Skin toxicity of targeted cancer agents: mechanisms and intervention

LC-OCT for early diagnosis and characterization of dermatologic adverse events to oncologic drugs and correlation to histopathology

BACKGROUND

Targeted and immune therapies have recently been associated with the occurrence of multiple cutaneous toxicities, often challenging to differentiate by clinical examination alone without histology. Line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) is a non-invasive and innovative imaging technique that has been shown to be almost as effective as histology in diagnosing several skin conditions. Our study aimed to assess the effectiveness of LC-OCT in predicting the clinical evolution of early maculopapular eruptions related to antineoplastic targeted therapy and immunotherapy.

METHODS

In the period between May 2023 and December 2023, consecutive patients with clinical cutaneous maculopapular reactions caused by oncologic targeted therapy or immunotherapy were enrolled at the dermatologic outpatient clinic of the Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome. Patients underwent clinical dermatological examination, video-dermoscopy, LC-OCT, and incisional skin biopsy of a target cutaneous lesion. To investigate the evolutionary pattern of maculopapular lesions (psoriasic eruption, lichenoid eruption, eczematous eruption, bullous eruption), LC-OCT and histopathological images have been compared based on specific characteristics (hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, spongiosis; papillomatosis; lichenoid inflammatory infiltrate; presence of intraepidermal/subepidermal cleavage plan with formation of a bulla).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were included in this study (11 males, 7 females, median age 64.5). LC-OCT demonstrated an overall concordance with histology of 77.8%, with a Cohen's Kappa of 0.69 (P < 0.0001). Sensitivity exceeded 70%, and specificity was ≥88.2%. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) ranged from 0.9 to 1 for psoriasis and lichenoid eruption and from 0.7 to 0.9 for eczematous and bullous eruption.

CONCLUSIONS

LC-OCT appears to be a promising tool for the early differential diagnosis of adverse skin reactions related to targeted therapy and immunotherapy, offering the potential to avoid skin biopsies in fragile cancer patients.

Characterization and management of ERK inhibitor associated dermatologic adverse events: analysis from a nonrandomized trial of ulixertinib for advanced cancers

Background Ulixertinib is the first-in-class ERK1/2 kinase inhibitor with encouraging clinical activity in BRAF- and NRAS-mutant cancers. Dermatologic adverse events (dAEs) are common with ulixertinib, so management guidelines like those established for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRi)-associated dAEs are needed. Patients and Methods This was an open-label, multicenter, phase I dose escalation and expansion trial of ulixertinib evaluating data from 135 patients with advanced malignancies enrolled between March 2013 and July 2017. Histopathological features, management, and dAEs in 34 patients are also reported. Twice daily oral ulixertinib was administered at 10 to 900 mg in the dose escalation cohort (n = 27) and at 600 mg in 21-day cycles in the expansion cohort (n = 108). Results The incidence of ulixertinib-induced dAEs and combined rash were 79% (107/135) and 76% (102/135). The most common dAEs included acneiform rash (45/135, 33%), maculopapular rash (36/135, 27%), and pruritus (34/135, 25%). Grade 3 dAEs were observed in 19% (25/135) of patients; no grade 4 or 5 dAEs were seen. The presence of at least 1 dAE was associated with stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR) (OR = 3.64, 95% CI 1.52-8.72; P = .003). Acneiform rash was associated with a PR (OR = 10.19, 95% CI 2.67-38.91; P < .001). Conclusion The clinical spectrum of ulixertinib-induced dAEs was similar to EGFR and MEK inhibitors; dAEs may serve as a surrogate marker of tumor response. We propose treatment algorithms for common ERK inhibitor-induced dAEs to maintain patients' quality of life and dose intensity for maximal clinical benefit. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01781429.

Unraveling cancer lineage drivers in squamous cell carcinomas

Cancer hijacks embryonic development and adult wound repair mechanisms to fuel malignancy. Cancer frequently originates from de-regulated adult stem cells or progenitors, which are otherwise essential units for postnatal tissue remodeling and repair. Cancer genomics studies have revealed convergence of multiple cancers across organ sites, including squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), a common group of cancers arising from the head and neck, esophagus, lung, cervix and skin. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge on the molecular drivers of SCCs, including these five major organ sites. We especially focus our discussion on lineage dependent driver genes and pathways, in the context of squamous development and stratification. We then use skin as a model to discuss the notion of field cancerization during SCC carcinogenesis, and cancer as a wound that never heals. Finally, we turn to the idea of context dependency widely observed in cancer driver genes, and outline literature support and possible explanations for their lineage specific functions. Through these discussions, we aim to provide an up-to-date summary of molecular mechanisms driving tumor plasticity in squamous cancers. Such basic knowledge will be helpful to inform the clinics for better stratifying cancer patients, revealing novel drug targets and providing effective treatment options.

Dual Anti-cancer and Anti-Itch Activity of PD176252 Analogues: Design, Synthesis and Biological Evaluation

Background:

Cancer patients treated with targeted anti-cancer drug suffer from itch or pruritus. Itch or pruritus is an unpleasant sensation that brings about a negative impact on quality of life, and serious itch may lead to dose reduction and even discontinuation. Gastrin releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) plays a critical role in itch, inflammation and cancer, and GRPR antagonist has obvious effect on cancer, inflammation and itch. The aim of this paper is to develop a new agent with anti-cancer and anti-itch activity.

Methods:

A series of GRPR antagonist PD176252 analogues (3a-3l) were designed and synthesized. Both anticancer and anti-itch activities were evaluated. Anti-cancer activity was evaluated in three human cancer cell lines in vitro, the anti-itch activity in evaluated with Kunming mice by intrathecal injection of chloroquine phosphate as a modeling medium. And the cytotoxicity on normal cells was evaluated.

Results:

Of the tested compounds, compound 3i showed potently anti-cancer activity to all cancer cell lines tested with IC50 values of 10.5µM (lung), 11.6µM (breast) and 12.8µM (liver) respectively and it also showed significant inhibition of the scratching behavior. Comparing with PD17625, compound 3i and 3g gave better inhibition activities against all cancer cell lines, compound 3b, 3c and 3i showed better anti-itch activity. The compound 3i is safe for normal breast and liver normal cells, but it has high cytotoxicity on normal lung cell.

Conclusion:

The synthesized compounds have dual anti-cancer and anti-itch activity, so the development of drug with dual anti-tumor and anti-itch property is possible.

The risk of dermatological toxicities of combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess the risk of dermatological toxicities of combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition alone in melanoma patients.

METHODS

We considered relevant prospective randomized phase I, II, and III trials of melanoma patients on the combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition, describing events of rash, photosensitivity reaction (PR), hyperkeratosis (HK), alopecia, cutaneous squamous-cell carcinom(cSCC), skin papilloma(SP), pruritus, and hand-foot syndrome(HFS), as eligible for inclusion.

RESULTS

Eight trials comprising 3163 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The relative risks(RRs) of developing all-grade rash with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition versus BRAF inhibition was 1.59 (95%CI, 1.35-1.86, p < 0.00001), HK 0.33(95%CI, 0.16-0.66, p = 0.002), SP 0.09(95%CI, 0.04-0.24, p < 0.00001), alopecia 0.30(95%CI, 0.19-0.48, p < 0.00001), cSCC 0.23(95%CI, 0.17-0.31, p < 0.00001), HFS 0.18(95%CI, 0.13-0.26, p < 0.00001) and PR 0.40(95%CI, 0.26-0.61, p < 0.0001), while the RRs of high-grade dermatological toxicities from all included trials were: rash 0.54(95%CI, 0.20-1.43, p = 0.21), HK 0.18(95%CI, 0.06-0.53, p = 0.002), SP 0.14(95%CI, 0.02-1.16, p = 0.07), alopecia 0.72(95%CI, 0.14-3.62, p = 0.69), cSCC 0.23(95%CI, 0.17-0.33, p < 0.00001), HFS 0.40(95%CI, 0.08-2.06, p = 0.27), and PR 0.14(95%CI, 0.04-0.51, p = 0.003), respectly.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis of data has demonstrated that combined BRAF and MEK inhibitor-based treatment is associated with an increased risk of all-grade rash and a decreased risk of all-grade and high-grade HK, SP, alopecia, cSCC, HFS, and PR compared with single BRAF inhibitor alone in melanoma patients. Appropriate prevention and management are recommended.

Pruritus Associated with Targeted Anticancer Therapies and Their Management

Targeted anticancer therapies have significantly increased the survival of patients with a variety of malignancies, improving tolerability and treatment duration. The increased lifespan and the expanded use of targeted agents have led to a variety of treatment-related adverse events. Pruritus, a common dermatologic adverse event with various incidences ranging from 2.2% to 47% across different categories of targeted anticancer therapies, has been overlooked. This article reviews the incidence, accompanying skin conditions, possible pathomechanism, and proposed management algorithms of pruritus associated with targeted therapies, including immunotherapies.

Fc-gamma receptor polymorphisms, cetuximab therapy, and overall survival in the CCTG CO.20 trial of metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Two germ line Fc‐γ receptor (FCGR) polymorphisms, rs1801274 [FCGR2A; His(H)131Arg(R)] and rs396991 [FCGR3A; Phe(F)158Val(V)], produce altered proteins through amino acid substitutions. We previously reported that the FCGR2A H/H genotype was associated with longer overall survival (OS) in cetuximab‐treated chemotherapy‐refractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Here, we aimed to replicate and extend this finding in the Canadian Clinical Trials Group CO.20 trial.

Methods

After germ line DNA genotyping, polymorphic relationships with survival were assessed using log‐rank tests and hazard ratios (HR) from Cox proportional hazard models, adjusting for known prognostic factors. The dominant genetic inheritance model was used for the main analysis.

Results

Of 592 wild‐type KRAS patients treated with cetuximab, those with the FCGR2A H/H genotype (n = 165, 28%) had improved OS (HR: 0.66, P < 0.001; median absolute benefit, 1.3 months) compared to those with R/‐ genotype (n = 427, 72%). Patients with H/R had intermediate results under a codominant genetic inheritance model (HR: 0.72, P = 0.003). No significant associations were found between FCGR3A genotype and OS. In an exploratory analysis, patients with the combination of FCGR2A H/H + FCGR3A F/F genotype had significantly better OS (HR: 0.33, P = 0.003; median absolute benefit, 12.5 months) than patients with the combination of double‐variant R/R + V/V genotype. Progression‐free survival results were similar to OS. Toxicity rates were not associated with either polymorphism.

Conclusions

The FCGR2A genotype was associated with efficacy but not with toxicity in wild‐type KRAS, cetuximab‐treated colorectal cancer patients. FCGR3A genotype may modulate the relationship between FCGR2A polymorphism and outcome. FCGR2A is a promising biomarker for clinical management for these patients.

CE: A Review of Common Oral Treatments for Breast Cancer: Improving Patient Safety in Nononcology Settings

: Breast cancer patients are living longer with the disease than ever before. According to the National Cancer Institute, more than 3 million women in the United States are currently living with a breast cancer diagnosis, and many seek care in nononcology settings, whether for treatment, acute symptoms and complaints related to their cancer diagnosis, or unrelated concerns. Yet many nononcology providers are unfamiliar with the various oral agents used to treat breast cancer, and their possible adverse effects and drug interactions. It is imperative that all providers be aware of these agents and know when a patient is currently taking or has taken them. This article provides an overview of the most common oral treatments for breast cancer and discusses common adverse effects and management.

Epidermal RAF prevents allergic skin disease

The RAS pathway is central to epidermal homeostasis, and its activation in tumors or in Rasopathies correlates with hyperproliferation. Downstream of RAS, RAF kinases are actionable targets regulating keratinocyte turnover; however, chemical RAF inhibitors paradoxically activate the pathway, promoting epidermal proliferation. We generated mice with compound epidermis-restricted BRAF/RAF1 ablation. In these animals, transient barrier defects and production of chemokines and Th2-type cytokines by keratinocytes cause a disease akin to human atopic dermatitis, characterized by IgE responses and local and systemic inflammation. Mechanistically, BRAF and RAF1 operate independently to balance MAPK signaling: BRAF promotes ERK activation, while RAF1 dims stress kinase activation. In vivo, JNK inhibition prevents disease onset, while MEK/ERK inhibition in mice lacking epidermal RAF1 phenocopies it. These results support a primary role of keratinocytes in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis, and the animals lacking BRAF and RAF1 in the epidermis represent a useful model for this disease.

[Management of the cutaneous side effects of chemotherapies and targeted therapies]

The treatments used in oncology cause frequent cutaneous side effects. The different types of cutaneous toxicities depend on the class of anti-tumour therapies and can involve the skin, mucosa, nails and hair. Effectively managing these cutaneous toxicities requires adapted preventive and curative measures in order to reduce their impact, notably on patients' quality of life.

Non-rash dermatologic adverse events related to targeted therapies

OBJECTIVES

To provide background information and management strategies for non-rash dermatological adverse events.

DATA SOURCES

Peer-reviewed journal articles, professional manuals, online sources.

CONCLUSION

During the last decade, many dermatological adverse events of targeted therapy have been reported, including xerosis, skin fissures, pruritus, photosensitivity, pigmentation changes, hair and nail changes, hand-foot skin reaction, squamoproliferative lesions, Stevens-Johnsons syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. Although evidenced-based treatment options are scarce, many recommendations have been described in the literature that should be considered to apply in daily practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nursing practice will be enhanced by education, assessment, and management recommendations.

Avasimibe encapsulated in human serum albumin blocks cholesterol esterification for selective cancer treatment

Undesirable side effects remain a significant challenge in cancer chemotherapy. Here we report a strategy for cancer-selective chemotherapy by blocking acyl-CoA cholesterol acyltransferase-1 (ACAT-1)-mediated cholesterol esterification. To efficiently block cholesterol esterification in cancer in vivo, we developed a systemically injectable nanoformulation of avasimibe (a potent ACAT-1 inhibitor), called avasimin. In cell lines of human prostate, pancreatic, lung, and colon cancer, avasimin significantly reduced cholesteryl ester storage in lipid droplets and elevated intracellular free cholesterol levels, which led to apoptosis and suppression of proliferation. In xenograft models of prostate cancer and colon cancer, intravenous administration of avasimin caused the concentration of avasimibe in tumors to be 4-fold higher than the IC50 value. Systemic treatment of avasimin notably suppressed tumor growth in mice and extended the length of survival time. No adverse effects of avasimin to normal cells and organs were observed. Together, this study provides an effective approach for selective cancer chemotherapy by targeting altered cholesterol metabolism of cancer cells.

Evolution of targeted therapies in cancer: opportunities and challenges in the clinic

ABSTRACT 

Targeted therapies have changed the course of cancer treatment in recent years. By reducing toxicity and improving outcome, these new generations of precision medicines have extended patient lives beyond what could be achieved by the use of nontargeted therapies. In the last 2 years, several new molecular entities targeting signaling proteins and immune pathways have gone through successful clinical development resulting in their approval. These new targeted therapies require patient selection and the discovery of biomarkers of response. This review discusses the evolution of targeted therapies in cancer and challenges in translating the concepts into clinical practice.

Pharmacovigilance in oncology: evaluation of current practice and future perspectives

RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

Pharmacovigilance (PV), or drug safety monitoring, aims to improve patient safety through the detection and management of drug-related adverse reactions. It is implemented both by spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and by careful detection of signals suggestive of drug toxicity. PV is an important clinical topic in clinical practice and pharmacotherapy, assuring the maintenance of a safe risk/benefit ratio throughout the commercial life cycle of a drug.

METHODS

We conducted a structured literature search on PubMed, Scopus, Cinahl and the Cochrane Library. We also performed manual searches in international databases of ADR individual reports to outline a structured profile on the topic. Our goal was to review key elements that affect safety monitoring of cancer drugs and their appropriate use, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of PV in oncology.

RESULTS

This paper provides an understanding of the methodologies used by PV in current clinical practice and particularly in cancer drug therapy; a focus upon reporting of ADRs by health professionals and patients; and a focus upon methods used by PV to detect new signals of risk/harm related to medicines utilization.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, few articles focus upon the importance of PV and post-marketing surveillance of cancer drug therapies. Structured management of spontaneous reports of ADRs and data collection is essential to monitoring the safe use of drugs in this field in which pharmacotherapy is affected by high incidence of drug-related complications and by a narrow benefit/risk ratio.

Personalized medicine in hematology - A landmark from bench to bed

Personalized medicine is the cornerstone of medical practice. It tailors treatments for specific conditions of an affected individual. The borders of personalized medicine are defined by limitations in technology and our understanding of biology, physiology and pathology of various conditions. Current advances in technology have provided physicians with the tools to investigate the molecular makeup of the disease. Translating these molecular make-ups to actionable targets has led to the development of small molecular inhibitors. Also, detailed understanding of genetic makeup has allowed us to develop prognostic markers, better known as companion diagnostics. Current attempts in the development of drug delivery systems offer the opportunity of delivering specific inhibitors to affected cells in an attempt to reduce the unwanted side effects of drugs.

NOTCH1 mutations occur early during cutaneous squamous cell carcinogenesis

Cutaneous SCC (cSCC) is the most frequent skin cancer with metastatic potential and can manifest rapidly as a common side effect in patients receiving systemic kinase inhibitors. Here we use massively parallel exome and targeted level sequencing 132 sporadic cSCC, 39 squamoproliferative lesions and cSCC arising in patients receiving the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib, as well as 10 normal skin samples to identify significant NOTCH1 mutation as an early event in squamous cell carcinogenesis. Bisected vemurafenib induced lesions revealed surprising heterogeneity with different activating HRAS and NOTCH1 mutations identified in two halves of the same cSCC suggesting polyclonal origin.

Immunohistochemical analysis using an antibody specific to nuclear NOTCH1 correlates with mutation status in sporadic cSCC and regions of NOTCH1 loss or down-regulation are frequently observed in normal looking skin. Our data indicate that NOTCH1 acts as a gatekeeper in human cSCC.