Comparative Proteome Profiling and Mutant Protein Identification in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Cells by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-based Proteogenomics

From molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer to translational applications: based on multi-omics fusion analysis and intelligent medicine

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men worldwide and has a high mortality rate. The complex and heterogeneous development of prostate cancer has become a core obstacle in the treatment of prostate cancer. Simultaneously, the issues of overtreatment in early-stage diagnosis, oligometastasis and dormant tumor recognition, as well as personalized drug utilization, are also specific concerns that require attention in the clinical management of prostate cancer. Some typical genetic mutations have been proved to be associated with prostate cancer's initiation and progression. However, single-omic studies usually are not able to explain the causal relationship between molecular alterations and clinical phenotypes. Exploration from a systems genetics perspective is also lacking in this field, that is, the impact of gene network, the environmental factors, and even lifestyle behaviors on disease progression. At the meantime, current trend emphasizes the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques to process extensive multidimensional data, including multi-omics. These technologies unveil the potential patterns, correlations, and insights related to diseases, thereby aiding the interpretable clinical decision making and applications, namely intelligent medicine. Therefore, there is a pressing need to integrate multidimensional data for identification of molecular subtypes, prediction of cancer progression and aggressiveness, along with perosonalized treatment performing. In this review, we systematically elaborated the landscape from molecular mechanism discovery of prostate cancer to clinical translational applications. We discussed the molecular profiles and clinical manifestations of prostate cancer heterogeneity, the identification of different states of prostate cancer, as well as corresponding precision medicine practices. Taking multi-omics fusion, systems genetics, and intelligence medicine as the main perspectives, the current research results and knowledge-driven research path of prostate cancer were summarized.

Proteogenomics in Cancer: Then and Now

For years, the paths of sequencing technologies and mass spectrometry have occurred in isolation, with each developing its own unique culture and expertise. These two technologies are crucial for inspecting complementary aspects of the molecular phenotype across the central dogma. Integrative multiomics strives to bridge the analysis gap among different fields to complete more comprehensive mechanisms of life events and diseases. Proteogenomics is one integrated multiomics field. Here in this review, we mainly summarize and discuss three aspects: workflow of proteogenomics, proteogenomics applications in cancer research, and the SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis of proteogenomics in cancer research. In conclusion, proteogenomics has a promising future as it clarifies the functional consequences of many unannotated genomic abnormalities or noncanonical variants and identifies driver genes and novel therapeutic targets across cancers, which would substantially accelerate the development of precision oncology.

Mass spectrometry-based targeted proteomics for analysis of protein mutations

Cancers are caused by accumulated DNA mutations. This recognition of the central role of mutations in cancer and recent advances in next-generation sequencing, has initiated the massive screening of clinical samples and the identification of 1000s of cancer-associated gene mutations. However, proteomic analysis of the expressed mutation products lags far behind genomic (transcriptomic) analysis. With comprehensive global proteomics analysis, only a small percentage of single nucleotide variants detected by DNA and RNA sequencing have been observed as single amino acid variants due to current technical limitations. Proteomic analysis of mutations is important with the potential to advance cancer biomarker development and the discovery of new therapeutic targets for more effective disease treatment. Targeted proteomics using selected reaction monitoring (also known as multiple reaction monitoring) and parallel reaction monitoring, has emerged as a powerful tool with significant advantages over global proteomics for analysis of protein mutations in terms of detection sensitivity, quantitation accuracy and overall practicality (e.g., reliable identification and the scale of quantification). Herein we review recent advances in the targeted proteomics technology for enhancing detection sensitivity and multiplexing capability and highlight its broad biomedical applications for analysis of protein mutations in human bodily fluids, tissues, and cell lines. Furthermore, we review recent applications of top-down proteomics for analysis of protein mutations. Unlike the commonly used bottom-up proteomics which requires digestion of proteins into peptides, top-down proteomics directly analyzes intact proteins for more precise characterization of mutation isoforms. Finally, general perspectives on the potential of achieving both high sensitivity and high sample throughput for large-scale targeted detection and quantification of important protein mutations are discussed.

Progress in Targeted Mass Spectrometry (Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation) and Its Application in Plasma/Serum Proteomics

Targeted mass spectrometry using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) or parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) has been commonly used for protein biomarker validation in plasma, serum, or other clinically relevant specimens due to its high specificity, selectivity, and multiplexing capability compared with immunoassays. As the emerging mode termed parallel accumulation-serial fragmentation (prmPASEF) significantly improved analyte throughput (100-1000), sensitivity (attomole level), and acquisition speed, it promises to broaden the application of targeted mass spectrometry to simultaneous biomarker discovery and validation with high accuracy. Here, we summarize the general approach of the MRM and PRM techniques used for serum/plasma proteomics and describe a detailed step-by-step procedure for the development of MRM/PRM assays for secreted proteins.

Prognostic implication of heterogeneity and trajectory progression induced by enzalutamide in prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Enzalutamide, as a second-generation endocrine therapy drug for prostate cancer (PCa), is prominent representative among the synthetic androgen receptor antagonists. Currently, there is lack of enzalutamide-induced signature (ENZ-sig) for predicting progression and relapse-free survival (RFS) in PCa.

METHODS

Enzalutamide-induced candidate markers were derived from single-cell RNA sequencing analysis integrating three enzalutamide-stimulated models (0-, 48-, and 168-h enzalutamide stimulation). ENZ-sig was constructed on the basis of candidate genes that were associated with RFS in The Cancer Genome Atlas leveraging least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. The ENZ-sig was further validated in GSE70768, GSE94767, E-MTAB-6128, DFKZ, GSE21034, and GSE70769 datasets. Biological enrichment analysis was used to discover the underlying mechanism between high ENZ-sig and low ENZ-sig in single-cell RNA sequencing and bulk RNA sequencing.

RESULTS

We identified a heterogenous subgroup that induced by enzalutamide stimulation and found 53 enzalutamide-induced candidate markers that are related to trajectory progression and enzalutamide-stimulated. The candidate genes were further narrowed down into 10 genes that are related to RFS in PCa. A 10-gene prognostic model (ENZ-sig)-IFRD1, COL5A2, TUBA1A, CFAP69, TMEM388, ACPP, MANEA, FOSB, SH3BGRL, and ST7-was constructed for the prediction of RFS in PCa. The effective and robust predictability of ENZ-sig was verified in six independent datasets. Biological enrichment analysis revealed that differentially expressed genes in high ENZ-sig were more activated in cell cycle-related pathway. High-ENZ-sig patients were more sensitive to cell cycle-targeted drugs (MK-1775, AZD7762, and MK-8776) than low-ENZ-sig patients in PCa.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provided evidence and insight on the potential utility of ENZ-sig in PCa prognosis and combination therapy strategy of enzalutamide and cell cycle-targeted compounds in treating PCa.

Prostate cancer in omics era

Recent advances in omics technology have prompted extraordinary attempts to define the molecular changes underlying the onset and progression of a variety of complex human diseases, including cancer. Since the advent of sequencing technology, cancer biology has become increasingly reliant on the generation and integration of data generated at these levels. The availability of multi-omic data has transformed medicine and biology by enabling integrated systems-level approaches. Multivariate signatures are expected to play a role in cancer detection, screening, patient classification, assessment of treatment response, and biomarker identification. This review reports current findings and highlights a number of studies that are both novel and groundbreaking in their application of multi Omics to prostate cancer.

From Omics to Multi-Omics Approaches for In-Depth Analysis of the Molecular Mechanisms of Prostate Cancer

Cancer arises following alterations at different cellular levels, including genetic and epigenetic modifications, transcription and translation dysregulation, as well as metabolic variations. High-throughput omics technologies that allow one to identify and quantify processes involved in these changes are now available and have been instrumental in generating a wealth of steadily increasing data from patient tumors, liquid biopsies, and from tumor models. Extensive investigation and integration of these data have led to new biological insights into the origin and development of multiple cancer types and helped to unravel the molecular networks underlying this complex pathology. The comprehensive and quantitative analysis of a molecule class in a biological sample is named omics and large-scale omics studies addressing different prostate cancer stages have been performed in recent years. Prostate tumors represent the second leading cancer type and a prevalent cause of cancer death in men worldwide. It is a very heterogenous disease so that evaluating inter- and intra-tumor differences will be essential for a precise insight into disease development and plasticity, but also for the development of personalized therapies. There is ample evidence for the key role of the androgen receptor, a steroid hormone-activated transcription factor, in driving early and late stages of the disease, and this led to the development and approval of drugs addressing diverse targets along this pathway. Early genomic and transcriptomic studies have allowed one to determine the genes involved in prostate cancer and regulated by androgen signaling or other tumor-relevant signaling pathways. More recently, they have been supplemented by epigenomic, cistromic, proteomic and metabolomic analyses, thus, increasing our knowledge on the intricate mechanisms involved, the various levels of regulation and their interplay. The comprehensive investigation of these omics approaches and their integration into multi-omics analyses have led to a much deeper understanding of the molecular pathways involved in prostate cancer progression, and in response and resistance to therapies. This brings the hope that novel vulnerabilities will be identified, that existing therapies will be more beneficial by targeting the patient population likely to respond best, and that bespoke treatments with increased efficacy will be available soon.

Application of Proteogenomics to Urine Analysis towards the Identification of Novel Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: An Exploratory Study

Simple Summary

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common cancers. Due to the limited and invasive approaches for PCa diagnosis, it is crucial to identify more accurate and non-invasive biomarkers for its detection. The aim of our study was to non-invasively uncover new protein targets for detecting PCa using a proteomics and proteogenomics approach. This work identified several dysregulated mutant protein isoforms in urine from PCa patients, some of them predicted to have a protective or an adverse role in these patients. These results are promising given urine’s non-invasive nature and offers an auspicious opportunity for research and development of PCa biomarkers.

Abstract

To identify new protein targets for PCa detection, first, a shotgun discovery experiment was performed to characterize the urinary proteome of PCa patients. This revealed 18 differentially abundant urinary proteins in PCa patients. Second, selected targets were clinically tested by immunoblot, and the soluble E-cadherin fragment was detected for the first time in the urine of PCa patients. Third, the proteogenome landscape of these PCa patients was characterized, revealing 1665 mutant protein isoforms. Statistical analysis revealed 6 differentially abundant mutant protein isoforms in PCa patients. Analysis of the likely effects of mutations on protein function and PPIs involving the dysregulated mutant protein isoforms suggests a protective role of mutations HSPG2*Q1062H and VASN*R161Q and an adverse role of AMBP*A286G and CD55*S162L in PCa patients. This work originally characterized the urinary proteome, focusing on the proteogenome profile of PCa patients, which is usually overlooked in the analysis of PCa and body fluids. Combined analysis of mass spectrometry data using two different software packages was performed for the first time in the context of PCa, which increased the robustness of the data analysis. The application of proteogenomics to urine proteomic analysis can be very enriching in mutation-related diseases such as cancer.

Improving the detection of aggressive prostate cancer using immunohistochemical staining of protein marker panels

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous group of tumors, including non-aggressive (NAG) and aggressive (AG) cancer, with variable clinical outcomes. Clinically, in order to assess the aggressiveness of a PCa, a core needle biopsy of a tumor is usually obtained to evaluate the Gleason pattern and score of the tumor. However, it may be difficult to assign on a small biopsy sample using histology. Therefore, additional tool is needed to aid in the assessment. We studied the diagnostic utility of 12 protein markers to identify AG tumors using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and tumor tissue microarray (TMA), including 215 cores of PCa and 111 cores of tumor-matched normal adjacent tissue (NAT). Protein markers were evaluated for their potential utility as single or combined panels for identification of AG. Of 12 proteins, PSMA, phospho-EGFR, AR and P16 were over-expressed in AG. Galectin-3, DPP4 and MAN1B1 revealed stronger staining patterns in NAG. The sensitivity and specificity of individual marker varied widely. Based on AUC values of individual marker, we constructed two- and three-marker panels. In two-marker panels, especially in the panel of DPP4 and PSMA, the AUC value reached 0.83 (ranging from 0.76 to 0.83). In three-marker panels, containing both DPP4 and PSMA with either Galectin-3 or phospho-EGFR, the AUC value reached 0.86 (ranging from 0.83 to 0.86). The specificities at 95% sensitivity of three-marker panels were also significantly improved. In addition to Gleason score, our IHC panels provide a practical tool to assess the aggressiveness of PCa.

Proteomic Landscape of Prostate Cancer: The View Provided by Quantitative Proteomics, Integrative Analyses, and Protein Interactomes

Prostate cancer is the second most frequent cancer of men worldwide. While the genetic landscapes and heterogeneity of prostate cancer are relatively well-known already, methodological developments now allow for studying basic and dynamic proteomes on a large scale and in a quantitative fashion. This aids in revealing the functional output of cancer genomes. It has become evident that not all aberrations at the genetic and transcriptional level are translated to the proteome. In addition, the proteomic level contains heterogeneity, which increases as the cancer progresses from primary prostate cancer (PCa) to metastatic and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). While multiple aspects of prostate adenocarcinoma proteomes have been studied, less is known about proteomes of neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). In this review, we summarize recent developments in prostate cancer proteomics, concentrating on the proteomic landscapes of clinical prostate cancer, cell line and mouse model proteomes interrogating prostate cancer-relevant signaling and alterations, and key prostate cancer regulator interactomes, such as those of the androgen receptor (AR). Compared to genomic and transcriptomic analyses, the view provided by proteomics brings forward changes in prostate cancer metabolism, post-transcriptional RNA regulation, and post-translational protein regulatory pathways, requiring the full attention of studies in the future.

Proteomic characterization of primary and metastatic prostate cancer reveals reduced proteinase activity in aggressive tumors

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a heterogeneous group of tumors with variable clinical courses. In order to improve patient outcomes, it is critical to clinically separate aggressive PCa (AG) from non-aggressive PCa (NAG). Although recent genomic studies have identified a spectrum of molecular abnormalities associated with aggressive PCa, it is still challenging to separate AG from NAG. To better understand the functional consequences of PCa progression and the unique features of the AG subtype, we studied the proteomic signatures of primary AG, NAG and metastatic PCa. 39 PCa and 10 benign prostate controls in a discovery cohort and 57 PCa in a validation cohort were analyzed using a data-independent acquisition (DIA) SWATH-MS platform. Proteins with the highest variances (top 500 proteins) were annotated for the pathway enrichment analysis. Functional analysis of differentially expressed proteins in NAG and AG was performed. Data was further validated using a validation cohort; and was also compared with a TCGA mRNA expression dataset and confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using PCa tissue microarray (TMA). 4,415 proteins were identified in the tumor and benign control tissues, including 158 up-regulated and 116 down-regulated proteins in AG tumors. A functional analysis of tumor-associated proteins revealed reduced expressions of several proteinases, including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), carboxypeptidase E (CPE) and prostate specific antigen (KLK3) in AG and metastatic PCa. A targeted analysis further identified that the reduced expression of DPP4 was associated with the accumulation of DPP4 substrates and the reduced ratio of DPP4 cleaved peptide to intact substrate peptide. Findings were further validated using an independently-collected tumor cohort, correlated with a TCGA mRNA dataset, and confirmed by immunohistochemical stains of PCa tumor microarray (TMA). Our study is the first large-scale proteomics analysis of PCa tissue using a DIA SWATH-MS platform. It provides not only an interrogative proteomic signature of PCa subtypes, but also indicates the critical roles played by certain proteinases during tumor progression. The spectrum map and protein profile generated in the study can be used to investigate potential biological mechanisms involved in PCa and for the development of a clinical assay to distinguish aggressive from indolent PCa.

The Multifaceted Role of Aldehyde Dehydrogenases in Prostate Cancer Stem Cells

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are the only tumor cells possessing self-renewal and differentiation properties, making them an engine of tumor progression and a source of tumor regrowth after treatment. Conventional therapies eliminate most non-CSCs, while CSCs often remain radiation and drug resistant, leading to tumor relapse and metastases. Thus, targeting CSCs might be a powerful tool to overcome tumor resistance and increase the efficiency of current cancer treatment strategies. The identification and isolation of the CSC population based on its high aldehyde dehydrogenase activity (ALDH) is widely accepted for prostate cancer (PCa) and many other solid tumors. In PCa, several ALDH genes contribute to the ALDH activity, which can be measured in the enzymatic assay by converting 4, 4-difluoro-4-bora-3a, 4a-diaza-s-indacene (BODIPY) aminoacetaldehyde (BAAA) into the fluorescent product BODIPY-aminoacetate (BAA). Although each ALDH isoform plays an individual role in PCa biology, their mutual functional interplay also contributes to PCa progression. Thus, ALDH proteins are markers and functional regulators of CSC properties, representing an attractive target for cancer treatment. In this review, we discuss the current state of research regarding the role of individual ALDH isoforms in PCa development and progression, their possible therapeutic targeting, and provide an outlook for the future advances in this field.

Peptidomics and proteogenomics: background, challenges and future needs

INTRODUCTION

With available genomic data and related information, it is becoming possible to better highlight mutations or genomic alterations associated with a particular disease or disorder. The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has greatly advanced diagnostics, prognostics, and drug development.

AREAS COVERED

Peptidomics and proteogenomics are the two post-genomic technologies that enable the simultaneous study of peptides and proteins/transcripts/genes. Both technologies add a remarkably large amount of data to the pool of information on various peptides associated with gene mutations or genome remodeling. Literature search was performed in the PubMed database and is up to date.

EXPERT OPINION

This article lists various techniques used for peptidomic and proteogenomic analyses. It also explains various bioinformatics workflows developed to understand differentially expressed peptides/proteins and their role in disease pathogenesis. Their role in deciphering disease pathways, cancer research, and biomarker discovery using biofluids is highlighted. Finally, the challenges and future requirements to overcome the current limitations for their effective clinical use are also discussed.

Characterization of Novel Progression Factors in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Based on Global Comparative Proteome Analysis

Simple Summary

Here, we investigated prostate cancer (PCa) tissues at each stage of progression, from benign prostatic hyperplasia to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), based on quantitative proteomic technology, including tissues after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). In total, we identified 4768 proteins, and 4069 of them were quantified. We performed a systematic bioinformatics analysis of 865 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in the combined PCa tissues. We found 15 DEPs, including FOXA1 and HMGN1–3, as novel factors were significantly involved in the progression to CRPC after ADT in T3G3. All targets were verified to have increased levels of FOXA1 and HMGN1–3 in CRPC by immunoblotting and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The FOXA1 and HMGN1–3 proteins could be used as CRPC-related factors in clinical therapeutic agents.

Abstract

Identifying the biological change from hormone-naïve prostate cancer to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a major clinical challenge for developing therapeutic agents. Although the pathways that lead to CRPC are not fully completely understood, recent evidence demonstrates that androgen signaling is often maintained through varied mechanisms. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is used as a primary treatment for preventing the progression of prostate cancer (PCa). Here we investigated PCa tissues at each stage of progression, from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) to CRPC, based on quantitative proteomic technology, including tissues after ADT. In total, 4768 proteins were identified in this study, of which 4069 were quantified in the combined PCa tissues. Among the quantified proteins, 865 were differentially expressed proteins (21.2%). Based on the quantitative protein results, we performed systematic bioinformatics analysis and found that the levels of 15 proteins, including FOXA1 and HMGN1–3, increased among T3G3, T3GX, and CRPC, despite the ADT. Among all targets, we verified the increased levels of FOXA1 and HMGN1–3 in CRPC by immunoblotting and indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In summary, we discuss the changes in intracellular factors involved in the progression of CRPC PCa despite ADT. Moreover, we suggest that FOXA1 and HMGN1–3 proteins could be used as potential CRPC-related factors in clinical therapeutic agents.

Quantitative Comparative Proteomics Reveals Candidate Biomarkers for the Early Prediction of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Preliminary Study

AIM

To identify differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) in 1^st trimester maternal plasma between pregnant women at risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and uncomplicated controls.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

First-trimester plasma from five women who developed GDM and five from non-diabetic ones were analyzed using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation - labeled proteomics. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was further applied in an independent cohort of 25 GDM cases and 25 controls for verification.

RESULTS

Prenylcysteine oxidase 1 (PCYOX1), beta-ala-his dipeptidase (CNDP1), extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1), basement membrane-specific heparan sulfate proteoglycan core protein (HSPG2), thrombospondin-4 (TSP-4) demonstrated significant differences in expression between the two groups (p<0.05). DEPs are mainly associated with complement and coagulation cascades.

CONCLUSION

The reported plasma proteomic changes represent potential biomarkers for the early identification of women at risk for GDM. Future studies using larger and more diverse cohorts are necessary to assess the clinical utility of these findings.

An overview of advances in multi-omics analysis in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a deadly disease for men, and studies of all types of omics data are necessary to promote precision medicine. The maturity of sequencing technology, the improvements of computer processing power, and the progress achieved in omics analysis methods have improved research efficiency and saved research costs. The occurrence and development of PCa is due to multisystem and multilevel pathological changes. Although omics research at a single level is important, this approach often has limitations. In contrast, the combined analysis of multiple types of omics data can better analyze PCa changes as a whole, thus ensuring the validity of research results to the greatest extent. This paper introduces the applications of single omics in PCa and then summarizes research progress in the combined analysis of two or more types of omics data, so as to systematically and comprehensively analyze the necessity of combined analysis of multiple omics data in PCa.