Frequency of Serum Creatinine Changes in the Absence of Iodinated Contrast Material: Implications for Studies of Contrast Nephrotoxicity

Acute and long-term renal effects after iodine contrast media-enhanced computerised tomography in the critically ill-a retrospective bi-centre cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine if current clinical use of iodine contrast media (ICM) for computerised tomography (CT) increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and long-term decline in renal function in patients treated in intensive care.

METHODS

A retrospective bi-centre cohort study was performed with critically ill subjects undergoing either ICM-enhanced or unenhanced CT. AKI was defined and staged based on the Kidney Disease Improve Global Outcome AKI criteria, using both creatinine and urine output criteria. Follow-up plasma creatinine was recorded three to six months after CT to assess any long-term effects of ICM on renal function.

RESULTS

In total, 611 patients were included in the final analysis, median age was 65.0 years (48.0-73.0, quartile 1-quartile 3 (IQR)) and 62.5% were male. Renal replacement therapy was used post-CT in 12.9% and 180-day mortality was 31.2%. Plasma creatinine level on day of CT was 100.0 µmol/L (66.0-166.5, IQR) for non-ICM group and 77.0 µmol/L (59.0-109.0, IQR) for the ICM group. The adjusted odds ratio for developing AKI if the patient received ICM was 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.64-1.66, p = 0.90). No significant association between ICM and increase in plasma creatinine at long-term follow-up was found, with an adjusted effect size of 2.92 (95% confidence interval - 6.52-12.36, p = 0.543).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study do not indicate an increased risk of AKI or long-term decline in renal function when ICM is used for enhanced CT in patients treated at intensive care units.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Patients treated in intensive care units had no increased risk of acute kidney injury or persistent decline in renal function after contrast-enhanced CT. This information underlines the need for a proper risk-reward assessment before denying patients a contrast-enhanced CT.

KEY POINTS

• Iodine contrast media is considered a risk factor for the development of acute kidney injury. • Patients receiving iodine contrast media did not have an increased incidence of acute kidney injury or persistent decline in renal function. • A more clearly defined risk of iodine contrast media helps guide clinical decisions whether to perform contrast-enhanced CTs or not.

A prospective, multicenter, three-cohort study evaluating contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) in patients with cirrhosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Nephrotoxicity of intravenous iodinated contrast media (ICM) in cirrhosis is still a debated issue, due to scarce, low-quality and conflicting evidence. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and predisposing factors of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with cirrhosis undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

METHODS

We performed a prospective, multicenter, cohort study including 444 inpatients, 148 with cirrhosis (cohort 1) and 163 without cirrhosis (cohort 3) undergoing CECT and 133 with cirrhosis (cohort 2) unexposed to ICM. Kidney function parameters were assessed at T0, 48-72 h (T1), 5 and 7 days after CECT/enrollment. Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (U-NGAL) was measured in 50 consecutive patients from cohort 1 and 50 from cohort 2 as an early biomarker of tubular damage.

RESULTS

AKI incidence was not significantly increased in patients with cirrhosis undergoing CECT (4.8%, 1.5%, 2.5% in cohorts 1, 2, 3 respectively, p = n.s.). Most AKI cases were mild and transient. The presence of concomitant infections was the only independent predictive factor of contrast-induced AKI (odds ratio 22.18; 95% CI 2.87-171.22; p = 0.003). No significant modifications of U-NGAL between T0 and T1 were detected, neither in cohort 1 nor in cohort 2 (median ΔU-NGAL: +0.2 [-7.6 to +5.5] ng/ml, +0.0 [-6.8 to +9.5] ng/ml, respectively [p = 0.682]).

CONCLUSIONS

AKI risk after CECT in cirrhosis is low and not significantly different from that of the general population or of the cirrhotic population unexposed to ICM. It mostly consists of mild and rapidly resolving episodes of renal dysfunction and it is not associated with tubular kidney injury. Patients with ongoing infections appear to be the only ones at higher risk of AKI.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Nephrotoxicity due to intravenous iodinated contrast media (ICM) in patients with cirrhosis is still a debated issue, as the available evidence is limited and based on very heterogeneous studies, often conducted on small and retrospective cohorts. In this prospective three-cohort study we found that intravenous administration of ICM was associated with a low risk of AKI, similar to that of the general population and to that of patients with cirrhosis unexposed to ICM. Patients with ongoing infections were the only ones to have a significantly increased risk of contrast-induced AKI. Therefore, the actual recommendations of performing contrast imaging studies cautiously in cirrhosis do not seem to be reasonable anymore, with the exception of infected patients, who have a significantly higher risk of contrast-induced AKI.

Renal safety and survival among acutely ill hospitalized patients treated by blockers of the Renin-Angiotensin axis or loop diuretics: a single-center retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Concern exists regarding the renal safety of blocking the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) during acute illness, especially in the presence of volume depletion and hemodynamic instability.

METHODS

We explored the impact of loop diuretics and RAS blockers on the likelihood of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) or acute kidney functional recovery (AKR) among inpatients. Adjusted odds ratio for AKI, AKR and mortality was calculated, using logistic regression models, with subgroup analysis for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, corrected for blood pressure measurements.

RESULTS

53,289 patients were included. RAS blockade was associated with reduced adjusted odds ratio for both AKI (0.76, CI 0.70-0.83) AKR (0.55, 0.52-0.58), and mortality within 30 days (0.44, 0.41-0.48), whereas loop diuretics were associated with increased risk of AKI (3.75, 3.42-4.12) and mortality (1.71, 1.58-1.85) and reduced AKR (0.71, 0.66-0.75). Comparable impact of RAS blockers and loop diuretics on renal outcomes and death was found among 6,069 patients with eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2. RAS inhibition and diuretics tended to increase the adjusted odds ratios for AKI and to reduce the likelihood of AKR in hypotensive patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduced blood pressure, RAS blockers and diuretics affect the odds of developing AKI or AKR among inpatients, suggesting possible disruption in renal functional reserve (RFR). As long as blood pressure is maintained, RAS inhibition seems to be safe and renoprotective in this population, irrespective of kidney function upon admission, and is associated with reduced mortality.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following IV Iodinated Contrast Media Exposure: 2023 Update, From the AJR Special Series on Contrast Media

Iodinated contrast material (ICM) has revolutionized the field of diagnostic radiology through improvements in diagnostic performance and expansion in clinical indications for radiographic and CT examinations. Historically, nephrotoxicity was a feared complication of ICM use, thought to be associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Such fears often precluded use of ICM in imaging evaluations, commonly at the expense of diagnostic performance and timely diagnosis. Over the past 20 years, the nephrotoxic risk of ICM has become a topic of debate, as more recent evidence from higher-quality studies now suggest that many cases of what was considered contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) were likely cases of mistaken causal attribution; most of these cases represented either acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by any of myriad other known factors that can adversely affect renal function and were coincidentally present at the time of contrast media exposure (contrast-associated AKI (CA-AKI)) or a manifestation of the normal variation in renal function that increases with worsening renal function. This review discusses the current state of knowledge on CI-AKI and CA-AKI including the incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and prophylactic strategies in the identification and management of these clinical conditions.

Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury: Definitions, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Implications

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common occurrence after contrast media administration. Hemodynamic changes, direct tubular injury, and reactive oxygen species are the proposed mechanisms involved in AKI. However, in most scenarios, it is not possible to establish causality despite extensive clinical evaluation, therefore, contrast-associated AKI (CA-AKI) has become a widely accepted term to define AKI postcontrast. CA-AKI is associated with worse clinical outcomes including cardiovascular events and mortality; however, discussions are ongoing whether CA-AKI is a marker of an increased risk of adverse outcomes or a mediator of such outcomes.

Intravenous versus oral hydration to reduce the risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury after intravenous contrast-enhanced CT in patients with severe chronic kidney disease (ENRICH): a study protocol for a single-centre, parallel-group, open-labelled non-inferiority randomised controlled trial in Denmark

INTRODUCTION

Contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) is widely used for diagnostic purposes. The use of contrast medium carries a risk for postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI), especially in patients with AKI or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Current guidelines recommend prophylactic intravenous hydration to prevent PC-AKI in high-risk patients. Oral hydration is non-inferior to intravenous hydration in patients with moderate CKD, but it has not been evaluated in high-risk patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The ENRICH trial will enrol 254 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤30 mL/min/1.73 m2 undergoing intravenous CECT, who are block randomised (2-4-2) with stratification for CKD stage, diabetes status, and indication for referral to prophylactic treatment with oral or intravenous hydration. PC-AKI is defined as an absolute increase in SCr of >0.3 mg/dL or >1.5 from baseline at 2-5 days. Renal function will also be evaluated <90 days, <7 days and 1-3 days before intravenous CECT, and 25-40 days after intravenous CECT. Secondary outcomes include dialysis, renal adverse events, hospitalisation due to hydration-related or contrast-related sequelae, and all-cause mortality ≤30 days postcontrast. Pre- and postcontrast plasma and urinary biomarkers will be evaluated for diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of the primary and secondary outcomes.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Oral hydration is patient-friendly and less costly compared with intravenous hydration. If oral hydration is non-inferior to intravenous hydration in high-risk patients, it could be implemented as new hydration strategy, which will facilitate the clinical diagnosing of elective patients with severe CKD without unnecessary resource utilisation. The protocol is approved by the Regional Scientific Ethical Committee for Southern Denmark (S-20210126), and the Data Protection Agency (21/66779). The study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Positive as well as negative findings will be reported in international peer-reviewed journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05283512.

Electronic alert outpatient protocol improves the quality of care for the risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury following computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Prevention and diagnosis of postcontrast acute kidney injury (AKI) after contrast-enhanced computed tomography is burdensome in outpatient department. We investigated whether an electronic alert system could improve prevention and diagnosis of postcontrast AKI.

METHODS

In March 2018, we launched an electronic alert system that automatically identifies patients with a baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, provides a prescription of fluid regimen, and recommends a follow-up for serum creatinine measurement. Participants prescribed contrast-enhanced computed tomography at outpatient department before and after the launch of the system were categorized as historical and alert group, respectively. Propensity for the surveillance of postcontrast AKI was compared using logistic regression. Risks of AKI, admission, mortality, and renal replacement therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

The historical and alert groups included 289 and 309 participants, respectively. The alert group was more likely to be men and take diuretics. The most frequent volume of prophylactic fluid in historical and alert group was 1,000 and 750 mL, respectively. Follow-up for AKI was more common in the alert group (adjusted odds ratio, 6.00; p < 0.001). Among them, incidence of postcontrast AKI was not statistically different. The two groups did not differ in risks of admission, mortality, or renal replacement therapy.

CONCLUSION

The electronic alert system could assist in the detection of high-risk patients, prevention with reduced fluid volume, and proper diagnosis of postcontrast AKI, while limiting the prescribing clinicians' burden. Whether the system can improve long-term outcomes remains unclear.

An Analysis of the Prevalence and Risk Factors of Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer

The occurrence of contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) is influenced by both patient-related and contrast-related factors. More specifically, CA-AKI has been linked to renal dysfunction, diabetes mellitus (DM), and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). We hypothesized that the prevalence of CA-AKI was high in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) because they frequently have several ASCVD risk factors and additional comorbid conditions (including ASCVD). We retrospectively examined the medical records of 208 type 2 diabetic patients who were hospitalized for DFU. These patients were divided into two groups: group 1 included 107 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomographic angiography (CTA); group 2 (control group) included 101 patients who did not receive contrast media. Following CTA, 13 (12.1%) patients developed CA-AKI in group 1, while 3 (3.0%) patients in group 2 had serum creatinine elevations consistent with AKI (P = 0.013). The following risk factors for CA-AKI were identified: longer history of DM, higher baseline serum creatinine, congestive heart failure, Wagner stage 4 and 5 DFUs, peripheral artery disease, older age, and lower hemoglobin values. CA-AKI is a common complication after CTA in patients with DFU. To reduce the risk of CA-AKI in these patients, associated risk factors and preventive measures should be considered.

A novel pre-operative risk assessment tool to identify patients at risk of contrast associated acute kidney injury after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is associated with mortality and morbidity. Risk stratification remains a vital component of preoperative evaluation. We sought to generate and validate a pre-procedure CA-AKI risk stratification tool for elective EVAR patients.

METHODS

We queried the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) database for elective EVAR patients and excluded those on dialysis, with a history of renal transplant, death during procedure, and without creatinine measures. Association with CA-AKI (rise in creatinine > 0.5 mg/dL) was tested using mixed effects logistic regression. Variables associated with CA-AKI were used to generate a predictive model via a single classification tree. The variables selected by the classification tree were then validated by fitting a mixed effects logistic regression model into the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) dataset.

RESULTS

Our derivation cohort included 7,043 patients, 3.5% of whom developed CA-AKI. After multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.021, 95% CI 1.004-1.040), female sex (OR 1.393, CI 1.012-1.916), GFR < 30 ml/min (OR 5.068, CI 3.255-7.891), current smoking (OR 1.942, CI 1.067-3.535), COPD (OR 1.402, CI 1.066-1.843), maximum AAA diameter (OR 1.018, CI 1.006-1.029), and presence of iliac artery aneurysm (OR 1.352, CI 1.007-1.816) were associated with increased odds of CA-AKI. Our risk prediction calculator demonstrated that patients with a GFR <30 ml/min, females, and patients with a maximum AAA diameter of > 6.9 cm are at higher risk of CA-AKI after EVAR. Using the VQI dataset (N = 62,986), we found that GFR <30 ml/min (OR 4.668, CI 4.007-5.85), female sex (OR 1.352, CI 1.213-1.507), and maximum AAA diameter > 6.9 cm (OR 1.824, CI 1.212-1.506) were associated with increased risk of CA-AKI after EVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Herein, we present a simple and novel risk assessment tool that can be used pre-operatively to identify patients at risk of CA-AKI after EVAR. Patients with a GFR < 30 ml/min, maximum AAA diameter > 6.9 cm, and females who are undergoing EVAR may be at risk for CA-AKI after EVAR. Prospective studies are needed to determine the efficacy of our model.

What Promotes Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease-Contrast Media, Hydration Status or Something Else?

Multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) is found in approximately 50% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although we have data showing the benefits of revascularization of significant non-culprit coronary lesions in patients with AMI, the optimal timing of angioplasty remains unclear. The most common reason for postponing subsequent percutaneous treatment is the fear of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with AMI undergoing PCI, and its etiology appears to be complex and incompletely understood. In this review, we discuss the definition, pathophysiology and risk factors of AKI in patients with AMI undergoing PCI. We present the impact of AKI on the course of hospitalization and distant prognosis of patients with AMI. Special attention was paid to the phenomenon of AKI in patients undergoing multivessel revascularization. We analyze the correlation between increased exposure to contrast medium (CM) and the risk of AKI in patients with AMI to provide information useful in the decision-making process about the optimal timing of revascularization of non-culprit lesions. In addition, we present diagnostic tools in the form of new biomarkers of AKI and discuss ways to prevent and mitigate the course of AKI.

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury and its contemporary prevention

The complexity and application range of interventional and diagnostic procedures using contrast media (CM) have recently increased. This allows more patients to undergo procedures that involve CM administration. However, the intrinsic CM toxicity leads to the risk of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). At present, effective therapy of CI-AKI is rather limited. Effective prevention of CI-AKI therefore becomes crucially important. This review presents an in-depth discussion of CI-AKI incidence, pathogenesis, risk prediction, current preventive strategies, and novel treatment possibilities. The review also discusses the difference between CI-AKI incidence following intraarterial and intravenous CM administration. Factors contributing to the development of CI-AKI are considered in conjunction with the mechanism of acute kidney damage. The need for ultimate risk estimation and the prediction of CI-AKI is stressed. Possibilities of CI-AKI prevention is evaluated within the spectrum of existing preventive measures aimed at reducing kidney injury. In particular, the review discusses intravenous hydration regimes and pre-treatment with statins and N-acetylcysteine. The review further focuses on emerging alternative imaging technologies, alternative intravascular diagnostic and interventional procedures, and new methods for intravenous hydration guidance; it discusses the applicability of those techniques in complex procedures and their feasibility in current practise. We put emphasis on contemporary interventional cardiology imaging methods, with a brief discussion of CI-AKI in non-vascular and non-cardiologic imaging and interventional studies.

Risk of Acute Kidney Injury Following Contrast-enhanced CT in a Cohort of 10 407 Children and Adolescents

Background Previous studies have challenged the concept of contrast material-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) in adults; however, limited data exist for children and adolescents. Purpose To calculate the incidence and determine the risks of AKI in patients who received intravenous iodinated contrast media for CT. Materials and Methods This retrospective study was performed at a children's hospital from January 2008 to January 2018 and included patients aged 0-17 years in whom serum creatinine levels were measured within 48 hours before and after CT with or without contrast media. The incidence of AKI was measured according to the AKI Network guidelines. A subgroup analysis with propensity score matching of cases with control patients was performed. Differences before and after stratification based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were explored. Adjusted risk models were developed using log-binomial generalized estimating equations to estimate relative risk (RR). Results From a total of 54 000 CT scans, 19 377 scans from 10 407 patients (median age, 8.5 years; IQR, 3-14; 5869 boys, 4538 girls) were included in the analysis. Incidence rate of AKI for the entire sample was 1.5%; it was 1.4% (123 of 8844) in the group that underwent contrast-enhanced CT and 1.6% (171 of 10 533) in the group that did not (P = .18). In the contrast-enhanced CT group, AKI incidence was higher in the group with eGFR of at least 60 mL/min/1.73 m² and in the group with eGFR lower than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² (1.3% and 8.5%, respectively; P < .001) compared with the noncontrast group (0.1% and 2.7%, respectively; P < .001). Age was found to be a protective factor against AKI, with an RR of 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94, 0.99; P = .01), and contrast media increased risk in the subgroup analysis, with an RR of 2.19 (95% CI: 1.11, 4.35; P = .02). Conclusion The overall incidence of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced CT in children and adolescents was very low, and exposure to contrast media did not increase the risk consistently for acute kidney injury among different groups and analyses. © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by McDonald in this issue.

Acute kidney injury development in polytrauma and the safety of early repeated contrast studies: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The role of repeat intravenous contrast doses beyond initial contrast imaging in the development of acute kidney injury (AKI) for multiple injury patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) is not fully understood. We hypothesized that additional contrast doses are potentially modifiable risk factors for worse outcomes.

METHODS

An 8-year retrospective study of our institutional prospective postinjury multiple organ failure database was performed. Adult ICU admissions that survived >72 hours with Injury Severity Score (ISS) of >15 were included. Patients were grouped based on number of repeat contrast studies received after initial imaging. Initial vital signs, resuscitation data, and laboratory parameters were collected. Primary outcome was AKI (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria), and secondary outcomes included contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI; >25% or >44 μmol/L increase in creatinine within 72 hours of contrast administration), multiple organ failure, length of stay, and mortality.

RESULTS

Six-hundred sixty-three multiple injury patients (age, 45.3 years [SD, 9.1 years]; males, 75%; ISS, 25 (interquartile range, 20-34); mortality, 5.4%) met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of AKI was 13.4%, and CI-AKI was 14.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed that receiving additional contrast doses within the first 72 hours was not associated with AKI (odds ratio, 1.33; confidence interval, 0.80-2.21; p = 0.273). Risk factors for AKI included higher ISS ( p < 0.0007), older age ( p = 0.0109), higher heart rate ( p = 0.0327), lower systolic blood pressure ( p = 0.0007), and deranged baseline blood results including base deficit ( p = 0.0042), creatinine ( p < 0.0001), lactate ( p < 0.0001), and hemoglobin ( p = 0.0085). Acute kidney injury was associated with worse outcomes (ICU length of stay: 8 vs. 3 days, p < 0.0001; mortality: 16% vs. 3.8%, p < 0.0001; MOF: 42% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There is a limited role of repeat contrast administration in AKI development in ICU-admitted multiple injury patients. The clinical significance of CI-AKI is likely overestimated, and it should not compromise essential secondary imaging from the ICU. Further prospective studies are needed to verify our results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/Care Management; Level III.

Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Evidence in Support of Its Existence and a Review of Its Pathogenesis and Management

The role of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) remains controversial. Many experts contend that CIN does not exist or is extremely rare. The diagnosis was previously made too frequently and inappropriately in the presence of coexisting and confounding comorbidities and risk factors making it difficult to singularly isolate the etiologic role of intravenous contrast media in acute kidney injury (AKI). It is probable that many patients were denied important diagnostic information from radiocontrast studies for fear of CIN. Recently, a new terminology for CIN was introduced, and the term CIN was replaced by two interrelated new terms: one is contrast-associated acute kidney injury (CA-AKI), and the second one is contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI). CA-AKI occurs in association with risk factors or comorbidities, therefore, it is a correlative diagnosis. On the other hand, CI-AKI is a subtype of CA-AKI that results directly from iodinated contrast media. In this review, we present evidence from various studies that argue against CI-AKI and also those that suggest its existence but with much lower frequency. We will also provide the current status of the pathophysiology and management of CA-AKI/CI-AKI.

Safety considerations related to intravenous contrast agents in pediatric imaging

Intravenous contrast media are used in MRI, CT and US studies for anatomical evaluation and lesion characterization. Safety is always of paramount importance when administering any contrast media to children, and it is important for radiologists and ordering providers to be knowledgeable of the safety profiles and potential adverse events that can occur. This manuscript reviews the frequency and types of adverse events associated with intravenous contrast agents reported in the pediatric literature. Overall, intravenous contrast agents are very safe to use in children. However, familiarity with how to treat and prevent these uncommon events is crucial in preventing poor outcomes. In addition, an understanding of gadolinium deposition in tissues can help facilitate conversations with concerned physicians and parents. This review provides a concise yet comprehensive reference for radiologists and ordering providers on intravenous contrast safety considerations in the pediatric patient.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on Contrast Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Iodinated contrast media (ICM) is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after ICM administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations. This revised guidance document was developed by a multidisciplinary CAR Working Group of radiologists and nephrologists, and summarizes changes in practice related to contrast administration, screening, and risk stratification since the last guideline. It reviews the scientific evidence for contrast associated AKI and provides consensus-based recommendations for its prevention and management in the Canadian healthcare context. This article is a joint publication in the Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal and Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease, intended to inform both communities of practice.

Risk of acute kidney injury after contrast-enhanced computerized tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 propensity score-matched cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Intravenous application of contrast media is part of a wide spectrum of diagnostic procedures for better imaging quality. Clinical avoidance of contrast-enhanced imaging is an ever-present quandary in patients with impaired kidney function. The objective of this study was to estimate the risk for acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis and mortality among patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT compared to propensity score-matched controls (i.e. contrast-unenhanced CT). Selected cohort studies featured high-risk patients with advanced kidney disease and critical illness.

METHODS

This review was designed to conform to the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed was searched from August 2021 to November 2021 for all-language articles without date restriction. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) was used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-one articles were included, comprising data of 169,455 patients. The overall risk of AKI was similar in the contrast-enhanced and unenhanced groups (OR: 0.97 [95% CI: 0.85; 1.11], p = 0.64), regardless of baseline renal function and underlying disease. Substantial heterogeneity was detected (I² = 90%, p ≤ 0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression identified hypertension (p = 0.03) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m² (p = 0.0001) as factors associated with greater risk of post-contrast AKI.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on propensity score-matched pairs obtained from 21 cohort studies, we found no evidence for increased risk for AKI, dialysis or mortality after contrast-enhanced CT among patients with eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m². In congruence with the emerging evidence in the literature, caution should be exercised in patients with hypertension and eGFR ≤ 30 mL/min/1.73 m².

KEY POINTS

• The application of contrast media for medical imaging is not associated with higher odds for AKI, induction of renal replacement therapy, or mortality. Many comorbidities traditionally associated with greater risk for acute kidney injury do not appear to predispose for renal decline after contrast media exposure. • Underlying hypertension and eGFR less than or equal to 30 mL/min/1.73 m² seem to predispose for post-contrast acute kidney injury. • Propensity score matching cannot account for unmeasured influences on AKI incidence, which needs to be addressed in the interpretation of results.

Canadian Association of Radiologists Guidance on Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury

Purpose

Iodinated contrast media is one of the most frequently administered pharmaceuticals. In Canada, over 5.4 million computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed in 2019, of which 50% were contrast enhanced. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurring after iodinated contrast administration was historically considered a common iatrogenic complication which was managed by screening patients, prophylactic strategies, and follow-up evaluation of renal function. The Canadian Association of Radiologists (CAR) initially published guidelines on the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy in 2007, with an update in 2012. However, new developments in the field have led to the availability of safer contrast agents and changes in clinical practice, prompting a complete revision of the earlier recommendations.

Information sources

Published literature, including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports, along with expert opinions from radiologists and nephrologists across Canada.

Methods

The leadership of the CAR formed a working group of radiologists and nephrologists with expertise in contrast administration and patient management related to contrast-associated AKI. We conducted a comprehensive review of the published literature to evaluate the evidence about contrast as a cause of AKI, and to inform evidence-based recommendations. Based on the available literature, the working group developed consensus recommendations.

Key Findings

The working group developed 21 recommendations, on screening, choice of iodinated contrast media, prophylaxis, medication considerations, and post contrast administration management. The key changes from the 2012 guidelines were (1) Simplification of screening to a simple questionnaire, and not delaying emergent examinations due to a need for creatinine measurements (2) Prophylaxis considerations only for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (3) Not recommending the routine discontinuation of any drugs to decrease risk of AKI, except metformin when eGFR is less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and (4) Not requiring routine follow up serum creatinine measurements post iodinated contrast administration.

Limitations

We did not conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment.

Implications

Given the importance of iodinated contrast media use in diagnosis and management, and the low risk of AKI after contrast use, these guidelines aim to streamline the processes around iodinated contrast use in most clinical settings. As newer evidence arises that may change or add to the recommendations provided, the working group will revise these guidelines.

Contrast associated nephropathy after intravenous administration: what is the magnitude of the problem?

Intravenous contrast media (CM) is often used in clinical practice to enhance CT scan imaging. For many years, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) was thought to be a common occurrence and to result in dire consequences. When treating patients with abnormal renal function, it is not unusual that clinicians postpone, cancel, or replace contrast-enhanced imaging with other, perhaps less informative tests. New studies however have challenged this paradigm and the true risk attributable to intravenous CM for the occurrence of CIN has become debatable. In this article, we review the latest relevant medical literature and aim to provide an evidence-based answer to questions surrounding the risk, outcomes, and potential mitigation strategies of CIN after intravenous CM administration.

Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after a computed tomography scan

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The term contrast-induced nephropathy is used to describe acute deterioration of renal function after the intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material. We aimed to estimate the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy and to analyze the evolution of different biomarkers of renal function in patients who underwent computed tomography with intravenous contrast administration after premedication with oral hydration and N-acetylcysteine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective observational study included 112 patients with chronic renal failure (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 30ml-60ml/min/1.73m²) scheduled for computed tomography with intravenous iodinated contrast material. We recorded demographic variables, dose of contrast material, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and serum hemoglobin. We measured serum creatinine and GFR after premedication and after the CT examination. We summarized variables as means, standard deviations, and percentages. We used the Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests to compare pre- and post-CT values and Pearson's r to analyze correlations.

RESULTS

Incidence acute kidney injury: 0.9%; 95%CI: 0.36-1.4. Mean difference between pre- and post-CT creatinine: 0.04; 95%CI: 0.002-0.09, p<0.004. Mean difference between pre- and post-CT GFR: -3.06; 95%CI: -4.66 to -1.47), p<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic renal failure and GFR 30ml-60ml/min/1.73m² is low. The biomarkers of renal function analyzed improve in patients who receive premedication and the minimum dose of contrast material.

Acute Chelation Therapy-Associated Changes in Urine Gadolinium, Self-reported Flare Severity, and Serum Cytokines in Gadolinium Deposition Disease

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the following in patients who have undergone magnetic resonance imaging with gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) and meet the proposed diagnostic criteria for gadolinium deposition disease (GDD): (1) the effectiveness of chelation therapy (CT) with intravenous Ca-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid in removing retained gadolinium (Gd) and factors affecting the amount removed; (2) the frequency of CT-induced Flare, that is, GDD diagnostic symptom worsening, and factors affecting Flare intensity; (3) whether, as reported in a separate cohort, GDD patients' serum cytokine levels differ significantly from those in healthy normal controls and change significantly in response to CT; and (4) whether urine Gd, Flare reaction, and serum cytokine findings in GDD patients are mimicked in non-ill patients described as having gadolinium storage condition (GSC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one GDD subjects and 3 GSC subjects underwent CT. Patients provided pre-CT and post-CT 24-hour urine samples for Gd content determination along with pre-CT and 24-hour post-CT serum samples for cytokine analysis. Patients rated potential Flare 24 hours after CT. Pre-CT and post-CT 24-hour urine Gd analyses and Luminex serum cytokine assays were performed blind to patients' GDD and GSC status and all other data except age and sex. Serum cytokine levels in a healthy normal control group of age- and sex-matched subjects drawn from Stanford influenza vaccination studies were measured once, contemporaneously with those of GDD and GSC patients, using the same Luminex assay.

RESULTS

Urine Gd amounts increased post-CT by 4 times or more after 87% of the 30 CT sessions. The most important factors appeared to be the time since the last GBCA dose and the cumulative dose received. Urine Gd amounts for GDD and GSC patients fell in the same ranges. All GDD patients, and no GSC patient, reported a Flare 24 hours post-CT. Linear regression found that Flare intensity was significantly predicted by a model including pre- and post-CT Gd amounts and the number of GBCA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Post-CT, multiple cytokines showed strong positive relationships with GDD patients' Flare intensity in multivariable models. The pre-CT serum levels of 12 cytokines were significantly different in GDD patients compared with healthy flu vaccine controls. The small number of GSC patients precluded analogous statistical testing. Post-CT, GDD patients' serum levels of 20 cytokines were significantly decreased, and 2 cytokines significantly increased. These cytokines did not exhibit the same change pattern in the 3 GSC patients. The small number of GSC patients precluded statistical comparisons of GSC to GDD patients' results.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, 24-hour urine Gd content increased markedly and similarly in GDD and GSC patients after Ca-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid CT. Post-CT Flare reaction developed only in GDD patients. The current study is the second finding significantly different serum cytokine levels in GDD patients compared with healthy normal controls. These differences and the difference between GDD and GSC patients' Flare and cytokine responses to CT suggest some inflammatory, immunologic, or other physiological differences in patients with GDD. Further research into the treatment and physiological underpinnings of GDD is warranted.

Acute Kidney Injury After Radiocontrast-Enhanced Computerized Tomography in Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Renal Failure: A Propensity-Score-Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

The overall risk of postcontrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI) after computerized tomography (CT) is negligible, likely because of the small volume of injected iodinated contrast media required. However, the safety of contrast media-enhanced CT in patients with advanced renal functional impairment, an established major risk factor for PC-AKI, is unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study using large data analysis of hospitalized patients at a single center. Adults undergoing CT or magnetic resonance imaging were included in the study and were stratified by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (≤30 or >30 mL/min/1.73 m) and by either contrast-enhanced or nonenhanced imaging. Only patients with serial determination of creatinine before and after imaging were included. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data between groups were analyzed and compared using univariate analysis, propensity score matching, and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22,319 imaging studies were included. Patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m or lower undergoing contrast-enhanced CT (n = 403) had an increased risk to develop PC-AKI than did similar patients undergoing enhanced or nonenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (n = 96) or nonenhanced CT (n = 1576) or patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT with a preprocedural eGFR higher than 30 mL/min/1.73 m (n = 9173). These findings remained robust after propensity matching for demographic, procedural, and clinical parameters. Multivariate regression analysis of all patients undergoing CT with preimaging eGFR of 30 mL/min or lower (n = 1979) revealed that iodine-based contrast enhancement increased the likelihood of post-CT AKI by 51% (confidence interval, 1.23-2.05).

CONCLUSION

Although radiocontrast-enhanced CT is considered safe in most hospitalized patients and in ambulatory settings, the risk of PC-AKI remains significant among inpatients with substantial preimaging renal functional impairment. Caution is warranted using iodine-based enhanced CT in hospitalized patients with an eGFR of 30 mL/min/1.73 m or lower.

Can sodium fluorescein cause contrast-induced nephropathy?

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a common cause of acute kidney injury (AKI), and can be diagnosed when the etiology of AKI is unclear other than via a contrast agent. Fluorescent angiography (FAG) with fluorescein sodium dye is generally considered to be safe for patients with kidney diseases. However, it remains unresolved whether or not FAG can induce CIN.

METHODS

Patients from two tertiary hospitals who underwent FAG and had serum creatinine results within 4 weeks before FAG and 3 days after FAG between 2001 and 2017 were retrieved. Cases with concurrent iodinated contrast imaging or undergoing dialysis were excluded from the analysis. CIN was defined by two criteria: CIN criteria as >0.5 mg/dL or >25% increase in serum creatinine (sCr) level within 3 days after FAG, and contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) criteria as ≥0.3 mg/dL increase within 2 days or ≥50% increase within 7 days after FAG.

RESULTS

A total of 979 patients were screened, and we found 124 patients with AKI after FAG. After excluding 32 patients with clear causes of AKI other than FAG, the incidence rates of CIN were 7.3% by CIN criteria and 6.4% by CIAKI criteria. CIN incidence had a U-shaped distribution according to chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages in CIN criteria, while linear association between CIN incidence and CKD stages were found in CIAKI criteria. Kaplan-Meier curves showed the CIN group was significantly associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) progression (log-rank P < 0.001, in both CIN criteria and CIAKI criteria), and adjusted hazard ratios by multivariable Cox regression were 2.23 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.468-3.378] in CIN criteria and 2.17 (95% CI 1.462-3.232) in CIAKI criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

According to CIN and CIAKI criteria, FAG may cause CIN and appeared to be a possible risk factor for ESRD progression. However, CIN or CIAKI criteria themselves may overestimate AKI and require meticulous attention to the interpretation of results.

Biochemical Markers in the Prediction of Contrast-induced Acute Kidney Injury

For many years clinicians have been searching for "kidney troponin"- a simple diagnostic tool to assess the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Recently, the rise in the variety of contrast-related procedures (contrast computed tomography (CT), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and angiography) has resulted in the increased number of contrast-induced acute kidney injuries (CI-AKI). CIAKI remains an important cause of overall mortality, prolonged hospitalisation and it increases the total costs of therapy. The consequences of kidney dysfunction affect the quality of life and they may lead to disability as well. Despite extensive worldwide research, there are no sensitive and reliable methods of CI-AKI prediction. Kidney Injury Molecule 1 (KIM-1) and Neutrophil Gelatinase Lipocalin (NGAL) have been considered as kidney-specific molecules. High concentrations of these substances before the implementation of contrast-related procedures have been suggested to enable the estimation of kidney vulnerability to CI-AKI and they seem to have the predictive potential for cardiovascular events and overall mortality. According to other authors, routine determination of known inflammation factors (e.g., CRP, WBC, and neutrophil count) may be helpful in the prediction of CIAKI. However, the results of clinical trials provide contrasting results. The pathomechanism of contrast- induced nephropathy remains unclear. Due to its prevalence, the evaluation of the risk of acute kidney injury remains a serious problem to be solved. This paper reviews pathophysiology and suggested optimal markers facilitating the prediction of contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

Ischemic Nephropathy Following Occlusion of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Graft: A Case Report

In this report, we present a case of a 55-year-old female with a past medical history of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) graft, femoral-femoral bypass graft, questionable history of chronic kidney disease (CKD), abdominal hernia repair, alcoholic pancreatitis, chronic abdominal pain on opioids, and tobacco abuse who presented with acute on chronic abdominal pain with an unexplained rise of creatinine and anuria. The patient was found to have complete occlusion of AAA graft and was determined to have ischemic nephropathy (IN).

Predictive value of preprocedural albuminuria for contrast-induced nephropathy non-recovery in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Objective

The present study investigated the predictive value of albuminuria for contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) non-recovery in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 550 consecutive patients inflicted with CIN after PCI and reassessing kidney function among 1 week–12 months between January 2012 and December 2018. Patients were stratified into three groups according to urine albumin: negative group (urine dipstick negative), trace group (urine dipstick trace) and positive group (urine dipstick ≥ 1 +). The primary outcomes were CIN non-recovery (a decrease of serum creatinine which remains ≥ 25% or 0.5 mg/dL over baseline at 1 week–12 months after PCI in patients inflicted with CIN). The odds ratio (OR) of CIN non-recovery was analyzed by logistic regression using the negative urine dipstick group as the reference group.

Results

Overall, 88 (16.0%) patients had trace urinary albumin, 74 (13.5%) patients had positive urinary albumin and 40 (7.3%) patients developed CIN non-recovery. Patients with positive urinary albumin had significantly higher incidence of CIN non-recovery [negative (3.4%), trace (11.4%) and positive (23.0%), respectively; P < 0.0001]. Multivariate analysis showed that trace and positive urinary albumin were associated with an increased risk of CIN non-recovery (trace vs negative: OR 2.88, P = 0.022; positive vs negative: OR 2.99, P = 0.021). These associations were consistent in subgroups of patients stratified by CIN non-recovery risk predictors. And CIN non-recovery was associated with an increased risk of long-term mortality during a mean follow-up period of 703 days (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Preprocedural albuminuria was associated with CIN non-recovery in patients undergoing PCI.

Renal Functional Recovery Confounding the Assessment of Contrast Nephropathy: Propensity Score Analysis

BACKGROUND

Large data analyses confirm the relative safety of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), except for those with advanced renal failure. However, the prevalence of post-contrast acute kidney injury may be masked by acute kidney functional recovery (AKR) in unstable inpatients, irrespective of contrast-enhanced imaging.

METHODS

In this work we aimed to assess AKI and AKR along with need for dialysis and mortality, among inpatients undergoing contrast-enhanced or non-enhanced CT. We performed a large-scale retrospective data analysis using propensity score matching (PSM) that compared patients undergoing contrast-enhanced and non-enhanced imaging. We also performed a subgroup analysis of subjects stratified by baseline renal function.

RESULTS

A total of 41,456 patients were analyzed. PSM resulted in well-balanced groups. AKR occurred substantially more often than AKI among hospitalized patients following CT imaging, especially among those with low baseline renal function. Yet, in this population, whereas the rate of AKI significantly increased, the rate of AKR significantly decreased following contrast-enhanced studies as compared to patients that underwent non-enhanced CT. A significantly higher proportion of patients with baseline advanced renal failure that underwent contrast-enhanced imaging required dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The increased incidence of AKI and AKR as seen in patients with lower pre-imaging kidney function possibly suggests that both entities reflect impaired renal functional reserve. Unstable kidney function in inpatients, as demonstrated by rates of AKR and AKI, is an important confounder which requires attention in similar observational studies on the renal effects of contrast media and of various other renal injurious events.

Intravenous contrast use and acute kidney injury: a retrospective study of 1,238 inpatients undergoing computed tomography

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of nephropathy induced by intravenous contrast in hospitalized patients undergoing computed tomography (CT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study involving 1,238 patients who underwent CT with or without intravenous administration of a contrast agent (iopromide). The primary outcome measure was acute kidney injury (AKI), as defined by the traditional criteria-an absolute or relative increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or ≥ 25% over baseline, respectively, at 2-3 days after contrast administration-and the newer, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria-an absolute or relative increase in SCr ≥ 0.3 mg/dL or ≥ 50% over baseline, respectively, at 2-7 days after contrast administration.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of AKI was 11.52% when the KDIGO criteria were applied. Univariate logistic regression demonstrated a significant association between an absolute post-CT increase in SCr ≥ 0.5 mg/dL and AKI, although that association did not retain significance in the multivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression initially found an association between an absolute post-CT increase in SCr ≥ 0.3 mg/dL and advanced age, although that association was not maintained after correction. We found no association between AKI and the risk factors evaluated.

CONCLUSION

We identified no criteria for contrast-induced nephropathy after CT; nor did we find AKI to be associated with the classical risk factors.

Preventing a nonexistent entity: the curious case of contrast and acute kidney injury

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years, doubt has been cast on the existence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury. The skepticism has stemmed from observational studies from large administrative healthcare databases. Although they correctly call that contrast-induced acute kidney injury is less common than previously thought, they cannot completely exclude selection bias.

RECENT FINDINGS

Though less common than previously thought, contrast-induced acute kidney injury still exists. The only prophylactic method that remains valid is that of isotonic volume expansion, which is still deemed beneficial in high-risk patients. N-acetylcysteine and sodium bicarbonate are ineffective and their use should be abandoned.

SUMMARY

Contrast-induced kidney injury should be defined based on clinical grounds, not merely on biochemical numbers. More research to validate a clinical definition is necessary in order to accurately re-examine its incidence.

Acute kidney injury: prevention, detection, and management. Summary of updated NICE guidance for adults receiving iodine-based contrast media

The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recently updated the guideline for Acute kidney injury: prevention, detection and management (NG148), providing new recommendations on preventing acute kidney injury (AKI) in adults receiving intravenous iodine-based contrast media. The association between intravenous iodinated contrast media and AKI is controversial, particularly with widespread use of iso-osmolar agents. Associations between contrast media administration and AKI are largely based on observational studies, with inherent heterogeneity in patient populations, definitions applied, and timing of laboratory investigations. In an attempt to mitigate risk, kidney protection has typically been employed using intravenous volume expansion and/or oral acetylcysteine. Such interventions are in widespread use, despite lacking high-quality evidence of benefit. In the non-emergency setting, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) measurements should be obtained within the preceding 3 months before offering intravenous iodine-based contrast media. In the acute setting, adults should also have their risk of AKI assessed before offering intravenous iodine-based contrast media; however, this should not delay emergency imaging. Based on the evidence available from randomised controlled trials, the NICE committee recommends that oral hydration should be encouraged in adults at increased risk of AKI and that volume expansion with intravenous V fluids should only be considered for inpatients at particularly high risk.

[Contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury-Consensus paper of the working group "Heart and Kidney" of the German Cardiac Society and the German Society of Nephrology]

This consensus paper summarizes the expert consensus and recommendations of the working group "Heart and Kidney" of the German Cardiac Society (DGK) and the German Society of Nephrology (DGfN) on contrast medium-induced acute kidney injury. Potentially nephrotoxic contrast agents containing iodine are frequently used in interventional medicine and for computer tomography diagnostics. Acute kidney injury occurs in approximately 8-17% of patients exposed to contrast media. The risk factors and underlying pathophysiology are discussed and recommendations for the prophylaxis and treatment of contrast medium-induced acute nephropathy are presented.

Post-Contrast Acute Kidney Injury and Intravenous Prophylactic Hydration: An Update

BACKGROUND

 Despite tremendous improvement in molecular properties over the last century, intravascular injection of iodinated contrast material may still have systemic and hemodynamic consequences. Patients with pre-existing renal insufficiency may be at risk for acute kidney injury, which may be associated with an increased risk of the need for dialysis and mortality in the long term. Many questions as to the physiological pathways, optimal definition, and incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury remain open. These uncertainties are reflected in the changing landscape of this field in terms of nomenclature, research, and clinical practice.

METHODS

 Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention of post-contrast acute kidney injury all recommend giving prophylaxis in the form of intravenous hydration to high-risk patients. Solid evidence for this strategy is lacking. This article gives an overview of the changing landscape of post-contrast acute kidney injury and prophylactic intravenous hydration, with the aim of supporting informed decision-making in clinical practice.

RESULTS

 Recent data have caused a shift in guideline recommendations: 90 % of patients formerly considered high-risk for contrast-induced acute kidney injury no longer qualify for prophylaxis. The remaining high-risk patients, with severe chronic kidney disease, represent a vulnerable population for whom intravenous hydration may provide some benefits but also carries risk.

CONCLUSION

 Intravenous hydration may benefit 'new' high-risk patients. However, it also confers risk. A dual approach to screening patients will help avoid this risk in clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

  · Intravenous hydration is the cornerstone for preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury. · Solid evidence is lacking; recent data caused a shift in guideline recommendations. · Intravenous hydration may benefit 'new' high-risk patients with severe chronic kidney disease; however, it also confers risk. · A dual approach to screening patients will help avoid this risk in clinical practice.

CITATION FORMAT

· Nijssen E, Rennenberg R, Nelemans P et al. Post-Contrast Acute Kidney Injury and Intravenous Prophylactic Hydration: An Update. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 151 - 159.

Iodinated contrast medium: Is there a re(n)al problem? A clinical vignette-based review

As we were taught, for decades, that iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury should be dreaded, considerable efforts were made to find out effective measures in mitigating the renal risk of iodinated contrast media. Imaging procedures were frequently either downgraded (unenhanced imaging) or deferred as clinicians felt that the renal risk pertaining to contrast administration outweighed the benefits of an enhanced imaging. However, could we have missed the point? Among the abundant literature about iodinated contrast-associated acute kidney injury, recent meaningful advances may help sort out facts from false beliefs. Hence, there is increasing evidence that the nephrotoxicity directly attributable to modern iodinated CM has been exaggerated. Failure to demonstrate a clear benefit from most of the tested prophylactic measures might be an indirect consequence. However, the toxic potential of iodinated contrast media is well established experimentally and should not be overlooked completely when making clinical decisions. We herein review these advances in disease and pathophysiologic understanding and the associated clinical crossroads through a typical case vignette in the critical care setting.

Minimal risk of contrast-induced kidney injury in a randomly selected cohort with mildly reduced GFR

OBJECTIVES

Previous large studies of contrast-induced or post-contrast acute kidney injury (CI-AKI/PC-AKI) have been observational, and mostly retrospective, often with patients undergoing non-enhanced CT as controls. This carries risk of inclusion bias that makes the true incidence of PC-AKI hard to interpret. Our aim was to determine the incidence of PC-AKI in a large, randomly selected cohort, comparing the serum creatinine (Scr) changes after contrast medium exposure with the normal intraindividual fluctuation in Scr.

METHODS

In this prospective study of 1009 participants (age 50-65 years, 48% females) in the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS), with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 50 mL/min, all received standard dose intravenous iohexol at coronary CT angiography (CCTA). Two separate pre-CCTA Scr samples and a follow-up sample 2-4 days post-CCTA were obtained. Change in Scr was statistically analyzed and stratification was used in the search of possible risk factors.

RESULTS

Median increase of Scr post-CCTA was 0-2 μmol/L. PC-AKI was observed in 12/1009 individuals (1.2%) according to the old ESUR criteria (> 25% or > 44 μmol/L Scr increase) and 2 individuals (0.2%) when using the updated ESUR criteria (≥ 50% or ≥ 27 μmol/L Scr increase). Possible risk factors (e.g., diabetes, age, eGFR, NSAID use) did not show increased risk of developing PC-AKI. The mean effect of contrast media on Scr did not exceed the intraindividual Scr fluctuation.

CONCLUSIONS

Iohexol administration to a randomly selected cohort with mildly reduced eGFR is safe, and PC-AKI is very rare, occurring in only 0.2% when applying the updated ESUR criteria.

KEY POINTS

• Iohexol administration to a randomly selected cohort, 50-65 years old with mildly reduced eGFR, is safe and PC-AKI is very rare. • Applying the updated ESUR PC-AKI criteria resulted in fewer cases, 0.2% compared to 1.2% using the old ESUR criteria in this cohort with predominantly mild reduction of renal function. • The mean effect of CM on Scr did not exceed the intraindividual background fluctuation of Scr, regardless of potential risk factors, such as diabetes or NSAID use in our cohort of 1009 individuals.

Administration of iodinated contrast: What is the risk in cancer patients?

OBJECTIVE

Despite the association between intravenous contrast and kidney injury, few studies exist in oncology. Our objective was to estimate kidney outcomes following iodinated contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in cancer patients, and to evaluate whether self-assessment questionnaires can identify kidney injury risk factors.

METHODS

This prospective observational study included 289 patients who underwent a CECT scan between March and May 2017 in a hospital setting. All patients completed the modified European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) questionnaire and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 ml/min/1.73 m² on the day of the examination. Outcomes were followed for 4 months. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

In the logistic regression analysis, the only variables statistically associated with deterioration in the eGFR were age, (odds ratio (OR) = 1.091, p = 0.003), female sex, (OR 0.22, p = 0.020) and arterial hypertension (AH), (OR = 3.57, p = 0.019). Regarding exitus, only the group with a worse eGFR was close to predictive statistical significance (OR = 2.48, p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of iodinated contrast in cancer patients was not associated with an increase in kidney outcomes. Risk factors in these patients were age, sex and AH.

Serum NGAL, KIM-1, IL-18, L-FABP: new biomarkers in the diagnostics of acute kidney injury (AKI) following invasive cardiology procedures

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the levels of selected markers in patients who underwent planned or emergency coronary angiography and to examine if they correlated with the occurrence of AKI.

METHODS

The study included 52 patients who underwent planned or emergency coronary angiography and received contrast agent. Serum levels of markers (NGAL, L-FABP, KIM-1, IL-18) were analyzed in all patients using ELISA tests, at baseline, after 24 and 72 h from angiography.

RESULTS

9.62% of patients developed CI-AKI. No significant differences were observed between markers levels in patients who developed CI-AKI and those who did not. After 24 h, serum levels of IL-18 were higher in patients with CI-AKI, however, this difference was on the verge of significance. Increase in serum NGAL, KIM-1 and IL-18 was observed after 24 h. Serum levels of biomarkers were insignificantly higher in group with CI-AKI. Significant changes in levels in time (baseline vs. 24 h vs. 72 h) were observed only for NGAL [157.9 (92.4-221.0) vs. 201.8 (156.5-299.9) vs. 118.5 (73.4-198.7); p < 0.0001]. No significant correlations were observed between the decrease in eGFR or the increase in creatinine and biomarkers level.

CONCLUSION

Obtained results do not allow for the indication of efficient AKI biomarkers. Their further validation in large studies of CI-AKI patients is required.

Impact of creatinine screening on contrast-induced nephropathy following computerized tomography for stroke

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to evaluate rates of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computerized tomography for acute stroke in the emergency department (ED) before and after the cessation of creatinine screening.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared ED patients receiving contrast-enhanced imaging for suspected acute stroke with and without protocolized creatinine screening. The primary outcome was CIN, defined as an increase in serum creatinine of 0.3 mg/dl within 48 hours or 50% above baseline within 7 days after contrast administration. Secondary outcomes consisted of CIN based on other definitions, renal impairment greater than 30 days from contrast administration, hemodialysis, and mortality. Outcomes were compared using difference of proportions and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

This study included 382 subjects, with 186 and 196 in the screening and post-screening cohorts, respectively. No significant differences were observed for CIN (7.0% vs 7.1%, difference 0.1% [95% CI -5.6-5.1%], OR 1.02 [95% CI 0.47-2.24]), renal impairment greater than 30 days post-contrast (8.4% vs 7.5%, OR 0.88 [0.38-2.07]), or mortality (index visit: 4.8% vs 2.6%, OR 0.51 [0.17-1.57], 90-day follow-up: 6.7% vs 4.0%, OR 0.58 [0.22-1.53]). No patients from either group required hemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The elimination of creatinine screening prior to obtaining contrast-enhanced computerized tomography in patients with suspected acute stroke did not adversely affect rates of CIN, hemodialysis, or mortality at a comprehensive stroke center.

INtravenous Contrast computed tomography versus native computed tomography in patients with acute Abdomen and impaired Renal functiOn (INCARO): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial - study protocol

INTRODUCTION

CT is the primary imaging option for acute abdominal pain in adults. Intravenous (IV) contrast media use improves CT quality but may cause post-contrast acute kidney injury (PC-AKI). Retrospective studies show no association between reduced baseline renal function and IV contrast CT, but, to our knowledge, no data from randomised controlled trials exist.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The INCARO (INtravenous Contrast computed tomography versus native computed tomography in patients with acute Abdomen and impaired Renal functiOn) trial is a multicentre, open-label, parallel group, superiority, individually randomised controlled trial comparing IV contrast-enhanced CT to native CT in patients requiring emergency abdominal or body CT with impaired renal function defined as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 15 to 45 mL/min/1.73 m². The primary outcome is a composite of all-cause mortality or renal replacement therapy (RRT) within 90 days from CT. Secondary outcomes are AKI measured by KDIGO (The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) criteria within 72 hours from CT, organ dysfunction defined by mSOFA (modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) criteria after 48 hours from CT, alive and hospital-free days within 90 days after CT, and time from imaging to definitive treatment. All-cause mortality, need for RRT and renal transplant in long-term follow-up are also measured. The calculated sample size is 994 patients. Patient recruitment is estimated to take 3 years.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee of Helsinki University Hospital approved the study. The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed academic journals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04196244.

Point-of-care creatinine tests to assess kidney function for outpatients requiring contrast-enhanced CT imaging: systematic reviews and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

Patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rates may be at higher risk of post-contrast acute kidney injury following contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging. Point-of-care devices allow rapid measurement of estimated glomerular filtration rates for patients referred without a recent estimated glomerular filtration rate result.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care creatinine tests for outpatients without a recent estimated glomerular filtration rate measurement who need contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging.

METHODS

Three systematic reviews of test accuracy, implementation and clinical outcomes, and economic analyses were carried out. Bibliographic databases were searched from inception to November 2018. Studies comparing the accuracy of point-of-care creatinine tests with laboratory reference tests to assess kidney function in adults in a non-emergency setting and studies reporting implementation and clinical outcomes were included. Risk of bias of diagnostic accuracy studies was assessed using a modified version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Probabilities of individuals having their estimated glomerular filtration rates correctly classified were estimated within a Bayesian framework and pooled using a fixed-effects model. A de novo probabilistic decision tree cohort model was developed to characterise the decision problem from an NHS and a Personal Social Services perspective. A range of alternative point-of-care testing approaches were considered. Scenario analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Fifty-four studies were included in the clinical reviews. Twelve studies reported diagnostic accuracy for estimated glomerular filtration rates; half were rated as being at low risk of bias, but there were applicability concerns for most. i-STAT (Abbott Point of Care, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA) and ABL (Radiometer Ltd, Crawley, UK) devices had higher probabilities of correctly classifying individuals in the same estimated glomerular filtration rate categories as the reference laboratory test than StatSensor® devices (Nova Biomedical, Runcorn, UK). There was limited evidence for epoc® (Siemens Healthineers AG, Erlangen, Germany) and Piccolo Xpress® (Abaxis, Inc., Union City, CA, USA) devices and no studies of DRI-CHEM NX 500 (Fujifilm Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The review of implementation and clinical outcomes included six studies showing practice variation in the management decisions when a point-of-care device indicated an abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate. The review of cost-effectiveness evidence identified no relevant studies. The de novo decision model that was developed included a total of 14 strategies. Owing to limited data, the model included only i-STAT, ABL800 FLEX and StatSensor. In the base-case analysis, the cost-effective strategy appeared to be a three-step testing sequence involving initially screening all individuals for risk factors, point-of-care testing for those individuals with at least one risk factor, and including a final confirmatory laboratory test for individuals with a point-of-care-positive test result. Within this testing approach, the specific point-of-care device with the highest net benefit was i-STAT, although differences in net benefit with StatSensor were very small.

LIMITATIONS

There was insufficient evidence for patients with estimated glomerular filtration rates < 30 ml/minute/1.73 m2, and on the full potential health impact of delayed or rescheduled computed tomography scans or the use of alternative imaging modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

A three-step testing sequence combining a risk factor questionnaire with a point-of-care test and confirmatory laboratory testing appears to be a cost-effective use of NHS resources compared with current practice. The risk of contrast causing acute kidney injury to patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 30 ml/minute/1.73 m2 is uncertain. Cost-effectiveness of point-of-care testing appears largely driven by the potential of point-of-care tests to minimise delays within the current computed tomography pathway.

FUTURE WORK

Studies evaluating the impact of risk-stratifying questionnaires on workflow outcomes in computed tomography patients without recent estimated glomerular filtration rate results are needed.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018115818.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 24, No. 39. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Current comments on contrast media administration in patients with renal insufficiency

Contrast media administration has been associated with complications such as nephropathy, cardiovascular morbidity, and neurovascular events, particularly in patients with renal insufficiency. This association has been questioned in recent studies. This review was performed to summarize the most current evidence on contrast induced nephropathy (CIN), contributing factors, and considerations in patients with renal insufficiency. The risk of CIN was over-estimated by the previous studies, due to a lack of control groups or presence of non-randomized control groups, which led to a selection bias. However, the thresholds associated with an increased risk of CIN are controversial and require risk-benefit analysis on an individual basis. Regarding the administration of contrast media (CM) in the emergency setting, the majority of studies suggested that CM exposure does not meaningfully increase the risk of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients (including trauma patients). Several strategies have been suggested to reduce the risk of CIN, including volume expansion to increase renal blood flow, sodium bicarbonate or N-acetylcysteine administration, and use of low-osmolal contrast media in end-stage renal disease.

Perioperative intravenous contrast administration and the incidence of acute kidney injury after major gastrointestinal surgery: prospective, multicentre cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to determine the impact of preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast for CT and the risk of developing postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre cohort study included adults undergoing gastrointestinal resection, stoma reversal or liver resection. Both elective and emergency procedures were included. Preoperative exposure to intravenous contrast was defined as exposure to contrast administered for the purposes of CT up to 7 days before surgery. The primary endpoint was the rate of AKI within 7 days. Propensity score-matched models were adjusted for patient, disease and operative variables. In a sensitivity analysis, a propensity score-matched model explored the association between preoperative exposure to contrast and AKI in the first 48 h after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 5378 patients were included across 173 centres. Overall, 1249 patients (23·2 per cent) received intravenous contrast. The overall rate of AKI within 7 days of surgery was 13·4 per cent (718 of 5378). In the propensity score-matched model, preoperative exposure to contrast was not associated with AKI within 7 days (odds ratio (OR) 0·95, 95 per cent c.i. 0·73 to 1·21; P = 0·669). The sensitivity analysis showed no association between preoperative contrast administration and AKI within 48 h after operation (OR 1·09, 0·84 to 1·41; P = 0·498).

CONCLUSION

There was no association between preoperative intravenous contrast administered for CT up to 7 days before surgery and postoperative AKI. Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy should not be used as a reason to avoid contrast-enhanced CT.

Pathophysiology of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury (CIAKI)

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CIAKI) is a severe complication associated with the use of iodinated contrast media (CM); a sudden but potentially reversible fall in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) typically occurring 48-72 hours after CM administration. Principal risk factors related with the presentation of CIAKI are preexisting chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus. Studies on CIAKI present considerable complexity because of differences in CM type and dose, controversies in definition and baseline comorbidities. Despite that, it should be noted that CIAKI poses a serious health problem because it is a very common cause of hospitalacquired AKI, linked to increased morbidity and mortality and utilizing growing healthcare resources. The pathogenesis of CIAKI is heterogeneous and, thus, is incompletely understood. Three basic mechanisms appear to simultaneously occur for CIAKI development: Renal vasoconstriction and medullary hypoxia, tubular cell toxicity and reactive oxygen species formation. The relative contribution of each one of these mechanisms is unknown but they ultimately lead to epithelial and endothelial cell apoptosis and GFR reduction. Further research is needed in order to better clarify CIAKI pathophysiology and accordingly introduce effective preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Acute Renal Failure/Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Associated with Endovascular Procedures

AKI is one of the most common yet underdiagnosed postoperative complications that can occur after any type of surgery. Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is still poorly defined and due to a wide range of confounding individual variables, its risk is difficult to determine. CIN mainly affects patients with underlying chronic kidney disease, diabetes, sepsis, heart failure, acute coronary syndrome and cardiogenic shock. Further research is necessary to better understand pathophysiology of contrast-induced AKI and consequent implementation of effective prevention and therapeutic strategies. Although many therapies have been tested to avoid CIN, the only potent preventative strategy involves aggressive fluid administration and reduction of contrast volume. Regardless of surgical technique—open or endovascular—perioperative AKI is associated with significant morbidity, mortality and cost. Endovascular procedures always require administration of a contrast media, which may cause acute tubular necrosis or renal vascular embolization leading to renal ischemia and as a consequence, contribute to increased number of post-operative AKIs.