1
|
Sanchez J, Trofholz A, Berge JM. Best Practices and Recommendations for Research Using Virtual Real-Time Data Collection: Protocol for Virtual Data Collection Studies. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e53790. [PMID: 38743477 DOI: 10.2196/53790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic and the subsequent need for social distancing required the immediate pivoting of research modalities. Research that had previously been conducted in person had to pivot to remote data collection. Researchers had to develop data collection protocols that could be conducted remotely with limited or no evidence to guide the process. Therefore, the use of web-based platforms to conduct real-time research visits surged despite the lack of evidence backing these novel approaches. OBJECTIVE This paper aims to review the remote or virtual research protocols that have been used in the past 10 years, gather existing best practices, and propose recommendations for continuing to use virtual real-time methods when appropriate. METHODS Articles (n=22) published from 2013 to June 2023 were reviewed and analyzed to understand how researchers conducted virtual research that implemented real-time protocols. "Real-time" was defined as data collection with a participant through a live medium where a participant and research staff could talk to each other back and forth in the moment. We excluded studies for the following reasons: (1) studies that collected participant or patient measures for the sole purpose of engaging in a clinical encounter; (2) studies that solely conducted qualitative interview data collection; (3) studies that conducted virtual data collection such as surveys or self-report measures that had no interaction with research staff; (4) studies that described research interventions but did not involve the collection of data through a web-based platform; (5) studies that were reviews or not original research; (6) studies that described research protocols and did not include actual data collection; and (7) studies that did not collect data in real time, focused on telehealth or telemedicine, and were exclusively intended for medical and not research purposes. RESULTS Findings from studies conducted both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic suggest that many types of data can be collected virtually in real time. Results and best practice recommendations from the current protocol review will be used in the design and implementation of a substudy to provide more evidence for virtual real-time data collection over the next year. CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that virtual real-time visits are doable across a range of participant populations and can answer a range of research questions. Recommended best practices for virtual real-time data collection include (1) providing adequate equipment for real-time data collection, (2) creating protocols and materials for research staff to facilitate or guide participants through data collection, (3) piloting data collection, (4) iteratively accepting feedback, and (5) providing instructions in multiple forms. The implementation of these best practices and recommendations for future research are further discussed in the paper. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/53790.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Sanchez
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Amanda Trofholz
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Jerica M Berge
- Department of Family Medicine and Adult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gell NM, Dittus K, Caefer J, Martin A, Bae M, Patel KV. Remotely delivered exercise to older rural cancer survivors: a randomized controlled pilot trial. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:596-605. [PMID: 36374436 PMCID: PMC9662104 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01292-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The study aimed to determine the feasibility of remotely delivered exercise (tele-exercise) for older, rural cancer survivors and to explore the effects of tele-exercise on physical function, physical activity, and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS Participants were rural cancer survivors age ≥ 60 years (79% female; mean age 70.4 ± 5.7) randomly assigned to the remotely delivered EnhanceFitness (tele-EF) exercise program, inclusive of aerobic, strength, and balance training and led by American Council on Exercise certified instructors for 1 h, 3 days/week for 16 weeks (n = 20) or to a waitlist control group (n = 19). We assessed feasibility, physical function, accelerometer-measured physical activity, and patient-reported outcomes at baseline and post intervention. RESULTS Among those screened as eligible, 44 (64%) consented to participate with 39 randomized after completing baseline measures. Attrition was equivalent between groups (n = 1, each) with 95% completing the study. The median class attendance rate was 86.9% (interquartile range: 79-94%). Compared to controls, tele-EF participants had statistically significant improvement in the five-time sit-to-stand test (- 3.4 vs. - 1.1 s, p = 0.03, effect size = 0.44), mean daily light physical activity (+ 38.5 vs 0.5 min, p = 0.03, effect size = 0.72) and step counts (+ 1977 vs. 33, p = 0.01, effect size = 0.96). There were no changes in self-efficacy for exercise, fatigue, or sleep disturbance between groups. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate that tele-EF is feasible in older, rural cancer survivors and results in positive changes in physical function and physical activity. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Tele-EF addresses common barriers to exercise for older, rural cancer survivors, including limited accessible opportunities for professional instruction and supervision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy M Gell
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 306B Rowell 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA.
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA.
| | - Kim Dittus
- University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, VT, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT, USA
| | - Jacqueline Caefer
- Department of Physical Therapy Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anita Martin
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 306B Rowell 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA
| | - Myeongjin Bae
- Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, 306B Rowell 106 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT, 05405, USA
| | - Kushang V Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
- Division of Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lai B, Wadsworth D, Spring K, Jones CS, Mintz M, Malone LA, Kim Y, Wilroy J, Lee H. Validity and Reliability of a Telehealth Physical Fitness and Functional Assessment Battery for Ambulatory Youth With and Without Mobility Disabilities: Observational Measurement Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2024; 11:e50582. [PMID: 38345838 PMCID: PMC10897795 DOI: 10.2196/50582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Youth (age 15-24 years) with and without disability are not adequately represented enough in exercise research due to a lack of time and transportation. These barriers can be overcome by including accessible web-based assessments that eliminate the need for on-site visitations. There is no simple, low-cost, and psychometrically sound compilation of measures for physical fitness and function that can be applied to youth with and without mobility disabilities. OBJECTIVE The first purpose was to determine the statistical level of agreement of 4 web-modified clinical assessments with how they are typically conducted in person at a laboratory (convergent validity). The second purpose was to determine the level of agreement between a novice and an expert rater (interrater reliability). The third purpose was to explore the feasibility of implementing the assessments via 2 metrics: safety and duration. METHODS The study enrolled 19 ambulatory youth: 9 (47%) with cerebral palsy with various mobility disabilities from a children's hospital and 10 (53%) without disabilities from a university student population. Participants performed a battery of tests via videoconferencing and in person. The test condition (teleassessment and in person) order was randomized. The battery consisted of the hand grip strength test with a dynamometer, the five times sit-to-stand test (FTST), the timed up-and-go (TUG) test, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) either around a standard circular track (in person) or around a smaller home-modified track (teleassessment version, home-modified 6-minute walk test [HM6MWT]). Statistical analyses included descriptive data, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS The mean time to complete the in-person assessment was 16.9 (SD 4.8) minutes and the teleassessment was 21.1 (SD 5.9) minutes. No falls, injuries, or adverse events occurred. Excellent convergent validity was shown for telemeasured hand grip strength (right ICC=0.96, left ICC=0.98, P<.001) and the TUG test (ICC=0.92, P=.01). The FTST demonstrated good agreement (ICC=0.95, 95% CI 0.79-0.98; P=.01). The HM6MWT demonstrated poor absolute agreement with the 6MWT. However, further exploratory analysis revealed a strong positive correlation between the tests (r=0.83, P<.001). The interrater reliability was excellent for all tests (all ICCs>0.9, P<.05). CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that videoconference assessments are convenient and useful measures of fitness and function among youth with and without disabilities. This paper presents operationalized teleassessment procedures that can be replicated by health professionals to produce valid and reliable measurements. This study is a first step toward developing teleassessments that can bypass the need for on-site data collection visitations for this age group. Further research is needed to identify psychometrically sound teleassessment procedures, particularly for measures of cardiorespiratory endurance or walking ability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byron Lai
- Division of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Danielle Wadsworth
- Exercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Katherine Spring
- Exercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Division of Population and Public Health Science, Pediatric Obesity and Health Behavior Laboratory, Baton Rouge, LA, United States
| | - Chloe S Jones
- Exercise Adherence and Obesity Prevention Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, United States
| | - Madison Mintz
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Laurie A Malone
- Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Yumi Kim
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Jereme Wilroy
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| | - Holim Lee
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Villar R, Beltrame T, Ferreira dos Santos G, Zago AS, Bocalini DS, Pontes Júnior FL. Test-retest reliability and agreement of remote home-based functional capacity self-administered assessments in community-dwelling, socially isolated older adults. Digit Health 2024; 10:20552076241254904. [PMID: 38778868 PMCID: PMC11110522 DOI: 10.1177/20552076241254904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives To determine the test-retest reliability and agreement of home-based functional capacity self-administered assessments in socially isolated older adults. Methods Fourteen community-dwelling older adults (eight females, 67.9 ± 7.7 years) volunteered for this study. Before testing, participants were screened online for eligibility and received instructional videos explaining test set-up and execution. Participants underwent the 30-second sit-to-standing test, gait speed tests at the usual pace, and timed-up-and-go tests administered 4 weeks apart. For the 30-second sit-to-standing protocol, participants were instructed to repeatedly sit and stand from a chair (with a height of ∼ 43 cm and without armrests) for 30 s, with the number of repetitions recorded. In the gait speed test protocol, participants were instructed to walk at their usual and comfortable pace, with the time taken recorded (seconds). In the timed-up-and-go, participants stood up from a chair, walked as fast as possible for 3 m, circled a marked point, and returned to the chair to sit down, completing the test, with the score recorded (seconds). A trained researcher conducted the scoring virtually via synchronous video. Results 30-second sit-to-standing, gait speed test, and timed-up-and-go showed excellent mean coefficient of variation values (2.0-4.9), small standard error of measurement (0.08-1.27), excellent intraclass coefficient (0.97-0.99), very strong correlations (0.97-0.99) and good agreement between the two days of testing. Conclusion Self-administered functional capacity tests performed by older adults at home were reliable with good agreement. Healthcare professionals and older adults should take advantage of simple remote self-administered assessments performed at home to evaluate older adults' health status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Villar
- Cardiorespiratory & Physiology of Exercise Research Laboratory, Faculty of Kinesiology and Recreation Management, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Thomas Beltrame
- Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Ibirapuera, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Institute of Computing, University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Ferreira dos Santos
- Physiology of Exercise & Aging Laboratory, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Anderson Saranz Zago
- Department of Physical Education, Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, SP, Brazil
| | - Danilo Sales Bocalini
- Biochemistry and Physiology Laboratory. Physical Education and Sport Center of Federal University of Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
| | - Francisco Luciano Pontes Júnior
- Physiology of Exercise & Aging Laboratory, School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoge C, Bowling CB, Dunlop‐Thomas C, Pearce BD, Drenkard C, Lim SS, Plantinga LC. Remote Administration of Physical and Cognitive Performance Assessments in a Predominantly Black Cohort of Persons With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. ACR Open Rheumatol 2023; 5:499-507. [PMID: 37582606 PMCID: PMC10502850 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In a study of physical and cognitive functioning among predominantly Black individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we compared remotely administered physical and cognitive performance assessments to those collected in person. METHODS A subset of participants who completed an in-person visit in our parent study from 2021 to 2022 (n = 30) were recruited to complete a second, remote visit within 28 days. Physical performance (measured by a modified Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB]; range 0-12; subscale ranges 0-4; higher = better performance) and cognitive performance (episodic and working memory adjusted t-scores, measured using NIH Toolbox) were measured at both visits. Mean scores were compared using paired t-tests; intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were obtained from two-way mixed effects models. Linear and logistic models were used to estimate stratified associations between performance measures and related outcomes. RESULTS Participants were primarily female (93.3%) and Black (93.3%). In-person versus remote overall SPPB (8.76 vs. 9.43) and chair stand (1.43 vs. 1.90) scores were statistically significantly lower. t-Scores for episodic memory (47.27 vs. 49.53) and working memory (45.37 vs. 47.90) were lower for in-person versus remote visits. The ICC for overall SPPB indicated good agreement (0.76), whereas the ICCs for episodic (0.49) and working memory (0.57) indicated poor-moderate agreement. Associations between assessments of performance with related outcomes were similar and did not statistically significantly differ by modality of visit. CONCLUSION To possibly expand and diversify pools of participants in studies of physical and cognitive performance in SLE, remote administration of assessments should be considered for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - C. Barrett Bowling
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical CenterDurham Veterans AffairsDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
- School of MedicineDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Brad D. Pearce
- Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Cristina Drenkard
- School of MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
- Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - S. Sam Lim
- School of MedicineEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
- Rollins School of Public HealthEmory UniversityAtlantaGeorgiaUSA
| | - Laura C. Plantinga
- School of MedicineUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Steffens D, Pocovi NC, Bartyn J, Delbaere K, Hancock MJ, Koh C, Denehy L, van Schooten KS, Solomon M. Feasibility, Reliability, and Safety of Remote Five Times Sit to Stand Test in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092434. [PMID: 37173899 PMCID: PMC10177509 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To determine the feasibility, reliability, and safety of the remote five times sit to stand test (5STS) test in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Methods: Consecutive adult patients undergoing surgical treatment for lower gastrointestinal cancer at a major referral hospital in Sydney between July and November 2022 were included. Participants completed the 5STS test both face-to-face and remotely, with the order randomised. Outcomes included measures of feasibility, reliability, and safety. Results: Of fifty-five patients identified, seventeen (30.9%) were not interested, one (1.8%) had no internet coverage, and thirty-seven (67.3%) consented and completed both 5STS tests. The mean (SD) time taken to complete the face-to-face and remote 5STS tests was 9.1 (2.4) and 9.5 (2.3) seconds, respectively. Remote collection by telehealth was feasible, with only two participants (5.4%) having connectivity issues at the start of the remote assessment, but not interfering with the tests. The remote 5STS test showed excellent reliability (ICC = 0.957), with limits of agreement within acceptable ranges and no significant systematic errors observed. No adverse events were observed within either test environment. Conclusions: Remote 5STS for the assessment of functional lower extremity strength in gastrointestinal cancer patients is feasible, reliable, and safe, and can be used in clinical and research settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
| | - Natasha C Pocovi
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Jenna Bartyn
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
| | - Kim Delbaere
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Mark J Hancock
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Cherry Koh
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Linda Denehy
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
- Department of Health Services Research, Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Kimberley S van Schooten
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW 2052, Australia
| | - Michael Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2042, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lavín-Pérez AM, León-Llamas JL, Salas Costilla FJ, Collado-Mateo D, López de las Heras R, Gasque Celma P, Villafaina S. Validity of On-Line Supervised Fitness Tests in People with Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11071019. [PMID: 37046945 PMCID: PMC10094436 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11071019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity between online evaluations (OEs) and face-to-face evaluations (IPEs) of a Senior Fitness Test and two balance tests in people with low back pain (LBP). Forty participants of 58.48 (9.87) years were included. The 30 s chair stand-up, arm curl, 2 min step, chair-sit and reach, back scratch, 8 foot up-and-go, sharpened Romberg, and one-legged stance tests were administrated using both OE and IPE methods. The results indicated no significant differences (p > 0.05) between the two methods except in the 8-foot up-and-go test (p = 0.007). Considering the ICC values and Bland-Altman plots, excellent agreement was found for the chair-sit and reach test, moderate agreement for the arm-curl and 8-foot up-and-go tests, and good agreement for the other tests. Strong correlations (p < 0.001) were observed in all variables except for the arm-curl and 8-foot up-and-go tests, where moderate correlations were found (p < 0.05). These results support the validity of OEs and IPEs in all tests, except for the arm-curl and 8-foot up-and-go tests, where lower ICC values and moderate correlations were found. However, it is important to consider the range of fluctuation of the ICC and the significant values obtained through correlations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Myriam Lavín-Pérez
- Centre for Sport Studies, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28943 Fuenlabrada, Spain
- GO fitLAB, Ingesport, 28003 Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Luis León-Llamas
- Physical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Pablo Gasque Celma
- Sports Medicine Service, Alcobendas City Council, 28100 Alcobendas, Spain
- Department of Physical Education, Sport and Human Motricity, Autónoma Univesity, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | - Santos Villafaina
- Physical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group (AFYCAV), Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Universidad de Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain
- Departamento de Desporto e Saúde, Escola de Saúde e Desenvolvimento Humano, Universidade de Évora, 7004-516 Évora, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Swartz MC, Robertson MC, Christopherson U, Wells SJ, Lewis ZH, Bai J, Swartz MD, Silva HC, Martinez E, Lyons EJ. Assessing the Suitability of a Virtual 'Pink Warrior' for Older Breast Cancer Survivors during COVID-19: A Pilot Study. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:574. [PMID: 36836931 PMCID: PMC9965453 DOI: 10.3390/life13020574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the conduct of in-person physical activity (PA) interventions among older survivors of BC, who need such interventions to stay active and prevent functional decline. We tested the feasibility of virtually delivering an exergame-based PA intervention to older BC survivors. We enrolled 20 female BC survivors ≥55 years and randomly assigned them to two groups. The intervention group (Pink Warrior 2) received 12 weekly virtual exergame sessions with behavioral coaching, survivorship navigation support, and a Fitbit for self-monitoring. The control group received 12 weekly phone-based survivorship discussion sessions and wore a Mi Band 3. Feasibility was evaluated by rates of recruitment (≥0.92 participants/center/month), retention (≥80%), and group attendance (≥10 sessions), percentage of completed virtual assessments, and number of technology-related issues and adverse events. Intervention acceptability was measured by participants' ratings on a scale of 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The recruitment rate was 1.93. The retention and attendance rates were 90% and 88% (≥10 sessions), respectively. Ninety-six percent completed virtual assessments without an adverse event. Acceptability was high (≥4). The intervention met benchmarks for feasibility. Additional research is needed to further understand the impact of virtually delivered PA interventions on older BC survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria C. Swartz
- Department of Pediatrics Research, Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael C. Robertson
- Department of Nutrition, Metabolism & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA
| | - Ursela Christopherson
- Department of Nutrition, Metabolism & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA
| | - Stephanie J. Wells
- Department of Pediatrics Research, Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Zakkoyya H. Lewis
- Department of Kinesiology & Health Promotion, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA 91768, USA
| | - Jinbing Bai
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | - Michael D. Swartz
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - H. Colleen Silva
- Department of Surgery, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA
| | - Eloisa Martinez
- Sealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Lyons
- Department of Nutrition, Metabolism & Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dong H, Shin H, Ho E, Jin HJ, Letourneau S, Banerjee T, Masschelein G, Davidson J, Wilson C, de Ribaupierre S, Eagleson R, Symonette CJ. Next-Generation Remote Hand Assessments: Cross-Platform DIGITS Web Application. JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY GLOBAL ONLINE 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/27/2023] Open
|
10
|
Fram J, Vail C, Roy I. Assessment of Cancer-Associated Cachexia - How to Approach Physical Function Evaluation. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:751-761. [PMID: 35305209 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01258-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cachexia is a devastating syndrome that impacts a majority of cancer patients. Early assessment of cachexia is critical to implementing cachexia treatments. Our aim was to summarize the existing cachexia assessment tools for their utility in both symptom and function evaluation. RECENT FINDINGS Several tools now exist that provide a symptom-based approach for evaluating weight change, appetite, and nutrition impact symptoms in cancer patients with cachexia. However, current instruments used to assess physical function changes related to cachexia are limited in depth and breadth. Instead, we recommend a tiered approach to cachexia-related functional assessment that involves evaluation of activities of daily living, general mobility, and exercise tolerance in a prioritized sequence. Current tools for cancer-associated cachexia assessment are adept at symptom evaluation. New approaches to physical function evaluation are needed that efficiently and broadly evaluate the diverse functional needs of cachexia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Fram
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 26th floor, 355 E. Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 710 N Lake Shore Dr #1022, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Caroline Vail
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 26th floor, 355 E. Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 710 N Lake Shore Dr #1022, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| | - Ishan Roy
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, 26th floor, 355 E. Erie St, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 710 N Lake Shore Dr #1022, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
- Robert H. Lurie Cancer Center, 675 N St Clair St Fl 21 Ste 100, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hoenemeyer TW, Cole WW, Oster RA, Pekmezi DW, Pye A, Demark-Wahnefried W. Test/Retest Reliability and Validity of Remote vs. In-Person Anthropometric and Physical Performance Assessments in Cancer Survivors and Supportive Partners. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1075. [PMID: 35205823 PMCID: PMC8869803 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14041075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Anthropometric and physical performance testing is commonly done in lifestyle research and is traditionally performed in-person. To expand the scalability of lifestyle interventions among cancer survivors, in-person assessments were adapted to remote means and evaluated for feasibility, safety, validity, and reliability. (2) Methods: Cancer survivors and supportive partners were approached to participate in three anthropometric and physical performance testing sessions (two remote/one in-person). Correlations, concordance, and differences between testing modes were evaluated. (3) Results: 110-of-112 individuals approached for testing participated (98% uptake); the sample was 78% female, 64% non-Hispanic White, of mean age 58 years and body mass index = 32.4 kg/m2. ICCs for remote assessments ranged from moderate (8' walk = 0.47), to strong (8' get-up-and-go = 0.74), to very strong (30 s chair stand = 0.80; sit-and-reach = 0.86; 2 min step test = 0.87; back scratch = 0.90; weight = 0.93; waist circumference = 0.98) (p-values < 0.001). Perfect concordance (100%) was found for side-by-side and semi-tandem balance, and 87.5-90.3% for tandem balance. No significant differences between remote and in-person assessments were found for weight, 8' walk, and 8' get-up-and-go. No adverse events occurred and 75% indicated no preference or preferred virtual testing to in-person. (4) Conclusions: Remote anthropometric and physical performance assessments are reliable, valid, acceptable, and safe among cancer survivors and supportive partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teri W. Hoenemeyer
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (W.W.C.); (A.P.); (W.D.-W.)
| | - William W. Cole
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (W.W.C.); (A.P.); (W.D.-W.)
| | - Robert A. Oster
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (R.A.O.); (D.W.P.)
- Department of Preventive Medicine, UAB School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Dorothy W. Pekmezi
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (R.A.O.); (D.W.P.)
- Department of Health Behavior, UAB School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA
| | - Andrea Pye
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (W.W.C.); (A.P.); (W.D.-W.)
| | - Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
- Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (W.W.C.); (A.P.); (W.D.-W.)
- O’Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA; (R.A.O.); (D.W.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Morgan A, Bégin D, Heisz J, Tang A, Thabane L, Richardson J. Measurement properties of remotely or self-administered physical performance measures to assess mobility: a systematic review protocol. PHYSICAL THERAPY REVIEWS 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/10833196.2021.1978779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Morgan
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diane Bégin
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Heisz
- Department of Kinesiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ada Tang
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Richardson
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|