A pharmacoeconomic comparison of antithymocyte globulin and muromonab CD3 induction therapy in renal transplant recipients

Tailored Rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin Induction Dosing for Kidney Transplantation

Background

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) is the most widely used kidney transplant induction immunotherapy in the United States. It was recently Food and Drug Administration approved for this indication with typical dose recommendations of 1.5 mg/kg for up to 7 days given via a central line.

Methods

We theorized that reduced rATG dosing when compared with conventional dosing (6-10.5 mg/kg) is safe and effective, leading to development of a risk-stratified treatment protocol. Five-year data from a retrospective cohort of 224 adult kidney transplants (2008-2013) with follow-up through 2015 is presented. Cumulative rATG doses of 3 mg/kg were administered peripherally to nonsensitized living donor recipients, 4.5 mg/kg to nonsensitized deceased donor recipients. A subset of higher immunologic risk recipients (defined as history of prior transplant, panel reactive antibody greater than 20%, or flow cytometry crossmatch positivity) received 6 mg/kg.

Results

There were no differences in patient or graft survival between the 3 groups. One-year rejection rates in the first 2 groups were 8.3% and 8.8%, respectively, comparable to contemporaneous rates reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Dose tailoring permitted substantial cost savings estimated at US $1 091 502. Mean length of stay fell by almost 3 days as the protocol was refined. There were no episodes of phlebitis. Infection rates were comparable with those reported to the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

Conclusions

The novel findings of the current study include peripheral administration, reduced dosing, favorable safety, excellent allograft outcomes, and clear associative data regarding reduced costs and length of stay.

Update on Pharmacoeconomics in Transplantation

Purpose

To provide current information on pharmacoeconomic outcomes in transplantation for the past 6 years.

Methods

An extensive literature search was undertaken using PubMed and other authenticated Internet sources. Key words used to elicit pertinent studies were “pharmacoeconomics,” “transplantation,” “cost-effectiveness,” “cost-benefit,” “cost-minimization” and “cost-utility” analyses. Studies included in the review contain updated pharmacoeconomic data generated during the past 6 years on economic, clinical, and humanistic outcomes. These data are used to describe and analyze the cost of drug therapy used in transplantation.

Results

Background information is included in the review to provide a context from which to evaluate new study material. Data extracted from the studies include significant findings and study limitations. Data were stratified into understanding pharmacoeconomic methods and their application to transplantation, maintenance and induction therapies, and management of and costs associated with adverse events and quality-of-life issues.

Conclusions

Continued evolution of pharmacoeconomic analysis is needed so that optimal care can be provided in the most cost-effective manner. Pharmacoeconomic study, done rationally and logically, is an indispensable tool in determining optimal transplantation regimens.

Cost-minimization study comparing Simulect vs. Thymoglobulin in renal transplant induction

PURPOSE

Based on the data of clinical trial CHI-F-02 comparing the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (Simulect) vs. anti-thymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin) in renal transplant induction, we carried out an economic evaluation.

METHOD

This pharmacoeconomic study was a cost-minimization study, i.e. given the equivalent efficacy of the products, the strategy that minimized the cost of care was considered better. The cost of care was analyzed from the hospital perspective.

MATERIAL

This 'piggyback' study of 100 patients estimated the direct medical costs incurred over 6 months of use of two strategies for renal transplant induction therapy. Direct medical costs are those of utilized medical resources: medications, hospital stays, dialysis, and physician visits and investigations not scheduled in the protocol.

RESULTS

In the Simulect arm, significant reductions were found in the initial hospital stay duration and number of infectious episodes. Therefore, although the average cost of treatment was slightly higher with Simulect) than with Thymoglobulin (2964 vs. 2298 Euros), the cost of the initial hospitalization was significantly lower in the Simulect arm (10 907 vs. 11 967 Euros; p = 0.02). Furthermore the mean cost of infectious episodes was significantly lower in the Simulect arm (1056 vs. 1790 Euros, p = 0.03). Cytomegalovirus infection accounted for a significantly smaller proportion of this cost in the Simulect arm than in the Thymoglobulin arm (30% vs. 53%, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study showed direct medical cost savings of 1159 Euros per patient in the Simulect arm, which more than compensated for the higher price of this immunosuppressive drug.

A prospective economic evaluation of basiliximab (Simulect) therapy following renal transplantation

BACKGROUND

Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect), an anti-interleukin-2-receptor (anti-IL-2R; CD25) chimeric monoclonal antibody, has been demonstrated to significantly reduce the incidence of acute cellular rejection in adult renal allograft recipients (32% vs. placebo, p < 0.01).

METHODS

An economic evaluation was conducted as part of a U.S. multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing basiliximab plus dual immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine modified [Neoral] and corticosteroids) to dual therapy alone. Healthcare resources utilized by the 346 subjects in the 'intent-to-treat' population were prospectively collected over the 1-yr study period. Direct medical costs were determined for all hospitalizations, outpatient provider visits, procedures (excluding the initial transplant procedure), laboratory and diagnostic tests, and immunosuppressants, including basiliximab when administered.

RESULTS

Total first-year medical costs were lower for the basiliximab group than for the placebo group ($28 927 vs. $32 300, difference = $3373). although this difference was not statistically significant. First-year hospital costs for treating acute rejection were also lower for the basiliximab group ($9328 vs. $10761, difference = $1433); however, this difference did not achieve statistical significance. Importantly, the efficacy analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of acute rejection (38 vs. 55%, p < 0.01) in the basiliximab arm, and this was accomplished without increasing the overall cost of care. Fewer basiliximab-treated patients (8 vs. 15%,, p = 0.03) were hospitalized. This observation suggested less serious illness and reduced treatment costs among basiliximab-treated patients, because the overall incidence of infection was similar between the groups. The adverse event profile of patients receiving basiliximab was clinically and economically indistinguishable from that of those treated with placebo.

CONCLUSION

Induction immunosuppression with basiliximab, combined with cyclosporine modified and corticosteroids, was therapeutically beneficial and contained medical costs during the initial post-transplant year.

Economics of the antithymocyte globulins Thymoglobulin and Atgam in the treatment of acute renal transplant rejection

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the economic implications for transplant centres, Medicare and society of treatment of corticosteroid-resistant Banff Grades I, II and III acute kidney transplant rejection with the antithymocyte globulins Thymoglobulin or Atgam.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a cost analysis of a randomised double-blind multicentre clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of Thymoglobulin and Atgam that was performed at 25 centres in the US in 1994 to 1996.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

The study enrolled 163 patients, 82 in the Thymoglobulin arm and 81 in the Atgam arm.

METHODS

Estimates of the cost of care from the initiation of rejection therapy to 90 days post-therapy were derived from various publicly available sources and applied to patient-specific clinical events documented in the clinical trial. Patients received either intravenous Thymoglobulin (1.5 mg/kg/day) for an average of 10 days or intravenous Atgam (15 mg/kg/day) for an average of 9.7 days.

RESULTS

On average, Thymoglobulin provided significant cost savings compared with Atgam from the perspective of society [$US5977 (1996 values); 95% confidence interval (CI) $US3719 to $US8254], Medicare ($US4967; 95% CI $US3256 to $US6678) and the transplant centre ($US3087; 95% CI $US1512 to $US4667). The overall advantage attributable to Thymoglobulin was primarily due to savings from fewer recurrent rejection treatments and less frequent return to dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of acute renal transplant rejection with Thymoglobulin is a cost saving strategy when compared with treatment with Atgam.

A randomized, double-blinded comparison of Thymoglobulin versus Atgam for induction immunosuppressive therapy in adult renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of Thymoglobulin (a rabbit-derived polyclonal antibody) to Atgam (a horse-derived polyclonal antibody) for induction in adult renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Transplant recipients (n=72) were randomized 2:1 in a double-blinded fashion to receive Thymoglobulin (n=48) at 1.5 mg/kg intravenously or Atgam (n=24) at 15 mg/kg intravenously, intraoperatively, then daily for at least 6 days. Recipients were observed for at least 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

By 1 year after transplantation, 4% of Thymoglobulin-treated patients experienced acute rejection compared with 25% of Atgam-treated patients (P=0.014). The rate of acute rejection was lower with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (relative risk=0.09; P=0.009). Rejection was less severe with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (P=0.02). No recurrent rejection occurred with Thymoglobulin compared with 33% with Atgam (P=NS). Patient survival was not different, but the composite end point of freedom from death, graft loss, or rejection, the "event-free survival," was superior with Thymoglobulin (94%) compared with Atgam (63%; P=0.0005). Fewer adverse events occurred with Thymoglobulin (P=0.013). Leukopenia was more common with Thymoglobulin than Atgam (56% vs. 4%; P<0.0001) during induction. The mean absolute lymphocyte count remained below baseline with Thymoglobulin throughout the study (P<0.007), but with Atgam, significant lymphocyte reductions occurred only at day 7. The incidence of cytomegalovirus disease was less with Thymoglobulin than Atgam at 6 months (10% vs. 33%; P=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Brief (7-day) induction with Thymoglobulin resulted in less frequent and less severe rejection, a better event-free survival, less cytomegalovirus disease, fewer serious adverse events, but more frequent early leukopenia than induction with Atgam. These results may in fact be explained by a more profound and durable beneficial lymphopenia.