Financial illiteracy among internal medicine, surgery, and radiology residents regarding medical imaging costs in the Netherlands

PURPOSE

To assess the knowledge of internal medicine, surgery, and radiology residents of medical imaging costs at a university hospital in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among internal medicine, surgery, and radiology residents at a tertiary care university hospital to determine their knowledge and view on medical imaging costs. Participants were asked to estimate the costs of a two-view chest X-ray, unenhanced CT of the brain, unenhanced MRI of the brain, contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and abdomen, ultrasound of the complete abdomen, and FDG-PET and PSMA-PET torso. Estimates within ± 25% of the available published costs were considered accurate.

RESULTS

A total of 44 participants (18 in internal medicine, 15 in surgery, and 11 in radiology) were included. No resident accurately estimated all imaging costs, with accuracies ranging from 18% for contrast-enhanced CT of the chest and abdomen to 39% for two-view chest X-rays. Cost estimation accuracy did not significantly vary by specialty or training duration. Most participants were concerned about the affordability of medical care within or beyond the next five years (80%, 95%), 66% of residents felt that doctors bear responsibility for limiting healthcare costs, and 89% agreed that education about the financial aspects of medical imaging is useful.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that residents are financially illiterate regarding medical imaging costs, and neither the duration of training nor specialty influences their knowledge levels. Nevertheless, residents share common concerns and responsibilities about rising healthcare costs and express a desire for additional education regarding the finance of medical imaging.

KEY POINTS

Question Assessing the knowledge levels of residents regarding medical imaging costs provides valuable information for policymakers involved in the design of medical curricula. Findings Residents from internal medicine, surgery, and radiology demonstrate limited knowledge of medical imaging costs but appear eager to learn. Clinical relevance There is a need to educate residents about the costs of medical imaging, promote the efficient use of limited resources, and reduce overall healthcare expenses.

Expenditure mapping of pediatric imaging costs using a resource utilization band analysis of claims data

OBJECTIVE

To segregate imaging expenditures from claims data by resource utilization bands (RUBs) and underlying conditions to create an "expenditure map" of pediatric imaging costs.

METHODS

A Claims data for children enrolled in a commercial value-based plan were categorized by RUB 0 non-user, 1 healthy user, 2 low morbidity, 3 moderate morbidity, 4 high morbidity, & 5 very high morbidity. The per member per year (PMPY) expense, total imaging spend, and imaging modality with the highest spend were assessed for each RUB. Diagnosis categories associated with high imaging costs were also evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 40,022 pediatric plan members. 14% had imaging-related claims accounting for approximately $2.8 million in expenditures. Member distribution and mean PMPY expenditure RUB was respectively: RUB 0 (3,037, $0), RUB 1 (6,604, $7), RUB 2 - 13,698, $27), RUB 3 - 13,341, $87), RUB 4 (2,810, $268), RUB 5 (532, $841). RUB 3 had the largest total imaging costs at $1,159,523. The imaging modality with the greatest mean PMPY expense varied by RUB with radiography highest in lower RUBs and MRI highest in higher RUBs. The top 3 diagnoses associated with the highest total imaging costs were developmental disorders ($443,980), asthma ($388,797), and congenital heart disease ($294,977) and greatest mean PMPY imaging expenditures malignancy/leukemia ($3,100), transplant ($2,639), and tracheostomy ($1,661).

DISCUSSION

Expense mapping using claims data allows for a better understanding of the distribution of imaging costs across a covered pediatric population. This tool may assist organizations in planning effective cost-reduction initiatives and learning how imaging utilization varies by patient complexity in their system.

Variation in physician spending and its association with postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is significant variation in inpatient expenditures among physicians and hospitals. This study aimed to characterize the association between variation in physician spending and short-term outcomes among patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgery for PDAC and CRC from 2010 to 2020 were identified using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result-Medicare-linked database. The cohort was divided into quartiles based on adjusted physician spending, and multivariate models were used to assess the association between physician spending and patient outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 27,596 Medicare beneficiaries, 25,615 (92.8%) underwent surgery for CRC and 1981 (7.2%) underwent surgery for PDAC. Of the variations in spending, 79.9% were due to patient-level factors, 13.3% were due to hospital characteristics, and 6.8% were due to surgeon-level variables. On multivariate analysis, there was no association between physician spending and 30-day readmission (with complications: first quartile [Q1], reference; Q4: odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.86-1.41; P = .123; without complications: Q1, reference; Q3, stage IV: OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.68-1.40; P = .882) or between physician spending and 30-day mortality (without complications: Q1, reference; Q2, stage I: OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.45-3.01; P = .804). However, an increase in physician spending was associated with higher 30-day mortality among patients with complications (Q1, reference; Q4: OR, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.72-3.03; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

There was more variation in healthcare spending across hospitals than across individual physicians. No consistent association between variation in physician spending and patient outcomes was noted. Wasteful spending can be reduced through targeted interventions aimed at reducing variations at the physician and hospital levels.

A Narrative Review on Financial Challenges and Health Care Costs Associated with Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a highly prevalent and potentially severe medical condition. Challenges regarding TBI management are related to accurate diagnostics, defining its severity, and establishing prompt interventions to affect outcomes. Among the health care components in the TBI handling strategy is intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, which is fundamental to therapy decisions. However, ICP monitoring is an Achilles tendon, imposing a significant financial burden on health care systems, particularly in middle and low-income communities. This article arises from the understanding from the authors that there is insufficient scientific evidence about the potential economic impacts from the use of noninvasive technologies in the monitoring of TBI. Based on personal experience, as well as from reading other, clinically focused studies, the thesis is that the use of such technologies could greatly affect the health care system and this article seeks to address this lack of literature, show ways in which such systems could be evaluated, and show estimations of possible results from these investigations.

OBJECTIVE

This review primarily investigates the economic burden of TBI and whether new technologies are suitable to reduce its health care costs without compromising the quality of care, according to the levels of evidence available. The objective is to stimulate more research and attention in the area.

METHODS

For this narrative review, a PubMed search was conducted for articles discussing TBI health care costs, as well as monitoring technologies (tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, optic nerve sheath diameter, transcranial Doppler, pupillometry, and noninvasive ICP waveform) and their application in managing TBI. Strategies were first evaluated from a medical noninferiority perspective before calculating the average savings of each selected strategy. All applicable studies were analyzed for quality using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 Statement117 and this article was written to conform as much as possible with it.

RESULTS

The review included 109 references and showed a consistent potential in noninvasive technologies to reduce costs and maintain or improve the quality of care.

CONCLUSIONS

TBI prevalence has increased with a disproportionate health care burden in the last decades. Noninvasive monitoring techniques seem to be effective in reducing TBI health care costs, with few limitations, especially the need for more supporting scientific evidence. The undeniable clinical and financial potential of these techniques is compelling to further investigate their role in TBI management, as well as the creation of more comprehensive monitoring models to the understanding of complex phenomena occurring in the injured brain.

The role of human capital and stress for cost awareness in the healthcare system: a survey among German hospital physicians

BACKGROUND

Germany has the highest per capita health care spending among EU member states, but its hospitals face pressure to generate profits independently due to the government's withdrawal of investment cost coverage. The diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment system was implemented to address the cost issue, challenging hospital physicians to provide services within predefined prices and an economic target corridor to reduce costs. This study examines the extent of cost awareness among medical personnel in German hospitals and its influencing factors.

METHODS

We developed an online survey in which participants across all specialties in hospitals estimated the prices in euros of four common interventions and answered questions about their human capital and perceived stress on the workplace. As a measure of cost awareness, we used the probability of estimating the prices correctly within a reasonable margin. We employed logit logistic regression estimators to identify influencing factors in a sample of 86 participants.

RESULTS

The results revealed that most of the respondents were unaware of the costs of common interventions. General human capital, acquired through prior education, and job-specific human capital had no influence on cost awareness, whereas domain-specific human capital, that is, gaining economic knowledge based on self-interest, had a positive nonlinear effect on cost awareness. Furthermore, an increased stress level negatively influenced cost awareness.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper is the first of its kind for the German health care sector that contributes responses to the question whether health care professionals in German hospitals have cost awareness and if not, what reasons lie behind this lack of knowledge. Our findings show that the cost awareness desired by the introduction of the DRG system has yet to be achieved by medical personnel.

Patient-level factors influencing adherence to follow-up imaging recommendations

PURPOSE

To determine which, if any, patient-level factors were associated with differences in completion of follow-up imaging recommendations at a tertiary academic medical center.

METHODS

In this IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study, approximately one month of imaging recommendations were reviewed from 2017 at a single academic institution that contained key words recommending follow-up imaging. Age, gender, race/ethnicity, insurance, smoking history, primary language, BMI, and home address were recorded via chart extraction. Home addresses were geocoded to Census Block Groups and assigned to a quintile of neighborhood socioeconomic status. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to evaluate each predictor variable with significance set to p = 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 13,421 imaging reports that included additional follow-up recommendations were identified. Of the 1013 included reports that recommended follow-up, 350 recommended additional imaging and were analyzed. Three hundred eight (88.00%) had corresponding follow-up imaging present and the insurance payor was known for 266 (86.36%) patients: 146 (47.40%) had commercial insurance, 35 (11.36%) had Medicaid, and 85 (27.60%) had Medicare. Patients with Medicaid had over four times lower odds of completing follow-up imaging compared to patients with commercial insurance (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.88, p = 0.032). Age, gender, race/ethnicity, smoking history, primary language, BMI, and neighborhood socioeconomic status were not independently associated with differences in follow-up imaging completion.

CONCLUSION

Patients with Medicaid had decreased odds of completing follow-up imaging recommendations compared to patients with commercial insurance.

Cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at Universitas Academic Hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa

Background

South Africa has high healthcare expenses. Improving cost-consciousness could decrease government expenditure on healthcare.

Objectives

To determine cost awareness of radiological studies among doctors at a tertiary hospital. The objective was met by assessing the accuracy of cost estimation according to the level of training and speciality, whether participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness and if they had a desire to learn more about the cost of radiological imaging.

Method

A cross-sectional survey was conducted in six clinical departments at Universitas Academic Hospital using an anonymous questionnaire that determined doctors’ cost awareness of five radiological studies. Each radiological study was answered using six different cost ranges, with one correct option. Costs were based on the Department of Health’s 2019 Uniform Patients Fee Schedule (UPFS).

Results

In total, 131 (67.2%) of 195 questionnaires distributed to registrars and consultants were returned. Overall, low accuracy of cost estimation was observed, with 45.2% of the participants choosing only incorrect options. No participant estimated all five costs correctly. Only the Internal Medicine clinicians demonstrated a significant difference between registrars and consultants for the number of correct answers (median 0 and 1, respectively) (p = 0.04). No significant differences were found between specialities stratified by registrars/consultants. Most participants (88.6%) would like to learn about imaging costs. Only 2.3% of the participants had received prior education/training related to cost awareness of radiological studies.

Conclusion

Doctors were consistently inaccurate in estimating the cost of radiological studies. Educating doctors about the cost of radiological imaging could have a positive effect on healthcare expenditure.

Pediatric radiologist-driven didactics for a pediatric residency program: a quality initiative

BACKGROUND

Pediatric residents exhibit knowledge gaps in appropriateness of imaging utilization.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the value of radiologist-driven imaging education in a pediatric residency program. The primary goals of this educational program were to provide pediatric residents with resources such as the American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria, support optimal resource utilization and patient care, increase resident understanding of radiation risk, and determine the value of integrating radiologists into pediatric education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A needs assessment was performed in which the chief residents of a large pediatric program were surveyed. The consensus of chief residents was that a four-part lecture series delivered by a pediatric radiology fellow would be beneficial to the pediatric residents. Topics included general radiation risk as well as basic imaging topics in the chest, abdomen, neurological system, extremities and vasculature. Each lecture integrated appropriate ordering, ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable)/Image Gently, and basic image interpretation. Residents were asked, using a Likert scale, to rate their understanding of radiation risk, the ACR Appropriateness Criteria, and other topics of interest before and after each lecture. Pediatric residents were given a 10-item quiz before and after the lecture series to assess their knowledge regarding the best test to order in clinical scenarios.

RESULTS

The average pre-lecture score for knowledge of radiation risk was 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.02-3.51) out of 5, which improved to 4.27 (95% CI: 4.09-4.57) post-lecture. There was an increase in understanding of ACR appropriateness, with pre-lecture rating of knowledge increasing from 1.91 (95% CI 1.54-2.29) out of 5 to 3.61 (95% CI 3.33-3.90) post-lecture. The residents averaged 82.7% (95% CI 77.3%-88.1%) on the appropriateness pre-test and 93.8% (95% CI 90.3%-97.2%) on the post-test. Residents provided positive feedback upon conclusion of the program and reported a beneficial effect on their education.

CONCLUSION

A radiologist-driven lecture series in a pediatric residency can improve resident understanding of appropriate ordering practices and radiation risk. Radiologist participation in pediatric residency training is well-received.

Evaluating Radiology Result Communication in the Emergency Department

PURPOSE

To assess the pattern of result communication that occurs between radiologists and referring physicians in the emergency department setting.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved prospective study was performed at a large academic medical center with 24/7 emergency radiology cover. Emergency radiologists logged information regarding all result-reporting communication events that occurred over a 168-hour period.

RESULTS

A total of 286 independent result communication events occurred during the study period, the vast majority of which occurred via telephone (232/286). Emergency radiologists spent 10% of their working time communicating results. Similar amounts of time were spent discussing negative and positive cross-sectional imaging examinations. In a small minority of communication events, additional information was gathered through communication that resulted in a change of interpretation from a normal to an abnormal study.

CONCLUSIONS

Effective and efficient result communication is critical to care delivery in the emergency department setting. Discussion regarding abnormal cases, both in person and over the phone, is encouraged. However, in the emergency setting, time spent on routine direct communication of negative examination results in advance of the final report may lead to increased disruptions, longer turnaround times, and negatively impact patient care. In very few instances, does the additional information gained from the communication event result in a change of interpretation?

Neuroimaging of Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Pearls and Pitfalls

A brief introduction is provided of the different imaging modalities encountered in the intensive care unit (ICU). The spectrum of intracranial pathology as well as potential postsurgical complications is reviewed, with a focus on pearls and pitfalls. A brief overview also is provided of imaging of the spine in an ICU patient.

Orthopedic Surgeons Have Inadequate Knowledge of the Cost of Trauma-Related Imaging Studies

Radiographic imaging is integral to the diagnosis and treatment of orthopedic injuries. Previous studies have shown that orthopedists consistently underestimate the price of implants, but their knowledge of imaging charges is unknown. This study evaluated whether orthopedic residents and faculty could accurately estimate charges of imaging modalities at their respective institutions. A survey with 10 common imaging studies was sent to 8 academic level I trauma centers. Participants estimated the total charge of each imaging modality. This was compared with the actual charge at their institution. Seven centers produced 162 responders: 74 faculty and 88 residents. The differences between the estimated cost and the billing charge were calculated and broken down by training level and imaging modality. Overall, imaging charges were underestimated by 31% (P<.001), with 19.4% of estimates being within 20% of actual charges (95% confidence interval, 19.1-19.9). There was no difference between training levels (P=.69). There was greater than 1000% variation in charges between institutions. Orthopedists across training levels underestimate hospital charges associated with common imaging studies, and there is a large variation in charges between centers. Awareness of charges is important because charges affect clinical decision making and are relevant to practicing both cost-conscious and clinically sound medicine. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):e454-e459.].

Awareness of surgical expenditure amongst UK trainees and consultants: A questionnaire study

INTRODUCTION

Limited knowledge of surgical device and service costs restricts a surgeon's ability to make cost efficient choices and contribute to the efficiency savings required by the NHS to reduce the financial deficit. This study aims to assess how aware surgeons are of surgical equipment and regularly used services.

METHODS

A single sided hard copy questionnaire asking for the estimate cost of 24 surgical devices/services was handed out to individuals at two separate UK annual conferences. Items and services which are regularly used and/or clinically significant were selected and, where possible, alternatives to those items were included for comparison. Participants were also asked for their grade and specialty. An estimate was deemed correct if it was within 20% of the actual cost. Planned subgroup analyses for grade and specialty were performed.

RESULTS

The 143 participants consisted of 23 (16%) consultants, 39 (27%) registrars, 33 (23%) SHOs and 48 (34%) foundation doctors. Of the 95 participants who were SHO grade or more senior, 67 (71%) work within general surgery. Across all items, only 9.6% of estimates were correct. There was no statistically significant difference between training levels (consultant 11.5%, registrar 10.1%, SHO 8.6%, foundation 8.9%; p = 0.253). Participants were significantly less successful in correctly estimating the cost of high value (>£150 [USD $198; EUR €175]) items (8.5% vs. 11.1%); p = 0.011, and the cost of devices as compared to the cost of services (7.4% vs. 15.0%); p = 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons across all grades and specialties have poor knowledge of device and service costs. It is important that this improves in order to allow surgeons to make a meaningful contribution to NHS efficiency savings by making informed decisions about their use of devices and services.

Changes in Medicare Reimbursement for Advanced Upper Extremity Imaging

PURPOSE

Advanced noninvasive imaging of the upper extremity joints, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US) , has numerous applications in the evaluation of musculoskeletal pathology. Choice of modality is influenced by clinical and cost concerns, with US and CT traditionally considered less expensive than MRI. We analyzed the changes in Medicare reimbursement for these imaging modalities with the hypothesis that recent reimbursement decreases in MRI have made this modality more cost-competitive than other commonly used imaging modalities.

METHODS

Using the Medicare Fee Schedule Database, we reviewed the Medicare reimbursements fee schedule for CT, US, and MRI from 2000 to 2015 at the national, regional, and state levels. Charges were identified and queried by Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for each modality. Changes in reimbursement were calculated for each of the modalities.

RESULTS

Total (technical and professional) reimbursement for MRI decreased from $516.93 to $237.16 between 2007 and 2015. Adjusted for inflation, this represents a 60% decrease in reimbursement. During the same time period, total (technical and professional) reimbursement for CT decreased from $256.95 to $180.03, a 39% decrease adjusted for inflation. Total (technical and professional) reimbursement for US increased over the same time period, from $98.91 to $118.22 in 2015, in conjunction with changes in the CPT coding for US. Total (technical and professional) MRI reimbursement decreased from 5.23 times the reimbursement of US in 2007 to 2.01 times in 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

In concordance with our hypothesis, these findings demonstrate that upper extremity MRI and CT reimbursements as scheduled by Medicare have declined significantly in recent years and that these modalities are approaching financial parity with wrist US. In spite of these decreases, MRI remains the most costly advanced imaging modality. Depending on each clinical scenario, the added cost may be justified by the value added by the type of information that can be garnered from each study. Cost-analysis studies evaluating the clinical application of MRI performed prior to the reimbursement decline should be evaluated with caution, and cost-benefit analyses based on these data are at risk of being out-of-date.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Analysis IV.

Neuroimaging of Adults with Headache: Appropriateness, Utilization, and an Economical Overview

One of the most common reasons that a patient seeks out a health care provider for a neuroscience-related issue is headache. Not all patients can, or probably should, be imaged with headache. We must use an approach that attends to scientific evidence, accepted guidelines, and available resources. This approach should focus on quality, safety, appropriateness, and utilization. This article reviews and discusses the consideration of imaging adult patients with headache.

Utility of repeat magnetic resonance imaging in surgical patients with lumbar stenosis without disc herniation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis is becoming more prevalent due to the aging population. Currently, there is no clinical guideline to clarify the utility of repeat MRI in patients with lumbar stenosis, without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniation.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the utility of routine use of MRI as a diagnostic tool in lumbar stenosis, and to help formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective radiographic analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Retrospective chart review was performed to review patients with lumbar stenosis, who underwent lumbar decompression without fusion from 2011 to 2015 at a single institution.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Previously established stenosis grading systems were used to measure and compare the initial and the subsequent repeat lumbar MRIs performed preoperatively. If patients were found to have a moderate or severe grade change, and if the surgical plan was altered due to such exacerbated radiographic findings, then their grade changes were considered clinically meaningful.

METHODS

We identified patients with lumbar stenosis without radiographic instability or neurological deficits, who had at least two preoperative lumbar MRIs performed and underwent decompressive surgeries. At each pathologic disc level, the absolute value of the change in grade for central and lateral recess stenosis, right foraminal stenosis, and left foraminal stenosis from the first preoperative MRI to the repeated MRI was calculated. These changed data were then used to calculate the mean and median changes in each of the three types of stenosis for each pathologic disc level. Identical calculations were carried out for the subsample of patients who only underwent discectomy or had a discectomy included as part of their surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 37 of those patients had more than one level surgically addressed, and a total of 161 lumbar levels were reviewed. Among the subset of patients that had any grade change, the majority of the grades only had a mild change of 1 (36 out of 42 patients, 85.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 73.1%-94.1%); there was a moderate grade change of 2 in two patients (4.8%, CI: 0.8%-14.0%), and a severe change of 3 in one patient (2.4%, CI: 0.2%-10.1%). There were three patients with decreased grade change (7.1%, CI: 1.8%-17.5%). All clinically meaningful grade changes were from the subset of patients who had only discectomy or discectomy as part of the procedure. Lastly, both patients that had a clinically meaningful grade change had their MRIs performed at an interval of greater than 360 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiographic evaluation of the utility of routinely repeated MRIs in lumbar stenosis without instability, neurological deficits, or disc herniations demonstrated that there were no significant changes found in the repeated MRI in the preoperative setting, especially if the MRIs were performed less than one year apart. The results of this present study can help to standardize the diagnostic evaluation of lumbar stenosis and to formulate clinical guidelines on the appropriate use of preoperative imaging for lumbar stenosis patients.

Good Samaritan Laws and Graduate Medical Education: A Tristate Survey

Objective

To assess the awareness of Good Samaritan laws among residents and fellows and the factors affecting the likelihood of a physician-in-training performing a Good Samaritan act.

Participants and Methods

A survey was distributed via official e-mail to Mayo Clinic residents and fellows at Mayo Clinic’s 3 locations: Rochester, Minnesota; Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida. The survey was open from August 4 to 25, 2015, at the Arizona and Florida sites and from August 10 to 31, 2015, at the Minnesota site. Responses were collected anonymously and analyzed, using descriptive statistics and regression models.

Results

The survey was sent to 1591 trainees and 19.7% (313) responded. Nearly half the respondents (49%) experienced a medical emergency that required assistance by a medically trained person and reported that increased medicolegal knowledge would increase their likelihood of helping (47%). Almost all (93.6%) felt that awareness of the Good Samaritan laws was essential for a medical professional and reported a need for further education to increase their knowledge (89.3%).

Conclusion

Residents and fellows asked for education about Good Samaritan laws and suggested that such education may increase their likelihood of helping in medical emergencies.

Recommendation Patterns among Gynaecologists and Radiologists for Adnexal Masses on Ultrasound

OBJECTIVE

Ultrasound is the primary modality used to evaluate adnexal lesions. Follow-up recommendations for ovarian cysts remain controversial between gynaecologists and radiologists. The objective of this study was to compare practice patterns for adnexal masses described on ultrasound on the basis of the interpreter's field of specialty.

METHODS

This study was conducted within the McGill University Hospital Network at two hospitals that differ in the department of interpretation of pelvic ultrasounds. In one hospital, all studies are reported by gynaecologists, and in the other, by radiologists. The study investigators collected data from pelvic ultrasounds of newly diagnosed ovarian lesions performed from May to June 2014. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to compare recommendation patterns between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 201 of 1110 pelvic ultrasound studies performed met our inclusion criteria. Gynaecologists interpreted 69 (34%) pelvic ultrasounds, and radiologists reported on 132 (66%). Reported adnexal mass types were not significantly different between the two groups. As compared with gynaecologists, radiologists were more likely to recommend MRI or CT scans (OR 11.76; 95% CI 1.17-117.78), as well as follow-up ultrasound studies (OR 4.67; 95% CI 1.66-13.1), and they were less likely to recommend no further imaging (OR 0.18; 95% CI 0.07-0.45). Groups did not differ in recommendation patterns for referral to a specialist.

CONCLUSION

There are significant differences in recommendation patterns between gynaecologists and radiologists in evaluating new adnexal masses on ultrasound. This difference can have important effects on resource use and patients' concerns.

Frequency of abnormal findings on routine chest radiography before cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative chest radiograph screening is widely used before cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of abnormal findings on a routine chest radiograph before cardiac surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 1136 patients were included. Patients were scheduled for cardiac surgery and underwent a preoperative chest radiograph. The primary outcome was the frequency of abnormalities on the chest radiograph. Secondary outcome was the effect of those abnormalities on surgery.

RESULTS

One half of the patients (570/1136; 50%) had 1 or more abnormalities on the chest radiograph. Most frequent abnormalities were cardiomegaly, aortic elongation, signs of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, vertebral fractures or height loss, possible pulmonary or mediastinal mass, pleural effusion, and atelectasis. In 2 patients (2/1136; 0.2%), the chest radiograph led to postponement of surgery, whereas in none of the patients the surgery was cancelled. In 1 patient (1/1136; 0.1%) the surgical approach was altered and in 15 patients (15/1136; 1.3%) further analysis was performed without having an impact on the planned surgical approach.

CONCLUSIONS

Although abnormalities are frequently found on preoperative chest radiographs before cardiac surgery, change in clinical management with regard to planned surgery or surgical approach occurs infrequently.

Costing in Radiology and Health Care: Rationale, Relativity, Rudiments, and Realities

Costs direct decisions that influence the effectiveness of radiology in the care of patients on a daily basis. Yet many radiologists struggle to harness the power of cost measurement and cost management as a critical path toward establishing their value in patient care. When radiologists cannot articulate their value, they risk losing control over how imaging is delivered and supported. In the United States, recent payment trends directing value-based payments for bundles of care advance the imperative for radiology providers to articulate their value. This begins with the development of an understanding of the providers' own costs, as well as the complex interrelationships and imaging-associated costs of other participants across the imaging value chain. Controlling the costs of imaging necessitates understanding them at a procedural level and quantifying the costs of delivering specific imaging services. Effective product-level costing is dependent on a bottom-up approach, which is supported through recent innovations in time-dependent activity-based costing. Once the costs are understood, they can be managed. Within the high fixed cost and high overhead cost environment of health care provider organizations, stakeholders must understand the implications of misaligned top-down cost management approaches that can both paradoxically shift effort from low-cost workers to much costlier professionals and allocate overhead costs counterproductively. Radiology's engagement across a broad spectrum of care provides an excellent opportunity for radiology providers to take a leading role within the health care organizations to enhance value and margin through principled and effective cost management. Following a discussion of the rationale for measuring costs, this review contextualizes costs from the perspectives of a variety of stakeholders (relativity), discusses core concepts in how costs are classified (rudiments), presents common and improved methods for measuring costs in health care, and discusses how cost management strategies can either improve or hinder high-value health care (realities). ^© RSNA, 2017 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

The effects of expanding outpatient and inpatient evaluation and management services in a pediatric interventional radiology practice

BACKGROUND

Despite a continuing emphasis on evaluation and management clinical services in adult interventional radiology (IR) practice, the peer-reviewed literature addressing these services - and their potential economic benefits - is lacking in pediatric IR practice.

OBJECTIVE

To measure the effects of expanding evaluation and management (E&M) services through the establishment of a dedicated pediatric interventional radiology outpatient clinic and inpatient E&M reporting system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected and analyzed E&M current procedural terminology (CPT) codes from all patients seen in a pediatric interventional radiology outpatient clinic between November 2014 and August 2015. We also calculated the number of new patients seen in the clinic who had a subsequent procedure (procedural conversion rate). For comparison, we used historical data comprising pediatric patients seen in a general interventional radiology (IR) clinic for the 2 years immediately prior. An inpatient E&M reporting system was implemented and all inpatient E&M (and subsequent procedural) services between July 2015 and September 2015 were collected and analyzed. We estimated revenue for both outpatient and inpatient services using the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule global non-facility price as a surrogate.

RESULTS

Following inception of a pediatric IR clinic, the number of new outpatients (5.5/month; +112%), procedural conversion rate (74.5%; +19%), estimated E&M revenue (+158%), and estimated procedural revenue from new outpatients (+228%) all increased. Following implementation of an inpatient clinic reporting system, there were 8.3 consults and 7.3 subsequent hospital encounters per month, with a procedural conversion rate of 88%.

CONCLUSION

Growth was observed in all meaningful metrics following expansion of outpatient and inpatient pediatric IR E&M services.

RVUs, SGR, RUC, and Alphabet Soup: Utility of an iPad App to Teach Healthcare Economics

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an iPad app for teaching healthcare economics milestones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant survey assessment of radiology residents' knowledge of healthcare economics before and following review of the Healthcare Economics iPad app was undertaken at two residencies. Residents received an electronic link to the pre survey, answered 13 general knowledge questions, rated their knowledge of healthcare economics milestones, and reported any prior economics/business background. During the conference, residents reviewed the app on their iPads. They then received a link to the post survey. Responses were entered using REDCap and a unique yet anonymous code was used to link each resident's pre and post results. A follow-up survey was completed at 3 months using REDCap.

RESULTS

Sixty-two of 69 (90%) residents completed the pre survey. Mean and median age was 30 years. Thirty-two of 62 (52%) were men and 30/62 (48%) were women. Twenty-nine percent (18/62) were postgraduate year (PGY) 2, 24% (15/62) PGY 3, 19% (12/62) PGY 4, 26% (16/62) PGY 5, and 1.6% (1/62) PGY 6. Thirty-four percent (21/62) reported some economics/business background. Residents' mean self-assessment of their knowledge of healthcare economics milestones was fair on the pre survey, significantly improved on the post survey, and plateaued at 3 months. Fifty-nine residents completed the post survey; 60 completed the 3-month follow-up. Residents demonstrated a significant increase in healthcare economics knowledge on post survey. At 3-month follow-up, significant decreases in gained knowledge were observed only in residents for whom the material was not integrated into the curriculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching with iPad apps offers an alternative, effective way to teach basics of healthcare economics milestones.

Radiology Education in the Era of Population-based Medicine in the United States

Over the past several decades, the practice of radiology has undergone substantial change primarily related to advances in imaging technology, changes in the infrastructure of healthcare delivery, and evolution of reimbursement systems. Yet to a large extent, the educational system has not substantially changed. In this perspective, we discuss the need for radiology education to adapt and address these essential systems-based skills (business, quality, informatics, leadership, population-based medicine, and interprofessional teamwork) to ensure that future radiology graduates will thrive in this evolving healthcare environment.

Economics of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound

Purpose of review

Healthcare costs have exploded in the past 30 years and they are a major concern for governments worldwide. Care management of musculoskeletal disorders and advanced imaging account for a large part of this socioeconomic burden.

Recent findings

Musculoskeletal ultrasound is now performed primarily by nonradiologists. Both musculoskeletal ultrasound and MRI total utilization rates continue to increase. Despite the existence of evidence-based diagnostic recommendations and the potential cost-savings of using musculoskeletal ultrasound instead of MRI in certain clinical situations, ensuring appropriate use of imaging among health professionals remains difficult for various reasons.

Summary

In the context of healthcare budgets restraints, use of imaging must be shown scientifically, to improve patient outcomes and be cost-effective. Current evidence recommends musculoskeletal ultrasound as the primary imaging modality in the investigation of rotator cuff disease. Policies aiming at ensuring the application of imaging guidelines among physicians are needed.