1
|
Daniels K, Vonck S, Robijns J, Spooren A, Hansen D, Bonnechère B. Characterising physical activity patterns in community-dwelling older adults using digital phenotyping: a 2-week observational study protocol. BMJ Open 2025; 15:e095769. [PMID: 40413040 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Physical activity (PA) is crucial for older adults' well-being and mitigating health risks. Encouraging active lifestyles requires a deeper understanding of the factors influencing PA, which conventional approaches often overlook by assuming stability in these determinants over time. However, individual-level determinants fluctuate over time in real-world settings. Digital phenotyping (DP), employing data from personal digital devices, enables continuous, real-time quantification of behaviour in natural settings. This approach offers ecological and dynamic assessments into factors shaping individual PA patterns within their real-world context. This paper presents a study protocol for the DP of PA behaviour among community-dwelling older adults aged 65 years and above. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This 2-week multidimensional assessment combines supervised (self-reported questionnaires, clinical assessments) and unsupervised methods (continuous wearable monitoring and ecological momentary assessment (EMA)). Participants will wear a Garmin Vivosmart V.5 watch, capturing 24/7 data on PA intensity, step count and heart rate. EMA will deliver randomised prompts four times a day via the Smartphone Ecological Momentary Assessment3 application, collecting real-time self-reports on physical and mental health, motivation, efficacy and contextual factors. All measurements align with the Behaviour Change Wheel framework, assessing capability, opportunity and motivation. Machine learning will analyse data, employing unsupervised learning (eg, hierarchical clustering) to identify PA behaviour patterns and supervised learning (eg, recurrent neural networks) to predict behavioural influences. Temporal patterns in PA and EMA responses will be explored for intraday and interday variability, with follow-up durations optimised through random sliding window analysis, with statistical significance evaluated in RStudio at a threshold of 0.05. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has been approved by the ethical committee of Hasselt University (B1152023000011). The findings will be presented at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT06094374.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Daniels
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL-Healthcare, PXL University College, Hasselt, Belgium
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Sharona Vonck
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL-Healthcare, PXL University College, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Jolien Robijns
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL-Healthcare, PXL University College, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Annemie Spooren
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL-Healthcare, PXL University College, Hasselt, Belgium
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Dominique Hansen
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Bruno Bonnechère
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL-Healthcare, PXL University College, Hasselt, Belgium
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Technology-Supported and Data-Driven Rehabilitation, Data Sciences Institute, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mohd Johari NF, Mohamad Ali N, Mhd Salim MH, Abdullah NA. Factors driving the use of mobile health app: insights from a survey. Mhealth 2025; 11:12. [PMID: 40248757 PMCID: PMC12004308 DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-24-44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 12/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Mobile health (mHealth) offers easy accessibility to healthcare information and services, promoting positive behaviour change. However, user engagement to mHealth diminishes over time, resulting in significant dropout rates. This study aims to investigate the factors contributing to the discontinuation of mHealth use and examine how persuasive elements influence users' intention to continue using mHealth. It also seeks to identify the key motivators and barriers affecting mHealth engagement. Methods A survey was conducted to assess persuasive elements, motivators, and barriers related to mHealth usage. The survey included measures to evaluate users' perceived persuasiveness of mHealth, the factors influencing their intention to continue using it, and both the motivators and barriers to its sustained use. Results The analysis revealed that unobtrusiveness had the strongest positive correlation with the intention to continue using mHealth. Additionally, a positive association was found between users' perception of mHealth's persuasiveness and their intention to continue using it. The study also identified key motivators that encourage mHealth adoption and several barriers that hinder long-term engagement. Conclusions These findings highlight the importance of developing strategies to enhance the long-term adoption of mHealth solutions and reduce dropout rates. Future research is needed to explore effective interventions for sustaining mHealth usage and addressing the barriers that lead to disengagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nur Farahin Mohd Johari
- Institute of Visual Informatics, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
- College of Computing, Informatics and Mathematics, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Melaka Branch, Melaka, Malaysia
| | - Nazlena Mohamad Ali
- Institute of Visual Informatics, The National University of Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
| | | | - Nor Aniza Abdullah
- Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geeraerts J, Pivodic L, Nooijer KD, Rosquin L, Naert E, Crombez G, De Ridder M, Van den Block L. The potential of experience sampling methods in palliative care. Palliat Med 2025; 39:307-317. [PMID: 39718021 DOI: 10.1177/02692163241306242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experience sampling methods typically involve multiple self-report assessments per day over consecutive days. Unlike traditional patient-reported outcome measures or interviews, such methods offer the possibility to capture the temporal fluctuations of experiences in daily environments, making them valuable for studying the daily lives of people with advanced illness. Yet, their use in palliative care research is limited. AIMS To introduce experience sampling methods to the field of palliative care as a valuable tool for studying the everyday experiences of people with advanced illness, and to present the findings of an experience sampling methods pilot study with people with advanced breast or advanced lung cancer. EVIDENCE USED TO SUPPORT THE INFORMATION PRESENTED We draw on published health research using experience sampling methods. We present a newly developed experience sampling methods questionnaire (ESM-AC) and report pilot study findings on the feasibility and acceptability of experience sampling methods among people with advanced breast or lung cancer. KEY LEARNING POINTS Experience sampling methods hold potential to uncover the dynamics of everyday experiences of people with advanced illness. The methods offer considerable flexibility and options to answer a variety of research questions, but consideration is required regarding sampling protocols and participant burden. We showed appropriate feasibility and acceptable participant burden of the methods among people with advanced breast or advanced lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joran Geeraerts
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lara Pivodic
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kim de Nooijer
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lise Rosquin
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Eline Naert
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Geert Crombez
- Department of Experimental-Health Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Mark De Ridder
- Department of Radiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Daniels K, Quadflieg K, Robijns J, De Vry J, Van Alphen H, Van Beers R, Sourbron B, Vanbuel A, Meekers S, Mattheeussen M, Spooren A, Hansen D, Bonnechère B. From Steps to Context: Optimizing Digital Phenotyping for Physical Activity Monitoring in Older Adults by Integrating Wearable Data and Ecological Momentary Assessment. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2025; 25:858. [PMID: 39943497 PMCID: PMC11820068 DOI: 10.3390/s25030858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2024] [Revised: 01/24/2025] [Accepted: 01/28/2025] [Indexed: 02/16/2025]
Abstract
Physical activity (PA) is essential for healthy aging, but its accurate assessment in older adults remains challenging due to the limitations and biases of traditional clinical assessment. Mobile technologies and wearable sensors offer a more ecological, less biased alternative for evaluating PA in this population. This study aimed to optimize digital phenotyping strategies for assessing PA patterns in older adults, by integrating ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and continuous wearable sensor data collection. Over two weeks, 108 community-dwelling older adults provided real-time EMA responses while their PA was continuously monitored using Garmin Vivo 5 sensors. The combined approach proved feasible, with 67.2% adherence to EMA prompts, consistent across time points (morning: 68.1%; evening: 65.4%). PA predominantly occurred at low (51.4%) and moderate (46.2%) intensities, with midday activity peaks. Motivation and self-efficacy were significantly associated with low-intensity PA (R = 0.20 and 0.14 respectively), particularly in the morning. However, discrepancies between objective step counts and self-reported PA measures, which showed no correlation (R = -0.026, p = 0.65), highlight the complementary value of subjective and objective data sources. These findings support integrating EMA, wearable sensors, and temporal frameworks to enhance PA assessment, offering precise insights for personalized, time-sensitive interventions to promote PA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Daniels
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium; (K.Q.); (J.R.); (H.V.A.); (A.S.); (B.B.)
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Kirsten Quadflieg
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium; (K.Q.); (J.R.); (H.V.A.); (A.S.); (B.B.)
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Jolien Robijns
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium; (K.Q.); (J.R.); (H.V.A.); (A.S.); (B.B.)
| | - Jochen De Vry
- PXL Research, Centre of Expertise in Smart-ICT, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium;
| | - Hans Van Alphen
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium; (K.Q.); (J.R.); (H.V.A.); (A.S.); (B.B.)
| | - Robbe Van Beers
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Britt Sourbron
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Anaïs Vanbuel
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Siebe Meekers
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Marlies Mattheeussen
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Annemie Spooren
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium; (K.Q.); (J.R.); (H.V.A.); (A.S.); (B.B.)
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
| | - Dominique Hansen
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
- BIOMED Biomedical Research Instititute, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Bruno Bonnechère
- Centre of Expertise in Care Innovation, Department of PXL—Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium; (K.Q.); (J.R.); (H.V.A.); (A.S.); (B.B.)
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; (R.V.B.); (B.S.); (A.V.); (S.M.); (M.M.); (D.H.)
- Technology-Supported and Data-Driven Rehabilitation, Data Sciences Institute, Hasselt University, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim SK, Park SY, Hwang HR, Moon SH, Park JW. Effectiveness of Mobile Health Intervention in Medication Adherence: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Syst 2025; 49:13. [PMID: 39821698 DOI: 10.1007/s10916-024-02135-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2025]
Abstract
Low medication adherence poses a great risk of poor treatment outcomes among patients with chronic diseases. Recently, mobile applications (apps) have been recognized as effective interventions, enabling patients to adhere to their prescriptions. This study aimed to establish the effectiveness of mobile app interventions for medication adherence, affecting features, and dropout rates by focusing on previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of mobile app interventions targeting medication adherence in patients with chronic diseases. Electronic searches of eight databases were conducted on April 21, 2023, for studies published between 2013 and 2023. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to estimate the standardized mean difference (SMD) of pooled outcomes, odds ratios (ORs), and confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis was applied to investigate and compare the effectiveness of the interventional strategies and their features. The risk of bias of the included RCTs was evaluated by applying the risk of bias tool. Publication bias was examined using the fail-safe N method. Twenty-six studies with 5,174 participants were included (experimental group 2603, control group 2571). The meta-analysis findings showed a positive impact of mobile apps on improving medication adherence (OR = 2.371, SMD = 0.279). The subgroup analysis results revealed greater effectiveness of interventions using interactive strategies (OR = 2.652, SMD = 0.283), advanced reminders (OR = 1.849, SMD = 0.455), data-sharing (OR = 2.404, SMD = 0.346), and pill dispensers (OR = 2.453). The current study found that mobile interventions had significant effects on improving medication adherence. Subgroup analysis showed that the roles of stakeholders in health providers' interactions with patients and developers' understanding of patients and disease characteristics are critical. Future studies should incorporate advanced technology reflecting acceptability and the needs of the target population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Kyung Kim
- Department of Nursing and Department of Biomedicine, Health & Life Convergence Sciences, BK21 Four, Mokpo National University, Muan, Jeonnam, 58554, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Yeon Park
- Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Muan, Jeonnam, 58554, Republic of Korea.
| | - Hye Ri Hwang
- Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Muan, Jeonnam, 58554, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Hee Moon
- Department of Nursing, Mokpo National University, Muan, Jeonnam, 58554, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin Woo Park
- Department of Biomedicine, Health & Life Convergence Sciences, BK21 Four,and Biomedicine Cutting Edge Formulation Technology Center, Mokpo National University, Muan, Jeonnam, 58554, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yamada Y, Okuda T, Uchida T, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S. Monitoring reaction time to digital device in the very-old to detect early cognitive decline. NPJ AGING 2024; 10:40. [PMID: 39242589 PMCID: PMC11379679 DOI: 10.1038/s41514-024-00167-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/15/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Early detection of cognitive decline is essential for timely intervention and effective management of age-related impairments. We monitored repetitive reaction times to a simple task on senior-friendly tablet computers among 72 functionally independent older adults, with a mean age of 82, ranging up to 100 years, within natural settings over two years. Functional principal component analyses revealed a consistent decrease in reaction time in line with their task experience among those without subjective cognitive decline. Conversely, individuals reporting subjective cognitive decline showed no consistent trend and exhibited wide variability over time. These distinctive reaction time trajectories in very old adults suggest the potential for monitoring as a non-invasive, convenient method for early detection of cognitive impairment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukari Yamada
- Health Data Implementation Science, Fukuma Research Group, Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tadahisa Okuda
- Health Data Implementation Science, Fukuma Research Group, Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Health Data Science, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoe Uchida
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Health Informatics, School of Public Health, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Tatsuyoshi Ikenoue
- Health Data Implementation Science, Fukuma Research Group, Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
- Data Science and AI Innovation Research Promotion Center, Shiga University, Shiga, Japan
| | - Shingo Fukuma
- Health Data Implementation Science, Fukuma Research Group, Human Health Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
- Department of Epidemiology Infectious Disease Control and Prevention, Hiroshima University Graduate school of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen Y, Turkson-Ocran RA, Koirala B, Davidson PM, Commodore-Mensah Y, Himmelfarb CD. Association Between the Composite Cardiovascular Risk and mHealth Use Among Adults in the 2017-2020 Health Information National Trends Survey: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e46277. [PMID: 38175685 PMCID: PMC10797506 DOI: 10.2196/46277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have suggested that the relationship between cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk and the usage of mobile health (mHealth) technology may vary depending on the total number of CVD risk factors present. However, whether higher CVD risk is associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in specific mHealth use among US adults is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE We aim to assess the associations between the composite CVD risk and each component of mHealth use among US adults regardless of whether they have a history of CVD or not. METHODS This study used cross-sectional data from the 2017 to 2020 Health Information National Trends Survey. The exposure was CVD risk (diabetes, hypertension, smoking, physical inactivity, and overweight or obesity). We defined low, moderate, and high CVD risk as having 0-1, 2-3, and 4-5 CVD risk factors, respectively. The outcome variables of interest were each component of mHealth use, including using mHealth to make health decisions, track health progress, share health information, and discuss health decisions with health providers. We used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between CVD risk and mHealth use adjusted for demographic factors. RESULTS We included 10,531 adults, with a mean age of 54 (SD 16.2) years. Among the included participants, 50.2% were men, 65.4% were non-Hispanic White, 41.9% used mHealth to make health decisions, 50.8% used mHealth to track health progress toward a health-related goal, 18.3% used mHealth to share health information with health providers, and 37.7% used mHealth to discuss health decisions with health providers (all are weighted percentages). Adults with moderate CVD risk were more likely to use mHealth to share health information with health providers (adjusted odds ratio 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.80) and discuss health decisions with health providers (1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.44) compared to those with low CVD risk. Similarly, having high CVD risk was associated with higher odds of using mHealth to share health information with health providers (2.61, 95% CI 1.93-3.54) and discuss health decisions with health providers (1.56, 95% CI 1.17-2.10) compared to those with low CVD risk. Upon stratifying by age and gender, we observed age and gender disparities in the relationship between CVD risk and the usage of mHealth to discuss health decisions with health providers. CONCLUSIONS Adults with a greater number of CVD risk factors were more likely to use mHealth to share health information with health providers and discuss health decisions with health providers. These findings suggest a promising avenue for enhancing health care communication and advancing both primary and secondary prevention efforts related to managing CVD risk factors through the effective usage of mHealth technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuling Chen
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | | | - Binu Koirala
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Patricia M Davidson
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States
- University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Yvonne Commodore-Mensah
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb
- Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Umoh E, Isiguzo C, Akwaowo C, Attai K, Ekpenyong N, Sabi H, Dan E, Obinna N, Uzoka FM. Lessons learned on data collection for a digital health intervention-insights and challenges from Nigeria. SAGE Open Med 2023; 11:20503121231216855. [PMID: 38116299 PMCID: PMC10729616 DOI: 10.1177/20503121231216855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives This article delves into the challenges of medical data collection during the COVID-19 pandemic in developing countries, using Nigeria as a case study. It emphasizes how data collection impacts research quality, reliability, and validity. Methods Qualitative research utilizing purposive sampling was employed to explore experiences in designing a diagnostic tool for febrile diseases in Nigeria. A questionnaire with selectable and open-ended questions was utilized for data collection, and 23 respondents participated. Results Among 74 potential participants, 23 valid responses were gathered, revealing significant themes related to experiences and challenges in medical data collection. A multidisciplinary team approach proved beneficial, fostering collaboration, enhancing knowledge, and promoting positive experiences. Despite challenges with paper questionnaires, most participants preferred them for ease of use. Connectivity issues hindered timely data uploading and disrupted virtual meetings. Conclusion Innovative and flexible strategies, such as a blended data collection approach and well-coordinated teams, were vital in overcoming challenges. Electronic data collection tools, reminders, and effective communication played key roles, leading to positive outcomes. This study provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners involved in data collection, particularly in developing countries like Nigeria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edidiong Umoh
- Department of Fisheries and Aquatic Environmental Management, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Uyo, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria
| | - Chimaobi Isiguzo
- Department of Surgery, Federal Medical Centre Owerri, Owerri, Nigeria
| | - Christie Akwaowo
- Community Health Department, University of Uyo, University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria
| | - Kingsley Attai
- Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Ritman University, Ikot Ekpene, Nigeria
| | - Nnette Ekpenyong
- Community Health Department, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria
| | - Humphrey Sabi
- ICT Department, The ICT University, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Emem Dan
- University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria
| | - Nwokoro Obinna
- Department of Computer Science, University of Uyo, Uyo, Nigeria
| | - Faith-Michael Uzoka
- Department of Mathematics and Computing, Mount Royal University, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Fowe IE, Sanders EC, Boot WR. Understanding Barriers to the Collection of Mobile and Wearable Device Data to Monitor Health and Cognition in Older Adults: A Scoping Review. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE PROCEEDINGS. AMIA JOINT SUMMITS ON TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2023; 2023:186-195. [PMID: 37350920 PMCID: PMC10283138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Advances in technology have made continuous/remote monitoring of digital health data possible, which can enable the early detection and treatment of age-related cognitive and health declines. Using Arksey and O'Malley's methodology, this scoping review evaluated potential barriers to the collection of mobile and wearable device data to monitor health and cognitive status in older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Selected articles were US based and focused on experienced or perceived barriers to the collection of mobile and wearable device data by adults 55 years of age or older. Fourteen articles met the study's inclusion criteria. Identified themes included barriers related to usability, users' prior experiences with health technologies, first and second level digital divide, aesthetics, comfort, adherence, and attitudinal barriers. Addressing these barriers will be crucial for effective digital data-collection among older adults to achieve goals of improving quality of life and reducing care costs.
Collapse
|
10
|
Fortuna KL, Kadakia A, Cosco TD, Rotondi A, Nicholson J, Mois G, Myers AL, Hamilton J, Brewer LC, Collins-Pisano C, Barr P, Hudson MF, Joseph K, Mullaly C, Booth M, Lebby S, Walker R. Guidelines to Establish an Equitable Mobile Health Ecosystem. Psychiatr Serv 2023; 74:393-400. [PMID: 36377370 PMCID: PMC11398716 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202200011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth)-that is, use of mobile devices, such as mobile phones, monitoring devices, personal digital assistants, and other wireless devices, in medical care-is a promising approach to the provision of support services. mHealth may aid in facilitating monitoring of mental health conditions, offering peer support, providing psychoeducation (i.e., information about mental health conditions), and delivering evidence-based practices. However, some groups may fail to benefit from mHealth despite a high need for mental health services, including people from racially and ethnically disadvantaged groups, rural residents, individuals who are socioeconomically disadvantaged, and people with disabilities. A well-designed mHealth ecosystem that considers multiple elements of design, development, and implementation can afford disadvantaged populations the opportunity to address inequities and facilitate access to and uptake of mHealth. This article proposes inclusion of the following principles and standards in the development of an mHealth ecosystem of equity: use a human-centered design, reduce bias in machine-learning analytical techniques, promote inclusivity via mHealth design features, facilitate informed decision making in technology selection, embrace adaptive technology, promote digital literacy through mHealth by teaching patients how to use the technology, and facilitate access to mHealth to improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen L Fortuna
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Arya Kadakia
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Theodore D Cosco
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Armando Rotondi
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Joanne Nicholson
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - George Mois
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Amanda L Myers
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Jennifer Hamilton
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - LaPrincess C Brewer
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Caroline Collins-Pisano
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Paul Barr
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Matthew F Hudson
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Kalisa Joseph
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Christa Mullaly
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Mark Booth
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Stephanie Lebby
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| | - Robert Walker
- Department of Psychiatry (Fortuna) and Center for Technology and Behavioral Health (Barr), Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire; BRITE Center, University of Washington, Seattle (Kadakia); Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, and Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford (Cosco); Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Department of Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Health Care System, and Center for Behavioral Health, Media, and Technology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Rotondi); Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts (Nicholson, Myers); School of Social Work, University of Illinois, Urbana (Mois); College of Applied Health Sciences Human Factors and Aging Laboratory, University of Illinois, Champaign (Mois); College of Social Work, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Hamilton); Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, and Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Brewer); Psychology Department, University of Colorado, Colorado Springs (Collins-Pisano); Department of Medicine, University of South Carolina School of Medicine, and Prisma Health, Greenville (Hudson); Centre for Mental Health, University of Rwanda, Kigali (Joseph); Psychiatric Rehabilitation Division, Vinfen, Cambridge, Massachusetts (Mullaly); Clarity Health, Nashua, New Hampshire (Booth); College of Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington (Lebby); Office of Recovery and Empowerment, Massachusetts Department of Mental Health, Boston (Walker)
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wilczewski H, Soni H, Ivanova J, Ong T, Barrera JF, Bunnell BE, Welch BM. Older adults' experience with virtual conversational agents for health data collection. Front Digit Health 2023; 5:1125926. [PMID: 37006821 PMCID: PMC10050579 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1125926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Virtual conversational agents (i.e., chatbots) are an intuitive form of data collection. Understanding older adults' experiences with chatbots could help identify their usability needs. This quality improvement study evaluated older adults' experiences with a chatbot for health data collection. A secondary goal was to understand how perceptions differed based on length of chatbot forms. Methods After a demographic survey, participants (≥60 years) completed either a short (21 questions), moderate (30 questions), or long (66 questions) chatbot form. Perceived ease-of-use, usefulness, usability, likelihood to recommend, and cognitive load were measured post-test. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were used. Results A total of 260 participants reported on usability and satisfaction metrics including perceived ease-of-use (5.8/7), usefulness (4.7/7), usability (5.4/7), and likelihood to recommend (Net Promoter Score = 0). Cognitive load (12.3/100) was low. There was a statistically significant difference in perceived usefulness between groups, with a significantly higher mean perceived usefulness for Group 1 than Group 3. No other group differences were observed. The chatbot was perceived as quick, easy, and pleasant with concerns about technical issues, privacy, and security. Participants provided suggestions to enhance progress tracking, edit responses, improve readability, and have options to ask questions. Discussion Older adults found the chatbot to be easy, useful, and usable. The chatbot required low cognitive load demonstrating it could be an enjoyable health data collection tool for older adults. These results will inform the development of a health data collection chatbot technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hiral Soni
- Doxy.me Research, Doxy.me Inc., Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Julia Ivanova
- Doxy.me Research, Doxy.me Inc., Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Triton Ong
- Doxy.me Research, Doxy.me Inc., Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Janelle F. Barrera
- Doxy.me Research, Doxy.me Inc., Rochester, NY, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Brian E. Bunnell
- Doxy.me Research, Doxy.me Inc., Rochester, NY, United States
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Brandon M. Welch
- Doxy.me Research, Doxy.me Inc., Rochester, NY, United States
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jovanovic M, Mitrov G, Zdravevski E, Lameski P, Colantonio S, Kampel M, Tellioglu H, Florez-Revuelta F. Ambient Assisted Living: Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Models, Domains, Technology, and Concerns. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e36553. [PMID: 36331530 PMCID: PMC9675018 DOI: 10.2196/36553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ambient assisted living (AAL) is a common name for various artificial intelligence (AI)-infused applications and platforms that support their users in need in multiple activities, from health to daily living. These systems use different approaches to learn about their users and make automated decisions, known as AI models, for personalizing their services and increasing outcomes. Given the numerous systems developed and deployed for people with different needs, health conditions, and dispositions toward the technology, it is critical to obtain clear and comprehensive insights concerning AI models used, along with their domains, technology, and concerns, to identify promising directions for future work. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to provide a scoping review of the literature on AI models in AAL. In particular, we analyzed specific AI models used in AАL systems, the target domains of the models, the technology using the models, and the major concerns from the end-user perspective. Our goal was to consolidate research on this topic and inform end users, health care professionals and providers, researchers, and practitioners in developing, deploying, and evaluating future intelligent AAL systems. METHODS This study was conducted as a scoping review to identify, analyze, and extract the relevant literature. It used a natural language processing toolkit to retrieve the article corpus for an efficient and comprehensive automated literature search. Relevant articles were then extracted from the corpus and analyzed manually. This review included 5 digital libraries: IEEE, PubMed, Springer, Elsevier, and MDPI. RESULTS We included a total of 108 articles. The annual distribution of relevant articles showed a growing trend for all categories from January 2010 to July 2022. The AI models mainly used unsupervised and semisupervised approaches. The leading models are deep learning, natural language processing, instance-based learning, and clustering. Activity assistance and recognition were the most common target domains of the models. Ambient sensing, mobile technology, and robotic devices mainly implemented the models. Older adults were the primary beneficiaries, followed by patients and frail persons of various ages. Availability was a top beneficiary concern. CONCLUSIONS This study presents the analytical evidence of AI models in AAL and their domains, technologies, beneficiaries, and concerns. Future research on intelligent AAL should involve health care professionals and caregivers as designers and users, comply with health-related regulations, improve transparency and privacy, integrate with health care technological infrastructure, explain their decisions to the users, and establish evaluation metrics and design guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) CRD42022347590; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022347590.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mladjan Jovanovic
- Department of Computer Science, Singidunum University, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Goran Mitrov
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University Saints Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Eftim Zdravevski
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University Saints Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Petre Lameski
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, University Saints Cyril and Methodius, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - Sara Colantonio
- Signals & Images Lab, Institute of Information Science and Technologies, National Research Council of Italy, Pisa, Italy
| | - Martin Kampel
- Faculty of Informatics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hilda Tellioglu
- Faculty of Informatics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kamstra RJM, Boorsma A, Krone T, van Stokkum RM, Eggink HM, Peters T, Pasman WJ. Validation of the Mobile App Version of the EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire Against the Gold Standard Paper-Based Version: Randomized Crossover Study. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e37303. [PMID: 35969437 PMCID: PMC9412727 DOI: 10.2196/37303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Study participants and patients often perceive (long) questionnaires as burdensome. In addition, paper-based questionnaires are prone to errors such as (unintentionally) skipping questions or filling in a wrong type of answer. Such errors can be prevented with the emergence of mobile questionnaire apps. Objective This study aimed to validate an innovative way to measure the quality of life using a mobile app based on the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. This validation study compared the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire requested by a mobile app with the gold standard paper-based version of the EQ-5D-5L. Methods This was a randomized, crossover, and open study. The main criteria for participation were participants should be aged ≥18 years, healthy at their own discretion, in possession of a smartphone with at least Android version 4.1 or higher or iOS version 9 or higher, digitally skilled in downloading the mobile app, and able to read and answer questionnaires in Dutch. Participants were recruited by a market research company that divided them into 2 groups balanced for age, gender, and education. Each participant received a digital version of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire via a mobile app and the EQ-5D-5L paper-based questionnaire by postal mail. In the mobile app, participants received, for 5 consecutive days, 1 question in the morning and 1 question in the afternoon; as such, all questions were asked twice (at time point 1 [App T1] and time point 2 [App T2]). The primary outcomes were the correlations between the answers (scores) of each EQ-5D-5L question answered via the mobile app compared with the paper-based questionnaire to assess convergent validity. Results A total of 255 participants (healthy at their own discretion), 117 (45.9%) men and 138 (54.1%) women in the age range of 18 to 64 years, completed the study. To ensure randomization, the measured demographics were checked and compared between groups. To compare the results of the electronic and paper-based questionnaires, polychoric correlation analysis was performed. All questions showed a high correlation (0.64-0.92; P<.001) between the paper-based and the mobile app–based questions at App T1 and App T2. The scores and their variance remained similar over the questionnaires, indicating no clear difference in the answer tendency. In addition, the correlation between the 2 app-based questionnaires was high (>0.73; P<.001), illustrating a high test-retest reliability, indicating it to be a reliable replacement for the paper-based questionnaire. Conclusions This study indicates that the mobile app is a valid tool for measuring the quality of life and is as reliable as the paper-based version of the EQ-5D-5L, while reducing the response burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina J M Kamstra
- Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, Netherlands
| | - André Boorsma
- Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, Netherlands
| | - Tanja Krone
- Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Robin M van Stokkum
- Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Hannah M Eggink
- Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, Netherlands
| | | | - Wilrike J Pasman
- Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Zeist, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Carpenter CA, Ugwoaba UA, Cardel MI, Ross KM. Using self-monitoring technology for nutritional counseling and weight management. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076221102774. [PMID: 35663238 PMCID: PMC9158426 DOI: 10.1177/20552076221102774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Self-monitoring of weight, dietary intake, and physical activity is a key strategy for weight management in adults with obesity. Despite research suggesting consistent associations between more frequent self-monitoring and greater success with weight regulation, adherence is often suboptimal and tends to decrease over time. New technologies such as smartphone applications, e-scales, and wearable devices can help eliminate some of the barriers individuals experience with traditional self-monitoring tools, and research has demonstrated that these tools may improve self-monitoring adherence. To improve the integration of these tools in clinical practice, the current narrative review introduces the various types of self-monitoring technologies, presents current evidence regarding their use for nutrition support and weight management, and provides guidance for optimal implementation. The review ends with a discussion of barriers to the implementation of these technologies and the role that they should optimally play in nutritional counseling and weight management. Although newer self-monitoring technologies may help improve adherence to self-monitoring, these tools should not be viewed as an intervention in and of themselves and are most efficacious when implemented with ongoing clinical support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michelle I Cardel
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA,WW International, Inc, New York, NY
| | - Kathryn M Ross
- University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA,Kathryn M. Ross, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, PO Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Garnett A, Northwood M, Ting J, Sangrar R. Mobile Health Interventions to Support Caregivers of Older Adults: An Equity-Focused Systematic Review. JMIR Aging 2022; 5:e33085. [PMID: 35616514 PMCID: PMC9308083 DOI: 10.2196/33085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Informal caregivers, hereafter referred to as caregivers, provide support to older adults so that they can age safely at home. The decision to become a caregiver can be influenced by individual factors, such as personal choice, or societal factors such as social determinants of health, including household income, employment status, and culture-specific gender roles. Over time, caregivers’ health can be negatively affected by their caregiving roles. Although programs exist to support caregivers, the availability and appropriateness of services do not match caregivers’ expressed needs. Research suggests that supportive interventions offered through mobile health (mHealth) technologies have the potential to increase caregivers’ access to supportive services. However, a knowledge gap remains regarding the extent to which social determinants of health are considered in the design, implementation, and evaluation of mHealth interventions intended to support the caregivers of older adults. Objective This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to determine how health equity is considered in the design, implementation, and evaluation of mHealth interventions for caregivers of older adults using Cochrane Equity’s PROGRESS-Plus (place of residence, race, ethnicity, culture, language, occupation, gender, religion, education, social capital, socioeconomic status–plus age, disability, and sexual orientation) framework and synthesize evidence of the impacts of the identified caregiver-focused mHealth interventions. Methods A systematic review was conducted using 5 databases. Articles published between January 2010 and June 2021 were included if they evaluated or explored the impact of mHealth interventions on the health and well-being of informal caregivers of older adults. mHealth interventions were defined as supportive services, for example, education, that caregivers of older adults accessed via mobile or wireless devices. Results In total, 28 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The interventions evaluated sought to connect caregivers with services, facilitate caregiving, and promote caregivers’ health and well-being. The PROGRESS-Plus framework factors were mainly considered in the results, discussion, and limitations sections of the included studies. Some PROGRESS-Plus factors such as sexual orientation, religion, and occupation, received little to no consideration across any phase of the intervention design, implementation, or evaluation. Overall, the findings of this review suggest that mHealth interventions were positively received by study participants. Such interventions have the potential to reduce caregiver burden and positively affect caregivers’ physical and mental health while supporting them as caregivers. The study findings highlight the importance of making support available to help facilitate caregivers’ use of mHealth interventions, as well as in the use of appropriate language and text. Conclusions The successful uptake and spread of mHealth interventions to support caregivers of older adults will depend on creating opportunities for the inclusive involvement of a broad range of stakeholders at all stages of design, implementation, and evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Garnett
- Western University, FIMS Nursing Building, Rm 2306, London, CA
| | | | - Justine Ting
- Western University, FIMS Nursing Building, Rm 2306, London, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Buhr L, Kaufmann PLM, Jörß K. Chronic Heart Failure Patients’ Attitudes towards Digital Device Data for Self-Documentation and Research in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study (Preprint). JMIR Cardio 2021; 6:e34959. [PMID: 35921134 PMCID: PMC9386578 DOI: 10.2196/34959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Revised: 03/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In recent years, the use of digital mobile measurement devices (DMMDs) for self-documentation in cardiovascular care in Western industrialized health care systems has increased. For patients with chronic heart failure (cHF), digital self-documentation plays an increasingly important role in self-management. Data from DMMDs can also be integrated into telemonitoring programs or data-intensive medical research to collect and evaluate patient-reported outcome measures through data sharing. However, the implementation of data-intensive devices and data sharing poses several challenges for doctors and patients as well as for the ethical governance of data-driven medical research. Objective This study aims to explore the potential and challenges of digital device data in cardiology research from patients’ perspectives. Leading research questions of the study concerned the attitudes of patients with cHF toward health-related data collected in the use of digital devices for self-documentation as well as sharing these data and consenting to data sharing for research purposes. Methods A cross-sectional survey of patients of a research in cardiology was conducted at a German university medical center (N=159) in 2020 (March to July). Eligible participants were German-speaking adult patients with cHF at that center. A pen-and-pencil questionnaire was sent by mail. Results Most participants (77/105, 73.3%) approved digital documentation, as they expected the device data to help them observe their body and its functions more objectively. Digital device data were believed to provide cognitive support, both for patients’ self-assessment and doctors’ evaluation of their patients’ current health condition. Interestingly, positive attitudes toward DMMD data providing cognitive support were, in particular, voiced by older patients aged >65 years. However, approximately half of the participants (56/105, 53.3%) also reported difficulty in dealing with self-documented data that lay outside the optimal medical target range. Furthermore, our findings revealed preferences for the self-management of DMMD data disclosed for data-intensive medical research among German patients with cHF, which are best implemented with a dynamic consent model. Conclusions Our findings provide potentially valuable insights for introducing DMMD in cardiovascular research in the German context. They have several practical implications, such as a high divergence in attitudes among patients with cHF toward different data-receiving organizations as well as a large variance in preferences for the modes of receiving information included in the consenting procedure for data sharing for research. We suggest addressing patients’ multiple views on consenting and data sharing in institutional normative governance frameworks for data-intensive medical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorina Buhr
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- Faculty of Economics, Law and Social Sciences, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany
| | - Pauline Lucie Martiana Kaufmann
- Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katharina Jörß
- Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Rao N, Tighe EL, Feinberg I. The Dispersion of Health Information Seeking Behavior and Health Literacy in a State in the Southern United States: A Cross-Sectional Study (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2021; 6:e34708. [PMID: 35704357 PMCID: PMC9244650 DOI: 10.2196/34708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Objective Methods Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikita Rao
- Mark Chaffin Center for Healthy Development, School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Elizabeth L Tighe
- Deparment of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Iris Feinberg
- Adult Literacy Research Center, Department of Learning Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ghani M, Adler C, Yeung H. Patient Factors Associated with Interest in Teledermatology: Cross-sectional Survey. JMIR DERMATOLOGY 2021; 4:e21555. [PMID: 37625162 PMCID: PMC10501513 DOI: 10.2196/21555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Revised: 08/09/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Teledermatology is a conduit for patients communicating with dermatologists on the internet, which bypasses in-person visits. It holds promise to address access needs for dermatologic care; however, the interest in using teledermatology is unknown in underserved populations with potential barriers to the use of health care technology. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to characterize the association between demographic characteristics with interest in exchanging digital images or videos of skin lesions with health care providers electronically. METHODS We examined data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) 4 cycle 4 (2014) of the National Cancer Institute. HINTS is a cross-sectional, nationally representative household survey conducted annually, which collects information on demographics, perceptions and use of health information, and provides information on how cancer risks are perceived. HINTS 4 cycle 4 had a sample of 3677 participants. We examined the outcome to the question, "how interested are you in exchanging digital images or videos (eg, photos of skin lesions) with a health care provider electronically?" We dichotomized the outcome by a high level of interest (responding with "very") and those who did not have a high level of interest (responding with "somewhat," "a little," or "not at all") in exchanging images or videos. We used a multivariable logistic regression model developed through backwards selection, with all final covariates associated with varying levels of teledermatology use at P<.05. Sensitivity analysis was performed by changing the outcome dichotomy to model those who were "not at all" interested. Two-sided tests were performed with P<.05 considered significant. RESULTS Among 3447 respondents, 888 (weighted prevalence=26.2%) were "very" interested in participating in teledermatology. A higher interest in using teledermatology was associated with a younger age, higher educational attainment, higher household income, internet usage, type of mobile device ownership, history of electronic medical information exchange with a clinician within the past 12 months, and high level of trust in web-based information on cancer (for all, P<.01), but not with the female gender, race or ethnicity, health insurance status, or having a regular medical provider. CONCLUSIONS Modifiable access barriers to teledermatology adoption include trust, experience with teledermatology, and use of health apps. Teledermatology program implementation should address these specific factors within the digital divide to promote equitable access to care across diverse patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham Ghani
- City University of New York School of Medicine, City University of New York, New york, NY, United States
| | - Colin Adler
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Howa Yeung
- Department of Dermatology, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States
- Regional Telehealth Service, Veterans Affairs Veterans Integrated Service Network 7, Decatur, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Cosco TD, Fortuna K, Wister A, Riadi I, Wagner K, Sixsmith A. COVID-19, Social Isolation, and Mental Health Among Older Adults: A Digital Catch-22. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e21864. [PMID: 33891557 PMCID: PMC8104002 DOI: 10.2196/21864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the most at-risk groups during the COVID-19 crisis is older adults, especially those who live in congregate living settings and seniors’ care facilities, are immune-compromised, and/or have other underlying illnesses. Measures undertaken to contain the spread of the virus are far-reaching, and older adults were among the first groups to experience restrictions on face-to-face contact. Although reducing viral transmission is critical, physical distancing is associated with negative psychosocial implications, such as increased rates of depression and anxiety. Promising evidence suggests that participatory digital co-design, defined as the combination of user-centered design and community engagement models, is associated with increased levels of engagement with mobile technologies among individuals with mental health conditions. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted shortcomings of existing technologies and challenges in their uptake and usage; however, strategies such as co-design may be leveraged to address these challenges both in the adaptation of existing technologies and the development of new technologies. By incorporating these strategies, it is hoped that we can offset some of the negative mental health implications for older adults in the context of physical distancing both during and beyond the current pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore D Cosco
- Gerontology Research Center, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Andrew Wister
- Gerontology Research Center, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Indira Riadi
- Gerontology Research Center, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kevin Wagner
- Gerontology Research Center, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrew Sixsmith
- STAR Institute, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Haase KR, Cosco T, Kervin L, Riadi I, O'Connell ME. Older Adults' Experiences With Using Technology for Socialization During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Aging 2021; 4:e28010. [PMID: 33739929 PMCID: PMC8074950 DOI: 10.2196/28010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 03/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology use has become the most critical approach to maintaining social connectedness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Older adults (aged >65 years) are perceived as the most physiologically susceptible population to developing COVID-19 and are at risk of secondary mental health challenges related to the social isolation that has been imposed by virus containment strategies. To mitigate concerns regarding sampling bias, we analyzed a random sample of older adults to understand the uptake and acceptance of technologies that support socialization during the pandemic. OBJECTIVE We aimed to conduct a population-based assessment of the barriers and facilitators to engaging in the use of technology for web-based socialization among older adults in the Canadian province of British Columbia during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, population-based, regionally representative survey by using the random-digit dialing method to reach participants aged >65 years who live in British Columbia. Data were analyzed using SPSS (IBM Corporation), and open-text responses were analyzed via thematic analysis. RESULTS Respondents included 400 older adults aged an average of 72 years, and 63.7% (n=255) of respondents were female. Most respondents (n=358, 89.5%) were aware of how to use technology to connect with others, and slightly more than half of the respondents (n=224, 56%) reported that, since the beginning of the pandemic, they used technology differently to connect with others during the pandemic. Additionally, 55.9% (n=223) of respondents reported that they adopted new technology since the beginning of the pandemic. Older adults reported the following key barriers to using technology: (1) a lack of access (including finance-, knowledge-, and age-related issues); (2) a lack of interest (including a preference for telephones and a general lack of interest in computers); and (3) physical barriers (resultant of cognitive impairments, stroke, and arthritis). Older adults also reported the following facilitators: (1) a knowledge of technologies (from self-teaching or external courses); (2) reliance on others (family, friends, and general internet searches); (3) technology accessibility (including appropriate environments, user-friendly technology, and clear instructions); and (4) social motivation (everyone else is doing it). CONCLUSIONS Much data on older adults' use of technology are limited by sampling biases, but this study, which used a random sampling method, demonstrated that older adults used technology to mitigate social isolation during the pandemic. Web-based socialization is the most promising method for mitigating potential mental health effects that are related to virus containment strategies. Providing telephone training; creating task lists; and implementing the facilitators described by participants, such as facilitated socialization activities, are important strategies for addressing barriers, and these strategies can be implemented during and beyond the pandemic to bolster the mental health needs of older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen R Haase
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Applied Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Theodore Cosco
- Gerontology Research Center, Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Oxford Institute of Population Ageing, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Kervin
- Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Indira Riadi
- Department of Gerontology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Megan E O'Connell
- Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Furness K, Huggins CE, Truby H, Croagh D, Haines TP. Attitudes of Australian Patients Undergoing Treatment for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers to Different Models of Nutrition Care Delivery: Qualitative Investigation. JMIR Form Res 2021; 5:e23979. [PMID: 33709939 PMCID: PMC7998321 DOI: 10.2196/23979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Revised: 11/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Adults diagnosed with cancers of the stomach, esophagus, and pancreas are at high risk of malnutrition. In many hospital-based health care settings, there is a lack of systems in place to provide the early and intensive nutritional support that is required by these high-risk cancer patients. Our research team conducted a 3-arm parallel randomized controlled trial to test the provision of an early and intensive nutrition intervention to patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers using a synchronous telephone-based delivery approach versus an asynchronous mobile app–based approach delivered using an iPad compared with a control group to address this issue. Objective This study aims to explore the overall acceptability of an early and intensive eHealth nutrition intervention delivered either via a synchronous telephone-based approach or an asynchronous mobile app–based approach. Methods Patients who were newly diagnosed with upper gastrointestinal cancer and who consented to participate in a nutrition intervention were recruited. In-depth, semistructured qualitative interviews were conducted by telephone and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability in NVivo Pro 12 Plus. Results A total of 20 participants were interviewed, 10 from each intervention group (synchronous or asynchronous delivery). Four major themes emerged from the qualitative synthesis: participants’ self-efficacy, low levels of burden, and intervention comprehension were required for intervention effectiveness and positive affect; participants sought a sense of support and security through relationship building and rapport with their dietitian; knowledge acquisition and learning-enabled empowerment through self-management; and convenience, flexibility, and bridging the gap to hard-to-reach individuals. Conclusions Features of eHealth models of nutrition care delivered via telephone and mobile app can be acceptable to those undergoing treatment for upper gastrointestinal cancer. Convenience, knowledge acquisition, improved self-management, and support were key benefits for the participants. Future interventions should focus on home-based interventions delivered with simple, easy-to-use technology. Providing participants with a choice of intervention delivery mode (synchronous or asynchronous) and allowing them to make individual choices that align to their individual values and capabilities may support improved outcomes. Trial Registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ACTRN) 12617000152325; https://tinyurl.com/p3kxd37b.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Furness
- Monash Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Catherine Elizabeth Huggins
- Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Food, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Helen Truby
- School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Daniel Croagh
- Upper Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Terry Peter Haines
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pedell S, Borda A, Keirnan A, Aimers N. Combining the Digital, Social and Physical Layer to Create Age-Friendly Cities and Communities. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18010325. [PMID: 33466259 PMCID: PMC7794683 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 12/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
This qualitative investigation makes suggestions about creating age-friendly cities for older adults focusing on three domains of the World Health Organization (WHO) age-friendly city framework namely “Communication and Information”, “Outdoor Spaces and Buildings” and “Social Participation”. The authors present two case studies, the first one focusing on older adults using activity wearables for health self-management in the neighborhood, and the second one focusing on older adults engaged in social prescribing activities in the community. The authors then reflect on the relationships of the domains and future opportunities for age-friendly cities. These case studies apply a co-design and citizen-based approach focusing within these larger frameworks on emotions, values and motivational goals of older adults. Results suggest how the convergence of the often siloed age-friendly city components based on older adults’ goals and input can lead to better social participation and longer-term health outcomes. The authors propose that the digital, physical and social aspects need to be considered in all domains of age-friendly cities to achieve benefits for older adults. Further work involving older adults in the future shaping of age-friendly neighborhoods and cities, and identifying barriers and opportunities is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Pedell
- School of Design, Faculty of Health, Arts and Design, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-3-9214-6079
| | - Ann Borda
- Centre for Digital Transformation of Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia;
| | - Alen Keirnan
- Life Without Barriers, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia;
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Simmich J, Mandrusiak A, Russell T, Smith S, Hartley N. Perspectives of older adults with chronic disease on the use of wearable technology and video games for physical activity. Digit Health 2021; 7:20552076211019900. [PMID: 34104468 PMCID: PMC8168030 DOI: 10.1177/20552076211019900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in technology to deliver physical rehabilitation and allow clinicians to monitor progress. Examples include wearable activity trackers and active video games (AVGs), where physical activity is required to play the game. However, few studies have explored what may influence the effectiveness of these as technology-based physical activity interventions in older adults with chronic diseases. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore: 1) perceptions about wearable physical activity trackers; 2) perceptions about using technology to share physical activity information with clinicians; 3) barriers and motivators to playing games, including AVGs for rehabilitation. METHODS Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews with older adults (n = 19) with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS Wearable activity trackers were perceived as useful to quantify activity, facilitate goal-setting, visualize long-term improvements and provide reminders. Participants generally wished to share data with their clinicians to gain greater accountability, receive useful feedback and improve the quality of clinical care. Participants were motivated to play games (including AVGs) by seeking fun, social interaction and health benefits. Some felt that AVGs were of no benefit or were too difficult. Competition was both a motivator and a barrier. CONCLUSIONS The findings of the present study seek to inform the design of technology to encourage physical activity in older adults with chronic diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Simmich
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Allison Mandrusiak
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Trevor Russell
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| | - Stuart Smith
- School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia
| | - Nicole Hartley
- Faculty of Business, Economics and Law, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Fernandes A, Van Lenthe FJ, Vallée J, Sueur C, Chaix B. Linking physical and social environments with mental health in old age: a multisensor approach for continuous real-life ecological and emotional assessment. J Epidemiol Community Health 2020; 75:477-483. [PMID: 33148684 PMCID: PMC8053354 DOI: 10.1136/jech-2020-214274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2020] [Revised: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background Urban stress is mentioned as a plausible mechanism leading to chronic stress, which is a risk factor of depression. Yet, an accurate assessment of urban stressors in environmental epidemiology requires new methods. This article discusses methods for the sensor-based continuous assesment of geographic environments, stress and depressive symptoms in older age. We report protocols of the promoting mental well-being and healthy ageing in cities (MINDMAP) and Healthy Aging and Networks in Cities (HANC) studies nested in the RECORD Cohort as a background for a broad discussion about the theoretical foundation and monitoring tools of mobile sensing research in older age. Specifically, these studies allow one to compare how older people with and without depression perceive, navigate and use their environment; and how the built environments, networks of social contacts, and spatial mobility patterns influence the mental health of older people. Methods Our research protocol combines (1) Global Positioning System (GPS) and accelerometer tracking and a GPS-based mobility survey to assess participants’ mobility patterns, activity patterns and environmental exposures; (2) proximity detection to assess whether household members are close to each other; (3) ecological momentary assessment to track momentary mood and stress and environmental perceptions; and (4) electrodermal activity for the tentative prediction of stress. Data will be compared within individuals (at different times) and between persons with and without depressive symptoms. Conclusion The development of mobile sensing and survey technologies opens an avenue to improve understanding of the role of momentary stressors and resourcing features of residential and non-residential environments for older populations’ mental health. However, validation, privacy and ethical aspects are important issues to consider.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Fernandes
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Nemesis Research Team, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Frank J Van Lenthe
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.,Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Julie Vallée
- UMR Géographie-cités, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
| | - Cedric Sueur
- CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.,Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France
| | - Basile Chaix
- INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Épidémiologie et de Santé Publique, Nemesis Research Team, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Geerds MAJ, Nijmeijer WS, Hegeman JH, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR. Mobile App for Monitoring 3-Month Postoperative Functional Outcome After Hip Fracture: Usability Study. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e16989. [PMID: 32924949 PMCID: PMC7522745 DOI: 10.2196/16989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2019] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As a result of an aging population, there has been an increasing incidence of hip fractures worldwide. In the Netherlands, in order to improve the quality of care for elderly patients with hip fractures, the multidisciplinary Centre for Geriatric Traumatology was established in 2008 at the Department of Trauma Surgery at Ziekenhuisgroep Twente hospital (located in Almelo and Hengelo in the Netherlands). Objective Though the Dutch Hip Fracture audit is used to monitor the quality of care for patients with fractures of the hip, only 30.7% of patients complete registration in the 3-month follow-up period. Mobile apps offer an opportunity for improvement in this area. The aim of this study was to investigate the usability and acceptance of a mobile app for gathering indicators of quality of care in a 3-month follow-up period after postoperative treatment of hip fracture. Methods From July 2017 to December 2017, patients who underwent surgical treatment for hip fracture were recruited. Patients and caregivers, who were collectively considered the participant cohort, were asked to download the app and answer a questionnaire. Participants were divided into two groups—those who downloaded the app and those who did not download the app. A telephone interview that was based upon the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology was conducted with a subset of participants from each group (1:1 ratio). This study was designated as not being subject to the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act according to the appropriate medical research ethics committees. Results Of the patients and caregivers who participated, 26.4% (29/110) downloaded the app, whereas 73.6% (81/110) did not. Telephone interviews with the subset of participants (n=24 per group) revealed that 54.0% (13/24) of the group of participants who did not download the app had forgotten the study. Among the group who downloaded the app, 95.8% (23/24) had the intention of completing the questionnaire, but only 4.2% (1/24) did so. The reasons for not completing the questionnaire included technical problems, cognitive disorders, or patient dependency on caregivers. Most participants in the group who downloaded the app self-reported a high level of expertise in using a smartphone (22/24, 91.7%), and sufficient facilitating conditions for using a smartphone were self-reported in both groups (downloaded the app: 23/24, 95.8%; did not download the app: 21/24, 87.5%), suggesting that these factors were not barriers to completion. Conclusions Despite self-reported intention to use the app, smartphone expertise, and sufficient facilitating conditions for smartphone use, implementation of the mobile app was infeasible for daily practice. This was due to a combination of technical problems, factors related to the implementation process, and the population of interest having cognitive disorders or a dependency on caregivers for mobile technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merle A J Geerds
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Wieke S Nijmeijer
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, Netherlands.,Biomedical Signals and Systems, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - J H Hegeman
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, Netherlands
| | - Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten
- Biomedical Signals and Systems, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.,Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Academy, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Almelo, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Cornet VP, Toscos T, Bolchini D, Rohani Ghahari R, Ahmed R, Daley C, Mirro MJ, Holden RJ. Untold Stories in User-Centered Design of Mobile Health: Practical Challenges and Strategies Learned From the Design and Evaluation of an App for Older Adults With Heart Failure. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e17703. [PMID: 32706745 PMCID: PMC7404009 DOI: 10.2196/17703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background User-centered design (UCD) is a powerful framework for creating useful, easy-to-use, and satisfying mobile health (mHealth) apps. However, the literature seldom reports the practical challenges of implementing UCD, particularly in the field of mHealth. Objective This study aims to characterize the practical challenges encountered and propose strategies when implementing UCD for mHealth. Methods Our multidisciplinary team implemented a UCD process to design and evaluate a mobile app for older adults with heart failure. During and after this process, we documented the challenges the team encountered and the strategies they used or considered using to address those challenges. Results We identified 12 challenges, 3 about UCD as a whole and 9 across the UCD stages of formative research, design, and evaluation. Challenges included the timing of stakeholder involvement, overcoming designers’ assumptions, adapting methods to end users, and managing heterogeneity among stakeholders. To address these challenges, practical recommendations are provided to UCD researchers and practitioners. Conclusions UCD is a gold standard approach that is increasingly adopted for mHealth projects. Although UCD methods are well-described and easily accessible, practical challenges and strategies for implementing them are underreported. To improve the implementation of UCD for mHealth, we must tell and learn from these traditionally untold stories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Philip Cornet
- Department of Human-centered Computing, School of Informatics and Computing, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Tammy Toscos
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Davide Bolchini
- Department of Human-centered Computing, School of Informatics and Computing, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Romisa Rohani Ghahari
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Ryan Ahmed
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Carly Daley
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.,Department of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Michael J Mirro
- Parkview Mirro Center for Research and Innovation, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States.,Department of BioHealth Informatics, School of Informatics and Computing, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Richard J Holden
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States.,Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Loncar-Turukalo T, Zdravevski E, Machado da Silva J, Chouvarda I, Trajkovik V. Literature on Wearable Technology for Connected Health: Scoping Review of Research Trends, Advances, and Barriers. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14017. [PMID: 31489843 PMCID: PMC6818529 DOI: 10.2196/14017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wearable sensing and information and communication technologies are key enablers driving the transformation of health care delivery toward a new model of connected health (CH) care. The advances in wearable technologies in the last decade are evidenced in a plethora of original articles, patent documentation, and focused systematic reviews. Although technological innovations continuously respond to emerging challenges and technology availability further supports the evolution of CH solutions, the widespread adoption of wearables remains hindered. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to scope the scientific literature in the field of pervasive wearable health monitoring in the time interval from January 2010 to February 2019 with respect to four important pillars: technology, safety and security, prescriptive insight, and user-related concerns. The purpose of this study was multifold: identification of (1) trends and milestones that have driven research in wearable technology in the last decade, (2) concerns and barriers from technology and user perspective, and (3) trends in the research literature addressing these issues. METHODS This study followed the scoping review methodology to identify and process the available literature. As the scope surpasses the possibilities of manual search, we relied on the natural language processing tool kit to ensure an efficient and exhaustive search of the literature corpus in three large digital libraries: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, PubMed, and Springer. The search was based on the keywords and properties to be found in articles using the search engines of the digital libraries. RESULTS The annual number of publications in all segments of research on wearable technology shows an increasing trend from 2010 to February 2019. The technology-related topics dominated in the number of contributions, followed by research on information delivery, safety, and security, whereas user-related concerns were the topic least addressed. The literature corpus evidences milestones in sensor technology (miniaturization and placement), communication architectures and fifth generation (5G) cellular network technology, data analytics, and evolution of cloud and edge computing architectures. The research lag in battery technology makes energy efficiency a relevant consideration in the design of both sensors and network architectures with computational offloading. The most addressed user-related concerns were (technology) acceptance and privacy, whereas research gaps indicate that more efforts should be invested into formalizing clear use cases with timely and valuable feedback and prescriptive recommendations. CONCLUSIONS This study confirms that applications of wearable technology in the CH domain are becoming mature and established as a scientific domain. The current research should bring progress to sustainable delivery of valuable recommendations, enforcement of privacy by design, energy-efficient pervasive sensing, seamless monitoring, and low-latency 5G communications. To complement technology achievements, future work involving all stakeholders providing research evidence on improved care pathways and cost-effectiveness of the CH model is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eftim Zdravevski
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Saints Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
| | - José Machado da Silva
- Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ioanna Chouvarda
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Vladimir Trajkovik
- Faculty of Computer Science and Engineering, Saints Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, North Macedonia
| |
Collapse
|