1
|
Göttgens I, Oertelt-Prigione S. The Application of Human-Centered Design Approaches in Health Research and Innovation: A Narrative Review of Current Practices. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2021; 9:e28102. [PMID: 34874893 PMCID: PMC8691403 DOI: 10.2196/28102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Human-centered design (HCD) approaches to health care strive to support the development of innovative, effective, and person-centered solutions for health care. Although their use is increasing, there is no integral overview describing the details of HCD methods in health innovations. Objective This review aims to explore the current practices of HCD approaches for the development of health innovations, with the aim of providing an overview of the applied methods for participatory and HCD processes and highlighting their shortcomings for further research. Methods A narrative review of health research was conducted based on systematic electronic searches in the PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts (2000-2020) databases using keywords related to human-centered design, design thinking (DT), and user-centered design (UCD). Abstracts and full-text articles were screened by 2 reviewers independently based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data extraction focused on the methodology used throughout the research process, the choice of methods in different phases of the innovation cycle, and the level of engagement of end users. Results This review summarizes the application of HCD practices across various areas of health innovation. All approaches prioritized the user’s needs and the participatory and iterative nature of the design process. The design processes comprised several design cycles during which multiple qualitative and quantitative methods were used in combination with specific design methods. HCD- and DT-based research primarily targeted understanding the research context and defining the problem, whereas UCD-based work focused mainly on the direct generation of solutions. Although UCD approaches involved end users primarily as testers and informants, HCD and DT approaches involved end users most often as design partners. Conclusions We have provided an overview of the currently applied methodologies and HCD guidelines to assist health care professionals and design researchers in their methodological choices. HCD-based techniques are challenging to evaluate using traditional biomedical research methods. Previously proposed reporting guidelines are a step forward but would require a level of detail that is incompatible with the current publishing landscape. Hence, further development is needed in this area. Special focus should be placed on the congruence between the chosen methods, design strategy, and achievable outcomes. Furthermore, power dimensions, agency, and intersectionality need to be considered in co-design sessions with multiple stakeholders, especially when including vulnerable groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Göttgens
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Sabine Oertelt-Prigione
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schwartz-Lasfargues C, Roux-Gendron C, Edomskis P, Marque I, Bayon Y, Lange JF, Faucheron JL, Trilling B. Early User Centred Design during development of an innovative medical device: case study of a connected Sensor System in colorectal surgery (Preprint). JMIR Hum Factors 2021; 9:e31529. [PMID: 35802406 PMCID: PMC9308077 DOI: 10.2196/31529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A successful innovative medical device is not only technically challenging to develop but must also be readily usable to be integrated into health care professionals’ daily practice. Through a user-centered design (UCD) approach, usability can be improved. However, this type of approach is not widely implemented from the early stages of medical device development. Objective The case study presented here shows how UCD may be applied at the very early stage of the design of a disruptive medical device used in a complex hospital environment, while no functional device is available yet. The device under study is a connected sensor system to detect colorectal anastomotic leakage, the most detrimental complication following colorectal surgery, which has a high medical cost. We also aimed to provide usability guidelines for the initial design of other innovative medical devices. Methods UCD was implemented by actively involving health care professionals and all the industrial partners of the project. The methodology was conducted in 2 European hospitals: Grenoble-Alpes University Hospital (France) and Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam (the Netherlands). A total of 6 elective colorectal procedures and 5 ward shifts were observed. In total, 4 workshops were conducted with project partners and clinicians. A formative evaluation was performed based on 5 usability tests using nonfunctional prototype systems. The case study was completed within 12 months. Results Functional specifications were defined for the various components of the medical device: device weight, size, design, device attachment, and display module. These specifications consider the future integration of the medical device into current clinical practice (for use in an operating room and patient follow-up inside the hospital) and interactions between surgeons, nurses, nurse assistants, and patients. By avoiding irrelevant technical development, this approach helps to promote cost-effective design. Conclusions This paper presents the successful deployment over 12 months of a UCD methodology for the design of an innovative medical device during its early development phase. To help in reusing this methodology to design other innovative medical devices, we suggested best practices based on this case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christel Schwartz-Lasfargues
- Public Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Inserm CIC 1406, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | | | - Pim Edomskis
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Marque
- Public Health Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- Inserm CIC 1406, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Yves Bayon
- Medtronic - Sofradim Production, Trevoux, France
| | - Johan F Lange
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jean Luc Faucheron
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Visceral Surgery and Acute Care Surgery Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- TIMC, Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, France
| | - Bertrand Trilling
- Colorectal Surgery Unit, Visceral Surgery and Acute Care Surgery Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
- TIMC, Université Grenoble Alpes, Centre National de Recherche Scientifique, Grenoble INP, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Logan V, Keeley S, Akerman K, De Baetselier E, Dilles T, Griffin N, Matthews L, Van Rompaey B, Jordan S. Did we do everything we could have? Nurses' contributions to medicines optimization: A mixed-methods study. Nurs Open 2021; 8:592-606. [PMID: 33570308 PMCID: PMC7877145 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To explore UK professionals' interpretations of medicines optimization and expansion of nurses' roles. DESIGN This mixed-methods study sought professionals' views on nurses' involvement, competency and engagement in monitoring patients for adverse effects of medicines, monitoring adherence, prescribing and patient education. METHOD An online survey and interviews were undertaken with nurses, doctors and pharmacists in Wales and England, May 2018 to July 2019. RESULTS In all, 220 nurses, 17 doctors and 62 pharmacists responded to the online survey, and 24 professionals were interviewed. Nurses were divided over extending their roles, with 123/220 (55.9%) wishing to extend roles in monitoring patients for possible adverse drug reactions (ADRs), 111/220 (50.5%) in adherence monitoring, 121/220 (55.0%) in prescribing and 122/220 (55.4%) in patient education. The best-qualified nurses were the most willing to increase involvement in monitoring patients for ADRs (aOR 13.00, 1.56-108.01). Interviews revealed that both nurses and doctors assumed the other profession was undertaking this monitoring. Respondents agreed that increasing nurses' involvement in medicines optimization would improve patient care, but expressed reservations about nurses' competencies. Collaboration between nurses and doctors was suboptimal (rated 7/10 at best) and between nurses and pharmacists even more so (6/10 at best). CONCLUSION Juxtaposition of datasets identified problems with medicines optimization: although most respondents agreed that increasing nurses' involvement would positively impact practice, their educational preparation was a barrier. Only ~50% of nurses were willing to expand their roles to fill the hiatus in care identified and ensure that at least one profession was taking responsibility for ADR monitoring. IMPACT To improve multiprofessional team working and promote patient safety, nurse leaders should ensure patients are monitored for possible ADRs by at least one profession. Initiatives expanding nurses' roles in medicines optimization and prescribing might be best targeted towards the more educated nurses, who have multidisciplinary support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vera Logan
- Department of NursingSwansea UniversitySwanseaUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Kevin Akerman
- Department of NursingSwansea UniversitySwanseaUnited Kingdom
| | - Elyne De Baetselier
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCRIC (Center of Research and Innovation in Care)NuPhaCUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
| | - Tinne Dilles
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCRIC (Center of Research and Innovation in Care)NuPhaCUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
| | - Nia Griffin
- Department of NursingSwansea UniversitySwanseaUnited Kingdom
| | - Lisa Matthews
- Department of NursingSwansea UniversitySwanseaUnited Kingdom
| | - Bart Van Rompaey
- Faculty of Medicine and Health SciencesCRIC (Center of Research and Innovation in Care)NuPhaCUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium
| | - Sue Jordan
- Department of NursingSwansea UniversitySwanseaUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schiro J, Pelayo S, Martinot A, Dubos F, Beuscart-Zéphir MC, Marcilly R. Applying a Human-Centered Design to Develop a Patient Prioritization Tool for a Pediatric Emergency Department: Detailed Case Study of First Iterations. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e18427. [PMID: 32886071 PMCID: PMC7501580 DOI: 10.2196/18427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 06/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overcrowding in the emergency departments has become an increasingly significant problem. Patient triage strategies are acknowledged to help clinicians manage patient flow and reduce patients' waiting time. However, electronic patient triage systems are not developed so that they comply with clinicians' workflow. OBJECTIVE This case study presents the development of a patient prioritization tool (PPT) and of the related patient prioritization algorithm (PPA) for a pediatric emergency department (PED), relying on a human-centered design process. METHODS We followed a human-centered design process, wherein we (1) performed a work system analysis through observations and interviews in an academic hospital's PED; (2) deduced design specifications; (3) designed a mock PPT and the related PPA; and (4) performed user testing to assess the intuitiveness of the icons, the effectiveness in communicating patient priority, the fit between the prioritization model implemented and the participants' prioritization rules, and the participants' satisfaction. RESULTS The workflow analysis identified that the PPT interface should meet the needs of physicians and nurses, represent the stages of patient care, and contain patient information such as waiting time, test status (eg, prescribed, in progress), age, and a suggestion for prioritization. The mock-up developed gives the status of patients progressing through the PED; a strip represents the patient and the patient's characteristics, including a delay indicator that compares the patient's waiting time to the average waiting time of patients with a comparable reason for emergency. User tests revealed issues with icon intuitiveness, information gaps, and possible refinements in the prioritization algorithm. CONCLUSIONS The results of the user tests have led to modifications to improve the usability and usefulness of the PPT and its PPA. We discuss the value of integrating human factors into the design process for a PPT for PED. The PPT/PPA has been developed and installed in Lille University Hospital's PED. Studies are carried out to evaluate the use and impact of this tool on clinicians' situation awareness and prioritization-related cognitive load, prioritization of patients, waiting time, and patients' experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Schiro
- Inserm, CIC-IT 1403/Evalab, F-59000, Lille, France.,Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Sylvia Pelayo
- Inserm, CIC-IT 1403/Evalab, F-59000, Lille, France.,Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Alain Martinot
- Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France.,Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - François Dubos
- Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France.,Paediatric Emergency Unit & Infectious Diseases, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Marie-Catherine Beuscart-Zéphir
- Inserm, CIC-IT 1403/Evalab, F-59000, Lille, France.,Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France
| | - Romaric Marcilly
- Inserm, CIC-IT 1403/Evalab, F-59000, Lille, France.,Univ Lille, CHU Lille, ULR 2694 - METRICS : Évaluation des technologies de santé et des pratiques médicales, F-59000, Lille, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wegner S, Lohmeyer Q, Wahlen D, Neumann S, Groebli JC, Meboldt M. Value of Eye-Tracking Data for Classification of Information Processing-Intensive Handling Tasks: Quasi-Experimental Study on Cognition and User Interface Design. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e15581. [PMID: 32490840 PMCID: PMC7301256 DOI: 10.2196/15581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In order to give a wide range of people the opportunity to ensure and support home care, one approach is to develop medical devices that are as user-friendly as possible. This allows nonexperts to use medical devices that were originally too complicated to use. For a user-centric development of such medical devices, it is essential to understand which user interface design best supports patients, caregivers, and health care professionals. Objective Using the benefits of mobile eye tracking, this work aims to gain a deeper understanding of the challenges of user cognition. As a consequence, its goal is to identify the obstacles to the usability of the features of two different designs of a single medical device user interface. The medical device is a patient assistance device for home use in peritoneal dialysis therapy. Methods A total of 16 participants, with a subset of seniors (8/16, mean age 73.7 years) and young adults (8/16, mean age 25.0 years), were recruited and participated in this study. The handling cycle consisted of seven main tasks. Data analysis started with the analysis of task effectiveness for searching for error-related tasks. Subsequently, the in-depth gaze data analysis focused on these identified critical tasks. In order to understand the challenges of user cognition in critical tasks, gaze data were analyzed with respect to individual user interface features of the medical device system. Therefore, it focused on the two dimensions of dwell time and fixation duration of the gaze. Results In total, 97% of the handling steps for design 1 and 96% for design 2 were performed correctly, with the main challenges being task 1 insert, task 2 connect, and task 6 disconnect for both designs. In order to understand the two analyzed dimensions of the physiological measurements simultaneously, the authors propose a new graphical representation. It distinguishes four different patterns to compare the eye movements associated with the two designs. The patterns identified for the critical tasks are consistent with the results of the task performance. Conclusions This study showed that mobile eye tracking provides insights into information processing in intensive handling tasks related to individual user interface features. The evaluation of each feature of the user interface promises an optimal design by combining the best found features. In this way, manufacturers are able to develop products that can be used by untrained people without prior knowledge. This would allow home care to be provided not only by highly qualified nurses and caregivers, but also by patients themselves, partners, children, or neighbors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Wegner
- Product Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Quentin Lohmeyer
- Product Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Dimitri Wahlen
- Product Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Mirko Meboldt
- Product Development Group Zurich, Institute of Design, Materials and Fabrication, Department of Mechanical and Process Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize significant research contributions on human factors (HF) and organizational issues in medical informatics published in 2018. METHODS An extensive search using PubMed/Medline and Web of Science® was conducted to identify the scientific contributions published in 2018 that address human factors and organizational issues in medical informatics. The selection process comprised three steps: (i) 15 candidate best papers were first selected by the two section editors, (ii) external reviewers from internationally renowned research teams reviewed each candidate best paper, and (iii) the final selection of four best papers was conducted by the editorial board of the Yearbook. RESULTS The four selected best papers are excellent contributions to the HF literature: they show the added value of HF studies by providing nice illustrated and rigorous interventions. CONCLUSION HF interventions are known to have great potential to contribute to efficient HIT design, but the interventions still face challenges in successfully demonstrating their value to the main stakeholders of the healthcare domain. There is a need to strengthen the demand for high-quality HF studies by increasing awareness among powerful stakeholders of the value of high-quality HF studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Pelayo
- University of Lille, INSERM, CHU Lille, CIC-IT 1403/Evalab - Centre d'Investigation Clinique, EA 2694, F-59000 Lille, France
| | - Yalini Senathirajah
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Dept. of Biomedical Informatics, Pittsburgh, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|