Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis in Cataract Surgery: Overview of Current Practice Patterns Around the World

Controversies in the management of endophthalmitis: a 5-year retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Post-operative endophthalmitis has a risk of vision loss if the treatment is delayed. Managing endophthalmitis based on visual outcome has become controversial. This study primarily aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of early pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) combined with intravitreal antibiotics in improving visual acuity and reducing complications in patients with post-operative endophthalmitis. Secondary objectives included identifying prognostic factors influencing visual outcomes after PPV, assessing the effectiveness of different intravitreal antibiotic regimens on visual recovery, and evaluating the role of steroid as adjunctive therapy in influencing visual outcome and controlling inflammation.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective cohort study was conducted, reviewing medical records of patients diagnosed with post-operative endophthalmitis between 2019 and 2023. Data collected included patient demographics, medical and surgical history, culture results, treatments administered, baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and BCVA outcomes within three months after vitrectomy.

RESULTS

40 eyes of 40 patients with acute post-operative endophthalmitis underwent early PPV followed by intravitreal antibiotics. Median logMAR BCVA improved from 2.0 at presentation to 0.4 three months post-vitrectomy (p < 0.05), with a mean final logMAR BCVA of 0.94 ± 1.13. No significant difference was observed in visual outcomes or complication rates between patients treated with intravitreal vancomycin and ceftazidime versus moxifloxacin monotherapy. Univariate analysis identified high intraocular pressure (p = 0.004, β = 2.42), hypopyon (p = 0.01, β = 1.79), and a history of surgery more than seven days prior (p = 0.032, β = 1.74) as significant predictive of visual outcomes. Multivariate analysis confirmed intraocular pressure (p = 0.008, β = 2.55) and surgical history (p = 0.045, β = 1.84) as independent predictors. Baseline BCVA, fibrin, retinal findings, and symptom onset were not significantly associated with outcomes. Neither antibiotics regimen nor steroid use significantly influenced treatment results.

CONCLUSION

This study supports performing early PPV combined with intravitreal antibiotics as an effective primary treatment to improve visual outcomes in post-operative endophthalmitis. Negative prognostic factors included hypopyon, elevated intraocular pressure, and a surgical history of more than seven days. Management should prioritize clinical signs over microbiological culture results to prevent delays in treatment.

Impact of discontinuation of cephazolin prophylaxis on the incidence of postoperative adverse events in cataract surgery

BACKGROUND

Cataract surgeries are increasing annually, making appropriate medical management essential. The routine use of systemic antimicrobial agents for preventing surgical site infections lacks strong evidence and may increase the risk of drug-resistant bacteria and adverse events. This study examined the impact of discontinuing cefazolin (CEZ) administration during the perioperative period of cataract surgery on the incidence of postoperative adverse events and medical costs.

METHODS

Inpatient cataract surgery patients were divided into two groups: the CEZ-use group (April 2021 to March 2022) and the non-CEZ-use group (April 2022 to March 2023). The primary endpoints were the incidence of adverse events and medical costs, while the secondary endpoint was the incidence of endophthalmitis.

RESULTS

A total of 265 patients were in the CEZ group, and 316 were in the non-CEZ group. Six postoperative adverse events (2.3%, 95% confidence interval: 0.8-4.9) occurred in the CEZ group, with an estimated 230 patients (80-490 from the 95% confidence interval) expected to experience adverse events per 10,000 patients using CEZ. The non-CEZ group had no adverse events and reduced drug costs by approximately 46,000 yen. Insurance claim amounts were also reduced. No cases of early postoperative endophthalmitis were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Discontinuation of CEZ prophylaxis during the perioperative period of cataract surgery effectively reduced the risk of adverse events. Medical for the period after discontinuing CEZ did not increase.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered.

Characterization of Conjunctival Microflora and Antibiotic Sensitivity Patterns in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

This study aims to characterize the conjunctival flora of patients scheduled for cataract surgery and determine the susceptibility profile of isolated bacteria to several commonly used topical antibiotics. Conjunctival swabs were taken from 44 consecutive patients (25 males, 19 females; mean age of 75.0 ± 12.6 years) who were scheduled for senile cataract surgery at two Italian centers before starting any prophylactic preoperative treatment. Swabs were processed for the detection of the microbial growth and for species identification. Selective culture media were used, and bacteria were identified using the MicroScan Specialty ID Panels (Beckman Coulter®, Brea, CA, USA). Antimicrobial susceptibility for the following antibiotics (netilmicin, tobramycin, ofloxacin, oxacillin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, chloramphenicol, cefuroxime, and azithromycin) were assessed using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method. Susceptibility for oxacillin was useful to identify methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Among the swabs analyzed, 61.4% showed only saprophytic flora, 30.7% showed only potential pathogenic flora, and 8.0% showed mixed flora. S. epidermidis (20.5%), S. intermedius (18.2%), and S. aureus (14.8%) were the most frequent isolates; MRSA and MRSE accounted for 8.0% and 6.8% of isolates. Less frequently (9%), Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas fluorescent, Serratia marcescens, Moraxella lacunata, Morganella morgani, and Stenotrophomonas maltophila were detected. All isolated organisms showed an excellent sensitivity to moxifloxacin and chloramphenicol (range 83-100%, range 67-100%, Gram-positive sensitivity for moxifloxacin and chloramphenicol, respectively; 100% Gram-negative sensitivity for both). A significant percentage of the eyes of candidates for surgery presented potential pathogenic flora alone or in association with saprophytic organisms. Staphylococci were the most frequently isolated bacteria. Tobramycin and Ofloxacin, widely used in the ophthalmic field, are confirmed to have a reduced sensitivity in vitro.

A New Approach to Evaluate the Bactericidal Activity of Different Antiseptic Ophthalmic Preparations Used as Surgical Prophylaxis

Background: A survey conducted by the European Observatory on Cataract Surgery showed high heterogeneity in the use of antiseptics both preoperatively and in the operating room, highlighting the absence of a global consensus regarding ocular infection prophylaxis in cataract surgery. Methods: The antibacterial activity of seven antiseptic ophthalmic formulations (AOFs) registered as medical devices and the two most common disinfectants were evaluated in vitro against five bacterial species. The viability of bacterial strains after exposure to the antiseptic was evaluated with different techniques: the in vitro Minimum Inhibitory Concentration and the subsequent Minimum Bactericidal Concentration, performed on liquid and solid culture medium. Furthermore, a real-time assessment of bacterial viability was conducted using double staining for live/dead bacterial cells by fluorimetric assay. This evaluation was performed on both the time-killing curve and the tear dilution effect test. Results: We observed a high variability across the different AOFs in terms of inhibitory/bactericidal concentration and timing on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial classes. The results indicated that among the tested AOFs, Visuprime, Iodim, and Oftasteril were the most rapid and effective for ocular surface disinfection against the tested bacterial species. Conclusions: The obtained results can support the clinician's choice of the most suitable AOF for the prevention and treatment of ophthalmic infections associated with surgery.

Comparison of iodine compounds and levofloxacin as postoperative instillation; conjunctival bacterial flora and antimicrobial susceptibility following cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To compare the cleanliness of the conjunctival sac following the use of iodine compounds (PAI) and levofloxacin as postoperative eye drops.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective open-label study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Either topical levofloxacin or fourfold-diluted PAI was administered for 1 week postoperatively in 128 eyes of 128 patients who underwent routine cataract surgery. Conjunctival samples were obtained at three time points: pre-surgery, 1 week postoperatively, and 1 month postoperatively.

RESULTS

The respective positive bacterial culture rates for postoperative iodine and levofloxacin were 88.1% and 85.2% pre-surgery, 71.6% and 50.8% 1 week postoperatively, and 92.5% and 86.5% 1 month postoperatively. Positive bacterial culture rates in both groups significantly declined at 1 week, and the rates returned to the baseline level 1 month postoperatively. The magnitude of reduction of DNA copy number detected by polymerase chain reaction at 1 week was larger in the levofloxacin group, although no significant differences were seen at pre-surgery or 1 month postoperatively. In the levofloxacin group, only one strain was culture positive at 1 week, however, its minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against S. epidermidis was high (128 µg/ml). The MIC value increased from 2.31 ± 2.19 µg/ml pre-surgery to 57.14 ± 22.34 µg/ml 1 month postoperatively, while no significant change was found in the iodine group.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative iodine and levofloxacin eye drops both reduced bacterial contamination in the conjunctival sac, with a superior level of disinfection in the levofloxacin group. However, postoperative levofloxacin eye drops enhanced the emergence of highly resistant bacteria, whereas no such development was seen in the iodine group.

A survey of Asian Eye Institutions on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in cataract surgery

PURPOSE

To determine current institutional practice patterns for the use of perioperative antibiotics and other measures to prevent infection after cataract surgery in Asia.

METHODS

An online survey-based study of leading eye institutions in China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Pakistan, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam was conducted. The survey was administered to 26 representative key opinion leaders from prominent tertiary eye institutions that are also national academic teaching institutions in Asia. Survey responses were collated and anonymized during analysis.

RESULTS

All surveyed institutions used povidone iodine for the preoperative antiseptic preparation of the eye, with notable variations in the concentration of povidone iodine used for conjunctival sac instillation. Preoperative topical antibiotics were prescribed by 61.5% and 69.2% of institutions in low-risk and high-risk cases, respectively. Regarding the use of intra-operative antibiotics, 60.0% and 66.7% of institutions administered intracameral antibiotics in low-risk and high-risk patients, respectively. Postoperative topical antibiotics use patterns were generally very similar in low-risk and high-risk patients. Over half of the institutions (52.2% and 68.0% in low-risk and high-risk patients, respectively) also indicated prolonged postoperative use of topical antibiotics (> 2 weeks). Not all surveyed institutions had established policies/protocols for perioperative antibiotic use in cataract surgery, endophthalmitis surveillance, and/or a monitoring program for emerging antimicrobial resistance.

CONCLUSION

There are variations in antimicrobial prophylaxis approaches to preoperative, intra-operative and postoperative regimens in cataract surgery in Asia. More evidence-based research is needed to support the development of detailed guidelines for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis to reduce postoperative infections.

Antibiotic prophylaxis for cataract surgery - Practice patterns amongst Indian Ophthalmologists

Purpose

To assess the current trends in use of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis, especially intracameral antibiotics (ICAB), for cataract surgery in India.

Methods

This was an E-survey using a previously validated questionnaire carried out by the All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) in August 2022. An E-mail invitation to complete an online 40-point survey was sent to all members of the AIOS using a digital E-mail service (Survey Monkey) and social media platforms.

Results

Out of 1804 total respondents, 58% (n = 1022) reported using routine ICAB prophylaxis. Of those using ICAB, 89% (n = 909) reported using it for all cases, whereas the rest used it for specific indications such as post-PC rent (n = 43), one eyed patient (n = 19), and high-risk cases (n = 50). Commercially available moxifloxacin was by far the commonest agent used for ICAB (n = 686, 67%). Eighty respondents (8%) reported noticing occasional toxic reactions and nontoxic corneal edema (n = 64, 6%) with ICAB. Surgeons with >10 years' experience especially practicing in medical colleges used fewer ICAB (OR = 0.52, 95%CI = 0.38 - 0.72, P < 0,001) compared to younger surgeons (<5-year experience) in solo clinics. The commonest reason for nonadoption of IC antibiotics was "unconvinced of the need to use it in my setting" (n = 296, 52% of those who answered this question).

Conclusion

IC antibiotic prophylaxis for cataract surgery has significantly increased in India from 40% in 2017 to 58% in 2022. Commercially available moxifloxacin was preferred by the majority users. Intraocular inflammation may occur occasionally and needs safer formulations to avoid this.

Prophylaxis of Ocular Infection in the Setting of Intraocular Surgery: Implications for Clinical Practice and Risk Management

In this review we discuss the role of intraocular surgery preoperative prophylaxis. The correct choice of antimicrobial drug is variable in each surgical setting, according to the available strengths of evidence, the anatomical district involved, and the type of procedure. In the ophthalmic surgical field, there has been a progressive shift from antibiotic formulations, which are known to cause antibiotic resistance, to a new class of antiseptic compounds, which proved to be effective not only against bacteria, but also against fungi, protozoa, and viruses. Among these, povidone-iodine (PVI) is a water-soluble polymer that can form a complex with iodine, and the perioperative application of PVI 5-10% eye drop for 3 min is the gold standard for infection prophylaxis. A new formulation of 0.6% PVI eye drop is a new option for infection prophylaxis in the days before surgery. Chlorhexidine is a biguanide compound, which is a valid alternative with a good safety and efficacy profile and is the antiseptic of choice in patients with iodine allergy. New compounds that are currently being studied include polyhexamethylene biguanide (PHMB), picloxydine, ozone, hypochlorous acid (HOCl), and Biosecur. PHMB is a biguanide polymer that was found to be more effective than PVI in in vitro studies for reducing microorganisms and extending the duration of antisepsis, but to date, there are no formulations available on the market for preoperative ocular surgery in which it is present as main ingredient. Ozone is a molecule with oxidizing effect, which showed interesting preliminary results but is not effective against virus, Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans. HOCl has a natural bactericidal propriety but its applicability to prophylaxis of ocular infection in the setting of ocular surgery is not established. Biosecur is a non-toxic organic alcohol-free compound that exhibited bactericidal and fungicidal effect versus all common microorganisms and is currently available as an ocular spray.

Effect of Liposomal-Lactoferrin-Based Eye Drops on the Conjunctival Microflora of Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Postoperative endophthalmitis is typically caused by the patient's conjunctival bacterial flora. Povidone iodine solution (5%) is used perioperatively to obtain periocular and ocular antisepsis. However, an adjunctive prophylaxis procedure could further help control the conjunctival microbial load. Considering the increase in antibiotic resistance, a progressive shift toward alternative methods would be desirable. Somilux® eye drops (Alfa Intes, lactoferrin-based eye drops) are medical devices containing liposomal lactoferrin (LF). This study evaluates the effects on conjunctival microflora of LF-based eye drops used in the preoperative phase in patients scheduled for cataract surgery.

METHODS

LF-based eye drops or a vehicle solution (water solution) were instilled 4 times a day starting 3 days before cataract surgery. Before the therapy (T0) and at the time of surgery (T1), a conjunctival swab was performed in both eyes and processed to detect microbial growth, microbiological isolation, and species identification. The outcome was the quantification and characterization of the local microbial flora before and after using LF-based or vehicle-based eye drops. Safety of the treatments was also evaluated.

RESULTS

88 eyes of 44 patients (mean [± SD] age 75 [± 12.6] years) were enrolled. At baseline, 54 conjunctival swabs showed only saprophytic flora, 27 showed only potential pathogenic flora, and seven showed both of them. LF-based eye drops reduced the proportion of potentially pathogenic bacteria (36% at T0 vs. 9% at T1, p = 0.008) compared with the vehicle (41% at T0 vs. 55% at T1, p = 0.302) without altering the physiological ocular microbial composition. No adverse events have been reported.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide a novel contribution to the scientific knowledge on the role of LF in the ophthalmic field, supporting the use of LF-based eye drops as a safe and selective treatment to improve the ocular surface physiological defenses and control the bacterial ocular surface contamination prior to cataract surgery.

Are Prophylactic Systemic Antibiotics Required in Patients with Cataract Surgery at Local Anesthesia?

The reduced use of antimicrobial drugs has been recommended worldwide, according to the global action for antimicrobial resistance published in 2015 by the World Health Organization. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the incidence of surgical site infection in consecutive patients with cataract surgeries at a single hospital in the 6-year process when prophylactic systemic antibiotics were reduced in a step-by-step manner. The entire study period from 2016 to 2022 was divided into five stages, based on the use of systemic antibiotics. In stage 1 with 649 cataract surgeries, an intravenous drip infusion of cefazolin 1 g was given at surgery, followed by oral cefdinir 100 mg in the evening on surgery day and three times for two postoperative days. In stage 2 with 541 cataract surgeries, oral cefdinir 100 mg was given in the late morning before surgery, in the evening, and three times (300 mg in total) for two postoperative days. In stage 3 with 103 cataract surgeries, oral levofloxacin 500 mg was given in the late morning before surgery and once in the morning for two postoperative days. In stage 4 with 545 cataract surgeries, oral levofloxacin 500 mg was given only in the late morning before surgery. In stage 5 with 311 cataract surgeries, no systemic antibiotics were given. As common procedures in all stages, moxifloxacin eye drops were given four times daily as topical antibiotics in the 3 days before surgery and about 2 weeks after surgery. At surgery, the ocular surface was frequently irrigated with saline-diluted povidone iodine at 0.5% working concentration. No postoperative infection was recorded in any stage. This study showed neither harm nor risk in reduced use and, consequently, no use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in cataract surgery as far as local precautionary measures were secured.

All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) Task Force guidelines to prevent intraocular infections and cluster outbreaks after cataract surgery

Infectious endophthalmitis is a serious and vision-threatening complication of commonly performed intraocular surgeries such as cataract surgery. The occurrence of endophthalmitis can result in severe damage to the uveal and other ocular tissues even among patients undergoing an uncomplicated surgical procedure. If the infections result from common factors such as surgical supplies, operative or operation theater-related risks, there can be a cluster outbreak of toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) or infectious endophthalmitis, leading to several patients having an undesirable outcome. Since prevention of intraocular infections is of paramount importance to ophthalmic surgeons, the All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS) has taken the lead in the formation of a National Task Force to help ophthalmic surgeons apply certain universal precautions in their clinical practice. The Task Force has prepared a handy checklist and evidence-based guidelines to minimize the risk of infectious endophthalmitis following cataract surgery.

Cataract Surgery by Intraoperative Surface Irrigation with 0.25% Povidone-Iodine

Postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery is typically caused by the patient's own conjunctival normal bacterial flora. A three-step approach is recommended to prevent endophthalmitis: (1) "border control" to prevent microorganisms from entering the eye by disinfecting the ocular surface is the most important measure; (2) bacteria that have gained access into the anterior chamber are reduced by irrigation; (3) bacteria remaining in the anterior chamber and vitreous at the end of surgery are controlled by antibacterial drugs. We have devised a method, "the Shimada technique", for irrigating the ocular surface with povidone-iodine, a disinfectant with potent microbicidal effect and established effective and safe concentrations for eye tissues. Povidone-iodine exhibits a bactericidal effect for a wide concentration range of 0.005-10%, but 0.1% povidone-iodine has the highest activity and requires the shortest time of only 15 s to achieve microbicidal effect. When used to irrigate the ocular surface every 20-30 s during cataract surgery, 0.25% povidone-iodine is conceivably diluted to around 0.1%. Irrigation with 0.25% povidone-iodine during cataract surgery significantly reduced bacteria contamination rate in the anterior chamber compared with saline (p = 0.0017) without causing corneal endothelial damage.

Short-Term Use of Dexamethasone/Netilmicin Fixed Combination in Controlling Ocular Inflammation After Uncomplicated Cataract Surgery

Purpose

To evaluate the short-term anti-inflammatory effect of dexamethasone/netilmicin fixed combination in the management of ocular inflammation after cataract surgery.

Patients and Methods

Open-label, randomized, active-controlled, clinical study conducted in 6 sites in Italy; 238 patients were randomized 2:1 to dexamethasone/netilmicin (dexa/net, n=158) or betamethasone/chloramphenicol (beta/chl, n=80). Treatment started the day of surgery and continued 4 times daily for 7 days. The primary efficacy parameter was the anterior chamber (AC) flare. The percentage of patients displaying none or mild (ie, only barely detectable) AC flare was defined as “efficacy rate”, whereas the percentage of patients showing a decrease of AC flare score from baseline was defined as “percentage of responders”. Additional parameters evaluated were AC cells, conjunctival hyperaemia, corneal and lid oedema, symptoms of ocular discomfort, visual acuity, and intraocular pressure. Dexa/net was considered effective if the efficacy rate was not inferior (by means of 97.5% confidence interval) to that of beta/chl.

Results

After 7 days of treatment, no AC flare was observed in 92.8% (dexa/net) and 92.3% (beta/chl) of patients, whereas no AC cells were observed in 91.5% (dexa/net) and 93.6% (beta/chl) of patients, respectively. The “efficacy rate” was 100% in both groups, whereas the “percentage of responders” was 94.1% in the dexa/net and 93.6% in the beta/chl group. The p-value to reject the null hypothesis of inferiority was <0.001. Other efficacy parameters confirmed both treatments as highly effective, despite their difference in steroid content (2 mg/mL for beta/chl vs 1 mg/mL for dexa/net). IOP and visual acuity at the end of the study were comparable. Two cases of allergic conjunctivitis were considered adverse events and were both related to dexa/net.

Conclusion

Short-term use of dexa/net fixed combination is safe and effective in the control of post-operative inflammation following uncomplicated cataract surgery.

Emerging Enterococcus isolates in postoperative endophthalmitis by selection pressure of fluoroquinolones: an 11-year multicenter and experimental study

Postoperative endophthalmitis (PE) is the devastating complication that frequently results in vision loss. Recently, enterococcus have emerged as a major cause of PE in several countries and resulted in poor visual outcome. However, the reason remains elusive. We investigate whether selection pressure of fluoroquinolone exerts effects on microorganism profiles isolated from PE. Medical records of patients who were diagnosed with PE at eight resident training institutions between January 2004 and December 2015 were reviewed. The most common isolate was Enterococcus faecalis (28.0%), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (18.6%) and other coagulase negative Staphylococci (7.6%). However, the rates of E. faecalis isolated from conjunctival microbes were 6.2% (16/257) and their resistance to fluoroquinolones was higher than those of S. epidermidis. In vitro and in vivo co-culture models of E. faecalis and S. epidermidis were established for survival assays after administration of fourth-generation fluoroquinolone. In in vitro co-culture model, the survival assay of E. faecalis and S. epidermidis against the treatment of moxifloxacin showed that E. faecalis survived significantly better than S. epidermidis in the presence of moxifloxacin 1 µg/mL and more. In in vivo co-culture model, E. faecalis survived significantly better than S. epidermidis after topical treatment of moxifloxacin (5 mg/mL). E. faecalis has been the most common causative strain of PE in Korea. We suggest that the increase of E. faecalis in PE could be associated with the selection pressure of fourth-generation fluoroquinolone.

Summary:Enterococcus spp. have emerged as a leading causative strain of postoperative endophthalmitis in 11-year clinical data. We suggest that the increase of Enterococcus spp. is associated with the selection pressure of fourth-generation fluoroquinolone.

Postoperative Endophthalmitis and Toxic Anterior Segment Syndrome Prophylaxis: 2020 Update

Improved surgical techniques have led to an increase in the number of outpatient ophthalmic procedures. In spite of decreased surgical times and overall improved outcomes, endophthalmitis remains one of the most severe complications of ophthalmic surgery. Although there are well known risk factors for postoperative endophthalmitis, some prophylaxis strategies remain controversial. A category of noninfectious postoperative inflammation, known as toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS), is a rare but important complication of cataract surgery. While several worldwide outbreaks of TASS have occurred, it is challenging to identify an etiology in order to reduce the risk of further cases. Endophthalmitis and TASS cannot be prevented completely, but their rates may be decreased through risk reduction strategies supported by peer-reviewed evidence. This review highlights the current evidence in the prevention strategies for postoperative endophthalmitis and TASS.

An investigation on the current patterns of using consumables and sterilizing accessories in phacoemulsification in China

PURPOSE

To survey the routine application of consumables and sterilized accessories of phacoemulsification in mainland China.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study. A questionnaire link was sent to Chinese ophthalmologists via the most widely used social communication tool (WeChat platform).

RESULTS

A total of 815 questionnaires were determined to be valid and were included in the final analysis. The majority of respondents were from Guangdong, Shandong, Zhejiang, Hebei, and Henan provinces. A number of hospitals (48.22%) reused the fluidics management system (FMS) after sterilization. Among the hospitals using disposable FMS, 38.03% reused tubing after sterilization. Most respondents' hospitals (70.43%) sterilized the handpiece for each operation. Only 38.77% of the respondents' hospitals adopted irrigation fluid antibiotics and/or intracameral antibiotics intraoperatively. Greater single usage of FMS was significantly associated with higher provincial gross domestic product (GDP), government hospitals, provincial hospitals, and disposable tubing (P < 0.05). The adoption of irrigation fluid/intracameral antibiotics was correlated with the financial type of the hospital, the daily volume of phacoemulsification, and the usage of silicone tubing (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results show a wide variation in the application of consumables and the sterilization of accessories in phacoemulsification in mainland China. Only half of the hospitals adopted interfusion/intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis, despite its efficacy having been confirmed. These data revealed potential safety issues of the sterilization of phacoemulsification instruments and the risk of intraocular infection.

Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: Effect of behind-the-lens washout

PURPOSE

To analyze the outcomes of cataract surgery with emphasis on the relationship between surgery-related factors and the incidence of postoperative infectious endophthalmitis.

SETTING

Ninety-three surgical sites in Japan.

DESIGN

Prospective case series.

METHODS

Eyes that were scheduled to have cataract surgery from January 20 to September 30, 2014, were included. Phacoemulsification and implantation of a single-piece hydrophobic acrylic foldable intraocular lens (IOL) were performed. Patients were followed for 2 months.

RESULTS

Of the 9720 eyes enrolled, 9100 (93.6%) completed a 2-month follow-up. Three cases (0.033%) developed infectious endophthalmitis (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.000-0.070). The incidence of endophthalmitis was significantly associated with the removal method of ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) after IOL implantation. The incidences of endophthalmitis in cases with and without the behind-the-lens technique were 0% (0/6147; 95% CI, 0%) and 0.084% (3/3570; 95% CI, 0.000-0.179), respectively, with a significant difference between them (P = .050, Fisher exact test). The incidence of infectious endophthalmitis did not correlate with any other patient-related and surgery-related factors.

CONCLUSION

The behind-the-lens technique to wash and clear the capsular bag for OVD removal significantly reduced the incidence of infectious endophthalmitis.

Effectiveness of intraoperative iodine in cataract surgery: cleanliness of the surgical field without preoperative topical antibiotics

PURPOSE

To verify the possibility that preoperative topical antibiotics are not essential as long as iodine disinfection is performed during surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Crossover equivalence trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In 204 eyes of 102 patients who underwent routine bilateral cataract surgery, 1 eye was treated with intraoperative iodine, and the other, with preoperative topical antibiotics. For the intraoperative iodine eyes, 5 mL of 0.25% povidone-iodine was applied at 2 stages: (1) just after the placement of the speculum and (2) before intraocular lens (IOL) insertion. For the contralateral eyes, preoperative topical antibiotics were administered 3 days before surgery without intraoperative iodine. Conjunctival samples for culture were obtained at 3 time points: (a) presurgery, (b) beginning of surgery, and (c) postsurgery. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) samples were obtained at the beginning of surgery and before IOL insertion. Intracameral moxifloxacin was applied in all the cases.

RESULTS

The respective positive bacterial culture rates for intraoperative iodine eyes and preoperative topical antibiotics eyes were 95.1% and 98.0% at (a), 7.8% and 5.9% at (b), and 60.8% and 62.7% at (c). A significant difference in the positive bacterial culture rate was not found at any time point. For the intraoperative iodine eyes, the bacterial DNA copy number at (b) was significantly lower than that for the preoperative topical antibiotics eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

The cleanliness of the operative field without using topical antibiotics was revealed to be equivalent to that of the conventional method (using preoperative antibiotics without intraoperative iodine) as long as intraoperative iodine was used.

Poor penetration of cefcapene into aqueous humor after oral administration of cefcapene pivoxil to patients undergoing cataract surgery

OBJECTIVES

Studies on the penetration of orally administered cephalosporins to the aqueous humor are scarce. Therefore, in this study, we determined the concentration of cefcapene, a third-generation cephalosporin administrated orally as pivalate ester (cefcapene pivoxil), in the aqueous humor of patients undergoing cataract surgery to assess its potential for preventing postoperative endophthalmitis.

METHODS

Forty-four patients were administered a single dose of 100 mg cefcapene pivoxil preoperatively. Blood and aqueous humor samples were obtained at the time of surgery, and cefcapene concentrations were measured using ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection.

RESULTS

The samples were obtained from 41 eyes of 39 patients (two patients underwent surgery in both eyes). The median cefcapene concentrations in the aqueous humor after 1-2 h, 2-3 h, and later than 3 h were 8.3, 18.4, and 23.7 ng/mL, respectively. The median cefcapene concentrations in serum after 1-2 h, 2-3 h, and later than 3 h were 198.5, 287.2, and 170.3 ng/mL, respectively. Aqueous humor penetration of cefcapene after 1-2 h, 2-3 h, and later than 3 h was 4.1, 7.9, and 13.5% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Aqueous humor penetration of orally-administered cefcapene pivoxil in patients undergoing cataract surgery was poor. Therefore, cefcapene pivoxil was unlikely to be effective for preventing endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.

The Routine Use of Intracameral Antibiotics to Prevent Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery: How Good is the Evidence?

Post-operative endophthalmitis (POE) following cataract surgery is an uncommon, vision-threatening complication that has been reported to occur at rates of between approximately 0.03% and 0.2%. Prompt diagnosis and treatment of endophthalmitis is critical for minimizing vision loss, but most recent efforts have focused on the prophylactic administration of antibiotics to prevent the development of endophthalmitis. Surgeons from around the world have different topical and intracameral antibiotic usage patterns to prevent endophthalmitis, and to date no general consensus regarding best practice has emerged. Several studies have reported on the routine use of intracameral cefuroxime, moxifloxacin, and vancomycin, including a single randomized clinical trial by the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ESCRS) in 2007. These studies have notable shortcomings, but many authors suggest that intracameral cefuroxime together with topical antibiotics probably decreases the risk of endophthalmitis. However, the deleterious effects of routine prophylactic antibiotics, which include toxicity, cost, and increasing antimicrobial resistance, among others, are noteworthy. In contrast, aseptic technique with pre-operative instillation of povidone-iodine remains the only technique supported by level I evidence to reduce the incidence of endophthalmitis. Although the routine use of intracameral antibiotics continues to increase throughout the world, data from multicenter, randomized, prospective trials is needed to provide better guidance regarding the prophylactic use of antibiotics.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in cataract surgery - An evidence-based approach

Various protocols are being followed for endophthalmitis prophylaxis in cataract surgery, and this subject continues to be a matter of debate. We summarize the most recent evidence-based studies on this topic with additional stress on intracameral (IC) antibiotic prophylaxis. Here, we discuss several large, international clinical studies which discuss the efficacy, adoption, safety, cost, and newer trends in antibiotic prophylaxis. Majority of these studies report a significant reduction in endophthalmitis rates with IC antibiotic prophylaxis. Efficacy data have been reported for IC cefuroxime, vancomycin, and moxifloxacin. Surgeons are now looking for alternatives to vancomycin for IC prophylaxis because of its association with the rare but sight-threatening complication of hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis. A recent large clinical study shows convincing efficacy with IC moxifloxacin prophylaxis. Two large studies have also reported significant endophthalmitis reduction following use of IC antibiotic prophylaxis, in eyes with posterior capsule tear which are at highest risk for infection. Except for one randomized controlled trial, there is a lack of prospective data on this subject; however, considering the complexity of performing such studies, surgeons have to rely on the mounting evidence from other recent big data studies. Availability of approved intraocular antibiotic formulations will see a much higher adoption in the future.

Endophthalmitis Prophylaxis for Cataract Surgery

Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery is a rare but potentially devastating complication. There is great variability in endophthalmitis prophylaxis practice patterns worldwide. Treatment varies globally and is based on the microbiological profile and availability of formulations. Periocular povidone-iodine antisepsis is universally adopted and considered the standard of care in most practices. Perioperative topical antibiotics are also very popular despite the lack of level 1 evidence confirming efficacy. Based on growing observational evidence, routine intracameral antibiotic prophylaxis is increasing, especially where approved commercial intraocular preparations are available. This review updates recent trends and evidence regarding endophthalmitis prophylaxis and the preferred choice of intracameral antibiotics.