Imaging Features of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Children With and Without Underlying Risk Factors

Radiological and clinical signatures to differentiate hepatocellular carcinoma from hepatoblastoma in children older than 5 years of age: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Hepatoblastoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are the most common primary malignant liver tumors in children. Although some characteristic imaging findings have been described in both hepatoblastoma and HCC, it is difficult to distinguish between these two tumors over the 5 years of age.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate clinical and radiological findings that may help differentiate hepatoblastoma and HCC over 5 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 2007 to 2022, 19 consecutive patients older than 5 years old diagnosed with primary liver malignancy were yielded from our radiology archive retrospectively. Imaging features, age, sex, treatment, and follow-up data were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients (16 boys; median age 7.5, min-max 5-17), ten HCCs and nine hepatoblastomas, were included. Serum alpha-fetoprotein (sAFP) values were significantly higher in hepatoblastoma patients (n=9), compared to the HCC (n=10) (P=0.002). Tumor size and PRETEXT stages were higher in hepatoblastoma patients; however, there was no statistical difference (P=0.06). Initial MRI was available for six patients with hepatoblastoma and seven patients with HCC, and there was no difference regarding ADCmin values.

CONCLUSION

In the differential diagnosis of primary malignant liver tumor in a child older than 5 years of age, higher sAFP level may support the diagnosis of hepatoblastoma rather than HCC.

Review on Pediatric Malignant Focal Liver Lesions with Imaging Evaluation: Part I

Malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) are commonly reported in adults but rarely seen in the pediatric population. Due to the rarity, the understanding of these diseases is still very limited. In children, most malignant FLLs are congenital. It is very important to choose appropriate imaging examination concerning various factors. This paper will outline common pediatric malignant FLLs, including hepatoblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and cholangiocarcinoma and discuss them against the background of the latest knowledge on comparable/similar tumors in adults. Medical imaging features are of vital importance for the non-invasive diagnosis and follow-up of treatment of FLLs in pediatric patients. The use of CEUS in pediatric patients for characterizing those FLLs that remain indeterminate on conventional B mode ultrasounds may be an effective option in the future and has great potential to be integrated into imaging algorithms without the risk of exposure to ionizing radiation.

Incidental Findings in Pediatric Patients: How to Manage Liver Incidentaloma in Pediatric Patients

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental imaging findings-the role of ultrasound". IFs in the liver of newborns and children are rare and much less commonly encountered than in adults; as a result, they are relatively much more frequently malignant and life-threatening, even when they are of benign histology. Conventional B-mode ultrasound is the well-established first line imaging modality for the assessment of liver pathology in pediatric patients. US technological advances, resulting in image quality improvement, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), liver elastography and quantification tools for steatosis have expanded the use of ultrasound technology in daily practice. The following overview is intended to illustrate incidentally detected liver pathology covering all pediatric ages. It aims to aid the examiner in establishing the final diagnosis. Management of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) needs to take into account the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality, the patient's safety issues (including ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents), the delay in diagnosis, the psychological burden on the patient and the cost for the healthcare system. Moreover, this paper should help the pediatric clinician and ultrasound practitioner to decide which pathologies need no further investigation, which ones require interval imaging and which cases require further and immediate diagnostic procedures.