Transabdominal Ultrasound Detection of Pancreatic Cysts Incidentally Detected at CT, MRI, or Endoscopic Ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:518-525. [PMID: 29323544 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.17.18449]

Abdominal ultrasound in the characterization of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: A new tool for surveillance of low-risk patients?

BACKGROUND

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is regarded as gold-standard for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) follow-up. Given the low risk of transformation and the increasing population under surveillance, there is growing interest in identifying optimal follow-up strategies.

AIM

To evaluate reliability of abdominal ultrasound (US) for characterization of low-risk IPMN, compared to MRI.

METHODS

Prospective monocentric study among 79 consecutive patients with a suspected BD-IPMN on US. Each patient underwent confirmatory MRI. We evaluated Cohen's kappa statistic and concordance rate (CR) between MRI and US.

RESULTS

Of 79 suspected IPMNs on US, MRI confirmed 71 BD-IPMNs. There was high agreement for cyst location and number (CR and kappa of 77.5 % and 81.7 % and 0.66±0.08 and 0.62±0.11 respectively). We found high agreement for cyst size (CR=96.5 %, kappa=0.93±0.05) and main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation (CR=100 %, kappa=1). There was a good agreement for thickened septa (CR=80.3 %, kappa=0.38±0.12). US seems inferior to MRI for the identification of mural nodules < 5 mm (CR=97.2 %, kappa=0).

CONCLUSIONS

In a cohort of low-risk BD-IPMN, US presented high agreement rate with MRI regarding location, number, and size. There was a good agreement for MPD dilatation and thickened septa, while US underperform for detection of mural nodules < 5 mm.

Detection Rate of Small Pancreas Cysts and Intrareader Reliability of the Cysts Size Measurements on Transabdominal Ultrasonography

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess the detection rate of small (<10 mm) pancreas cyst and intrareader reliability for cyst size measurements on transabdominal ultrasonography (US). From 2020 to 2022, 194 pancreas cysts in 173 patients, incidentally detected on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, were evaluated on US by 1 of 2 radiologists (readers 1 and 2). Intrareader agreements of cyst size measurements on US were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Bland-Altman plot was used to visualize the differences between the first and second size measurements in each reader. In this study, readers 1 and 2 evaluated 86 cysts in 76 patients and 108 cysts in 97 patients, respectively. Most of the cysts (191 of 194) were located in the nontail portion of the pancreas. Overall detection rate of pancreas cysts by US was 92.3% (179 of 194). The mean size of measured 179 pancreas cysts was 4.7 ± 1.5 mm. The readers showed excellent intrareader agreements (ICC = 0.925 and 0.960) for cyst size measurements, except for the cysts with size ≤5 mm, where both readers showed good intrareader agreements (ICC = 0.848 and 0.873). The 95% limits of agreement of readers 1 and 2 were 13.8% and 14.9% of the mean, respectively. Therefore, transabdominal US could be a reliable follow-up imaging modality for small (<10 mm) nontail pancreas cysts incidentally detected on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, especially for the cysts with size between 5 and 10 mm. Size changes of the pancreas cysts approximately less than 15% may be within the measurement error.

Real-Time Ultrasound-Computed Tomography Fusion with Volume Navigation to Assess Pancreatic Cystic Lesions

Transabdominal ultrasound is a promising imaging modality for pancreatic cystic lesions. This study aims to determine if transabdominal ultrasonography with CT fusion (TAUS-f) using volume navigation can be used to measure pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) compared to CT alone. We evaluated 33 patients prospectively with known PCLs. The readers evaluated each PCL's size and imaging characteristics on TAUS-f and CT alone. These were compared to endoscopic ultrasonography reports. A total of 43 PCLs from 32 patients were evaluated. The detection rate by TAUS-f was 93%. Two of the three undetected PCLs were in the tail of the pancreas. Inter-reader variabilities for TAUS-f and CT were 0.005 cm and 0.03 cm, respectively. Subgroup analysis by size and location demonstrated that inter-modality variability between TAUS-f and CT was smallest for lesions < 1.5 cm with a size difference of -0.13 cm for each reader and smallest in the pancreatic head with a size difference of -0.16 cm and -0.17 cm for readers 1 and 2. We found that TAUS-f effectively evaluates PCLs compared to CT alone, thus suggesting that it should be considered part of the surveillance algorithm for a subset of patients.

Pancreatic Cystic Lesions: Imaging Techniques and Diagnostic Features

The detection of incidental pancreatic cystic lesions has increased over time. It is crucial to separate benign from potentially malignant or malignant lesions to guide management and reduce morbidity and mortality. The key imaging features used to fully characterize cystic lesions are optimally assessed by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, with pancreas protocol computed tomography offering a complementary role. While some imaging features have high specificity for a particular diagnosis, overlapping imaging features between diagnoses may require further investigation with follow-up diagnostic imaging or tissue sampling.

Incidental Findings in Pediatric Patients: How to Manage Liver Incidentaloma in Pediatric Patients

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental imaging findings-the role of ultrasound". IFs in the liver of newborns and children are rare and much less commonly encountered than in adults; as a result, they are relatively much more frequently malignant and life-threatening, even when they are of benign histology. Conventional B-mode ultrasound is the well-established first line imaging modality for the assessment of liver pathology in pediatric patients. US technological advances, resulting in image quality improvement, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), liver elastography and quantification tools for steatosis have expanded the use of ultrasound technology in daily practice. The following overview is intended to illustrate incidentally detected liver pathology covering all pediatric ages. It aims to aid the examiner in establishing the final diagnosis. Management of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) needs to take into account the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality, the patient's safety issues (including ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents), the delay in diagnosis, the psychological burden on the patient and the cost for the healthcare system. Moreover, this paper should help the pediatric clinician and ultrasound practitioner to decide which pathologies need no further investigation, which ones require interval imaging and which cases require further and immediate diagnostic procedures.

Diagnostic Yield of Transabdominal Ultrasonography for Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions Compared with Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Detection rates of pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) have increased, resulting in greater requirements for regular monitoring using imaging modalities. We aimed to evaluate the capability of ultrasonography (US) for morphological characterization of PCLs as a reference standard using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). A retrospective analysis was conducted of 102 PCLs from 92 patients who underwent US immediately prior to EUS between January 2014 and May 2017. The intermodality reliability and agreement of the PCL morphologic findings of the two techniques were analyzed and compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient and κ values. The success rates of US for delineating PCLs in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas were 77.8%, 91.8%, and 70.6%, respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for US and the corresponding EUS lesion size showed very good reliability (0.978; p < 0.001). The κ value between modalities was 0.882 for pancreatic duct dilation, indicating good agreement. The κ values for solid components and cystic wall and septal thickening were 0.481 and 0.395, respectively, indicating moderate agreement. US may be useful for monitoring PCL growth and changes in pancreatic duct dilation, but it has limited use in the diagnosis and surveillance of mural nodules or cystic wall thickness changes.

Transabdominal Ultrasound for Follow-Up of Incidentally Detected Low-Risk Pancreatic Cysts: A Prospective Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to investigate the detection rate of transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS) for pancreatic cysts incidentally detected on CT or MRI as well as the factors that influence detection rates. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Fifty-seven patients with low-risk pancreatic cysts (n = 77; cyst size, 5 mm to 3 cm) that were incidentally detected on CT or MRI were prospectively enrolled at five institutions. At each institution, TAUS was independently performed by two radiologists who assessed detection of cysts, cyst location and size, and the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD). Cyst detection rates based on cyst size, location, and multiplicity and the body mass index of the patient were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Kappa statistics and the interclass correlation coefficient were used to evaluate interobserver agreement regarding cyst detection and consistency of cyst size and the diameter of the MPD on TAUS versus prior CT or MRI. RESULTS. The detection rate for known low-risk pancreatic cysts was 81.8% (63/77) and 83.1% (64/77) for TAUS conducted by each of the two radiologists. The detection rate for larger (≥ 10 mm) cysts was significantly higher than that for smaller cysts (89.0% vs 63.6% for TAUS performed and interpreted by radiologist 1 [TAUS 1] and 89.0% vs 68.2% for TAUS conducted and interpreted by radiologist 2 [TAUS 2]; p < .05). A higher detection rate was noted for cysts located outside the tail of the pancreas compared with those located in the tail (89.5% vs 65.0% for TAUS 2; p = .01), and the detection rate was also significantly higher for single cysts than for multiple cysts (90.9% vs 69.7% for TAUS 1; p = .02). However, no significant difference was observed for body mass index. Interobserver agreement was excellent regarding the size of the detected cysts (inter-class correlation coefficient: 0.964 [95% CI, 0.940-0.979] for CT, TAUS 1, and TAUS 2 and 0.965 [95% CI. 0.924-986] for MRI, TAUS 1, and TAUS 2) and the diameter of the MPD (interclass correlation coefficient, 0.934; 95% CI, 0.898-0.959). CONCLUSION. TAUS could be a useful alternative imaging tool for surveillance of known low-risk pancreatic cysts, especially single pancreatic cysts and those that are of larger size (≥ 1 cm) or are located outside the tail.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas: recommendations for Standardized Imaging and Reporting from the Society of Abdominal Radiology IPMN disease focused panel

There have been many publications detailing imaging features of malignant transformation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN), management and recommendations for imaging follow-up of diagnosed or presumed IPMN. However, there is no consensus on several practical aspects of imaging IPMN that could serve as a clinical guide for radiologists and enable future data mining for research. These aspects include how to measure IPMN, define reporting terminology, standardize reporting and unify guidelines for surveillance. The Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) created multiple Disease-Focused Panels (DFP) comprised multidisciplinary panel members who focus on a particular disease, with the goal to develop ways for radiologists to improve patient care, education, and research. DFP members met to identify the current controversies and limitations of imaging pancreatic IPMN. This paper aims to provide a practical review of the key imaging characteristics of IPMN for trainees and practicing radiologists, to guide uniformity of performance and interpretation of surveillance imaging studies, and to improve communication with clinicians by providing a lexicon and reporting template based on the experience of the SAR-DFP panel members.

Sonographic characteristics and follow-up of pancreatic cysts

OBJECTIVES

To assess sonographic characteristics and outcome of patients with pancreatic cystic lesions seen by ultrasound.

METHODS

From our ultrasound electronic reporting database we identified all patients in which "pancreatic cyst" or "pancreatic cysts" were reported from 1995 to 2018. In patients with more than one sonogram, the first was used for our study. For each case, we recorded sonographic characteristics, maximal diameter, cyst location, and results of follow-up ultrasound, CT or magnetic resonance imaging, as well as patient sex, age, relative clinical history, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) or surgical findings when available.

RESULTS

Our study included 177 patients of whom 121 were female (68.4%). Mean age at diagnosis was 65 (±16, SD, range 22-99). Ultrasound was the initial diagnostic test in 122 (68.9%). Mean diameter of the index cyst was 13.7 mm (±11.5 mm, SD, range 2-91 mm). Among 177 index cysts, 155 were simple and 22 complex. Three complex cysts were surgically resected, yielding a primary pancreatic malignancy, a metastasis, and an epithelial-lined cyst. One simple cyst was resected, yielding a benign intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Seventeen patients underwent EUS showing six mucinous cysts and 11 nonmucinous cysts. One hundred-eighteen patients had follow-up imaging for a mean time of 5.6 years (±3.8, range 0.25-21 years). One patient was presumed to have primary pancreatic cancer. The overall rate for primary pancreatic malignancy was 1.7% (2/118).

CONCLUSIONS

Cystic pancreatic lesions seen on ultrasound are most often benign, with a low risk of pancreatic malignancy. Ultrasound is an excellent method to follow-up these cysts.

Role of transabdominal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions

Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are incidental findings that are being increasingly identified because of recent advancements in abdominal imaging technologies. PCLs include different entities, with each of them having a peculiar biological behavior, and they range from benign to premalignant or malignant neoplasms. Therefore, accurate diagnosis is important to determine the best treatment strategy. As transabdominal ultrasonography (US) is noninvasive, inexpensive, and widely available, it is considered to be the most appropriate imaging modality for the initial evaluation of abdominal diseases, including PCLs, and for follow-up assessment. We present a review of the possibilities and limits of US in the diagnosis of PCLs, the technical development of US, and the ultrasonographic characteristics of PCLs.

Factors affecting the ability of abdominal ultrasonography to detect focal pancreatic lesions identified using endoscopic ultrasonography

Purpose

This study was conducted to determine which factors influence the ability of abdominal ultrasonography (US) to detect focal pancreatic lesions identified using endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS).

Methods

In this study, 338 consecutive patients with focal pancreatic lesions (cyst, n=253; adenocarcinoma, n=54; pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, n=24; solid pseudopapillary neoplasm, n=4; intrapancreatic accessory spleen, n=1; metastasis, n=1; and lymphoma, n=1) detected by EUS who underwent US were enrolled. We reviewed their radiologic reports and assessed the presence or absence of a focal lesion, the multiplicity of the lesions, and their size and location on US. We evaluated how these parameters differed depending on whether the lesion was solid or cystic. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed.

Results

The overall detection rate of focal pancreatic lesions by US was 61.5% (208 of 338). Using US, the detection rate of cystic lesions was 58.5% (148 of 253), while that of solid lesions was 70.6% (60 of 85). In the univariate analysis, location in the neck or body, solid characteristics, and a relatively large size (15.50±10.08 mm vs. 23.09±12.93 mm) were associated with a significantly higher detection rate (P<0.001, P=0.047, and P<0.001, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, location in the neck or body (odds ratio [OR], 3.238; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.926 to 5.443; P<0.001) and size (OR, 1.070; 95% CI, 1.044 to 1.096; P<0.001) were proven to be significant predictors of detectability (P<0.001).

Conclusion

US is useful for detecting focal pancreatic lesions, especially when they are located in the neck or body and are relatively large.

White paper on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from society of abdominal radiology's disease-focused panel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Part II, update on imaging techniques and screening of pancreatic cancer in high-risk individuals

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive gastrointestinal malignancy with a poor 5-year survival rate. Its high mortality rate is attributed to its aggressive biology and frequently late presentation. While surgical resection remains the only potentially curative treatment, only 10-20% of patients will present with surgically resectable disease. Over the past several years, development of vascular bypass graft techniques and introduction of neoadjuvant treatment regimens have increased the number of patients who can undergo resection with a curative intent. While the role of conventional imaging in the detection, characterization, and staging of patients with PDAC is well established, its role in monitoring treatment response, particularly following neoadjuvant therapy remains challenging because of the complex anatomic and histological nature of PDAC. Novel morphologic and functional imaging techniques (such as DECT, DW-MRI, and PET/MRI) are being investigated to improve the diagnostic accuracy and the ability to measure response to therapy. There is also a growing interest to detect PDAC and its precursor lesions at an early stage in asymptomatic patients to increase the likelihood of achieving cure. This has led to the development of pancreatic cancer screening programs. This article will review recent updates in imaging techniques and the current status of screening and surveillance of individuals at a high risk of developing PDAC.

Single-session esophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound using a forward-viewing radial scan ultrasonic endoscope

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound is useful for obtaining high-resolution images of pancreaticobiliary diseases, but is not readily available for physical checkups. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of single-session esophagogastroduodenoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound in the detection of upper-gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary diseases using a forward-viewing radial scan ultrasonic endoscope.

METHODS

A total of 148 patients who were scheduled for upper-gastrointestinal screening using an endoscope were prospectively included. All patients were examined by EUS in combination with EGD using a forward-viewing radial scan ultrasonic endoscope. The primary endpoint was the safety of the procedures. The secondary endpoints were the prevalence of diseases, the basal imaging capability of EUS, the procedure time, total dose of propofol, and the correlation between background factors and the prevalence of pancreatic disease. The imaging capability at each region was scored as 0 (invisible) to 2 (sufficient visualization to evaluate the organs).

RESULTS

Intraoperative hypotension occurred as an adverse event of intravenous anesthesia in one patient. There were 82 pancreaticobiliary findings and 165 upper-gastrointestinal findings (malignancy not included). Follicular lymphoma of the intra-abdominal lymph nodes was detected in one patient. The mean imaging scores of each section were 1.95 (pancreatic head and papilla), 2.0 (pancreatic body), 1.99 (pancreatic tail), and 1.89 (common bile duct and gallbladder). Age, history of diabetes mellitus, and smoking history were significantly associated with the prevalence of pancreatic diseases.

CONCLUSION

The simultaneous performance of EGD and EUS using a new ultrasonic endoscope is tolerable and safe for upper-gastrointestinal and pancreaticobiliary screening.

Role of abdominal ultrasound for the surveillance follow-up of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: a cost-effective safe alternative to the routine use of magnetic resonance imaging

BACKGROUND

Patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms (PCN), without surgical indication at the time of diagnosis according to current guidelines, require lifetime image-based surveillance follow-up. In these patients, the current European evidenced-based guidelines advise magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanning every 6 mo in the first year, then annually for the next five years, without reference to any role for trans-abdominal ultrasound (US). In this study, we report on our clinical experience of a follow-up strategy of image-based surveillance with US, and restricted use of MRI every two years and for urgent evaluation whenever suspicious changes are detected by US.

AIM

To report the results and cost-efficacy of a US-based surveillance follow-up for known PCNs, with restricted use of MRI.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the records of all the patients treated in our institution with non-surgical PCN who received follow-up abdominal US and restricted MRI from the time of diagnosis, between January 2012 and January 2017. After US diagnosis and MRI confirmation, all patients underwent US surveillance every 6 mo for the first year, and then annually. A MRI scan was routinely performed every 2 years, or at any stage for all suspicious US findings. In this communication, we reported the clinical results of this alternative follow-up, and the results of a comparative cost-analysis between our surveillance protocol (abdominal US and restricted MRI) and the same patient cohort that has been followed-up in strict accordance with the European guidelines recommended for an exclusive MRI-based surveillance protocol.

RESULTS

In the 5-year period, 200 patients entered the prescribed US-restricted MRI surveillance follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 25.1 ± 18.2 mo. Surgery was required in two patients (1%) because of the appearance of suspicious features at imaging (with complete concordance between the US scan and the on-demand MRI). During the follow-up, US revealed changes in PCN appearance in 28 patients (14%). These comprised main pancreatic duct dilatation (n = 1), increased size of the main cyst (n = 14) and increased number of PNC (n = 13). In all of these patients, MRI confirmed US findings, without adding more information. The bi-annual MRI identified evolution of the lesions not identified by US in only 11 patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (5.5%), largely consisting of an increased number of very small PCN (P = 0.14). The overall mean cost of surveillance, based on a theoretical use of the European evidenced-based exclusive MRI surveillance in the same group of patients, would have been 1158.9 ± 798.6 € per patient, in contrast with a significantly lower cost of 366.4 ± 348.7 € (P < 0.0001) incurred by the US-restricted MRI surveillance used at our institution.

CONCLUSION

In patients with non-surgical PCN at the time of diagnosis, US surveillance could be a safe complementary approach to MRI, delaying and reducing the numbers of second level examinations and therefore reducing the costs.

What should be known prior to performing EUS?

Direct referral of patients for EUS - instead of preprocedural consultation with the endosonographer - has become standard practice (like for other endoscopic procedures) as it is time- and cost-effective. To ensure appropriate indications and safe examinations, the endosonographer should carefully consider what information is needed before accepting the referral. This includes important clinical data regarding relevant comorbidities, the fitness of the patient to consent and undergo the procedure, and the anticoagulation status. In addition, relevant findings from other imaging methods to clarify the clinical question may be necessary. Appropriate knowledge and management of the patients' anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy, antibiotic prophylaxis, and sedation issues can avoid unnecessary delays and unsafe procedures. Insisting on optimal preparation, appropriate indications, and clear clinical referral questions will increase the quality of the outcomes of EUS. In this paper, important practical issues regarding EUS preparations are raised and discussed from different points of view.