Voxelwise characterization of noise for a clinical photon-counting CT scanner with a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm

BACKGROUND

Photon-counting detector (PCD) technology has the potential to reduce noise in computed tomography (CT). This study aimed to carry out a voxelwise noise characterization for a clinical PCD-CT scanner with a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm (QIR).

METHODS

Forty repeated axial acquisitions (tube voltage 120 kV, tube load 200 mAs, slice thickness 0.4 mm) of a homogeneous water phantom and CTP404 module (Catphan-504) were performed. Water phantom acquisitions were also performed on a conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) scanner with a sinogram/image-based iterative reconstruction algorithm, using similar acquisition/reconstruction parameters. For smooth/sharp kernels, filtered back projection (FBP)- and iterative-reconstructed images were obtained. Noise maps, non-uniformity index (NUI) of noise maps, image noise histograms, and noise power spectrum (NPS) curves were computed.

RESULTS

For FBP-reconstructed images of water phantom, mean noise was (smooth/sharp kernel) 11.7 HU/51.1 HU and 18.3 HU/80.1 HU for PCD-scanner and EID-scanner, respectively, with NUI values for PCD-scanner less than half those for EID-scanner. Percentage noise reduction increased with increasing iterative power, up to (smooth/sharp kernel) 57.7%/72.5% and 56.3%/70.1% for PCD-scanner and EID-scanner, respectively. For PCD-scanner, FBP- and QIR-reconstructed images featured an almost Gaussian distribution of noise values, whose shape did not appreciably vary with iterative power. Noise maps of CTP404 module showed increased NUI values with increasing iterative power, up to (smooth/sharp kernel) 15.7%/9.2%. QIR-reconstructed images showed limited low-frequency shift of NPS peak frequency.

CONCLUSION

PCD-CT allowed appreciably reducing image noise while improving its spatial uniformity. QIR algorithm decreases image noise without modifying its histogram distribution shape, and partly preserving noise texture.

RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This phantom study corroborates the capability of photon-counting detector technology in appreciably reducing CT imaging noise and improving spatial uniformity of noise values, yielding a potential reduction of radiation exposure, though this needs to be assessed in more detail.

KEY POINTS

First voxelwise characterization of noise for a clinical CT scanner with photon-counting detector technology. Photon-counting detector technology has the capability to appreciably reduce CT imaging noise and improve spatial uniformity of noise values. In photon-counting CT, a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm (QIR) allows decreasing effectively image noise. This is done without modifying noise histogram distribution shape, while limiting the low-frequency shift of noise power spectrum peak frequency.

State-of-the-Art Deep Learning CT Reconstruction Algorithms in Abdominal Imaging

The implementation of deep neural networks has spurred the creation of deep learning reconstruction (DLR) CT algorithms. DLR CT techniques encompass a spectrum of deep learning-based methodologies that operate during the different steps of the image creation, prior to or after the traditional image formation process (eg, filtered backprojection [FBP] or iterative reconstruction [IR]), or alternatively by fully replacing FBP or IR techniques. DLR algorithms effectively facilitate the reduction of image noise associated with low photon counts from reduced radiation dose protocols. DLR methods have emerged as an effective solution to ameliorate limitations observed with prior CT image reconstruction algorithms, including FBP and IR algorithms, which are not able to preserve image texture and diagnostic performance at low radiation dose levels. An additional advantage of DLR algorithms is their high reconstruction speed, hence targeting the ideal triad of features for a CT image reconstruction (ie, the ability to consistently provide diagnostic-quality images and achieve radiation dose imaging levels as low as reasonably possible, with high reconstruction speed). An accumulated body of evidence supports the clinical use of DLR algorithms in abdominal imaging across multiple CT imaging tasks. The authors explore the technical aspects of DLR CT algorithms and examine various approaches to image synthesis in DLR creation. The clinical applications of DLR algorithms are highlighted across various abdominal CT imaging domains, with emphasis on the supporting evidence for diverse clinical tasks. An overview of the current limitations of and outlook for DLR algorithms for CT is provided. ©RSNA, 2024.

Multi-energy CT and iodinated contrast

Spectral CT acquires images with the emission or detection of two separate energy spectra. This enables material decomposition due to the photoelectric effect (prevalent in low-energy photons) and Compton scattering (prevalent in high-energy photons). Iodine and other materials with high atomic numbers appear more hyperdense on low-energy monoenergetic images because of the direct relation between the photoelectric effect and the Z value. Given the way iodine behaves on spectral maps, radiologists can optimise the use of contrast media in these CTs, thus allowing lower doses of radiation and lower volumes of contrast media while achieving the same CT values and even enabling lower contrast flow rates, which is especially helpful in patients with poor vascular access. Moreover, in suboptimal diagnostic cases caused by poor contrast opacification, the resolution can be improved, thus avoiding the need to repeat the study.

Effects of tube voltage, radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction strength level on the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules in ultra-low-dose chest CT

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of tube voltage, radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) strength level on the detection and characterization of pulmonary nodules by an artificial intelligence (AI) software in ultra-low-dose chest CT (ULDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anthropomorphic thorax phantom containing 12 spherical simulated nodules (Diameter: 12 mm, 10 mm, 8 mm, 5 mm; CT value: -800HU, -630HU, 100HU) was scanned with three ULDCT protocols: Dose-1 (70kVp:0.11mSv, 100kVp:0.10mSv), Dose-2 (70kVp:0.34mSv, 100kVp:0.32mSv), Dose-3 (70kVp:0.53mSv, 100kVp:0.51mSv). All scanning protocols were repeated five times. CT images were reconstructed using four different strength levels of ASiR-V (0%=FBP, 30%, 50%, 70%ASiR-V) with a slice thickness of 1.25 mm. The characteristics of the physical nodules were used as reference standards. All images were analyzed using a commercially available AI software to identify nodules for calculating nodule detection rate (DR) and to obtain their long diameter and short diameter, which were used to calculate the deformation coefficient (DC) and size measurement deviation percentage (SP) of nodules. DR, DC and SP of different imaging groups were statistically compared.

RESULTS

Image noise decreased with the increase of ASiR-V strength level, and the 70 kV images had lower noise under the same strength level (mean-value 70 kV: 40.14 ± 7.05 (dose 1), 27.55 ± 7.38 (dose 2), 23.88 ± 6.98 (dose 3); 100 kV: 42.36 ± 7.62 (dose 1); 30.78 ± 6.87 (dose 2); 26.49 ± 6.61 (dose 3)). Under the same dose level, there were no differences in DR between 70 kV and 100 kV (dose 1: 58.76% vs. 58.33%; dose 2: 73.33% vs. 70.83%; dose 3: 75.42% vs. 75.42%, all p > 0.05). The DR of GGNs increased significantly at dose 2 and higher (70 kV: 38.12% (dose 1), 60.63% (dose 2), 64.38% (dose 3); 100 kV: 37.50% (dose 1), 59.38% (dose 2), 66.25% (dose 3)). In general, the use of ASiR-V at higher strength levels (> 50%) and 100 kV provided better (lower) DC and SP.

CONCLUSION

Detection rates are similar between 70 kV and 100 kV scans. The 70 kV images have better noise performance under the same ASiR-V level, while images of 100 kV and higher ASiR-V levels are better in preserving the nodule morphology (lower DC and SP); the dose levels above 0.33mSv provide high sensitivity for nodules detection, especially the simulated ground glass nodules.

Gated cardiac CT in infants: What can we expect from deep learning image reconstruction algorithm?

BACKGROUND

ECG-gated cardiac CT is now widely used in infants with congenital heart disease (CHD). Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) could improve image quality while minimizing the radiation dose.

OBJECTIVES

To define the potential dose reduction using DLIR with an anthropomorphic phantom.

METHOD

An anthropomorphic pediatric phantom was scanned with an ECG-gated cardiac CT at four dose levels. Images were reconstructed with an iterative and a deep-learning reconstruction algorithm (ASIR-V and DLIR). Detectability of high-contrast vessels were computed using a mathematical observer. Discrimination between two vessels was assessed by measuring the CT spatial resolution. The potential dose reduction while keeping a similar level of image quality was assessed.

RESULTS

DLIR-H enhances detectability by 2.4% and discrimination performances by 20.9% in comparison with ASIR-V 50. To maintain a similar level of detection, the dose could be reduced by 64% using high-strength DLIR in comparison with ASIR-V50.

CONCLUSION

DLIR offers the potential for a substantial dose reduction while preserving image quality compared to ASIR-V.

An Intra-Individual Comparison of Low-keV Photon-Counting CT versus Energy-Integrating-Detector CT Angiography of the Aorta

This retrospective study aims to provide an intra-individual comparison of aortic CT angiographies (CTAs) using first-generation photon-counting-detector CT (PCD-CT) and third-generation energy-integrating-detector CT (EID-CT). High-pitch CTAs were performed with both scanners and equal contrast-agent protocols. EID-CT employed automatic tube voltage selection (90/100 kVp) with reference tube current of 434/350 mAs, whereas multi-energy PCD-CT scans were generated with fixed tube voltage (120 kVp), image quality level of 64, and reconstructed as 55 keV monoenergetic images. For image quality assessment, contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated, and subjective evaluation (overall quality, luminal contrast, vessel sharpness, blooming, and beam hardening) was performed independently by three radiologists. Fifty-seven patients (12 women, 45 men) were included with a median interval between examinations of 12.7 months (interquartile range 11.1 months). Using manufacturer-recommended scan protocols resulted in a substantially lower radiation dose in PCD-CT (size-specific dose estimate: 4.88 ± 0.48 versus 6.28 ± 0.50 mGy, p < 0.001), while CNR was approximately 50% higher (41.11 ± 8.68 versus 27.05 ± 6.73, p < 0.001). Overall image quality and luminal contrast were deemed superior in PCD-CT (p < 0.001). Notably, EID-CT allowed for comparable vessel sharpness (p = 0.439) and less pronounced blooming and beam hardening (p < 0.001). Inter-rater agreement was good to excellent (0.58-0.87). Concluding, aortic PCD-CTAs facilitate increased image quality with significantly lower radiation dose compared to EID-CTAs.

Implementation of AI image reconstruction in CT-how is it validated and what dose reductions can be achieved

CT reconstruction has undergone a substantial change over the last decade with the introduction of iterative reconstruction (IR) and now with deep learning reconstruction (DLR). In this review, DLR will be compared to IR and filtered back-projection (FBP) reconstructions. Comparisons will be made using image quality metrics such as noise power spectrum, contrast-dependent task-based transfer function, and non-prewhitening filter detectability index (dNPW'). Discussion on how DLR has impacted CT image quality, low-contrast detectability, and diagnostic confidence will be provided. DLR has shown the ability to improve in areas that IR is lacking, namely: noise magnitude reduction does not alter noise texture to the degree that IR did, and the noise texture found in DLR is more aligned with noise texture of an FBP reconstruction. Additionally, the dose reduction potential for DLR is shown to be greater than IR. For IR, the consensus was dose reduction should be limited to no more than 15-30% to preserve low-contrast detectability. For DLR, initial phantom and patient observer studies have shown acceptable dose reduction between 44 and 83% for both low- and high-contrast object detectability tasks. Ultimately, DLR is able to be used for CT reconstruction in place of IR, making it an easy "turnkey" upgrade for CT reconstruction. DLR for CT is actively being improved as more vendor options are being developed and current DLR options are being enhanced with second generation algorithms being released. DLR is still in its developmental early stages, but is shown to be a promising future for CT reconstruction.

Can 1.25 mm thin-section images generated with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction technique replace standard-of-care 5 mm images in abdominal CT?

BACKGROUND

CT image reconstruction has evolved from filtered back projection to hybrid- and model-based iterative reconstruction. Deep learning-based image reconstruction is a relatively new technique that uses deep convolutional neural networks to improve image quality.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate and compare 1.25 mm thin-section abdominal CT images reconstructed with deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) with 5 mm thick images reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 52 patients (31 F; 56.9±16.9 years) who underwent abdominal CT scans between August-October 2019. Image reconstruction was performed to generate 5 mm images at 40% ASIR-V and 1.25 mm DLIR images at three strengths (low [DLIR-L], medium [DLIR-M], and high [DLIR-H]). Qualitative assessment was performed to determine image noise, contrast, visibility of small structures, sharpness, and artifact based on a 5-point-scale. Image preference determination was based on a 3-point-scale. Quantitative assessment included measurement of attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR).

RESULTS

Thin-section images reconstructed with DLIR-M and DLIR-H yielded better image quality scores than 5 mm ASIR-V reconstructed images. Mean qualitative scores of DLIR-H for noise (1.77 ± 0.71), contrast (1.6 ± 0.68), small structure visibility (1.42 ± 0.66), sharpness (1.34 ± 0.55), and image preference (1.11 ± 0.34) were the best (p<0.05). DLIR-M yielded intermediate scores. All DLIR reconstructions showed superior ratings for artifacts compared to ASIR-V (p<0.05), whereas each DLIR group performed comparably (p>0.05, 0.405-0.763). In the quantitative assessment, there were no significant differences in attenuation values between all reconstructions (p>0.05). However, DLIR-H demonstrated the lowest noise (9.17 ± 3.11) and the highest CNR (CNRliver = 26.88 ± 6.54 and CNRportal vein = 7.92 ± 3.85) (all p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

DLIR allows generation of thin-section (1.25 mm) abdominal CT images, which provide improved image quality with higher inter-reader agreement compared to 5 mm thick images reconstructed with ASIR-V.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Improved image quality of thin-section CT images reconstructed with DLIR has several benefits in clinical practice, such as improved diagnostic performance without radiation dose penalties.

Evaluation of Image Quality and Detectability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in Single- and Dual-energy CT

This study is aimed to evaluate effects of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) on image quality in single-energy CT (SECT) and dual-energy CT (DECT), in reference to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). The Gammex 464 phantom was scanned in SECT and DECT modes at three dose levels (5, 10, and 20 mGy). Raw data were reconstructed using six algorithms: filtered back-projection (FBP), ASIR-V at 40% (AV-40) and 100% (AV-100) strength, and DLIR at low (DLIR-L), medium (DLIR-M), and high strength (DLIR-H), to generate SECT 120kVp images and DECT 120kVp-like images. Objective image quality metrics were computed, including noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d'). Subjective image quality evaluation, including image noise, texture, sharpness, overall quality, and low- and high-contrast detectability, was performed by six readers. DLIR-H reduced overall noise magnitudes from FBP by 55.2% in a more balanced way of low and high frequency ranges comparing to AV-40, and improved the TTF values at 50% for acrylic inserts by average percentages of 18.32%. Comparing to SECT 20 mGy AV-40 images, the DECT 10 mGy DLIR-H images showed 20.90% and 7.75% improvement in d' for the small-object high-contrast and large-object low-contrast tasks, respectively. Subjective evaluation showed higher image quality and better detectability. At 50% of the radiation dose level, DECT with DLIR-H yields a gain in objective detectability index compared to full-dose AV-40 SECT images used in daily practice.

Photon-Counting Detector CT With Quantum Iterative Reconstruction: Impact on Liver Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose Reduction

OBJECTIVES

To assess image noise, diagnostic performance, and potential for radiation dose reduction of photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) with quantum iterative reconstruction (QIR) in the detection of hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating focal liver lesions compared with energy-integrating detector (EID) CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A medium-sized anthropomorphic abdominal phantom with liver parenchyma and lesions (diameter, 5-10 mm; hypoattenuating and hyperattenuating from -30 HU to +90 HU at 120 kVp) was used. The phantom was imaged on ( a ) a third-generation dual-source EID-CT (SOMATOM Force, Siemens Healthineers) in the dual-energy mode at 100 and 150 kVp with tin filtration and ( b ) a clinical dual-source PCD-CT at 120 kVp (NAEOTOM Alpha, Siemens). Scans were repeated 10 times for each of 3 different radiation doses of 5, 2.5, and 1.25 mGy. Datasets were reconstructed as virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs) at 60 keV for both scanners and as linear-blended images (LBIs) for EID-CT. For PCD-CT, VMIs were reconstructed with different strength levels of QIR (QIR 1-4) and without QIR (QIR-off). For EID-CT, VMIs and LBIs were reconstructed using advanced modeled iterative reconstruction at a strength level of 3. Noise power spectrum was measured to compare image noise magnitude and texture. A channelized Hotelling model observer was used to assess diagnostic accuracy for lesion detection. The potential for radiation dose reduction using PCD-CT was estimated for the QIR strength level with the highest area under the curve compared with EID-CT for each radiation dose.

RESULTS

Image noise decreased with increasing QIR level at all radiation doses. Using QIR-4, noise reduction was 41%, 45%, and 59% compared with EID-CT VMIs and 12%, 18%, and 33% compared with EID-CT LBIs at 5, 2.5, and 1.25 mGy, respectively. The peak spatial frequency shifted slightly to lower frequencies at higher QIR levels. Lesion detection accuracy increased at higher QIR levels and was higher for PCD-CT compared with EID-CT VMIs. The improvement in detection with PCD-CT was strongest at the lowest radiation dose, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.917 for QIR-4 versus 0.677 for EID-CT VMIs for hyperattenuating lesions, and 0.900 for QIR-4 versus 0.726 for EID-CT VMIs for hypoattenuating lesions. Compared with EID-CT LBIs, detection was higher for QIR 1-4 at 2.5 mGy and for QIR 2-4 at 1.25 mGy (eg, 0.900 for QIR-4 compared with 0.854 for EID-CT LBIs at 1.25 mGy). Radiation dose reduction potential of PCD-CT with QIR-4 was 54% at 5 mGy compared with VMIs and 39% at 2.5 mGy compared with LBIs.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with EID-CT, PCD-CT with QIR substantially improved focal liver lesion detection, especially at low radiation dose. This enables substantial radiation dose reduction while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Iterative Reconstruction: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives

ABSTRACT

Image reconstruction processing in computed tomography (CT) has evolved tremendously since its creation, succeeding at optimizing radiation dose while maintaining adequate image quality. Computed tomography vendors have developed and implemented various technical advances, such as automatic noise reduction filters, automatic exposure control, and refined imaging reconstruction algorithms.Focusing on imaging reconstruction, filtered back-projection has represented the standard reconstruction algorithm for over 3 decades, obtaining adequate image quality at standard radiation dose exposures. To overcome filtered back-projection reconstruction flaws in low-dose CT data sets, advanced iterative reconstruction algorithms consisting of either backward projection or both backward and forward projections have been developed, with the goal to enable low-dose CT acquisitions with high image quality. Iterative reconstruction techniques play a key role in routine workflow implementation (eg, screening protocols, vascular and pediatric applications), in quantitative CT imaging applications, and in dose exposure limitation in oncologic patients.Therefore, this review aims to provide an overview of the technical principles and the main clinical application of iterative reconstruction algorithms, focusing on the strengths and weaknesses, in addition to integrating future perspectives in the new era of artificial intelligence.

Improved image quality with deep learning reconstruction - a study on a semi-anthropomorphic upper-abdomen phantom

Purpose

To assess image quality of a deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm across dose levels using a semi-anthropomorphic upper-abdominal phantom, and compare with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

Material and methods

CT scans obtained at five dose levels (CTDIvol 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mGy) were reconstructed with FBP, hybrid IR (IR50, IR70 and IR90) and DLR of low (DLL), medium (DLM) and high strength (DLH) in 0.625 mm and 2.5 mm slices. CT number, homogeneity, noise, contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), noise texture deviation (NTD; a measure of IR-specific artifacts), noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were compared between reconstruction algorithms.

Results

CT numbers were highly consistent across reconstruction algorithms. Image noise was significantly reduced with higher levels of DLR. Noise texture (NPS and NTD) was with DLR maintained at comparable levels to FBP, contrary to increasing levels of hybrid IR. Images reconstructed with DLR of low and high strength in 0.625 mm slices showed similar noise characteristics to 2.5 mm slice FBP and IR50, respectively. Dose-reduction potential based on image noise with IR50 as reference was estimated to 35% for DLM and 74% for DLH.

Conclusions

The novel DLR algorithm demonstrates robust noise reduction with maintained noise texture characteristics despite higher algorithm strength, and may have overcome important limitations of IR. There may be potential for dose reduction and additional benefit from thin-slice reconstruction.

As low as diagnostically acceptable dose imaging in maxillofacial trauma: a reference quality approach

OBJECTIVES

As-low-as-diagnostically-acceptable (ALADA) doses are substantially lower than current diagnostic reference levels. To improve dose management, a reference quality approach was tested in which phantom quality metrics of a clinical ALADA dose reference protocol were used to benchmark potential ALADA dose protocols for various scanner models.

METHODS

Spatial resolution, contrast resolution, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and subjective noise and sharpness were evaluated for a clinical ALADA dose reference protocol at 80 kV and 40 mA (CTDIvol 2.66 mGy) and compared with test protocols of two CT scanners at 100 kV and 35 mA (3.08-3.44 mGy), 80 kV and 54-61 mA (2.65 mGy), 80 kV and 40 mA (1.73-1.92 mGy), and 80 kV and 21-23 mA (1.00-1.03 mGy) using different kernels, filtered backprojection and iterative reconstructions. The test protocols with the lowest dose showing quality metrics non-inferior to the reference protocol were verified in a cadaver study by determining the diagnostic accuracy of detection of maxillofacial fractures and CNR of the optical nerve and rectus inferior muscle.

RESULTS

36 different image series were analysed in the phantom study. Based on the phantom quality metrics, potential ALADA dose protocols at 1.73-1.92 mGy were selected. Compared with the reference images, the selected protocols showed non-inferiority in the detection and classification of maxillofacial fractures and non-inferior CNR of orbital soft tissues in the cadaver study.

CONCLUSIONS

Reference quality metrics from clinical ALADA dose protocols may be used to guide selection of potential ALADA dose protocols of different CT scanners.

"Image quality evaluation of the Precise image CT deep learning reconstruction algorithm compared to Filtered Back-projection and iDose4: a phantom study at different dose levels"

PURPOSE

To characterize the performance of the Precise Image (PI) deep learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm for abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) imaging.

METHODS

CT images of the Catphan-600 phantom (equipped with an external annulus) were acquired using an abdominal protocol at four dose levels and reconstructed using FBP, iDose⁴ (levels 2,5) and PI ('Soft Tissue' definition, levels 'Sharper','Sharp','Standard','Smooth','Smoother'). Image noise, image non-uniformity, noise power spectrum (NPS), target transfer function (TTF), detectability index (d'), CT numbers accuracy and image histograms were analyzed.

RESULTS

The behavior of the PI algorithm depended strongly on the selected level of reconstruction. The phantom analysis suggested that the PI image noise decreased linearly by varying the level of reconstruction from Sharper to Smoother, expressing a noise reduction up to 80% with respect to FBP. Additionally, the non-uniformity decreased, the histograms became narrower, and d' values increased as PI reconstruction levels changed from Sharper to Smoother. PI had no significant impact on the average CT number of different contrast objects. The conventional FBP NPS was deeply altered only by Smooth and Smoother levels of reconstruction. Furthermore, spatial resolution was found to be dose- and contrast-dependent, but in each analyzed condition it was greater than or comparable to FBP and iDose⁴ TTFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The PI algorithm can reduce image noise with respect to FBP and iDose⁴; spatial resolution, CT numbers and image uniformity are generally preserved by the algorithm but changes in NPS for the Smooth and Smoother levels need to be considered in protocols implementation.

Quality Assessment of Computed Tomography Images using a Channelized Hoteling Observer: Optimization of Protocols in Clinical Practice

Background

This study investigated the feasibility of channelized hoteling observer (CHO) model in computed tomography (CT) protocol optimization regarding the image quality and patient exposure. While the utility of using model observers such as to optimize the clinical protocol is evident, the pitfalls associated with the use of this method in practice require investigation.

Materials and Methods

This study was performed using variable tube current and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) level (ASIR 10% to ASIR 100%). Various criteria including noise, high-contrast spatial resolution, CHOs model were used to compare image quality at different captured levels. For the implementation of CHO, we first tuned the model in a restricted dataset and then it to the evaluation of a large dataset of images obtained with different reconstruction ASIR and filtered back projection (FBP) levels.

Results

The results were promising in terms of CHO use for the stated purposes. Comparisons of the noise of reconstructed images with 30% ASIR and higher levels of noise in rebuilding images using the FBP approach showed a significant difference (P < 0.05). The spatial resolution obtained using various ASIR levels and tube currents were 0.8 pairs of lines per millimeter, which did not differ significantly from the FBP method (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

Based on the results, using 80% ASIR can reduce the radiation dose on lungs, abdomen, and pelvis CT scans while maintaining image quality. Furthermore using ASIR 60% only for the reconstruction of lungs, abdomen, and pelvis images at standard radiation dose leads to optimal image quality.

Deep learning image reconstruction in pediatric abdominal and chest computed tomography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose

BACKGROUND

Studies on the application of deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) in pediatric computed tomography (CT) are limited and have so far been mostly based on phantom. The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality and radiation dose of DLIR with that of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-Veo (ASiR-V) during abdominal and chest CT for the pediatric population.

METHODS

A pediatric phantom was used for the pilot study, and 20 children were recruited for clinical verification. The preset scan parameter noise index (NI) was 5, 8, 11, 13, 15, and 18 for the phantom study, and 8 and 13 for the clinical pediatric study. We reconstructed CT images with ASiR-V 30%, ASiR-V 70%, DLIR-M (medium) and DLIR-H (high). The regions of interest (ROI) were marked on the organs of the abdomen (liver, kidney, and subcutaneous fat) and the chest (lung, mediastinum, and spine). The CT dose index volume (CTDIvol), CT value, image noise (N), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured and calculated. The subjective image quality was assessed by 3 radiologists blindly using a 5-point scale. The dose reduction efficiency of DLIR was estimated.

RESULTS

In the phantom study, the interobserver assessment of the data measurement demonstrated good agreement [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =0.814 for abdomen, 0.801 for chest]. Within the same dose level, the N, SNR, and CNR were statistically different among reconstructions, while the CT value remained the same. The N increased and SNR decreased as the radiation dose decreased. The DLIR-H performed better than ASiR-V when the radiation dose was reduced, without sacrificing image quality. In the patient study, the interobserver assessment of the data measurement demonstrated good agreement (ICC =0.774 for abdomen, 0.751 for chest). DLIR-H had the highest subjective and objective scores in the abdomen.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of DLIR could help to reduce radiation dose without sacrificing the image quality of pediatric CT scans. Further clinical validation is required.

Optimization of a customized simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique algorithm for phase-contrast breast computed tomography

Objective. To introduce the optimization of a customized GPU-based simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (cSART) in the field of phase-contrast breast computed tomography (bCT). The presented algorithm features a 3D bilateral regularization filter that can be tuned to yield optimal performance for clinical image visualization and tissues segmentation. Approach. Acquisitions of a dedicated test object and a breast specimen were performed at Elettra, the Italian synchrotron radiation (SR) facility (Trieste, Italy) using a large area CdTe single-photon counting detector. Tomographic images were obtained at 5 mGy of mean glandular dose, with a 32 keV monochromatic x-ray beam in the free-space propagation mode. Three independent algorithms parameters were optimized by using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution, and noise texture metrics. The results obtained with the cSART algorithm were compared with conventional SART and filtered back projection (FBP) reconstructions. Image segmentation was performed both with gray scale-based and supervised machine-learning approaches. Main results. Compared to conventional FBP reconstructions, results indicate that the proposed algorithm can yield images with a higher CNR (by 35% or more), retaining a high spatial resolution while preserving their textural properties. Alternatively, at the cost of an increased image ‘patchiness’, the cSART can be tuned to achieve a high-quality tissue segmentation, suggesting the possibility of performing an accurate glandularity estimation potentially of use in the realization of realistic 3D breast models starting from low radiation dose images. Significance. The study indicates that dedicated iterative reconstruction techniques could provide significant advantages in phase-contrast bCT imaging. The proposed algorithm offers great flexibility in terms of image reconstruction optimization, either toward diagnostic evaluation or image segmentation.

Application of deep learning image reconstruction in low-dose chest CT scan

OBJECTIVE

Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) is a new reconstruction method for maintaining image quality at reduced radiation dose. The purpose of this study was to compare image quality of reduced-dose DLIR images with the standard-dose adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) images in chest CT.

METHODS

Our prospective study included 48 adult patients (30 women and 18 men, mean age ±SD, 49.8 ± 14.3 years) who underwent both the standard-dose CT (SDCT) and low-dose CT (LDCT) on a GE Revolution CT scanner. All patients gave written informed consent. All scans were reconstructed with ASIR-V40%. Additionally, LDCT scans were reconstructed with DLIR with high-setting (DLIR-H) and medium-setting (DLIR-M). Image noise and contrast-noise-ratio (CNR) of thoracic aorta with different reconstruction modes were measured and compared.

RESULTS

LDCT reduced radiation dose by 96% compared with SDCT (CTDIvol: 0.54mGy vs 12.46mGy). In LDCT, DLIR significantly reduced image noise compared with the state-of-the-art ASIR-V40% with DLIR-H provided the lowest image noise and highest image quality score. In addition, the image noise, CNR of aorta and overall image quality of the low-dose DLIR-H images did not have significant difference compared with the SDCT ASIR-V40% images (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

DLIR significantly reduces image noise in LDCT chest scans and provides similar image quality as the SDCT ASIR-V images at 4% of the radiation dose.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

DLIR uses high-quality FBP data to train deep neural networks to learn how to distinguish between signal and noise, and effectively suppresses noise without affecting anatomical and pathological structures. It opens a new era of CT image reconstruction. DLIR significantly reduces image noise and improves image quality compared with ASIR-V40% under same radiation dose condition. DLIR-H achieves similar image quality at 4% radiation dose as ASIR-V40% at standard-dose level in non-contrast chest CT.

Virtual monoenergetic images from dual-energy CT: systematic assessment of task-based image quality performance

Background

To compare task-based image quality (TB-IQ) among virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) and linear-blended images (LBI) from dual-energy CT as a function of contrast task, radiation dose, size, and lesion diameter.

Methods

A TB-IQ phantom (Mercury Phantom 4.0, Sun Nuclear Corporation) was imaged on a third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT with 100/Sn150 kVp at three volume CT dose levels (5, 10, 15 mGy). Three size sections (diameters 16, 26, 36 cm) with subsections for image noise and spatial resolution analysis were used. High-contrast tasks (e.g., calcium-containing stone and vascular lesion) were emulated using bone and iodine inserts. A low-contrast task (e.g., low-contrast lesion or hematoma) was emulated using a polystyrene insert. VMI at 40-190 keV and LBI were reconstructed. Noise power spectrum (NPS) determined the noise magnitude and texture. Spatial resolution was assessed using the task-transfer function (TTF) of the three inserts. The detectability index (d') served as TB-IQ metric.

Results

Noise magnitude increased with increasing phantom size, decreasing dose, and decreasing VMI-energy. Overall, noise magnitude was higher for VMI at 40-60 keV compared to LBI (range of noise increase, 3-124%). Blotchier noise texture was found for low and high VMIs (40-60 keV, 130-190 keV) compared to LBI. No difference in spatial resolution was observed for high contrast tasks. d' increased with increasing dose level or lesion diameter and decreasing size. For high-contrast tasks, d' was higher at 40-80 keV and lower at high VMIs. For the low-contrast task, d' was higher for VMI at 70-90 keV and lower at 40-60 keV.

Conclusions

Task-based image quality differed among VMI-energy and LBI dependent on the contrast task, dose level, phantom size, and lesion diameter. Image quality could be optimized by tailoring VMI-energy to the contrast task. Considering the clinical relevance of iodine, VMIs at 50-60 keV could be proposed as an alternative to LBI.

Comparison of two different GSI scanning protocols in head and neck CT angiography: Image quality and radiation dose

OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality and radiation dose of computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the head and neck in patients using two Gemstone Spectral Imaging (GSI) scanning protocols.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients who underwent head-neck CTA were divided into two groups (A and B) according to the scanning protocols, with 50 patients in each group. The patients in group A underwent GSI scanning protocol 1 (GSI profile: head and neck CTA), while those in group B underwent GSI scanning protocol 2 (GSI profile: chest 80 mm). All images were reconstructed using 40% and 70% pre- and post-adaptive level statistical iterative reconstruction V (pre-ASiR-V and post-ASiR-V) algorithms, respectively. The CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length (DLP) product were recorded and the mean value was calculated and converted to the effective dose. CT values, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of all images were calculated. Additionally, subjective image evaluation was conducted by two independent radiologists using a five-point scoring method. All data were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the CT values, SNR, CNR, and subjective score between groups A and B (p > 0.05); however, the mean effective dose (1.2±0.1 mSv) in group B was 45.5% lower than that in group A (2.2±0.2 mSv) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

GSI scanning protocol 2 could more effectively reduce the radiation dose in head-neck CT angiography while maintaining image quality compared to GSI scanning protocol 1.

Low-contrast detectability and potential for radiation dose reduction using deep learning image reconstruction—A 20-reader study on a semi-anthropomorphic liver phantom

Background

A novel deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm for CT has recently been clinically approved.

Purpose

To assess low-contrast detectability and dose reduction potential for CT images reconstructed with the DLIR algorithm and compare with filtered back projection (FBP) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR).

Material and methods

A customized upper-abdomen phantom containing four cylindrical liver inserts with low-contrast lesions was scanned at CT dose indexes of 5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 mGy. Images were reconstructed with FBP, 50% hybrid IR (IR50), and DLIR of low strength (DLL), medium strength (DLM) and high strength (DLH). Detectability was assessed by 20 independent readers using a two-alternative forced choice approach. Dose reduction potential was estimated separately for each strength of DLIR using a fitted model, with the detectability performance of FBP and IR50 as reference.

Results

For the investigated dose levels of 5 and 10 mGy, DLM improved detectability compared to FBP by 5.8 and 6.9 percentage points (p.p.), and DLH improved detectability by 9.6 and 12.3 p.p., respectively (all p < .007). With IR50 as reference, DLH improved detectability by 5.2 and 9.8 p.p. for the 5 and 10 mGy dose level, respectively (p < .03). With respect to this low-contrast detectability task, average dose reduction potential relative to FBP was estimated to 39% for DLM and 55% for DLH. Relative to IR50, average dose reduction potential was estimated to 21% for DLM and 42% for DLH.

Conclusions:

Low-contrast detectability performance is improved when applying a DLIR algorithm, with potential for radiation dose reduction.

•

Deep learning image reconstruction improves low-contrast detectability in CT.

•

Performance improved with increasing strength of deep learning image reconstruction.

•

Results suggest potential for CT radiation dose reduction.

Full field-of-view, high-resolution, photon-counting detector CT: technical assessment and initial patient experience

We report a comprehensive evaluation of a full field-of-view (FOV) photon-counting detector (PCD) computed tomography (CT) system using phantoms, and qualitatively assess image quality in patient examples. A whole-body PCD-CT system with 50 cm FOV, 5.76 cm z-detector coverage and two acquisition modes (standard: 144 × 0.4 mm collimation and ultra-high resolution (UHR): 120 × 0.2 mm collimation) was used in this study. Phantoms were scanned to assess image uniformity, CT number accuracy, noise power spectrum, spatial resolution, material decomposition and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) performance. Four patients were scanned on the PCD-CT system with matched or lower radiation dose than their prior clinical CT scans performed using energy-integrating detector (EID) CT, and the potential clinical impact of PCD-CT was qualitatively evaluated. Phantom results showed water CT numbers within ±5 HU, and image uniformity measured between peripheral and central regions-of-interests to be within ±5 HU. For the UHR mode using a dedicated sharp kernel, the cut-off spatial frequency was 40 line-pairs cm-1, which corresponds to a 125μm limiting in-plane spatial resolution. The full-width-at-half-maximum for the section sensitivity profile was 0.33 mm for the smallest slice thickness (0.2 mm) using the UHR mode. Material decomposition in a multi-energy CT phantom showed accurate material classification, with a root-mean-squared-error of 0.3 mg cc-1for iodine concentrations (2-15 mg cc-1) and 14.2 mg cc-1for hydroxyapatite concentrations (200 and 400 mg cc-1). The average percent error for CT numbers corresponding to the iodine concentrations in VMI (40-70 keV) was 2.75%. Patient PCD-CT images demonstrated better delineation of anatomy for chest and temporal bone exams performed with the UHR mode, which allowed the use of very sharp kernels not possible with EID-CT. VMI and virtual non-contrast images generated from a patient head CT angiography exam using the standard acquisition mode demonstrated the multi-energy capability of the PCD-CT system.

Retrospective study of deep learning to reduce noise in non-contrast head CT images

PURPOSE

Presented herein is a novel CT denoising method uses a skip residual encoder-decoder framework with group convolutions and a novel loss function to improve the subjective and objective image quality for improved disease detection in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, confirmed AIS patients with full-dose NCCT head scans were randomly selected from a stroke registry between 2016 and 2020. 325 patients (67 ± 15 years, 176 men) were included. 18 patients each with 4-7 NCCTs performed within 5-day timeframe (83 total scans) were used for model training; 307 patients each with 1-4 NCCTs performed within 5-day timeframe (380 total scans) were used for hold-out testing. In the training group, a mean CT was created from the patient's co-registered scans for each input CT to train a rotation-reflection equivariant U-Net with skip and residual connections, as well as a group convolutional neural network (SRED-GCNN) using a custom loss function to remove image noise. Denoising performance was compared to the standard Block-matching and 3D filtering (BM3D) method and RED-CNN quantitatively and visually. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) were measured in manually drawn regions-of-interest in grey matter (GM), white matter (WM) and deep grey matter (DG). Visual comparison and impact on spatial resolution were assessed through phantom images.

RESULTS

SRED-GCNN reduced the original CT image noise significantly better than BM3D, with SNR improvements in GM, WM, and DG by 2.47x, 2.83x, and 2.64x respectively and CNR improvements in DG/WM and GM/WM by 2.30x and 2.16x respectively. Compared to the proposed SRED-GCNN, RED-CNN reduces noise effectively though the results are visibly blurred. Scans denoised by the SRED-GCNN are shown to be visually clearer with preserved anatomy.

CONCLUSION

The proposed SRED-GCNN model significantly reduces image noise and improves signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios in 380 unseen head NCCT cases.

PULMONARY NODULE DETECTION IN CHEST CT USING A DEEP LEARNING-BASED RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM

This study's aim was to assess whether deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) techniques are non-inferior to ASIR-V for the clinical task of pulmonary nodule detection in chest computed tomography. Up to 6 (range 3-6, mean 4.2) artificial lung nodules (diameter: 3, 5, 8 mm; density: -800, -630, +100 HU) were inserted at different locations in the Kyoto Kagaku Lungman phantom. In total, 16 configurations (10 abnormal, 6 normal) were scanned at 7.6, 3, 1.6 and 0.38 mGy CTDIvol (respectively 0, 60, 80 and 95% dose reduction). Images were reconstructed using 50% ASIR-V and a deep learning-based algorithm with low (DL-L), medium (DL-M) and high (DL-H) strength. Four chest radiologists evaluated 256 series by locating and scoring nodules on a five-point scale. No statistically significant difference was found among the reconstruction algorithms (p = 0.987, average across readers AUC: 0.555, 0.561, 0.557, 0.558 for ASIR-V, DL-L, DL-M, DL-H).

Image quality assessment of pediatric chest and abdomen CT by deep learning reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Efforts to reduce the radiation dose have continued steadily, with new reconstruction techniques. Recently, image denoising algorithms using artificial neural networks, termed deep learning reconstruction (DLR), have been applied to CT image reconstruction to overcome the drawbacks of iterative reconstruction (IR). The purpose of our study was to compare the objective and subjective image quality of DLR and IR on pediatric abdomen and chest CT images.

METHODS

This retrospective study included pediatric body CT images from February 2020 to October 2020, performed on 51 patients (34 boys and 17 girls; age 1-18 years). Non-contrast chest CT (n = 16), contrast-enhanced chest CT (n = 12), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (n = 23) images were included. Standard 50% adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASIR-V) images were compared to images with 100% ASIR-V and DLR at medium and high strengths. Attenuation, noise, contrast to noise ratio (CNR), and signal to noise (SNR) measurements were performed. Overall image quality, artifacts, and noise were subjectively assessed by two radiologists using a four-point scale (superior, average, suboptimal, and unacceptable). A phantom scan was performed including the dose range of the clinical images used in our study, and the noise power spectrum (NPS) was calculated. Quantitative and qualitative parameters were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni correction and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

DLR had better CNR and SNR than 50% ASIR-V in both pediatric chest and abdomen CT images. When compared with 50% ASIR-V, high strength DLR was associated with noise reduction in non-contrast chest CT (33.0%), contrast-enhanced chest CT (39.6%), and contrast-enhanced abdomen CT (38.7%) with increases in CNR at 149.1%, 105.8%, and 53.1% respectively. The subjective assessment of overall image quality and the noise was also better on DLR images (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in artifacts between reconstruction methods. From NPS analysis, DLR methods showed a pattern of reducing the magnitude of noise while maintaining the texture.

CONCLUSION

Compared with 50% ASIR-V, DLR improved pediatric body CT images with significant noise reduction. However, artifacts were not improved by DLR, regardless of strength.

The potential of iodinated contrast reduction in dual-energy CT thoracic angiography; an evaluation of image quality

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to compare a dual energy CT (DECT) protocol with 50% reduction of iodinated contrast to a single energy CT (SECT) protocol using standard contrast dose in imaging of the thoracic aorta.

METHODS

DECT with a 50% reduction in iodinated contrast was compared with SECT. For DECT, monoenergetic images at 50, 55, 60, 65, 68, 70, and 74 keV were reconstructed with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V) of 50% and 80%. Objective image quality parameters included intravascular attenuation (HU), image noise (SD), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Two independent radiologists subjectively assessed the image quality for the 55 and 68 keV DECT reconstructions and SECT on a five-point Likert scale.

RESULTS

Across 14 patients, the intravascular attenuation at 50-55 keV was comparable to SECT (p > 0.05). The CNRs were significantly lower for DECT with ASIR-V 50% compared to SECT for all keV-values (p < 0.05 for all). For ASIR-V 80%, CNR was comparable to SECT at energies below 60 keV (p > 0.05). The subjective image quality was comparable between DECT and SECT independent of keV level.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that a 50% reduction in iodinated contrast may result in adequate image quality using DECT with monoenergetic reconstructions at lower energy levels for the imaging of the thoracic aorta. The best image quality was obtained for ASiR-V 80% image reconstructions at 55 keV.

IMPLICATIONS OF PRACTICE

Dual energy CT with a reduction in iodinated contrast may result in adequate image quality in imaging of the thoracic aorta. However, increased radiation dose may limit the use to patients in which a reduction in fluid and iodinated contrast volume may outweigh this risk.

Impact of iterative reconstruction algorithms on the applicability of Fourier-based detectability index for x-ray CT imaging

PURPOSE

The increasing application of iterative reconstruction algorithms in clinical computed tomography to improve image quality and reduce radiation dose, elicits strong interest, and needs model observers to optimize CT scanning protocols objectively and efficiently. The current paradigm for evaluating imaging system performance relies on Fourier methods, which presuppose a linear, wide-sense stationary system. Long-range correlations introduced by iterative reconstruction algorithms may narrow the applicability of Fourier techniques. Differences in the implementation of reconstruction algorithms between manufacturers add further complexity. The present work set out to quantify the errors entailed by the use of Fourier methods, which can lead to design decisions that do not correlate with detectability.

METHODS

To address this question, we evaluated the noise properties and the detectability index of the ideal linear observer using the spatial approach and the Fourier-based approach. For this purpose, a homogeneous phantom was imaged on two scanners: the Revolution CT (GE Healthcare) and the Somatom Definition AS+ (Siemens Healthcare) at different exposure levels. Images were reconstructed using different strength levels of IR algorithms available on the systems considered: Adaptative Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (ASIR-V) and Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction (SAFIRE).

RESULTS

Our findings highlight that the spatial domain estimate of the detectability index is higher than the Fourier domain estimate. This trend is found to be dependent on the specific regularization used by IR algorithms as well as the signal to be detected. The eigenanalysis of the noise covariance matrix and of its circulant approximation yields explanation about the evoked trends. In particular, this analysis suggests that the predictive power of the Fourier-based ideal linear observer depends on the ability of each basis analyzed to be relevant to the signal to be detected.

CONCLUSION

The applicability of Fourier techniques is dependent on the specific regularization used by IR algorithms. These results argue for verifying the assumptions made when using Fourier methods since Fourier-task-based detectability index does not always correlate with signal detectability.

Effect of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V) levels on ultra-low-dose CT radiomics quantification in pulmonary nodules

Background

The weightings of iterative reconstruction algorithm can affect CT radiomic quantification. But, the effect of ASiR-V levels on the reproducibility of CT radiomic features between ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) and low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is still unknown. The purpose of study is to investigate whether adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASiR-V) levels affect radiomic feature quantification using ULDCT and to assess the reproducibility of radiomic features between ULDCT and LDCT.

Methods

Sixty-three patients with pulmonary nodules underwent LDCT (0.70±0.16 mSv) and ULDCT (0.15±0.02 mSv). LDCT was reconstructed with ASiR-V 50%, and ULDCT with ASiR-V 50%, 70%, and 90%. Radiomics analysis was applied, and 107 features were extracted. The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated to describe agreement among ULDCTs and between ULDCT and LDCT for each feature. The proportion of features with CCC >0.9 among ULDCTs and between ULDCT and LDCT, and the mean CCC for all features between ULDCT and LDCT were also compared.

Results

Sixty-three solid nodules (SNs) and 48 pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) were analyzed. There was no difference for the proportion of features in SNs among ULDCTs and between ULDCT and LDCT (P>0.05). The proportion of features in pGGNs were highest for ULDCT_{70% vs. 90%} (78.5%) and ULDCT_90% vs. LDCT_50% (50.5%). In SNs, the mean CCC for ULDCT_90% vs. LDCT_50% was 0.67±0.26, not different with that for ULDCT_50% vs. LDCT_50% (0.68±0.24) and ULDCT_70% vs. LDCT_50% (0.64±0.21) (P>0.05). In pGGNs, the mean CCC for ULDCT_90% vs. LDCT_50% was 0.79±0.19, higher than that for ULDCT_50% vs. LDCT_50% (0.61±0.28) and ULDCT_70% vs. LDCT_50% (0.76±0.24) (P<0.05).

Conclusions

ASiR-V levels significantly affected ULDCT radiomic feature quantification in pulmonary nodules, with stronger effects in pGGNs than in SNs. The reproducibility of radiomic features was highest between ULDCT_90% and LDCT_50%.

Influence of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions on CT Radiomic Features in Oncologic Patients

Iterative reconstructions (IR) might alter radiomic features extraction. We aim to evaluate the influence of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) on CT radiomic features. Patients who underwent unenhanced abdominal CT (Revolution Evo, GE Healthcare, USA) were retrospectively enrolled. Raw data of filtered-back projection (FBP) were reconstructed with 10 levels of ASIR-V (10–100%). CT texture analysis (CTTA) of liver, kidney, spleen and paravertebral muscle for all datasets was performed. Six radiomic features (mean intensity, standard deviation (SD), entropy, mean of positive pixel (MPP), skewness, kurtosis) were extracted and compared between FBP and all ASIR-V levels, with and without altering the spatial scale filter (SSF). CTTA of all organs revealed significant differences between FBP and all ASIR-V reconstructions for mean intensity, SD, entropy and MPP (all p < 0.0001), while no significant differences were observed for skewness and kurtosis between FBP and all ASIR-V reconstructions (all p > 0.05). A per-filter analysis was also performed comparing FBP with all ASIR-V reconstructions for all six SSF separately (SSF0-SSF6). Results showed significant differences between FBP and all ASIR-V reconstruction levels for mean intensity, SD, and MPP (all filters p < 0.0315). Skewness and kurtosis showed no differences for all comparisons performed (all p > 0.05). The application of incremental ASIR-V levels affects CTTA across various filters. Skewness and kurtosis are not affected by IR and may be reliable quantitative parameters for radiomic analysis.

Low-dose dual-energy CT for stone characterization: a systematic comparison of two generations of split-filter single-source and dual-source dual-energy CT

PURPOSE

To compare noise texture and accuracy to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid urinary stones among four different single-source and dual-source DECT approaches in an ex vivo phantom study.

METHODS

Thirty-two urinary stones embedded in gelatin were mounted on a Styrofoam disk and placed into a water-filled phantom. The phantom was imaged using four different DECT approaches: (A) dual-source DECT (DS-DE); (B) 1st generation split-filter single-source DECT (SF1-TB); (C) 2nd generation split-filter single-source DECT (SF2-TB) and (D) 2nd generation split-filter single-source DECT using serial acquisitions (SF2-TS). Two different radiation doses (3 mGy and 6 mGy) were used. Noise texture was compared by assessing the average spatial frequency (f_av) of the normalized noise power spectrum (nNPS). ROC curves for stone classification were computed and the accuracy for different dual-energy ratio cutoffs was derived.

RESULTS

NNPS demonstrated comparable noise texture among A, C, and D (f_av-range 0.18-0.19) but finer noise texture for B (f_av = 0.27). Stone classification showed an accuracy of 96.9%, 96.9%, 93.8%, 93.8% for A, B, C, D for low-dose, respectively, and 100%, 96.9%, 96.9%, 100% for routine dose. The vendor-specified cutoff for the dual-energy ratio was optimal except for the low-dose scan in D for which the accuracy was improved from 93.8 to 100% using an optimized cutoff.

CONCLUSION

Accuracy to differentiate uric acid from non-uric acid stones was high among four single-source and dual-source DECT approaches for low- and routine dose DECT scans. Noise texture differed only slightly for the first-generation split-filter approach.

Protocol Optimization Considerations for Implementing Deep Learning CT Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE. Previous advances over filtered back projection (FBP) have incorporated model-based iterative reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to characterize the latest advance in image reconstruction, that is, deep learning. The focus was on applying characterization results of a deep learning approach to decisions about clinical CT protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A proprietary deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) method was characterized against an existing advanced adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction method (ASIR-V) and FBP from the same vendor. The metrics used were contrast-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution as a function of contrast level, noise texture (i.e., noise power spectra [NPS]), noise scaling as a function of slice thickness, and CT number consistency. The American College of Radiology accreditation phantom and a uniform water phantom were used at a range of doses and slice thicknesses for both axial and helical acquisition modes. RESULTS. ASIR-V and DLIR were associated with improved contrast-to-noise ratio over FBP for all doses and slice thicknesses. No dose or contrast dependencies of spatial resolution were observed for ASIR-V or DLIR. NPS results showed DLIR maintained an FBP-like noise texture whereas ASIR-V shifted the NPS to lower frequencies. Noise changed with dose and slice thickness in the same manner for ASIR-V and FBP. DLIR slice thickness noise scaling differed from FBP, exhibiting less noise penalty with decreasing slice thickness. No clinically significant changes were observed in CT numbers for any measurement condition. CONCLUSION. In a phantom model, DLIR does not suffer from the concerns over reduction in spatial resolution and introduction of poor noise texture associated with previous methods.

A Third-Generation Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction for Contrast-Enhanced 4-Dimensional Dual-Energy Computed Tomography for Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to assess the objective and subjective qualities of the contrast-enhanced 4-dimensional dual-energy computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR) and ASiR-V.

METHODS

The virtual monochromatic images at 60 keV were reconstructed using filtered back projection, ASiR, and ASiR-V (10%-100%) for 14 patients with pancreatic cancer. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was calculated, and the subjective measurements were compared based on a 5-point score scale.

RESULTS

The ASiR-V yielded a significantly higher CNR than ASiR (P < 0.05). The subjective image quality (peak) was significantly improved (P < 0.01) with ASiR (50%) (3.8, 3.5, and 4.0; overall image quality, tumor delineation, and noise, respectively) and with ASiR-V (50%) (3.9, 3.5, and 4.2, respectively) compared with the filtered back projection (3.2, 3.2, and 3.0, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The ASiR-V yielded higher CNR than ASiR and provided the highest subjective scores regarding the overall image quality.

Preserving image texture while reducing radiation dose with a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm in chest CT: A phantom study

PURPOSE

To assess whether a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm (TrueFidelity) can preserve the image texture of conventional filtered back projection (FBP) at reduced dose levels attained by ASIR-V in chest CT.

METHODS

Phantom images were acquired using a clinical chest protocol (7.6 mGy) and two levels of dose reduction (60% and 80%). Images were reconstructed with FBP, ASIR-V (50% and 100% blending) and TrueFidelity (low (DL-L), medium (DL-M) and high (DL-H) strength). Noise (SD), noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were calculated. Noise texture was quantitatively compared by computing root-mean-square deviations (RMSD) of NPS with respect to FBP. Four experienced readers performed a contrast-detail evaluation. The dose reducing potential of TrueFidelity compared to ASIR-V was assessed by fitting SD and contrast-detail as a function of dose.

RESULTS

DL-M and DL-H reduced noise and NPS area compared to FBP and 50% ASIR-V, at all dose levels. At 7.6 mGy, NPS of ASIR-V 50/100% was shifted towards lower frequencies (f_peak = 0.22/0.13 mm^-1, RMSD = 0.14/0.38), with respect to FBP (f_peak = 0.30 mm^-1). Marginal difference was observed for TrueFidelity: f_peak = 0.33/0.30/0.30 mm^-1 and RMSD = 0.03/0.04/0.07 for L/M/H strength. Values of TTF_50% were independent of DL strength and higher compared to FBP and ASIR-V, at all dose and contrast levels. Contrast-detail was highest for DL-H at all doses. Compared to 50% ASIR-V, DL-H had an estimated dose reducing potential of 50% on average, without impairing noise, texture and detectability.

CONCLUSIONS

TrueFidelity preserves the image texture of FBP, while outperforming ASIR-V in terms of noise, spatial resolution and detectability at lower doses.

Ultra-low-dose CT reconstructed with ASiR-V using SmartmA for pulmonary nodule detection and Lung-RADS classifications compared with low-dose CT

AIM

To evaluate the accuracy of ultra-low-dose computed tomography (ULDCT) with ASiR-V using a noise index (SmartmA) for pulmonary nodule detection and Lung CT Screening Reporting And Data System (Lung-RADS) classifications compared with low-dose CT (LDCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two-hundred and ten patients referred for lung cancer screening underwent conventional chest LDCT (0.80 ± 0.28 mSv) followed immediately by ULDCT (0.16 ± 0.03 mSv). ULDCT was scanned using 120 kV/SmartmA with a noise index of 28 HU and reconstructed with ASiR-V70%. The types and diameters of all nodules were recorded. The attenuation of pure ground-glass nodules (pGGNs) was measured on LDCT. All nodules were further classified using Lung-RADS. Sensitivities of nodule detection on ULDCT were analysed using LDCT as the reference standard. Logistic regression was used to establish a prediction model for the sensitivity of nodules.

RESULTS

LDCT revealed 362 nodules and the overall sensitivity on ULDCT was 90.1%. The sensitivity for solid nodules (SNs) of ≥1 mm diameter was 96.6% (228/236) and 100% (26/26) for SNs of ≥6 mm diameter. For pGGNs of ≥6 mm, the overall sensitivity was 93% (40/43) and 100% (29/29) for nodules with a attenuation value -700 HU or more. The agreement of Lung-RADS classification between two scans was good. On logistic regression, diameter was the only independent predictor for sensitivity of SNs (p<0.05). Diameter and attenuation value were predictors for pGGNs (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

ULDCT with ASiR-V using SmartmA is suitable for lung-cancer screening in people with a BMI ≤35 kg/m² as it has a low radiation dose of 0.16 mSv, high sensitivity for nodule detection and good performance of Lung-RADS classifications.

Value of using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) technology in pediatric head CT dose reduction

Background

With widespread use of pediatric head CT, it is critically important to protect patients from radiation hazards, using reduced dose CT techniques. In this regard, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) algorithm can decrease image noise, generating CT images of reasonable diagnostic quality with less radiation. The objective of this study was radiation dose assessment, quantitative and qualitative evaluation of reduced dose pediatric head CT using ASIR-V 60% and 80% reconstruction.

Results

Retrospective analysis was performed on two groups of pediatric head CT examinations, a reduced dose CT examination group with ASIR-V reconstruction (ASIR group) (n = 27) and a standard dose CT examination group without ASIR reconstruction (non-ASIR group) (n = 14). The average effective dose (ED) of ASIR group was significantly lower than that of the non-ASIR group (1.04 ± 0.1 mS vs 3.48 ± 0.45 mS; p = 0.001). Quantitative analysis revealed comparable results of signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of ASIR and non-ASIR groups (p > 0.05). Qualitative evaluation of resulting images by two readers revealed comparable results of both ASIR and non-ASIR groups (p > 0.05) with excellent inter-reader agreement (κ = 0.97). Both quantitative and qualitative assessment demonstrated better ASIR-V 80% than ASIR-V 60% reconstructed images.

Conclusion

ASIR-V algorithm is a promising technology for effective dose reduction of pediatric head CT with preservation of diagnostic image quality.

The image quality of deep-learning image reconstruction of chest CT images on a mediastinal window setting

AIM

To assess the image quality of deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) of chest computed tomography (CT) images on a mediastinal window setting in comparison to an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASiR-V).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-six patients were evaluated retrospectively. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT and thin-section images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP); ASiR-V (60% and 100% blending setting); and DLIR (low, medium, and high settings). Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were evaluated objectively. Two independent radiologists evaluated ASiR-V 60% and DLIR subjectively, in comparison with FBP, on a five-point scale in terms of noise, streak artefact, lymph nodes, small vessels, and overall image quality on a mediastinal window setting (width 400 HU, level 60 HU). In addition, image texture of ASiR-Vs (60% and 100%) and DLIR-high was analysed subjectively.

RESULTS

Compared with ASiR-V 60%, DLIR-med and DLIR-high showed significantly less noise, higher SNR, and higher CNR (p<0.0001). DLIR-high and ASiR-V 100% were not significantly different regarding noise (p=0.2918) and CNR (p=0.0642). At a higher DLIR setting, noise was lower and SNR and CNR were higher (p<0.0001). DLIR-high showed the best subjective scores for noise, streak artefact, and overall image quality (p<0.0001). Compared with ASiR-V 60%, DLIR-med and DLIR-high scored worse in the assessment of small vessels (p<0.0001). The image texture of DLIR-high was significantly finer than that of ASIR-Vs (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

DLIR-high improved the objective parameters and subjective image quality by reducing noise and streak artefacts and providing finer image texture.

Effect of Filtered Back-Projection Filters to Low-Contrast Object Imaging in Ultra-High-Resolution (UHR) Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

In this study, the effect of filter schemes on several low-contrast materials was compared using standard and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. The performance of the UHR-CBCT was quantified by measuring the modulation transfer function (MTF) and the noise power spectrum (NPS). The MTF was measured at the radial location around the cylindrical phantom, whereas the NPS was measured in the eight different homogeneous regions of interest. Six different filter schemes were designed and implemented in the CT sinogram from each imaging configuration. The experimental results indicated that the filter with smaller smoothing window preserved the MTF up to the highest spatial frequency, but larger NPS. In addition, the UHR imaging protocol provided 1.77 times better spatial resolution than the standard acquisition by comparing the specific spatial frequency (f₅₀) under the same conditions. The f₅₀s with the flat-top window in UHR mode was 1.86, 0.94, 2.52, 2.05, and 1.86 lp/mm for Polyethylene (Material 1, M1), Polystyrene (M2), Nylon (M3), Acrylic (M4), and Polycarbonate (M5), respectively. The smoothing window in the UHR protocol showed a clearer performance in the MTF according to the low-contrast objects, showing agreement with the relative contrast of materials in order of M3, M4, M1, M5, and M2. In conclusion, although the UHR-CBCT showed the disadvantages of acquisition time and radiation dose, it could provide greater spatial resolution with smaller noise property compared to standard imaging; moreover, the optimal window function should be considered in advance for the best UHR performance.

1024-pixel image matrix for chest CT - Impact on image quality of bronchial structures in phantoms and patients

Objectives

To compare objective and subjective image quality of bronchial structures between a 512-pixel and a 1024-pixel image matrix for chest CT in phantoms and in patients.

Materials and methods

First, a two-size chest phantom was imaged at two radiation doses on a 192-slice CT scanner. Datasets were reconstructed with 512-, 768-, and 1024-pixel image matrices and a sharp reconstruction kernel (Bl64). Image sharpness and normalized noise power spectrum (nNPS) were quantified. Second, chest CT images of 100 patients were reconstructed with 512- and 1024-pixel matrices and two blinded readers independently assessed objective and subjective image quality. In each patient dataset, the highest number of visible bronchi was counted for each lobe of the right lung. A linear mixed effects model was applied in the phantom study and a Welch’s t-test in the patient study.

Results

Objective image sharpness and image noise increased with increasing matrix size and were highest for the 1024-matrix in phantoms and patients (all, P<0.001). nNPS was comparable among the three matrices. Objective image noise was on average 16% higher for the 1024-matrix compared to the 512-matrix in patients (P<0.0001). Subjective evaluation in patients yielded improved sharpness but increased image noise for the 1024- compared to the 512-matrix (both, P<0.001). There was no significant difference between highest-order visible bronchi (P>0.07) and the overall bronchial image quality between the two matrices (P>0.22).

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated superior image sharpness and higher image noise for a 1024- compared to a 512-pixel matrix, while there was no significant difference in the depiction and subjective image quality of bronchial structures for chest CT.

Effects of different levels of CT iterative reconstruction on low-contrast detectability and radiation dose in patients of different sizes: an anthropomorphic phantom study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to verify the maintenance of low-contrast detectability at different CT dose reduction levels, in patients of different sizes, as a consequence of the application of iterative reconstruction at different strengths combined with tube current modulation.

METHODS

Anthropomorphic abdominal phantoms of two sizes (small and large) were imaged at a fixed noise with iterative algorithm ASIR-V percentages in the range between 0 and 70% and corresponding dose reductions in the range of 0-83%. A total of 1400 images with and without liver low-contrast simulated lesions were evaluated by five radiologists, using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) paradigm and evaluating the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The human observer results were then compared with AUC obtained with a channelized Hotelling observer (CHO). CNR values were also calculated.

RESULTS

For the small phantom, the AUC values lie between 0.90 and 0.93 for human evaluations of images acquired without iterative reconstruction, with 30% ASIR-V and with 50% ASIR-V. The AUC decreased significantly to 0.81 (p = 0.0001) at 70% ASIR-V. The CHO results were in coherence with human observer scores. Also, similar results were observed for the large size phantom. CNR values were stable for the different ASIR-V percentages.

CONCLUSIONS

The iterative algorithm maintained the low-contrast detectability up to a dose reduction of about 70%, following application of a 50% ASIR-V combined with automatic tube current modulation, regardless of the phantom size. At further dose reductions using greater iterative percentages, a significant decrease in detectability was observed.

Correlation of Algorithmic and Visual Assessment of Lesion Detection in Clinical Images

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Clinically-relevant quantitative measures of task-based image quality play key roles in effective optimization of medical imaging systems. Conventional phantom-based measures do not adequately reflect the real-world image quality of clinical Computed Tomography (CT) series which is most relevant for diagnostic decision-making. The assessment of detectability index which incorporates measurements of essential image quality metrics on patient CT images can overcome this limitation. Our current investigation extends and validates the technique on standard-of-care clinical cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We obtained a clinical CT image dataset from an Institutional Review Board-approved prospective study on colorectal adenocarcinoma patients for detecting hepatic metastasis. For this study, both perceptual image quality and lesion detection performance of same-patient CT image series with standard and low dose acquisitions in the same breath hold and four processing algorithms applied to each acquisition were assessed and ranked by expert radiologists. The clinical CT image dataset was processed using the previously validated method to estimate a detectability index for each known lesion size in the size distribution of hepatic lesions relevant for the imaging task and for each slice of a CT series. We then combined these lesion-size-specific and slice-specific detectability indexes with the size distribution of hepatic lesions relevant for the imaging task to compute an effective detectability index for a clinical CT imaging condition of a patient. The assessed effective detectability indexes were used to rank task-based image quality of different imaging conditions on the same patient for all patients. We compared the assessments to those by expert radiologists in the prospective study in terms of rank order agreement between the rankings of algorithmic and visual assessment of lesion detection and perceptual quality.

RESULTS

Our investigation indicated that algorithmic assessment of lesion detection and perceptual quality can predict observer assessment for detecting hepatic metastasis. The algorithmic and visual assessment of lesion detection and perceptual quality are strongly correlated using both the Kendall's Tau and Spearman's Rho methods (perfect agreement has value 1): for assessment of lesion detection, 95% of the patients have rank correlation coefficients values exceeding 0.87 and 0.94, respectively, and for assessment of perceptual quality, 0.85 and 0.94, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study used algorithmic detectability index to assess task-based image equality for detecting hepatic lesions and validated it against observer rankings on standard-of-care clinical CT cases. Our study indicates that detectability index provides a robust reflection of overall image quality for detecting hepatic lesions under clinical CT imaging conditions. This demonstrates the concept of utilizing the measure to quantitatively assess the quality of the information content that different imaging conditions can provide for the same clinical imaging task, which enables targeted optimization of clinical CT systems to minimize clinical and patient risks.

Comparison of radiation dose and image quality between flat panel computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in a hybrid CT-angiography suite

The purpose of this study was to compare, using the same radiation dose and image quality metrics, flat panel computed tomography (FPCT) to multidetector CT (MDCT) in interventional radiology. A single robotic angiography system with FPCT was compared to a single MDCT system, both installed in a hybrid CT-angiography laboratory and both operating under automatic exposure control. Radiation dose was measured on the central axis (D_c ) of a CT dosimetry phantom 30 cm in diameter and 60 cm in length using default protocols for FPCT and MDCT with the imaged length in MDCT matched to the field of view of FPCT. The noise power spectrum (NPS), modulation transfer function (MTF), and z-axis resolution were measured using the same phantom. Iodine contrast to noise ratio (CNR) was also measured. Radiation dose (D_c ) was 41%-69% lower in MDCT compared to FPCT when default protocols and automatic exposure control were used. While spatial resolution could generally be matched with appropriate choice of kernel in MDCT, MTF dropped more quickly at higher spatial frequency for MDCT than FPCT. Image noise was 49%-120% higher for MDCT compared to FPCT for comparable in-plane spatial resolution. Z-axis resolution was slightly better for MDCT than FPCT, while iodine CNR depended on protocol selection. Radiation dose was much lower for MDCT compared to FPCT, but image noise was much higher. Matching image noise in MDCT to FPCT would result in similar radiation doses. Iodine contrast depended on dose modulation settings for MDCT.

Finite Element Analysis-Based Vertebral Bone Strength Prediction Using MDCT Data: How Low Can We Go?

Objective: To study the impact of dose reduction in MDCT images through tube current reduction or sparse sampling on the vertebral bone strength prediction using finite element (FE) analysis for fracture risk assessment. Methods: Routine MDCT data covering lumbar vertebrae of 12 subjects (six male; six female; 74.70 ± 9.13 years old) were included in this study. Sparsely sampled and virtually reduced tube current-based MDCT images were computed using statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR) with reduced dose levels at 50, 25, and 10% of the tube current and original projections, respectively. Subject-specific static non-linear FE analyses were performed on vertebra models (L1, L2, and L3) 3-D-reconstructed from those dose-reduced MDCT images to predict bone strength. Coefficient of correlation (R²), Bland-Altman plots, and root mean square coefficient of variation (RMSCV) were calculated to find the variation in the FE-predicted strength at different dose levels, using high-intensity dose-based strength as the reference. Results: FE-predicted failure loads were not significantly affected by up to 90% dose reduction through sparse sampling (R² = 0.93, RMSCV = 8.6% for 50%; R² = 0.89, RMSCV = 11.90% for 75%; R² = 0.86, RMSCV = 11.30% for 90%) and up to 50% dose reduction through tube current reduction method (R² = 0.96, RMSCV = 12.06%). However, further reduction in dose with the tube current reduction method affected the ability to predict the failure load accurately (R² = 0.88, RMSCV = 22.04% for 75%; R² = 0.43, RMSCV = 54.18% for 90%). Conclusion: Results from this study suggest that a 50% radiation dose reduction through reduced tube current and a 90% radiation dose reduction through sparse sampling can be used to predict vertebral bone strength. Our findings suggest that the sparse sampling-based method performs better than the tube current-reduction method in generating images required for FE-based bone strength prediction models.