Treatment with methotrexate and low-dose corticosteroids in sarcoidosis patients with cardiac lesions

Cardiac sarcoidosis; update for the heart failure specialist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review presents contemporary data on epidemiology, common presentations, investigations and diagnostic algorithms, treatment and prognosis. It particularly focuses on topics of most relevance to heart failure specialists, including what left ventricle (LV) function changes can be expected after treatment and outcomes to all standard and advanced heart failure therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Around 5% of sarcoidosis patients have clinically manifest cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), presenting with significant arrhythmias (such as conduction disturbances and ventricular arrhythmias) or newly developed unexplained heart failure. These cardiac symptoms (including sudden cardiac death) may be the initial manifestations of CS. While cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is the preferred method for identifying fibrosis in the myocardium, FDG-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) helps in identifying active inflammation within the myocardium and aids in managing immunosuppressive treatment. The concept of isolated CS is much debated. However very importantly, recent data have shown that some patients diagnosed with 'clinically and imaging isolated CS' are subsequently found to have genetic cardiomyopathy. The management of CS involves a comprehensive approach including medications for immunosuppression, all standard heart failure medication and, in high-risk patient's implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). In CS patients with terminal heart failure who do not respond to medical and surgical interventions, heart transplantation and ventricular assist devices should be considered. Long-term results after transplantation are generally favorable and comparable to non-CS patients. The degree of left ventricular dysfunction remains a crucial prognostic factor in CS cases. Outcomes for CS have very significantly improved, over the last two decades due to earlier diagnosis, advanced heart failure treatments, and the strategic use of ICD therapy.

SUMMARY

Outcomes for CS have significantly improved, over the last two decades due to earlier diagnosis, advanced heart failure treatments, and the strategic use of ICD therapy.

Steroids Versus Immunomodulators in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review

Granulomatous inflammation of the heart causes arrhythmias, heart block, and heart failure in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), a rare but potentially deadly condition. There is increasing interest in using immunomodulators as steroid-sparing medicines, even though corticosteroids are still the usual treatment. This study compared corticosteroids and immunomodulatory treatments through a systematic review and meta-analysis. After a thorough literature search in October 2024, 11 pertinent studies were found. These included observational studies, case series, and randomized controlled trials. Based on changes in myocardial inflammation (SUVmax) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), the effectiveness of corticosteroids, methotrexate, infliximab, rituximab, and their combinations was evaluated. The analysis revealed that all treatments significantly reduced myocardial inflammation, with methotrexate showing the highest effect size (d = 1.65, p < 0.001). Infliximab in combination with corticosteroids also demonstrated a significant reduction in SUVmax (d = 1.61, p < 0.001). LVEF improved across all treatment groups, although the effect was modest, with infliximab and corticosteroids showing the most significant increase in LVEF (d = 0.4, p = 0.05). The differences between subgroups were not statistically significant (p = 0.46 for SUVmax, p = 0.36 for LVEF). Corticosteroids remain the standard first-line treatment for CS, while methotrexate has shown the highest effect size for reducing myocardial inflammation, supporting its role as a steroid-sparing agent with fewer long-term side effects. Infliximab is effective but carries risk of infection. These findings highlight the need for customized treatment regimens in the management of CS. This study underscores the urgent need for more research to enhance combination medications, pinpoint patient subgroups that may benefit most from specific therapies, and enhance treatment regimens in the field of CS.

Comparison of long-term outcomes in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis treated with different immunosuppressive drugs

BACKGROUND

We compared long-term clinical outcomes between patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) who received no treatment (NT), steroid treatment (ST), disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), or tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors (TNF).

METHODS

Patients from SSM healthcare system's data warehouse were identified using ICD codes. Inclusion criteria included at least 6 months of follow-up. Outcomes studied were heart failure (HF) admissions, ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA), and pacemaker/defibrillator placement. Statistical analysis included multivariate logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

We identified 198, 174, 66, and 19 patients in NT, ST, DMARDs, and TNF groups respectively. Mean age was 62.4, 60.2, 56, and 54.4 respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of medical comorbidities including pulmonary sarcoidosis between the groups. Mean follow up was 92.3 months. Percent incidences of VTA were 17.5, 16.3, 12.5, and 5.6 (P 0.57) in the NT, ST, DMARDs and TNF groups respectively. DMARDs and TNF groups had a lower incidence of HF admission (43.9% and 36.8%) compared to NT and ST (59.1% and 59.2%). In the multivariate model, compared to NT group, the odds ratio for HF admission was 1.08 (CI: 0.70-1.65), 0.64 (0.36-1.14) and 0.45 (0.17-1.20) in the ST, DMARDs and TNF groups respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of pacemaker/defibrillator placement between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study from a large healthcare system, CS patients treated with DMARDs or TNF had a trend for lower incidence of HF admission than those on NT or ST.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: diagnosis and management

Non-caseating granulomatous infiltration of the myocardium is the hallmark of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). CS manifests clinically as conduction disturbance, ventricular arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death and/or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Other than confirmation through endomyocardial biopsy, a diagnosis of probable CS can be established by histological evidence of systemic sarcoidosis in addition to characteristic clinical or advanced imaging findings. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance imaging (CMR) and 18F-flurodeoxyglycose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) are imaging modalities indispensable in the diagnosis and monitoring of CS. FDG-PET is the method of choice for identifying the active inflammatory phase of CS and in the monitoring and modifying of immunosuppressive treatment. CMR is better suited for assessing cardiac morphology and function. Both modalities are more effective in detecting CS when used in combination than either is alone. Management of CS is primarily based upon observational data of low quality due to a paucity of randomized controlled trials. Corticosteroid therapy and/or tiered-immunosuppression are the mainstays of treatment in reducing myocardial inflammation. Steroid-sparing agents aim to limit the unfavorable side-effects of a significant steroid burden. Antiarrhythmics and guideline-directed medical therapies are utilized for control of ventricular arrhythmia and left ventricular dysfunction respectively. CS necessitates multidisciplinary care in specialized centers to most effectively diagnose and manage the disease. Additional randomized trials are warranted to further our understanding of medical optimization in CS.

Management of cardiac sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a form of inflammatory cardiomyopathy associated with significant clinical complications such as high-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure as well as sudden cardiac death. It is therefore important to provide an expert consensus statement summarizing the role of different available diagnostic tools and emphasizing the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. By integrating clinical information and the results of diagnostic tests, an accurate, validated, and timely diagnosis can be made, while alternative diagnoses can be reasonably excluded. This clinical expert consensus statement reviews the evidence on the management of different CS manifestations and provides advice to practicing clinicians in the field on the role of immunosuppression and the treatment of cardiac complications based on limited published data and the experience of international CS experts. The monitoring and risk stratification of patients with CS is also covered, while controversies and future research needs are explored.

Cardiac sarcoidosis treated with nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy

Background

Nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy is a potential therapeutic strategy for cardiac sarcoidosis. However, it is not recommended as an established treatment option. This study aimed to demonstrate the clinical outcomes of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis using nonsteroidal immunosuppressants through the ILLUstration of the Management and PrognosIs of JapaNese PATiEnts with Cardiac Sarcoidosis multicenter retrospective registry.

Methods

From a cohort of 512 patients, 426 who received corticosteroid therapy and 26 who received other immunosuppressive therapy were included for analysis. Clinical outcomes included all-cause death, fatal ventricular arrhythmic events (FVAE), and worsening heart failure with hospitalization.

Results

Nonsteroidal immunosuppressants were used for retained fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the heart (n = 14), corticosteroid side effects (n = 7), ventricular arrhythmia (n = 4), complete atrioventricular block (n = 2), worsened extracardiac sarcoidosis (n = 2), and other reasons (n = 2). They comprised of methotrexate (n = 20), cyclosporine (n = 2), cyclophosphamide (n = 2), and azathioprine (n = 3). After the addition of a nonsteroidal immunosuppressant, corticosteroids were reduced in 14 of 26 patients (5 [5-17] mg), although no patient discontinued corticosteroids. Of the 14 patients, decreased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was observed in seven at follow-up. Clinical outcomes were observed in 11 patients (42.3 %). Detected events included all-cause death in five patients (19.2 %), FVAE in four (15.4 %), and worsening heart failure with hospitalization in five (19.2 %), with some overlap.

Conclusions

Nonsteroidal immunosuppressive therapy may be a possible treatment option for patients who are not stabilized with corticosteroids alone or develop corticosteroid side effects.

Immunomodulating and Immunosuppressive Therapy for Virus-Negative Immune-Mediated Myocarditis

Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the myocardium caused by infectious and noninfectious agents. Clinical manifestations range from mildly symptomatic forms to acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden death. Myocarditis is still a challenging diagnosis because of its wide variability in clinical presentation and unpredictable course. Moreover, a standardized, specific treatment in not yet available. Immunosuppressive treatment for virus-negative lymphocytic myocarditis is still controversial. Conversely, immunosuppression is well established in sarcoidosis, eosinophilic, giant-cell, drug hypersensitivity, and trauma-related myocarditis as well as lymphocytic myocarditis associated with connective tissue diseases or with the rejection of a transplanted heart. Recently, immunosuppressive therapy has been also recognized as an effective treatment in virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy. The aim of this review is to underline the role of immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies in patients with immune-mediated myocarditis and illustrate the different treatment strategies depending on the etiology. An endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis as well as for a tailored treatment.

[Therapeutic Pathways in Sarcoidosis. A Position Paper of the German Society of Respiratory Medicine (DGP)]

The present recommendations on the therapy of sarcoidosis of the German Respiratory Society (DGP) was written in 2023 as a German-language supplement and update of the international guidelines of the European Respiratory Society (ERS) from 2021. It contains 5 PICO questions (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) agreed in the consensus process, which are explained in the background text of the four articles: Confirmation of diagnosis and monitoring of the disease under therapy, general therapy recommendations, therapy of cutaneous sarcoidosis, therapy of cardiac sarcoidosis.

Prospective Analysis of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Cardiac Sarcoidosis With Fluorodeoxyglucose Myocardial Accumulation: The PRESTIGE Study

BACKGROUND

Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) can noninvasively assess active inflammatory myocardium in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Prednisolone (PSL) is the initial drug of choice for active CS; however, its efficacy has not been prospectively evaluated. Moreover, there are no alternative systematic treatment strategies.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) in patients refractory to PSL assessed by using cardiac metabolic activity (CMA) in 18F-FDG-PET.

METHODS

A total of 59 patients with active CS were prospectively enrolled. CMA (standardized uptake value × accumulation area) was used as an indicator of active inflammation, and a 6-month regimen of PSL therapy was introduced, followed by a second FDG scan. Poor responders to PSL therapy (CMA reduction rate <70%) and patients with recurrent CS (CMA reduction rate ≥70% after initial PSL therapy but CMA recurred after an additional 6 months of therapy) were randomly assigned to the MTX or repeat PSL (re-PSL) therapy groups for another 6 months.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients completed the initial 6-month PSL therapy regimen. Median CMA reduced from 203.3 to 1.0 (P < 0.001), and 47 patients were allocated to the response group, 9 to the poor response group, and 2 to the recurrent group. Accordingly, 11 patients were randomly assigned to the MTX (n = 5) or re-PSL (n = 6) groups. After 6 months, neither group showed a significant reduction in CMA values. MTX was comparable to re-PSL in reducing CMA.

CONCLUSIONS

The 6-month regimen of PSL was a potent therapeutic tool for active CS. When MTX was added to low-dose PSL in patients refractory to the initial PSL therapy, there was no significant difference compared with re-PSL. Further studies are needed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of MTX for active CS, including how MTX works when it is administered in higher doses or for longer periods.

Novel Approach in Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Case Report Highlighting Abatacept as a Promising Treatment Option

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a rare auto-immune disorder where immune cells form granulomas in the heart that may lead to potential arrhythmias and heart failure. Due to the low prevalence of CS, the management remains challenging, requiring a multidisciplinary approach. In addition to the management of the resulting arrhythmias and heart failure, corticosteroids and immunosuppressants are used as anti-inflammatories to prevent disease progression. Immunosuppressive regimens for the treatment of CS are not yet well established. Abatacept has been approved for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriatic arthritis and both are mainly Th1-driven autoimmune diseases. Even though there are several different drugs used to treat corticosteroid-dependent sarcoidosis, abatacept may represent a unique option as its side effects differ from other drugs like methotrexate, azathioprine, or mycophenolate, especially bone marrow and liver toxicity. We present the case of a 52-year-old CS patient treated with abatacept after the failure of methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil. Our patient had a history of stage D heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with ejection fraction (EF) of 15-20%, nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) s/p left heart catheterization (LHC), CS diagnosed by positron emission tomography (PET), status post implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation, lung sarcoid, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and aflutter, who followed with cardiology, rheumatology, and pulmonology. He had multiple admissions for heart failure exacerbations. The patient was initially diagnosed with pulmonary sarcoidosis after which he completed a small course of steroids. CT chest showed lymphadenopathy; however, endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) did not show evidence of pulmonary sarcoidosis. During an admission for heart failure about four years later, cardiac PET CT showed CS, and rheumatology was brought on board. The patient initially refused steroids and steroid-sparing agents. At subsequent visits, the patient was amenable to medication and was started on methotrexate 10mg weekly. However, given worsening chronic kidney disorder, methotrexate was discontinued and mycophenolate 200mg daily was started. A couple of weeks after mycophenolate was started, the patient felt like "his throat was closing up" and his stomach was cramping, which was thought to be an allergic response to the mycophenolate so it was discontinued. He then received an abatacept infusion which he tolerated well. Currently, our patient has been referred for heart transplantation.

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis has a multitude of manifestations and affects the human body widely. Pulmonary complaints are most common; however, cardiac, optic, and neurologic manifestations carry high mortality and morbidity. Acute presentations in the emergency room can cause life-altering effects if not appropriately diagnosed and treated. Generally, less severe cases of sarcoidosis have a favorable prognosis and can be treated with steroid therapy. Resistant and more severe cases of the disease carry high mortality and morbidity. It is incredibly important to arrange specialty follow-up for these patients when needed. This review focuses on the acute presentations of sarcoidosis.

Prednisone vs methotrexate in treatment naïve cardiac sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

Side effects limit the long-term use of glucocorticoids in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), and methotrexate has gained attention as steroid sparing agent although the supporting evidence is poor. This study compared prednisone monotherapy, methotrexate monotherapy or a combination of both, in the reduction of myocardial Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake and clinical stabilization of CS patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, 61 newly diagnosed and treatment naïve CS patients commenced treatment with prednisone (N = 21), methotrexate (N = 30) or prednisone and methotrexate (N = 10) between January 2010 and December 2017. Primary outcome was metabolic response on FDG PET/CT and secondary outcomes were treatment patterns, major adverse cardiovascular events, left ventricular ejection fraction, biomarkers and side effects. At a median treatment duration of 6.2 [5.7-7.2] months, 71.4% of patients were FDG PET/CT responders, and the overall myocardial maximum standardized uptake value decreased from 6.9 [5.0-10.1] to 3.4 [2.1-4.7] (P < 0.001), with no significant differences between treatment groups. During 24 months of follow-up, 7 patients (33.3%; prednisone), 6 patients (20.0%; methotrexate) and 1 patient (10.0%; combination group) experienced at least one major adverse cardiovascular event (P = 0.292). Left ventricular ejection fraction was preserved in all treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant suppression of cardiac FDG uptake occurred in CS patients after 6 months of prednisone, methotrexate or combination therapy. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes during follow-up. These results warrant further investigation of methotrexate treatment in CS patients.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis Presented With Hiccups: A Case Report and Literature Review

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem disorder of unknown etiology commonly associated with hilar lymphadenopathy and granulomas. Cardiac involvement is less common; however, sarcoidosis is a known cause of restrictive cardiomyopathy. It typically presents as new-onset arrhythmias or heart failure, although cases of sudden cardiac death have been reported. We present a case of a 56-year-old male with a known history of pulmonary sarcoidosis, not on active treatment, who presented to the emergency department with a week of continuous hiccups every few seconds associated with non-exertional dyspnea. An initial computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest showed multiple stellate-like ground-glass opacities and the progression of bronchiectasis. Troponins were negative. On the initial electrocardiogram (EKG), he was found to be in atrial flutter and was admitted to the medical floor. Cardiology was consulted for suspected cardiac sarcoidosis, and they recommended transfer to the tertiary care center for further evaluation. Upon arrival, the patient underwent catheter ablation for atrial flutter and returned to sinus rhythm after the procedure. The initial nuclear scan with gallium was not suggestive of cardiac sarcoidosis. However, subsequent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed cardiac involvement. Due to the high risk of arrhythmias, the patient was scheduled for implantable cardioverter defibrillator placement before discharge. The patient was given oral prednisone. The patient was discharged in stable condition, and interrogation of the device found it well functioning, and no significant arrhythmias were noted. Presentation of cardiac sarcoidosis can be variable, and any should be considered in any patient with a known history of sarcoidosis who presents with atypical symptoms above the diaphragm, such as hiccups or with new-onset arrhythmias.

Dyspnoea in a patient with biopsy-proven pulmonary sarcoidosis: the challenges in diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis

A man in his 60s with biopsy-proven pulmonary sarcoidosis, not on treatment, presented with 6 weeks of dyspnea to the emergency department. ECG showed first-degree atrioventricular block and CT thorax demonstrated progressive pulmonary sarcoidosis with new multifocal consolidation. Antibiotics were initiated.A brain natriuretic peptide was elevated at 2024 ng/L and echocardiogram showed global left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Coronary angiogram revealed normal coronary arteries, and cardiac positron emission tomography and MRI demonstrated patterns compatible with cardiac sarcoidosis. The patient significantly improved with diuresis; he was started on prednisone, methotrexate and standard heart failure therapies.We outline the difficulties of attributing cardiac causes of dyspnoea in a patient with known pulmonary sarcoidosis given the rarity of cardiac involvement. We review proposed diagnostic criteria for cardiac sarcoidosis using enhanced imaging techniques without requiring invasive myocardial biopsy. This case discussion also highlights nuances in managing cardiac sarcoidosis based on the best available evidence and expert consensus.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: a comprehensive review of risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, clinical manifestations, and treatment strategies

Cardiac Sarcoidosis (CS) is a deadly consequence of systemic sarcoidosis that inflames all three layers of the heart, especially the myocardium-clinical signs of CS range from asymptomatic disease to abrupt cardiac death. CS generally remains undiagnosed secondary to a lack of definitive diagnostic criteria, a high percentage of false negative results on endomyocardial biopsy, and ill-defining clinical manifestations of the disease. Consequently, there is a lack of evidence-based recommendations for CS, and the present diagnostic and therapeutic management depend on expert opinion. The aetiology, risk factors, clinical symptoms, diagnosis, and therapy of CS will be covered in this review. A particular emphasis will be placed on enhanced cardiovascular imaging and early identification of CS. We review the emerging evidence regarding the use of Electrocardiograms (ECGs), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of the heart to identify and quantify the extent of myocardial inflammation, as well as to guide the use of immunotherapy and other treatment regimens, such as ablation therapy, device therapy, and heart transplantation, to improve patient outcomes.

Treat to target and tight control: Could be a new approach in the treatment of sarcoidosis?

Sarcoidosis is a chronic granulomatous disease with multisystemic involvement. Although it is accepted as a benign disease, it can sometimes cause life-threatening organ (heart, brain) involvement that determines the prognosis of the disease. There are conflicting opinions about the treatment of the disease. In the generally accepted treatment approach the "step-by-step" model has gained weight. According to this approach, corticosteroids (CS) drugs alone are preferred in the first step in patients who require treatment. In the second step, immunosuppressive drugs (IS) are used in patients who do not respond to CS and/or have contraindications to CS use, and biologics (TNF-alpha inhibitors) are used in the third step. This treatment approach may be valid in cases with mild sarcoidosis. However, although sarcoidosis is considered a benign and self-limiting disease in some major organ involvement, the "step-by-step" approach may be a treatment option that puts the patient's life in danger. In such selected patients, much more rigorous, early and combined treatment approaches that definitely include CS, IS or biologic drugs may be required. In selected sarcoidosis patients with high risk, early diagnosis, "treat-to-target" (T2T) and "tight control" follow-up of patients seems to be a rational approach. This article reviews the "step-down" treatment regimens in light of recent literature data and hypothesizes that the T2T model may be a probable new treatment approach in patients with sarcoidosis.

Hit-hard and early versus step-up treatment in severe sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The treatment of sarcoidosis remains uncertain, despite 70 years of study. The conventional approach is to initiate corticosteroids in individuals who require treatment. The position of more aggressive regimes is unknown.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent recognition that many patients will require prolonged therapy, and the observation that corticosteroids lead to overt and insidious toxicities, have led to suggestions that steroid-sparing medications be used earlier in the management of sarcoidosis. Individuals with poor prognostic features, designated as 'high-risk' sarcoidosis may, especially benefit from a broader palette of therapeutic options in the initial treatment regimen. An even more aggressive approach, known as 'top-down' or 'hit-hard and early' therapy has emerged in the fields of gastroenterology and rheumatology in the past 15 years, on the premise that highly effective early control of inflammation leads to better outcomes. These regimens typically involve early initiation of biologic therapies.

SUMMARY

For certain subpopulations of sarcoidosis patients, 'top-down' therapy could be helpful. Severe pulmonary sarcoidosis, neurosarcoidosis, cardiac sarcoidosis and multiorgan sarcoidosis are phenotypes that may be most relevant for revised therapeutic algorithms. Precision medicine approaches and randomized trials will be necessary to confirm a role for top-down therapy in the routine management of sarcoidosis.

Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis involving only the heart and guts: a case report

Background

The respiratory tract is the most commonly affected organ system in sarcoidosis. Purely extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is rare. There have been no reports of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis with lesions only in the heart and guts.

Case summary

A 19-year-old male was admitted for chest symptoms accompanied by remarkably elevated troponin T and creatinine kinase levels. Electrocardiogram (ECG) showed sinus rhythm with a right bundle branch block, broad ST segment elevation, and abnormal Q waves. Endoscopic biopsy revealed granuloma formation in the transverse colon. Based on multimodal imaging, we made a clinical diagnosis of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis involving only the heart and guts. One year of immunosuppressive therapy with prednisolone resolved the inflammation in the guts but not in the heart. He experienced runs of sustained ventricular tachycardia with loss of consciousness and was admitted to our hospital again. The addition of methotrexate markedly reduced cardiac accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose. No life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias have been recorded afterwards.

Discussion

This unusual case of cardiac sarcoidosis not only involved rare lesions only in the heart and guts but also presented with ST elevation on ECG. This case suggests that the gastrointestinal tract is a site of effective antigen capture outside of the respiratory tract that can affect the heart.

What cardiologists should know about cardiac sarcoidosis in 2022?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a potentially fatal condition when unrecognized or not treated adequately. The purpose of this review is to provide new strategies to increase clinical recognition of CS and to present an updated overview of the immunosuppressive treatments using most recent data published in the last 18 months.

RECENT FINDINGS

CS is an increasingly recognized pathology, and its diagnostic is made 20 times more often in the last two decades. Recent studies have shown that imaging alone usually lacks specificity to distinguish CS from other inflammatory cardiomyopathies. However, imaging can be used to increase significantly diagnostic yield of extracardiac and cardiac biopsy. Recent reviews have also demonstrated that nearly 25% of patients will be refractory to standard treatment with prednisone and that combined treatment with a corticosteroid-sparing agent is often necessary for a period that remains undetermined.

SUMMARY

CS is a complex pathology that should always require a biopsy attempt to have a histological proven diagnosis before starting immunosuppressive therapy consisting of corticosteroids with or without a corticosteroid-sparing agent.

Effect of Corticosteroids on Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an important cause of cardiomyopathy. The trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with CS undergoing treatment remains unclear. Patients with CS who were treated with corticosteroids and who underwent transthoracic echocardiography were studied. Baseline characteristics, treatment, echocardiographic data (including baseline to follow-up change in LVEF), and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Among 100 patients, 55 had baseline reduced LVEF (<50%), and 45 had preserved LVEF (≥50%). At follow-up, 82% of patients demonstrated stable or improved LVEF. Change in LVEF was significantly higher in the baseline reduced than in the preserved LVEF group (5% [interquartile range 0 to 15] vs 0% [interquartile range -10% to 5%], p = 0.001). There was no difference in corticosteroid exposure or use of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy between patients who did experience improvement in LVEF and those who did not experience improvement in LVEF. On multivariable analysis, baseline reduced LVEF (Odds ratio 54.89, 95% confidence interval 3.84 to 785.09, p = 0.003) and complete heart block (Odds ratio 28.88, 95% confidence interval 2.17 to 383.74, p = 0.011) at presentation were significantly associated with reduced LVEF after treatment. In conclusion, most patients with CS treated with corticosteroids maintain or improve LV systolic function. Cardiac characteristics at presentation impact prognosis in CS, despite treatment.

Effectiveness of methotrexate as a second-line treatment for cardiac sarcoidosis assessed via 18F-FDG PET: a case report

Background

Although methotrexate has been widely used as a second-line therapy for cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), it is not clear if it has a direct anti-inflammatory effect.

Case summary

A 65-year-old man presented to our hospital with symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (VT). After cardioversion, electrocardiography showed a first-degree atrioventricular block with a right bundle branch block, and transthoracic echocardiography revealed left ventricular dilatation. After extensive investigations, including fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET), the patient was diagnosed with CS according to the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines. After the implantation of a transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillator, corticosteroid therapy was introduced at a starting dose of 30 mg/day. After corticosteroid therapy was tapered to a maintenance dose of 10 mg/day, he had an uneventful clinical course without symptoms for the 1st year after hospital discharge. However, symptomatic VT recurred and ¹⁸F-FDG PET showed abnormal patterns of cardiac FDG uptake. Although he was treated with corticosteroid therapy once more, which was gradually up-titrated to a dose of 20 mg/day over a 1-month period, myocardial uptake of ¹⁸F-FDG PET remained unchanged. As the patient was considered steroid refractory, second-line treatment with 6 mg/week of methotrexate was introduced, whereas maintaining the dose of corticosteroid therapy at 20 mg/day. After 1 month, ¹⁸F-FDG PET showed remarkable reduction in FDG uptake, and the patient had a good clinical course without further episodes of arrhythmia or other symptoms during an 8-month follow-up.

Discussion

Methotrexate may have a direct anti-inflammatory effect in patients with CS refractory to regular corticosteroid therapy.

[Sarcoidosis]

Sarcoidosis is a granulomatous systemic disease of unknown etiology most commonly affecting the lungs and thoracic lymph nodes. The diagnosis is based on typical clinical radiologic appearance and histology with evidence of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas without central necrosis. In the acute form, Löfgren's syndrome, histologic confirmation may not be necessary. Approximately half of patients may develop a chronic form, and extrathoracic organ involvement should be investigated during the course. Indications for therapy are based on functional limitations, marked organ-related or systemic symptoms, and life-threatening organ manifestations (cardiac, central nervous system, renal, and ocular sarcoidosis). To date, there is no approved drug therapy for sarcoidosis. Administration of immunosuppressants such as glucocorticosteroids and as add-on or sequential, methotrexate, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil is recommended in the currently published international guideline.

Prevalence, incidence and survival outcomes of cardiac sarcoidosis in the South Island, New Zealand

AIMS

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an important cause of mortality in patients with sarcoidosis. The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to characterize the prevalence, incidence, clinical features and outcomes of CS in the southern region of New Zealand.

METHODS AND RESULTS

45 patients were identified: 23 fulfilling international classification criteria, 9 fulfilling physician consensus criteria, and 13 classified as possible CS. As of June 2021, 26 patients were living and domiciled in the Canterbury district; estimated point prevalence was 4.43 cases per 100,000 people. The average annual incidence was 0.24 cases per 100,000 people between 2016 and 2020. We estimated a 5.14% frequency of CS in patients with sarcoidosis. Median age at presentation was 56 years (range 31-72). Common presentations included heart failure, heart block and life threatening ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. Electrocardiogram abnormalities were found in 93.3% and cardiac MRI was often relied upon by physicians for diagnosis. The 10-year survival was 94% (95% CI 78-99%).

CONCLUSION

Our study provides further insight into the epidemiology of CS. In this retrospective cohort the frequency of CS amongst patients with sarcoidosis was estimated at 5%, whilst the estimated point prevalence of the disease was twice that of a contemporary report from the Northern hemisphere. The 10-year survival was similar to contemporaneous reports from other developed countries.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis: When and How to Treat Inflammation

Sarcoidosis is a complex, multisystem inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous clinical spectrum. Approximately 25% of patients with systemic sarcoidosis will have cardiac involvement that portends a poorer outcome. The diagnosis, particularly of isolated cardiac sarcoidosis, can be challenging. A paucity of randomised data exist on who, when and how to treat myocardial inflammation in cardiac sarcoidosis. Despite this, corticosteroids continue to be the mainstay of therapy for the inflammatory phase, with an evolving role for steroid-sparing and biological agents. This review explores the immunopathogenesis of inflammation in sarcoidosis, current evidence-based treatment indications and commonly used immunosuppression agents. It explores a multidisciplinary treatment and monitoring approach to myocardial inflammation and outlines current gaps in our understanding of this condition, emerging research and future directions in this field.

Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis has a multitude of manifestations and affects the human body widely. Pulmonary complaints are most common; however, cardiac, optic, and neurologic manifestations carry high mortality and morbidity. Acute presentations in the emergency room can cause life-altering effects if not appropriately diagnosed and treated. Generally, less severe cases of sarcoidosis have a favorable prognosis and can be treated with steroid therapy. Resistant and more severe cases of the disease carry high mortality and morbidity. It is incredibly important to arrange specialty follow-up for these patients when needed. This review focuses on the acute presentations of sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis: systematic review of literature on corticosteroid and immunosuppressive therapies

Background

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a life-threatening condition in which clear recommendations are lacking. We aimed to systematically review the literature on cardiac sarcoidosis treated by corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive agents in order to update the management of CS.

Methods

Using PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, we found original articles on corticosteroid and standard immunosuppressive therapies for CS that provided at least a fair Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) overall assessment of quality and we analysed the relapse rate, major cardiac adverse events (MACEs) and adverse events. We based our methods on the PRISMA statement and checklist.

Results

We retrieved 21 studies. Mean quality provided by SIGN assessment was 6.8 out of 14 (range 5–9). Corticosteroids appeared to have a positive impact on left ventricular function, atrioventricular block and ventricular arrhythmias. For corticosteroids alone, nine studies (45%, n=351) provided data on relapses, representing an incidence of 34% (n=119). Three studies (14%, n=73) provided data on MACEs (n=33), representing 45% of MACEs in patients treated by corticosteroid alone. Nine studies provided data on adjunctive immunosuppressive therapy, of which four studies (n=78) provided data on CS relapse, representing an incidence of 33% (n=26). Limitations consisted of no randomised control trial retrieved and unclear data on MACEs in patients treated by combined immunosuppressive agents and corticosteroids.

Conclusion

Corticosteroids should be started early after diagnosis but the exact scheme is still unclear. Studies concerning adjunctive conventional immunosuppressive therapies are lacking and benefits of adjunctive immunosuppressive therapies are unclear. Homogenous data on CS long-term outcomes under corticosteroids, immunosuppressive therapies and other adjunctive therapies are lacking.

Corticosteroids are the mainstay treatment for cardiac sarcoidosis. Conventional immunosuppressive agents might be of interest at diagnosis. Cohort studies are clearly heterogeneous. Large cohort and prospective studies using “strong” end-points are lacking.https://bit.ly/3t9Rv8O

Corticosteroid and Immunosuppressant Therapy for Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Systematic Review

Background Corticosteroid therapy for the treatment of clinically manifest cardiac sarcoidosis is generally recommended. Our group previously systematically reviewed the data in 2013; since then, there has been increasing quality and quantity of data and also interest in nonsteroid agents. Methods and Results Studies were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the National Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov database. The quality of included articles was rated using Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network 50. Outcomes examined were atrioventricular conduction, left ventricular function, ventricular arrhythmias, and mortality. A total of 3527 references were retrieved, and 34 publications met the inclusion criteria. There were no randomized trials, and only 2 studies were rated good quality. In the 34 reports (total of 1297 patients), 1125 patients received corticosteroids, 235 received additional or other immunosuppressant therapy, and 97 patients received no therapy. There were 178 patients treated for atrioventricular conduction disease, with 76/178 (42.7%) improving. In contrast, 21 patients were not treated with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressant therapy, and none of them improved. Therapy was associated with the prevention of deterioration in left ventricular function. A total of 8 publications reported on ventricular arrhythmia burden, and 19 reported on mortality; the data quality was too limited to draw conclusions for the latter 2 outcomes. Conclusions The best quality data relate to atrioventricular nodal conduction and left ventricular function recovery. In both situations, therapy with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressant therapy were sometimes associated with positive outcomes. The data quality is too limited to draw conclusions for ventricular arrhythmias and mortality.

Rituximab for the Treatment of Refractory Cardiac Sarcoidosis-A Single Center Experience

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of anti-B cell therapy (rituximab) on cardiac inflammation and function in corticosteroid-refractory cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a rare cause of cardiomyopathy characterized by granulomatous inflammation involving the myocardium. While typically responsive to corticosteroid treatment, there is a critical need for identifying effective steroid-sparing agents for disease control. Despite growing evidence on the role of B-cells in the pathogenesis of sarcoidosis, there is limited data on the efficacy of anti-B cell therapy, specifically rituximab, for controlling CS.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical experience at a tertiary care referral center of all patients with CS who received rituximab after failing to improve with initial immunosuppression therapy, which included corticosteroids. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET/CT) images before and after rituximab treatment were evaluated. All images were interpreted by 2 experienced nuclear medicine trained physicians.

RESULTS

We identified seven patients, (5 men, 2 women; mean age at diagnosis, 49.0±7.9 years) with active cardiac sarcoidosis who were treated with rituximab. The median length of follow-up was 5.1 years. All individuals, but 1, had received prior steroid-sparing agents in addition to corticosteroids. Rituximab was administered either as 1000 mg IV x 1 or x 2 doses, separated by 2 weeks. Repeat dosing, if appropriate, was considered after 6 months. All tolerated the infusions well.Inflammation as assessed by maximum SUV on cardiac FDG PET/CT uptake significantly decreased in 6 of 7 patients (median 6.0 to 4.5, Wilcoxon signed rank z: -1.8593, W: 3), whereas left ventricular ejection fraction improved or stabilized in 4 patients but decreased in 3. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 40.1% and 43.3% before and after treatment respectively (p=0.28). Three patients reported improved physical capacity, and 5 patients showed improved arrhythmic burden on Holter monitoring or ICD interrogation. One patient subsequently developed fungal catheter-associated infection and sepsis requiring discontinuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab was well tolerated and appeared to decrease inflammation, as assessed by cardiac FDG PET/CT scan, in all but 1 patient with active CS. These data suggest that rituximab may be a promising therapeutic option for CS, which deserves further study.

ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations.

RESULTS

The TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment.

MESSAGE

An evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.

Ten Questions Cardiologists Should Be Able to Answer About Cardiac Sarcoidosis: Case-Based Approach and Contemporary Review

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory multisystemic disease of unknown etiology characterized by the formation of noncaseating epithelioid cell granulomas. Cardiac sarcoidosis might be life-threatening and its diagnosis and treatment remain a challenge nowadays. The aim of this review is to provide an updated overview of cardiac sarcoidosis and, through 10 practical clinical questions and real-life challenging case scenarios, summarize the main clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, imaging findings, and contemporary treatment.

Challenges in Cardiac and Pulmonary Sarcoidosis: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Sarcoidosis is a complex disease with heterogeneous clinical presentations that can affect virtually any organ. Although the lung is typically the most common organ involved, combined pulmonary and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) account for most of the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. Pulmonary sarcoidosis can be asymptomatic or result in impairment in quality of life and end-stage, severe, and/or life-threatening disease. The latter outcome is seen almost exclusively in those with fibrotic pulmonary sarcoidosis, which accounts for 10% to 20% of pulmonary sarcoidosis patients. CS is problematic to diagnose and may cause significant morbidity and death from heart failure or ventricular arrhythmias. The diagnosis of CS usually requires surrogate cardiac imaging biomarkers, as endomyocardial biopsy has relatively low yield, even with directed electrophysiological mapping. Treatment of CS is often multifactorial, involving a combination of antigranulomatous therapy and pharmacotherapy for cardiac arrhythmias and/or heart failure in addition to device placement and cardiac transplantation.

Update in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Increasing awareness of cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis and the widespread availability of advanced imaging tests have led to a tidal wave of interest in a condition that was once considered rare. In this Focused Review, we explore important clinical questions that may confront specialists faced with possible cardiac involvement. In the absence of an ideal reference standard, three main sets of clinical criteria exist: the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders criteria. Once cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected, clinicians should be familiar with the prevalence of the disease in different clinical scenarios. Before obtaining advanced cardiac imaging, electrocardiogram, ambulatory electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and B-type natriuretic peptide may be useful. The available therapies for cardiac sarcoidosis include immunosuppression, antiarrhythmic medications, heart failure medications, device therapy, ablation therapy, and heart transplantation. Contemporary data suggest that long-term survival in cardiac sarcoidosis is better than previously believed. There is no randomized controlled trial demonstrating benefits of screening, but screening is recommended based on observational data.

Moderate or Severe Impairment in Pulmonary Function is Associated with Mortality in Sarcoidosis Patients Infected with SARS‑CoV‑2

Purpose

To investigate whether sarcoidosis patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 are at risk for adverse disease outcomes.

Study Design and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in five hospitals within the Mount Sinai Health System during March 1, 2020 to July 29, 2020. All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were included in the study. We identified sarcoidosis patients who met diagnostic criteria for sarcoidosis according to accepted guidelines. An adverse disease outcome was defined as the presence of intubation and mechanical ventilation or in-hospital mortality. In sarcoidosis patients, we reported (when available) the results of pulmonary function testing measured within 3 years prior to the time of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to generate an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) to evaluate sarcoidosis as a risk factor for an adverse outcome. The same model was used to analyze sarcoidosis patients with moderate and/or severe impairment in pulmonary function.

Results

The study included 7337 patients, 37 of whom (0.5%) had sarcoidosis. The crude rate of developing an adverse outcome was significantly higher in patients with moderately and/or severely impaired pulmonary function (9/14 vs. 3/23, p = 0.003). While the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was not independently associated with risk of an adverse event, (aOR 1.8, 95% CI 0.9–3.6), the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in patients with moderately and/or severely impaired pulmonary function was associated with an adverse outcome (aOR 7.8, 95% CI 2.4–25.8).

Conclusion

Moderate or severe impairment in pulmonary function is associated with mortality in sarcoidosis patients infected with SARS‑CoV‑2.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00408-020-00392-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this state-of-the-art review, we highlight our current understanding of diagnosis, assessment, and management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), focusing on recently published data and expert consensus statement guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Academic interest in cardiac sarcoidosis research has increased over the past decade along with increased clinical awareness among clinicians. In 2014, the Heart Rhythm Society published the first expert consensus statement on diagnosing and managing arrhythmias associated with CS. Cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a valuable tool both for diagnosing CS and predicting risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias based on burden of late gadolinium enhancement. Cardiac fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography now plays a role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and assessing response to immunosuppressive therapy. Collaborative, multidisciplinary research efforts are needed to further our understanding of this rare, complex disease. Two large multicenter prospective registries-the international Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium and the Canadian Cardiac Sarcoidosis Research Group-are enrolling patients to help provide insights into the natural history of the disease and current treatment strategies. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials comparing different treatment strategies and identifying and testing novel therapeutic agents.

Long-Term Corticosteroid-Sparing Immunosuppression for Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Background

Long‐term corticosteroid therapy is the standard of care for treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). The efficacy of long‐term corticosteroid‐sparing immunosuppression in CS is unknown. The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of methotrexate with or without adalimumab for long‐term disease suppression in CS, and to assess recurrence and adverse event rates after immunosuppression discontinuation.

Methods and Results

Retrospective chart review identified treatment‐naive CS patients at a single academic medical center who received corticosteroid‐sparing maintenance therapy. Demographics, cardiac uptake of 18‐fluorodeoxyglucose, and adverse cardiac events were compared before and during treatment and between those with persistent or interrupted immunosuppression. Twenty‐eight CS patients were followed for a mean 4.1 (SD 1.5) years. Twenty‐five patients received 4 to 8 weeks of high‐dose prednisone (>30 mg/day), followed by taper and maintenance therapy with methotrexate±low‐dose prednisone (low‐dose prednisone, <10 mg/day). Adalimumab was added in 19 patients with persistently active CS or in those with intolerance to methotrexate. Methotrexate±low‐dose prednisone resulted in initial reduction (88%) or elimination (60%) of 18‐fluorodeoxyglucose uptake, and patients receiving adalimumab‐containing regimens experienced improved (84%) or resolved (63%) 18‐fluorodeoxyglucose uptake. Radiologic relapse occurred in 8 of 9 patients after immunosuppression cessation, 4 patients on methotrexate‐containing regimens, and in no patients on adalimumab‐containing regimens.

Conclusions

Corticosteroid‐sparing regimens containing methotrexate with or without adalimumab is an effective maintenance therapy in patients after an initial response is confirmed. Disease recurrence in patients on and off immunosuppression support need for ongoing radiologic surveillance regardless of immunosuppression regimen.

Clinical Manifestations, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Sarcoidosis

The focus of this review is current knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of both pulmonary sarcoidosis and extrapulmonary sarcoidosis. Although intrathoracic involvement is the hallmark of the disease, present in over 90% of patients, sarcoidosis can affect virtually any organ. Clinical presentations of sarcoidosis are diverse, ranging from asymptomatic, incidental findings to organ failure. Diagnosis requires the presence of noncaseating granuloma and compatible presentations after exclusion of other identifiable causes. Spontaneous remission is frequent, so treatment is not always indicated unless the disease is symptomatic or causes progressive organ damage/dysfunction. Glucocorticoids are the cornerstone of treatment of sarcoidosis even though evidence from randomized controlled studies is lacking. Glucocorticoid-sparing agents and biologic agents are often used as second- and third-line therapy for patients who do not respond to glucocorticoids or experience serious adverse effects.

Diagnosis and Therapy of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Clinical Perspective

Cardiac sarcoidosis, either as part of a systemic process or in its isolated form, is an important and increasingly recognized disorder. It is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality, including sudden cardiac death. Early recognition and prompt initiation of treatment is life-saving. A team approach, involving general cardiologists, cardiac electrophysiologists, cardiac imaging specialists and radiologists, is the key to best diagnose and manage this complex disorder. Advanced cardiac imaging with PET and MRI is useful for both diagnosis and managment of therapy. Treatment for this disorder involves immunosuppresant therapy, ICDs, and guideline-directed medical therapy of congestive heart failure.

Management of Arrhythmias Associated with Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology. The annual incidence of systemic sarcoidosis is estimated at 10-20 per 100,000 individuals. Owing to the recent advances in imaging modalities, cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is diagnosed more frequently. The triad of CS includes conduction abnormality, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are caused by either inflammation or scar formation. Inflammation should be treated with immunosuppression and antiarrhythmic agents and scar formation should be treated with antiarrhythmics and/or ablation, in addition to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, if necessary. Ablation can provide a good outcome, but it might require bipolar ablation if the critical portion is located mid-myocardium. Late recurrence might be caused by reactivation of sarcoidosis, which would need to be evaluated by positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging. Risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with advanced atrioventricular block is not low, and ICD implantation could be considered instead of a pacemaker. For risk stratification for SCD, late gadolinium enhancement by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or program stimulation is often used.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Clinical and subclinical cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) remains diagnostically challenging as the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic modalities are limited. The Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare criteria and the Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on CS are the most common guidelines used to diagnose CS. However, they are mostly based on expert opinions and lack clinical trial validation. The emergence and increase use of newer imaging modalities such as cardiac magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography may give valuable information for accurate diagnosis and assessment of treatment response in CS patient. Although immunosuppressive therapies, particularly corticosteroids, have been proposed as the mainstay of treatment in CS, there is paucity of data on the optimal initiation, duration, and dosage of immunosuppressive therapies. Recommendations are mostly based on small observational studies. Further studies are warranted to better characterize the use of immunosuppressive therapies in this patient population. Device therapies such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are usually recommended for patient with clinical CS. In conclusion, this article synthesizes the current best evidence of utilizing various imaging modalities to diagnose CS and summarizing the main therapeutic approaches to manage and treat CS.

Treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis: A comparative study of steroids and steroids plus immunosuppressive drugs

BACKGROUND

We aimed to compare the efficacy of steroids alone or associated with immunosuppressive drugs for the prevention of relapse in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS).

METHODS

In this monocentric multidisciplinary retrospective single center study, all consecutive patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis hospitalized from January 2012 to December 2016 were considered. All patients with symptomatic CS were studied. Patients received steroids or steroids plus immunosuppressive drugs (IS) for CS treatment at diagnosis. The efficacy of each treatment strategy (steroids vs steroids + IS) was assessed by the cardiac relapse rate over follow up.

RESULTS

326 consecutive patients with histologically proven sarcoidosis were screened. Among them, 36 (11%) had symptomatic CS (20 (55.5%) men, median age at diagnosis 48.5 [22.8-76]). Twenty-four patients received steroids and 12 received steroids + IS (azathioprine n = 5, methotrexate n = 5, cyclophosphamide n = 2) at CS diagnosis. Over a median follow up of 3.6 [1-15.2] years, 13 (36.1%) patients suffered a cardiac relapse including reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, n = 4), third degree heart block (n = 2), atrio-ventricular (n = 1) or ventricular (n = 1) tachycardia and sudden cardiac death (n = 1). Except for a higher frequency of black patients in patients receiving IS, CS features at diagnosis and median time to relapse did not significantly differ between patients who did or did not receive IS. Relapse rate was 45.8% in the steroids group versus 16.7% in the steroids + IS group (p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

In cardiac sarcoidosis, the combination of steroids with immunosuppressive drugs might reduce the risk of cardiac relapse, as compared to steroids alone.

Japanese Antibacterial Drug Management for Cardiac Sarcoidosis (J-ACNES): A multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled study

BACKGROUND

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a noncaseating granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Lifelong immunosuppressive therapy, most frequently using corticosteroids, is a standard therapy to control hypersensitivity of immune reactions and prevent inflammation. However, it sometimes causes various systemic adverse effects and requires dose escalation. Thus, additional therapy may be required for the treatment of this disease. Recently, Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) was reported as one of the etiologic agents of CS, indicating that antibacterial drugs (ABD) may be effective for the treatment of CS. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of ABD treatment, in addition to standard corticosteroid therapy, in patients with CS.

METHODS

The Japanese Antibacterial Drug Management for Cardiac Sarcoidosis (J-ACNES) trial was designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled clinical trial. The patients will be randomized to receive either standard corticosteroid therapy plus ABD therapy (ABD group) or standard corticosteroid therapy (standard group). The primary endpoint is change in the total standardized uptake value at 6 months vs baseline using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Secondary endpoints include efficacy, prognosis, and safety.

RESULTS

The results of this study are currently under investigation.

CONCLUSION

The J-ACNES trial will be the first prospective study assessing the clinical benefit and safety of ABD therapy, in addition to corticosteroid treatment, in patients with CS. Our findings may improve treatment of patients with CS, as additional ABD therapy reduces recurrence of inflammation and elucidates the mechanism of sarcoidosis.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis Concomitant with Large-vessel Aortitis Detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography

We herein report a case of concurrent cardiac sarcoidosis and large-vessel aortitis detected by ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and followed up during immunosuppressive therapy. After high-dose prednisolone administration (1 mg/kg), serial FDG-PET showed that almost all of the abnormal FDG uptake in the heart and extracardiac region, including the abdominal to bilateral iliac arteries, had been disappeared. During the tapering of prednisolone, additive methotrexate therapy was needed to treat the recurrence of cardiac sarcoidosis. FDG-PET is a useful tool for detecting cardiac sarcoidosis concomitant with large-vessel aortitis and monitoring the effectiveness of immunosuppressive therapy.