved significantly (p < or = 0.0001), with 40% of patients showing a 20% improvement on total PANSS. Global Assessment of Functioning, quality of life, patient satisfaction and movement disorders also improved significantly. Tolerability of RLAI was generally good and no unexpected adverse events were reported. The ensured delivery of medication with RLAI resulted in significant symptom improvement in this patient population. Direct initiation of RLAI is well accepted by patients. RLAI might represent a novel option for patients in the early phases of psychosis.

Psychopathology and treatment responsiveness of patients with first-episode schizophrenia

One hundred and four male patients hospitalized for the first time with the diagnosis of first-episode schizophrenia were comprehensively assessed on admission and discharge. Psychopathology, treatment response, and remission rates were evaluated (based on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), severity of symptoms only). On admission, the most frequently observed symptoms were lack of judgment and insight (87.6%), suspiciousness/feelings of persecution (82.3%), delusions (77%), poor attention (70%), disturbance of volition (65.4%), conceptual disorganization (64.7%), and active social avoidance (64%). Except for delusions and hallucinations, the positive items of the PANSS correlated significantly with negative symptoms, and conceptual disorganization correlated with the greatest number of negative symptoms. Individual negative symptoms were present in about half the patients. At discharge, the most frequent symptoms were again lack of judgment and insight (in 55.7%), and for negative symptoms they were blunted affect (22.1%), emotional withdrawal (21.2%), and passive/apathetic social withdrawal (19.5%). The positive symptoms of suspiciousness/feelings of persecution and grandiosity persisted in 20.6% of patients. On average, all symptoms were significantly reduced 44 days after admission. The negative symptoms improved less, compared with the positive ones. At discharge there was a high rate of responders (response defined as minimal 30% reduction of total PANSS): 73% and 74% of patients fulfilled the criteria for remission. On admission, the responders (n = 76) had significantly higher scores of most symptoms, both positive and negative ones than nonresponders (n = 28).

The treatment of schizophrenia: from premorbid manifestations to the first episode of psychosis

To achieve the best therapeutic results in schizophrenia--like most other disorders--primary prevention is preferable to early and prompt treatment, which, in turn, is preferable to treatment of chronically established illness. Unfortunately, there currently exist no accurate markers that can provide information regarding the future course of illness and guide treatment in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic individuals. Therefore, most treatment efforts are currently focused on patients who have already experienced their first psychotic episode. This paper reviews the efforts to identify accurate markers heralding psychotic illness, as well as treatment considerations in the early phase of the disease.

Maximizing function after first-episode psychosis

Interest in early and preventive interventions in patients with psychotic disorders has increased over the past few years as a result of the intuitive appeal of such interventions. Results of studies point to an association between longer duration of untreated psychosis and poor outcome, atypical antipsychotic agents less likely to cause extrapyramidal side effects, and a shift from hospital to community-based care for many patients with severe mental illness. Treatment strategies specifically directed to first-episode psychosis may help to improve outcomes. Such strategies include the use of lower doses of antipsychotic medications, the predominant use of atypical antipsychotic agents, and the deployment of psychological interventions that address the unique needs of young, first-episode patients and their families.