1
|
Calistri L, Nardi C, Rastrelli V, Maraghelli D, Grazioli L, Messerini L, Colagrande S. MRI of Peliosis Hepatis: A Case Series Presentation With a 2022 Systematic Literature Update. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 58:1386-1405. [PMID: 36988385 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peliosis hepatis (PH) is a rare benign condition, characterized by hepatic sinusoidal dilatation and blood-filled cystic cavities, often found incidentally, with still challenging diagnosis by imaging due to polymorphic appearance. PURPOSE Based on a retrospective analysis of our series (12 patients) and systematic literature review (1990-2022), to organize data about PH and identify features to improve characterization. STUDY TYPE Retrospective case series and systematic review. POPULATION Twelve patients (mean age 48 years, 55% female) with pathology-proven PH and 49 patients (mean age 52 years, 67% female) identified in 33 studies from the literature (1990-2022). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 1,5-T; T1-weighted (T1W), T2-weighted (T2W), diffusion-weighted (DW), contrast-enhanced (CE) T1W imaging. ASSESSMENT We compared our series and literature data in terms of demographic (gender/age/ethnicity), clinical characteristics (symptoms/physical examination/liver test), associated conditions (malignancies/infectious/hematologic/genetic or chronic disorders/drugs or toxic exposure) percentage. On magnetic resonance imaging lesion numbers/shape/mean maximum diameter/location/mass effect/signal intensity were compared. PH pathological type/proposed imaging diagnosis/patient follow-up were also considered. STATISTICAL TESTS Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports/Series quality assessment. Intraclass correlation and Cohen's kappa coefficients for levels of inter/intrareader agreement in our experience. RESULTS Patients were mainly asymptomatic (92% vs. 70% in our study and literature) with associated conditions (83% vs. 80%). Lesions showed homogeneous T1W-hypointensity (58% vs. 65%) and T2W-hyperintensity (58% vs. 66%). Heterogeneous nonspecific (25% vs. 51%), centrifugal (34% vs. 8%), or rim-like centripetal (25% vs. 23%) patterns of enhancement were most frequent, with hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase (HBP), without restricted diffusivity. Good inter- and intrareader agreement was observed in our experience. Concerning JBI Checklist, 19 out of 31 case reports met at least 7 out of 8 criteria, whereas 2 case series fulfilled 5 and 6 out of 10 items respectively. DATA CONCLUSION A homogeneous, not well-demarcated T1W-hypointense and T2W-hyperintense mass, with heterogeneous nonspecific or rim-like centripetal or centrifugal pattern of enhancement, and hypointensity on HBP, may be helpful for PH diagnosis. Among associated conditions, malignancies and drug exposures were the most frequent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Calistri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Cosimo Nardi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Vieri Rastrelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Davide Maraghelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Luigi Grazioli
- Department of Radiology, University of Brescia "Spedali Civili", Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Messerini
- Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefano Colagrande
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences, Radiodiagnostic Unit n. 2, University of Florence, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grazzini G, Cozzi D, Flammia F, Grassi R, Agostini A, Belfiore MP, Borgheresi A, Mazzei MA, Floridi C, Carrafiello G, Giovagnoni A, Pradella S, Miele V. Hepatic tumors: pitfall in diagnostic imaging. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2020; 91:9-17. [PMID: 32945274 PMCID: PMC7944669 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v91i8-s.9969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 06/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
On computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), hepatocellular tumors are characterized based on typical imaging findings. However, hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, and hepatocellular carcinoma can show uncommon appearances at CT and MRI, which may lead to diagnostic challenges. When assessing focal hepatic lesions, radiologists need to be aware of these atypical imaging findings to avoid misdiagnoses that can alter the management plan. The purpose of this review is to illustrate a variety of pitfalls and atypical features of hepatocellular tumors that can lead to misinterpretations providing specific clues to the correct diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Grazzini
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Diletta Cozzi
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Federica Flammia
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
| | - Andrea Agostini
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche and Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi", Ancona, Italy.
| | - Maria Paola Belfiore
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Borgheresi
- Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi", Ancona, Italy.
| | - Maria Antonietta Mazzei
- Unit of Diagnostic Imaging, Department of Medical, Surgical and Neuro Sciences and of Radiological Sciences, University of Siena, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
| | - Chiara Floridi
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche and Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi", Ancona, Italy.
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy..
| | - Andrea Giovagnoni
- Department of Clinical, Special and Dental Sciences, University Politecnica delle Marche and Division of Special and Pediatric Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital "Umberto I - Lancisi - Salesi", Ancona, Italy.
| | - Silvia Pradella
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| | - Vittorio Miele
- Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schulz A, Joelsen-Hatlehol ES, Brudvik KW, Aasand KK, Hanekamp B, Viktil E, Johansen CK, Dormagen JB. Preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases: DWI alone or combined with MDCT is no substitute for Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Acta Radiol 2020; 61:302-311. [PMID: 31335157 DOI: 10.1177/0284185119864000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with hepatocyte specific contrast has the highest sensitivity for colorectal liver metastases but comes at high costs and long examination times. Purpose To evaluate if preoperative detection of colorectal liver metastases with less resource-consuming diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) alone or in combination with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) can compete with gadolinium-etoxybenzyl-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI. Material and Methods Forty-four patients with 123 colorectal liver metastases received MDCT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI including DWI before liver resection for colorectal liver metastases. Five image sets were evaluated by two radiologists. The DWI set consisted of DWI, ADC map, coronal, axial T2-weighted single-shot sequences. The DWI-T2F set contained additionally respiratory-triggered T2-weighted TSE-SPIR sequences. The MDCT set consisted of four-phase MDCT, the MDCT-DWI set also contained DWI. The CE-MRI set contained all MRI sequences including Gd-EOB-DTPA. Reference standards was histopathology and follow-up. Results CE-MRI set had highest sensitivity ( P ≤ 0.013) with 95% compared to 72%, 73%, 73%, and 87% the for DWI set, DWI-T2W-FS set, MDCT set, and MDCT-DWI set, respectively. The CE-MRI set had the highest sensitivity ( P≤0.012) for colorectal liver metastases <10 mm with 87% compared to 55%, 52%, 23%, and 58% for the DWI set, DWI-T2W-FS set, MDCT set, and MDCT-DWI set, respectively. The MDCT-DWI set improved sensitivity overall and in size-dependent subgroup analyses compared to the MDCT set ( P ≤ 0.031). The MDCT-DWI set showed the highest specificity of 98% followed by 98%, 98%, 95%, and 88% for the DWI set, DWI-T2W-FS set, MDCT set, and CE-MRI set, respectively. Conclusion The less resource and time-consuming DWI sets are inferior to Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with its excellent sensitivity should be the preferred preoperative modality when meticulous lesion identification is essential. Combination of DWI with MDCT improved significantly sensitivity compared to each modality alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anselm Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Bettina Hanekamp
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Ellen Viktil
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | - Cathrine K Johansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Manetta R, Capretti I, Belleggia N, Marsecano C, Viscido A, Bruno F, Arrigoni F, Ma L, Guglielmi G, Splendiani A, Di Cesare E, Masciocchi C, Barile A. Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and ultrasonography (US) in the study of the small bowel in Crohn's disease: state of the art and review of the literature. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:38-50. [PMID: 31085972 PMCID: PMC6625566 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i5-s.8337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Crohn’s disease (CD) is a chronic idiopathic disease and its diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical symptoms, laboratory tests and imaging data. There isn’t a diagnostic gold standard: the ileocolonoscopy with mucosal biopsies represents the standard for luminal disease, while cross-sectional imaging such as Ultrasound (US), Computed Tomography (CT) or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can show transmural alterations and extraintestinal manifestations. CD is usually diagnosed in the young age and after baseline diagnosis, the patients have to undergo to variable follow-up depending on remission or active disease. The aim of our review is to compare Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) to Ultrasonography (US) in the follow-up of CD. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Manetta
- Division of Radiology, S. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bevilacqua A, D'Amuri FV, Pagnini F, Sabatino V, Russo U, Maggialetti N, Palumbo P, Pradella S, Giovagnoni A, Miele V, De Filippo M. Percutaneous needle biopsy of retroperitoneal lesions: technical developments. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:62-67. [PMID: 31085974 PMCID: PMC6625572 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i5-s.8331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Percutaneous Needle Biopsy (PNB) is the insertion of a needle into a suspected lesion or an organ with the aim to obtain cells or tissue for diagnosis. It’s a relatively non-invasive procedure and is performed by radiologist under guidance of imaging techniques such as ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography CT (PET-CT). The choice of imaging technique depends on the evaluation of the target lesion and patient compliance. PNB includes two categories: fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) that is the use of a thin needle (18-25 gauge) to extract cells for cytological evaluation; and core needle biopsy (CNB) that is the use of a larger needle (9-20 gauge) to extract a piece of tissue for histological evaluation. The indications for biopsy are the characterization of nature (benign or malignant) of a lesion, diagnosis and staging of tumor, and biological or immunohistochemical/genetic analisys on tissue. Success of PNB is the procurement of sufficient material to characterize lesions and to guide the patient outcome. Major complications are rare. PNB became a useful technique in diagnosis and study of retroperitoneal lesions, because of a more suitable access to specific intra-abdominal structures, lowering the risk of injury of interposed structures (such as bowel, great vessels). (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Bevilacqua
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Unit of Radiologic Science, University of Parma, Maggiore Hospital, Parma, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lanzetta MM, Masserelli A, Addeo G, Cozzi D, Maggialetti N, Danti G, Bartolini L, Pradella S, Giovagnoni A, Miele V. Internal hernias: a difficult diagnostic challenge. Review of CT signs and clinical findings. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:20-37. [PMID: 31085971 PMCID: PMC6625567 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i5-s.8344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Although internal hernias are uncommon, they must be beared in mind in the differential diagnosis in cases of intestinal obstruction, especially in patients with no history of previous surgery or trauma. Because of the high possibility of strangulation and ischemia of the affected loops, internal hernias represent a potentially life-threatening condition and surgical emergency that needs to be quickly recognized and managed promptly. Imaging plays a leading role in the diagnosis and in particular multidetector computed tomography (MDCT), with its thin-section and high-resolution multiplanar reformatted (MPR) images, represents the first line image technique in these patients. The purpose of the present paper is to illustrate the characteristic anatomic location, the clinical findings and the CT appearance associated with main types of internal hernia, including paraduodenal, foramen of Winslow, pericecal, sigmoid-mesocolon- and trans-mesenteric-related, transomental, supravesical and pelvic hernias. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Collapse
|
7
|
Reginelli A, Vacca G, Zanaletti N, Troiani T, Natella R, Maggialetti N, Palumbo P, Giovagnoni A, Ciardiello F, Cappabianca S. Diagnostic value/performance of radiological liver imaging during chemoterapy for gastrointestinal malignancy: a critical review. ACTA BIO-MEDICA : ATENEI PARMENSIS 2019; 90:51-61. [PMID: 31085973 PMCID: PMC6625573 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i5-s.8346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
This article reviews the main toxic effect, complications and relative imaging findings of the liver that may appear during the oncologic follow up among patients affected by gastrointestinal malignancy. Awareness of the causative chemotherapeutic agent and regimens, pathophysiology and relative characteristic imaging findings of hepatic injuries is critical in order to obtain an accurate diagnosis especially when these parenchymal lesions are focal. An accurate synergic radiological diagnosis with Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) techniques may induce a potential termination of ineffective/toxic chemotherapy during early phases of treatment, changing the therapeutic plan in order to avoid first unnecessary liver biopsy and then invasive treatment as hepatic resection if not required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Reginelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dioguardi Burgio M, Ronot M, Paulatto L, Terraz S, Vilgrain V, Brancatelli G. Avoiding Pitfalls in the Interpretation of Gadoxetic Acid–Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2016; 37:561-572. [DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2016.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
9
|
Schulz A, Viktil E, Godt JC, Johansen CK, Dormagen JB, Holtedahl JE, Labori KJ, Bach-Gansmo T, Kløw NE. Diagnostic performance of CT, MRI and PET/CT in patients with suspected colorectal liver metastases: the superiority of MRI. Acta Radiol 2016; 57:1040-8. [PMID: 26622057 DOI: 10.1177/0284185115617349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/21/2015] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meticulous imaging of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is mandatory to optimize outcome after liver resection. However, the detection of CRLM is still challenging. PURPOSE To evaluate prospectively if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced sequences had a better diagnostic performance for CRLM compared to computed tomography (CT) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET/CT). MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-six patients scheduled for resection of suspected CRLM were evaluated prospectively from September 2011 to January 2013. None of the patients had undergone previous treatment for their CRLM. Multiphase CT, liver MRI with diffusion-weighted and dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced sequences and low-dose PET/CT were performed. Two independent, blinded readers evaluated the examinations. The reference standard was histopathological confirmation (81/140 CRLM) or follow-up. RESULTS A total of 140 CRLM and 196 benign lesions were identified. On a per-lesion basis, MRI had the significantly highest sensitivity overall and for CRLM < 10 mm (P < 0.001). Overall sensitivity/specificity and PPV/NPV were 68%/94% and 89%/81% for CT, 90%/87% and 82%/93% for MRI, and 61%/99% and 97%/78% for PET/CT. For CRLM < 10 mm it was 16%/96% and 54%/80% for CT, 74%/88% and 64%/93% for MRI, and 9%/98% and 57%/79% for PET/CT. CONCLUSION MRI had the significantly highest sensitivity compared with CT and PET/CT, particularly for CRLM < 10 mm. Therefore, detection of CRLM should be based on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anselm Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ellen Viktil
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Johannes Clemens Godt
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Cathrine K Johansen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | | | - Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tore Bach-Gansmo
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nils-Einar Kløw
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diagnostic confidence of computed tomography and magnetic resonance in focal liver pathology. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 27:97-101. [PMID: 25370854 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000000231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic confidence of multiphase computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) after administration of gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) in the diagnosis of malignant-benign neoplasm of the liver in operators with different levels of experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty patients underwent multiphase CT and MR after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA. All exams were evaluated by two experienced observers independently; they rated their diagnostic confidence on a five-degree scale: 1 (certainly benign), 2 (probably benign), 3 (uncertain), 4 (probably malignant) and 5 (certainly malignant). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC) were carried out for each observer and their difference was tested according to the different methodologies used. RESULTS In our population, there were 15 malignant neoplasms and 25 benign neoplasms. For the CT analysis, AUC was 0.792 [SE=0.088; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.634-0.903] and 0.701 (SE=0.099; 95% CI 0.535-0.835) for observers 1 and 2, respectively, whereas for the MR analysis, AUC was 0.923 (SE=0.058; 95% CI 0.793-0.983) and 0.934 (SE=0.054; 95% CI 0.808-0.987). For both observers, a statistically significant difference was found in diagnostic confidence between the AUC of CT and MR (P<0.05). CONCLUSION Our results indicate that, for expert and intermediate experience observers, the diagnostic confidence using MR with Gd-EOB-DTPA is statistically significantly superior to CT with a multiphase technique.
Collapse
|
11
|
Lee JM, Park JW, Choi BI. 2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma: HCC diagnostic algorithm. Dig Dis 2014; 32:764-77. [PMID: 25376295 DOI: 10.1159/000368020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most commonly occurring cancer in Korea and typically has a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of only 28.6%. Therefore, it is of paramount importance to achieve the earliest possible diagnosis of HCC and to recommend the most up-to-date optimal treatment strategy in order to increase the survival rate of patients who develop this disease. After the establishment of the Korean Liver Cancer Study Group (KLCSG) and the National Cancer Center (NCC), Korea jointly produced for the first time the Clinical Practice Guidelines for HCC in 2003, revised them in 2009, and published the newest revision of the guidelines in 2014, including changes in the diagnostic criteria of HCC and incorporating the most recent medical advances over the past 5 years. In this review, we will address the noninvasive diagnostic criteria and diagnostic algorithm of HCC included in the newly established KLCSG-NCC guidelines in 2014, and review the differences in the criteria for a diagnosis of HCC between the KLCSG-NCC guidelines and the most recent imaging guidelines endorsed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) system, the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) and the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Min Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lin YH, Hwang RM, Chen BB, Hsu CY, Yu CW, Kao JH, Lee HS, Liang PC, Wei SY, Shih TTF. Vascular and hepatic enhancements at MR imaging: comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA in the same subjects. Clin Imaging 2014; 38:287-291. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2014.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2013] [Revised: 12/19/2013] [Accepted: 01/06/2014] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|