Flavor and taste of lansoprazole strawberry-flavored delayed-release oral suspension preferred over ranitidine peppermint-flavored oral syrup: in children aged between 5-11 years

Methodology Used to Assess Acceptability of Oral Pediatric Medicines: A Systematic Literature Search and Narrative Review

BACKGROUND

Regulatory guidelines require that any new medicine designed for a pediatric population must be demonstrated as being acceptable to that population. There is currently no guidance on how to conduct or report on acceptability testing.

AIM

Our objective was to undertake a review of the methods used to assess the acceptability of medicines within a pediatric population and use this review to propose the most appropriate methodology.

METHODS

We used a defined search strategy to identify literature reports of acceptability assessments of medicines conducted within pediatric populations and extracted information about the tools used in these studies for comparison across studies.

RESULTS

In total, 61 articles were included in the analysis. Palatability was the most common (54/61) attribute measured when evaluating acceptability. Simple scale methods were most commonly used, with visual analog scales (VAS) and hedonic scales used both separately and in combination in 34 of the 61 studies. Hedonic scales alone were used in 14 studies and VAS alone in just five studies. Other tools included Likert scales; forced choice or preference; surveys or questionnaires; observations of facial expressions during administration, ease of swallowing, or ability to swallow the dosage; prevalence of complaints or refusal to take the medicine; and time taken for a nurse to administer the medicine.

CONCLUSIONS

The best scale in terms of validity, reliability, feasibility, and preference to use when assessing acceptability remains unclear. Further work is required to select the most appropriate method to justify whether a medicine is acceptable to a pediatric population.

Open-label taste-testing study to evaluate the acceptability of both strawberry-flavored and orange-flavored amylmetacresol/2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol throat lozenges in healthy children

Background

Acute sore throat (pharyngitis) is one of the most common illnesses for which children are seen by primary care physicians. Most cases are caused by viruses and are benign and self-limiting. Clinically proven, over-the-counter throat lozenges provide rapid and effective relief of acute sore throat symptoms, and are increasingly important in self-management of this condition.

Objective

The purpose of this study (International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number: ISRCTN34958871) was to evaluate the acceptability of two licensed, commercially available sore throat lozenges containing amylmetacresol and 2,4-dichlorobenzyl (AMC/DCBA)—one strawberry flavored and the other orange flavored—in healthy children.

Study design

This was an open-label, single-dose, crossover, taste-testing study in children recruited via a clinical database and advertisements over a 3.5-week period.

Setting

Potentially eligible participants were invited to attend the taste-testing session at a clinic.

Participants

At the screening session, which took place either before or on the day of taste testing, details of relevant medical history, medication, and demographics were recorded. Of the 108 screened subjects, 102 were recruited. These were healthy male and female children aged 6–12 years.

Intervention

Each child cleansed their palate with water and water biscuits before tasting a strawberry-flavored lozenge (Strepsils^® strawberry sugar free, Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare Limited, Nottingham, UK; PL 00063/0395), which was sucked for 1 minute and then expelled. The orange-flavored lozenge (Strepsils^® orange with vitamin C, Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare Limited, Nottingham, UK; PL 016242152) was tasted at least 15 minutes later following further cleansing of the palate. The spontaneous reaction of the child on tasting each lozenge was observed and recorded. Subjects were asked to indicate their liking for each lozenge, using a 7-point hedonic facial scale, and were required to answer a series of questions relating to what they liked and disliked about the taste and the feel of the lozenge in the mouth and throat. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with a hedonic facial score of >4. Secondary endpoints included the spontaneous reaction of the child on tasting the lozenge and responses to questions related to taste.

Results

The taste of the lozenge was scored >4 (i.e. ‘good’, ‘really good’, or ‘super good’) by 85.3 % of subjects for the strawberry flavor and 49.0 % for the orange flavor (p < 0.0001). The mean (standard deviation) score was 5.72 (1) for the strawberry-flavored lozenge and 4.35 (2) for the orange-flavored lozenge. The proportion of subjects willing to take the lozenge again was 94 % for the strawberry flavor and 56 % for the orange flavor.

Conclusions

Strawberry-flavored AMC/DCBA lozenges were liked by, and acceptable to, the majority of the children. AMC/DCBA orange-flavored lozenges were also liked by, and acceptable to, approximately half the children. Overall, both strawberry and orange would be suitable flavors for lozenges intended for children when they suffer from sore throat.

A prospective study to assess the palatability of analgesic medicines in children

AIM

This study examined children's opinions on the taste of three analgesic medicines: paracetamol, ibuprofen and codeine.

BACKGROUND

Many medicines for children are unpleasant and unacceptable. Research has shown that children's taste preferences differ to adults, in whom palatability is often tested. Little British research exists on children's opinions on the palatability of medicines. This study aimed to address this gap in knowledge.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

METHODS

Between May-September 2008, hospital inpatients aged 5-16 years rated the taste of required analgesics on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. This incorporated a 5-point facial hedonic scale. They were also asked their favourite flavour and colour for a medicine.

RESULTS

A total of 159 children took part. Eighty-five males (53·5%) and 74 females (46·5%). The median age was 8 years (Inter-quartile range 6-11). The taste of ibuprofen was significantly preferred to paracetamol or codeine. Significant differences were observed depending if the medicine rated was taken first or second (for example pre-medication with paracetamol and ibuprofen). Younger children (5-8 years) were more likely to choose the extremes of the scale when grading than older children were. Preferred flavours on questioning were strawberry 44% and banana 17%. Favourite colours were pink 25·8% and red 20·8%, with girls more likely to choose pink and boys blue.

CONCLUSION

Ibuprofen was the most palatable analgesic medicine tested. Children reported they preferred fruit flavours and colour was sex dependent. Nurses when administering two medicines together should consider giving the least palatable first, for example paracetamol before ibuprofen for pre-medication.

Assessment of palatability of two sublingual diluents in allergic patients: a prospective pilot study

BACKGROUND

Taste of diluents could have an effect on the ultimate patient compliance and acceptability of allergenic extract formulations used in sublingual allergy immunotherapy. This study assessed the palatability and compared the flavor and taste preferences of two sublingual diluents in allergic adult patients.

METHODS

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded pilot study. Diluents A (50% glycerin and water) and B (0.4% phenol and water) were tested. Three drops were placed in the sublingual area beneath the tongue for 2 minutes before swallowing. A 5-point analog scale was used to allow ranking of the degree of taste acceptance. Patients were then given a 10-minute break where unsalted crackers and bottled water were provided to cleanse the palate between tasting periods. After tasting both samples, patients were asked to answer a final question regarding taste preference.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients, there were 15 men and 15 women with a mean age of 38 years (range, 18 to 61 years). For diluent A, 18 (60.0%) patients graded the diluent as having a “pleasant” taste, 8 (26.7%) patients gave a grade of “very pleasant,” and 4 (13.3%) patients said that they were “not sure.” For diluent B, 16 (53.3%) patients gave a grade of “unpleasant” and only 6 (20.0%) patients gave a grade of “pleasant.” Finally, 28 (93.3%) of the 30 patients chose diluent A over diluent B as the preferred diluent of choice (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Fifty percent glycerin had better taste attributes and phenolated saline induced unpleasant oral sensation on sublingual dosing.

Ranitidine (Zantac) syrup versus Ranitidine effervescent tablets (Zantac) EFFERdose) in children: a single-center taste preference study

BACKGROUND

The histamine H(2) receptor antagonist ranitidine is US FDA-approved for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease and healing of erosive esophagitis in children >or=1 month of age. A low-dose strength of ranitidine is now available in a citrus-flavored 25 mg effervescent tablet (dissolved in 5 mL of water); this formulation was developed to facilitate use in infants and smaller children. Ranitidine syrup is available in a peppermint-flavored 15 mg/mL formulation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare taste preferences for ranitidine (Zantac) syrup and ranitidine effervescent tablets dissolved in water (Zantac EFFERdose) in healthy children aged 4-8 years and their adult caregivers.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

A randomized, single-blind, crossover, taste test trial was conducted in 102 children and 102 parents/legal guardians. All subjects received a single 45 mg dose of each formulation. After tasting both preparations children were asked: "Now that you have tasted both medicines, which one of these medicines do you think tastes better?" Adults were asked four questions to assess whether they would administer the medication to the children.

RESULTS

Seventy-one percent (72/102) of the children preferred the taste of the ranitidine effervescent tablets compared with 29% (30/102) who preferred the syrup (p < 0.001). The majority of adults (71%) responded that they would prefer to administer the effervescent formulation based on taste. Adverse events consistent with product labeling were mild and were reported in four children and three adults: headache (n = 3), drowsiness (n = 1), abdominal pain/cramps (n = 2), and bloating/gas (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

The taste of the ranitidine effervescent formulation dissolved in water is preferred over the ranitidine syrup. Better taste acceptance may facilitate ease of administration and compliance in pediatric patients.

Proton pump inhibitor formulary considerations in the acutely ill. Part 1: Pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, and available formulations

OBJECTIVE

To review important proton pump inhibitor (PPI) pharmacologic, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic principles in acutely ill patients, compare PPI formulation options for patients unable to swallow a tablet or capsule, and provide clinicians with guidance when making hospital formulary decisions with this class of agents.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (1966-May 2005) and the Cochrane Library databases were searched using the key words proton pump inhibitor, acid suppression, peptic ulcer disease, gastrointestinal bleeding, stress ulcer prophylaxis, and critical illness. Bibliographies of cited references were reviewed, and a manual search of abstracts from recent gastroenterology, critical care, and surgery scientific meetings was completed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated, and all information deemed relevant was included for this review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

PPIs have become a mainstay for acute acid suppression in hospitalized patients over other therapeutic options. Various commercially available PPI products are available for administration, either enterally or parenterally, to patients unable to swallow a tablet or capsule. Newer oral PPI formulations offer numerous advantages over older products. The results of studies comparing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of different PPI dosage forms and routes of administration are among the factors to consider when making formulary decisions.

CONCLUSIONS

While the introduction of new PPI products has expanded the therapeutic options for acid suppression in acutely ill patients, a number of unresolved questions remain surrounding the interchangeability of these products, the clinical significance of one PPI formulation over the other, and how oral/enteral PPI therapy should be used as step-down therapy after parenteral PPI therapy.

Taste Comparisons for Lansoprazole Strawberry-Flavoured Delayed-Release Orally Disintegrating Tablet and Ranitidine Peppermint-Flavoured Syrup in Children

OBJECTIVE

To compare the flavour and taste preferences of two acid-inhibitory therapies in children.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

104 (52 male and 52 female) healthy children aged 6-11 years participated in this phase IV single-centre, taste-test study after parental consent was obtained.

METHODS

Children were divided into two groups based upon age: group 1 included children aged 6-8 years and group 2 included children aged 9-11 years. Within each group an equal number of male and female subjects were recruited. Within each of the four strata defined by group and sex, an equal number of subjects were randomised to taste the strawberry-flavoured lansoprazole 15mg orally disintegrating tablet or the ranitidine 75mg/5mL peppermint-flavoured syrup samples in position 1. In group 1, the lansoprazole 15mg delayed-release orally disintegrating tablet was dispersed in 5mL of water, while in group 2, children gently rolled the tablet on the tongue until dissolution, before swallowing the particles. Children given the dose of lansoprazole dispersed in water (group 1) and the ranitidine dose (groups 1 and 2) were to taste it, swish it in their mouth for up to 10 seconds, and then swallow it. Children were given ambient temperature water and unsalted crackers to cleanse the palate during a 10-minute break between tastings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

After each tasting, children rated their degree of liking on a five-point facial hedonic scale (5 = like very much, 1 = dislike very much). Product preference was recorded after the tasting of both samples.

RESULTS

Among group 1 and group 2 participants, 86.5% (45/52) and 90.4% (47/52) of children, respectively, 'liked' ('like a little' or 'like very much') the strawberry-flavoured lansoprazole orally disintegrating tablet. The proportion of children who 'liked' the peppermint-flavoured ranitidine syrup was lower than the proportion who liked lansoprazole, and the proportions were similar between the groups: 13.5% (7/52) in group 1 and 9.6% (5/52) in group 2. Children in both groups preferred the strawberry-flavoured lansoprazole delayed-release orally disintegrating tablet: 92% (95% CI 81.1, 97.8; p < 0.001) of those in group 1 and 98% (95% CI 89.7, 100.0; p < 0.001) of those in group 2.

CONCLUSION

After tasting both products, >92% of children aged from 6-11 years preferred the strawberry-flavoured lansoprazole delayed-release orally disintegrating tablet, either dissolved in a small amount of water or allowed to dissolve on the tongue, over the peppermint-flavoured ranitidine syrup.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole 15- and 30-mg sachets for suspension versus intact capsules

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetic profiles of single doses of lansoprazole 15- and 30-mg sachets for suspension were compared with those of corresponding doses of lansoprazole oral capsules.

METHODS

Healthy adult male and female subjects were randomized (1:1 ratio) into 2 Phase 1, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period complete crossover studies. In the first study, each subject received 1 lansoprazole 15-mg sachet mixed with water and 1 lansoprazole 15-mg oral capsule; in the second study, each subject received 1 lansoprazole 30-mg sachet mixed with water and 1 lansoprazole 30-mg oral capsule. Administration of the 2 formulations was separated by a washout period of > or =7 days. Blood samples were collected before and after each administration to assess the pharmacokinetic parameters of lansoprazole and bioequivalence between suspension and capsule.

RESULTS

Thirty-six subjects (19 males, 17 females) with a mean (SD) age of 32.0 (9.6) years and mean (SD) body weight of 68.6 (10.5) kg received lansoprazole 15 mg. Thirty-six subjects (22 males, 14 females) with a mean (SD) age of 38.0 (8.3) years and mean (SD) body weight of 75.1 (9.7) kg received lansoprazole 30 mg. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the 15- and 30-mg lansoprazole sachets for suspension were similar to those of the corresponding doses of the oral capsules. The mean (SD) values for C(max) and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity) for the lansoprazole 15-mg sachet (591.9 [242.3] ng/mL and 1614 [2065] ng.h/mL, respectively) did not differ significantly from those for the lansoprazole 15-mg capsules (578.6 [275.2] ng/mL and 1620 [2290] ng.h/mL, respectively). These parameters also did not differ significantly between the lansoprazole 30-mg sachet and 30-mg capsule: mean (SD) C(max), 1103 (428.3) and 1077 (465.6) ng/mL, respectively; mean (SD) AUC(0-infinity), 2655 (1338) and 2669 (1311) ng.h/mL, respectively. The 90% Cls for C(max) and AUC(0-infinity) ratios were contained within the 0.80 to 1.25 equivalence range, supporting bioequivalence.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that the 15- and 30-mg lansoprazole sachets for suspension are bioequivalent to the corresponding doses of oral capsules. The sachet for suspension may provide an alternative route of administration to patients who have difficulty swallowing solid oral formulations.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease: could intervention in childhood reduce the risk of later complications?

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a ubiquitous disorder in infants. Whereas infants typically outgrow regurgitation by 1 year of age, the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms in those aged 3 to >18 years ranges from 1.8% to 22%. The pathophysiology of GERD in children is similar to that in adults. However, children may present with gastroesophageal and extraesophageal symptoms distinct from classic heartburn. In addition to a growing awareness of the high prevalence of the disorder, increasing evidence supports GERD being a lifelong condition in some individuals that begins in childhood. Although the diagnostic workup in children compared with adults may differ, studies suggest that the early detection and treatment of GERD in childhood may result in better adult disease outcomes, improved quality of life, and decreased overall healthcare burden. Studies of proton pump inhibitor therapy in children confirm high rates of mucosal healing and GER symptom resolution, even in children whose symptoms did not respond to H2-receptor therapy or fundoplication procedures. Omeprazole, lansoprazole, and esomeprazole are formulated as capsules containing enteric-coated granules that can be sprinkled onto applesauce or other soft foods. Lansoprazole is also formulated as strawberry-flavored granules for suspension. These as well as other alternative dosing formulations expand the ability to administer these agents to children. Moreover, long-term studies in adults and in children demonstrate that these agents are safe and well tolerated, even at the higher milligram per kilogram doses that are often required in pediatric patients because of their greater hepatic metabolic capacity.