Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography

Medical Imaging Technology and Imaging Agents

Medical imaging is a technology that studies the interaction between human body and irradiations of X-ray, ultrasound, magnetic field, etc. and represents anatomical structures of human organs/tissues with the implication of irradiation attenuation in the form of grayscales. With these medical images, detailed information on health status and disease diagnosis may be judged by clinical physicians to determine an appropriate therapy approach. This chapter will give a systematic introduction on the modalities, classifications, basic principles, and biomedical applications of traditional medical imaging along with the types, construction, and major features of the corresponding contrast agents or imaging probes.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in Focal Liver Lesions (FLL) with inconclusive findings on cross-sectional imaging

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been used as an additional imaging technique in order to evaluate focal liver lesions. CEUS is easy and fast to perform, overcomes the limitations of B-mode US.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic potential of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in focal liver lesions (FLL) with unclear findings on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective study, 146 patients with at least one FLL underwent additional CEUS of the liver to clarify inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings. Ultrasonography was performed using B-mode imaging and CEUS after injection of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles (second-generation contrast agent) within two months after ceMRI or ceCT and interpreted by an experienced radiologist (EFSUMB level 3). Histopathological reports, long-term follow-up or clinical course served as reference standard.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight of the 146 patients had malignant and 108 benign FLL. Overall, CEUS had 92% sensitivity (95% -CI, 79-97) and 98% specificity (95% -CI, 93-99) with an AUC of 0.95 in correctly characterizing the lesion as malignant or benign. Sensitivity increased to 98% (95% -CI, 96-100) for benign lesions and decreased to 92% (95% -CI, 78-98) for malignant lesions. CEUS showed the highest diagnostical accuracy in lesion <1 cm with an AUC of 1.000, while the lowest accuracy was achieved in lesions >2 cm with an AUC of 0.924 due to a decreasing specificity of 86% (95% -CI, 87-100).

CONCLUSION

CEUS correctly distinguished malignant from benign FLL in cases with inconclusive cross-sectional imaging findings and achieved high levels of diagnostic accuracy. CEUS has added diagnostic value especially in small lesions ≤1 cm while specificity remains limited in larger lesions.

Diagnostic approach in hepatic lymphoma: radiological imaging findings and literature review

PURPOSE

Imaging manifestations of hepatic lymphoma, both primary (PHL) and secondary (SHL), are extremely variable and non-specific, but some features are useful diagnostic clues in an appropriate clinical setting. Through a PubMed search, we found several published reviews focused on PHL and SHL diagnosis. However, to the best of our knowledge, few of them encompass a comprehensive analysis of all the diagnostic tools and relative radiological findings. The aim of this review is to provide a description of the radiological features of both PHL and SHL, by critically analyzing the available literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An extensive review of published literature along with a description of personal case series of both PHL and SHL has been conducted.

RESULTS

SHL can be easily diagnosed with imaging techniques, as it is usually associated with node disease. On the contrary the diagnosis can be a challenge in PHL, often mimicking HCC or liver metastasis of adenocarcinoma. In this context, multiparametric MRI plays a fundamental role in the differential diagnosis. Both for PHL and SHL, liver involvement presents as solitary or multiple lesions or as diffuse infiltrative disease.

CONCLUSION

PHL and SHL may be correctly characterized using different radiological techniques. Both CT and MRI have showed a good correlation with histology, as they permit to distinguish between lymphomatous tissue, and necrotic and fibrotic areas.

Current role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma

Ultrasonography (US) is a major, sustainable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance method as it provides inexpensive, real-time, and noninvasive detection. Since US findings are based on pathological features, knowledge of pathological features is essential for delivering a correct US diagnosis. Recent advances in US equipment have made it possible to provide more information, such as malignancy potential and accurate localization diagnosis of HCC. Evaluation of malignancy potential is important to determine the treatment strategy, especially for small HCC. Diagnosis of blood flow dynamics using color Doppler and contrast-enhanced US is one of the most definitive approaches for evaluating HCC malignancy potential. Recently, a new Doppler microvascular imaging technique, superb microvascular imaging, which can detect Doppler signals generated by low-velocity blood flow, was developed. A fusion imaging system, another innovative US technology, has already become an indispensable technology over the last few years not only for US-guided radiofrequency ablation but also for the detection of small, invisible HCC. This article reviews the evidence on the use of ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Sonazoid for the practical management of HCC.

Comparison of Sonazoid and SonoVue in the Diagnosis of Focal Liver Lesions: A Preliminary Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Sonazoid and SonoVue in subjects with focal liver lesions.

METHODS

The patients who had untreated focal solid liver lesions confirmed by B-mode ultrasonography were eligible for the study. The target lesion and whole liver were scanned by gray scale ultrasonography; then, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed, and the results were evaluated blindly. The main end point was accuracy improvement with postcontrast versus precontrast ultrasound examination for diagnosis of the target lesion of interest as malignant or benign against the reference standard.

RESULTS

There were 65 patients with 65 hepatic tumors enrolled in the study. The improvement of diagnostic accuracy was 0.30 in the Sonazoid group and 0.16 in the SonoVue group (95% confidence interval, -0.828-0.168; P = .24). Using 20% as the noninferiority margin, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (0.168) was less than 0.20. The number of lesions detected during the whole-liver scanning in the Sonazoid group was significantly more than that detected in the SonoVue group (P = .024).

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis value of Sonazoid is noninferior to SonoVue, and this new contrast agent can improves the whole-liver image quality.

Influence of Data Parsing on Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound Exams

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the influence of data parsing (either selection of frames at set time intervals or by an experienced sonographer) of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) exams on physician diagnoses and confidence levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty consecutive CEUS exams consisting of 10 cases each of indeterminate liver lesions, indeterminate renal lesions, renal cell carcinoma postablation follow-up, and hepatocellular carcinoma postchemoembolization follow-up were selected for analysis. Exams were parsed into sets consisting of five images selected by the performing sonographer and sets containing systematically stored frames every 10, 30, and 60 seconds. Three blinded physicians then reviewed the cine loop and each set of images in randomized order and provided a diagnosis and confidence level.

RESULTS

For all clinical applications investigated, no statistically significant differences in diagnostic performance measures or reader confidence were observed between review of the entire cine loop and images selected by the performing sonographer (p > 0.42). Diagnostic performance at 10-second intervals did not show statically significant changes compared to the full cine loop review for all applications (p > 0.18), although reader confidence decreased. At 30-60-second intervals, both diagnostic performance and reader confidence showed statistically significant reduction compared to review of the full cine loop (p < 0.045).

CONCLUSIONS

Transfer and review of large cine loops from CEUS exams represent a potential barrier to adoption within the United States workflows. This study demonstrates that images selected by a performing trained sonographer may provide the same value without the review time and data storage costs needed for full cine loop review. Parsing by time points reduced reader confidence and diagnostic performance.

A Pilot Study on Diagnostic Performance of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Detection of Early Cervical Cancer

In this cohort study of 49 women with all stages of cervical cancer and 21 healthy controls, we compared contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) filling pattern and semi-quantitative parameters in the two groups. Participants were examined with conventional grayscale and power Doppler ultrasound (US) followed by CEUS, using a 2.5 mL bolus of intravenous contrast agent. CEUS video clips were analyzed with regard to contrast distribution (focal or global) and semi-quantitative parameters. Focal contrast distribution was found in 3% (1/32) of the women with no tumor versus 89% (34/38) of women with histologically detectable tumor. A semi-quantitative analysis showed that the amount of contrast over a period of the whole tumor (area under the curve [AUC[ 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.0), and the maximal intensity area (AUC 0.94, 95% CI 0.84-1.0) could accurately distinguish tumors from healthy tissue. In conclusion, the CEUS parameters differ significantly between tumors and healthy cervical tissue.

Contribution of 3-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography (CEUS) Compared With 2-Dimensional CEUS in the Analysis of Liver Tumors

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we investigated the vascular characteristics of liver tumors on 3-dimensional (3D) and 2-dimensional (2D) contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). The clinical value of these CEUS methods in the diagnosis of benign and malignant liver tumors was evaluated and compared.

METHODS

A total of 126 liver tumors were examined by conventional ultrasonography (US), 2D CEUS, and dynamic 3D CEUS (frequency range, 1-6 MHz; focusing ability, 2-25 cm in depth; mechanical index, 0.09). Dynamic 3D CEUS images were postprocessed with high-resolution intelligent tomographic technology. The sensitivity and specificity of the CEUS methods in differentiating benign and malignant liver tumors were compared, as were the vascular characteristics (including the number and spatial relationships of the tumor vessels, such as origin and continuity) of the tumors in the arterial phase.

RESULTS

The imaging methods did not significantly differ in their sensitivity and specificity for differentiating benign and malignant liver tumors (P > .05). Dynamic 3D CEUS was significantly better than 2D CEUS in revealing the vascular characteristics of the tumors (P < .05). The vascular morphologic characteristics of benign and malignant hepatic tumors in the arterial phase of dynamic 3D CEUS using intelligent tomographic technology differed significantly (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Dynamic 3D CEUS of liver tumors provides a more intuitive and comprehensive view of the spatial relationships of their blood vessels, including their peripheral and internal distribution. The volume information obtained with dynamic 3D CEUS combined with intelligent tomographic technology can improve the US-based diagnosis of liver tumors and thus guide their treatment.

Contrast-enhanced US for characterization of focal liver lesions: a comprehensive meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in differentiating malignant from benign focal liver lesions (FLLs).

METHODS

Cochrane Library, PubMed and Web of Science databases were systematically searched and checked for studies using CEUS in characterization of FLLs. Data necessary to construct 2×2 contingency tables were extracted from included studies. The QUADAS tool was utilized to assess the methodologic quality of the studies. Meta-analysis included data pooling, subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias was comprehensively performed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven studies were included in this meta-analysis and the overall diagnostic accuracy in characterization of FLLs was as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.92 (95%CI: 0.91-0.93); pooled specificity, 0.87 (95%CI: 0.86-0.88); diagnostic odds ratio, 104.20 (95%CI: 70.42-154.16). Subgroup analysis indicated higher diagnostic accuracy of the second-generation contrast agents (CAs) than the first-generation CA (Levovist; DOR: 118.27 vs. 62.78). Furthermore, Sonazoid demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy among three major CAs (SonoVue, Levovist and Sonazoid; DOR: 118.82 vs. 62.78 vs. 227.39). No potential publication bias was observed of the included studies.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is an accurate tool to stratify the risk of malignancy in FLLs. The second-generation CAs, especially Sonazoid may greatly improve diagnostic performance.

KEY POINTS

• CEUS shows excellent diagnostic accuracy in differentiating malignant from benign FLLs. • The second-generation CAs have higher diagnostic accuracy than first-generation CAs. • Sonazoid demonstrates the highest diagnostic accuracy among three major CAs.

The Use of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for the Characterization of Focal Liver Lesions

Focal liver lesions often occur with or without an underlying liver disease. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can aid in characterizing liver lesions, potentially avoiding biopsy and computed tomography procedures. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has a high sensitivity and specificity for differentiating characteristics of liver lesions compared with noncontrast sonography. The different contrast characteristics aid in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. Malignant lesions tend to have washout of contrast in the venous phases, whereas benign lesions have hyperenhancement during the venous phases. Therefore, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography should be considered an essential component of the diagnostic process for diagnosing and following focal liver lesions.

The Practice of Using Contrast Sonography for the Differential Diagnosis of Liver Neoplasms

Purpose: to improve the differential diagnosis of benign liver rumors and the liver metastasis of colorectal cancer with the ultrasound using contrast sonography.

Materials and methods.There were evaluated 92 patients with liver neoplasms (44 (47.8%) women and 48 (52.2%) men) age 41 to 83, with a mean age of 62.8 ± 2.64. Ultrasound exam was carried out in three stages: I stage – liver ultrasound in B-mode, II stage – ultrasound in B-mode with addition of color Doppler imaging and power Doppler scanning, III stage – contrast liver sonography employing the contrast agent SonoVue (Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy). According to the results of the examination the patients were either surgically treated if there were indications, or the nature of the neoplasm was verified via the needle biopsy. Thus the patients formed two groups: I group (n = 35 (38.0%) – patients with benign liver neoplasms: cavernous hemangiomas – 17, hepatocellular adenomas – 3, focal modular hyperplasia of the liver – 5; II group (n = 57 (62.0%) – patients with metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Results.With the use of the ultrasound in B-mode with addition of color Doppler imaging and power Doppler scanning in patients from group I (n = 35) with benign tumors of the liver – bilobar involvement in 2 cases, right lobe involvement in 28 cases, left lobe involvement in 5 cases. There were found both solitary (in 33 cases) and multiple (in 2 cases) neoplasms ranging from 2.5– 4.5 cm to conglomerates of 8–17 cm in diameter. In group II (n = 57), in patients with colorectal cancer metastasis who had an ultrasound examination in B-mode with addition of color Doppler imaging and power Doppler scanning, bilobar metastatic (91.2%) involvement of the liver prevailed over the monolobar, notably right lobe (84.21%) involvement was more frequent. Multiple metastasis were encountered more often (89.5%) then solitary. At the moment of metastatic liver disease discovery the size of the tumor nodules was over 5 cm in diameter in 33 (57.8%) patients. According to the results of contrast sonography in patients of group I (n = 35) with benign tumors of the liver, there was detected a prolonged enhancement of the neoplasm in the arterial, portal and delayed phases of enhancement. In patients of group II (n = 57) with metastasis of colorectal cancer to the liver, in the end of arterial phase there was noted a “washing out” of the contrast agent by 16th second – in 36 (63.1%) of the patients, by 23th se cond – in 17 (29.8%) and by the 26th second – in 4 (7.0%) of the patients. In portal and delayed phase of the enhancement all of the group II patients (100%) at the site of the metastasis there were located anechogenic round foci.

Conclusions. 1. Complex 3-stage ultrasound examination (B-mode, color Doppler imaging and power Doppler scanning, contrast sonography) of the liver neoplasms allows to get a more detailed information and differentiate benign and metastatic disease of the liver; 2. During contrast sonography the benign liver tumors “keep” the contrast gent during the arterial, portal and delayed enhancement phases, but with metastasis in liver the contrast agent gets “washed out” already in the arterial phase of enhancement.

Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography guidance improves the quality of pathological diagnosis in the biopsy of focal hepatic lesions

BACKGROUND/AIM

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (US) has improved the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. Recently, the importance of obtaining high-quality samples in the biopsy of hepatic lesions has been increasing not only in the field of pathological diagnosis but also in molecular analysis for predicting the effectiveness of anticancer agents and molecular targeted drugs. We evaluated the utility of Sonazoid-enhanced ultrasonography (SEUS) in guiding percutaneous biopsy of focal hepatic lesions by comparing the results of histopathological diagnosis between B-mode US and SEUS guidance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective study examined 121 focal hepatic lesions in 108 patients (mean age: 63.8 years) referred for US-guided percutaneous biopsy. The technical success rate was defined as the percentage of the lesions diagnosed clearly at the initial biopsy.

RESULTS

Among 121 lesions, 56 lesions were subjected to biopsy with B-mode US guidance whereas 65 were subjected to SEUS guidance. The technical success rate was significantly higher under SEUS guidance than under B-mode US guidance (92.3 vs. 76.8%, respectively, P<0.05). When biopsies were performed to diagnose or rule out malignancy in indeterminate lesions, the technical success rate was also significantly higher under SEUS guidance than under B-mode US guidance (100 vs. 73.9%, respectively, P<0.05). SEUS guidance resulted in a significantly higher rate of successful single-puncture attempts compared with B-mode US guidance (55.4 vs. 35.7%, respectively, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

SEUS guidance is recommended for more accurate localization of suitable hepatic lesion biopsy areas as it increases conspicuity and differentiates viable areas from denaturalization or necrosis.

Visualization of Small-Diameter Vessels by Reduction of Incoherent Reverberation With Coherent Flow Power Doppler

Power Doppler (PD) imaging is a widely used technique for flow detection. Despite the wide use of Doppler ultrasound, limitations exist in the ability of Doppler ultrasound to assess slow flow in the small-diameter vasculature, such as the maternal spiral arteries and fetal villous arteries of the placenta and focal liver lesions. The sensitivity of PD in small vessel detection is limited by the low signal produced by slow flow and the noise associated with small vessels. The noise sources include electronic noise, stationary or slowly moving tissue clutter, reverberation clutter, and off-axis scattering from tissue, among others. In order to provide more sensitive detection of slow flow in small diameter vessels, a coherent flow imaging technique, termed coherent flow PD (CFPD), is characterized and evaluated with simulation, flow phantom experiment studies, and an in vivo animal small vessel detection study. CFPD imaging was introduced as a technique to detect slow blood flow. It has been demonstrated to detect slow flow below the detection threshold of conventional PD imaging using identical pulse sequences and filter parameters. In this paper, we compare CFPD with PD in the detection of blood flow in small-diameter vessels. The results from the study suggest that CFPD is able to provide a 7.5-12.5-dB increase in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) over PD images for the same physiological conditions and is less susceptible to reverberation clutter and thermal noise. Due to the increase in SNR, CFPD is able to detect small vessels in high channel noise cases, for which PD was unable to generate enough contrast to observe the vessel.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic findings of serum amyloid A-positive hepatocellular neoplasm: Does hepatocellular adenoma arise in cirrhotic liver?

Hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) was recently classified into four pathological subtypes. There have been few studies describing the findings of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) of each type. Our case concerns a 78-year-old man who had undergone routine medical check-ups for hepatitis C for 11 years. Abdominal ultrasonography showed a 28 mm, hypo-echoic mass in the segment 4 of the liver. His integrating amount of drinking was 670 kg convert into ethanol. CEUS with Sonazoid demonstrated mild uniform hypo-enhancement with inflow of microbubbles from the periphery of the tumor in the arterial phase, and heterogeneously hypo-enhancement in the post vascular phase. Because the mass increased in size within 3 mo, a well differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma was suspected, and hepatic resection was performed. Microscopic findings showed homogeneous cell proliferation with low grade atypia, infiltration of inflammatory cells, ductular reactions, fatty deposit in part, and sinusoidal dilation. Immunohistochemistry revealed geographic positive for serum amyloid A (SAA), focal positive for glutamine synthetase, diffuse and strong positive for C-reactive protein, and positive for liver-type fatty acid binding protein. These pathological features corresponded to that of an inflammatory HCA. However, we could not make a clear diagnosis, because HCAs were defined as not to arise in cirrhotic liver. Finally, this tumor was diagnosed as a SAA positive hepatocellular neoplasm.

Contrast enhancement ultrasound application in focal liver lesions characterization: a retrospective study about guidelines application (SOCEUS-CEUS survey)

INTRODUCTION

The SOCEUS survey aims to evaluate how contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is effectively used in the focal liver lesions characterization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the survey were involved Verona, Brescia and Trieste Radiological Centers and Arezzo and Bologna Non-radiological Centers. Inclusion criteria were liver focal lesion detection at conventional ultrasound and studied by means of CEUS, with or without CT or MRI examinations, done previous or subsequent to CEUS.

RESULTS

1069 forms were collected. Patients with benign lesions, who did not undergo any other studies, were 255/561 (45.5 %). Among patients with diagnosis of hemangioma at CEUS, those who had no other investigations were 129/267 (48.3 %). Patients with malignant lesions who had studies pre-CEUS (CT and/or MRI) were 328/508 (65 %), whereas those who had examinations post-CEUS (CT and/or MRI) were 218/508 (42.9 %). Concordance rate between CEUS and CT investigations pre- and post-CEUS was, respectively, 66 and 89 %. Concordance rate between CEUS and MRI studies pre- and post-CEUS was, respectively, 87.5 and 81.5 %.

CONCLUSION

This study proves contrast-enhanced ultrasound correct application in the involved centers.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound of Focal Liver Lesions

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this article is to discuss the use of contrast-enhanced ultra-sound (CEUS) in focal liver lesions.

CONCLUSION

Focal liver lesions are usually detected incidentally during abdominal ultrasound. The injection of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents improves the characterization of focal liver lesions that are indeterminate on conventional ultrasound. The use of CEUS is recommended in official guidelines and suggested as a second diagnostic step after ultrasound detection of indeterminate focal liver lesions to immediately establish the diagnosis, especially for benign liver lesions, such as hemangiomas, avoiding further and more expensive examinations.

Diagnosis of Hepatic Angiomyolipoma by Combination of Baseline and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound--A Prospective Study in Non-Cirrhotic Patients

Objectives

Hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML) is a rare, benign mesenchymal tumor of the liver and its diagnosis has been considered challenging. The aim of this study was to investigate prospectively the diagnostic efficacy of the incorporation of both baseline ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) features of HAML in patients without cirrhosis.

Materials and Methods

Consecutive 1748 non-cirrhotic patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs) were prospectively enrolled. Baseline US and CEUS were performed before resection or biopsy. Ultrasound imaging diagnosis of FLLs was compared with the pathological results.

Results

Final diagnoses were established in 41 patients with HAML (2.3%) with normal alpha fetal protein (AFP) level and in 1707 patients with FLL other than HAML. Diagnostic criteria for HAML was based on the combination of baseline US and CEUS appearance of the nodule: (1) Well-defined, marked hyper-echoic nodule without surrounding hypo-echoic halo on baseline US; (2) hyper-enhancement in the arterial phase (exclude initial peripheral nodular enhancement and spoke-wheel arteries) and remains hyper-enhancement or iso-enhancement in the late phase. The diagnostic criteria were fulfilled in 31 HAMLs, 1 hepatocellular adenoma and 1 hemangioma. Ten HAMLs were misdiagnosed as other liver tumors because they did not meet the diagnostic criteria mentioned above and consequently yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, negative predictive values and Youden index of 75.61%, 99.88%, 93.94%, 99.42%, and 0.75 respectively.

Conclusion

The combination of baseline US and CEUS may lead to the correct diagnosis noninvasively in the majority of HAMLs in non-cirrhotic patients with normal AFP level.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using real-time contrast harmonic imaging in invasive breast cancer: comparison of enhancement dynamics with three different doses of contrast agent

BACKGROUND

In the last few years new potential applications have been developed for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and the management of breast diseases, but there is still some debate concerning the optimal dose to evaluate breast lesions, especially as a diagnostic tool.

PURPOSE

To compare different CEUS doses of injected contrast agent in order to establish an optimal dose for the diagnosis of invasive breast cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In Group A we compared the bolus dose of 1.2 mL vs. 2.4 mL and in Group B we compared the bolus dose of 2.4 mL vs. 4.8 mL (26 and 25 invasive carcinomas, respectively). CEUS was performed in real-time contrast harmonic imaging (CHI) using a L9-3 MHz probe. All examinations were recorded in a contrast side/side imaging mode loop for 120 s. Wash-in and wash-out patterns of the contrast agent were analyzed with advanced US quantification software and kinetic curves were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In Group B (2.4 mL vs. 4.8 mL), more and stronger correlation was found among kinetic parameters (area under the curve, P < 0.00001; lognormal model parameters, μ, P = 0.0007 and σ, P < 0.0001; mean transit time, P < 0.0001; model-based wash-out ratios, W21m, P = 0.0002; W50m, P = 0.0001; time-to-peak, P = 0.005) as compared to Group A (1.2 mL vs. 2.4 mL).

CONCLUSION

The optimal way to evaluate kinetic features of invasive breast tumors using real-time CEUS is with an injection of contrast agent of either 2.4 mL or 4.8 mL.

Efficacy of contrast enhanced grey scale ultrasound in characterisation of hepatic focal lesions: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has recently gained widespread acceptance as an adjunct to conventional grey scale ultrasound. The present pilot study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of this technique in characterisation of hepatic focal lesions.

METHODS

Adult patients who had at least one focal liver lesion underwent ultrasound evaluation in regular and contrast mode before and after intravenous administration of sulphur hexafluoride. The diagnoses were confirmed by comparison with a reference standard (multidetector CT), response to treatment or pathological correlation.

RESULTS

The rate of correct diagnosis for unenhanced ultrasound was 54%, CEUS was 72% and multidetector CT (MDCT) was 92%. A comparison of unenhanced ultrasound versus CEUS using the McNemar test yielded a p value of 0.0704 (>0.05). However, comparison of CEUS versus MDCT using the McNemar test yielded a p value of 0.0265 (<0.05). Additionally, comparison of unenhanced ultrasound versus MDCT using the McNemar test yielded a p value of <0.0001.

CONCLUSION

CEUS increases diagnostic efficacy over unenhanced ultrasound but does not have any significant advantages over MDCT. Currently it may be used as a problem solving tool in atypical haemangiomas, echogenic focal liver lesions, contrast sensitivity and to avoid multiple studies utilising ionising radiation.

Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia from hepatocellular adenomas with low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS): effect of size on diagnostic confidence

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) for the differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) according to lesion size.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients with a definite diagnosis of FNH or HCA who underwent CEUS were included in this institutional review board (IRB)-approved study. A total of 43 FNHs and 20 HCAs, including 15 inflammatory HCAs and five unclassified HCAs, were analysed. Two radiologists reviewed the diagnostic CEUS parameters separately and in consensus, including the presence or absence of centrifugal filling and central vessels. The sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), and inter-observer confidence (Kappa) of CEUS diagnostic parameters were assessed.

RESULTS

Inter-observer agreement of CEUS for FNH diagnosis was high (kappa = 0.81) with an overall Se of 67.4% [29/43 (CI 95%: 51.4-80.1 %)] and an Sp of 100% [20/20 (CI 95%: 81-100%)]. Significantly higher Se figures were found for lesions ≤ 35 mm than for lesions > 35 mm [respectively, 93 % (28/30) (CI 95%: 77.6-99.2) vs. 7.7% (1/13) (CI 95%: 0.2-36%), p = 0.002] with unchanged specificity.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is highly specific for the diagnosis of FNH, with very good inter-observer agreement, whatever the size, but its sensitivity is significantly reduced in diagnosing lesions larger than 35 mm.

KEY POINTS

• CEUS is highly specific for the diagnosis of FNH, regardless of lesion size • CEUS shows reduced sensitivity in diagnosing FNH lesions larger than 35 mm • The filling patterns of hepatocellular adenomas are not affected by lesion size.

Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound distinguish malignant from reactive lymph nodes in patients with head and neck cancers?

The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differentiating benign from malignant cervical lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A consecutive series of 17 patients with known head and neck malignancy scheduled for neck surgery and lymph node clearance were recruited for contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluation. Sonographic signal intensity as a function of time, comparing features of time to peak, time to arrival and time to wash-out, was quantified. The selected node was removed surgically and submitted for histology. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination had 100% sensitivity and 85.7% specificity for lymph node involvement. Functional analysis revealed contrast peaks significantly earlier in the malignant nodes (mean ± standard deviation) of 24.14 ± 2.7 s compared with 29.33 ± 3.4 s (p = 0.0128). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound holds promise in the detection and characterization of metastatic nodes that would not be diagnosed as abnormal on the basis of conventional ultrasound criteria.

Contrast ultrasound in hepatocellular carcinoma at a tertiary liver center: First Indian experience

AIM: To assess the role of contrast enhanced ultrasonography in evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at the first Indian tertiary liver center.

METHODS: Retrospective analysis of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations over 24 mo for diagnosis, surveillance, characterization and follow up of 50 patients in the context of HCC was performed. The source and indication of referrals, change in referral rate, accuracy and usefulness of CEUS in a tertiary liver center equipped with a 64 slice dual energy computer tomography (CT) and 3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were studied. Sonovue (BR1, Bracco, Italy, a second generation contrast agent) was used for contrast US studies. Contrast enhanced CT/MRI or both were performed in all patients. The findings were taken as a baseline reference and correlation was done with respect to contrast US. Contrast enhanced MRI was performed using hepatocyte specific gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA). Iomeron (400 mg; w/v) was used for dynamic CT examinations.

RESULTS: About 20 (40%) of the examinations were referred from clinicians for characterization of a mass from previous imaging. About 15 (30%) were performed for surveillance in chronic liver disease; 5 (10%) examinations were performed for monitoring lesions after radiofrequency ablation (RFA); 3 (6%) were post trans-arterial chemo-embolization (TACE) assessments and 3 (6%) were patients with h/o iodinated contrast allergy. About 2 (4%) were performed on hemodynamically unstable patients in the intensive care with raised alpha fetoprotein and 2 (4%) patients were claustrophobic. The number of patients referred from clinicians steadily increased from 12 in the first 12 mo of the study to 38 in the last 12 mo. CEUS was able to diagnose 88% of positive cases of HCC as per reference standards. In the surveillance group, specificity was 53.3% vs 100% by CT/MRI. Post RFA and TACE specificity of lesion characterization by CEUS was 100% in single/large mass assessment, similar to CT/MRI. For non HCC lesions such as regenerative and dysplastic nodules, the specificity was 50% vs 90% by CT/MRI. The positive role of CEUS in imaging spectrum of HCC included a provisional urgent diagnosis of an incidentally detected mass. It further led to a decrease in time for further management. A confident diagnosis on CEUS was possible in cases of characterization of an indeterminate mass, in situations where the patient was unfit for CT/MRI, was allergic to iodinated contrast or had claustrophobia, etc. CEUS was also cost effective, radiation free and an easy modality for monitoring post RFA or TACE lesions.

CONCLUSION: CEUS is a valuable augmentation to the practice of ultrasonography, and an irreplaceable modality for confounding cases and interpretation of indeterminate lesions in imaging of HCC.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

International guidelines of Ultrasound recommend the performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) as the first method of choice after conventional ultrasound for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions. However, these recommendations are based on the results of multiple single studies and only few large multicentre studies.

AIMS

The rationale of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions.

METHODS

Literature databases were searched up to March 2012. Inclusion criteria were evaluation of CEUS, assessment of sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model based on the DerSimonian Laird method. Quality analyses were carried out to assess sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 45 studies with 8147 focal liver lesions were included in the analysis. Overall sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of malignant liver lesions was 93% (95%-CI: 91-95%) and 90% (95%-CI: 88-92%) respectively. Significant heterogeneity was found between studies. However, subanalysis revealed no significant difference when evaluating studies using histology for all liver lesions, when comparing high-quality and low-quality studies, and blinded vs non-blinded studies.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis support the international recommendations on CEUS for the diagnostic work-up of focal liver lesions selecting patients who need further diagnostics.

Application of a second-generation US contrast agent in infants and children--a European questionnaire-based survey

BACKGROUND

No US contrast agent (US-CA) is currently licensed for use in children.

OBJECTIVE

To survey the off-label use in children of a second-generation US-CA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Questionnaires were e-mailed to European paediatric radiologists, who were asked about their experience with the second-generation US-CA Sonovue® (Bracco, Milan, Italy). Number of examinations per indication and adverse effects were recorded. Examinations were categorised by intravenous or intracavitary use of US-CA.

RESULTS

Out of 146 respondents, 88 stated that they did not perform contrast-enhanced US in children, but 36 of these (44%) would appreciate paediatric approval. Forty-five centres reported 5,079 examinations in children (age mean: 2.9 years; range: birth-18 years, M/F: 1/ 2.8). The majority (4,131 [81%] in 29 centres) were intravesical applications. The minority (948 [19%] in 30 centres) were intravenous applications. No adverse effects had been recorded from intravesical use. Six minor adverse effects (skin reaction, unusual taste, hyperventilation) had been recorded after five intravenous studies (0.52%).

CONCLUSION

Responses suggest a favourable safety profile of this second-generation US-CA in children. It also demonstrates a demand for such US-CA from paediatric radiologists.

Role of contrast-enhanced sonography in differentiation of subtypes of hepatocellular adenoma: correlation with MRI findings

OBJECTIVE

Hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) are divided into three subtypes according to genotype and phenotype. The two main subgroups are hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α (HNF1α)-inactivated HCA and inflammatory HCA. Specific imaging features of these subgroups of adenoma have been delineated with MRI. The aim of this study was to document the contrast-enhanced sonographic (CEUS) features specific for adenoma subtypes and to correlate them with MRI findings.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data on 38 patients with HCA confirmed at pathologic examination in all cases. All cases were classified with MRI.

RESULTS

HNF1α-inactivated HCA (n = 16) was found to have a homogeneous hyperechoic aspect at baseline gray-scale sonography, isovascularity or moderate hypervascularity with mixed filling in the arterial phase, and isoechogenicity in the portal and late portal venous phases. Homogeneous hyperechogenicity during B-mode sonography was the most specific pattern (sensitivity, 88%; specificity, 91%) and correlated with diffuse fat repartition observed on MR images obtained with chemical-shift sequences. In inflammatory HCA (n = 17) the association of arterial hypervascularity with centripetal filling, linear vascularities, peripheral rim of sustained enhancement, and central washout in the late venous phase was specific (sensitivity, 64%; specificity, 100%). Discrepancy between delayed washout during CEUS and sustained enhancement during MRI could be related to differences between gadolinium and microbubbles in diffusing in the interstitial spaces. In the five other HCA cases (four unclassified, one β-catenin activated) CEUS showed characteristics of benign hepatocellular tumors with no specific features.

CONCLUSION

HNF1α-inactivated HCA and inflammatory HCA had characteristic CEUS patterns. Delayed washout, an unusual finding in benign hepatic lesions, is of particular interest and was a characteristic of inflammatory HCA subtype.

Obstruction at middle hepatic venous tributaries in modified right lobe grafts after living-donor liver Transplantation: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced US

PURPOSE

To investigate the ability of contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) to help diagnose obstruction of middle hepatic venous (MHV) tributaries soon after living-donor liver transplantation with modified right lobe grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The institutional review board approved the study and waived requirement for informed consent. Sixty-five consecutive patients (48 men, 17 women; mean age, 52.8 years; range, 33-69 years) who underwent living-donor liver transplantation with modified right lobe grafts between February and May 2009 were included. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced US and Doppler US on postoperative day 1 and underwent computed tomography (CT) within 7 days after US. At contrast-enhanced US, parenchymal enhancement patterns in the territory of each MHV tributary during arterial and portal venous phases were evaluated. With use of most frequent enhancement patterns in patients with obstruction at MHV tributaries as a criterion, diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced US was compared with that of Doppler US for diagnosis of obstruction at MHV tributaries; CT was the reference standard. Generalized estimating equations were used to adjust for data clustering.

RESULTS

Of 148 MHV tributaries in 65 patients, 36 (24.3%) in 31 patients were diagnosed as obstructed at CT. With arterial high echogenicity or portal low echogenicity used as a criterion for hepatic venous obstruction, contrast-enhanced US had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 91% (33 of 36), 97% (109 of 112), and 95% (142 of 148), respectively, whereas Doppler US had values of 83% (30 of 36), 86% (97 of 112), and 85% (127 of 148), respectively. Contrast-enhanced US was significantly more specific and accurate than Doppler US for diagnosis of obstruction at MHV tributaries (P=.024 and .01, respectively). Arterial high echogenicity was noted only in the hepatic venous obstruction group.

CONCLUSION

Contrast-enhanced US can help accurately assess hepatic venous obstruction at MHV tributaries after living-donor liver transplantation with a modified right lobe graft. Contrast-enhanced US was significantly more specific than Doppler US, with arterial hyperenhancement in the affected area being specific to hepatic venous obstruction.

Semiquantitative strain elastography of liver masses

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine the utility of semiquantitative strain elastography in differential diagnosis of solid liver masses.

METHODS

A total of 103 patients with focal liver masses underwent abdominal sonographic examinations and freehand elastography of focal hepatic lesions. Eighty-two patients (79.7%) with 93 focal hepatic lesions were included in the study. Twenty-one patients (20.3%) were excluded from the study because of technical limitations of semi-quantitative strain elastography and difficulty in detection of normal liver parenchyma on gray-scale sonography. We evaluated different focal hepatic lesions such as hemangiomas, focal nodular hyperplasia, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, adenomas, hepatocellular carcinomas, metastases, and cholangiocarcinomas. The stiffness of the lesions was determined by measurement of strain values on semiquantitative strain elastography. The strain index value (strain ratio of liver parenchyma and focal lesions) of each lesion was calculated. Mean strain index values of benign and malignant liver lesions were compared.

RESULTS

The mean strain index value of malignant liver lesions ± SD (2.82 ± 1.82) was significantly higher than that of benign liver lesions (1.45 ± 1.28; P< .0001). Hemangiomas had a significantly lower mean strain index value than other benign lesions (P < .0034). There was no statistically significant difference between strain index values of different types of malignant lesions (P > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Semiquantitative strain elastography may be helpful for differentiating benign and malignant liver masses. The substantial overlap between strain index values of benign and malignant liver masses limits clinical usefulness of this technique.

Pancreatic multicenter ultrasound study (PAMUS)

AIM

To describe the typical CEUS pattern of pancreatic lesions and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in their characterization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All US and CEUS examinations of focal pancreatic masses performed in six centers during a period of five years were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: focal pancreatic mass pathologically proved, visible at ultrasound (US) and studied with CEUS. All lesions were then evaluated for size, aspect and enhancement pattern. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values with 95% CIs were calculated to define diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in respect to pathology. Diagnostic confidence of US and CEUS, discerning between benign and malignant lesions, were represented by using ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curves. Agreement was evaluated by means of k statistics.

RESULTS

1439 pancreatic lesions were included. At CEUS the lesions were divided into solid (89%) and cystic (12%) masses and classified into six and eight categories, respectively. Among the solid lesions, adenocarcinomas were characterized with an accuracy of 87.8%. Among the cystic lesions, cystic tumors were diagnosed with an accuracy of 97.1%. ROC curve area increased from 0.637 for US to 0.877 for CEUS (p<0.0001). Inter-observer agreement was slightly higher for solid (k=0.78) than cystic (k=0.62) lesions. In none of the centers side effects were reported.

CONCLUSION

CEUS is accurate in the characterization of pancreatic lesions. CEUS should be considered as a complementary imaging method for pancreatic lesions characterization.

Characterisation of focal liver lesions with unenhanced and contrast enhanced low MI real time ultrasound: on-site unblinded versus off-site blinded reading

OBJECTIVE

To compare on-site and blinded off-site reading of baseline ultrasound (US) and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for classification and characterisation of focal liver lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

99 patients (57 women and 42 men, age range 18-89 years, mean age: 59 years) with 53 malignant and 46 benign liver lesions were studied with unenhanced US followed by contrast enhanced US after injection of 2.4 ml SonoVue® (Bracco, Milano, Italy). Image interpretation was performed on-site with clinical information available by consensus of two readers and off-site by two independent blinded readers at two different centers. Comparison of pre and post contrast scans and of the different readers was performed. Reference examinations were histology, intraoperative US, MRI or CT.

RESULTS

Sensitivity for malignancy improved from 81/89/66% (on-site/off-site reader 1/2) before to 100/96/96% post contrast administration (p<0.05, except for reader 1). Specificity improved from 48/48/54% on baseline US to 89/80/76% on CEUS (p<0.05). Accuracy for specific lesion diagnosis was 62/59/50% pre and 90/77/72% post contrast (p<0.05). Classification and characterisation post contrast were mildly inferior for off-site reading. Agreement between on-site and off-site readers of unenhanced scans was fair (κ=0.29-0.39) while it was good for CEUS (κ=0.63-0.79).

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS improves classification and characterisation of focal liver lesions and interobserver agreement compared to conventional US. Classification and characterisation post contrast were mildly but statistically significantly better for on-site than for off-site reading.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in oncology

In patients with known malignant disease, 51% of liver lesions less than 1.5 cm turn out to be benign. Whether the probability of malignancy is high or low, further investigations are often necessary to definitely exclude malignancy. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography has a prominent role in lesion characterization with a diagnostic accuracy comparable with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Anti-angiogenic treatment is common in most oncological institutions and the response evaluation is a new challenge with a research focus on the change in tumour vasculature and perfusion. In planning biopsies, CEUS can identify necrotic and viable areas of tumours and improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Value of contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

To illustrate contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasonography (CEUS) findings of peripheral intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (PICC) and to assess the usefulness of CEUS in the diagnosis of this disease.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective analysis of 46 patients (20 men, 26 women) with PICC who underwent both preoperative CEUS and pathologic examination. Sonographic examinations were performed with sonographic instruments equipped with low mechanical index contrast imaging software. The contrast agent SonoVue was used. The wash-in and wash-out features of the lesions were documented and the enhancement patterns were analyzed by visual inspection of the real-time cine loops.

RESULTS

During the hepatic arterial phase of CEUS, the majority of PICC lesions (43/46, 93.5%) showed hypervascularity compared with the liver parenchyma, whereas three lesions (3/46, 6.5%) showed hypovascularity. In the portal phases, all lesions were either isoechoic or hypoechoic, while they were all hypoechoic in the late phase. Of all the hypervascular lesions, 48.8% (21/43) showed diffuse enhancement and 51.2% (22/43) showed rim-like or thick, rim-like enhancement. In 62.8% (27/43) of cases, progressive dendritic and centripetal fill-in of the contrast agent was observed. There were 83.7% (36/43) of hypervascular nodules showing heterogeneous enhancement during peak contrast enhancement of the lesions. CEUS provided clearer visualization of lesion margins than did conventional sonography.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS examination yields some specific findings that are useful in the diagnosis of PICC.

Surveillance of a coiled renal artery aneurysm by contrast-enhanced ultrasound with Definity

Imaging surveillance is necessary to assess for long-term procedural outcomes after endovascular treatment. This is generally performed by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has recognized utility for cardiovascular and abdominal applications and is an alternative option in patients with renal impairment or CT/MR contrast-related reactions. We believe that we present the first reported case of CEUS in the surveillance of a treated renal artery aneurysm. The 57-year-old patient had a severe CT contrast allergy. CEUS performed with Definity microbubble ultrasound contrast (Lantheus Medical Imaging, Billerica, Mass) was well tolerated and showed no residual filling of the aneurysm.

Differentiation of focal liver lesions: usefulness of parametric imaging with contrast-enhanced US

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether parametric imaging with contrast material-enhanced ultrasonography (US) is superior to visual assessment for the differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions (FLLs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study had institutional review board approval, and verbal patient informed consent was obtained. Between August 2005 and October 2008, 146 FLLs in 145 patients (63 women, 82 men; mean age, 62.5 years; age range, 22-89 years) were imaged with real-time low-mechanical-index contrast-enhanced US after a bolus injection of 2.4 mL of a second-generation contrast agent. Clips showing contrast agent uptake kinetics (including arterial, portal, and late phases) were recorded and subsequently analyzed off-line with dedicated image processing software. Analysis of the dynamic vascular patterns (DVPs) of lesions with respect to adjacent parenchyma allowed mapping DVP signatures on a single parametric image. Cine loops of contrast-enhanced US and results from parametric imaging of DVP were assessed separately by three independent off-site readers who classified each lesion as benign, malignant, or indeterminate. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for both techniques. Interobserver agreement (κ statistics) was determined.

RESULTS

Sensitivities for visual interpretation of cine loops for the three readers were 85.0%, 77.9%, and 87.6%, which improved significantly to 96.5%, 97.3%, and 96.5% for parametric imaging, respectively (P < .05, McNemar test), while retaining high specificity (90.9% for all three readers). Accuracy scores of parametric imaging were higher than those of conventional contrast-enhanced US for all three readers (P < .001, McNemar test). Interobserver agreement increased with DVP parametric imaging compared with conventional contrast-enhanced US (change of κ from 0.54 to 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Parametric imaging of DVP improves diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced US in the differentiation between malignant and benign FLLs; it also provides excellent interobserver agreement.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for focal liver lesions: a meta-analysis

The diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) was determined in patients with focal liver lesions (FLLs) in a meta-analysis. Meta-Disc version 1.4 was used to describe and calculate sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC). In the 25 included studies, the pooled estimate of CEUS studies for sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 87% (95% CI 85-88), 89% (95% CI 87-91) and 78.84 (95% CI 29.40-211.40), respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 86% (95% CI 84-88), 82% (95% CI 77-86) and 26.34 (95% CI 8.32-83.39), respectively, for the CECT studies. Sensitivity, specificity and DOR were 85% (95% CI 82-88), 87% (95% CI 83-91) and 48.37 (95% CI 15.87-147.45), respectively, for the CEMRI studies. SROC analysis indicated that the diagnostic value of CEUS for FLLs is not significantly different from that of CECT and CEMRI.

Source and clinical motivation of orders for contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) of the liver: A prospective single-center survey

Contrast-enhanced sonography (CEUS) has become a routine part of diagnostic imaging of the liver. Its possibilities, limitations, and indications have been defined in adequately large clinical series and in guidelines and recommendations. We prospectively evaluated physicians' orders for hepatic CEUS received in the radiology department of a large oncology center in Naples, Italy from May 2009 to April 2010. Radiologists performing the CEUS examinations filled out a form that included patient demography, source and type of patient referral, and clinical indications for the examination. During the study period, 564 patients aged 17-86 years (mean, 58 years) were referred to our department for CEUS liver studies (total: 644; 491 outpatient studies, 153 inpatient studies). This included 4 examinations that were ordered by the patient's physician but not performed by our staff. The majority of the CEUS examinations (n = 583; 90.5%) were regularly scheduled procedures ordered by clinical specialists from our center (77.3%) or other centers (11.8%); by general practitioners (on their own initiative) (0.8%); or by other figures (0.6%). The remaining 61 examinations (9.5%) were unscheduled procedures done on the initiative of a radiologist following conventional sonography (US). Fewer than half (47.8%) of the examinations were requested as first-line assessments. The others were ordered to clarify inconclusive findings generated by conventional US (30%) or by a more sophisticated imaging study (CT, MRI, PET) (16.1%) or to resolve discrepancies between CT, MRI, and/or PET findings (6%). CEUS is a relatively noninvasive, low-cost imaging study that is simple to perform and requires no particular patient preparation. This may explain its increasing use to clarify doubts raised by conventional US and other more sophisticated imaging studies.

Can contrast-enhanced ultrasound evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the assessment of acute pancreatitis (AP), as well as its diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of the severity of pancreatitis.

METHODS

A prospective double-blind study was carried out in 33 AP patients from May 2007 to January 2008. Each patient underwent both CEUS and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) with the time interval between two examinations less than 72 h. Using CECT as gold standard, the ability of CEUS to diagnose pancreatic necrosis as well as peripancreatic effusion and/or complications, and its diagnostic value in the evaluation of the severity of pancreatitis, were investigated. Balthazar's grading system was used to measure CT and ultrasound severity indices (CTSI and USSI), and the correlation between CTSI and USSI was tested by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

A strong correlation between CTSI and USSI was found (r = 0.92, P < 0.01).The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value of CEUS in the diagnosis of pancreatic parenchyma necrosis were 90, 95, 94, 90 and 95%, in the diagnosis of peripancreatic effusion and/or complications were 83, 100, 93, 100 and 91%, and in the diagnosis of severe pancreatitis were 97, 67, 94, 97 and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS has shown to be of clinical value in the assessment of pancreatic necrosis as well as peripancreatic complications in AP and has a high diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of the severity of pancreatitis. Further studies are needed to add it to the diagnostic algorithm for acute pancreatitis.

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of resected and immunohistochemically proven hepatic angiomyolipomas

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in patients with hepatic angiomyolipomas with respect to contrast-enhancing kinetics and enhancement patterns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nonlinear, low mechanical index (mechanical index less than 0.2), real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was performed in 18 patients with 19 tumors after 2.4 mL bolus injection of contrast agent SonoVue. All the 19 tumors were surgically resected and immunohistochemically proven sporadic hepatic angiomyolipomas.

RESULTS

Inhomogeneous hyperenhancing pattern was detected 16 tumors (84.2%) and homogeneous hyperenhancing pattern in 1 tumor (0.5%) in arterial phase and portal phase, 16 lesions remained hyperenhancement but one lesion became isoenhancement in late phase. Two lesions (10.5%) were detected inhomogeneously hypoenhancement compared to liver parenchyma during arterial, portal, and late phases, with only punctiform internal enhancement. The margin of all the lesions were smooth and well defined on contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, whereas no peripheral nodular arterial enhancement, centripetal filling, or spoke-wheel like enhancement pattern were depicted. Early strong enhancement in arterial phase, rapid washout of contrast agent, and appear hypoechoic to surrounding liver tissue during portal or late phase was not at all observed.

CONCLUSION

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography can demonstrate typical imaging characteristics of hepatic angiomyolipomas in most cases, that is, inhomogeneous hyperenhancing pattern in arterial phase, prolonged hyperenhancement during portal and late phase with smooth and well-defined margin. This real-time dynamic imaging technique may therefore improve noninvasive characterization and differentiation of this rare, benign, hepatic mesenchymal neoplasm.

Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosing of focal spleen lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the features of focal spleen lesions (FSLs) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CEUS with a blot injection of SonoVue was performed in 48 patients with 75 FSLs (median diameter 2.6cm) and their perfusion characteristics were analyzed by using contrast pulse sequences (CPS) technique.

RESULTS

Among 19 malignant lesions (10 metastases, 7 lymphoma, 1 hemangiosarcoma, 1 epithelioid hemangioendothelioma) and 56 benign lesion (23 hemangiomas, 14 cysts, 8 infarctions, 4 splenic ruptures, 3 tuberculosis, 2 abscess, 1 pseudoaneurysm, 1 lymphangioma), 25 benign lesions were demonstrated nonenhancement. For malignancy, 50.0% (5/10) metastases and 57.1% (4/7) lymphomas were showed hypoenhancement in the arterial phase, and 18 (94.7%) of malignant lesions were hypo-enhancement in the parenchymal phase. Among 31 benign lesions with enhancement, 27 (87.1%) were showed isoenhancement or hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and 22 (71.0%) lesions were isoenhancement or hyperenhancement in the parenchymal phase. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of diagnosis for FSLs were 91.1%, 95.0% and 92.0% for CEUS and 75.0%, 84.2% and 77.3% respectively, for the conventional baseline ultrasound (BUS).

CONCLUSION

Real-time CEUS can provide valuable information for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of FSLs.

[Radiological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in 2010]

The aim of diagnosis imaging is to detect hepatocellular carcinoma at an early stage, when a curative treatment is available. Biopsy is no longer required prior to treatment, and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is heavily dependent of imaging characteristics. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to describe the typical features of small (<20mm) and larger hepatocellular carcinomas with noninvasive diagnostic criteria, including ultrasound, computed tomography and MRI. Advances in these imaging modalities have greatly improved the detection of small hepatic nodules on liver cirrhosis, including the different steps of carcinogenesis, from regenerative to dysplastic nodules, and we emphasize the difficulties of radiological differentiation of precancerous lesions and small hepatocellular carcinomas.

Liver contrast enhanced ultrasound perfusion imaging in the evaluation of chronic hepatitis C fibrosis: preliminary results

We wanted to determine whether liver contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-derived peak signal intensity (PSI) and peak signal intensity/time (PIT) predict liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Forty-nine patients with CHC (METAVIR classification) and 10 control subjects were included in the study. After a bolus of 2.4 mL SonoVue (Bracco Imaging, Milan, Italy) solution was injected into a peripheral vein, the right lobe of the liver containing the right portal vein was scanned in a transverse section. Two-dimensional sonography was performed using the Philips iU22 ultrasound system (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). A 1.0-5.0-MHz (C5-1) wideband convex transducer was used, applying the following settings in all cases. Regions of interest were manually drawn over the right liver lobe and over the portal vein (PV). Liver parenchyma PSI (LPpsi) and PIT (LPpit), portal vein PSI (PVpsi) and PIT (PVpit) were automatically calculated. δPSI was defined as the difference between PVpsi and LPpsi. A significant correlation was observed between PA(PSI) and fibrosis scores. When patients were stratified according to their LPpsi, a significant difference was achieved only between patients with fibrosis score 0-1 vs. 2-3 and 2 vs. 4. Statistically significant differences between all fibrosis scores, except 0 vs. 1 and 3 vs. 4 were observed when δPSI was used to stratify patients. Overall diagnostic accuracy of LPpsi and δPSI measurement for severe fibrosis by area under the receiving operator characteristic curve analysis was, respectively, 0.87 and 0.88. We suggest that liver CEUS perfusion could have the potential to be used as a complementary tool for the evaluation of liver fibrosis. However, further large-scale studies are required to accurately assess its accuracy in the evaluation of liver fibrosis.

Parametric imaging for characterizing focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound

The differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions plays an important role in diagnosis of liver disease and therapeutic planning of local or general disease. This differentiation, based on characterization, relies on the observation of the dynamic vascular patterns (DVP) of lesions with respect to adjacent parenchyma, and may be assessed during contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging after a bolus injection. For instance, hemangiomas (i.e., benign lesions) exhibit hyper-enhanced signatures over time, whereas metastases (i.e., malignant lesions) frequently present hyperenhanced foci during the arterial phase and always become hypo-enhanced afterwards. The objective of this work was to develop a new parametric imaging technique, aimed at mapping the DVP signatures into a single image called a DVP parametric image, conceived as a diagnostic aid tool for characterizing lesion types. The methodology consisted in processing a time sequence of images (DICOM video data) using four consecutive steps: (1) pre-processing combining image motion correction and linearization to derive an echo-power signal, in each pixel, proportional to local contrast agent concentration over time; (2) signal modeling, by means of a curve-fitting optimization, to compute a difference signal in each pixel, as the subtraction of adjacent parenchyma kinetic from the echopower signal; (3) classification of difference signals; and (4) parametric image rendering to represent classified pixels as a support for diagnosis. DVP parametric imaging was the object of a clinical assessment on a total of 146 lesions, imaged using different medical ultrasound systems. The resulting sensitivity and specificity were 97% and 91%, respectively, which compare favorably with scores of 81 to 95% and 80 to 95% reported in medical literature for sensitivity and specificity, respectively.

Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role?

Contrast agents for ultrasonography (US) comprise microscopic bubbles of gas in an encapsulating shell. They are unique in that they interact with the imaging process, oscillating in response to a low-intensity ultrasound field and disrupting in response to a high-intensity field. New contrast-specific imaging modes allow US to show exquisite vascularity and tissue perfusion in real time and with excellent spatial resolution. In Europe, Asia, and Canada, to name only the most obvious, characterization of focal liver masses is the first and best established use of contrast-enhanced (CE) US, allowing for the noninvasive diagnosis of commonly encountered liver masses with comparable accuracy to that of computed tomography and magnetic resonance studies. CE US is a preferred modality for the difficult task of diagnosis of liver nodules detected on surveillance scans in those at risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Newer body applications include the guidance of ablative intervention, monitoring activity of bowel inflammation in Crohn disease, characterization of kidney masses, especially cystic renal cell carcinoma, diagnosis of prostate cancer, and monitoring the response of tumors to antivascular drug therapies. Microbubble contrast agents are easy to use and robust; their use poses no risk of nephrotoxicity and requires no ionizing radiation. CE US plays a vital and expanding role that improves management and patient care.

Contrast-enhanced 3D ultrasonography in minute hepatocellular carcinoma

PURPOSE

The study aimed to clarify whether contrast-enhanced (CE) three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography (US) can depict characteristic hyperstain and washout patterns in minute nodules ≤10 mm of hepatocellular carcinoma (minute HCC), and whether it serves as a potent diagnostic modality.

METHODS

CE 3D US was carried out to depict hyperstain and washout of a solitary nodule ≤10 mm in patients with liver cirrhosis. When both patterns were depicted with success, CE computed tomography (CT) and CE magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were also carried out as part of a comparative study, and then a histological specimen was obtained by needle biopsy. The final diagnosis was based on the histopathological findings and a follow-up on the growth of nodules.

RESULTS

All 12 minute nodules exhibiting hyperstain and washout showed evidence of HCC when examined by CE 3D US. The CE CT and CE MRI examinations could depict both of these patterns, characteristic of HCC, in most of the nodules but rather less successfully than CE 3D US.

CONCLUSION

CE 3D US can depict hyperstain and washout patterns in minute HCC and serves as a potent modality for diagnosis.

The assessment of microvascular flow and tissue perfusion using ultrasound imaging

Imaging microvascular flow is of diagnostic value for a wide range of diseases including cancer, inflammation, and cardiovascular disease. The introduction of microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents offers significant signal enhancement to the otherwise weakly scattered signal from blood in the circulation. Microbubbles provide maximum impedance mismatch, but are not linear scatterers. Their complex response to ultrasound has generated research on both their behaviour and their scattered-signal processing. Nearly 20 years ago signal processing started with simple spectral filtering of harmonics showing contrast-enhanced images. More recent pulse encoding techniques have achieved good cancellation of tissue echoes. The good quality contrast-only images enabled ultrasound contrast-imaging applications to be established in microvascular measurements in the liver and the myocardium. The field promises to advance the quantification of microvascular flow kinetics.