Association of HLA Mismatches and Histology Suggestive of Antibody-Mediated Injury in the Absence of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies

Association of HLA B- and T-cell molecular mismatches with HLA antibodies, rejection, and graft survival in pediatric kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Optimizing graft survival and diminishing human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization are essential for pediatric kidney transplant recipients. More precise HLA matching predicting epitope mismatches could reduce alloreactivity. We investigated the association of predicted HLA B- and T-cell molecular mismatches with the formation of de novo donor-specific antibodies, HLA antibodies, rejection, and graft survival.

METHODS

Forty-nine pediatric kidney transplant recipients transplanted from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively studied. Donors and recipients were high-resolution HLA typed, and recipients were screened for HLA antibodies posttransplant. HLA-EMMA (HLA Epitope MisMatch Algorithm) and PIRCHE-II (Predicted Indirectly ReCognizable HLA Epitopes) predicted the molecular mismatches. The association of molecular mismatches and the end-points was explored with logistic regression.

RESULTS

Five recipients (11%) developed de novo donor-specific antibodies. All five had de novo donor-specific antibodies against HLA class II, with four having HLA-DQ antibodies. We found no associations between PIRCHE-II or HLA-EMMA with de novo donor-specific antibodies, HLA sensitization, graft loss, or rejection. However, we did see a tendency towards an increased odds ratio in PIRCHE-II predicting de novo donor-specific antibodies formation, with an odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI: 0.99; 1.28) on HLA class II.

CONCLUSION

While the study revealed no significant associations between the number of molecular mismatches and outcomes, a notable trend was observed - indicating a reduced risk of dnDSA formation with improved molecular match. It is important to acknowledge, however, that the modest population size and limited observed outcomes preclude us from making definitive conclusions.

Back to the future: the uncharted role of T cells in chronic and unexplained microvascular inflammation

The 2022 Banff classification for kidney allograft pathology introduced the category "microvascular inflammation DSA-negative and C4d-negative" for cases without evidence of a humoral cause. Many questions remain about the etiology, prognosis, and treatment of this phenotype. Cristoferi et al. performed a molecular comparison of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection and its seronegative counterpart and suggest a central role for T cells in chronic donor-specific antibody-negative, C4d-negative microvascular inflammation. These results further question how we should classify rejection.

HLA molecular mismatches and induced donor-specific tolerance in combined living donor kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Introduction

We investigated the potential role of HLA molecular mismatches (MM) in achieving stable chimerism, allowing for donor-specific tolerance in patients undergoing combined living donor kidney and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT).

Methods

All patients with available DNA samples (N=32) who participated in a phase 2 clinical trial (NCT00498160) where they received an HLA mismatched co-transplantation of living donor kidney and facilitating cell-enriched HSCT were included in this study. High-resolution HLA genotyping data were used to calculate HLA amino acid mismatches (AAMM), Eplet MM, three-dimensional electrostatic mismatch scores (EMS-3D), PIRCHE scores, HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope group MM, HLA-B leader sequence MM, and KIR ligands MM between the donor and recipient in both directions. HLA MM were analyzed to test for correlation with the development of chimerism, graft vs. host disease (GvHD), de novo DSA, and graft rejection.

Results

Follow-up time of this cohort was 6-13.5 years. Of the 32 patients, 26 developed high-level donor or mixed stable chimerism, followed by complete withdrawal of immunosuppression (IS) in 25 patients. The remaining six of the 32 patients had transient chimerism or no engraftment and were maintained on IS (On-IS). In host versus graft direction, a trend toward higher median number of HLA-DRB1 MM scores was seen in patients On-IS compared to patients with high-level donor/mixed chimerism, using any of the HLA MM modalities; however, initial statistical significance was observed only for the EMS-3D score (0.45 [IQR, 0.30-0.61] vs. 0.24 [IQR, 0.18-0.36], respectively; p=0.036), which was lost when applying the Bonferroni correction. No statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed for AAMM, EMS-3D, Eplet MM, and PIRCHE-II scores calculated in graft versus host direction. No associations were found between development of chimerism and GvHD and non-permissive HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope group MM, HLA-B leader sequence, and KIR ligands MM.

Conclusion

Our results suggest an association between HLA-DRB1 molecular mismatches and achieving stable chimerism, particularly when electrostatic quality of the mismatch is considered. The non-permissive HLA-DPB1 T-cell epitope group, HLA-B leader sequence, and KIR ligands MM do not predict chimerism and GvHD in this combined kidney/HSCT transplant patient cohort. Further work is needed to validate our findings.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT00498160, identifier NCT00498160.

The Banff 2022 Kidney Meeting Report: Reappraisal of microvascular inflammation and the role of biopsy-based transcript diagnostics

The XVI-th Banff Meeting for Allograft Pathology was held at Banff, Alberta, Canada, from 19th to 23rd September 2022, as a joint meeting with the Canadian Society of Transplantation. To mark the 30th anniversary of the first Banff Classification, premeeting discussions were held on the past, present, and future of the Banff Classification. This report is a summary of the meeting highlights that were most important in terms of their effect on the Classification, including discussions around microvascular inflammation and biopsy-based transcript analysis for diagnosis. In a postmeeting survey, agreement was reached on the delineation of the following phenotypes: (1) "Probable antibody-mediated rejection (AMR)," which represents donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-positive cases with some histologic features of AMR but below current thresholds for a definitive AMR diagnosis; and (2) "Microvascular inflammation, DSA-negative and C4d-negative," a phenotype of unclear cause requiring further study, which represents cases with microvascular inflammation not explained by DSA. Although biopsy-based transcript diagnostics are considered promising and remain an integral part of the Banff Classification (limited to diagnosis of AMR), further work needs to be done to agree on the exact classifiers, thresholds, and clinical context of use.

Histologic and molecular features of antibody-mediated rejection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to summarize the highlights from recent research that involved pathological and molecular analysis of kidney allografts.

RECENT FINDINGS

As the research on antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to evolve, studies are focused on identification through transcript studies of pathogenetic pathways involved in the development of AMR as well as refinement of diagnostic methods either by correlating Banff pathologic lesions with clinical and molecular data or by machine learning. Of note, the past year has generated high impact research that underscore the importance of pathologic and molecular correlations and detection of transcripts or gene sets that would aid prognostication. The studies involving refinement of pathologic criteria also highlight the continuous efforts to achieve diagnostic accuracy and standardization.

SUMMARY

Research involving histologic and molecular characteristics that define AMR are central to identification and understanding of pathogenetic pathways and remain critical in the development of diagnostic criteria.

Alloreactivity and autoreactivity converge to support B cell epitope targeting in transplant rejection

Antibody (Ab) responses against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) proteins mismatched between donor and recipient are leading cause of allograft loss in kidney transplantation. However, therapies targeting alloreactive B cell and Ab-secreting cell (ASC) are lacking, motivating the need to understand how to prevent and abrogate these alloresponses. Using molecular, structural, and proteomic techniques, we profiled the B cell response in a kidney transplant recipient with antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss. We found that this response spanned the rejected organ and peripheral blood, stimulated the differentiation of multiple B cell subsets, and produced a high-affinity, donor-specific, anti-HLA response. We found epitopic immunodominance that relied on highly exposed, solvent-accessible mismatched HLA residues as well as structural and biomolecular evidence of autoreactivity against the recipient's self-HLA allele. These alloreactive and autoreactive signatures converged in the recipient's circulating donor-specific Ab repertoire, suggesting that rejection requires both the recognition of non-self and breaches of tolerance to lead to alloinjury and graft loss.

Immunologic risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant patients by combining HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecular mismatch is a powerful biomarker of rejection. Few studies have explored its use in assessing rejection risk in heart transplant recipients. We tested the hypothesis that a combination of HLA Epitope Mismatch Algorithm (HLA-EMMA) and Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes (PIRCHE-II) algorithms can improve risk stratification of pediatric heart transplant recipients. Class I and II HLA genotyping were performed by next-generation sequencing on 274 recipient/donor pairs enrolled in the Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children (CTOTC). Using high-resolution genotypes, we performed HLA molecular mismatch analysis with HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II, and correlated these findings with clinical outcomes. Patients without pre-formed donor specific antibody (DSA) (n=100) were used for correlations with post-transplant DSA and antibody mediated rejection (ABMR). Risk cut-offs were determined for DSA and ABMR using both algorithms. HLA-EMMA cut-offs alone predict the risk of DSA and ABMR; however, if used in combination with PIRCHE-II, the population could be further stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The combination of HLA-EMMA and PIRCHE-II enables more granular immunological risk stratification. Intermediate-risk cases, like low-risk cases, are at a lower risk of DSA and ABMR. This new way of risk evaluation may facilitate individualized immunosuppression and surveillance.

Subclinical rejection-free diagnostic after kidney transplantation using blood gene expression

We previously established a six-gene-based blood score associated with operational tolerance in kidney transplantation which was decreased in patients developing anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Herein, we aimed to confirm that this score is associated with immunological events and risk of rejection. We measured this using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and NanoString methods from an independent multicenter cohort of 588 kidney transplant recipients with paired blood samples and biopsies at one year after transplantation validating its association with pre-existing and de novo DSA. From 441 patients with protocol biopsy, there was a significant decrease of the score of tolerance in 45 patients with biopsy-proven subclinical rejection (SCR), a major threat associated with pejorative allograft outcomes that prompted an SCR score refinement. This refinement used only two genes, AKR1C3 and TCL1A, and four clinical parameters (previous experience of rejection, previous transplantation, sex of recipient and tacrolimus uptake). This refined SCR score was able to identify patients unlikely to develop SCR with a C-statistic of 0.864 and a negative predictive value of 98.3%. The SCR score was validated in an external laboratory, with two methods (qPCR and NanoString), and on 447 patients from an independent and multicenter cohort. Moreover, this score allowed reclassifying patients with discrepancies between the DSA presence and the histological diagnosis of antibody mediated rejection unlike kidney function. Thus, our refined SCR score could improve detection of SCR for closer and noninvasive monitoring, allowing early treatment of SCR lesions notably for patients DSA-positive and during lowering of immunosuppressive treatment.

Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation

Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.

A Banff-based histologic chronicity index is associated with graft loss in patients with a kidney transplant and antibody-mediated rejection

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the major cause of graft loss in kidney transplant recipients. The Banff classification defines two classes of AMR, active and chronic active but over time this classification has become increasingly complex. To simplify the approach to AMR, we developed activity and chronicity indices based on kidney transplant biopsy findings and examined their association with graft survival in 147 patients with active or chronic active AMR, all of whom had donor-specific antibodies and were treated for AMR. The activity index was determined as the sum of Banff glomerulitis (g), peritubular capillaritis (ptc), arteritis (v) and C4d scores, with a maximum score of 12. The chronicity index was the sum of interstitial fibrosis (ci), tubular atrophy (ct), chronic vasculopathy (cv), and chronic glomerulopathy (cg) scores, the latter doubled, with a maximum score of 15. While the activity index was generally not associated with graft loss, the chronicity index was significantly associated with graft loss with an optimal threshold value of 4 or greater for predicting graft loss. The association of the chronicity index of 4 or greater with graft loss was independent of other parameters associated with graft loss, including the estimated glomerular filtration rate at the time of biopsy, chronic active (versus active) AMR, AMR with de novo (versus persistent/rebound) donor-specific antibodies, Banff (g+ptc) scores, concurrent T cell-mediated rejection and donor-specific antibody reduction post-biopsy. The association of the chronicity index of 4 or greater with graft loss was confirmed in an independent cohort of 61 patients from Necker Hospital, Paris. Thus, our findings suggest that the chronicity index may be valuable as a simplified approach to decision-making in patients with AMR.

Alloimmune risk assessment for antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: A practical proposal

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease. Although an improvement in graft survival has been observed in the last decades with the use of different immunosuppressive drugs, this is still limited in time with antibody-mediated rejection being a main cause of graft-loss. Immune monitoring and risk assessment of antibody-mediated rejection before and after kidney transplantation with useful biomarkers is key to tailoring treatments to achieve the best outcomes. Here, we provide a review of the rationale and several accessible tools for immune monitoring, from the most classic to the modern ones. Finally, we end up discussing a practical proposal for alloimmune risk assessment in kidney transplantation, including histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA antibodies, HLA molecular mismatch analysis and characterization of peripheral blood immune cells.